since then, it seems to me that russian diplomacy as such has ceased to exist, it has turned into the format of a propaganda machine that justifies lies, that is, diplomacy is a specific form of communication between states that is based, first of all, on objectivity - the second is trust, if there is no one and the other, then it simply stops functioning as it is today, russian diplomacy, well, no one in the world believes that today putin, in his post- election meeting, mentioned this again that russian diplomacy proposed to the west to return to the concept of pacifism, non- uniformity of security, and so on. well, everyone

read all this pacifism and all this indivisibility of security within a few hours. how can there be trust in such diplomats? concepts to what they say if the deputy minister of foreign affairs of the russian federation declares to the europeans, let 's go to the borders of 1997, well . i think that now we are talking about russia as an international outcast, as a country with which they do not want and will not communicate, and the fact that you have now shown these footage, when the russian ambassador was covered with blood-colored paint, of course, on the one hand

, there are diplomatic representatives untouchables and it is hardly er too er right from the point of view of er formalities and the protocol of the step but if you see behind it the essence of who this gentleman represents and he represents a bloody aggressive er country that kills children and rapes women who destroy cities which destroys the infrastructure, then from the point of view of human understanding of what is happening, well, apparently, it should be at least taken into account. and tell you more, well, in your former proposals to some managers many years ago, i wrote about the need to reduce the level of representation

of these countries in the russian federation, there should not be ambassadors of civilized countries. what are diplomatic relations? this is a sign that there are normal relations between the two countries . contacts eh normal relations that eh ambassadors should develop, i.e. bearing in mind political contacts bearing in mind economic on some kind of interactions by such pseudo-diplomats as lavrov, what kind of contacts are we talking about when russia is being imposed more and more sanctions each time, that is, under such circumstances, it would be quite normal to have the level of temporary proxies, and maybe even less level in order to show in such a way that

russia is burned down, that russia is a country with which no one wants to do business, and i deal only in that er context in order to somehow solve certain humanitarian problems er well, for example there the evacuation of the civilian population, the withdrawal of or exchange of military personnel, and so on. and so on, no one really focuses on this country, does not want to, and will not, therefore, mr. sergey, russian diplomacy has ended a long time ago, it is no longer there , it is already a bubble it is a propaganda machine which is working to correct everything that this bastard tells to his citizens . well, i remembered lavrov and his scandalous statement to which the ministry of foreign affairs of israel reacted, then vladimir putin congratulated the president of israel

on independence day and seemed to apologize for lavrov , but the fact that putin is apologizing for lavrov obviously indicates that putin is not ready for complete isolation from the world well, if he did not care at all, if there were no prospects for the future for him in his understanding, then why would he suddenly i called israel there and apologized for lavrov, i understand serhii not only that he apologized for lavrov, he also apologized for zakharova, who once made comments about the president of serbia put him in an absolutely stupid situation so that putin is not used to other diplomats , paraphrasing a well-known phrase, he doesn't have those who can say things

that are in diplomacy they are simply not acceptable, and bordering on the fact that they are xenophobia, racism, etc division into better and worse, well, that is, everything that is called in diplomacy well, just a stupid tone well , in principle, this cannot be uh, especially when it is the head of the diplomatic service and it is said publicly, so i think that putin usually has a composition here. and why is he calling to some leaders, well , actually those who are actually uh, two times and there are no well, in the last uh, two months uh, well, i don't know if we can collect on the fingers of one hand those leaders in which he called, some

called he er someone came there but if we again, let's see who it was, or whether it was his vassals and actual technicians over whom he has real influence, or those whom he still wants to somehow use in order to have at least some leverage influence or channels of communication with the rest of the education well, i don't know if he called any civilized leaders in my opinion no eh, without knowing it, leaders of the eh civilized world came to him to actually discuss some eh issues in essence no, that is, it eh -e agony and russian diplomacy, and in these well, russian too

of the state, volodymyr, a few days ago, the head of the main department of military intelligence of the ministry of defense, mr. budanov, stated that there are two options for ending the war between russia and ukraine: the division of russia into three or more parts and the relationship of preserving the territorial integrity of russia in the event of a change in the leadership of the state. which option do you prefer, i prefer the option that russia will never again be a threat to humanity, you know the great statehood of the russian population no matter what, it continues to support putin and his bloody war, the fact is that it is formed subconsciously, this is a mentality - this is something that was

laid a long time ago and something that is constantly repeated, well, you understand, a country from the baltic sea to the pacific ocean. it's great, and if it's great, so are we - great, if we're great , then we'll tell everyone and do what we want , here's a short, so to speak, short formula of what's going on, now you're showing these shots of the victory when the children are... e school a sometimes preschoolers are dressed as gymnasts and made of them, well, it is not known what this is. what forms this endless victory month, but they grow up and will repeat again and again after a few years what we can repeat in order for the country to stop a devil in the literal sense

of the word, it should be limited a little, especially since this is not a homogenous population, it is a population that is separated by tens of thousands of kilometers, which have completely different economic interests, which have different historical memories which have e-e other historical and national by the way, traditions and so on and so on , that is, this country that is now held only by this police force, by the fear of the fact that for uh, every exit even with a single protest with a white sheet on which nothing is even written, you will still be raked, that's why this country has no prospects, in fact, and for its peoples, it would be much better if a few dozen were formed on the post of russian territory, and i don’t think that 2:3 and several

smaller countries that will automatically get rid of this disease, which will have more or less reasonable from the point of view of management in the territory where the population will engage in normal self-development not in the production of missiles and bombs in economic and social development for its own population this is what will once and for all put an end to the issue of russia as a global threat, and it will be better for the russians themselves and for the world, so i think that this path is already objective. if earlier, i and my

colleagues from the russian research center talked about the prospect of the collapse of this country in the coming years 10-15 years, today, taking into account all the circumstances that we are observing, namely, powerful economic sanctions that will definitely continue, the fact that the russian military machine is collapsing, that certain forces are beginning to form around it, which are dissatisfied with it all this will definitely be the policy and we will lead russia to its decline and, in fact, liquidation, the only thing that can save this territory is that these forces around will try to convince the west that it will be better that way because it will not have to solve the issue of nuclear weapons things the event can go because, as always, he wants to

work less and not get stuck in some difficult problems. well, everything will be fine. i think that in the end it will be decided after the war, after the victorious war of ukraine, after russia will dictate the conditions on which it will be i have to agree, otherwise, the option and the collapse will be quite, quite large. well, mr. volodymyr, we somehow draw an analogy with what happened in the soviet union from the mid-80s and ending in 91. we remember what happened in august in 1991, when the junta came to power after supposedly removing mikhail gorbachev and, well , then the west was also afraid of the collapse of the soviet union, because nuclear weapons were in various former or former republics of the soviet union

, and the united states of america was also afraid of the collapse of e- e of the soviet union, although it seems to be on one side of the table, but on the other side it is not clear. during some short period, why i am asking about this now, i will explain now because many people ask when the russian-ukrainian war will end, but i always say in this situation that it can end just as it began, mentioning the experience of this failed putsch when it seemed that the soviet union would now enter such a black line, uh, because there is a coup, there is a junta that will now take power into its own hands, or could it be so in the russian-ukrainian war that some episode or

some event or some fragment of this war will radically change the history and course of this war and lead us to victory, well, mr. sergey, it seems to me that the war itself has already radically changed the course of history, why, well, you mentioned the last years of the soviet union, but then there was no bloody war that exists today in europe, so was the luhansk war before that, yes, there were problems, but they were on the periphery, they did not directly affect the people who lived in this north atlantic space. today, it has become the arena of the fiercest confrontation between democracy and totalitarianism, and as we talked with you earlier, if world democracy has decided that it will finish off this russian

totalitarianism, then this means that the war will definitely end with the victory of democracy, because democracy is stronger than tourism, if i didn't want to this dwarf looks powerful, but his fate and the fate of his country are actually already written and we only now have to think how to correct this scenario that is already in the heads and i think which is already on paper for many in the western capitals, therefore, the war, and the question of when the war will end depends, first of all, on two factors: how quickly we will receive weapons, how powerfully our partners will help us financially, and how effectively these weapons will be used by our heroic armed forces forces, this

is actually a combination of conditions in order to end this war as quickly as possible. what to do with this russia or leave it after all but control its economic, political and military development or give the people who inhabit this country or territory the opportunity to self-determine and start their own history from scratch of the totalitarian sheet, this topic will be important in order to understand where we are going and how quickly we will end this

war. by the way, today, may 9, joe biden has to sign the law on the langlist on providing weapons to ukraine, and it is said that it legal support for democracy in 2020, the second year that radically changes this law in the current war and does this mean that from now on ukraine can count on full military assistance from the united states of america, and it is not limited. -e for the support of democracy because of what is happening today in ukraine this is what the russian aggression was all about - it is actually an attack not only on ukraine, not only on ukrainian

democracy it is an attack on democracy in general and therefore in order to preserve this democracy as a whole and help it win, the americans are taking an unprecedented step, because you remember that there was no other such law since the second world war , and this, in turn, means that ukraine will receive everything it needs for her eh for her eh equipment eh without relative to eh to defend democracy in ukraine and to defend democracy in the world therefore thank god that this law has finally

been adopted, we think that in a few hours it will be signed by president byron and that the powerful help of america will help us defeat the rashists as quickly as possible we talk a lot and have talked with you before about whether certain agreements are possible or whether certain agreements are possible with the russian federation, especially when russia torpedoed and talked to the ukrainian side and talked about the fact that we do not fulfill the city 1 minsk-2 about the fact that we are something there we do not do and do not fulfill certain obligations despite the fact that the russian federation simply started a large agreement signed in 1997 by the then presidents kuchma and yeltsin, but the secretary of the nsdc oleksiy danilov believes that a peace

agreement with russia cannot be possible only the capitulation of the russian federation. do you , as a diplomat, still allow the possibility of signing some kind of agreement with the russian federation in these difficult conditions, and when putin's position is clear, which can also change, but is clear. today's good day, when i understood the balance of forces in the world and when i understood the position of president zelenskyi, who also says that there can be no peace agreement with russia. well , it seems to me the same, uh, that uh, this is uh, and frankly, i'm very glad that such high-ranking leaders as mr. danilov speaks in very clear terms, well, what can be a peace agreement with the country that attacked you, that is, there can be

capitulation either from our side or from that side, somewhere in the middle, we can't come together, well, we can't because it it's just not logical, and no society will accept one and the other. well, i mean in relation to ukrainian society. maybe in russia, after two weeks of the next company of oblation, they will give out a defeat for a great victory, well, that's their problem. for half a step , they will definitely not find any positive feedback among the citizens, so i think that uh, here it is really only about uh, and it is more correct only about the signing of an agreement between uh, a collective measure, of which ukraine and russia are a part, on the termination and the conditions of continued coexistence if it

is really about russia remaining on the political map of the world well, at least for a certain period of time, most likely a short historical period, then there must definitely be an end, but well, it should be only with those conditions that will suit both ukraine and the west, do you remember at the very beginning of the aggression, uh, muscovy gave us a few conditions that it wanted, including even a ban on conducting military exercises there without the consent of the guarantors. where do they go, of course right there wrote down well, in my opinion, after the end of the war, we should also insist that no russian soldier be 200 or even 300 kilometers from the border, that there cannot be any

accumulation of russian troops on the border of ukraine , that russia, but by the way, it is after the start of these sanctions, it will not be able to quickly restore its military-industrial complex. but this can also be considered one of the prerequisites that in the future it will not attack its neighbors, etc. that is, it seems to me already now to our negotiators, if we think about the future, we need to write the conditions of this agreement on a ceasefire or a cessation of war, where we clearly and clearly say that we want to get a collective measure in the end, because if we

continue to pretend that the war is over and thank god, it will resume soon if we do not force russia to do the things we need. so, we need to think and offer ukraine. bring to our western partners their e-e visions of such documents to start discussing them with them so that later this did not come as any kind of surprise for them because we have to formulate the documents as we need them, we do not have the right to sign more budapest memoranda and we definitely will not sign them."

on april 4, the rrt concert illegally turned off the digital air of ukrainian independent tv channels espresso, the fifth and direct, a petition has been registered on the website of the cabinet of ministers of ukraine, which demands that ukrainian tv channels be

returned to the digital air, in order to sign the petition, you must first registering is very simple go to the website petition in you.gov.ua there go to the registration tab and enter all your data, say your phone number and email, confirm all your data, enter the code that will be sent to your mobile, create a password, it will certify that you are not a robot, give consent to the processing of personal data, check all your data once again and click the register button to complete registration , go to your specified email where the website letter will come click on the link in the letter to return you to the petition site, enter your email, password, enter , return to the main page of the petition site, open the petition for the return to the digital air of ukrainian tv channels espresso of the fifth and direct

press the button to sign the petition, the inscription signed will appear your signature is confirmed and taken into account, let's return ukrainian patriotic channels to the digital air together we will not allow freedom of speech to be destroyed in ukraine with you during the war information front of ukraine fm halychyna together to victory, the help of the usa and the west to the soviet union was it had little effect on the results of the war and the ussr coped without the help of the allies, we

still would have won this myth, in fact one of the decisive factors of the victory was the support of the union under the lend-lease program land forest is a us state program, it provided for the supply of weapons, ammunition, military equipment to the allies and of other materials, return unused and not lost materials or pay for them already after the war, the ussr began to receive supplies of polish from the fall of 1941, aid from the allies already played a decisive role in the battle for moscow. by the end of the war, the ussr received almost twice as many cars as part of the lend-lease than it was able to produce. red aces like oleksandr pokryshkin and amet khan sultan flew on american planes. the union received help from the usa in everything from weapons to explosives fuel, steel, and up to food products

, canned meat alone received more than two billion cans of supplies lasted the entire war and continued even after the defeat of germany to support the ussr in the war with japan 24 in june 1945, at the victory parade in moscow, a small amount of equipment was supplied by lend-lease, however, immediately after the end of the second world war, moscow preferred to forget about the help of the west, the contribution of the allies to the victory was diminished in every way, moreover, until the collapse of the ussr . it did not pay off the debts for the supplied equipment in 2022- the united states again approves the land lease program, this time in ukraine. russia, which so diligently created the myth that it managed without land lease and without ukraine, is now fighting without land lease and against