maybe it won't happen, although the enemy is threatening one more thing. by the way, it's an interesting topic about what the negotiations between russia and ukraine will be about, because the enemy is trying to find out through various diplomatic channels whether they will lift sanctions if they concede something. we will talk later, we will have a guest with whom we will talk about this and now we are ready to talk about the situation outside of ukraine, of course, with reference to so now i will be ready now yuri fizer, he has a lot of interesting things for you today prepared is even somewhat unexpected. and what a lot of information. well, as yuri is always ready to shock and inform yuriy. good evening. good evening to you. good evening to vasyl. good evening to everyone who joined the big broadcast. well, i don't know if it will shock, but the information is obviously what i will provide. in particular, about such military and humanitarian aid from france, finland, which further wants to join nato more, and in moscow they will show a plane, a ship of the day, on which he

can escape from his own citizens simply and other things in a moment in the world about ukraine column, but let's start with this: russia is an aggressor. for us, this is not news, for the world, it is not news, but with such words . that's what pentagon spokesman john kirby called the country of the mokshan swamps, and the kremlin's statements about the nazis in ukraine and in general called them strange and senseless, according to him, are very difficult compare putin's rhetoric with what he is actually doing in ukraine well, next is mr. kirby's quote, innocent people are killed with shots to the back of the head, their hands are tied behind their backs, pregnant women are killed, hospitals are bombed, this is the end of the quote, the level of such cruelty according to mr. kirby, the world has not yet fully appreciated it, but it will definitely appreciate it and all the guilty will be punished for the

crimes committed in ukraine, but in russia. they are even offended after he tells them the truth. well, the truth is, we all know it well. france sent ukraine 615 million tons of aid. the president of the country, emmanuel macron, wrote about this on his page on the twitter microblogging network, at the same time humanitarian and military aid, and more in a conversation with the president of ukraine volodymyr zelenskyi, the french president assured that paris will continue to help us in the future. well, everything is for the protection of the sovereignty and territorial integrity of ukraine, but the bfm tv channel reported today with a link at the fountains in the elysée palace so that president macron also promised to provide ukraine with self-propelled artillery installations caesar well,

first of all, thanks to mr. macron for winning the the elections, and of course thanks for caesar who will help us in for caesars who will help us in the fight against the aggressor, a number of countries are urging their citizens to leave the territory of moldova, in particular france, which bulgaria and israel will provide. i am at the moment, and if it has accidentally slipped there, then the moldovan ministry of foreign affairs asks to return immediately, explaining that all warnings are simply part of the standard security protocol in accordance with which the ministries of foreign affairs of various countries act, at the same time, we assure you that foreign diplomatic missions remain in kisheniv, this does not remind you of anything similar, because it reminds me of something similar that happened in ukraine when, before the russian invasion of ukraine, on february 24, in a few

months, even in a month no, well, for a few weeks, the diplomatic institutions of various countries of the world advised citizens not to come to ukraine, so i am now very worried about moldova in particular. well, let's continue with moldova, russia may soon intensify the provocations under a foreign flag in the unrecognized transnistria, in an interview with the romanian publication digi 24, the deputy secretary general of the north atlantic alliance, mircea joana, said that these provocations will not pose any danger to moldova; the main goal of the russians is to distract the attention of the armed forces forces of ukraine, which are stationed in the west of the country and in the odesa region, although mr. joani did not reject the fact that in the future the kremlin may try to destabilize the situation in moldova itself.

taking into account the information that i told you before that diplomatic institutions ask their citizens of different countries to ask their citizens not to go to moldova, so who knows, more and more people are in favor of joining nato, support for joining nato has increased to 65%, the process shows the latest survey results from helsining sanomat yes, joining the alliance is supported by 6% more citizens than a month ago, while only 13% are against membership and 22% have not yet decided on their position, in general, the current level of support is the highest among sheep period of measurements, i will remind you that finland and sweden will probably not wait for nato at the end of june and will submit applications for joining the alliance already in may. meanwhile, moscow continues to warn both countries about the consequences of membership in the north atlantic alliance. well, before the broadcast, i

found information that the president of finland er, on the 12th, he intends to announce whether such a country will join nato, and i am sure that he announced that yes, but at 17:24 on may, finland and sweden are going to submit applications together we will wait for these dates for the introduction. and i will tell you all about them in detail, but the president of turkey , recep tayyip erdogan, discussed the development of turkish-french relations even before the victory of emmanuel macron in the second round of the elections, the head of the turkish republic announced this today while returning from of saudi arabia, where he was on an official visit, mr. erdogan emphasized that even then he expressed the hope that it was max and macron that relations between the two countries would improve significantly. well, let's listen to the live stream we

listen to the speech of the president of turkey, recep tayyip erdogan, the defeat of the extremists in france is a victory for our whole world. as it turned out , macron's opponents simply do not analyze the sociological structure of ukraine very well. in the second round of the presidential elections, emmanuel macron showed his opponent's demonstrably hostile attitude towards islam and the practice of hijab seeds. and i think that they not only underestimated the situation in france, and in particular the leader of the far-right, marin lepen, underestimated the situation above all, to my deep conviction putin, after all, he bet on marina lepen, she lost, macron won. well, it is better for us. the ukrainian and russian delegations are discussing the possibility of lifting sanctions against moscow. this is what the minister of foreign affairs of russia, sergei lavrov , said in an interview with the chinese agency xinhua. in addition, according to the head of the foreign policy department of our to the great regret of the northeastern neighbor

, the negotiators are also discussing the non-nuclear, non-aligned and demilitarized status of ukraine, as well as guarantees of its security. well, once again some kind of denazification . i have not heard the reaction of the ukrainian side to this statement, but the fact that more and more calls are being heard from moscow to cancel the sanctions proves that the sanctions do affect them, and not only do they work, but they hit painfully their economy, and all of them, and that's why they're trying to get rid of these sanctions as soon as possible, but i don't know, it won't work as soon as possible. even if we defeat them, i'm sure that these sanctions should still remain so that nothing like this happens again in the near future in the world. three times he asked and three times he did not give pope francis three times he appealed to the president of the movchan region vladimir putin about the humanitarian corridor from

mariupol and the same number of times the president of onkostan refused and at the same time cynically replied that and then the quote cannot guarantee safety during the evacuation reported about this italian newspaper and messenger with reference to sources pope francis even wanted to send his trusted cardinal for humanitarian affairs, konrad kraievsky, to the field, but that didn't happen either, and one more the option offered by pope francis to bring the civilian population out of azovstal on a ship under the flag of the holy see, however, all efforts were in vain, so the pope calls ukrainians and russians brothers, but he cannot agree with moscow, he cannot , because they were not brothers and we never will be. and in conclusion very interesting information is being prepared to run away and at the same time showing ordinary russians exactly what they will run away on at the shaba military parade

that in moscow on may 9 a russian plane il-80 will fly over red square created on the base il-96 this was reported by the ministry of defense of the aggressor country. it should be noted that this aircraft was specially created to transport the president of russia in the event of a nuclear strike in russia. the ministry of defense says that it will be used to provide communication and command of the troops. well, in fact, it will be something like putin's flying bunker on which he will simply escape from his citizens to a safe place, he thinks he will escape, but they will get him anywhere. i'm starting to prepare for tomorrow so that already in tomorrow's broadcast you will receive the freshest and most objective information about what is being said about ukraine in the world and how they are helping us, well, now our broadcast continues, then return espresso to the

air, the truth is that our viewer needs things anyway, the work in lviv is very difficult and responsible. it seems to me that during the war it is not quite right to close channels that give a broad view of politics. the more independent snakes there are in the country, the more honest, high-quality information, and i would like such radical actions not to be taken during the war, and especially what concerns the espresso channel, because usually those programs and those comments that i had the opportunity to view the programs that i watched , they very widely and quite honestly described the situations that are well, in particular in politics and those

comments offered by espresso, it makes you think more, better, better understand the situation , the president and zelenskyi, return espresso to the air let's protect the information front together, glory to ukraine with you during the war information front of ukraine fm halychyna together to victory turn the wind espresso the fifth and direct sign the petition on the fourth of april the rrt concert was thrown from the digital airwaves without warning ukrainian independent tv channels espresso the fifth and direct this is while in ukraine the war with russia, including the

information war, is a restriction of freedom of speech, it is a restriction of the rights of millions of viewers to receive information, it harms the national interests of ukraine, turn the wind espresso, the fifth and direct entry to the website of the cabinet of ministers of ukraine register, find the page of the petition, familiarize yourself with its text and press the sign button to protect freedom of speech in ukraine . outside the borders of ukraine perhaps we will add something else on one topic so exactly, simply so that you understand what is happening. so to speak, on the international diplomatic fronts, first of all, a-a yuria osmolovska, executive director of the institute of eastern security europe is in touch with us ms. yulia, i congratulate you

good day, and here we will discuss several topics, but you know how briefly i will start with this one. so, there is to be a meeting in the g20 format of the g20 in indonesia, and putin and zelensky have been invited there after all, biden, the president of the united states of america, said that if putin will participate, he will not participate as brothers. what do you think is a principled position, and why, after all, indonesia, which had the right to invite? after all, she also invited zelenskyi if you understand putin that there will be a conflict, you understand that it won't happen that easily, please. well , indonesia had the right to invite those whom it considered necessary, and we can see in principle the reaction to russian aggression in ukraine , mostly the majority of countries that condemn

this aggression and in fact have already formed an anti-putin coalition if we focus on those countries that i participated in a meeting at the rammstein base a few days ago. well, indonesia is not part of this group of countries and in principle that is why such an invitation is possible. for now it is just a protocol gesture, and now it is very important to see how the situation will develop in the future, because really, our president would also have the right to reject this invitation in the event that such an invitation is given to the president of the russian federation, he will support it and the position of the united states here it is also very predictable absolutely consistent and it should be welcomed and now we are just waiting for indonesia's reaction to er these for these threats because actually i really think that not only the united states is here can take such a principled position, but also

our partners from the european union, do you want questions and safety, you actually fly there somewhere between australia and malaysia, it is risky, knowing full well that the russian side can also try to strike some kind of but now it's not about that, it's up to the guards from certain services that deal with the president's security to decide, we'll see how it resolves, well, but the important thing is that in principle zelensky was invited there. well, putin also agreed, by the way, because there's already a conversation, here we are now let's move on to this topic, there is a conversation about what certain diplomatic channels are allegedly looking for in russia in order to present the situation and let's somehow come to an agreement, maybe we will lift the sanctions, maybe a peace agreement, and what will we leave, and what will we give, and where will we go, where will we go, and here is lavrov declares that negotiations are underway with the ukrainian side on the conclusion of a peace agreement and the lifting of sanctions, and the adviser to the head of the presidential office, mykhailo podolyak,

said that lavrov was not present for the negotiations , so he cannot talk about it, nor about sanctions is it said or not? who can deceive here, we understand that in principle lavrov deceives almost constantly, well, but still, please, there are several communications of diplomatic negotiations, more from the ukrainian side and the russian side. well, if we talk about the level of foreign ministers, then it is necessary let me mention only the only meeting that has taken place since the time of russia's invasion of ukraine, this is the meeting on march 10 in ankara, when it did not lead to any results and the parties initially remained on their own positions. and secondly, those impudent comments that mr. lavrov allowed himself to make in response to the press saying that russia did not invade ukraine. well, they actually, for me personally , completely crossed out russian diplomacy as such.

that is, it is simply one of most of the mouthpieces of the propaganda machine, and indeed, podalyak is right when he says that lavrov , who is not participating in these negotiations, well, he actually cannot comment on what exactly the parties to the negotiations are discussing in general. although i am more than i am convinced that lavrov knows what both sides are talking about, but the question of sanctions was not really raised. at least from the comments we heard from the ukrainian side, from the russian side, from official publications, and secondly, is it surely necessary to start with this if the russian side were trying now to find some opportunities for exit and a compromise solution, it would at least agree to a temporary truce on the occasion of the easter holidays there, and especially when such a

request is made three times by the pope of rome several times he is the secretary general of the united nations and, in fact, for this he comes to moscow and once again conducts negotiations with the president of the russian federation, and then during his meeting in kyiv they receive more missile strikes on kyiv, so it is said that russia has some uh, at least there is reason to hope that someone will go to meet her today. well, it is completely incompatible with reality that russia planned and could expand the conflict zones. well, let's say in kazakhstan, well, in belarus , there is nothing to expand there, and so are the troops they stand and behave like they do at home, well, moldova , i understand, i fall out here. the question is that this , er, it can be pressure on it, it can be pressure on nato , because in principle, it is er, nato countries already border there, there are the interests of romania. well, in principle, this is not an expansion of the expansion of the danger, but here they

declare possible provocations in moldova, how realistic is this and how should ukraine act now, which in principle uses its armed forces to conduct hostilities, we have a very tense situation in the east in the south and well, it still occurs here the problem is not the problem of moldova, please a-a first of all, i want to say that i actually interpret this activation in the moldovan direction er-er it is more like er-er a smoke screen or er-er a special effect that the russian military leadership resorts to with something to demonstrate at least some movements, some dynamics in their offensive company, which it has now started to carry out in ukraine, because there are no more other victories to show off, as until may 9, it is unlikely that they will receive any significant victories, especially those strategic goals that they set to at least reach the administrative borders of the

donetsk luhansk oblasts, therefore a natural question arises of shifting attention to some other region to some other object in order to be able to convey it to the russian consumer from tv screens, therefore, for me , such an activation is precisely at the beginning of may, it is explained primarily by this political defeat that the russian troops are currently receiving in the east and south of ukraine, if we are talking about nato's reaction, it can also be said moderately on today, it did not cause hysteria in the nato countries, well, the united states. in this regard, they hedged their convoys of their troops to the border with moldova on romanian territory, but nato's statements say that we expect provocations, but the risks of a significant military invasion. and the capture of moldova by the russian side, so far the nato countries are not

observing these provocations, we see that their first results and the dynamics that were demonstrated are, in principle, again not achieved the psychological effect that the russian side was counting on, that is, even attempts to predict the actions of the ukrainian armed forces. well, they were not supported by any objective comments, even those comments that were given directly by the leadership of the political leadership of transnistria, they are so of a rather contradictory nature and there is no unequivocal perception that these were the actions of the ukrainian armed forces, and regarding the reaction of the positivists of the ukrainian armed forces and our political leadership, i would like to note here a fairly balanced the reaction, that is, no one gave in to this provocation , and from the statements that we hear from our political leadership, they understand the risks, they

understand the real presence of the russian military contingent that is on the territory of transnistria, and to what extent there is a possibility of serious offensive actions for in order to draw away ukrainian military resources in the western direction to the western border er. therefore, so far the situation looks controlled and balanced, well, by the way, let's move on to the subject of lend-lease, why is it important, you know, they say that the united states they always try to use different options. and when all this does not work, they do as it should be done, but english for ukraine is actually the united states. we give you everything in order for you to win and just for comparison you know the capitalization of one company in the united

states was not now to advertise but it is a world-famous company bigger, let's say, than the stock market of russia before the war a budget-california more than the budget of the russian federation it's just so that we understand who gives us the land, the forest, and the war, i'll remind you once again that resources are money, and in russia, fakes are already starting, now prepare that you will pay off debts until the hundredth generation, we're still talking about debts let's talk, but this decision is how important it is and how much it affects. perhaps it paralyzes the enemy. well, it is absolutely unprecedented. you can even say that such a procedure has been used for the first time in a century or the second time in twenty years . by the united states eh and eh, by the way, for comparison eh, to note the uniqueness of this decision. look, the united states did not introduce such a procedure neither in the situation in afghanistan nor in any other conflicts where

the united states was more closely involved and even with its military contingent that for us from a political point of view, first of all, let's look at the result of the vote itself for this bill in the senate, it was supported unanimously in the house of representatives, 451 votes for 10 only against. that is, we can state absolutely consolidated support of both parties to ukraine against russian aggression, the second consequence is that it allows to completely remove the political tension that could be and has been at times in our relations with our western partners when their statements about political support and readiness to provide weapons were exposed to purely bureaucratic obstacles or some regulation that did not allow, let's say , to provide ukraine with the weapons that it wanted to get now, according to this law, ukraine can

get any weapon, any absolute with no has no restrictions. and the conditions for financing this process are really quite comfortable, and to this it is worth adding that the coordination headquarters has been created and is headed by the united states. with our partner countries from europe and others that help ukraine in order to direct all this military aid already in such a way so that there is no arbitrary chaos who provides how much and what he wants and that it really corresponds to the urgent and urgent needs of ukraine is a big plus in relation to how the russian mass media comment on it well, it really is them an absolute slap in the face because what can be said more for the consolidated support of the west, even many teeth began to talk about the real and anti-putin coalition that was formed on the basis of rammstein eh than this decision about eh providing

langleys and by the way, if we return to history you drew parallels with the previous decision during the second world war, then if you recall from the history textbooks that we passed in our schools that are from soviet times, you even later, the soviet union always did not want to comment in general, this procedure of granting allen-lease er and receiving these weapons by the allies of the united states er, because er, he considered it to a certain extent humiliating and wanted to actually show his role as a winner in the second world war, although really it was this decision about linglis that became what is called in western theory a game-changer, that is, what changed the game, what changed the balance of power, and so now exactly such a situation can happen in the war, uh, in russian aggression, in their attack on ukraine by the way about that one forest. there, the americans counted 2.6

billion dollars. well, we understand that it was the 45th year, and this could be multiplied by at least 10 somewhere, and then even more, this amount is significant, it is up to 50 billion dollars, if not more. and then the amount was reduced, and then, well, in the end, the russians refused to pay the old thing. he said that we paid with the blood of soldiers, then there were problems again. well, in the end, russia paid out of that total as much as 670,000.4 million in 2006. that is, we understand that she in principle , she did not pay anything, because 2.3 billion accrued is what so much was spent here in 1945. it is definitely not 674 million dollars, it is there, vrublovites, we can lend a little to someone in the houses and collect such an amount for the payment of the lend-lease, and that is why when we are now told that you will be there for generations to pay, that is how you paid almost 100 years, listen, well, not 100, it’s a bit less fucking there, first of all, secondly, the amount

of aid there, then consider that it was a langlist procedure for all countries, allies of the anti-hitler coalition, here aid is provided purely to ukraine, and in principle, uh, there are already conversations going on and already appropriate legal procedures have been initiated in order to confiscate all russian assets and thus force russia to pay all the reparations contribution for the er destruction for the damage it is currently doing in ukraine , and i think that if it comes to er financial the terms of this language, we, the united states, can settle it, including within the framework of compensation at the expense of russian assets, which does not remind you now of putin's behavior, uh, you know the behavior of a terrorist who understands that in in principle, he has been blocked, he can no longer escape, just take as many hostages as possible in the form of people in the form of territory so that later there will be something to trade, it is clear what will have to be done in general and so that you are not destroyed well, after all,

he has nuclear weapons, it is a risk for the world, at least so that you recruited as many people as possible to the territory in order to then negotiate the most favorable conditions for yourself, because what he is doing now in this situation is not similar to trying to defeat ukraine in principle. you will be able to do this at the expense of the territory of ukrainians, because i repeat that this game changer is a change in the strategic balance on the battlefield , it will now be in favor of ukraine, and more and more experts are saying that ukraine has a real chance to return its territories to the borders by 1991, but what is russia doing in such a treacherous taxi, as you mentioned, these are people and not for nothing. it is worth paying attention to the statements of the russian federation by the minister of foreign affairs lavrov that more than a million have already been exported