or maybe my voice will be heard back spring to our seeking justice for the victims of fame assigned this week on dw the w. here's why i from violating the international criminal cause issues arrest warrants, the leaders of israel. and from that, is there any prime minister, benjamin netanyahu, and former defense minister, you ask alons, are accused of war crimes, including directing attacks on civilian populations and using starvation as a weapon of also on the program. and you're talking of russian, miss iowa. hey, it's ukraine rising, the pressure on k of and its allies exhausted the ukraine spaces to test the decisions of the price is prepared to pay for paid as a by john tries to forward a new deal as the us climate conference you in the climate conference in fact, which is nearing its end,

that it gets struggled to agree on how to finance or future plague like global the . i'm from go broke into the program. you try to be prime minister benjamin netanyahu has reacted angrily as to the international criminal court issued a warrant for his arrest. the under the former defense administer your off guidelines are accused of bull crimes in gaza and crimes against humanity which mister nelson yahoo is labeled upset because also issued a warrant for the head of a masters the wing. but how many death over the attack on december, the 7th, last year, the israel claims that he was killed in an ass, dr. a debt on the artist list of the international criminal court is strongly prime minister benjamin netanyahu and former defense minister you off guard on both are

judge, be directed a ducks on civilian populations and using starvation as of they've been a for nathan. yeah. how describe the move as and disseminate dick the truth, a simple no more is more just then the war that israel has been waging and gaza after her mazda attacked us unprovoked launch the launching the worst massacre against the jewish people since the holocaust is trying to have it checked at the court surface fiction and did nice committing work games got so the united states has also expressed deep concerns over the court's decision. we fundamentally reject the court's decision to issue arrest warrants for senior israel officials. we remain deeply concerned by the prosecutors rush to seek arrest warrants and the troubling process. errors that lead to this decision. nighted is straight north. the us are members of the icy c. it is, however, back by $12462.00 states, including all nations belonging to the go to pin union 0 5th portez. but you stop

diplomatic reminded or 27 member countries of the duty to abide by the court ruling . this decision is a binding decision on all state. all the states bought a dish of the court which includes all members of the union on binding this lemon discard this is it strikes the domain by faith. he will not be the dog until it strikes what objective are met? what does it care? imagine reaction to this news has been mixed. here's a flavor of that response. that's the thing. chan, uh there is no other choice button to defy this decision. so today i will invite israel as a prime minister mister netanyahu for a visit to hungry. and in that same vibe, i will guarantee him that if he comes to the icy sees ruling,

will have no effect in hungry. and we will not fall out of it, come to your site and i'm just gonna go to a cycle and issuing them from you could let me think of that. we comply with national european, an international laws. so now we're examining exactly what this means for us in terms of national implementation. the secretary respects the work and the independence of the international criminal court. and i really do that for the news that the for listening people to do that the size and the efforts to, to, to reach, to justice and the accountability to the crimes committed. that gives them a, be a good and some incidents and advanced. yes. just this sometimes big, much longer than bullets, some bumps, but at the end of the day we have reached the 4th floor. the 3rd job interesting is the palestinian people deserve justice. legal institutions exist to hold people accountable and to meet the requirements of justice, and therefore this decision must be treated with respect either thought. well,

let's look at some of the implications of base rooting with janine adel, who's director of the oxford institute for ethics law and the conflict. welcome to the w. we just her. thank you. jerry and prime minister victor old bob guaranteed that the court ruling would have no effect. if benjamin netanyahu visits his country, which is a member of the court through members get to pick and choose which readings they accept. no, of course not all members of the room statues have immediate obligation to arrest permanent soneta, no form of defense minister kalonde, and the rest of the alarm at tafe should they be on the territory. so these individuals cannot no trouble to a 124 member states of their own statute without risking being arrested. the fact that i'm not all member states are willing to comply with this ruling is quite troubling. because when a competent international court finds reasonable grounds to suspect ahead of governmental flu crimes and crimes against humanity, we would expect the reaction to be to criticize and potentially practiced function,

that's suspect and not the court. we're right. and so the court has no enforcement . the powers itself of a suspect, but this looks like an additional weakness invest. it cannot sanction member states to take who don't follow its ruling. is i, my wife about it looks like it's a quote that i could come through that there will be other ways to involve the security council about the security council in this particular context here. political context is not likely to step up. so in some sense, um, it is not very likely that mentioned no go on to the end up in front of the hague. very soon, the 2 closest precedents we have to someone else that's elevated political importance as a head of government being sold by the i see our president clinton and president for all of us here against whom b i. c. c, previously issued arrest, friends. and both of them have also so far evaded the rest. so, so when african countries and critics on the global sides complain that the international criminal court is only ever used to punish them or leaders who are

not aligned with the west, do they have a point as well? it is that he told me that western governments have by and large not been consistent in upholding that one commitments to international law. and this particular to your political context. they are that by weakening the quote that will be kind of international. and then the next one to draw on the quote to these institutions, international institutions, they will find them weakened by their own actions. it's interesting, the united states is positioned on this welcoming, the, the issuing of a ruling against flooding that person. and then i put in this one against a is ready prime minister inside some troubling and glaring inconsistency. but i don't think we must this bad because these arrest ones half of the implications, then not just symbolic because in some sense we now have an international quotes. having told the world that an acting has us government to still very much direct

how the war and gaza unfolds, is kind of the accused of crimes against humanity and will crimes. that must in fact be an important data point for us that states to re evaluate whether they support is or and in this for because i'm some, some the comes up at the heart of this arrest war. and so the dep probation office civilian population in gaza and patents of attack suspected to be directed against civilians. this conduct very much persists for any state that now continues to support israel, and it's one casa basic. supposing crime crimes against humanity and will crimes, that must mean something in the long run politically. okay, good. talking to us a very interesting thank you so much for joining us. that outlining that so clearly do you need to do something else with institution ethics, little and, and conflict. so i to ukraine and to rush, just as it used a new mid range, ballistic missile to strike the eastern ukrainian city. often the pro, the us believes the experimental bathrooms, a car,

is equipped to carry conventional nuclear weapons and what's being seen as a major escalation. russian president vladimir putin says the strike was a response to ukrainian attacks on russian soto using of western supplied weapons. security footage show strikes raining down across the city of denise pro. russia says that he used a new weapon and the attack, calling it an arrest. nick ballistic missile damage from the strike was limited, but russia's claimed weapon of choice appears to send a clear statement. a mid range ballistic miss style is capable of carrying nuclear warheads and typically has a reach of between 300-5500 kilometers. while it to you to be consumed, if that was what was fired, the tech came off, the ukraine was given permission to launch themselves supplied by the u. k. and us

into russia. president vladimir foods and says most go could strike military installations of any country. please, within a used against russia they use but then you, we do a listing missile system. so being tested in combat competition, that's in response to be aggressive actions. it's nice to a countries against russia. the question of the deployment or medium range and showed arrangements of will be decided depending on the actions of the us adults. allies the top you're going to be here for the dream days for the tests, about lightest missile systems will be determined on the basis of the traits up to rushes and security. who grew up with the process that he's getting into. russia issued a new junction this week to allow for a potential nuclear response to an attack on russia by any nation that is supported by a nuclear power. ukraine's president below them is the landscape. since those days strike was assigned,

that pollution has no interest in peace. it is not supposed to be an easy sheet now . crazy nay. the once again showed what he really is and how he despises dignity, freedom and human life in general. and how afraid he or she can, i guess, just yourself right? that he uses new me so i will send you searches the world for other places to find weapons in iran, in north career of the nation, including zalinski, cold for strong willed wide condemnation of the attack, which marks the clear escalation and the nearly 3 year war he says, a lack of reaction would seem to message that russia's behavior is acceptable when credit is also facing difficult questions off the battlefield. as donald trump's return to the white house re ignited, city bates over potential negotiated peace, ukraine's future security is a key sticking point. moscow says it's open, sustains 5 discussions, but it also says, can, you must have binding plans to join nato. but ukraine has rejected ending the conflict on times that would leave it vulnerable to

a future russian invasion. the brain is under growing pressure militarily and politically to discuss a possible end to the war with russia. donald trump selection has put future us support for cube and question. germany's chancellors talking to vladimir putin again, under russian forces, are making slow but steady battlefield gains. ukrainian president, florida, muse zalinski says any peace still, we'll have to consider ukraine's long term security with the auction with that goal . as obviously the she's going to protect against the russian aggression. now she went to doing everything not to lose the postwar piece piece, to preserve and strengthen our nation fee is both the state and the people in the shop. this is mandatory, philip will be a school. when's the landscape pitched his victory planned to end the war to his closest partners in october, he urged them to issue an immediate invitation to join nato. a formal invitation

has long been known valencia's wish list was in the trans atlantic alliance. is, has been greeted with resistance for many members, and that means ukraine needs other options to assure its security. if it reaches a peace deal with russia, you probably will not be going to make to that has to be have some form of guarantee. so the credit is on to start that the rest and simply won't start this over the next year. and that, that certain elements of the west, particularly us u. k. front will be ready to start dating. should that take place not least by logical security counties, and i think there's a much, much, much more likely than any kind of natural right to ukraine has already entered into biological security agreements with 27 of its allies. they pledge long term support for ukrainian self defense, by providing assistance to boost ukraine's military capabilities on shore a p, crane's economy and governance. but they do not contain any commitments to come to

ukraine's defense with the deployment of armed forces in response to future russian aggression. well that's bringing you 5 expert. the next year, agrees co caesar financing, follow the your pin council on foreign relations and joins us from key. welcome to data you. so regardless of the will words from nato chief my role to the install to invent before him, is there any well in which nato's $32.00 members states would agree to allow ukraine to join in the face of a messy p steel? and the suspicion that vladimir putin isn't done with caveat. oh, well, 1st and foremost, i think uh, the short answer is there is really no other security guarantee for ukraine, other than joining needle. and there is a reason that's in the recently presented victory planned by the brands president

zalinski. major membership was indeed a amongst the priorities it was listed. in fact, from all the 5 points is number one, trying to reinvent some sort of other. so security guarantee is basically self deception, the only a plausible and potential other guarantee would be a nuclear one. however, i have to remind everybody that ukraine was unfortunately forced in 1994 to give up in the world's 3rd largest nuclear arsenal. in exchange of nothing, in exchange of nothing as we've seen back in 2014 and now and 2022 up until now. uh so what indeed needs to be done in the 1st place by chris western allies is to grant an invitation. now is recent history shows us from, from the cases of sweden and finland even an invitation. it does not mean an immediate accession to the lions. and this leaves us with

a sort of limbo in the interim which can be finished. i think the other instantly interrupt you that because we still have gotten that from the the, the ukraine side. let's deal with reality. ukraine says 816 invitation. nature says you will be welcome in due course. there is no way the invitation is going to be issued. so let's, let's, let's talk about why russia is sort of facing that a breathing down ukraine's neck. so does that, where does that leave keys as well? i, i would definitely not say that this is definitely not going to help, i think, but under, in the back end when it's ration that is still a possible. now in the meantime while ukraine is indeed weight, and as you clearly mentioned, there are other security. i would say arrangements not,

not guarantees. one is for example, um the whole concept of protection by presence. and this means placement of military conditions of the so called coalition of the willing. right, let's say at the get through the borderline. you could also place military instructors, conduct military exercises in trainings on the territory of ukraine, all sorts of maritime vessel operations, something but the united kingdom, by the way, was doing pre invasion back in 2021. okay. some of the other options, like, like the like back to the bilateral arrangements where nato members might decides to put that bad troops that assets in other around ukraine. it's easy to see how you cry and would benefit from nato membership. but what's the ukranian page to nato? how would this? we can quote, a fire insurance club benefit from admitting a man by whose house looks like it might go up in flames at any moment. or? well, i would say you,

chris invitation to nato is precisely about ending this war as soon as possible and preventing from a new one from happening. because if we're talking about this whole notion of uh, you know, negotiations and putting a ukraine under pressure to sit at the negotiation table. we're definitely looking not looking into the perspective of a sustainable piece. the only real guarantee for both ukraine and the trans atlantic security space would be for ukraine to join nato, because ukraine's membership and data is sort of this the fastest and the strongest signal to russian out. and leads into the russian society that ukraine will never be part of the russian empire. nato is a bug bite by this way, a, a, a territorial, a jury political marker that this territory will not, not be part of the empire. and of all of the other alliance as the rushes trying to create on the territory of the posts of the both of you countries on this. and so

the continued station of any other special operation, it seemed simply loses any meaning. thank you for i tell you here so that so clearly, unless it agrees go from being your thing council on foreign relations you to as the un climate conference in baku where host as a by john is to propose a new deal on climate financing after another draft was rejected. developing nations, according for $1.00 trillion dollars, money that would help because most valuable countries, too painful damages from climate climate damage and developed strategies to adapt to a warming planet. the 2 week climate towards a due to end today was those down a good struggle to agree on the future of climate funding. many of questions the, both the united states will play into a 2nd, trump presidency. so here's a look at what i 2nd trump time could mean for the fight against climate change.

first, we're going to drill baby drill. it's no secret trumps america. first agenda puts economy over environment after a particularly strong hurricane season that was intensified by climate change. many worry about a 2nd, trump term troll and is supporters have a different view? clearly on climate policy view that oil and gas is really central to america's global strengths. and that shouldn't be a toyed with a 2nd to us exit from the paris agreement and possibly the and climate framework for risk us commitments to global climate finance. crucial for developing nations transitioning to clean energy terms, influence may already be spread and globally argentina's, how the emulate a self proclaimed trunk fab. withdrew negotiators from the ongoing comp 29 climate

talks. this, a trump has controversial plans to expand fossil fuel drilling even in areas like alaska's arctic national wildlife refuge, which threatens entire eco systems. one analysis warrant that trumps future policies could add 4000000000 tons of emissions by 2030. that's as much as they use in japan's annual emissions. combined. some fear the new administration will also banding biden's inflation reduction act, which pump hundreds of billions of dollars into a clean energy transition. but experts say pulling out of the i r a will not be that simple. there are sections of the place to relax tonight, which has been really wildly successful. been driving clean energy manufacturing uh and jobs uh across the country, but particularly to so called red states, which are receiving about 70 percent of the investments from the inflation

reduction. that's with federal climate leadership in question. state governors are doubling down on local climate commitments. washington state governor j and slate level delegation from the us climate alliance to cop $29.00 to stress the urgency of regional leadership on climate change and state for california, which if a country would have the 5th biggest economy on the planet, already positioning themselves to sustain renewable efforts, regardless of federal policy, changes with renewable energy costs falling and state commitments growing clean energy momentum may still persist in the us even under trumps administration. a more likely effects of trump in just a moment where that data is chief climate change of report. louise osborne welcomed louise, but i had just that the speed of development at comp, that's right. there has been a new text but has just come out for us as

a proposal on what a deal could actually look like if they have come up with a figure now for climate financing, which will be the money to help developing countries to deal with the impacts of climate change and developed in a way that is not focusing on fossil fuels. currently be pledges for that or a 100000000000. that was up until 2020. that really goes chasing that 2nd now. and this new text has proposed a figure of 250000000000, which is a lot lower than i know, developing countries well hoping to get. they were looking for a ticket that was closer to attorney. and so this is a new offer. it hasn't been signed off yet. no, no. okay. so this is, this is the next step in the negotiated thanks. all right, so we've been talking about the, the rest, the likely shape of us policy with the election of, of donald trump. we, so he's plans to move the usaa out of the power. so i agree with the last time i'm

how, how much influence of us negotiates has had a b, c is conference. i mean, obviously the negotiate is going into the conference this time of from the biden administration. but they have been under a huge amount of pressure because they know, obviously that from january it will be a precedent. i like to trump taking those at that office and that is likely that the us will then be pulled out of the power as agreement. and that means that you know, they've had, well, they've been trying to constructively engage themselves in negotiations. experts have said that they obviously are unable to make any real promises when it comes to this financing, because they don't know what is going to happen. post a trump being integrated that is likely to have had that effect on the kind of figure that we're seeing coming out as a proposal for climate finance. okay. i know i'm on positive biden's and inflation reduction, which has led to big investments in when you will energy, ironically,

in lots of states, but voted for donald trump. is this happened? and this the i, i wish we failed. what sort of impact would that have globally? i mean, it's unlikely that it will be completely repealed because they're all parts of it that have been very beneficial in republican states, investment into renewable energy that is provided shops there, etc. but the problem is, is that the us is the 2nd biggest, mr. if it pulls out of the past agreement, it won't be on the obligation to reduce its emissions. and trump has already stated many times his intentions to invest in oil and gas, which means his focus is not going to be on renewables. that doesn't stop the train as it's going at the moment um, already because obviously there is a lot of investment that has been put into renewables, but it's likely to slow down, you know, the us reduction of,

of carbon emissions at least. okay. and i'm as far as active participation then in global global climate diplomacy is the is the us a lame duck? at the moment? it's a lame duck with regards to peace negotiations. but it has always been the case that there has been states and cities within the us that say that they want to keep committing to copper reduction goals, despite what the federal government does. and they will look at, you know, investing and making sure that they are looking at renewables, which, you know, is really important to make us competitive against countries like china and europe, etc. it's so those commitments will stay in place with, with the states. anyway, thank you. for that to at least the district permits report at least eligible and i set you up to date of next on dw, to the points,

talks about an academic violence against women. i'll be back up until the,

the, the, to the point. strong opinions, clear position, international perspective. according to the you in every 10 minutes to women is cute. no country or community is unaffected. on to the point we are discussing, widens again. is it an epidemic? no one cares about. to the point. next, on d, w. rodolfo has a dream once the children in a tiny, not in village in venezuela to be able to read right and do arithmetic. but how can

you make a history and come true when he's working all by himself and with no support from the state, the school in the in 45 minutes on d, w. the if you like, history and thought with the side of the culture, travel and control to see this one. right. so see what the nice thing about us that well for the wow, that's up back into your everyday life. every day we encounter so many things that we don't even notice that it just kind of fade into the background, but it is still showing a spotlight on them. what you say might just surprise. we're gonna dig up the, the on the everyday things around. when did they come from? when, why did they have all the time?

we can just search for the day and treat them elsewhere. are the lessons if i've got the violence against women and goes remain one of the most prevalent on phobia. so human rights violations in the world, according to the un, a woman is killed every 10 minutes. the silent epidemic is only getting worse. so what drives us violence if it be only the actions of individual men or does the problem light and deep also size and structure that systematically undervalue women . are man alone to blame the or do factors like flawed, of bringing on bridge agenda role as contribution on why is one is against women more prevalent in certain regions as compared to others to day on to the point we are discussing, while ins against women is.