the significant risk of human extinction from it. absolutely. isis. our series continued d. w. ukraine says that its recent incursion into russian territory has made a mockery of pollutants, red lines, and that the west should go all in to help it when the war. i discussed the options with the finish for administer. alina val towed in on conflicts down. finland knows a lot about red lines from russia across one last year, when it decided to advance in the decades of neutrality, in favor of joining nato. and given its expansive border, defending against aggression from moscow, has always been a cor focus. so how does she see the prospect of turning the tide and rushes invasion of ukraine, and what other threats does she see on the horizon? for example, in her own back yard, the arctic foreign minister, alina vault, and,

and welcome to conflicts own. thank you so much. i want to begin with ukraine, because you are a strong supporter of the country's defense. as ukraine pushes to hold onto the summertime gains and rushes curse region, doesn't it show the pollutants? red lines might not be as red as he wants to west to believe. i think it shows exactly that. and i think in the west, in general, we perhaps not just an over the course of the past 2 and a half years with a full scale of other people's gay. what would that, that's brushing is waging any crane. but also before that we have perhaps been too hesitant to believe and stick to uh, values and know what the truth face. um and that is obviously relying on the international aerospace, the, and, and the you and job that for instance. and also in this regard, we do see that in some instances, the rhetoric we hear from the russians is much more aggressive than what they are really intending to pull for. so given that,

how far would finland's be willing to go to support ukraine? because i mean you, you've previously said that the finished position is clear, and i'm quoting you here. you've said that we are not right now sending any troops and not willing to discuss that is the day fast approaching when you're going to have to discuss it. as an, as dense has not changed in that regard. but to, for instance, what comes to the military equipment, the defense material, damnation, we have a sense to ukraine. we haven't set any constraints on the usage other than of course, international law and the un shots. and i think this is very important to keep in mind because us, who are we issue uh, helping ukraine and also your credit. and it has the little full right to defend itself for as long as and while we keep it the reality of international law, then there shouldn't be any red line. and nothing to be afraid about. you haven't

put any direct geographical restrictions on the weapon tree, but you know, your, some of your nato partners and allies have ukraine meantime is saying that it needs the green light from countries to use their donate a weapons inside russia showed your allies and partners lift those bands i can always speak on behalf of payment and payment uh, from the, from the out. so it has not set any constraints on the material. but i do know that some of our friends and allies do have some concerns. but again, for as long as we remain in the area stipulated by international law and human shots that like we are right. but you've previously said that it's an issue that you're taking up with your fellow nato's natal alliance ministers. a foreign minister is, excuse me, what are other leaders and for him is just telling you when you take this up with them as well, i'm not commenting on their behalf, but the message is clear. and i have also taken this up by actually with,

with my colleagues, and i just hope that that, that we will be able to help ukraine in the best possible way. put this into the big picture for us because you've said that you shouldn't rule anything out and long term, as we've heard, including sending troops is in the risk that at some point, it will be too late. yes, well we of quotes and i'm scrutinizing the situation um on a daily basis to get uh with, with the allies and partners. but again, this is not the situation when it would be about sending troops to ukraine. this has been something from interest is considering at the moment, or of causing the long term. it's important that we don't rule everything out. on the contrary it's, it's very important that we speak to a narrative which is clear. and our strategy that we help you crane to has the

low full rights to defend itself. and based on the do and chart, we also have the right to, to help you crane to defend itself it's, it's territory and it's silver angie. so whatever is needed now, and in the future, of course, we will have to us to be a flexible enough, jo, enough to, to see what, what it is exactly that is needed. i'd like to ask you further about um, you know, some of your allies biggest concerns, which is the threat of contagion. we've seen recently, nato members, romania and lafayette. and they have just reported russian charles, crashing after breaching their air space is the risk of drawn nato nations into the conflict increasing right now. well, you know, um, so far, i know just in the past 2 and a half years. and so, i mean this time, but also years before to certainly be in russia to,

has been responsible for this escalation. ukraine has been trying to co exist with it's much larger, neva and stop and carefully evolving itself into a proper democracy. you know, gets rid of corruption and everything, which of course takes a long time after such a long time and the soviet union and everything. um and uh, i think we should not consider so easy way to take this sort of to blame on us brush of course has been using this narrative for, for a just stuff. it's the west to, you know, edge to close on a to was, was that was coming to close to close to his board. but at the same time, we haven't been threatening russia. nato certainly does not taking you countries by force, but it's, it's countries who democratically just wants to join. and at the same time that we

obviously we have seen that. so. so doing this for a now, especially in a well recently, in the past weeks and, and even days um, some of 5 rushes material has landed basically in, in, in a to a conference. so this is extremely important that we take the seriously, we investigated these mattress and then we react to decisively. let's talk a little bit more about that reaction because there are calls for nato to act and jointly to counter such air and persians. i'd like to take it to something that poland has previously said, that in other countries bordering ukraine, have a duty to shoot down incoming russian missiles before they enter their aerospace. so nato has rejected this proposal. it has said it risk the alliance, becoming part of the conflict which showed nato. do. this is something we are carefully now investigating. and nature will of course and comment

when, when the time comes, but so far, this is indeed the case. but at the same time, each nation is also responsible for protecting its, its own h. s. based on and, and the security of, of $5.60. so in this regard, we really need to take this situation very, very seriously, but it goes back to, you know, the joint approach and, and, you know, how much on side and how united nato nato allies are in any potential response. um and, you know, nato allies have said previously, we have to do whatever we can to help you crane and whatever we can to avoid escalation. and you know, the question is, is that still a realistic approach given the current set of conditions on the ground, that certainly is still land remains the, the, the approach that's also a feeling this is supporting. but of course, what is debatable and is debatable every day. also, as the conflict evolves,

is that what should be counted as a step towards escalation? because a said it is not to do a crane and not us. the other countries who have been helping ukraine in, in these 2 and a half years to not being responsible for the escalation, it's been prussia. so, i'd like to ask you briefly about the sense of resolve about support of ukraine among your nato allies. you are a member of the us. we've mentioned you're, you're a very strong supporter of ukraine. we have seen some cracks emerge in the united states. and uh, you know, uh, presidential candidate trump has suggested that he could hold the american aid. there's no guarantee meantime that harris can continue biden's policies on ukraine if she were to win the election. how could the europe maintain the level of support needed if necessary? because here in europe, you also have a situation where germany appears to be wavering amid

a budget crisis. how concerning is that for you? well, it's very concerning. and also in the middle, of course, we have been uh over the years, paying a high price for a security and defense. and now of course us as members and they to, we are investing in even heavy yeah. into it, in order to know to or not only keep safe ourselves, but also to be able to protect the entire alliance if need be. but the burden is, of course there. but at the same time, we need to understand that now citizens need to understand that there is no such thing as put us too many euro. so too many dollars for the security and for being able to protect the values which we at the end of the day, i want to be protecting. so it's democracy, the freedom rule of law and human rights effectively, and perhaps in finland because, well, we have been invited by russia in the past and,

and luckily after the 2nd world world war we were able to remain independent. and, but we do see what the difference is behind the border quotes and none of these values that we hold to um, uh, sake for it. so therefore, we know that we, you know, want to keep things as, as the on and therefore, so we feel very strong sympathy with the ukrainians who unfortunately haven't been independent for too long yet to really i have decided to, to war the way that they become appropriate democracy, you know, the day and the people kind of kind of live in freedom and according to the european way of life and so and so forth. so as i think it's actually my duty to keep on helping ukraine. so let's take it to, um, you know, uh your own security and the threat, the rush surprises because any pilot there,

they the fact that finland is taking this whole of society approach. and that you have a high level of readiness. you, you know how to, to, you have done it for, for many decades to deter the threat from russia. you've got this 1300 kilometers border. in fact, with the country. your intelligence agency is now saying that russia's actions remain the greatest threat to finland's national security. russia is treating finland, doesn't unfriendly states, and as a target for espionage and malign influence and activities. how do you see the challenges of living and this new system? now, we're poor relations with russia appear to be the, nor, unfortunately, it is russia who is responsible for, for the prostate and for fab relations. indeed with the full scale invasion of ukraine. um, well there's, there's no way that we can, for a go back. if i have that, but definitely not easily to, to any relations whatsoever. of course, the men just like any other european country in the past, say, 2 decades,

we hope that russia would finally also become a true democracy. we wanted to engage in trade and investment and we did that. unfortunately, nothing of that helped. and that is also very important that we realize what truly happened in the past 20 years. it was not the us who was responsible for, for the increased author retiree, and those or the, or the or autocratic evolution in, in russia. but it was very much putting himself. um, so certainly fealand has never threatened to russia. not as a neighbor, well and not in nature or without nato. we have only invested into i own defense, into terrence in order to stay safe. and what else be that or does it may, i mean you are, are, you are faced with these current conditions. you and your lithuanian neighbors meantime, or a warning in particular, the increasing hybrid attacks and recent months we're talking cyber attacks force

migration acts of sabotage. a few months ago, moscow laid out a plan to unilaterally withdraw its maritime borders in the baltic sea with both you and let the way nia, it. it quickly retracted that, but it's being seen as an attempt to so fear how much of a danger just briefly, due to hybrid attacks pose from russia for finland. i think the hybrid attacks and it's rich from those a very, very relevant. and unfortunately, we're not only talking about the rent and bucks, but also the really incidents of such attacks. but that's the only thing that i mean we are because of these attacks, not everywhere in europe. and if you really look at it into, into, or in more detail than you would see if that also happening in the u. s. and in africa with the military coups that, that russia is organizing. we have seen acts of sabotage. we have seen poisonings around, you know, just in the recent months,

but in the recent years. so effectively we are all affected by this aggression by russia. and therefore, i think it was extremely important that the summer and the washington saw me. we were able to find very strong wets, also in, in the hybrid domain, in, in the, in the proclamation of nature, effectively saying that, that such attacks could also, i want to focus lead to the basic activation of, of optical 5. right? but i want to focus on feelings, in particular because the instrument of instrument, instrumental, ization, excuse me, of migration is just one example of a hybrid attack. you have accused russia force migration in your border. and now to counteract that move, there is this new finish law, which is said to allow finish border guards to force migrate to an asylum seekers back into russia. you told the telegraph that it would only be used against microbes who have been quote, weaponized by moscow. how can you be so sure that it won't affect genuine asylum seekers? finland takes international law and obligations extremely seriously. well,

this law we, we talk to we, we have to, well drafted and, and implemented because we didn't have the tools sufficient to count this instrument to lies. migration as russia is organizing at that border. but at the same time, also this new law only allows for temporary closure of the, of the, of the sort of border asylum seeking processing stations. and also it's a geographically limited. and like, you know, did we have a bridge loan border with russia and we would always keep here um, some states gaping for, for asylum seeking. here's what the critics say. and i'd like to, i'd like to ask you to respond to it directly. you know, critics say that the law violates international migration law. it's such a dangerous precedent, you know, undermining access to asylum. ultimately, we have the went ape see are in a joint statement. i'm a see international,

the council of europe. all issuing statements of caution against you. this is finland your your country. the prides itself on rule of law and values. you spoke about it earlier. have you come down a slippery slope here? it's not the slippery slope at all. on the very contrary, unfortunately, international is you little haven't been dropped in a time where there was such a phenomenon like instrumental ice migration and or countries of the pot, this and allies. i've spoken to about this phenomena. everybody knows that finland and other bordering nations with the the brochure abilities in a very difficult situation. and in fact, not only for those countries who directly share border with, with, uh, rochelle butler, bruce. but it's obviously the entire shang, an area that is affected. and at the same time, these are exactly the same concerns shed by my colleagues also installed in europe

. because what we see with the destabilization act that the russia is organizing in say, west africa. one of the intention to say is exactly to instrumental ais migration. also towards, for example, let's take it back to finland. yeah. again, so that we can, we, i am as inputs. right. which is, yeah, that's what i'm thinking, this island again because, i mean here's what's being said specifically about about this law. it's been, it's been said that the russian objective is to make feeling look bad to basically present this dilemma where you have to choose between the media, border security and the values and the rules and the basis of your society. they've essentially been successful at this, haven't they? they have made finland look bad. yes, but um i, i wouldn't be so worried about this because i do know that, that you and organizations have to, of course, or rely on the existing conventions. but for instance, what we are now doing to get up with the again partners and allies,

is that we want to look into whether there was not perhaps a way to change is your or the international conventions. because that doesn't happen quickly. but the interpretation so that it could be in cases where, you know, if this is a, really, a, a strong, a case of instrumental us migration. that, that, that it could be treated as a fact that if a whole style country is trying to send people over that immediately and in a geographically lead me to a location that could go, there was not the right to seek asylum, but we would remain, or we would keep those stations open for seeking asylum somewhere else, and this is also the claimant would be doing. we have the law now in place, but we haven't used it yet. and for using the law or. oh,

really allowing our board or thoughts to um, to not people seek asylum. there is a very, very high head of for taking that thing to use. and secondly, countries like norway or, or some of the baltic countries at poland. all of these countries have been issued or have been a subject and the victim to this phenomenon over the course of the g. s and to every country has been treating it and in, in some way. and the norwegian model for us. this is very similar to the finish one . we thought it would be just better if we had to one model for, for every, every country. okay, we have, we have to move on unfortunately, because i want to get to the situation also in the arctic where there is fear of a potential spillover of rushes more in ukraine. a rush is making up nearly half of this zones geographically, but now it's encircled by 7 needle members on your phone and security policy. this

year says that military activity in rivalry has intensified in the region. your, your government has also highlighted the growing importance of the region in strategic competition. so in other words, the countries have their eyes on mineral resources, new shipping routes, especially as temperatures rise. the ice receipts, russia and china seemed to be teaming up more and more especially in this region. to what extent are you seeing this as a flash point, a site for intensifying well, for right now between the west, russia and china. yes, you know, the optic is becoming more and more important by the day. um, unfortunately with a, with the climate change which is extremely uh, well visible up and up in the north. um, so we appreciate it and well come with very, very much that. so then that nato is taking a very active approach in these matters as well, because the optic will play

a significant role, not only for trade routes, but also for military activity. unfortunately. and we do have seen that russia and china, i have increased their corporation over the course of the past years and especially months. we were very strongly cool on china to do everything in the power to have russia and the war in ukraine because effectively, china could achieve that if russia could not trained to so actively with china, especially in key components on technology, they couldn't, they couldn't be waging this war any longer, but what incentive does china have to do that? because, i mean, it's reported for example, and we're just, i'm just gonna bring it back to the arctic right now. that the time has been trying to promote the region as a global call, commons to sort of shifting governance in its favor. it's in describing itself as

mere architect um it wants to build the polar silk road. how much of a danger does china pose and is putting the face that you just put in it now to potentially help with the negotiations on ending the war and ukraine? so you know, what sort of hope is there for that as well? i know that's doing the china to um, facilitate any negotiations because they could just, you know, call putting on say, withdrawal your troops because, or just the into the intensified to trade with, with russia then in the will would end. because this is not the, not that like a balance situation where there was something really to negotiate about it is about having russia ended separation and go back to prospecting international law. but yeah, um i do think uh we, uh, as europe we do have significant offering for china. of course we do interact with

the china. we have a significant market over here and we have very much, well, a lot of business going on in china. but in the future, we of course, and even now we need to scrutinize this, this ever so carefully and more carefully because that's what china is allowing russia to do is directed against the basic principles of our security and our way of life. so of course we can't just do, you know, i see this happening and unfortunately, um, well, no longer we look into the future. i don't see any huge performance potential for, for rochester economy and therefore flash a future for that matter. but it will be very much china who will be deciding this just briefly before we go. feelings president has said that when we look at the current world order, the post cold,

cold world war era has died. the world is changing, but we do not exactly know where it is going yet. how do you see global power being being shared in the future as i still do think and hope that in the future, the main power lies with the people that to walk this year. we've seen a record number of election. so not all of them have been fair, but this happening 1st of the minutes away lights. so it's devastated. but at the same time, the power that lives with people who are able and for you to decide on their behalf, they will always if you give them the charge to decide they will try to live in a free democracy then somewhere else. and this is the power we should be relying on independent of what happens. finish for administer, elena felton, and thank you so much for joining us on conflicts on us. thank you so much. the

only under strict security protocol in 15 minutes on the w. i g major difference,

visionaries with a project get involved to create a future day experience. eco mdx. in 90 minutes, d w. a has to go to do you do this to change the channels? she survived. oh sure. it's thanks to music. she was the nazis favorite conductor. to positions under the swastika, a documentary about the sounds of power and inspiring story about survival. music in nazi germany, watch now on youtube dw documentary. october 7th,

2023 from us. loans has a terror attack as well. it is the bloody estate in the history of the 2 estates and the beginning of the roll and gone one year nice. week 7. the backgrounds of the attack. how could it happen? what role that is really and palestinian would sort of change the have most of the titles, the change tel aviv. what he hasn't had on israel policy capital focused on one year. israel homos scouts of tobin says on the w the,

this is the, the news line from berlin. israel launches new air strikes in bay roots lebanese authorities report multiple desks in the capital, as is really ground forces in southern lebanon. press ahead with their offensive against testable and after israel spouse to retaliate for ron's largest ever miss alice solves you as president joe biden says he would not support an attack on a runs nuclear program. types of in crass on roars a shore and tie one word to death. so i've already been blamed on the storms approach and so.