it is financed, but we became interested in whether it has become an institution convenient for an army of officials who simply launder funds through this institution. i don't want our discussion to simply turn into such a way that, well, let's put it roughly, as an ineffective body, let's dissolve the only the only organization, no one dissolves the only organization on the planet, which unites the largest number of countries in the world , because i tentatively imagine that russia is actually russia, too, may be interested in getting it, for example, corrected by the un, and corrected the question is if russia, do we know how russia acts on the territory of the european union? yes, a very large number of european officials who have already resigned are invited to the supervisory boards of russian state enterprises, and they are given millions of salaries there, and because of them, the problem begins to flow a little bit ago. eh natasha, i think that this is a very

correct question for what kind of money exists today uhu come on and uh, how is this money distributed because well, it may turn out that russia makes huge contributions there, it was ready, someone will not be able to do it soon production duty because the economy of russia is not that big and the contribution i don't remember where russia is, but it is not among the five largest payers among them there are other permanent four members of the security council as for payment of secret funds. therefore, no, i would not agree with this, but you know, according to parkinson's law, known to everyone, up to 70% of the funds that are in the budget go precisely to the salaries of un secret staff, it is clear that this is a

lot, well, even more funds and where peacekeepers operations of the un and this is also, by the way, an issue that has recently begun to pay less attention, but we do remember that in the 15th and 16th-17th years there were active discussions about the possibility of involving a peacekeeping role, well, at least in the donbass and i was just then on the spread. we were dealing with this issue, and now i want to say something that some of our allies may not like , but last but not least, we did not manage to carry out the project with fury at the time . of russia because against france were germany, well france as a permanent member of the security conference and germany france germany in the 14th year, i apologize for interrupting you here, it is simply necessary to repeat that since the 14th year, despite the embargo on the supply of weapons from

europe to russia, the largest exporters of defense the equipment and technologies with which the russians modified their tanks, their helicopters, with which today they attack our cities, it is france and germany, which as kiselyov said coincidence i don't think i'm sorry well, you just can't be silent about it absolutely agree with i remember in the 16th and 17th years, when ukraine was a member of the un security council and we simply had much more opportunity and weighed in from the middle to pass this same resolution on the peacekeeping mission in donbas. she wasn't that bad, but i always thought that uh, hmm , well, with all the negatives, she could at least stop the bloodshed at that moment, well, that is, stop this conflict and freeze

it. there are many such female chancellors when you admired her, when she was the northern stream, i lobbied for it, i just lobbied in which of the periods you admired her, then you admired her as a political figure, yes, a world-class political figure, she was such a figure that has forever entered history, but now when we assess these actions and we we see, you correctly mentioned the nord stream-2 project, which, in fact, created an opportunity for russia to think that, first of all, ukraine can be cut off from our gas supply system to europe, and secondly, he showed showed that such a thing is possible at all, i'm just lithuania , so that since the 14th year, a decision was immediately made so that it would be the most painful for him, so we give up energy resources, and in fact, lithuania since the 14th

year, so that only now it is like that well, it coincided, so what is it a large-scale invasion of prayer said that i'm sorry, the russian will create resources. goodbye , the germans are like that. well, we would gladly, of course , turn the valve. we've got another speaker appeared on the line, ah, volodymyr yuriyovych, we will stay in touch with you, uh, we will continue the discussion, but i want to include uh, valentin glykhy, a political scientist, maybe from the political aspect, he will help us understand the in this matter, are there countries in the world that threaten nato countries in some military or political sense, hypothetically so, and let's remember that when the pro system was deployed against missile defense in europe, they clearly said that

in fact we are not deploying it against russian federation, and it was most likely just about north korea, there were also certain fears about iran and its nuclear program. on an aggressive and sometimes destructive position regarding the current, well, if you can say so, the world political or international order. an article was published in time, and it very coolly puts for hours these problems of global security that must be understood, but i agree that it is unlikely that the un and nato in today's world can perform the

functions that the current security situation puts on the agenda, i.e. this there can be no bloc confrontation or any bloc confrontation of military-political blocs means that it can put humanity on the brink of a war, well , a world war with nuclear weapons, accordingly, the destruction of that is the logic of what is necessary to create some quasi-states as guarantors of global security and to delegate to them the right and authority to observe this world order, well, by and large, it is also only at the global level and the very evolution that we once reached at the level of a separate state. yes, when each of us delegated certain powers to the state . that is , we gave up the blood feud of an eye for an eye and transferred this right, for example, to the state to regulate valentine's day, returning to the global issue in the future by collective of security i want to return to the topic that volodymyr yuriyovych raised about the relationship

in general of today's blocs such as nato. yes, there is such a triangle . the un, yes, the un is the united nations, but in fact, in the reformatting of this new world security order, will there not be a conflict between these three structures, because, well, we remember from history that great britain at first, they did not want to join the european union . it is because of their proximity to the united states, and the united states is the main initiator of the creation of the alliance. and the brexit took place, britain left the european union, ah,

won’t a struggle, for example, between the power alliances for dominance on the economic fronts, eh, i don’t think so? well, in the triangle that you called, i would instead of and he put the image there is because we are all talking about er, well, more or less european, let's say structural well, plus the usa and canada, but they are also in nato and they are in europe , er, well, there is no european i think there will be no competition for the union. well, all the more so because both nato and the eu are unable. well, all the more so for the osce to be concerned with, say, conflicts in africa or problems of sustainable development somewhere in southeast asia, and even more so. the climate there is... some financial issues and so on, that is, there is a whole other thing of the nature of the organization in the un system. by the way, they are all

the same world bank and international fund, let's not forget that they are also formally special institutions. it's just that they have already become so autonomous over all these years, and we, uh, well, many experts already believe that who is absolutely independent, yes it is, but de jure they are part of the un system and they created precisely if there were narrow institutions in those days when it was signed because of the forgotten statute and so on, there may be some competition and she means already there is, for example, the problem of demining and which, by the way, will be faced by ukraine , our minister of monastyrskyi has repeatedly hid about this issue, about how many years and money and funds will be needed to demine everything that the russians left after the church and are still leaving behind there are appropriate structures in the

osce and the un, for example, the osce has money, and nato has specialists, so here it is the same as monitoring elections, that is, there is no, yes, there will be you, uh, that is, some kind of balance must be sought he will be found by this competition, it just works to my advantage. it seems to me that even more so, you know, we don't know and we can't know today, well, what will happen, for example, there during the summer and in our country and around it. that is, what this war will end, where will we stand, where will russia be your words, here we have come to a conclusion, and with this at least the present studio definitely does not argue that the issue of reviewing collective security is mature, even

more or less determined delegates to whom it is delegated it is possible to monitor this, but you know, even remembering our administrative reform, which you understand in our country, united into territorial communities, unfortunately, a very logical comparison, as they could not decide for themselves which village would enter where. and what should be the trigger, you yourself understand for a number of countries with their own

because you joined our broadcast, and valentin glamykh is a political scientist and it was interesting to listen to him, but i would like to comment on

valentin's words about what needs to be completed. yes , that era actually reminds me of him, do you remember we had yaroslav hrytsak on the air - a historian, and how aptly he said that war is the norm in the world and peace is an exception and it is very fragile, so these are our dreams that we will definitely defeat russia now and it will not be in there are more wars in the world, well , they are breaking history textbooks, but there are different positions, and your opinion has changed about the fact that we need to join nato. look for a way or look for a new format after we have discussed for such a long time with very interesting speakers. no, we in principle, we actually reached the speakers before joining nato, you need to go straight to nato, you just need to rebuild the nato campaign, but i don't see the possibility of joining any other alliance, it will remind you of how

when an operation is going on in a hospital, the whole hospital needs to be rebuilt or a new hospital will be built when in the hospital an operation is underway, it is necessary to complete this operation in this hospital, and actually i think that we have to complete our path to nato and actually try to change something there from the inside, well, in any sense, i think that these discussions lead to final one opinion that the world order around some security guarantees will change, it will be with the reform of nato, yes, or will it be the creation of some really different alliance , ukraine will participate in this process, and all through the free by the blood by the blood of our citizens of ukraine, yes, simply, well, for what ukraine has the right to, er, stand er in the list of fundamental countries, how many will be reformatted , because after the war, i apologize to such special operations forces that currently exist in ukraine

who have such experience in carrying out such god of actions well , oh, there are no such countries in the world anymore, well , you have to understand that planetary stories, global stories, they are not accepted there in a day, two weeks, a month, and in fact, the point is more or less logical in our discussion today, may, may will be delivered in the summer, in july, when they will gather in madrid for the nato summit earlier . in ukraine, we will find out. and even if we decided on thursday on behalf of a representative part of the country, then ok, our path to nato is at least in the summer , we will find out. and are the doors to where we are moving open for us, because going to a place where

, to put it bluntly, you are in the press b is closed door well, maybe there's no point in going there and that's a fact well, it's not that at least in the summer we will know the position and it will also be clear that if we know the position earlier if, god forbid, they will use weapons of mass destruction but let them take chernobaivka first you know how friends say yes and i think that until this day we right by the time of the start of this nato summit, ukraine ukraine will already win, we have already won and here we are today talking about contractual things like this. question yes when when is the victory about global things we can only talk about thanks to our military thank you to our military thank you for being with us on our broadcast we hope it was interesting yevhen kuksin was in the studio journalists 1+1 stanislav yasynskyi natali ostrovsky, i'm evgenplitsky, see you in the

next broadcasts and we pass the word to our colleagues , we will meet on may 7, the day of lviv, ukraine is inviolable on the 8th and 9th of may, the united news team will organize a special marathon, two wars, one future, together, we are journalists of facts, details of the news and today in the studio from kyiv and tv cities between kyiv and berlin from tsn what is common between the second world war and russia's modern war against ukraine how the so-called great patriotic war became a weapon of russia why a pretended friend became an enemy and unleashed the biggest war with

the times of the second world war and how europe rallied to help ukraine protect common values ​​the free world for ukraine in its brave struggle for self-determination on may 8 and 9 watch the special marathon of unified news two wars one future we remember and win every defender of ukraine has his own unique superpower meet major general viktor nikoliuk is the callsign of the wind, he sees the enemy ’s plans everywhere and like the wind knows no obstacles. bears huge losses, now the wind has the title of hero of ukraine, glory to heroes, glory to ukraine, glory to ukraine

, everyone is talking about supporting our country, ukraine protects from russia and was the first in the world to create a state in a smartphone and today, for the sake of democratic values, for our victory, we united the whole world, a world that knows that ukraine is a country of free people, victory is ours and pasha is important, we created a state, we can do everything and today, for the sake of democratic values ​​and our victory, we have united the whole world, which knows that ukraine is country of free people, victory is behind us, we will transport, we will win, we will win, we will defeat the news together, we are strong, we will intercept, we will win, you are not news

, together, we are strong, accelerated cities of ukraine - this is cozy kherson, the pearl of the protected territories of ukraine, the city played a significant role in the creation of statehood, it became the southern center of the ukrainian revival during the great of terror, nkvdists shot for nationalism almost 2,000 people in the kherson district of the oun, led by bohdan bandera , actively fought against the german invaders because an angry kherson native will go bare-handed against the enemy column , but will not bow down to the occupier kherson unconquered hello, friends, forgive me, they answered me right away, it was good, a little work, i have 4.5.0 determines everything calmly, you remember the noise, now he

will find it, worry, touch, not often, you and your mother keep cool, young, how are you walking while shopping, you learn table multiplication by 5, you choose funny games in the messenger, i see you have good weather there, so sunny, so we will meet soon, i dream of hearing you, i am happy that everything is fine, letters yes and i have 4 5 0 journalists, cameramen, documentarians, photographers, 69 days of war in a whirlwind of events. on the line of

fire, 16 of them did not return from the task, but the duty to continue their work, to tell the truth for which they gave their lives, every defender of ukraine has his own unique superpower. meet major general viktor nikoliuk is the callsign of the wind, he sees the enemy’s plans everywhere, like the wind knows no obstacles, clearly under his skillful command, the cossacks regularly give the russian army, which is suffering huge losses, the wind has the title of hero of ukraine, glory to heroes, glory to ukraine