and er, the ukrainian side will not have er, er, technical, political , organizational ak capabilities. that is, we are not just simulating this situation e in order to continue offensive operations and, accordingly, to throw the russian aggressors out of the territory of ukraine in general, er, it is possible while er the background for these negotiations is the most active hostilities, yes, in the eastern direction, in the southern direction . and the effectiveness of this negotiation process will actually be what happens on the front because the result of the negotiations will be formed there and not at the negotiating table in turkey or in the virtual space during these virtual meetings, so in fact you will have the result eh blog to a certain extent just to

crystallize yes the victory that the ukrainian side is getting in the eh east and in the south, well actually eh i think that the russians will be more willing to talk with the ukrainian side and more willing to make concessions when will the ukrainian army threaten not only their current positions. where did they go after the start of this active second phase and actually after the start of a full-scale war on february 24? and when the ukrainian army will begin to threaten directly in the whole of crimea and the russians will understand that the ukrainian army has all the resources and political support of the international community in order to completely liberate ukraine from the russian presence, and here i think we will see very a noticeable break in the position of the russian side in their desire to really just have productive negotiations and not to create a propaganda

picture of taras, we talked a lot today about her participation in potentially this conflict, here is the u.s. ambassador to chisinau, kent longson, on the air of rtr moldova tv channel, he said that the us still sees no signs of a possible military threat to moldova after the start of russia 's invasion of ukraine. there was nothing to indicate a threat to moldova and that it could become a target of hostilities, the ambassador said, quote, we have to assess the safety of us citizens and our diplomats every day, and we share the results of these assessments with our colleagues and partners. at the same time , due to the deterioration of the security situation in occupied transnistria, a number of countries, including the us, have called on their citizens to leave immediately . this region , ambassador taras said.

territory, no one is going to expel them from there, evict them and put military pressure on them. the main thing is that the war does not spread to the territory of moldova. to help myself so as not to restrain a group of up to 5,000 russian military personnel there on its eastern and western borders in order to free its brigades there that are restraining them. well, help the brothers as well moldovans to liberate their territory, why so? well, i would say that moldovans are now indifferent to the possibility of a final solution to the transnistrian issue, even by the forces of the armed forces of ukraine, which do not pretend that they could simply destroy the russians there, please . well, it seems to me that one of the key reasons why do we see such an attitude, it is what uh for

uh, well, in fact, the last few decades and uh, the occupation of the russian federation of parts of the territory of moldova uh, the church, the party let's say so it has never become a factor in such a severe destabilization of the situation inside the country, primarily the security situation, that's why these latest shellings and, er, er, shootouts there, yes , about which the representatives of this transnistria are talking about, and there were only incidents including those related to russian military facilities on this territory, that is why it had such a resonance, because, in principle, for moldova, this russian presence and russian occupation have become part of the internal domestic political agenda, yes. that is, well, we know very well the representatives of the politician maxim zelenskiy, who, based on the actual russian presence and the fact itself, as if the existence of

this so-called device are conducting active political activities yes, in the highest political bodies of the state, and in principle. well, if this indicates that, at least at the last stage, the russian presence of political and military forces does not constitute for e.e. moldova as a whole and for them citizens, it does not acquire such unambiguously dangerous or er crisis signs. well, in principle, for the time being a-and by the forces a-and which were er last week and this too we er are aware that the authorities of moldova at least they don't fully understand how to act

in this situation, this is another market in the picture that, in principle, neither the government nor society are ready to accept the fact that the presence of russians is always a risk. yes, there is always a risk of political escalation, and as we have seen in ukraine already there since 2014, it is a lot of blood and for the military the security of the state and the integrity of even the territory of the life of citizens. and ukrainian society is definitely ready for similar actions against the russian military outside the borders of ukraine on the territory of russia or moldova. so it is enough to look at the reaction of social networks to what is happening in the border regions of russia yes, on this oil tank fire, on oil depots, and in warehouses with ammunition, and so on, yes, in principle , well, we perfectly understand that ah, well, that’s right, as the deputy minister of defense of

great britain said, yes uh, the possibility of transferring hostilities to the contiguous territory of ukraine, uh, regions, yes, regions, first of all, of the russian federation , this is in principle absolutely logical for example, it is logistics further because logistics the problem not only for their physicists is already on the territory of ukraine, but also in the adjacent regions from where they replenish the same fuel models, materials, ammunition, and in this way we eliminate the risks and threats to your military security, we can do the same absolutely clearly and consciously to do in other vectors in other directions from where the russians will want or will announce that they ah well if they are strengthening their military continent their military potential for conducting an operation against the armed forces of ukraine is another matter for moldova, and in fact, in these occupied territories

, there are too few russian troops for this, that is, they can perform some tasks at the tactical level . they can’t anyway. they need reinforcements either from the sea of ​​the black sea data of the russian black sea fleet, or as the russians said at the beginning that they would send additional military transport aircraft there with equipment and were encouraged by what the ukrainian side absolutely logically correctly said that all these ports will be shot down and only they will fall into the zone of action of ukrainian air defense systems. thank you taras . political scientist, address , welcome to eastern europe, the german bundestag burned down the provision of heavy weapons to ukraine, what was the last argument, and what is the current situation with germany's support for ukraine, well, at the level of

people, not only politicians" you now asked about the support of uh people yes yes yes yes well and in light of the approved provision of heavy weapons to ukraine by the last buddhiststag first of all i apologize that i will speak in russian so it will be faster uh, the society about this heavy weapon is as if separate in its support uh and uh , while there was still a majority for the weapon of choice, now uh, it's enough such

there is an open letter from cultural figures who opposed the delivery of this heavy weapon because people are afraid that this will somehow involve germany in the russian-ukrainian war , these are some celebrities, your famous people, cultural figures are urging the authorities not to give ukraine weapons a few famous singers there and so on. well, these are mostly people who are not very interested in politics and do not understand eastern europe very well. well, this is such a traditional german sophistry. russia's support is more likely to be a fear of being a part of this war, that's what it will turn into a creative world war, that's what will drag nato and germany into war, let's give it a and these artists and culture there, they don't discuss the

information of the british child count who a week ago appeared that since the 14th year, germany , together with france and italy, supplied russia with a quarter of a billion dollars worth of military equipment, weapons, missiles, bombs, and heavy weapons, to circumvent sanctions, this is not a question look now in germany plus a good one from gas yes, there were sanctions there at all, and uh-uh, it still hasn’t arrived. how would uh-uh, this is a discussion . how much do i observe it with the german public, and uh -uh, it hasn’t come yet, uh-uh somehow i didn't notice it yet, uh, apparently there were some violations of the sanctions, so there were some big spacers, well, i haven't come across it yet. this is a video of the british newspaper telegraph

published an article in which it is said that only germany and german companies sold goods to russia dual use which then was used for weapons in the amount of 121 million euros, these are only german companies, of this total amount, which is 273 million, there are also french, italians, bulgaria, austria, and what are those goods that have been supplied since the 14th year to circumvent sanctions, this is already for ukrainian viewers says the british detail, he played like that, and the actual weapon, and here is such and such a technology, eh, doubled, eh, well, which can also be used for military purposes, eh, well, i hope that this will also lead to some kind of investigation, and there may be a trial against these companies, england, for which arguments do you have? well, perhaps these people can be understood as they

are afraid for themselves and their children. well, i mean the german intelligentsia, which is now opposing the provision of heavy weapons to ukraine. well, it is obvious that these weapons, which germany in particular supplied russia can u-e return to germany u-e ​​other way so more aggressive and what arguments do you have do you agree with this position or not u-e no definitely and it is necessary to say that in general most of the german intelligentsia and political elite and u-e the population is also in favor of this support, too , with heavy weapons and of course against these supplies, if there were any technologies that could be used for the army, there is a discussion about this, but i i would have said well, how do i think this is the general eh mainstream somehow still supports this decision, too, regarding the supply of heavy weapons eh for ukraine eh, so

sometimes i also can’t. it seems to me that the german position is distorted what is happening in germany is also connected with the fact that it is germany it has its own big problems with the military and technical support of its army. this is a chip, but germany is now in the light of the war and aggression of russia against ukraine, and it is possible that this is the beginning against the whole of europe. it raises the question: are we ready? suddenly, what is the situation with the defense of the power of germany? is located in in such a favorable geographical situation, it is a

member of the eu and nato, and it is surrounded by friendly countries, and for this reason, it is for germany that everything is not so. the tube will discuss more military topics and a large budget was adopted for such a restructuring of the german army, although this will not even lead to the strengthening of the german army, but simply to the fact that it will become in general, there is no readiness, she is probably for me now war-ready ukrainian army then sometimes too expectations so to speak can be exaggerated what about military-technical cooperation on the part of ukraine germany is not a military state address pro-russian default i wanted to ask you yesterday russia prevented a default on

its enemy by making a payment at the last minute , the representatives of the us treasury and the voice of america reported everything about gold and foreign currency reserves located outside the country. but earlier the ministry of finance of russia stated that it tried to make a payment in the amount of 649 million dollars to be paid on april 6 at the expense of two bonds to the american bank jbl morgan, and the case at that time, the increased strengthening of sanctions introduced for the war in ukraine, did not allow to accept the payment, so moscow tried to make the payment bor in rubles investors and rates new companies agencies did not believe that russia will be able to return to convert rubles into dollars before the end of the thirty-day grace period next week, this led to the assumption that moscow is moving towards a historic default, however , the default did not occur. your assessment of this payment on the

last day and when is the next. when will the next day for russian payments on its external obligations come ? russia has but i would like to finally have some kind of significant effect of these sanctions, so far i think this is one of the problems of all this communication between russia and requests so far well, ordinary russians are not very much feels these sanctions and that's why there are still no special protests and the sanctions turned out to be such that they only develop their effect over time, and of course, in the situation in which ukraine is now, that's not exactly what there should be

some immediate effects of these sanctions, and i hope that this is not the case. the debt will still have more significant consequences. well, maybe someone in the west is interested in not bringing russia to bankruptcy. well, i can't argue here. of course, for the whole west, but in general, there is a group of in different western countries, mainly the trade union - these are firms and industry associations that oppose the sanctions or the harshness of these sanctions, which are accepted, which partially achieve the fact that the sanctions do not have such followers as they

would like, well, in germany, this er, it is related to the fact that there is still er, some dependence in particular, the german industry is dependent on energy sources from russia, it is decreasing, and there is serious demand during and there are already successes in reducing the import of russian energy sources, but in particular, the dependence on gas energy imports and there are already many enterprises that would simply, probably, have closed down if they stopped this import now, and that's when the trade unions also come into play and oppose the energy embargo once president zelenskyi - ukrainskyi the president said that ukraine needs about seven billion dollars every month to support

its own economy, is there any way for ukraine to get a positive loan, and in general to receive this money as a donation to support its own existence ? uh, about which germany is talking about , uh, economic support, uh, support for industrial infrastructure regulations, that's probably it , that's how this kind of help is, where germany can be a more effective uh, here's a partner for what about the military-technical sphere of ukraine, and i think it will also find greater support in uh, or also non-ambivalent uh and not divided support in german society, then how is this supply of weapons - this is somehow too much for the germans -е так сакаца е-е risky or well for

many е-е unfortunately, thank you for the address, the german political scientist was in touch with us, and yuriy podorozhny , a political technologist, is already joining yuriy. congratulations , the united states does not believe in the existence of a threat as of today e- russia's use of nuclear weapons e-e armed e-e yes, i will read now, well, that is, they are constantly monitoring this situation, this potential strike, which could be, but they say that the united states does not believe in the existence of the threat of using russian nuclear weapons, despite the recent escalation of moscow's rhetoric regarding the possibility and use, but the quote looks so interesting we continue to monitor their potential every day as much as possible and we do not assess that there is a threat of using nuclear weapons and there is no threat to nato territory, said a high-ranking official in

the ministries of defense of the states monitor only their own security against this strike by nato countries, uh, how much of this threat remains in ukraine, because it could be the tactical use of this same weapon. this statement does not apply to us correctly. well, i don't think that we does not apply. because when the united states announces a nuclear strike or nuclear weapons of the russian federation, it applies to absolutely everyone, the only thing is that this statement is probably more reassuring for the domestic american consumer or in fact, if we talk about where and how far the russian federation is ready to go, i would not rule out the possibility of any development and various scenarios, therefore, talk about the fact that there is no such threat. yes, i will even tell you why it

will develop and why this threat will grow more and more the more successful the ukrainian army will be at the front, the more such a threat will exist. because in reality, putin is in such a state today that he cannot lose this war, and you and i understand this very well, there are several ways of the development of events, the signing of another worthless piece of paper with the russian federation, which can be called peace, a truce is a truce, but there is another development of events, the ukrainian army will increase its offensive, throw out the russians, systematically throw out the russians from the ukrainian territory, so you know today to declare that tomorrow putin uh, ready to use nuclear weapons or any of the variations. well, that's right, the americans are speaking correctly at the moment, no, but you were just

, uh, thinking about the economic situation, weren't you? you see how smoothly europe and the united states of america support the russian federation , they give it the opportunity, on the background of all these sanctions that have been introduced, they allow them to reformat, so the situation will change rapidly, we in ukraine understand that we have our own business to continue actively as a foreign yes and uh, military policy towards the russian federation, and events can really have any consequences, any scenario, yuriy , well, these russian talk shows are propagandistic, they are already setting up russian society for the fact that russia cannot lose. and if it cannot lose, then it will use nuclear weapons. in principle, i think that russian society is already ready to use these weapons, but look. well, the pain threshold in our country has been increased many times over in

ukrainian society if it was the use of weapons on the second on the third day of the war, it is possible that it had some kind of psychological effect, now i am not sure, that is, even if it is used tactically, nuclear weapons will be destroyed, god forbid some small ukrainian city or district of some of a big city. well, what will be the effect of this action? let's start with the statement of russian propagandists. they make me very happy because the rhetoric has really changed from the beginning of the war from raising eyebrows, and you don't know whether in berlin or kyiv there will be troops from raising eyebrows, so today they are talking about that we, i'm sorry, we were short on words and now we need to figure out what to use next, you and i understand that even if, er, the russian federation uses nuclear weapons, well, it's obvious that even there it's tactical

obviously, the consequences for the russians will be, in short, this use will open the door to the western countries for more active assistance on the one hand, and on the other hand, military intervention, because you and i understand what the use of nuclear weapons is, it means that the world is, for the first time, from there eh forties will get actually eh thing that they are fighting against all this period talking about non-fulfilment taking on some guarantees there and so on and so similar to that use for me the use of such and such scenario as you say only means that russia, and it is correct to say that putin in this case will be driven into a dead end and he will feel personal danger because everything else suits him in principle, he is satisfied today and

the economic situation and what is happening in ukraine of course they wanted more but nevertheless for today russian globally, the federation, having not received any strategic advantage, in principle behaves in such a way that the southern way to the land, the way to the well, is breaking through to the present day hysteria is such i do not see with on the part of the russian federation, mr. yurii. how do you predict the development of the situation? what did we agree with mr. movland from germany? he says that cultural figures in germany also speak out against providing ukraine with heavy weapons. well, in order not to be drawn into the great war. supplied russia with weapons and built nord stream-2 turbines in the occupied crimea. well, by the way,

all this oil is also money that goes to the war, which germany buys from russia and continues to buy before, well, can you call it pacific position, that is, if they didn't want war. maybe they didn't do it. are people not connecting? well, when we talk about the war and the pacific position in germany, the germans are allies of the russian federation, they were active in the previous years, building up troops, berlin, moscow, beijing and e. germany is no less interested than the other three countries in building such an axis, we saw with you that in this way germany tried to oppose the united states of america and to have some kind of position of its own, a new position, because if you and i are going to understand that we remember that after the second world war, germany was the main ally of the united

states of america in europe, so today we can say that the germans are greatly impressed, or those who make the final decisions are greatly impressed by the war, and that germany did not prepare for this war, but germany by his decisions during merkel's time, it was not the flow of an aggressor, but in 2014, when russia annexed crimea and started a war in the donbas, did the role seem to mean something like that? i must have emotionally clicked on my computer when i was talking about this double position of germany, on the one hand, we are against the war, and on the other hand, we were supplying russia with weapons and building nord stream-2, well , such an interesting question. there is a difficult

logistical situation, we hope the world will come to the point that russia is a murderer and all economic relations with it must be interrupted, first of all, the more money the murderer has, the more opportunities he has to buy weapons and kill not only a specific country, but go ahead and kill absolutely everyone and liberate the entire civilized world from this very civilization , we have more news right on the course, anna eva melnyk is already ready to tell us about it, egor checherenda was with you all morning on the 66th day of the war between russia and ukraine and thank you, colleagues. after the war, ukraine will be able to sell electricity to the eu countries in exchange for gas, and in the sumy and chernihiv regions it was forbidden to approach the border, not only in a few moments