that there won't be a war, he said that it's all ridiculous, no one will attack from belarus and there's nothing zelensky says, let's grill kebabs, i say and everyone says that there will be a war well, i mean western intelligence, you as an intelligence officer, will there be a war on the 16th he told me then that there would be no war on the 16th, but there would be on the first days of the 20th, or the 20th, on the 20th of february. well, on the 24th, the war actually began, as we remember it, on the second day after the day of the soviet army. that's how i was then you don't know. they didn't know who to believe. i still believed in our government and took a planned vacation, went to lviv, and bam, and there was a war. this was the story. well, thank god ukraine stood and stands and holds on. well

, in the meantime, we will show you a picture about the lend- less so that we can understand what joe biding signed, because biden signed the law on land and forest here is what it is, by the way, the president's office has prepared for us such a such a such a cheat sheet of explanation . weapons well, conventionally speaking, we need airplanes and a talisman, airplanes, we need some kind of big missile and take as many of those missiles as you need, and they also determine the terms of its delivery. and we know that the american weapons are fantastic . up to six days, it's really very fast, it's faster than there were 40 there in the second year or when. by the way, in fact, we have already received all

those howitzers, eh 777 eh, cool, cool weapons, brand new , very guns that shoot about three times farther than the moscow ones and well, the soviet ones. and also when they are equipped with special projectiles called scalibor, this is a bolt sword. who remembers king arthur? and these scalburs are extremely accurate. there is a deviation radius of 50 km, they hit is literally allowed 4 m seems to be 24 m, that is, this is fantastically accurate, this is the permissible deviation of the projectile by 50 km, that is, they hit, it is obvious that it is more accurate than most of the russian e-e missiles, which, by the way, today conducted salutes in all the occupied temporary cities of ukraine odesa was just fired at by missiles, north-rocket missiles were hit, the information about the extent of the

destruction is being clarified. there is no information about the victims yet, i hope that no one was hurt by the results of this shelling. volodymyr tsibulko is already with us, mr. volodymyr. good evening to you. you just say good evening, it's good evening, and i congratulate you on the important act signed by joseph biden, because well, i would say, i joked to myself on facebook that despite all that putin is guided by stalin and stalinism, the whole irony fate lies in the fact that the lend visa act was signed by a person named yosyp yes joseph joseph joseph biden that's it for you that's for you and anti-stalin is real that's why

in us now it's just putin he already wants to be hitler it's like that here's us like that here's everything everything everything everything changed and got mixed up in these narratives i wanted to say about what uh in us in us in us in us president zelenskyi spoke today, and we already said that we were not redundant in principle zelenskyi's words that we will not give our 9th of may to anyone, somehow, he expressed it somehow well, the fact is that our 9th of may was a guarantee that ukraine became a founding member of the aga, and we cannot give it away because the status that ensured we will have

independence in the future, it was won with blood in the second world war, see volodymyr. in my opinion , it is a choice for ukrainians, so it is very important to say that ukrainians cannot, well, be born, of course, but for the most part, well, at least for the last 100 years ago, everyone who said i'm ukrainian, everyone before that was not a person who said i'm ukrainian, that is, ukrainian is a very conscious choice and therefore ukrainians can be. that is, it is a political choice first of all, and when we say when we realize it here . there is ivan vasylyovych. my grandfather also fought in this war in the red army. but i cannot say that he fought subjectively as a ukrainian in this war, and therefore i cannot say that it was my grandfather's war exactly as ukrainian and for ukraine i am just very good

i remember those grandfathers of the front-line soldiers who were from the village where i grew up in the kaniv region and they talked about the fact that first hitler came, then stalin came and ukraine, that is, their rejection of hitlerism was projected on rejection of stalinism, veterans who fought in the red army, they thought that they were fighting for ukraine and this is what i remember when one of these grandfathers died and i came to the funeral, they left without graves, it was such late brezhnevism and here they tell me quietly we know what kind of independent you are

ukraine we too you see what we fought for we didn't pledge it, we fought for ukraine that's why it's well this memory is already leaving because putin this memory that he privatized and mercilessly exploits , by the way other people than the memory of other peoples, well, the russians always put their own scheme on any event. have nothing to do with this, have to do with a huge tim more than the ukrainians, well, putin no longer says that the

russian people were the biggest collaborators in the world, the map of the russian liberation army, which exploited i want to remind you of the three colors that are now the official symbols and exploited the st. george's ribbon, which is also a special such tsimmes, so to speak in the model of the propagandistic st. george ribbon, this is exactly the piece of paper that connects it with the tsarist army, well, even stalin invented this order of glory. that is , the same george, only with a star. that is, this is it. everything, well, it's all manipulations and it's well, uh, i want to remind you that stalin, out of fear during the war, allowed george to wear this well, who, who had uh, to wear the order of st. george next to soviet

metals, this is so very well, and i think that just putin's propagandists use this abracadabra ideologically and narratively, they exploit it, but now it is precisely because of putin's aggression that we have a temptation . in such a mass ukrainian consciousness, because for me, for example, the way they evaluated it my relatives, my grandmother, this war, that’s what they said, stalin came first, more precisely, he passed first. hitler attacked, drove out stalin, er, robbed, then came stalin, created a new

famine, and er, that is, ukrainians did not perceive stalin’s stalinist liberation as how ukrainians perceived stalin ’s liberation invasion after 1943, just like hitler's invasion , i.e. the ukrainian consciousness that stalin and hitler were completely equal. as they say, ukrainians remember this parameter very well. i have a very simple analogy, but what analogies are, they are always weak, but they are always very illustrative, so let's just imagine it 's like a nightmare. these two, or did they plant a landing force, entrenched forward, captured kyiv, shocked zelensky, killed him, he heroically

shot back or was taken prisoner. less so, it wasn’t zelensky’s case, in the end, it somehow turned out that way, and then they did so, ukraine has been occupied for 50 years enslaved, they call it victory day, which is officially celebrated there again on the 20th, i don't know , on the fourth of february, further, 60 years later, independence is chosen there, it somehow fell to us from the sky again. also give and he will also be ours well, i'm just trying to say that the ukrainian state came into existence in the 17th year of 1900 . the ukrainian

republic was recognized in the constitution as such, there were diplomatic missions here, and there was a peaceful peace, their only difference from us was that they could not resist. they lasted less than a little more than a year at first, then there was more all the same, less than five years in total and they did not resist and no no and they were not able to transfer a single summer in the future nothing so accordingly so we were not as lucky as the baltic crimea well we just took the whole blow on ourselves and and that's it everything but this and later this tradition was interrupted. i am talking about the fact that, in principle, they were occupiers and are occupiers, and now the important moment is the people who met the german occupation here. that bucha came, conditionally speaking, with repressions, shootings and rapes and looting, and the germans behaved completely differently and

they did not agree as in denmark or in france, especially somewhere in denmark, the tv series was watched yes no they were generally afraid to say a bad word there, everyone wanted to be liked very much. they were just like dandelions. but nevertheless, they did not commit such atrocities here. i am not saying that the germans are better. hitler was better than stalin. i want to say something else, that stalin is no better than hitler and it was the same occupation, which means that we can still consider may 9 a victory as a victory. to instill in the whole society, well, the soviet society in particular, and the ukrainian soviet society, by issuing well, let's say victory, the holiday of the red

army veterans is a national holiday, i want to remind you that not everyone was in the red army, i want to remind you that as a result of stalin's liberation, i understand that they will remember babin yara and terror hitlerites on the territory of ukraine, but if the consequence of stalin's liberation was the famine of 1946, from which more than a million people died, but we must also remember stalin's crimes in 1941 for example, blowing up the dam of the zaporizhzhia hpp cost the ukrainians. and by the way, the red army men down the dnipro river and the prisoners and the ukrainians cost up to thousands of lives. entire villages were destroyed there,

an incredible number of people died, and that's about it. even no one says the same thing, well, wasn't the undermining of khreschatyk a stalinist crime? khreschatyk was already blown up by the nkvd and more ukrainians died there than germans. part of kyiv, it has been preserved, session, how much has been preserved but it was, well, a very beautiful architectural ensemble, of course, it was replaced by such a soviet er, such as soviet vocabulary, but simply liberation cannot contain ror. moreover, the ukrainians were not such collaborators as the russians , there was no ukrainian mass collaboration, as i know from evidence that when here in lviv they emphasized recruitment to the 14th grenadier division, also known

as ss galicia, then there is a huge competition , a huge competition. well, but until the 43rd year about lviv knew about the crimes of babyn yar. lviv had a large jewish population that suffered from the soviet government after 1939. then, ukrainians hid jews from the nazis and told them a story about terrible, terrible terror in greater ukraine and that would be the terrible truth, that is, on the one hand, there was fear of hitler, and on the other hand, after 39-41 years, especially the retreat and execution of the nkvd in lviv, and

there, by the way, the nkvd did not sort out the nationalities of tens of thousands of dead ukrainians, poles, jews, yes yes, yes, and then stalin's propaganda should have started talking about the fact that ukrainians there met hitler with bread and salt, and first of all, in lviv , ukrainians were 12 percent of the total population, and to give it away is stupidity, but memory. well, when we talk about the civil division and about the fact that the ukrainians left well, let's put it this way in the verma, it was primarily fear of the nkvd, before that stalinist terror, and people preferred to die on a polyp than to be tortured by stalin's cats and what was created, by the way, after 40 44 of the nkvd in western ukraine - it's, well, it's terrible. yes, it's terrible. it 's hundreds of thousands of dead deportees.

how many hundreds of thousands ago? well, it's hard to call it liberation. especially since it's hard to call those who were subjected to stalinist terror in western ukraine after 1944. well, i wouldn't. a collaborator named these people, yes, they were definitely prank circles, for some reason stalinist propaganda, well, why am i , uh, well, sometimes i’m released, after all, uh, well , let may 9 be released to those for whom this holiday is meant for front-line soldiers who, well fought in red, because this is actually a holiday of the red army. europe celebrates the day of reconciliation, and we, as part of europe, want to remind you that ukrainians fought in the corps of the polish hay loaders. ugh,

hundreds of ukrainians died under the hay hoe. i want to remind you that ukrainians in canadian contingents in dozens, more than 50,000 fought in american weapons well, i, i, i, let's say, you can't be proud of the fact that, for example, the ukrainians fought on the side of the wehrmacht for a while at least, but i don't see why, but there was a drop of conditions reasons to be ashamed of this well, because there are many, in fact, many european peoples of today fought on hitler's side, a lot, well, the baltic peoples really fought, but what can be said about the ukrainians, first of all, for the ukrainians, the germans were natural allies, they were allies of the ukrainian people's republic, and here there was a pitet here, and there was even respect for the germans , uh, since they in the 14th or 15th year here you threw out, uh, the russians, the russians, the occupiers of brusylov,

who were also brutalized here according to the full program it was the germans who came to the rescue, the account, among other things , is very similar to the current robbery near kiev. well, it was such a shame, but my main thesis is that stalinism and hitlerism are absolutely identical. by the way, andriy, this is a very important thesis because that when putin comes in and says that we overcame nazism, we did not overcome nazism, we resuscitated nazism because the closest twin brother of stalinism was nazism and because i want to remind the famous phrase winsto na churchill who in 46th year, looking at who is stalin finally he he with him so he played well subtly, but

about stalin winston drew and refused that we slaughtered that pig this is his famous phrase we slaughtered the wrong pig that is, after overcoming nazism they suddenly realized that stalinism is even more evil than nazism just oh nazism was a shirt close to the body, it was a direct threat to britain and france, and that's why they were looking for, let's say, with whose hands to finish off hitler, they found it . after the second world war with by the absorption of this central eastern europe by the creation of the block and still being a nuclear nuclear, well , the owner of er nuclear weapons which is still, by the way

, it was nuclear weapons that fixed stalinism as the dominant er well, let's say so, the internal ideology after 1991, why something even partners who they left, well, these quarters of bush did not insist on the de-stalinization of russia, when the partners looked at ukraine, they believed that ukraine, which is de-stalinized itself, is an example for russia, russia, as it is, is more intellectualized for someone it seemed that a more professional, more institutionalized state, russia should become the flagship of such decommunization and desovization, but suddenly the russian leaders realized that the

instability of the sound, this territory would simply crumble into such small pieces, and they again returned to the practice of imperial because under a different model, it was simply possible to have a territory and not a person, and they once again went to the tributary of history with the logic and thinking of the 18th century. it seems to me that when we i i really hope that the result of this war, in particular, for the world will be, in addition to the fact that ukraine will acquire subjectivity, that is, ours, ours, the main thing is clear, but in addition, the world should reconsider in principle, for example, the attitude to marxism as such well, because stalinism, racism, it still relies very heavily on the left ideology and the problem is

that what was written is what is called this opium for intellectuals, that is, what was considered absolutely obscene today, racism, nazism looks like something absolutely obscene and it has a very weak intellectual base, instead there are a lot of these poisonous toxic things spread by russian propaganda, it is very often based on some pretentious intellectual attractive things from their dostoevsky, conditionally speaking with the justification of russian branded nihilism, which poisons in fact very moral foundations, moral subversive of the western world to the e-e in the economy of these ideas of marx, which in fact have already been denied 100 times in practice, but they continue to be very popular environments. i wouldn’t rely on it at all. well, the point is that march is a theoretician, and this is well, such theorizing is certain, but

it is successful because barskikh would not have been a friend of engels, who had several inherited factories , which in in principle, he gave him money, mars was actually a parasite on engels’s funds, although engels was a more progressive person. i want to say that mars and engels still considered russia as such a dead-end branch to europe, and they, by the way, were very critical, they hoped that the crimean the war will finally force the russian empire to lead to some kind of worldview and not only revolution, because these enslaved peoples and angels understood very clearly that russia is just such a big bloodsucker and she just drinks blood from enslaved territories, and this is even for the europe

of that time, even for napoleon it was already clear, napoleon also tried to bring the republic to these territories, but engels and mards, well, let's say they lived in the realities of europe, and it emerged from their teachings european social democracy, which was quite attractive and a popular ideology in europe, and made many countries happy and well-fed. well , but it is actually very far from basic food . literally, as on the stamp, this is the point. what is the analysis, the analysis of that time, of such a barbaric economy, what kind of analyzes did marx make, and allowed

his followers to come up with some more meaningful models, because let's remember, well, that germany itself uh, well, an empire that suddenly uh, started to introduce a pension uh, well, pensions, uh, to find some models of uh, social protection uh, ara at the same time, even when pensions existed in europe, well, there were many such social tools at the same time, the russian empire simply drank and exploited its workers to death, and it was something, although, well, as a matter of fact, it seems to me that the last years of tsarism were the strongest and happiest for the russian empire, but simply this empire itself

was charged as er big bullying machine over a person over a personality, vladimir, well , we literally have to say goodbye, we have a minute left, did you watch vladimir putin’s speech today, image, if i watched briefly, short analysis, text, because i do n’t have much pleasure in looking at this peck, but it’s absolutely eh well, let’s say er, the speech is aimed at separate strata , at separate layers, and er, russian propaganda, such speeches manage to be divided into quotes in order to throw a quote at each social group, er, so i understand how it is done, but i i understand that this is all a set of words that have completely lost their meaning, that is, try to find some

new signals in them. in the last 10 years, putin somehow managed to attract attention to himself with completely meaningless gibberish. well, it seems to me that this current speech is peak gibberish, absolutely empty. this is the speech of a frightened person and despair for a despairing empire, which is simply demoralized by those losses. it seems that they are now frantically looking for some new scraps, but they are not here, and everything is gone, that is, at least the scraps are there with rotation, with democratic institutions , fair elections and the election of new leaders, then society at least has a chance. well, if not a chance, then there is hope for recovery, but before putin. as long as there is this

televised russian psychosis, russia has no chance. we wish for small pieces of this volodymyr tsybulko joined us thank you for the conversation, we talked a little and even about maksym, and i returned to my own discussion of the speech of the frightened and aging the tyrant of putin and the older empire with aging standards. nobody needs us. so, gentlemen, we actually were talking all this while president zelensky wasted no time and recorded his new address, and let's listen to zelensky, ukrainians, ukrainian women, the indomitable people of our country, today we took another very important step and a difficult formal step on our way to the european community