dumplings with cherries and here the chef has his secret ukrainian nation is the only nation that makes a little secret about dumplings with cherries i never add sugar inside that is i only add starch and i add a lot of sugar and water i make syrup and in fact the dough becomes sweet and the cherry on the inside remains sour ukrainian chef plans to remain on the gastronomic front, it will take so much to help ukraine with his skills this april everything take care 4th concert rrt illegally turned off the digital air ukrainian independent tv channels espresso fifth and direct, a

petition has been registered on the website of the cabinet of ministers of ukraine, in which it is demanded to return to the digital air of tv channels. first you need to register, it is very simple. go to the website petition kmu.gov.ua there go to the registration tab and enter all your data say your phone number and email, confirm all your data, enter the code that will be sent to your mobile, create a password, certify that you are not a robot, give consent to the processing of personal data, check all your data again and click the button register to complete the registration go to your specified email where the site letter will arrive click on the link in the letter that will return you to the petition site be your email password enter we return to the main page of the petition site open the petition for the return to the digital air

of the ukrainian tv channels espresso of the fifth and direct click the button to sign the petition will appear the inscription is signed your signature is confirmed and taken into account let's return ukrainian patriotic channels to the digital air together we will not allow them to be destroyed in ukraine freedom of speech with you during the war information front of ukraine fm halychyna together to victory i congratulate you, dear viewers, now on the air of the espresso tv channel, the famous polish historian, sovietologist , expert on international politics, mr. lukasz adamsky, we understand that history tends to repeat itself sometimes twice, sometimes three times , and now strangely enough, ukraine repeats where and what and

where and what it does not fundamentally repeat the history of the republic of poland in wartime, we are talking about the times of the second world war. but fortunately, in the ukrainian case, putin did not have any partners well, of course, except for some eritrea or one or the other, i don’t know of any other african state there , and we understand that the situation for ukraine is better, but we still see that putin has tried on stalin’s overcoat, if not hitler’s overcoat. good day, i would say that after all, with me, it is a tribute to hitler, because it is an attack on ukraine, yes, the argument is that in eastern ukraine, there is a russoist or russian-speaking population a and what and that and this population is threatened as they are

, it all very much reminds me of what i am saying hitler before the war about poland, what in the pomerania , i.e. in this part of the western part of poland, which was the subjugation of the authorities in the 19th century , is primarily experienced by the german-speaking population, which was not true, and that he is threatened with persecution by the polish authorities and then hitler had a lot of provocations, and the left had no provocations, but the attack on ukraine reminds me very much of hitler's attack on poland, that's another matter that later poland suffered a lot worse, worse fate than now, this is exactly what you are interrupting, just to remind the audience of our country, so that poland was attacked on the one hand by hitler and on the other hand by stalin , that is, two dictators united in their hatred and

desire to share should now be with no one wants to share the world with putin. that is how i would like to draw some parallels. the eastern neighbor of ukraine is waging a war against the will of the ukrainian people, the freedom of the ukrainian people, against ukrainian statehood , but also another neighbor of poland, and another ally who yes, everyone helps ukraine in 1939, the situation was different, on the first of september, germany attacked. and on september 17, the soviet union opposed the polish army against two such huge states , and such an army was impossible, and at the same time, it must be said that - russian, the leadership , yes, it left warsaw already on september 6-7, it was there for two, it was, of course, the whole time on the territory of poland, despite the fact that the head of

soviet propaganda, that it was the government, fled the country, it was not like that, it was also in birch, then in kremenets were taken in zalishchyki, but everything was not like that in warsaw, and here it turned out that ukraine and the ukrainian government were in the capital of ukraine all the time, and because of the fact that the allies helped ukraine a lot, i would say more than the allies of poland from 39 in the 20th year, we have uh, well, i am very happy because ukraine avoided the essence of what would cost fate. so we understand that if we are talking about the 39th year, then polish allies are formalized polish allies who promised to provide it with appropriate military assistance. war in france and great britain did not formally find themselves at war, but de facto they almost did not fight for poland , and historians know that, in principle, if it were not

for the enormous pressure from great britain, france probably would not have declared war against germany at all, but that’s all. but it’s good that here, england, great britain pressed on france on the third of september, of course, how did each other start, uh, i also started germany's war with the west and the allies . german airspace and distribute leaflets to the german population, and in addition, the french army occupied several villages on the german -french border. because, er, because the polish army will still lose this war, this campaign against germany, er,

and we just need time to prepare more for the war, and they, er, such a special faber conference blossomed, they decided to postpone the military er actions up to the spring of 1940 and how was the result? well, we know that germany first defeated poland and then er then er in er in may and june of er 40 to france if france had come forward and how it had taken on part of this burden of the war already in september of 1939, it is true that the fate of poland would also have been the same, i would have done otherwise, now it seems as if the world had learned the appropriate lessons, and it is possible this is exactly what is being said about specific historical lessons, because we see that europe has understood what if there is a war it will be affected by the european union, and america has also understood that if

international law is violated in such a violent, i don’t know , military way, then, accordingly, in general, the system of law throughout the world will simply fall apart, and they are so under the impression that they really took into account the lessons of history, yes, and this one, but it is not only the lesson of hitler's war against poland and also earlier the lesson of the munich agreement. so when czechoslovakia was forced to cede part of its territory to germany in 308, but this is also a conviction that if we cannot now to hold back the aggressor when he is waging a conventional war against ukraine, if we are not ready to pay the price for it then this political price will be much higher when putin starts to launch a non-conventional war war does not start a conventional

war, but begins to load the world with nuclear weapons, or in particular, in fact, they are not even hiding. there is no remedy. since it is only intimidation, but we understand that now it is intimidation, first of all, of western and public opinion, but if, for example , we think about such a very negative scenario as not uh, no, do not enter, but that putin occupied kyiv and threw some mario of the genetic regime, marina , by the way, stalin did this in the fourth and fourth years of the 40s and in the 45th year, and from that yes, there is an aggressor who would be so encouraged to make further demands and, for example, he would be concerned about the fate of the russian-speaking population in estonia in narva so a

if uh how if someone didn't take into account his demands well then uh world uh russian deformation reminded and we have nuclear weapons because of that of course this is a lesson in the epicenter of politics uh pacification of the aggressor well and in mistakes as they were made by the free world in relation to poland, well, were they mistakes, i don't know if they were attempts to feed the poles with meat to predators, yes, because we understand these two pillars of world democracy , we are talking about roosevelt, we are talking about the prime minister churchills, which arise in our history of geography great heroes, in fact, they did something dishonorable, if not completely dishonorable, to poland. of course, they did not want this, but stalin led them into such a situation when stalin took poland for himself, although even at the yalta conference they agreed on something else in the end. so you are talking about a puppet government. - now there was also an attempt, for example, by putin to restore the

yanukovych regime, so with the help of one or another falsifications, i am more than sure that he tried to sell it in the west, in the west it is not but churchill and roosevelt were forced to buy the so-called lublin government, that is, stalin's puppets, who were poles promoted by stalin, and in the end it ended with the fact that they communistized poland, but that's how it was. although i would bet on the difference between roosevelt and churchill. because if he recently published 9 documents on pro-soviet relations, he shows our tv viewers extremely useful for reading, well, most of them are in polish, but still luke, congratulations, you did a huge work and extremely important for a better understanding of how the allies played with their junior partner, in particular, there is not only about this, but there

of course it is this set of e-e documents in e-e. it concerns e-e many aspects of polish- soviet relations during the second world war , including taking into account the positions of the allies, but er churchill was the weakest partner in the big three a-a hmm because er great britain was also economically er weaker than the united states er this stalin thanks to the fragrant flesh of the population of the soviet union, but they didn't count europe as soviet corpses of soviet soldiers, it's true, but they didn't count, but on the other hand, it also made a huge contribution to the defeat of nazi germany, of course we understand that if it wasn't for lindsay, if it wasn't for strong help from the side of western democracy, apparently, the soviet union did not

stand, but that’s how it is, and here stalin has a strong political stake, and churchill was simply forced to maneuver between his solidarity and sympathy for poland. if -e loved n- loved poland poles, in particular, the polish prime minister and the commander-in-chief during the second world war, general sikorsky, who unfortunately died in a plane crash in 1943, then the next day in strange circumstances, we still don't know what exactly caused the ibratary disaster, but he , he, he, then, his successor, the prime minister, minister mykolaichyk, it is his face that appears on the cover of one of those stomies. he had this sympathy and wanted to help

poland in some way, but i am a partner. ruzvera as well as mau what he knew about poland, he had an absolutely italistic, italistic attitude towards stalin, he thought that this could be the quality of a partner in the construction of a new order of the world order after the victory over germany, plus, oh, roosevelt looked at england as a colonial empire and, of course, poland . in london, he was perceived as a protege of churchill, and therefore in those documents there is almost a lot of evidence of how roosevelt offered to a pole promised the defense of the polish polish state interest yes, but, in fact, i am not doing anything, and the church is reasonable, and that is why, because of it, here again there is a very interesting matter of

the church. according to international law, the soviet annexation of western ukraine and western belarus. it did not have any legal consequences. it was as simple as the occupation of crimea, but then the polish government was constantly forced to sign it. yes, but it happened only in august. 1945 and august 1945. so when this treaty was signed, it entered into force in february 1946, of course lviv is here, so is grodno, it was part of the soviet union, but during the second world war, this territory was not only was the zaporozhian territory legally polish, but the western allies recognized it, but they also understood that stalin did not give up his claim and therefore exerted enormous pressure for poland to agree to give up 48% of its

pre-war territory, old, new, and tomorrow, so that she hmm, as they promised, she was able to appreciate her freedom , and the london government was able to normally return to stalin's country somewhere in 1943. you were interested in me. which is disruptive, which will be independent, will be anti-soviet, plus any poltava approach to ukraine, that any ukrainian ukraine will be anti-russian, therefore, and what must be done to annihilate what we have seen now in putin's attempts, and stalin believed that any poland is polish, which will not under the control of the communists, will want to use the ukrainian card and play against the soviet union, that is why, again, it is interesting here, and the ukrainian argument of the negotiations regarding the fate of

lviv, galicia, in particular, played a huge role in those combinations of those diplomatic direct lines during the second world war, in any case stalin was simply not interested in the existence of a sovereign poland because he believed that it would always be anti-soviet, the worst thing was that everything ended with the so-called process of the 16th when representatives of the legitimate polish vlad was like that in the 45th year, they were actually lured by general sirov, who spoke under a different pseudonym, that is, one of the heads of the soviet punitive bodies lured them to negotiations, gave a guarantee, then they were arrested , taken to moscow, there a trial was held. well, the allies of poland, so to speak expressed their very deep concern and indignation well, but we understand that the last head of the ak was arrested and he

died at the hands of the mkb executioner, well, here it is rather just general kulitsky they were shot in the soviet prison somewhere on christmas eve of 1946, that is, accordingly, the prospects in ukraine would be similar if putin's stalinist plan began to be implemented. to the russian war and i see that they don't know anything new, they don't even know how to invent any other approaches, approaches , uh , how... and to the poles, the commonwealth of nations is more precise, but it stretched almost under kyiv, it was adopted in 19891, the first

constitution in europe, which i am talking about, which gave certain guarantees to different strata of the population, and it also gave, if hmm eh, she created the ground for further reform of the state. kateryna said that this is jacobinism, that it is some kind of influence of revolutionary france and that creates a threat to the russian empire. she created her own such eh, well, she took various polish traitors made her own counter-government, a confederation of governments, which she made in such a ukrainian town of a merchant, and on the then flat-russian russian border, e-e revenge began to fight back, but e-e did not succeed, e the king was forced to join this counter-government well, and then there was the second and third e separators in a row, this propaganda is very similar to the propaganda against the

maidan, what is this, something similar was also in the 20s , it seems in 1918, the bolsheviks who created the government in kharkiv, the bolshevik pseudo-government that they supported and said, well, what are we going to talk to the central rada if there is our own pocket bolshevik government, that is, and we see something similar in 1945, when they also began to implement the lublin government. so what about you, dad, 794th suvorov, for whom russia is so famous and the russians, he was, in fact, the killer of prague, the working class of the suburbs in warsaw. that's how it can be said. the right bank part of warsaw was also there when suvorov's troops entered, but they killed several thousands of poor children. women eh and this massacre wants no this is absolutely terrible as now the massacre of buch , then in 19 and that russian propaganda always

said that it is not fighting against, if russia is not anti-pov people, but against the nobility, against the action, so anti-polish elites of the nobility, or not as they said, some anti-russian now they also say that they not against about these ukrainians and not against what against the nazis yes against the bandera people against how and what the ukrainian elites who screwed up what screwed up the scientists yes uh with the west uh that is this textbook we already know that’s how few people talk about it that pushkin in every possible way supported russian imperial policy and propaganda, in particular against the poles, that is, pushkin openly called to do, for example, to suppress the poles as soon as possible. that is how in pushkin's two poems, it is an anniversary or a family and it is for the leaders of russia, but there it was simple if you read russian, every ukrainian at least reads russian with a dictionary yes, even there, it’s a shame,

for example, putin says, we can repeat it. yes , we can repeat it, we can do the prague massacre again, because pashkevich was the main commander. russian wax which er in 10-831 was taken from warsaw and submitted to the uprising of the poles er and we had a given point and the maidan actually so yes er was given to us by pushkin er the weak grandson of suverov and in the strict suvorov, well, this is the person responsible for the massacre of prague and, well, the second world war there, er, katyn crime, what happened, er, the germans, er, announced that they found the remains of the graves, they could, they could polonsky, er, martial law, of course, if you translate it like that, yes, no i know that the current russian-ukrainian war is something big ilovaisk, that is, when the nkvd shot polish officers who were prisoners of war

and were in official captivity, something like that. when they gave the green circle, the green corridor allowed the exit, they gave all the guarantees, after what they had done, they started shooting. and i would even compare it, and not only to kramatorsk after this terrible crime in kramatorsk, when the people who were waiting on the trains that were supposed to evacuate them to e-e were killed by a russian cruise missile, so what did the russian foreign ministry do, it said that we do not have any relation to this crime, it was the ukrainian army that killed those people in order to hurt the public and to make bad pr for russia. when the germans gave evidence that everything was so and so, the soviet union shot polish officers in katyn, then the polish government and about the fact that those documents were talking about it turned to the international red cross so that it would somehow investigate it, and stalin said no, no, this means that the polish government is with

hitler's germany and that this is a slander against the soviet union, and he demanded that or in order to the polish government officially supported the version that it was the germans who shot a at the bolsheviks. and if the government when the government refused, it a-a stopped and broke off diplomatic relations. and here is what the inner intuition tells us, as now a great international solitaire game will unfold, so because here it is not a question of the chessboard. we know in what way it will be sharpened, which states and countries of the continent it will affect. but this is no longer a local story, it is not a small story. well, i think that hmm. and what is happening now in the west, as if the

supporters of two positions say that everything must be done so that ukraine not only e it defended itself , but it also returned its territorial integrity , because only in this way will we be able to restore justice with the truth and defeat russia when this does not happen, when we make some kind of truce with russia. then russia will again want to step on she has ukraine. for example, this is the position of great britain. this is, of course, the position of poland and so on , but unfortunately i am also a recruiter . a large part of the germans would like to end the war as soon as possible, even at the cost of further territorial concessions, de facto will lose control over kherson region or over other fragments of western eastern ukraine, i am asking for it because

they are afraid of war, they are afraid of what putin can do and i believe that in this way it is possible to appease the appetites of the aggressor as, for example , chamberlain did for the english, german, and the french prime minister think in the 38th year and well, this is also a history lesson, so it is so in our country iron i think it is very important for ukrainians to read about the history of poland during the second world war because there are simply so many common points with ukraine and there are also many i would say that you can think of them as we call and stood polish the politicians did not have a single view on - even on what to do next eh when they stood in front of eh

demanded from stalin eh whether to cede sovereignty or to cede territory eh for the sake of eh saving eh hmm no depending on the country is everything like this and fight to the end i believe that ukraine should fight to the end but on the other hand well, as a participating historian i can say that poland poland tried to do this and it came out quite badly, well not just that poland tried but for some reason the allies failed because both churchill and roosevelt well, then roosevelt roosevelt died and truman was left, but they looked at the whole world, and poland was important for them, but not the main point, and stalin was a partner for them, but the question is, well, it’s at the level of the researcher’s political intuition, so how much more decent is it in the situation with ukraine is done by joe biden and boris johnson, if you compare, for example, with churchill and

roosevelt, i think that biden is much more honest than rusyk, and roosevelt would have had a huge influence on stalin and roosevelt even stalin's agents, and biden's policy is a lot to help ukraine, that's it . biden was the leader of the coalition that now supports ukraine and provides it with military military weapons in relation to johnson and churchill. well i have already said that i er and if i would always try to er protect prime minister churchill or i understood how they are in the conditions here there is, for example, such and such a very similar conversation that could even be the subject of a theatrical play the conversation between he churchill and the polish prime minister took place after their conversation

conversations with the stalinists and the devil says yes, you must now sign an agreement with stalin, because if you do not do this, then stalin will occupy this poland, er, make this gang, er, the moravian people, that is, this polish pickle government is actually a government, and in the end will exert pressure on western allies that roosevelt and then we will probably be forced to recognize them, so you should come to an agreement now or your negotiating position will only worsen it wasn't now prime minister johnson i would say, well, this is an example of how a politician understands what the principles of defense of values ​​are and understands that if ukraine is not defense, we are the basis of international law and