tv The Day Deutsche Welle September 13, 2024 12:02am-12:31am CEST
12:02 am
costs there were hostages taken as well, 251 about a 100 have been returned and its believe 97 are still being held somewhere in gaza . and so far there is no clear plan on when or how to bring them home alive. that's why last week some 750000 people took to the streets in israel, demanding the government take action and make a deal with him oss, no israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu says no, can do any deal with him oss, he says would be a deal with the devil and broke off in berlin. this is the day the i'm doing everything to a ton of hostages and to win the world. doesn't want to come. they just responded no, do a deal. the
12:03 am
also coming up a giant leap forward with a brand new look space x makes history with the 1st space waltz by private citizens in brand new space. it's not at home. we all have a lot of work to do, but from here, for service, for the, for, for the, with our viewers watching on tv as in the united states and have all of you around the world. welcome. we begin the day with israel at war with moss and increasingly in conflict with itself. it has been almost one year since see how much terror
12:04 am
attacks inside is real. the atrocities of october 7th became the trigger for what is now israel's war against the mos in gaza. and if you follow the comments that is really prime minister benjamin netanyahu, you'll know that an end to this war is not on the horizon of this could be fatal for the hostages, who were taken by her boss during the attacks interguards of their families fear this nightmare now has 3 main actors working against a happy reunion time. her moss and the government of benjamin netanyahu. we have more now with this report. last week, fury and solely intended beef. unused at 6 mill, hostage bodies were recovered from garza. they've been shot dead of to surviving for 11 months. is very, at least not only angry at home us. many, you have lost confidence that prime minister benjamin netanyahu is interested in making it to you to release the remaining 101 hostages. that enter lines in garza
12:05 am
come onto the berries. we can do nothing about them. so i think we need to stop there. will we need to to do a deal with them and the i think that we need to give them and anything they want. because if for residents and as well or the bell is suffering and they taking us to just as a government, do you need to save them no matter what, what you need to give, give them back it's, it's the har har show. we need them to come back home. we need this man to go away and let us revive our country. but the prime ministers village is provide coalition seems stable. that's despite these continuing must protest. and despite the drop in his personal popularity since october, no the impact on the government, not yet. so maybe if we had these 500,
12:06 am
the 1000 people go to jerusalem and sit there for 3 days. maybe price now. there is no one the challenge. and our position is not to you, and if i need to know who insist that only military pressure can make, come us release the hostages. but critics say, his sudden insistence that is ready, troops remain on the border area between garza and egypt. the philadelphia cory door makes in the agreement even less likely. now, the world will seriously demand that this will make concessions after this massacre . what message of the central from us? i'll tell you what the messages, murder, more hostages, you'll get more concessions. so that's not only a logical, it's not only a moral,
12:07 am
because the right insane. so it's not going to happen. she more of belongs to a small group of relations of hostages and sewage. this cage in gaza will say any presentations would endanger is for the future. his nephew of you know town or was taken hostage from the nova music festival on october 7 on my cell mcdonough, the deal and giving up remotely to anything. and not only we say any attempt to talk with a mouse will lead to more and more being murdered. and we're saying to stop the negotiations completely. and that causes understand that can be no more from us. not now the day of the shalley protest, as he is say, that often nearly a year the hostages chances of survival increasing the peak divisions and is rather a hardening with no agreement. insight on doing now by daniel webb and he's
12:08 am
a former senior advisor to these really prime minister's office. he was part of israel's negotiating team during the oslo peace process. he's now the president of the us middle east project, and he joins to be denied from london. mr. living, it's good to have you with this, you know, it's been almost a year since the terror attacks from last year. i'm wondering, in your opinion, are things as black and white as they appear to be. let me, let me give you an example. the hostages will only be returned in a deal with him off a deal which prime minister netanyahu says will not happen. is it that black and white in europe? it a very good question because there's always complexity and everything in life and in politics and certainly in war. but sometimes one has to just drill down to get to walk these going all of them. i think that is a reasonable summation of the situation, because as you say,
12:09 am
we now pro she one year when it comes to these ratings being held in casa, we now have a record, a track record. they was in a greed release in november that far ago that led to a very significant cohort of those being held, being released is role, have to stop subsequent to that is where it is claims the military pressure will get more hostages out of life. and it has not happened that has been the smallest number, but they are all mobile data bodies, whether killed by those helping them captive or killed by his radio strikes. so if one wants to see the remaining is really is being held for those who are still alive. returning home life, you increasingly see not me say this, but the majority, the vast majority of the families of those still being held, say, do the deal, missed the prime minister. you are preventing the deal,
12:10 am
but it also is the position of much of the security establishment. and that's before we even talked about what is going on with the palestinians in garza, the war crimes also being committed a gets the civilian population and the need for them to put a line on the horrors and the devastation in the humanitarian crisis. so nothing you all who she wants is really troops in the philadelphia core door. one goes as border with egypt. law says that's a non starter. that's not a surprise. how much it is is about, is real, not trust the egypt to secure its own border with gauze it'd be do nothing. now who would tell you that if we leave things as they have been, you're just going to have a moss, you know, returning to its practice of smuggling and more weapons which will then be used to carry out future terror attacks. well i think there's a few things going on here. festival, nothing yahoo is position on the philadelphia. colorado has been roundly criticized
12:11 am
and undermined and proved to be largely spurious. mm. by not only the use, right. we security, establish it, but also by something very simple. if that was nothing, yahoo position, you have been prime minister full soto since 2009 also. uh the ever since 2009 with a very brief one. yeah. hi. just why was you so concerned with the philadelphia car doors? then, only in the 9th month of these ro, invading re invading goss. i did not tell you all his move to take this or the delphi cardoso. you suddenly discovered that this was the ex, essential threats to is relevant. you now claim it to be somebody's, these really i'm not taking not seriously. well, they all take you serious is the prime minister. nothing you will find if he's not
12:12 am
the philadelphia, cory door officer reasons to preventive deed that the american media is not being straight with any of us. don't with their own. populate these re, probably not with the palestinians, the region, the rest of the world. when they keep telling us, the problem is just almost nothing you know, keeps agree. we know that's not true. they have to walk back some of their comments . and therefore, what you see is a situation where we remain solidly stock. yes, for political reasons. nothing. y'all has a coalition. yes. because nothing yahoo sees his own personal political revival as being wrapping himself as the indispensable time lead up to that unique war. but also this is ideological and he wants to continue this war on the policy. and that's, that's him. that this policy, that's the politics and it. well, yeah, you said you were stuck in depth despite the immense pressure coming from the united states for nothing. yahoo! to take action, and i mentioned that cuz i want to ask you about this. you recently wrote that
12:13 am
america is not a friend, a piece in the middle east, but an enemy explain what you mean there. what i mean there is that this notion that the us is placing tremendous pressure on that, that yahoo does not bad the 1st contact with reality. the 5 ministration continues to provide the weaponry not which protects these, relegated to the wrong, the weapon we, which is used all space to meet in gaza to cause this destruction if they were to attempt to put pressure on each route then is wrong, would have a very different calculation tonight, they provide political come. so you're saying this america is nowhere to mr. living, is that what you're saying? this is a map, this is america has more to look. i'm not suggesting that we should be welcoming some of the global but i am suggesting that america, like any of the state,
12:14 am
has the best. the politics has its own interest as it receives the best. the debates in america, or cost about all of these things bought to buy ministration, has chosen to take an approach which is antithetical to securing a short term ceasefire and to securing a long term piece. because they are lining with a party that is in violation of international law. and in violation of the 80 seeing was the good lies with achieving peace. that doesn't help us. it's fine. the us to be on these real side. but we need a calendar problems to that. not only so that the mid least can be, we stabilize them, palestinians can live again. then i would argue it doesn't help israel, your not being a friend to israel. when you in college extremism, a small stretch of fame to that, and indeed, not much, you know, nothing the opposite. because we thought, i'm sure that if you were to ask president biden who,
12:15 am
you know says he's an irish american zion. this that he would say that he's not helping or pushing the far right to gender in israel. but i'm wondering the what would you say to the 2 people who want to be the next president of the united states coming to harris. and donald trump is there, is there one who would be better or more suited for israel moving forward? well, have to look at a structural factor. so if you watched the debate the other night, they was scrambling to establish that pro is ralph over the slides. that's how they view the way in which american politics plays out, bought the box a mattress wading pool differences. because complet harris is the know the need for a democrat party the. the majority of who's voters do not fit along
12:16 am
with that policy. if you has a problem on this issue, so inside the democratic party, there are significant cohorts. i'll vote just elected officials who was saying this is not good politics, not for america, not for our international standing, not for all reputation, not being taken seriously as a country of law and order of international. it is not good for peace in the middle east, so you have that debate inside the democrat or the, i think present by the something of an outlier by being so fox, the rice president, trump, has a very different republican party. again, let's take the personalities of the 2 out of the president. trump has a republican party for whom the most important constituency on this issue is. event, jericho dispensation is christians. who are both zion is the most. he's right inside this and who believe actually in many ways quite an anti semitic way. but the jersey don't collect that then that used to be combined to die in, in the books that can tell me which is a vision i'm too excited about. so i think be the structural politics of the
12:17 am
respective policies matches here. but the bigger picture is we should wait for america to solve. this is ray. these are going to have to change their approach if they want a better future palestinians are going to meet a leadership that can challenge things. but typically we should look, you're looking to all direct us to help balance out the problem of america. by the way, that use to some degree to be you are an america in europe, could not entirely balance each other out, but could be useful. that could be a division of labor. unfortunately, today we don't have that you repeat, but we have to look else where is the shifting geo politics as a shifting global south in countries like south africa upset top it needs national coats as well mr. olivia. unfortunately we're out of time. but this is a fascinating discussion. please come back and talk with this again. um, because i'm sure we could fill in entire show up with this topic with you daniel, let me thank you very much. thank you so much or
12:18 am
take the money and leave please. the swedish government is offering to pay immigrants, $34000.00. if they go back to their home country. the conservative governments migration ministers said that this is part of a paradigm shift in sweden's migration policy. migrants who leave voluntarily can apply for the $34000.00 beginning in 2026. now that amount is $35.00 times higher than the existing grant, which has been in place since 1984 beneficial say that it's relatively unknown and an use for example, only one person and one person used it last year and i look great on as a journalist and editor at the local sweden. she joins me tonight from the sweetest city of mel. no, it's good to have you with this m a. so who exactly qualifies for these $34000.00. well they have specified all the details yet. but if we take the current product as
12:19 am
an example, the only available refugees, people who honestly that because of some other reason of production of their families. so like say a job or the wife probably you work on just go, you know, i don't really fancy still come back to because i have some trouble with the police and the comb grow display will also be available to people to already have a rest of the product, so you also called the compass, we didn't the go. well actually i change my mind just give me a moment please on that circle. so for the car of growth, there are no restrictions. will return to sweden off. you can give it, but you do lose your rest of those problems when you receive it. so if you want to retire, you have to go through the same process again. and do we know emma is their broad popular support for this? i mean $34000.00 as, as a lot of money to these huge public debate about this particular
12:20 am
issue yet. i mean, it's just one part of court. a lot of reforms that the government, especially for the migration of the tools, are not really clear what the impacts would be in this case, like this specific reform probably wouldn't affect thoughts. many people to be honest with you. i mean, the numbers should last year, only one person actually got the grant money. it makes me wonder what is the, the ultimate goal here. i mean, how many emigrants taking the money and leaving sweden, how many of those would be considered success? the government actually do want to invest money also in forming people is gone. but the primary that looked into this issue, it decimated the grunt of 354-4300, which is the privilege of 50000 to what to increase this kind of re, integration by 700 people. yeah. but the questions i did was very hard to say for
12:21 am
sure this we don't done a good spokes, personal migration. we actually saw the table, the but this was, this was a low to figure out that's quite a big pool of people who would potentially be interested. i'm not quite sure what the cause of point is for success. but i don't think it's a wild guess to think about it would increase compared to today. the government has promised to take a hard line on integration. um, is this move just for show? i mean, i guess i'm try, i mean i understand the argument put your money where your mouth is here. is that what this we just government is doing? in your opinion? it's the same, but we say that it's what part of the puzzle every little bit helps, like the idea of the governor's perspective is thought a lot of people today aren't integrated. don't speak swedish, don't have jobs, aren't really far. society and maybe in a lot of cases would actually quite like to leave. but the consul vargas. weasels. it's interesting that the government of going to inquire on this actually rejected
12:22 am
the idea. normally when the government launches an inquiry, it gets quite clear directives and you kind of assume it to go in the direction of what the government was. this time of the inquiry was us to study other countries and find methods that could increase the immigration from the grants to cash incentives and it just basically went, nope, no confidant. there are no such about this anywhere that works to lot of the big choir did say that this, we don't want to increase the crumbs increase the number of voltage returns to stomachs. then cuba, small benefits, just we don't public finances box. it's of the risks far outweigh the benefits of immigration drug would send a signal to the target groups, but they're not looking to see them, which would tom, beverly and us integrated, which upset consequences such as low lower labor market participation, more crime, a move in groups of the ground talks to others, basically advised me not to do this and even said that actually in the future. but
12:23 am
just for the migration agency, you should just don't funding this. nothing partners have that. that's fascinated either. if certainly gives new meaning to the term, i'm golden handshake, that that's for sure. and i love great on joining us tonight from melma in sweet. we appreciate your reporting. i'm a thank you. a new era in private space flight has begun for the 1st time ever to private astronaut. from spacing, i have completed a space walk which solved them lead their dragon council protected only by their space. 6, space ex is new, space suit has been years in development. i guess this was the cat walk result today. while i was pulling keith kelly, now he's editor of nasa watch dot com keeps going to see you again. certainly as a calling this a jointly forward for i wanna say the, the commercial space industry. is that what it is?
12:24 am
yeah. you know, and there's something about this that in some ways this has been done before. um, back in the day when i was a little kid. uh, this is how the for soviet and american national has went out. they just kind of did a little thing and came back in the mass or developed in russia, develop spacesuits that have back that little string backpack that has all the why support but today, and of course, the space is, by the way. yes, just because in 40 years they're trying to make new ones, but it's taking objections and they still haven't done it will space ex took some of these drives because money and went and developed these new suits and they're kind of like brand new, sexy things that are 21st century, but at the same time, you know, use my little model here. they have a chapter. so they don't need the backpack. the oxygen from this. that said the notes themselves are quite bored, being so what nasa have. so it's something called something new subject tried
12:25 am
something to it's new and all the new, know what we're given me asking, why is it been decades since nasa has come out with a new spacing? i mean the via the ones that have been used department, the space shuttle missions were basically the same ones that were used during the apollo missions. i mean, it's hard to believe that you know, 4050 years and go by and you haven't upgraded your, your space. it's or yeah, well that's, that's a bit of a bit of a conundrum for your cluster. in the us. on one hand, i've used the space 2 gloves and they're not exactly nimble. and if you start filling in with a, are they comparing steps? so these are not the most expressive, you know, space suits, they do their job, but it takes them working out good friends of you from your shoulders out and gotten bruises and so forth. and you know, they've been, this has been prompted more than once. digital spaces and they've just keeps spinning all this money. we never get some companies like um, actually and space. and i know the company is it struck out happens asked to build
12:26 am
spaces that we can use in the mood and space exit courses, develop their own spaces that says void for their star line or so we're making some progress. but it's not nasa, it's these companies because they can do product development enhancement. yes, i can hear interesting before we're not time. i want to ask you this crew with 3 times fire the international space station. that was that risk. you mean? what are the risk of going so far? it's risky in that, not for the spacecraft. you can do this easily, but you go into one region near the van allen belts where you get a radiation dose that's somewhat like 3 times larger than you get if you on the space station for 6 months. but you only dwell or stay there for a short period of time. that's it. any space walk is dangerous and the further where you are, the further where you are. but these folks had it all in hand and figured out and they did their thing and maybe next time, the fluoride to do something work as projected. well, you know what they say?
12:27 am
if you're going to take a space walk, you might as well look good while you're doing it. i guess that's what they did today. keep telling from mass or what outcome. he's always good talking with you. thank you. my pleasure. as well. the day continues online. you'll find this on the x also known as twitter and youtube, that dw news, or you can follow with me on social media, break golf tv, and remember whatever happens between now and then tomorrow is another day. we'll leave you with some of the highlights for this weeks or from some highlights from the convention in chicago. that was from the last year. just have a good night. we'll see you tomorrow, the
12:28 am
to the point. strong opinions, international perspective. this week's tell the vice presidential debate in the us was a study in contrast with kinda law jairus promise things, hope and opportunity. and donald trump focusing on risk and threats which you will hear the point next on d. w. answer the conflicts own with sarah kelly's ukraine
12:29 am
says that a threesome incursion into russian territory has made a mockery of putting the red lines and that the west should go haul in to help when the war. i discuss the options with a finished foreign minister, alina about tony, thanks for having me. so have a c, c. the prospect of turning the side in bushes and brazen of ukraine's conflict. in 16 minutes on d. w. the think the forward is twice think ahead or was outside the box on your but always remember to think for yourself. we all had to sign was incredibly like this is
12:30 am
the driving you with free information dw made for mind. it's a study in contrast, cumberland harris and donald trump. the candidates aspiring to the us presidency displayed fear sweet, divergent visions and values once again in their televised debate in one corner, harris for the democrats. the former prosecutor pledges generational change and an opportunity economy. strong alliances and support for americans friends abroad. in the other corner, former president donald trump, for the republicans, promising to hype terrace, cut taxes and shut down immigration. one thing is certain, the 2024 vote will deeply impact us relation.
10 Views
Uploaded by TV Archive on