in the center line, maybe that's on the w a dock. so it looks at how a set of the wells, plastic waste ends up in the ocean sides next. and it will be back at the top of the. yeah, that's good. the innovation green, the green revolution global. so listen to a whole lot of crime would probably be better to see if the care we subscribe to those channels. we've got every friday subscribe to plan. it's a the, the

plastic was suppose to protect the piano. pay the packaging, reload is on board a natural rule material. swedish engineer sten, goose stuff, tuning hope to come back. packaging related deforestation. and in 1959 developed the plastic box the, the individuals box were meant to be most stable and endlessly re usable. plastics could simply be recycled and we used continuous cycle of new products. no co efficient collection and sourcing systems could make plastic waste a treasure trove of rule material. the invention promised to be environmentally friendly and unimaginably profitable. the,

the scenery that has yet to become reality. the dream of an environmental miracle is increasingly becoming a toxic and nightmare plastic has spread across the planet like a dangerous virus. the 8300000000 tons of plastic. what produced between 19502015, but only about 9 percent was ever recycled. production is increasing exponentially . according to the u. n. more than $400000000.00 tons of plastics on now produced every year at this rate by 2050. that could be more plastic than fish in this thing . when we talk about plastic today, we usually mean plastic waste,

which makes up an average of 12 percent of all domestic waste and estimates of 298000000 tons of plastic waste and up in the environment every year and will release talk since for hundreds or even thousands of years about 50 meters behind me. there's a dead bird. the plastic on the race, full voice of a swiss foundation is trying to increase awareness of the dangers of plastic waste . around 11000000 tons of plastic end up in the oceans. every year about one truckload a minute, the ocean push birds and turtles nibbled on the shampoo bottle. plastic waste and the sea effect, animals and humans alike. since almost half of the world's population see itself,

the ocean's micro plastics and the food chain of very worrying. the new policy comes from plastic waste, also set and finally to attend 10 micro organisms that produce more than half of the oxygen on the check for the sake of the hill. and it's one thing is such and he does not know plastics impact fine to plankton do we know that these micro particles accumulate in zillow plankton read us? these plastic particles can be found at every stage of the food chain that there's and we are at the end from uh we just sent you an email back. so she was able to fax the entire food network to she doesn't want please. they said this is nicole, but the micro particles influence the immune system and the viewers of set up with some gross outputs and reproduction system. and also that's a viral spring. so to sample shows only your model of this one of the

alarming. and yet, the still not sure how the plastic virus, the all the sleep whole king some words and the poconos. committing a kind of collective suicide. the how has we created this plastics flood that grows bigger every day. the population growth is partly to blame. the us was home to 2500000000 people in 1950. we now number more than $8000000000.00 produced that much more waste in 2019 annual per capita plastic consumption worldwide averaged around 60 kilos in europe. it's almost

$150.00 kilos per person in north america over $225.00 kilos. where waste ends up depends on the 12th of the nation, developing countries or falls to take on huge amounts flooded with packaging from industrialized nations. the they lack the means to come by the end of the float of plastic packaging the go miss me this now usually leave or should the ends of many bottles of shampoo every year knowing that the target countries can do nothing without plastic or with the bottle here that was especially for the 80 percent of the plastic waste and the oceans ends up in asia. and almost possible plastic waste is produced, an

o e c d countries. instead of carrying the expense of recycling it home, industrialized countries preferred to exports the waste. sometimes even the legally entire villages are from drowning in plastic the, the bar last 2 weeks has been dumped here for a long time by the way, from denmark, national ireland, by my, the u. k. the us and found the street and i yeah, i didn't get it. somebody got or friday, the tons of garbage has arrived in brandon every day since the 19 ninety's, the indonesian town has become a plastic village. up to one residence hedge, to the golf, which heaps to search for. we usable items to sell for recycling.

the weather affects the earnings of any one who relies on the rice fields. full book, full harvest, no wages. that will not be of the time. it depends, since i have new debt design, so that's important to me, but not i no longer have to worry about money every day with the to announce you through the plastic waste also is a reliable income. the most is the impulse, it waste cannot be recycled. it's still used the many small businesses here in the east java region,

produce tofu. and they teach at the robin's for decades with a resource cheaper than would plastic waste from finding the black smoke clouds rise into the sky above the rice fields. talks ends and chemicals are released into the accumulation on the ground, the catastrophic consequences of imposing so much waste. but the media have helped raise awareness, sparking some businesses to return to what in 2018 china then the world's largest consumer of plastic waste stops accepting exported waste. a big change for the recycling industry. exports

destined for china instantly diverse. it's a south east asia and africa, which lot to the expertise and infrastructure to manage the waste member states at the posit convention in 2019 agreed on the rules for trading plastic waste into nationally. countries must now explicitly approve the impulse of waste containers. but customs controls the complex and expensive and the legal trades. still a balance was many countries including the united states don't recognize the a quotes of the possible convention. plastic production creates at this time emma, within the consumer society and reciting has become even more complex. because of the different types and usages of plastic, the whole

plastics are made from crude oil, but polyethylene to ross the late. so p 2 is the most frequently recycled plastic is unfortunately on the accounts for around 6 percent of all. plastics. of the types include polyethylene and probably properly or p e and p, p for short additive such as coloring, phone decides and anti oxygen's facilitate. the production process will help make the plastics more usable. the plastics become more or less the full resistance transparent. oh insulation. depending on their intended use, the chemical engineer used to manipulate the material, characteristics that plastic can they accomplish that by adding other chemicals

like salads. and that is awesome. so now is the source of the problem. the chemical attitude is essential for plastic production make recycling more difficult. the. the editors combine during the recycling process, diminishing the quality of the plastic, the new plastic product. so sort of hazardous chemicals touching consume, is at risk 10. during the circular economy, it makes sense to use recycled materials to preserve resources, but when you have recycled plastic, they may be additional chemicals contaminants and these chemicals can then migrate into the food when recycle plastic is used as food packaging. so besides fantastic can lead to higher levels of migration and also migration of hazardous chemicals,

we're learning that recycled plastic has its problems many recycled plastics or hazardous and even p plastic the supposedly safe is plastic. now, we've learned that as you recycle it, over and over again, it gets more and more toxic generation recycled plants. the european commission wants to be optimistic. we took note of new ones, recent publications, so about possible precedence of has of the substances in recycled b, d. the new legislation provides us with opportunities for taking action if that would be so needed a presence. however, we are very confident that that recycled b. d. if produced forwarding through the rules, we will lay down will be set in some countries of the world, recycled materials can be used in food packets. and one example is switzerland,

where actually the use of recycled paper and board for food context directory contact is not legal. recycling plastic is a challenge on many levels. only a small portion of the world's plastic waste ends up and recycling plants. much of it cannot be recycled in large quantities because of its varying properties. but whether recyclable or not, it must be source it a complex, expensive tough. the even p cheap also at the same plastic type has to be separated by color. labels and lids made of different plastics must be removed. the fox, the session cost a not to the young. the problem. many plastics offer cycle asshole

neutrons for recycling the multi layer plastics, for example, or plastics combined with aluminum metal or painted the primarily packaging used for food and medicine, the, the cost of sushi and the deterioration and pharmacy of to repetitive recycling mix for sites with products unprofitable the logistics cost more than the material and the new high quality plastic cell's better the

in europe, many types of plastic waste are connected, but not more cycles. a more efficient recycling system would require a restriction on the types of plastics produced and found them all home full additives. the part of the path toward safe and sustainable plastics is testing. and the other part is very simple. and that's to reduce the number of chemicals being used in plastic the plastics industry has to take action if there is to be any change. yeah, booking through dec showcase on foot file is incomplete or money or they belong to me. companies are increasingly looking for solutions on their, on then, not necessarily supported by government, but they have to do something on me for government, it's n g o as in companies together can make it better. so please provide me with

a may of success silicone. some companies have now launched muscles made from free recycled php books. recycled plastics, teams particularly questionable for food packaging. e you recycling regulations from 2020 to stipulate that to use plastic may only be reused and food packaging. if it has been cleaned using appropriate or novel technology, let me is on the say. let's say i can know more about your a particularly. i think we get to close this. so complying with the regulations is difficult. the current legal situation allows plastic manufacturers to keep the recipes in ingredient this secret. this is a problem for consumer health, but also for recycling that if you don't know what's in the material, you don't know what you can do with anything or see on public. good, the yeah, the hosting cloud, most of the back waves, ortho is looking to stuff by asking for families. you might tell you we before you,

when we say you do hosting, click it before it materials containing harmful substances, the recycled, they can contaminate the entire recycling child. you don't want them, you may know some of that action or think that there are some transparency issues in the supply chain which, which sometimes make enforcement more difficult and make also. yeah, the, the, the public is sometimes wondering about what is, what is going on with all these plastics. the recycling of most plastics is not. no michel, unlike michel gloss, paper the around 50 percent of the world's plastic waste ends up and landfills. 19 percent and incineration toms and 22 percent in the environment. over 2000000000 people currently live the balance of waste collection the system

including this village on the island of gaia and malaysia. $15000.00 people live here without running vasa and without proper waste disposal, garbage is thrown in the ocean, the lack of drinking voice, and means that comes in plastic muscles and creates plastic waste. the children here, i don't know any different. pollution has always been positive then lines people are desperate. the, the items of dalia is just one example. the situation is similar in most po, tropical countries. people sort of the waste into the river, where the next heavy rain carries ditch into the sea. the reading the oceans of

plastic as an almost impossible task. the plastic no certainly breaks down quickly into micro and the number of particles is almost always things to the sea floor. in estimates of point 5 percent. so one percent of plastic waste remains on the surface sea floor. it stands out for a long because of the low my going to be out of the dates. i know for the big organization from 6 to law school, they said they schultz, my crew plastics have even been found in trim, a depth of 10000 meters in the mariana trenches. all marine organisms today have been affected by my crew plastics. we thought it pollution, we called us to many on non such questions remain about the effects of plastic in the sea. science is only just

beginning to find on. so this plastic is going to be around for a long time. it's going to be with us until we stop polluting and even after we stop polluting, it's still going to be there. so we have to know what that's going into as it continues to age. this is, does it become more hopeful of that sample right now? we don't know, that's why we have to understand this. alongside the threat to the oceans. toxins in plastics continue to threaten all health. just how seriously remains on the or the dirty dark secret of plastics is that they are not chemically inert. they leach chemicals that get into the food that those plastic sur, containing the chemicals that can transfer from caustic into food are usually small molecules. and so these can be, for example,

the salads of these fennel's bends are fee nines. the p fast. plastics released the chemicals from which they are made and these have an impact on the health we still know relatively little about the exact effect. think about how many chemicals are in plastics. thousands and among them are multiple and the cr disruptors like the best thing, all the salads and other things that really have hormones, they change how you develop not all the chemicals that are able to transfer from caustic packaging into food are known. and so if you have, i'm not uncommon because you cannot assess the risk health risk of these and chemicals. so there is a blind spot today i look for plastic is used as without us knowing if it's safe for human. huh. but i would also said the loss of plastic is used in spite of us

knowing that there are chemicals there that are has to those to whom and how to, how so states as the chemical compositions have yet to be sufficient, they researched how and so what's extent plastics, of the chemical components tested before they are placed on the market, the in order to improve the health impacts of plastic food packaging. we really need to test the finished plastic product. right now, we're testing the substances that are used to make caustics. those are then changed during the plastic manufacturer into completely different chemicals, and we don't actually know that kind of close that out, migrating into the food and that people are exposed. we don't experience chemicals one by one. we experience mixtures all of the time, and what we now know from many different scientific studies is that the chemicals

interact when they are in mixtures. and the effects can be much greater than the effect of a chemical by itself. it's called the cocktail effect. i want to ask you this when your doctor prescribes you a new drug for treatment. what's the 1st question? he asked. he asks, what else are you taking? the physicians understand the cocktail affect? they understand the absolute need to take that into account. and yet the chemical regulatory agencies have failed utterly to do that. they get some chemicals for my food, some from order some from the air we breathe, so from the place beware and so forth. so we are really exposed to this next, and then we have all of these. it can be several hundreds of men made chemicals thing in our lab. and it's hard to know what all of that best together in this mix . and we have to test them for health impacts that are relevant to the human population. so that is cancer,

but it's also cardiovascular disease. it's effects on the immune system, its effects on the brain. it's effects on the rep, productive system. and it's also effects on the metabolic health. so diabetes, for example, the end products of plastic packaging. i'm not sufficient the test, as we know only the risks of a fraction of the chemical components which are protected by corporate secrecy making testing difficult. the one of the 1st things you learned in endocrinology is that high doses of hormones cause one thing. low doses of hormones cause something else. sometimes the exact opposite. that means you can't predict low dose consequences based on high dose experiments. chemicals reaching out of plastics, hormone disrupting chemicals,

can work at parts per 1000000000 at what seemed to be tiny, irrelevant concentrations, the old concept of the dose next, the poison is irrelevant to endocrine disruption comm pounds. so what happens if you have agencies testing in the wrong way, where they ignore a low dose effects you have hazardous materials in commerce? all over commerce and regulatory agencies do not test at low doses. for the most part. do government regulations provide any protection over the decades? funds has developed and we've learned more about how chemicals can be toxic, but often times, regulations haven't kept up with these scientific discoveries. we're starting to see some movement. for example, the european food safety authority. they now recommend that the amount of the p a we can be exposed to on a daily basis is actually a $100000.00 fold. what they saw just a few years ago. that's

a big change. and it's very likely that a range of other chemicals that are in the corn disrupting compounds like this being away will have their tolerable daily intake. what's safe for us reduced by a similar amount. this will revolutionize the chemical industry and move it dramatically towards sustainability. some countries are bad at protecting their citizens than others. for example, fronts of a couple of years ago actually banned the chemical abuse tional a from all of the different food pack. it didn't contain it, so it's illegal and funds to put products on the market that has been sent away. some of the nordic countries have stricter regulations on satellites or on p fast. and they don't allow these kind of clothes to be present in any types of food packaging. containers in the way, the most sciences being done on classics on the account. because in plastic on the

health impacts, the more we learned about how difficult it is to assess these health impacts, but also how many chemicals on plastic that are extra of concern to human health. the average person absorbs up to 5 grams of plastic a week. the same weight as a credit card. the main lease rewards from plastic bustles, food and into the barrel. more than 300 chemicals and the human body even in new bones, will begin on the new called. the micro. plastics are already found in the human percent. and mothers and children who are full and environmental as well as a public health problem for them to something too much. funds can only partially protect consumers. move in 650 breaches of

e u. chemical safety legislation by companies were uncovered in europe in 2019 and uniform global regulations are just an activist pipe dream, the k plus. it's a glow by the end of the plastic. if i believe your prospects industry is low by low, plastics are produced in one place has been processed in another, been sold and the fund would put the manufacturers in the system, keeping ingredient secret menus only even in countries with district regulations such as you are welcome on the hop, highly toxic plastics find the way on to the market. and so sort of actually, it's a go to in districts. don't say it's what's more that's of the plastics industry is not currently being held responsible for the environmental damage. it causes just violates the unimaginable scale of a sales full 100000000000 in europe. i know the coca cola pepsi co unless they are responsible for

14 percent of the waste collected from c shoals. by 2025 as much as $120000000.00 tons of plastic waste could be added to ocean every year. 10 times the amount in 2015 the e u. one full plastics to be recycle by 2030. but even if we global target on that, this would only reduce the amount of plastic waste and the oceans by 7 percent by 2014 and recycle does not mean cycles. the last a remains a challenge. plastics are here to stay. or

is it any more i cover the key selected sick plastic i think is an oil industry by product due to the climate crisis. i think there are restrictions on the production of fuel and crude oil. this is why petra chemicals have to come a 2nd important in the past 1015 years of what it particularly plastics. an oil additive is the plastic. it is a duty. so between the basics sooner let me put you in a memo associate. they can put you in the best interest of plastic lo be, is the oil lobby. they don't, the plastic produces are the same companies that produce oil and gas companies over the last 30 years. so thought they have prevented political decisions against climate change. so raised scientific down to hang up and stopped any developmental that could ricky, like production $45.00, i'm believe all which is to didn't look at best. if it results the, the situation is serious in action will hurt the environment and human health.

stuffy. does that mean you don't want them as and then when they the international law established, the polluter pays principal years of got the policy responsible for the damage also bad the costs, the plastics industry is doing well. i'm plastic is cheap because that's because the cost of a health, sort of the finance and bond diversity. you have borne by the general public or at least not by the industry, april the product which you pay it by product. if the costs are included in the price of plastic, right, the business model would collapse about, know some of this money into the equipment or do i? the plastic alternatives may be a solution. bio degradable combustible disposable table was made from hate, called food, or clone, such as bamboo, palm leaves without oil. but other chemicals like p fast compounds can be

found here. they make the product, water and oil repentant the call to break down the to have negative effects on health. high cholesterol levels, low satilla, cheap, low a bus weight, and they may cause testicular and kidney cancer. the only 17 percent of the containers tested by european consumer protection group. but below the recommended p fast limits level found that easy says they say, well that's it. the we analyze 16 plates. those stools made from single use plastic subsidy. all sudden my own age 3, you'll have no unwanted compounds. the disposable table, whereas supposedly combustible physical, but it contains many hum, full substances looks up and this is problematic if the compost is used to

fertilize plums from the pollutants and then end up on consumers. plains new, not us, and you cool. so metal before they come in in 2, we should avoid disposable table where not look for a substitute that has not any best of folks in moore, oklahoma. yeah, we see some natural materials come on to the markets, which. yeah, may be unsafe, but presently our framework is not sufficient, at least the union level to properly cover woods up, which is one of the reasons why urgently we need to set the wider rules to cover also for this kind of materials. which is why we're now revising the full compact legislation. all your plastics produced from song based rule materials, a multitude as a plastic alternative. some contain petroleum based polymers, others all supposed to be composed of all the bio based plastics try not to use for super. so it's just about to renew

a better sort just with the purpose of reducing the capital footprint, there'll certifications folks from hospitable products that go beyond the existing standards. but they don't need the sufficient no mandatory this done difficult, but certainly the require us on all thoughts, tasty 3. since the navy mentos must be bidding the new functional. why then the bank as you approach and do this face and do the same, they must be tested for equal took c, c. this is so those are some extra days that are not required to normal vacancy on normal plastics. bio plastics do not solve the problem of plastic in the environment. even if they all volume degradable, the composting require special facilities that are not yet white sprint. the

. we have to control plastic waste on land before it ends up in the sea. new approaches to plastic waste, all kind or to the environment. the plastic waste has traditional. they've been converted into energy and huge incineration sounds expensive and unprofitable. an alternative approach to converging plastics is probably around this. this plastic molecules are split. i'm conversion, interesting septic gas or oil, which can then be used as fuel or electricity. the. this technology is still in the test phase. it's environmental impacts needs to be minimized. the used and municipal waste management. pyrolysis could eliminate the need to transport millions of tons of waste by land and see the ends of magic

for cycling. is another promising innovation still in its infancy. a miss to produce a new p t plastic like home to can you did, you know, since it's acidic tv, the basement property of an enzyme is it selectivity? known the enzyme would only break time p t. i felt using the lock and key method less initial starting would be required to saving money. all deals of the own, pulsated pupils, he gets fuel our process leads to absolutely clean all thoughts. so remember through i, by example, the amount of this pinels consolidates. for example, drops below the limit called upgrade reports. see about the bustle production process is still the same and then our process sols. neither the problem the multiple causes in nature to the new nor the problem of micro plastics need. it pulled into the new solutions that lead to a more ethical,

plastic industry all years. the way we don't have that much time companies compete for consumers. scott is consumers buy a few, a product packaged in plastic. they will force manufacturers to use other production methods possible solutions also deposit some products with minimal own packaging, with a 98 percent of n t packaging in germany has been returned since 2003. the piece was on the phone. i cram onto the news as you need. let me know we have had a single use consumption for 60 years now. now we need to develop a circular economy yet with multi use packaging with us because it produces some customers that are not ready to move. we have to stop and change our i have to change what's in with them. i really believe that if you redesign packaging so that it can be returned and reuse at all. so that can be worthwhile for retired as

a manufacturer, as to the slides is that it's difficult you develop people new and just let me tell you about your is it a promising medium term solutions to the plastic waste problem? required investment and interest from oil companies and product to me comes down in hankle know, hang on, nestle and plastics. you're declined to be interviewed for this film. the haps, the police have pays principal needs to be applied to the entire production chain. financing infrastructure for a functioning search in the economy and it would be an incentive to produce more cycle and less home for plastics. ready

europe is aiming high, we are reviewing and revising the legislation on foot contact materials. and there we will look at a better alignment with the chemicals legislation. and in particular, the chemical strategy for sustainability did did, commission is working on to deal with the most most hazardous substances, probably substances with d. so endocrine disruptive properties will face very tough legislation and may only be used if, if that will be essential in the future. we need to have a high level of transparency. we need to have a better level of control. what substances are actually being used many promises for the future. but the clock is ticking and legislation takes time.

across the board legislation is necessary for real results as known as low as different from country to country. they will be circumvented for profit and to the detriment of the environment and human health. at the beginning of 2022, un member states agreed to develop a binding international treat team. the agenda included the limitation of plastic production, the regulation of ingredients and their environmental impact. in addition to health and social issues, the main focus was on implementing the pollution pays principal. the poor countries need support to develop an environmentally friendly waste management system. most importantly, plastic consumption must be drastically reduced. the best replacement for food

packaging is no food packaging. and that actually means assisting the whole way that the business models are designed and even the types of products that people consume. so i think the best that people can do for their own health is to consume less processed foods to consume locally, produce food, and does off foods that don't need a lot of packaging is we could focus on on high quality plastics on site plastics without hospital chemicals and move away from the really cheap types and those single these type of things. but i could definitely be hooked for plastics which are definitely not been impossible, but that needs to be a when and that needs to be an accept. those buddies might be, for example, more in the 1950. he's idealistic vision of a world with a search and a plastic economy has failed. the consequences of the plastic virus has major

challenges for today's to so a t a rethink is necessary as, as legislation to protect the environment and human health for future generations. the, are you ready for a very special fee to do you know, the $3.00 sees of a company to solve it? we have to cover 3 of the countries. tasty specialties, each with its own unique story and cultural significance. which is your favorite c max in 30 minutes on d w. answer the conflicts own with tim sebastian. as the warning

ukraine brings ever more death and destruction key european officials fail moscow is now preparing for contact with the west. i guess this week goes along with that view. these tougher roofing heads of his phone using television service. but you still believes russia can lose conflict. in 19 minutes on d, w, the shape crises, every single connection mapped out shows the geophysical reality. the on the board is what makes things the way they are mapped out, navigating a changing world. now on youtube, the,

the, the, this is data, but the news life somebody in israel strikes is the heart of has about a level the 90 s as it hit the medicine groups. headquarters sentences by roots is riley tv networks report that has full elidah. how sudden estrella was the target of this comes after israel's prime minister tells the youth and he wants peace as his troops prepared to invade. levon on my country is a more fighting forward slide after chess from some representatives. benjamin

netanyahu tells the general assembly that the un has become a const.