tv Death by Plastic Deutsche Welle September 30, 2024 2:15pm-3:01pm CEST
2:15 pm
tips mckennan, i will be back with more international headlines and on the top of the how i can control the power to kick in the south china sea was shapes are here. what this is supposed to mean the front of the house of global conflict of to decades of chinese extension isn't the nation is resisting with us in the course of a powerful incentive on september 20th. 2 the plastic was suppose to protect the planets. pay the packaging, the lowest on board,
2:16 pm
a natural rule material. swedish engineer sten, goose stuff, tuning hope to come. batch packaging related deforestation. and to 1959 to benefit the plastic bag the, the individuals box were meant to be more stable and endlessly re usable. plastics could simply be recycled and we used the continuous cycle of new products. no co efficient collection and sourcing systems could make plastic waste a treasure trove of rule material. the invention promised to be environmentally friendly and unimaginably profitable. the,
2:17 pm
the scenery that has yet to become reality. the dream of an environmental miracle is increasingly becoming a toxic and nightmare drastic has spread across the planet like a dangerous virus. the 8300000000 tons of plastic produce between 19502015, but only about 9 percent was ever recycled. production is increasing exponentially . according to the u. n. move in full $100000000.00 tons of plastic on now produced every year at this rate by 2050. that could be more plastics and fish in this thing . when we talk about plastic today, we usually mean plastic waste, which makes up an average of 12 percent of all domestic waste and
2:18 pm
estimates of 298000000 tons of plastic waste and up in the environment every year and will release talk since for hundreds or even thousands of years about 50 meters behind me. there's a dead bird. the plastic on the race full votes out. a switch timed ation is trying to increase awareness of the dangers of plastic waste . around 11000000 tons of plastic end up in the oceans. every year about one truckload a minute from fish, birds and turtles and nibbled on the shampoo bottle plastic waste and the sea effect animals and humans. unlike since almost half of the world's population feeds off the ocean's micro plastics and the food chain. a very worrying
2:19 pm
the, the new policy comes from plastic waste, also threatened fully to attend 10 micro organisms that produce more than half of the oxygen on the check for the sake of the hill. and one thing is certain nano plastics impact find to plankton. we do, we know that these micro particles accumulating so atlanta read us. these plastic particles can be found at every stage of the food chain. this series and we are at the end from uh, we just sent you an email back. so she was able to fax the entire food network for sheet. can someone please? they said that sydney cooled off the micro particles influence the immune system. and the g reserves, i put some gross outputs and reproduction system and also that's a viral spring. so to simply show a little bit more of this on the alarming, and yet the still notes show how the plastic virus,
2:20 pm
the all the sleep poking some words and the apocalypse. committing a kind of collective suicide. the how has we created this? plastics flood that grows bigger every day. the population growth is partly to blame. the us was home to 2500000000 people in 1950. we now number more than 8000000000 produced that much more waste. in 2019 annual per capita, plastic consumption worldwide averaged around 60 killers. in europe, it's almost 150 kilos proposed to in north america is
2:21 pm
a 225 kilos. where waste ends up depends on the 12th of the nation. developing countries are forced to take on huge amount that flooded with packaging from industrialized nations. the a lot of the means to come about the end of the flow of plastic packaging the goal. miss me. this fail usually for should the ends of many bundles of shampoo every yeah. knowing that the target countries can do nothing with that plastic or with the dependency of the say, such as 80 percent of the plastic waste and the oceans ends up in asia. and almost how full plastic waste is produced and o e c d countries instead of carrying the expense of
2:22 pm
recycling at home, industrialized countries preferred to exports the waste. sometimes even the legally entire villages are from drowning in plastic the, the bar plastic waste has been dumped here for a long time. either way from denmark, michel, ireland. i might be u. k. the us and on the street. yeah. and i, yeah, i can get it. somebody got or friday, the tons of calls which has arrived in london every day since the 19 ninety's. the indonesian town has become a plastic village up to one residence head for the golf chips to search for reusable items to sell for recycling. the. the
2:23 pm
weather affects the earnings of any one who relies on the rice fields for walk, for harvest, no wages that will not become the time. it depends. i have no debt design, so that's important to me and that i no longer have to worry about money every day with the tutor down. the plastic waste also is a reliable income. the most is the impulse, it waste cannot be recycled. it's still used the many small businesses here in the east java region, produce tofu, and they have heat at their office for decades with
2:24 pm
a resource cheaper than would plastic waste from finding the black smoke clouds rise into the sky above the rice fields, toxins and chemicals are released into the accumulation on the ground, the catastrophic consequences of imposing so much waste. but the media have helped raise awareness, sparking some businesses to return to what in 2018 china then the world's largest consumer of plastic waste stops accepting exported waste. a big change for the recycling industry. exports destined for china instantly diverse. it's a south east asia and africa,
2:25 pm
which like to the expertise and infrastructure to manage the waste member states at the positive convention in 2019 agreed on the rules for trading plastic waste into nationally. countries must now explicitly approve the impulse of waste containers. both customs controls the complex and expensive and the legal traits still a balance was many countries including the united states don't recognize the a quotes of the possible convention. plastic production creates at this time them are within the consumer society and resulting has to come even more complex because of the different types and use such as a plastic the bowl. plastics are made from crude oil,
2:26 pm
but polyethylene to ross the late. so p c is the most frequently recycled plastic is unfortunately on the accounts for around 6 percent of all. plastics. of the types include polyethylene and probably properly or p e and p, p for short. additive, such as coloring fung, decides, and anti oxygens facilitate the production process will help make the plastics more usable. the plastics become more or less the full resistance transparent o n c lation. depending on their intended use, the chemical engineer used to manipulate the material characteristics. oh that plastic can they accomplish that by adding other chemicals like pallets and that is awesome. the so not always the source of the problem. the chemical attitude is
2:27 pm
essential for plastic production make recycling more difficult. the. the editors combine during the recycling process, diminishing the quality of the plastic, the new plastic products of sort of hazardous chemicals, touching consumers at risk, and 10 during the start to the economy. it makes sense to use recycled materials to preserve resources, but when you have recycled plastic they may be additional chemicals contaminants and these chemicals can then migrate into the food when recycle plastic is used as food packaging. so recycling tastic can lead to higher levels of migration and also migration of hazardous chemicals. we're learning that recycled plastic has its
2:28 pm
problems many recycled plastics or hazardous and even p plastic supposedly safe as plastic though. we've learned that as you recycle it over and over again. it gets more and more toxic generation recycled plants. the european commission wants to be optimistic. we took note of new on $0.03 publication, so about possible precedence of has of the substances in recycled b, d. the new legislation provides us with opportunities for taking action if that would be so needed a presence. however, we are very confident that the recycled b d. if produced, forwarding to the rules, we will lay down will be set in some countries of the wealth recycled materials can be used in food packaging. one example is switzerland, where actually the use of recycled paper and board for food context directory
2:29 pm
contact is not legal. recycling plastic is a challenge on many levels. only a small portion of the world's plastic waste ends up and recycling plants. much of it cannot be recycled in large quantities because of its varying properties. but whether recyclable or not, it must be source it a complex, expensive tough. the even be cheap also at the same plastic type have to be separated by color. labels and lids made of different plastics must be removed. the fox, the session cost a not to the young, the problem. many plastics, all recycle asshole. neutrons for recycling
2:30 pm
the multi layer plastics for example. or plastics combined with aluminum metal or painted the primarily packaging used for food and medicine, the, the cost sushi and the deterioration and pharmacy officer. repetitive recycling mix for stifled products, unprofitable. the logistics cost more than the material and the new high quality plastic cells better the in europe, many types of plastic waste are connected but not recycled. a more efficient or
2:31 pm
cycling system would require a restriction on the types of plastics produced and found them all home full additives. the part of the path toward safe and sustainable plastics is testing. and the other part is very simple. and that's to reduce the number of chemicals being used in plastic. the plastics industry has to take action if there's to be any change. yeah, booking through dec showcase on foot file isn't copies of money. are they belong to me? companies are increasingly looking for solutions on their own, then not necessarily supported by government, but they have to do something on me for government. and joe's and companies together can make it better. for please, on the webinar while he was on may of success silicone,
2:32 pm
there were some companies have now launched bustles made from free, recycled php books for psycho plastics. teams particularly questionable for food packaging. e, you recycling regulations from 2020 to stipulate that use plastic may only be reused and food packaging. if it has been cleaned using appropriate or novel technology. let me is on the say, let's say i can know more about your a particularly. i think we get to close this so complying with the regulations is difficult. the current legal situation allows plastic manufacturers to keep the recipes in ingredient this secret. this is a problem for consumer health, but also for recycling that if you don't know what's in the material, you don't know what you can do with anything or see on public. good, the yeah, the hosting cloud, most of the back waves offer it looking to stuff by asking for families. you might tell you, we buy for you when we send you the hosting, click it before its materials containing harmful substances, the recycled,
2:33 pm
they can contaminate the entire recycling change. you don't want them, you may know some of that action or think that there are some transparency issues in the supply chain which, which sometimes make enforcement more difficult and make also. yeah, that the, the public is sometimes wondering about what is, what is going on with all these plastics. the recycling of most plastics is not no michel, unlike metal gloss, paper the around 50 percent of the world's plastic waste ends up in landfills. 19 percent and incineration jones and 22 percent in the environment. over 2000000000 people currently live without some waste can actually system including this village on the island of gaia and malaysia. 15000 people live here
2:34 pm
without running vasa and without proper waste disposal. garbage is thrown in the ocean, the lack of drinking voice, and means that comes in plastic muscles and creates plastic waste. the children here don't know any different. pollution has always been positive then lines people are desperate. the, the items of dalia is just one example. the situation is similar in most poor tropical countries. people sort of the waste into the river where the next heavy rain carries this into the sea, the reading, the oceans of plastic as an almost impossible task. the plastic no certainly breaks down quickly into micro
2:35 pm
and the number of caustic holes is almost always things to the sea floor. in estimates of point 5 percent. so one percent of plastic waste remains on the surface sea floor. it stands out for a long because of the lo, microbial of the dates. i know for the additional 6 to last, when they say they schultz, my crew plastics have even been found in trim, a depth of 10000 meters in the mariana trench. all marine organisms today have been affected by micro plastics. we thought it pollution. we called us to many on non such questions remain about the effects of plastic in the sea. science is only just beginning to find on. so
2:36 pm
this plastic is going to be around for a long time. it's going to be with us until we stop polluting. and even after we stop polluting, it's still going to be there. so we have to know what that's going into as it continues to age. this is, does it become more helpful or that sample right now? we don't know. that's why we have to understand this. alongside the threat to the oceans. toxins in plastics continue to threaten all health. just how seriously remains on the. the dirty dark secret of plastics is that they are not chemically inert. they leach chemicals that get into the food that those plastics are containing. the chemicals that can transfer from caustic into food are usually small molecules. and so these can be, for example, the salads of the bees, fennel's. the venza fee nines,
2:37 pm
the p. fast. plastics released the chemicals from which they are made. and these have an impact on the health we still know relatively little about the exact effect. think about how many chemicals are in plastics. thousands and among them are multiple and the creative structures like the best thing, all the satellites and other things that really have hormones. they change how you develop, not all of the chemicals that are able to transfer from caustic packaging into food are known. and so if you have, i'm not uncommon because you cannot assess the risk health risk of these on non chemicals. so there is a blind spot today, a little plastic is used as without us knowing if it's a freshman house. but i would also said that the loss of plastic is used in spite of us knowing that there are chemicals there that are has to those to whom and how
2:38 pm
to, how so states as the chemical compositions have yet to be sufficient, they researched how and so was extended to plastics of the chemical components tested before they are placed on the market the in order to improve the health impacts of plastic food packaging. we really need to test the finished plastic product. right now. we testing the substances that are used to make caustics, but those are then changed during the plastic manufacturer into completely different chemicals. and we don't actually know that kind of close that out, migrating into the food and that people are exposed. we don't experience chemicals one by one. we experience mixtures all of the time. and what we now know from many different scientific studies is that the chemicals interact when they are in mixtures. and the effects can be much greater than the effect of
2:39 pm
a chemical by itself. it's called a cocktail effect. i want to ask you this when your doctor prescribes you a new drug for treatment. what's the 1st question? he asked. he asks, what else are you taking? the physicians understand the cocktail affect. they understand the absolute need to take that into account. and yet the chemical regulatory agencies have failed utterly to do that. they get some chemicals for my food. so i'm from order some from the air we breathe from the place beware and so forth. so we are really exposed to this mix, and then we have all these. it can be several hundreds of men made chemicals thing in our blog. and that it's hard to know what all of that best together in this mix, and we have to test them for health impacts that are relevant to the human population. so that is cancer, but it's also cardiovascular disease. it's effects on the immune system,
2:40 pm
its effects on the brain. it's effects on the rep, productive system. and it's also effects on the metabolic health diabetes for example, the end products of plastic packaging. i'm not sufficient the test, as we know only the risks of a fraction of the chemical components which are protected by corporate secrecy making testing difficult. the one of the 1st things you learned in endocrinology is that high doses of hormones cause one thing. low doses of hormones cause something else. sometimes the exact opposite. that means you can't predict low dose consequences based on high dose experiments. chemicals reaching out of plastics, hormone disrupting chemicals, can work at parts per 1000000000 at what seemed to be tiny, irrelevant concentrations. the old concept of the dose makes the poison is
2:41 pm
irrelevant to endocrine disruption comm pounds. so what happens if you have agencies testing in the wrong way, where they ignore a low dose effects you have hazardous materials in commerce? all over commerce and regulatory agencies do not test at low doses. for the most part. do government regulations provide any protection over the decades? science has developed and we've learned more about how chemicals can be toxic, but oftentimes, regulations haven't kept up with the scientific discoveries. we're starting to see some movement. for example, the european food safety authority. they now recommend that the amount of bpa we can be exposed to on a daily basis is actually a $100000.00 unfold what they saw just a few years ago. that's a big change. and it's very likely that
2:42 pm
a range of other chemicals that are in the current disrupting compounds like this going away will have their tolerable daily intake. what's safe for us reduced by a similar amount. this will revolutionize the chemical industry and move it dramatically towards sustainability. some countries are bad at protecting the citizens than others. for example, fronts of a couple of years ago actually banned the chemical piece, you know, a from all of the different food pack. it didn't contain it, so it's illegal and funds to put products on the market that has been in a way some of the nordic countries have stricter regulations on satellites or on p facts. and they don't allow these kind of clothes to be present in any types of food packaging. containers in the way, the most sciences being done on classics on the chemicals in plastic, on the health impacts. the more we learn about how difficult it is to assess these
2:43 pm
health impacts, but also how many chemicals are in plastic that are extra of concern to human health. the average person absorbs up to 5 grams of plastic per week. the same weight as a credit card. the main lease rewards from plastic bustles, food, and into the federal move in 300 chemicals into a human body. even in new bones. the new called the micro plastics are already found in the human present. in mothers and children who are full and environmental as well as a public health problem for them to something to meet funds can only partially protect consumers, move in 650 breaches of e u. chemical safety legislation by companies were uncovered in europe in 2019
2:44 pm
and uniform global regulations are just an activist pipe dream. the that is k plus. it's a glow by the end of the plastic. if i believe your prospects industry is low by low, plastics are produced in one place has been processed in another, been sold and the fund would put the manufacturers in the system, keeping ingredient secret menus only even in countries with district regulations such as you are welcome on the hop, highly toxic plastics find the way on to the market. and so sort of actually, it's a glitch in districts. don't say it's what's more the it's, it's in the plastics industry is not currently being held responsible for the environmental damage. it causes, despite the unimaginable scale of a sales $100000000000.00 in europe and the coca cola pepsi co unless they are responsible for
2:45 pm
14 percent of the waste collected from c shoals. by 2025. as much as $120000000.00 tons of plastic waste could be added to ocean every year. 10 times the amount in 2015 the u. one soul plastics to be recycle by 2030. but even if level target on that this would only reduce the amount of plastic waste and the oceans by 7 percent by 2014. the and recycle does not mean cycles. the last a remains a challenge. plastics are here to stay. or is it a more i cover the like the selective sick plastic i think is an oil industry by
2:46 pm
product due to the climate crisis. i think there are restrictions on the production of fuel and crude oil. this is why petra chemicals have to come a 2nd important tenor over the past 1015 years of what it particularly plastics. an oil additive is the plastic it is entity. so between the basics sooner let me put you in a memo associate. they can put you in the best interest of plastic globe is the oil lobby. they don't, the plastic produces are the same companies that produce oil and gas companies over the last 30 years. so thought they have prevented political decisions against climate change. johnson raised scientific down to heads up and stopped any developmental that could regulate production. i'm believe officer to didn't look at best if it results the, the situation is serious in action will hurt the environment and human health. stuffy design,
2:47 pm
a grilled warrant that isn't that will make the international law established. the polluter pays principal years ago. the policy responsible for the damage was also bad. the cost the plastics industry is doing well. plastic is cheap because that's because the cost of a health, sort of the finance and bond diversity. you have borne by the general publicly so not by the industry, april the product which you pick it up on. if the costs are included in the price of plastic, right, the business model would collapse about, know some of this money into the equipment or do i? the plastic alternatives may be a solution. bio degradable combustible disposable table was made from hate called poodle plants, such as bamboo palm leaves without oil, but other chemicals like piece tasks. compounds can be found here. they make the product, water and oil repentant,
2:48 pm
but how to break down the to have negative effects on health, high cholesterol levels, lowest activity, low a bus weight, and they may cause testicular. i'm kidney cancer, the early 17 percent of the containers tested by your european consumer protection group. but below the recommended p fast limits level said that easy says they say, well that's it. the we analyze 16 plates. those stools made from single use plastic subsidy. also some, only 3 you'll have no unwanted compound the disposable table, whereas supposedly combustible physical. but it contains many hum, full substances, accepting this is problematic if the compost is used to fertilize plums from the pollutants and then end up on consumers,
2:49 pm
plains new. notice and you can feel my to pay for the coming in to we should avoid disposable table where not look for a substitute. this is not any best of folks in moore, oklahoma. yeah, we see some natural materials come on to the markets, which. yeah. may be unsafe, but presently our framework is not sufficient, at least at the union level, to properly cover woods up, which is one of the reasons why or simply we need to set the wider rules to cover also for this kind of materials, which is why we're now revising the food compet legislation? volume plastics produced from song based room materials, a multitude as a plastic alternative. some contain petroleum based polymers, others all supposed to be compatible. the bio based plastics try not to use for super sources but to renewable sources, but the purpose of reducing the capital for viral certifications. folks from
2:50 pm
hospitable products that go beyond the existing standards, but they all need a sufficient no mandatory this done difficult percent of the require us on all thoughts, tasty 3. since the navy mentos are must be very new, much lower than the other bank. as you approach and this is facing and the, the same, they must be tested for equal took c c. this is some, some extra things that are not required to normal vacancy on normal plastics. bio plastics do not solve the problem of plastic in the environment. even if they all volume degradable that come posting require special facilities that are not yet wide sprint the we have to control plastic waste on land before it ends often the sea,
2:51 pm
new approaches to plastic waste, all kind of the environment. the plastic waste has traditional the been converted into energy and huge incineration clones, expensive and unprofitable. an alternative approach to converging plastics is probably around this. this plastic model chose a split. i'm conversion to interesting septic gas oil, which can then be used as fuel or electricity. the. this technology is still in the test phase. it's environmental impacts needs to be minimized. the used and municipal waste management. pyrolysis could eliminate the need to transport millions of tons of waste by land and see the ends of magic
2:52 pm
for cycling. is another promising innovation still in its infancy. a miss to produce a new p t plastic like home because he did, he knows in success, select tv, the basic property of an enzyme is it selectivity, known the enzyme would only break down p t. i felt using the lock and key method less initial starting would be required to saving money with all the details of the impulse they did a few weeks he gets you are process leads to the absolutely clean also. so remember to lie by example. they might have this fennel's folly. it's for example, drops below the limit buckled up create a new policy. but the bustle, production process is still the same in our process, sol. neither is a problem that the multiple causes in nature to the new nor the problem of micro plastics need. they pulled into new solutions that lead to
2:53 pm
a more effectual plastic industry all years. the way we don't have that much time companies compete for consumers got is consumers buy a few of products packaged in plastic. they will force manufacturers to use other production methods. possible solutions also deposit some products with minimal own packaging, with a 98 percent of n. t packaging in germany has been returned since 2003 the piece for us on the phone. i cram on the news, as you know, we have had a single use consumption for 60 years. now only now we need to develop a circular economy with multi use packaging with us because it produces some customers that are not ready to move. we have to stop and change our opportunity to work with them. i really believe that if you redesign packaging so that it can be returned and reuse at all. so i can be worthwhile for retired as a manufacturer has decided to use that it's not often difficult. beautiful people
2:54 pm
knew it. just let me tell you know, if you're, is it a promising medium term solutions to the plastic waste problem? required investment and interest from oil companies and product to me comes down in hankle know, hang on, nestle and plastics. europe declined to be interviewed for this film. the haps, the police have pays principal needs to be applied to the entire production chain, financing infrastructure for a functioning search and the economy. and it would be an incentive to produce more cycle and less home for plastics. ringback ready europe is aiming high,
2:55 pm
we are reviewing and revising the legislation on 4 contact materials. and there we will look at a better alignment with the chemicals legislation and their particular chemical strategy for sustainability did commissions working on to deal with the most most hazardous substances? probably substances with d, so underground disruptive properties will face very tough legislation and may only be used if, if that will be essential in the future. we need to have a high level of transparency. we need to have a better level of control. what substances are actually being used many promises for the future, but the clock is ticking and legislation takes time or across
2:56 pm
the board legislation is necessary for real results, as known as low as different from country to country. they will be circumvented for profit and to the detriment of the environment and human health. at the beginning of 2022, un member states agreed to develop a binding international treaty. the agenda included the limitation of plastic production, the regulation of ingredients and their environmental impact. in addition to health and social issues, the main focus was on implementing the produce of pays principal. the poor countries need support to develop an environmentally friendly waste management system. most importantly, plastic consumption must be drastically reduced. best replacement for food packaging is no free packaging. and that actually means sifting the whole way that
2:57 pm
the business models are designed and even the types of products that people consume . so i think the, the best that people can do for their own health is to consume less processed foods to consume locally, produce food and does off foods that don't need a lot of packaging is we could focus on on high quality plastics on site plastics without hospital chemicals and move away from the really cheap types and those single these type of things. but i could definitely be hook for plastics which would definitely not be impossible. but that needs to be a when and that needs to be an accept. those buddies might be, for example, more in the 1950. he's idealistic vision of a world with a search and a plastic economy has failed. the consequences of the plastic virus has major challenges for today's to so a t a rethink is necessary as,
2:58 pm
as legislation to protect the environment and human health for future generations. the drama specialist operating so makers are becoming more innovative. this make everything by default sent from the dell instead, there's a major market for, for to send them up because audiences one more will show you how they create the on 3 magic. and you enjoy this 77 percent in 30 minutes on the w actually ride through the guides know the way around
2:59 pm
the is strictly scientific truth, some pretty key places. curiosity is we tried tomorrow today in 90 minutes on d. w, the shape crises, every single connection mapped out shows the geophysical reality, the on the board is what makes things the way they are mapped out. navigating a changing world. now on youtube, the, the, the,
3:00 pm
this is dw news lives from the atlanta, as well as deputy the to says the group is ready for an is ready ground invasion into lab and on is message system forces comes as more as randy attacks are reported across 11 on including the foster parent as tried to hit central by roots since the start, the car and complex also coming up on the program officer is far right. freedom policy celebrates of taking the most votes and parliamentary elections. its leader says the victory, his stuff is a new era. he wants to be australians chanc flush like forming a new government flow, be easy and the venice.
11 Views
Uploaded by TV Archive on
![](http://athena.archive.org/0.gif?kind=track_js&track_js_case=control&cache_bust=352956769)