services be our guest at frankfurt and bought cd managed by from bought the business. the news life from the delegates, the us climate change conference rates, to finalize the deals as a summit chose to a close. but negotiators in fact, who struggle to find common ground between rich and poor nations, with fear, disagreement over how much to pay to fix the problems caused by global war. and wealth reacts after the international criminal court issues arrest warrants for the ages of israel and how much global leaders assess how to respond as he's ready to find minister benjamin netanyahu is a form of defense administer your off guidelines are accused of bullcrap the

i'm feel welcome to the program and we begin with breaking news from the un climate conference and as a body shop. a new draft deal on climate finance is now on the table. multi countries would pay $250000000000.00 a year by 2035 to help developing nations combat the effects of global warming. now the proposal also sensible, i'm vicious target to raise $1.00 trillion dollars a year from wells in nations and private sector investments by 2075. governments are under pressure to reach a deal today. the last day of the summits, folks could go into overtime if no agreement is reached. dw report that they've shown book is the talks in back who welcome attempts there's, there's 250000000000 dollar proposal main. this somebody can actually land the deal

in time of the well, it doesn't really look like, i mean, maybe they can. but so from what we have been observing here in the past days, this offer to developing countries is really nothing close to what they have been asking for over the past months. and especially in the past days and in back who it is certainly nothing they can and they will agree to yesterday we have been talking to, we've been hearing a chaz of the g $77.00 plus china, the group which is a powerful negotiation group of developing countries, they have the answers to the question, how would you react to a big around 200000000000? the onset? is this a joke? so this proposal let's see on the table at the moment of $200000000000.00 per year would not significantly significantly increase the amount of money that is that is

coming through developing countries to protect against the climate change and at the reactions here are very heavy from civil society as we have a at the moment. and we haven't talked to a developing country so far, but i also do expect very heavy rejection of what's on the table at the moment. okay, so what else stands out in this proposal? while you have mentioned that the figure of $1.00 trillion dollars is in the what the developing countries have been asking a industrialized countries who are the main contributor to climate change to pay them. but what this, how this figure should be filled is very unclear. all sources of, of money. i mentioned that uh, yeah, all thoughts as i mentioned, which could also mean loans to market rates, which could also mean private capital. nobody really knows where this money should

come from. so that's the black hole. on the other hand, we see a very interesting point, and that's at china, which is invited to contribute to this 250000000000 figure, which is a big signal that they're contributions they've been doing out of the pirates agreements. so far they've been announcing to $24500000000.00 payments to the global south. and that this could be counted in the and this is a big step towards china and china's contribution to climate finance, which could be significant and going forward. okay, thank you for that. tim date of the climate reports tim showing book a back now he's ready, prime minister benjamin netanyahu has reactor downgrade to the international criminal court, issuing a warrant for his arrest. the and former defense minister, you'll have to go on to the accused of war crimes and gaza on crimes against humanity, which mister netanyahu is labeled upset. the truth is simple. no more is more just

then the war that israel has been waging and gaza after her mazda attacked his unprovoked launch, the launch, and the worst massacre. it goes to the jewish people since the holocaust, as well as you can imagine, a response to this news amongst the international leaders has been mixed up. here's a, here's a flavor starting with home gabby and prime minister to all about this country is a member of the colt. that's the thing. chan, uh there is no other choice but to defy this decision. so today i will invite israel as a prime minister. mister netanyahu for a visit to hungry, and in that same vibe, i will guarantee him, if he comes to the icy seas ruling will have no effect in hungry. and we will not fall out of it. come to your site and i'm just going to a cycle and issuing them from you could let me think is that we comply with national european an international laws. so now we're examining exactly what this means for us in terms of national implementation. we fundamentally reject the

court's decision to issue a risk lawrence for senior israel officials. we remain deeply concerned by the prosecutors rushed to seek arrest warrants and the troubling process errors that led to this decision. the united states has been clear that the i, c. c does not have jurisdiction over this matter. you've heard a say this before. the secretary respects the work and the dependence of the international criminal court. and i really do that for the news. the people to the that the size and the efforts to, to, to reach to justice and the accountability to the crime is committed. that gives them, i'll be getting cemented and advanced. yes, just this sometimes take much longer than bullet some bumps. but at the end of the day, we have reached the point of flawed its own chapman to see me is the palestinian people deserve justice. legal institutions exist to hold people accountable and to

meet the requirements of justice. and therefore, this decision must be treated with respect either and i told responded rosie, but child who is in the hague, sent this updates on the international reaction. i knew the rest words issued by this court in the hague, are certainly sparking international control overseas, specially those issued against israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu, and former defense chief you'll go on. we've seen them swiftly condemned by the united states and by israel, who says they make international justice into a laughing stock. neither of those countries to us the read through our state parties to the i c. c. but 124 countries around the world are, and all of them legally are obliged to arrest anyone who's on the i. c. c. internationally wanted list enters their territory. and that's why this is taking up a whole load of different logic dilemmas like hed, especially for european union countries. since the u, as in the past held itself as one of the top supporters of the i, c. c. you've talked to people not use that brill has been reminding member states

that this is an independent court with legally binding decisions fall. on the other hand, we seen officer, you're saying that they move to an issue, arrest warrants against these really prime minister damages the court's credibility and hungry is gotten so far as to say, it would defy the arrest board and invites the it's really probably minister to visit hungry. now, important to note that the internationally wanted labeled hasn't always in the past turned people into global pariahs. russian president vladimir putin, for example, is also officially a suspected war criminal. but we've seen some international leaders still happy to shake his hands on my goal. you did not arrest flooding your present when he came to visit the country earlier this year, despite the fact that it was legally obliged to do so on paper and not really shows the key limits of international law. there is no international police force that could sweep in under rest suspected war criminals. so that's why there's such a difference between arrest words being issued and ever seeing anyone on the course internationally wanted list here in the dock in the hague. it's rosie,

but you all have to give them to her and get it in 5 minutes. as response, i asked janine a deal of food from the oaks at the institute for ethics, little, and conflict. if signatures to the international court get to pick and choose which rules accept no calls about all members of the rooms that you have a need to obligation to arrest reminiscent and you all form of defense minister kalonde. and the rest of the moment, dave, should they be on the territory. so these individuals cannot no trouble to a $124.00 member states of the room statute without risking being arrested. the fight, but not all men. the states are willing to comply with this ruling is quite troubling because many competent international court finds reasonable grounds to suspect the heads of governmental full crimes and crimes against humanity. we would expect the reaction to be to criticize the potentially attractive function that i'm suspect and not the court. we're right, i'm so the court has no enforcement the powers itself of a suspect. but this looks like an additional weakness invest. it cannot sanction

member states to tech who don't follow its ruling is, am i right about that? that's why it's a quote directly come through that there will be other ways to and off the security council about the security council in this particular context. your point is that the context is not likely to step up. so in some sense, um, it is not very likely that mentioned no go on to the end up in front of the hate. very soon, the 2 closest precedents we have to someone else that's elevated political importance as a head of government being sold by the i see our president clinton and president will not all of us here against whom the i c. c. previously issue the restaurants and both of them have also so far evaded the rest. so so what african countries and critics and the global science complain, but the international criminal court is only ever used to punish them or leaders who i'm not aligned with the west. do they have a point as well? it is that he told me that wisdom governments have by and large not been consistent in upholding their own commitments,

to international law. and this particular to your political context. they are that by weakening the court, they will be kind of international. and when they next one to draw on the court or these institution international institutions, they will find them. we can buy their own actions. it's interesting, the united states is positioned on this welcoming uh, the, the issuing of a ruling against flooding that person. and then i put this one against a is ready prime minister inside some troubling and glaring inconsistency. but i don't think we must this bad because these arrest ones half of the implications, then not just symbolic because in some sense we now have an international quotes having told the world that an accident has us government to still very much direct how the war and gaza unfolds, is credibly accused of crimes against humanity and will crimes that must, in fact, be an important data point for us that states to re evaluate whether they support is are and in this war. because in some sense,

the contact at the heart of these arrest war and so the deprivation of the civilian population in gaza and patents of the text suspected to be directed against civilians. this conduct very much persists for any state that now continues to support israel, and it's one casa basic, supposing crime crimes against humanity and will crimes. that must mean something in the long run politically. okay, good. talking to us of very interesting. thank you so much for joining us, that outlining that so clearly do you need to do from the ultimate in century for ethics, little conflict, and nathan members. it holds an emergency meeting with ukraine next week, after rush or attack, the city of the new pro with a new type of mid range missed file. the strike was initially thought to be an intercontinental ballistic mist file, but the us not believe it wasn't experimental life. and equipped academy conventional and nuclear warheads. a security footage show strikes raining down across the city of the neat pro. russia says it used a new weapon and the attack,

calling it an arrest. nick ballistic missile. damage from the strike was limited, but russia's claimed weapon of choice. if he is to send a clear statement, a mid range ballistic miss style is capable of carrying nuclear warheads and typically has a reach of between 300-5500 kilometers. while it to you to be consumed, if that was what was fired, the tech came off, the ukraine was given permission to launch themselves supplied by the u. k. and u. s. into russia. president vladimir putin says most go could strike military installations of any country who's with in a used against russia is put then you, we are listing missile system to being tested and come back from dish and it's in response to be aggressive action to make a country against russia, the question of the deployment, the medium range and showed arrangements of will be decided depending on the

actions of the us added. tell us the top is going to be here for the dream days for the test. so that lightest missile systems will be determined on the basis of the traits up to rushes and secure. you who grew up with the questions that i see. so if you get a russia issued a new junction this week to allow for a potential nuclear response to an attack on russia by any nation that is supported by a nuclear power. ukraine's president below them is the landscape says those days strike was assigned that pollution has no interest in peace as it was not supposed to be an easy sheet. how crazy night the once again showed what he really is and how he despises dignity, freedom and human life in general. and how afraid he or she can, i guess just to yourself, right? that he uses new me sorry. sadie searches the world for other places to find weapons in iran, in north korea to speak nation including zalinski,

cold for strong willed wide condemnation of the attack, which marks a clear escalation and the nearly 3 year war he says and set you up to date of the day the the innovation green, the green revolution global. so listen to a whole lot of crime. it's probably up to speed if the carriers that subscribe to those channels every friday subscribe to plan, it's a.