patience and emergency mazing of the un security council sold a representative trade angry rhetoric, and now us present, joe biden, his role that support for his right of the attack on iran's nuclear facilities. so what will israel do next? i'm feel gale in abundance, and this is the day the i would, any of you react, you phase. we've talked to you about that. what would any nation do it? 100 or ballistic missiles were raining down on you all to see billions will be discussed with is fairly all 7 of us, 3 on the un security can see because of the main to lies due to the united states obstruction of effort to the decision. it size time to

stop the sickening cycle of escalation up that escalation that he was leaving the people of the middle east side over the police. also on the day striking union workers shut down ports along the us east coast, potentially affecting up to hall of north america's maritime trade. workers want more pay and more importantly, job security. all we're asking for is our fair share. we want to keep language in the contract that prohibits automation because what we want is we don't want robots doing our job. welcome to the day, benjamin netanyahu has promised that the wrong will pay. and that to ron has made what he called a big mistake is right. the prime minister was speaking, following around the largest ever me cyber attack against this country. just as

attack also prompted former prime minister enough tommy bennett to post on x. we must act now to destroy iran's nuclear program. it's central energy facilities and to fatally cripple this terrorist regime, or members of the un security council have condemned the spiraling violence in the middle east and emergency session of the council discussed measures to de escalate . the conflict between israel, iran and the round back has bought melisha. the fan is that without such a move, the conflict could envelop the region to stay here, these riley and in rainy and un, i'm pass it as a drastic a security council. would you be clear? isabel will defend itself. we will act and let me assure you, the consequences why don't we face for other options would be far greater than the good eval i've imagined. let me ask the console and the entire world. i would, any of you react, you face with such an attack?

what would any nation do if hundreds of ballistic missiles were raining down on your civilians? your cities, your place of worship is why it has no intention to postering peace or assist for ya. so it was typically the un security policy that has remained for the lies due to the united states obstruction of any effective decision by this, by the way, letting support provided by the united states, united kingdom. and so thing was in the states reason why it has given carte blanche to disagree as if to always vision for all the source of sinister behavior . also waiting to say how israel does in fact respond to tuesday evening in miss on attack israel. how to employ every element of it sophisticated defense systems on tuesday, against reporting more than $180.00 ballistic missiles and $8.00 to pay to have

been nicely successful. a school was severely damaged and these around says some fits and bases were here, but no casualties have been reported that westbank i also, i was just haven't reported that a palestinian had been killed in the occupied temperature. when i, many of us will have heard of israel and don't design to intercept, show range rockets up to 70 kilometers away. but the defense system also includes david's slate, which is built to intercept medium range myself up to 300 kilometers away, like those used by has bella and 11 on israel to the defense systems also include the arrow to and arrows 3 interceptors develop to engage medium to long range me, sounds like the ballistic themselves are used by ron r o 3 off rates outside the atmosphere and have the longest range are drawing me down from washington. d. c is shown shake from the center for strategic and

international studies where he conducts research into missiles and defense, nuclear weapons at defense, nuclear weapons and emerging technologies. welcome to dw, how testing was injured by nights attack for israel ad defend systems or well, it looks like that the defense was successful. this was, as you had already mentioned, a large barrage of ballistic missiles were seeing reports of about a 180 ballistic missiles coming in. there was less warning time as compared to a previous iranians, drake, that took place in april. so that made it a little bit harder for these defense to take up to be prepared. but again, as you had mentioned, were not seen reports of casualties. the damage to infrastructure to this point seems minimal. and so it seems that this has been fairly effective for a wrong i'm and given that that was so few missiles got through and so

little damage was done that we presume that iran was holding back. or it's simply not that big a military threat. why wouldn't definitely wouldn't why say that it isn't a military threat. this was a, some of a decent number of missiles, 180 or so. but iran has hundreds if not thousands of missiles that could range to israel. so this is a smaller part. it is a one way of attacking in and saying, sending a message really that hey, if you continue to go against our interest, if you continue to fight in gaza, continue to have your plans to impede a southern loven on that. we will go forward and we will increase the risk and board that we are willing to do to the brink of more if necessary. don't tell

us about these missiles. is iran producing them at themselves or sourcing them from elsewhere that you're running? a missile capability is pretty sophisticated at this point. this is one very important element of their front posture, which is why they're really not willing to give it up in arms control negotiations . they had gotten some no house in the north koreans years ago, but since they've really been developing their own arsenal and improving upon earlier derivatives. so we've seen, for example, the email then from shock or a favor shock or missiles that were using this latest attack. those are further improvements upon missiles that they had already developed earlier and their claims in a rainy and state media. the new hypersonic facet to me saw was part of a tuesdays at a time. what can you tell us about that?

and whether indeed it's a particularly effective the term hypersonic has become a bit of a buzz word kind of something that people are labeling a lot of their missiles when it's not exactly true. hypersonic missile, yes. does travel 5 times the speed of sound, of mach 5 or, or greater? you can technically apply this to a lot of ballistic missiles, a lot of missiles they're ranging far enough into the atmosphere that when they come down, they are going at that speed. however, we typically use this term for missiles that mattress go at that speed, but are also maneuverable. so it's a bit of a misnomer for iran and for the who would even human for example, to call their missiles hypersonic. right. i'm the world of course is now waiting for is riley responds to a tuesday night attack. what do you think israel is most likely talk?

it's if, when it decides to fatalities, it's very hard to say. i think we're all trying to figure this out as uh, the us policy makers are applying. some pressure is likely to a stop, a large is really retaliation. but from what we've seen from is really leadership. they are prepared to attack and much more force than we have seen in their response from april in which they have only destroyed and it running air defense battery, which was seen as quite limited in its major contrasting to, to say you today. that's a president bite and i said that he would not suppose any is riley strike on iran's duke's nucleus sites in response to this attack. a clear line that from the us that president at a, against an ally who is quite frequently disregarded his advice.

yeah, i think it's very notable the us has tried to set some, maybe not red lines, but some guidance for is really actions in the past year is real and always gone forward and agree to those guidelines. you know, whether it's us calls for a cease fire and gaza, or for limited action against has belong loving on israel has been pursuing maxed most aims. and so it remains the question if it will pursue maximus, foreign policy maxed most aggression against iran. in this case, the hope is for the us and for a lot of others is that israel will respond perhaps more than it did in april. but it's still not strikes something as critical as it runs the nuclear facilities control control. thanks for it. take us to about sean shake from the center for

strategic and international studies. thank you so well, so far into national efforts have had little success in bringing and, and to the fighting in the region. now much of the focus is on urging restraint. as an emergency meeting of the un security council, a secretary general antonia could tatters pleading for an end to what it colby deadly cycle of tit for tat violence. it sites time to stop the sickening cycle of escalation of that escalation that he was living the people of the me of the leaves strides over the cliff. it's jessica relation is set of as a pretty fix for the next. we must never lose sight of the 3 men to install. this is no way that these going to in conflict is taking on civilians. and we cannot walk away from systematic violations of international humanitarian law. well donna, das, a k as a senior fellow at the university of california, los angeles,

a buckle center for international relations, a welcome to the w. why do you see child striking back 1st as well? i think your previous gas laid it out. i. there is a, a full menu of options from a more extensive response which could target a variety of iranian nuclear sites. military sites. i or gc personnel, which is real, has been targeting over many months now, but it to possibly assassinations, even a political leaders. but i think, you know, given the kind of momentum these really have had a cap for them, this rolla killing you, everything is on the table that said, i think that there is very good reason to believe that israel strongly be encouraged by the americans. president biden just indicated the us would not welcome an attack on iranian nuclear sites to the us does not want to see this

works banded. but i think even from the as really perspective of given that wall, this was a serious missile attack. they are not necessarily looking for a direct full fledged war with the wrong. there was limited damage and, and, and you know, casualties on the is really side. so hopefully the aim is to have a proportionate attack somewhere along the lines of what we saw last april, limited to military sites, from the outside. it looks as though, well, israel has its hands full and couldn't handle more escalation with what's going on in lebanon. and a garza and iran as well, is that the case as well? it isn't both my front war at this point. so talk of having this more contained in gaza, which was the hope early on, but as clearly not succeeded. israel has tremendous military capabilities, tremendous intelligence capabilities. it has demonstrated those in the last week

than months. uh so it could, can theoretically handle this multi front war. but it's going to face the limits. it's going to come with a very high price. and at the moment, israel may not, you know, feel they have paid significant cost for these engagements. but we already see with its invasion and loving on a 8 idea of soldiers were just killed. i think yesterday or today, once you enter lebanese terrain, things get very difficult. israel hasn't finished its war in gaza, continues to have very difficult time trying to ultimately and then definitively defeat him off. so war with a ron opening another front is not exactly as easy as some may take years, not go at stain, foreign affairs and say, but anyway, ness and youngers government appears to be aiming to create a new reality on all of israel for which is just explained to us that what you

think they think about new reality will look like or yeah, i think it's very important to try to understand the as really psyche right now because regardless of what, think what we think there is a strong motivation, a mom and this is across the political spectrum in israel, not as prime minister, not on yahoo, but the defense and security establishment. in fact, the popular view is that after october 7th, and the trauma of that attack on israel now i, unbelievably a year ago just about there is a fence that israel catching live and manage the threats on its borders and deal with containment strategy that it needs to take the fight to the enemy and ultimately have decisive military winds. and so this has increased this really risk taking this as we've seen this play out of these multiple theaters. but we'll see if it plays out with the ron. as we wait for him is really response, but there is

a sense that israel needs to kind of turn the tables on the pressure is it's based a certainly in the north there's a lot of consensus because there is a need or feeling that the is really need to get the 10s of thousands of his release to continue to be displaced from the north back into their homes. so i think that this is all combining, in addition to some ideological motivations of some members of the current is really government to take this opportunity to seize more territory in the west bank is all leading to a very extensive, an expansion. expansive is really strategy on all of it's worse, and i appreciate your your, you were speculate to care, but that sounds like a new, that new reality sounds like a return to the sort of constant goal. but we saw in the seventy's or yeah, it's the real worry that you know, instead of this very much hope for day after and the misery, a tragedy of, of, of the gods attack. and then the horrible board that's and folder this past year.

that instead of kind of this better day and a prosperous said, and better built middle east people today in washington are still talking about re shaping them. at least, you know, we've seen lessons from the past of, of how these ambitions can fall by the wayside. and so unfortunately, if you're talking about introductory, that's leading to re occupations, which is, is where we're headed, that's what i just wrote about. i hope we don't get there, but if we are headed there, i think that this is 1st and foremost to the detriment of israel security, but certainly for regional stability, us interest in global interest. so i, it is a very boring a trajectory, but it is not a recipe for peace. it is a recipe for continued conflict, which is we should all be, i hope, working against. and i did want to touch briefly on this, the ultimate, that you mentioned that of its relations with the united states as being tight as it were to this country. that if the, if,

if you're correct is just the intent on creating massive trouble. the very trouble, some parts of the world. yeah. well look, we're not there yet. this is an article kind of speculating where we are ahead it, you're one of this terrible war. uh and you know, there is good reason to believe we can still hopefully contain things and get to that better day after informing us perspective. it's certainly going to keep backing israel's legitimate defense needs. that is not good and, but i think there will start being more questions asked in washington and, and a frankly around the globe about israel continues to take this further, especially when it comes to occupation in the west bank when it comes to incursions until 11 on should they become permanent? hopefully not, we're early days yet. and if there's not a real genuine is really acceptance of the need for 2 state solution and the need for a real day after and god the that leads to a viable palestinian state. i think tensions are going to continue to rise both

with washington and other western allies. okay, so you've given as much to think about as we thank you for that as a k from the university of california. thank you so much. thank you. the while remaining in the united states, a strike by port was suspended to shipping operations along the entire east coast. adults between the workers union and port out is that reported to be at a standstill was a seeking a wage increase in job protection guarantees. in the face of concerns about the organization. it's estimated that ha of north america's marathon tre passes through the affected ports. one estimate says the strike could cost for us to come to be $5000000000.00 a day, some business days, according to president biden, to invoke him by even low authorizing the presidents to order a cooling off period in the strike. well jason miller is

a professor at michigan state university, an internship of the department of supply chain management. welcome to the dfw that you didn't invite you. they have the international longshoremen's association. so it shuts down old ports from maine to texas. a 12 i one i am on tuesday and this was after rejected. the employee is supposed to be final offer. but on monday, the us mt assign reliance which represents the shipping from support associations and the reading terminal offer. it says they said that final offer was 50 percent, a triple employee as pension contributions and stronger health care options. which sounds like an amazing deal. you know, um yeah, that's where we're at right now. is us, amex has put what their requirement is their best offer on the table the i l. a. the longshoremen union in question has rejected that. and so we are now in day 2 of a stride, and that is affecting all container shipping operations on the east and gulf coast

ports, as well as what we call roll on roll off operations, which concerns finished motor vehicles, construction equipment and farm machinery, right? so what's wrong with the explained to us? what do you need to think about a 50 percent increase in pay increase help with that health care increase pension contributions. that sounds like a deal that a lot of units would bite your alma for i can't speak for the union on that front. i know in the united states there has been frustration looking at record container operator profitability, especially in 21 and 2022. i think there is probably some biased by the fact that the united states is not a major player and the global container shipping operations. so there's the sense of foreign companies making profits and not essentially sharing those with american

workers. i think that's where the union's at was the thought process, but again, i can't speak for them in that regard. find sort of part of this is also said to be about the technology or summation machines, audio visual intelligence and all that stuff. according to the i vice president hubbard who will hit him outlining some more of his objections and then come back to you what it makes it as if the families what amazing doesn't pay taxes. these are the things that members would make the livelihood off today. so we need to make sure we're protected in our jobs, though, we know that this automated service like it rather damn, and places like that with people sitting behind the computers and running machines . we don't want that here, it is out loud and we've done 5. well jason miller, the steering service coming and organization and i are on stock mobile. they certainly as you look around the the, the world, it's a fact of life. no, it isn't in my state of michigan where auto, you know,

auto assembly is so critical. we have half the number of people the day working in the auto plants that we did 25 years ago and half the number of people working in parts suppliers that we did 25 years ago. but yet, nationally, as a country, we actually make more auto parts and more vehicles today than we did 25 years ago. and so the um, you know, the houston gulf coast ports here in somewhat of unique situation that unlike an industry like automotive, which has been a huge adopt, proven, does of industrial robots and various technologies. there really is no substitution and you're not facing global competition. but the challenges to is that automation, if it does take jobs away, that impact is felt very strong locally. but the benefits of improved automation would say more efficient container operations and maybe slightly lower transportation costs. there really is very sort of diffused out to the overall population. and so i think the dance, you know,

where the union is out on that attitude. we were in the clear mention of, of lots of them could you, could you give us an idea of how organization affects it, about dodge for and who are its largest to go. so if you look at rotterdam or any of the major ports, and let's say asia much more automated gate, clarence is going to be done automatically. you don't have somebody here checked in a box and you know, making sure that that is the appropriate truck. a lot of container movements themselves are going to be done automatically by machinery rather than by drivers. and so these are some of the, i'm going to say more basic technologies. we're looking at 9 even a i, because we're not even in the beginning of the conversation with that yet in the us courts. and so how long do you think it is likely before consume is see some sort of effect, some sort of inconvenience it won't be this week,

it'll take at least a strike running into the end of next week. but to me is sort of the week that's maker break for a lot of things is 1014. and that's just because as a strike takes place, the amount of disruption starts increasing at an increasing rate as this goes longer. as an example, right now, we have about 30 container ships waiting to be on loaded off of these ports. that number will be up to over 200 by the middle of next week, and the number is going just right. okay. good talking to thank you for talking to say that supply chain export jackson miller from michigan state university. thank you and that's today as well. same time, same place, some of the, the,

into the conflicts with sarah kelly's ukraine says that a threesome encouragement of russian territory has made a mockery of fruitless red lines. and that the west should go haul in to help when the war i discussed the options with a finish for administer alina about. tony, thanks for having me. so how does she see the prospect of turning the side in bushes and phrasing of ukraine conflict? the next on d, w. magic as the power of

these trees have branches that reach into the sky. and there are numerous trunks to help them survive, drought, and other host, and the consent to the one preacher is now threatening to very huge. this to you about the universe of it's in 45 minutes on the w, the in the 1st year of the war in ukraine, a john, and as soon langan reports it from the russian occupies don't. vast regions, they're still good. what else to do is get to stop by tomorrow, and you've got a rad luke, as well, and usually an accessible to western media. a closer look, and that's

a must of this more of a tricia. the ukraine's move, the other side starts october 26th on dw, the ukraine says that it's recent incursion into russian territory has made a mockery of pollutants, red lines. and that the west should go all in to help him win the war. i discussed the options with the finish for administer. alina val towed in on conflicts don't finland, knows a lot about red lines from russia across one last year, when it decided to advance in the decades of neutrality, in favor of joining nato. and given its expansive border, defending against aggression from moscow, has always been a cor focus. so how does she see the prospect of turning the tide and rushes invasion of ukraine, and what other threats does she see on the horizon? for example, in her own back yard the arctic foreign minister.