and what it means for ukraine and ultimately for the russian reich, this meeting was very important to take care of the fact that a coalition of 40 nato countries has actually been established and is noticeably wider than the ato in support of ukraine, and it is not just a coalition for the sake of words. coalition for the sake of action for the sake of support for the sake of support primarily with weapons because now ukraine has entered the second stage of the big war for a long time with more modern and more powerful offensive weapons with long-range artillery not only with weapons of the soviet model and even more modern nato weapons, and this meeting at rammstein was precisely

of great importance in that there is a consensus of the entire civilized world that the country is capable of operating that this war will last a long time and ukraine needs to support weapons and it is very important the conclusion of the final meeting in rammstein is that such summits at the level of defense ministers and other leaders of this coalition should be permanent , they will take place online, and this means that aid to ukraine will be provided operationally, and i just noticed for myself that there are countries like brazil, for example , yes, yes, yes, yes. well, i am not talking about israel, turkey. that is, it is the same as the civilized world. if you can say that, it is not

only about war and about well, as it were, about values ​​and the same yes that is, are you on the side of good or evil and but i want to ask a more specific question already about this wrong meeting rammstein and about the fact that something strange is happening in the so-called transnistria a lot a statement from the side of this well in fact, the occupation authorities of russia, eh, here is the last statement belongs to oleksiy arrestovych . the recent escalation of transnistria and russian provocations says that the situation in moldova may be complicated, aristovych says, and it is better. what can be done in this case ? ask for help from ukraine and romania, this is a general idea, they want a new application, in principle, in

principle, it's completely natural, because romania is, well, what's in front of well, in fact, it's the transnistrian region of the republic of moldova, which is occupied by russian troops declared a taxed republic, their armed forces exist with the contingent that is supposedly russian, they are not capable of causing damage to ukraine on this flank of defense. but russia is artificially heating up this hotbed to extend the ukrainian front and create some kind of the basis for mobilization, for the possible diversion of attention, the diversion of some ukrainian units in that direction in order to weaken other directions, for example, in the kherson mykolaiv oblast, in the odesa oblast, i'll just draw a parallel to this... the events in transnistria as something like that. well, it's very artificial

. of course, this is a staging - it's a provocation, but let's remember that the big russian invasion began when there were american warnings and intelligence data about what was going to happen. a foreign flag there, a fairy fake attack, when there will be provocations on the territory of ugar-2, when there will be inspired terrorist attacks, when there will be shelling that will be passed off as shelling from the ukrainian side, and this will be the basis for the invasion of russian troops , when they started a week before the 24th or after for a couple of weeks until february 24, they looked at them with round eyes that they were shooting themselves or blowing themselves up in donetsk and in donetsk, but in the end it is interesting for them, for this invasion, then the second example of belarus, let's remember uh, how uh

russian planes under the guise of ukrainian planes began to hit their villages in the press of the region, and this was a reason for them to drag the belarusian army to the invasion of ukraine and strengthen the occupying russian forces at that difficult moment of the first phase of the war when they needed reinforcements for the attack on kyiv, then the belarusians were not in a position. they remained in their positions , they did not invade ukraine, and with all this negativity that existed in us before lukashenka, it played into our hands very much because, well, in uh, that's possible what is happening in transnistria now means more loss and more expense for us from this resource and equipment and time. it seems to me that this is not the time to calmly wait out this provocation, because transnistria is much more

preserved and isolated than the dnr the so-called lpr, which has access to russia by land, decided at an angle between them. that is, in general, personally compressions from there and that the russian troops of transnistria are preserved, it is isolated, and we have to treat it quite calmly, because eh, well, the harm it will cause us by itself is very insignificant. and when it will move into a wider theater of hostilities, when we had to, we will also have to fight something in transnistria. and we already have a rather difficult parity on that wide front from kherson region to kharkiv oblast, it will not be in the hands of the ukrainian troops now. we are with transnistria, the young transnistria will figure it out, but a little later, when ukraine's advantage in this main theater will be more visible, the favorites. and now i am convinced that there is no need to touch him. have

right, that is, i just want to note that in russia, well, at least at this stage, ghosts are unnecessary for the war, they are, well, what they want, they do such things. in addition, this general, i am the commander, seems to be the central district of the russian military district, he directly said that our goal - this is an association with transnistria, and they also say, you know, dmytro, that there are a lot of weapons, well, there are still some left, but you are sure that despite all the provocations, there is not a single help to the occupiers - this group is unable to do it can be some there are minimal attempts to be there because it is very comparatively not a contingent of the level of one er poorly combat-capable ukrainian mechanized brigade

. only russia and the rest of moldova and ukraine as well, and maybe romania, by the way, maybe also romania, and romania. also, we see these columns that have already been sought out from transnistria to flee to moldova and partially even to ukraine, they don't want to fight, of course i agree. what is this also minyakaev from the central military district, the deputy commander, he voiced the real plans of russia in the second phase of the war, they were not. not even this mole, russia does not want to limit itself to any donbas , they want to advance further and break through the land corridor further, we will open further to transnistria, this was even known muzhenko also showed all these

maps and these threats existed only in 14 of the 15th years, this is not a secret for anyone, but just in order for a real combat-capable russian group that can enter from crimea that can enter from the territory of op-2 through the kherson region to odesa , but in order to repulse it, we must not move into transnistria for the time being, because transnistria in itself does not constitute a military force, and if suddenly something happens there and they creep towards ukraine, they will be repelled it is very easy and it will be complete for this we will have legitimacy well of course the war continues and so on but if there is no such point of view it is a slightly different situation than a military one and why then the russian provocations and that is exactly why the first thing well them we need to

dispersed our defense efforts so that nothing might happen there, but we will keep most of our defense forces in that direction. well, in addition to that, they can try, just like in belarus, they can try to try to attract a wider force of the transnistrians hours ago that in the russians, resources and reserves, also in the evening, they already won the entire northern fleet that could come here , they will win the pacific fleet there, kamchatka and sakhalin, they won abkhazia, their contingents and south ossetia, now they have moved to transnistria they are trying to pull something out , in fact, it is unlikely that they will succeed, but the provoked campaign of these explosions is going on, it is very clumsy, very artificial

. that is, their transnistrians are even worse soldiers against ukraine than the belarusians and even worse than the residents of the occupied territories or the donetsk and luhansk regions. there they have jazz musicians and journalists, they get captured or just immediately become some kind of expendable material. well, they can determine there a map of minefields that can be blown up. there are some living flaps of belarusians, and you didn’t even dare to lead, well, the transnistrians are even worse soldiers. but russia wants to do everything to when will you increase the voice of your support at the expense of all the russians there, there are libyans, it’s someone else’s turn, that is, the transnistrians. well, ukraine is not interested in starting hostilities in

the direction where they are not, because, well, plodova for example, she is also in no hurry to provide military aid there in ukraine, although it is clear that she is our ally because they are a little wary there. and where are schalke the scales leaning, but if the pajamas appear in our direction, the young man will win for the time being, what is she waiting for? will happen in transnistria, well, we are also waiting to see what will happen. in other e-e directions, so that we can pay attention to the company later. a military pilot, the head of the all-ukrainian aviation association and ivan stupak - a military expert, i will read the operative information from kherson . today, people went to a rally against the pseudo-referendum that the occupiers wanted to hold, and there are already reports that the same occupiers

used light-noise grenades against ukrainians against the people of kherson who came to the rally for ukraine well , there are apparently several detainees there, we will monitor the information and tell me, please, whether there are already guests with us, gennady khazan, a military pilot should join, this is a very interesting topic. i would like to talk with gennady about aviation because it is announced. good day everyone. i want to start with a question to gennady, how is he a pilot of a military pilot, gennadiyovych? please tell me here a speech today seems to be expected in the british parliament by the minister of defense of the united

kingdom, and as they announce, they will propose there how to call on the allies, well, that is, these states that we saw in rammstein still start supplying ukraine with combat aircraft, what are you waiting for and in which what scale can it be and what are the needs of our aviation? well, everything is around the sky around our military pilot, what i want to tell you is that there are not many aviation, there are not many planes, but i want to warn all of us against certain mistakes. will appear and go forward, well , in order to go forward, it takes a certain amount of time for the pilots to master a certain type of aircraft , and the technical staff, and the technical staff, to have the opportunity to service it. and the most important thing is its tactical

use, because flying flights on an airplane is one thing, but using it in military affairs is a completely different matter, tactics, strategy, ammunition, etc. we must all understand together that the acquisition of foreign-made airplanes, yes, i will say it this way, it means that all the ammunition that will be used on them will also there should be standards , for example, nato, yes, the former state of ammunition, so let's say, the soviets of the soviet union used it there, for the most part, there will be no opportunity here, there are two sides, there is good, there is bad. it is necessary to use it, and ukraine will thereby switch to nato standards, because they will

use weapons on e-e that will be produced in nato countries, and it’s just hmm e-e will do everything so that we quickly switch to nato standards, and no one will do anything to us i didn't say, but when you switch to the standards, there will be certain planes. there will be weapons, there will be certain procedures, and they must be uh, and then we will work, but once again i want to emphasize to everyone that we should all drink cold water together, the planes will come tomorrow, this does not mean that the day after tomorrow they will fly and do business. therefore, in my personal opinion, the first thing should be done and it is already being done. this is help to ukraine in means of anti-aircraft defense of the great e-e so that they intercept e-e aircraft at

long distances so that there are no missile launches on ukraine, for example, is closer than 300 km so that they are afraid to fly on those aircraft of military purpose. mean that the sky of ukraine will be covered or closed or covered, well, it cannot be 100% always covered, but it can be covered, but it can be covered sufficiently so that they are afraid to approach the airspace of ukraine, i'm sorry, it's closer than there, for example, 200-300 km, listen, i want to clarify just very quickly about aviation, on the other hand, airplanes are what can be shipped to ukraine the fastest there with any nato country and the same why do you think

that it is about nato airplanes there are also remnants of the soviet union and on which they fight there russia now and there, poland, some other countries and these planes are familiar to our pilot. yes, you said about the performance of the british. well, she can call others. it's not just about britain, is it about america? that is, you said about britain. immediately turned on about britain, if it is about weapons that were produced on the territory of the former soviet union, that is, the former soviet union, then there are no questions, then everything is clear, but for example, some aircraft, for example, mig-29, which were on poland's armaments have been thoroughly modernized to nato standards, and there will also be questions that this is all. yes, it's just a

little bit wrong, and it will be necessary to adapt to them, but this is a lesser evil. well, it's not an evil as i say so. it's not evil, it's less of a problem, but if there is actually a conversation now about the armament of the former soviet union, we have experience in use, operation, repair , maintenance, then there are no questions. ugh, ivan stupak is also with us, a military expert, e p ivan yesterday on at this meeting, rammstein, in particular, talked about the fact that ukraine is entering a new phase of the war and we need to help it here . that as gennadiy said , our partners will be able to partially or completely cover or close the sky for us. let's put it this way. this is a rammstein meeting. it can be

compared to tehran during the second world war. that is, we have civilized developed countries that have made a unanimous decision to help ukraine in the fight against the aggressor. that is, this decision has already been made before, but it was necessary to confirm it with a meeting and now the aid will go. well, it will be even more large-scale, even more, er, more, it will be so coordinated in terms of place, time and size. optimistic, but very cautiously, but i say optimistically, cautiously, that ukraine has already won a victory at the strategic level. yes, we still have a tactical level, well, this is more or less, there is more, it is grounded on the ground, there are problems, there is a war, but we have already won a strategic victory, so there will be battles there for separate settlements there for more or less, but the victory is already there, that is, the equipment

is coming, the aviation is coming, my colleagues said, as they also said, the plane did not come completely, but the parts of the plane came , they were there yesterday poland, and today poland them there are no poles developing with their hands. well, we know they disappeared somewhere. it is not known where they went. that is, it is very good. why did he fly there without a wheel from a plane, that is, everything is frank, this is war, this is the logic of war. i would like to hear from you, olena, about ground weapons, for example, i contacted my swedish friend and i just want to report, i asked him about this well, now i will read i'm writing to him, dear. hello, what kind of thing is it? it's normal and the news is there. i sent it to sweden and it will be transferred to my party sava fh-77

bww.org это howitzer howitzer is the coolest in the world, this information was ukraine online and my friend who understands military topics writes very cool state-of-the-art that's how i'll insert the glories of sweden a long time ago and thank you here's the level the level of weapons no not planes i mean and on the ground-based ground-based land-based weapons which in your opinion look look why what's the trick a-a standard russian equipment weapons there well post-soviet a where are you soviet it was aimed at what the amount of ammunition was released on a certain territory of a plot of land in order to destroy the area of ​​the enemy there, that is, 30,000 ammunition there 20,000 and then move on, the europeans go the other way they technology is adopted, that is, less

ammunition, but more precisely, these howitzers are there, other artillery weapons have the ability to fire projectiles at a very long distance and 50-60 km, but with a range of plus or minus 4 m, that is, one projectile, one hit does not have one unit of equipment i.e. there is no need there sorry to shove 10-20 shells or percent there in order to destroy one i unit of equipment there i.e. there will be a point destruction of the russian fe from the second the goal is to preserve well as much as possible our infrastructure, i.e. got to move the entire quarter or part of the city in order for you to knock out and launch the enemy there 2.3 there are kulinivsky lines of these high-precision weapons and the point enemy is destroyed, the bmp tanks there or the infantry are very bitten, if you allow me, i will add two words, there is one more the thing is that you well, we all

understood again why this is the 21st century, these howitzers are about counter-battery warfare, these howitzers allow you to fire such a large number of shells in a minimal period of time, there is a moving barrel that they they fire at various angles, so that the projectiles arrive at the place of damage at the same time, this allows counter battery combat instantly, that is, 5-6 shots are fired and the howitzer begins to move, while the trajectory of the flight back and behind is calculated. after two minutes, a counter battery shot can be fired to destroy this installation, and it is no longer there, this is the first quite significant difference from the russian equipment that is currently standing and the second thing. see if

our savochka shoots there, and the same savushka buys back plus or minus, it is clear the distance at which they work, and when equipment appears that can hit 5-6 km further, it means that it will not fly to it from that side because they do not have such weapons. which weapon shoots at a greater distance than the enemy has, this will lead to the fact that the fedirasts will simply be exterminated , that is, as i understand from your words, ivan and gennady, that this howitzer is such an old word on the one hand, and on the other - it is such and such a howitzer which do their job like a surgical scalpel and er and the second one is the biggest problem. well, er, for our troops at the moment, this is precisely the massed and extensive er

artillery shelling, and with the arrival of this equipment in our military, they will be able to to overcome it, i understand you correctly, not to overcome but to destroy the problems of the russians, to destroy, therefore, more than 150 stream-liter weapons, in addition to all this, i draw everyone's attention to the fact that canada transmits the so -called shot, well, that shot, that projectile and the powder charge are guided by gps, that is well, that's all fantastic, yes, my friends, is it possible to get into a closed or open hatch of a tank, eh, do you have something to add? i apologize to ivan to hope that this is a high-tech weapon, that is, one or two shots hit the object, there is no need to drop a hundred or two hundred shells there, and when there they consider that

they gave us 40,000 e shells there, this is literally there for a day or two of active hostilities, wait a second, well , this is a day or two of active hostilities, according to the old school, when you release shells there one by one there until the barrel turns red, and here a few shots are moving, the equipment is moving, this is another shot is moving, this is an active link there and to the gps, which when i said i will go to the satellites, data from data, intelligence data, satellite intelligence, radio intelligence, that is, we are winning technologically in the complex, ivan, regarding the potential of the enemy, yes i would like to understand to what extent we constantly see that manpower and equipment are being destroyed. well, we can somehow say that we remember these statements at the beginning of the war that russia had the potential for a couple of weeks. it has been the third month already. we can say with the exhaustion of the technical

technological enemy will be very careful, well , the enemy still has strength, he has a really large number of ammunition depots, well, how not to be cool. it is difficult to say, eh, to make an analysis of how much they are still combat-capable, how relevant they are there they are stored for 20-30 years, are there soviet samples left, how safe are they even for those russians who do not release or explode these munitions during operation or movement of the russians, there are still cruise missiles unfortunately, it was not often said, but already there more than 1400 old people were killed on the territory of ukraine. this is a micro-auto with missiles and now. as far as i know , russia is trying to raise those cruise missiles from the ship of moscow that sank. well, at the very least, these are the steps they are trying to take. how many more years are left in they are unknown, but i know for sure that they will use them against the civil infrastructure of ukraine. that is, they need ukraine to

be completely deprived of any powerful industry, it will become agrarian, and this is not will allow ukraine to receive uh, well, the economy , that is, the economy is completely destroyed, that is, there will be no export of our goods, and they are trying to kill ukraine with this, the destruction of bridges, yes, mr. gennadiy, briefly on aviation, about the potential, you understand what, well, i want to add a little to my colleague there, that the amount