agreed rach rex and now us present, joe biden, whose role that support phone is right in the attack on iran's nuclear facilities. so what will israel do next? i'm feel go in the name and this is the day the i would any will view. we ask you, faith, we talk to you and what with any nation do a 100 or balise between those were raining down on your see billions will be discussing it is fairly all 7 of us, 3 that are right on the un security call. see, because of the main pro, lies you to, to united the space, obstruction of effort decision it size time to stop the sickening cycle of escalation up that escalation that he was living the people of the me,

of the least right over the police. also on the day striking union workers shut down ports along the us east coast, potentially affecting up to hall of north america's maritime trade. workers want more pay and more importantly, job security are all we're asking for is our fair share. we want to key language in the contract that prohibits automation because what we don't want is we don't want robots doing our job. welcome to the day benjamin netanyahu has promised that the wrong will pay. and that to ron has made what he called a big mistake is ready. prime minister was speaking, following around the largest ever mist cyber attack against this country. just as the tackles are prompted, former prime minister enough tommy bennett to post on x. we must act now to destroy

iran's nuclear program. it's central energy facilities and to fatally cripple list hatteras regime. members of the un security council have condemn the spiraling violence in the middle east and emergency session of the council discuss measures to de escalate. the conflict between israel. iran and the round back has been out militia. the fear it is without such a move. the conflict could envelop the region 2 state solution here and these randy and in rainy an un, i'm baset as a drastic a security council. it'd be clue. isabel will defend itself. we will act and let me assure you, the consequences. why don't we face for other options, would be far greater than the good eval i've imagined. let me ask, we cancel and being dialed. i would any of you react, you phase, we set you on a truck. what would any nation do if hundreds of ballistic missiles were raining

down on your civilians? you all a cities your place of worship is why it has no intention to posting peace or assist for you. so it was typically the un security policy that has remained for the lies due to the united states of suction of an effective decision. by despite the unwavering support provided by the united states, united kingdom and so thing west and the states reason why it has given a carte blanche to disagree as if to always vision for all the source of sinister behavior. oh, so waiting to see how is ralph does in fact respond to change. things you may need miss on attack is real how to employ every element of it. sophisticated defense systems on tuesday, against reporting more than $180.00 ballistic missiles and $8.00 to pay to have been largely successful. school was severely damaged and these around sense some

fits and bases were here, but no casualties have been reported that westbank. i also, i was just, however, reported that a palestinian had been killed in the occupied temperature. many of us would have heard of israel and don't design to intercept, show range rockets up to 70 kilometers away. but the defense system also includes david's sleigh, which is built to intercept medium range myself up to 300 kilometers away. like those used by has bella and 11 on israel to the defense systems also include the arrow to and arrows 3 interceptors develop to engage medium to long range, missiles light, the ballistic myself. i used by ron, i wrote 3 off rates outside the atmosphere and has the longest range. drawing me down from washington, d. c is shown shake from the center for strategic and international studies where he conducts research into missiles and defense, nuclear weapons at defense,

nuclear weapons and emerging technologies. welcome to d. w. how testing was saturday nights attacked for israel, the ad defend systems as well. it looks like that the defense was successful. this was, as you had already mentioned, the large barrage of ballistic missiles were seeing reports of about a 180 ballistic missiles coming in. there was less warning time as compared to a previous iranians, drake, that took place in april. so that made it a little bit harder for these defense to take up to be prepared. but again, as you had mentioned, were not seen reports of casualties. the damage to infrastructure to this point seems minimal. and so it seems that this has been fairly effective for a wrong i'm and given that that was so few missiles go through and so

little damage was done. do we presume that iran was holding back? or it's simply not that big a military threat, but i wouldn't definitely wouldn't wanna say that it isn't a militarized threat. this was a, some of a decent number of missiles, 180 or so. but iran has hundreds, if not thousands of missiles that could range to israel. so this is a smaller part. it is a one way of attacking in and saying, sending a message really that hey, if you continue to go against our interest, if you continue to fight and gaza continued to have your plans to impede a southern loving on that we will go forward and we will increase the risk award that we are willing to go to the bank of war if necessary. don't tell us about these missiles, is iran producing them at themselves or sourcing them from elsewhere?

are you running missile capability is pretty sophisticated at this point. this is one very important element of their front oscar, which is why they're really not willing to give it up in the arms control negotiations. they had gotten some no house in the north koreans years ago, but since they've really been developing their own arsenal and improving on earlier derivatives. so we've seen, for example, the email then from shock or a favor shock or missiles that were using this latest attack. those are further improvements upon missiles that they had already developed earlier, and their claims in a rainy and state media that a new hypersonic, fafsa to ms saw, was part of a tuesdays at a time. what can you tell us about that? and whether indeed it's a particularly effective the term hypersonic has become a bit of

a buzz word kind of something that people are labeling a lot of their missiles when it's not exactly true. a hypersonic missile? yes. does travel 5 times the speed of sound, of mach 5 or, or greater? you can technically apply this to a lot of ballistic missiles, a lot of missiles they're ranging far enough into the atmosphere that when they come down, they are going at that speed. however, we typically use this term for missiles that mattress go at that speed, but are also maneuverable. so it's a bit of a misnomer for iran and for the who would even human for example, to call their missiles hypersonic. right. i'm the world of course is now waiting for is riley responds to a tuesday night attack. what do you think israel is most likely target if, when it decides to fatalities a very hard to say,

i think we're all trying to figure this house. uh, the us policy makers are applying some pressure likely to a stop a large is really retaliation. but from what we've seen from is really leadership. they are prepared to attack in much more force than we have seen in their response in april, in which they haven't really destroyed. and ronnie, air defense battery, which was seen as quite limited. and it's major interesting to, to say today that's a present bite and i said that he would not support any is riley strike on iran's dukes nuclear sites. in response to this attack, a clear line that from the west, the president at a, against an ally who is quite frequently disregarded his advice. yeah, i think it's very notable. the us has tried to set some,

maybe not red lines, but some guidance for is really actions in the past year is real and always gone forward and agree to those guidelines. you know, whether it's us calls for a cease fire and gaza, or for limited action against has belong loving on israel has been pursuing max most aims. and so it remains the question if it will pursue maximus, foreign policy maxed most aggression against iran. in this case, the hope is for the us and for a lot of others is that israel will respond perhaps more than it did in april, but still now strikes something as critical as it runs a nuclear facilities control control. your thanks for take us through about sean shake from the center for strategic and international studies. thank you. as

well, so far international efforts have had little success and bringing an end to the fighting in the region. now, much of the focus is on urging restraint. as an emergency meeting of the one security council, a secretary general antonio could tatters pleading for an entr what to call be deadly cycle of tit for top violence. it signed to stop the sickening cycle of escalation of that escalation that he was leaving the people of the me of the leaves strides over the cliff. it's jessica relation is sort of as a pretty fix for the next. we must never lose sight of the 3 men to install. this is no way that these going conflict is taking on civilians and we cannot look away from systematic violations of international humanitarian law. we're down here at das, a k as a senior fellow at the university of california, los angeles, a buckle center for international relations,

a welcome to the w. whether you see child striking back 1st as well. i think your previous gas laid it out. i, there's a, a full menu of options from a more extensive response which could target a variety of iranian nuclear sites. military sites. i or gc personnel, which is real, has been targeting over many months now, but it to possibly assassinations, even a political leaders. but i think, you know, given the kind of momentum this release of had a caps by then this raleigh killing you, everything is on the table that said, i think that there is very good reason to believe that israel strongly be encouraged by the americans. president biden just indicated the us would not welcome an attack on iranian nuclear sites to the us does not want to see this, we're expanded, but i think even from the as really perspective of given that wall,

this was a serious missile attack. they are not necessarily looking for a direct full fledged war with the wrong. there was limited damage and, and, and you know, casualties on these really side. so hopefully the aim is to have a proportionate attack somewhere along the lines of what we saw last april, limited to military sites. from the outside. it looks as though, well, israel has its hands full and couldn't handle more escalation with what's going on in the lab. and on an a garza and iran as well. is that the case? well, it isn't both my front door at this point. so talk of having this more contained in gaza, which was the hope early on, but as clearly not succeeded. israel has tremendous military capabilities, tremendous intelligence capabilities. it has demonstrated those in the last weeks and months. and so it could,

can theoretically handle this multi front war. but it's going to face the limits. it's going to come with a very high price. and at the moment, israel may not, you know, feel they have paid significant cost for these engagements, but we already see with its invasion and love and on the 8 idea of soldiers were just killed. i think yesterday or today i, once you enter a lebanese terrain, things get very difficult. israel hasn't finished its war in gaza, continues to have very difficult time trying to ultimately and then definitively defeat him off. so war with a ron opening another front is not exactly as easy as some may take us not go at stain, foreign affairs and say, but anyway, nothing youngers government appears to be aiming to create a new reality on all of is rounds for this just explained to us that what you think

they think about new reality will look like yeah, i think it's very important to try to understand the as really psyche right now because regardless of what they, what we think there's a strong motivation, a mom and this is across the political spectrum in israel, not as permanent or not on yahoo, but of the defense and security establishment. in fact, the popular view is that after october 7th, and the trauma of that attack on israel now i, unbelievably a year ago just about there is incense and israel catching live and manage the threats on its borders and deal with containment strategy that it needs to take the fight to the enemy and ultimately have decisive military winds. and so this has increased this really risk taking. this is we've seen this play out of these multiple theaters, but we'll see if it plays out with the ron. as we wait for him is really response, but there is a sense that israel needs to kind of turn the tables on the pressure is it's based

a certainly in the north there's a lot of consensus because there is a need or feeling that the as really need to get the 10s of thousands of his release who continue to be displaced from the north back into their homes. so i think that this is all combining, in addition to some ideological motivations of some members of the current israeli government to take this opportunity to seize more territory in the west bank is all leading to a very extensive, an expansion expansive is really strategy on all of it's worse, and i appreciate your response back and i took care, but that sounds like a new, that new reality sounds like a return to the sort of constant wool that we saw in the seventy's the yeah, it's the real worry that, you know, instead of this very much hope for day after and the misery and tragedy of, of, of the gods, the attack, and then the horrible board that's and folded this past year. that instead of kind

of this better day and a prosperous said, and better built middle east people today in washington are still talking about re shaping them. at least, you know, we've seen lessons from the past and of how these ambitions can fall by the wayside . and so unfortunately, if you're talking about introductory, that's leading to re occupations, which is, is where we're headed, that's what i just wrote about. i hope we don't get there, but if we are headed there, i think that this is 1st and foremost to the detriment of israel security, but certainly for regional stability, us interest in global interest. so i, it is a very boring a trajectory, but it is not a recipe for peace. it is a recipe for continued conflict, which is we should all be, i hope, working against. and i did want to touch briefly on this, the ultimate, that you mentioned that if it's relations with the united states and being tired as it were to this country. but if the, if, if your correct is just intend on creating massive trouble,

the very troublesome part of the world. yeah, well look, we're not there yet. this is an article kind of speculating where we are ahead of your, one of this terrible war. and you know, there is good reason to believe we can still hopefully contain things and get to that better day after informing us perspective. it certainly going to keep backing israel's legitimate defense needs. that is not good and, but i think there will start being more questions asked in washington, and frankly around the globe about israel continues to take this further, especially when it comes to occupation in the west bank when it comes to incursions until 11 on should they become permanent, hopefully not we're early days yet. and if there's not a real genuine is really acceptance of the need for a 2 state solution and a need for a real day after and god the that leads to a viable palestinian state. i think tensions are going to continue to rise both with washington and other western allies. okay,

so you've given us most to think about as we thank you for that. that's okay. from the university of california. thank you so much. thank you. of the remaining in the united states, a strike by port was suspended to shipping operations along the entire east coast adults between the workers union and port of this every 40 to be at a standstill was a seeking a wage increase and job protection guarantees. and the face of concerns about or summation, it's estimated that hall of north america's marathon tre, passes through the effective ports. one estimates as the strike could cost for us to come and re $5000000000.00 a day, some business days, according to president biden, to invoke and buy even lo, authorizing the president to order a cooling off period in the strike. well, jason miller is a professor at michigan state university, an internship of the department of supply chain management. welcome to the data

that you didn't invite you. they have the international longshoremen's association . so it shuts down old ports from maine to texas. a 12 i want, i am on tuesday and this was after rejected. the employee is supposed to be final offer. but on monday, the us mt assign reliance which represents the shipping from support associations and the reading terminal offer. it says they said that final offer was 50 percent, a triple employs pension contributions and strong to health care options. which sounds like an amazing deal. you know? yeah, that's where we're at right now. is us, amex has put with their requirement is their best offer on the table the i l. a. the longshoremen union in question has rejected that. and so we are now in day 2 of a strike that is affecting all container shipping operations on the east and gulf coast ports, as well as what we call roll on roll off operations which concerns finished motor

vehicles, construction equipment and farm machines. right. so what's wrong with the explained to us what, what do you need? just think about a 50 percent increase in pay increase help with that health care increase pension contributions. that sounds like a deal that a lot of units would bite your alma for i can't speak for the union on the front. i know in the united states there has been frustration looking at record container operator profitability, especially in 21 and 2022. i think there is probably some biased by the fact that the united states is not a major player and the global container shipping operations. so there's the sense of foreign companies making profits and not essentially sharing those with american workers. i think that's where the union's at was the thought process, but again,

i can't speak for them in that regard. find florida. part of this is also said to be about the technology or summation machines, audio visual intelligence and all that stuff. according to the iron. i vice president hubbard who will him outlining some more of his objections and then come back to you what it makes it as if the family is what amazing doesn't pay taxes. these are the things that members would make their livelihood off today. so we need to make sure we're protected in our jobs. though, we know that this automated service like a rather damn, and places like that with people sit behind the computers and run the machines. we don't want that here it is out loud and we've done 5. well, jason miller, the steering service, coming an organization and i are on stock mobile. they certainly as you look around the, the, the world. it's a fact of life. no, it is. and in my state of michigan where auto, you know, auto assembly, so critical, we have half the number of people today working in the auto plants that we did 25

years ago. and half the number of people working in parts suppliers that we did 25 years ago. but yet, nationally, as a country, we actually make more auto parts and more vehicles today than we did 25 years ago. and so the um, you know, the houston gulf coast port certain somewhat of unique situation that unlike an industry like automotive, which has been a huge adopt, proven, does of industrial robots and various technologies. there really is no substitution and you're not facing global competition. but the challenges to is that automation, if it does take jobs away, that impact is felt very strong locally. but the benefits of improved automation would say more efficient container operations and maybe slightly lower transportation costs. there really is very sort of diffused out to the overall population. and so i think that that's, you know, where the union is out on that attitude. we are going to click mention of,

of lots of them could you, could you give us an idea of how organization affects it about the dodge for your, its largest. it is so if you look at rotterdam or any of the major ports and let's say a much more automated gate, clarence is going to be done automatically. you don't have somebody here check in a box and you know, making sure that that is the appropriate truck. a lot of container movements themselves are going to be done automatically by machinery rather than by drivers. and so these are some of the, i'm going to say more basic technologies. we're looking at 9 even a, all right, because we're not even in the beginning of the conversation with that yet in the us courts. and so how long do you think it is likely before consume is see some sort of effect, some sort of inconvenience it won't be this week, it'll take at least a strike running into the end of next week. but to me is sort of the week that's

maker break for a lot of things is 1014. and that's just because as a strike takes place, the amount of disruption starts increasing at an increasing rate as this goes longer. as an example right now, we have about 30 container ships waiting to be on loaded off of these ports. that number will be up to over 200 by the middle of next week, and the number is going just right. okay. good. talking to thank you for talking to say about supply chain export jackson miller from michigan state university. thank you. and that's today as well, same time, same place, some of the

rug, the environment, trends, technologies come is digitalization tops new market, new media. the world is accelerating the opportunity to try new things. take flights with d, w. 's business magazine, made in germany next on d. w. women holding their own nobody could have imagined female manages, tend to manager the yeah. and ritual roles,

the work in a tricky environment. and demanding job settings based on the ground next door. and i thought of you out in 60 minutes on d, w, the the fleming range, i mean south watermark deforestation in the rain forest continued carbon dioxide emissions have risen again. the people of the world are we? what impact the biggest change doesn't happen the

make up your own mind? made the do you think that money rules and not just in the business world, but on the political side to take banking local, jp morgan. fortunately, as vanderbilt with his railway empire to major american financial figures with both monopolies and influence on the governments. and today is take coons likewise make generous donations and the hope of helping the candidate who best serve their interest when an election. also on this edition of made trading tear of the difference between trump and harris.