and i think that now there are many legal issues , even in the short-term financial support of ukraine, in particular, the idea of ​​redistributing the domestic currency of the international monetary fund for special borrowing rights has also encountered legislative obstacles, in particular in the eu countries, and it is necessary to do this work in the same way as it is necessary and exactly what you are asking to decide what legislative changes should be made that will allow the seized assets of the russian federation to be used by russian state-owned enterprises of state-owned banks of russian oligarchs in order to compensate for the losses in ukraine, literally yesterday evening, another shopping center was destroyed in odesa, and actually these are the business losses that are also extremely important, it is not only the housing of citizens, we need to talk about the business losses as well and that's why i

think that work is needed here and in fact there should be a very honest policy here, returning to your previous question it should be so honest and open both within ukraine and with our international partners that when we speak properly about this model that ukraine is a heroic state and we must defeat the forces of evil on the territory of ukraine, defeat russia, make it incapable of further attacking ukraine and the entire civilized world, then we understand that the ukrainian economy of ukrainian citizens is paying a very high price for this, and accordingly we have to be aware that uh, if actually we take on uh, such and such, uh, this price will be large and economical from the point of view of welfare, but also our western partners should also introduce an honest policy of not talking about what they have here is the problem with the workload of the oil refinery, which, as the french president says, and the model of the

european union may be too intimate for ukraine, it is necessary to come up with some other model of european integration where a conditional ukraine will not create any political problems, and it is also necessary to solve the legal issues you are talking about that is, either we fight really on our territory losing our lives and losing our assets for the civilized world with the help of real help from this civilized world or then let's not, let's not, let's not go down this ambitious path and let's not consider it realistic. i would like to clarify. maybe you have some kind of vision and in what way, with the help of funds from our external investors, partner-non-investors, of course , donors, yes, international monetary fund or the european union or the united states to make the situation

less dramatic and less traumatic for our population, i.e. people who will find themselves without a job, without actually knowing when they will get it, that is, we understand that that the situation in which the country found itself does not foresee any medium-term forecasting perspective because the war can last for three months or six months or a year or two and so on. eat if people do not have, cannot find work in ukraine, they leave the country in search of work and it is not a fact whether they will return, and we see what a colossal population outflow we already have as a result of direct hostilities, well, this actually means what do we need, we need at this stage short-term budget financing of the budget deficit, which is measured by at least three a, better, up to five billion dollars, in fact,

we have a budget deficit in april, if we do not take into account the grants that were given to us by international partners was under 4 billion dollars. and these calculations , which were about 5 billion dollars per month, are correct, because it really does not take into account full payments to those who lost their jobs, and literally yesterday there was a statement by the prime minister that until the martial law is abolished, and it will obviously not be abolished until the time when the actual war ends and the men are not going to be released from the country, this means that a large proportion of those who, in particular, have wives and children abroad they will not be able to fully support ukraine therefore, there should be enough money in the budget to equalize and ensure the minimum necessary level of well-being for the citizens of ukraine, and this should be money with which

international partners of large volumes and they should go not to some e-e projects in ukraine, but they should actually go to social assistance and help with unemployment at the same time, i would like to remind you that joseph biden signed a lend-lease for ukraine yesterday and in the long run, this means that the economy of the united states the states are more active now, it will probably work more actively in the context of the defense segment, and in the context of the production of weapons, because there is already an understanding that, uh, javelins will be needed a lot more, the stocks that were, they are also not eternal, so we understand that america uh knowingly or not, but he also becomes a beneficiary of this situation with the war, because there is an opportunity to launch segments of his economy on even more

er , the greatest power, certain moments, etc. accents of the world economy, because we understand what a titan i am a titan like the united states, if something changes in their economy, the whole world feels the same way, and in fact, i would not say that they are winning anything now, because, for example, now in the second quarter, where is the fall the economy of the united states of america, first of all, because of record inflation, this record inflation , including the printing of dollars, but now it is being fueled by the food crisis and whether that is why certain manufacturers in the united states and the so-called military-industrial complex can rejoice as much as they can the same businesses in germany, for example, are happy, but this is a drop of mountains in comparison with the entire economy of users, and in fact it is we who can face

a potential global crisis that fits the whole inflation on problems in the economy of china and on the war in ukraine and the inventor in this case i would call the united states america that is the unity of the west there is a new breath in nato but economically now what is happening is actually harming america and europe and even china who can be there politically then he will win economically , he will seize the cheap resources of russia, he is not feeling very well now, gentlemen, i would also like to ask for your advice on the issue of new potential sanctions against the russian federation, so that the world could and should do this in order to fully use this is a sanctions crackdown for russia, because there is a feeling that almost everything has been implemented. vyshlinsky well, i think that in fact we need to add

this issue with oil, because it is the largest source of income for the russian budget, but there are alternative options, there are options that considered with such a kind of tax on the export of russian oil and what would be charged in particular, and then to provide assistance to ukraine, this model was also considered for the export of russian gas, another matter well, that is, how will russia react to this, will they to agree to supply on such conditions, uh, uh, our energy carriers to the countries of the european union in particular, but by and large we now need to close the holes because we understand that i think that serhiy can also comment here, he also signaled that there is a lot, in particular, in the financial sector , despite loud statements of opportunities for russian business, in particular state-owned companies, and

to use all settlement opportunities in the global financial system, respectively mr. fursa please comment on this situation, what else is needed implement and what else can be implemented, this is 90% , in fact, it is already a matter of fact naftogaz e-e and as soon as oil there will also be a banking system, because now while european companies are buying oil while european companies are buying gas , it is impossible to sanction this banking system in russia because of and then it will be impossible and so, as long as europe buys gas, while europe buys us, the banking system will also remain unsanctioned, but it is simply worth understanding that 90% of the sanctions are already up as soon as it is with oil and gas paint, petroleum. i hope it will be in the near future. yes, there will be a limited date in china to buy them, but it is unlikely that we can add them to the moonshiners, so as soon as this is done, it

will be purely technical. on the air of the espresso tv channel, serhiy fursa, an investment banker, and glib vyshlinskyi , the head of the economic strategy center, analyzed the current economic situation both in ukraine and in the world, in particular, it is about the introduction of additional sanctions against russia, we will wait for the final decision, and for the time being, work on the fullness of these sanctions continues. on may 8, i will remind the leaders of the g7 countries that they themselves adopted the final statement, and that the g7 and ukraine are united in this difficult time in their desire to ensure for a democratic and prosperous ukraine in the future, we remain united in our determination so that president putin does not win his war against ukraine, we are obliged to remember all those who fought for freedom in the second world war and continue to fight for it for the people of ukraine, europe and the world community olafshorlz just yesterday

notes that moscow leaves no other options for berlin except to provide weapons to kyiv and this is actually a fundamental shift if we are talking about germany in particular and already today, as antin quoted, there was a kind of joint joint message from olaf scholz and emmanuel macron about the fact that it is still necessary to return to the negotiation process, and this is exactly what they see as the future solution to the example. macrons are calling them and the process continues, we are adding to our information and analytical marathon valery chalovoy diplomat extraordinary and plenipotentiary ambassador of ukraine exambassador until recently ambassador to the united states of ukraine glory to ukraine mr. ambassador radio see on the air of the espresso tv channel accordingly the key question is yes everyone says that putin will not

win this about it was announced at j7 that putin will not win, putin in ukraine is waiting for only dishonor and defeat - said the head of the british ministry of defense and ben wallace, but putin continued with your possible short-term and medium-term forecasts of the current situation. well, let's start with the fact that we have... we all see that there are two processes, one is a war ... league for ukraine, it became absolutely obvious that not only the countries of the west, but also many countries of asia and africa, do you remember this meeting at rammstein, there were their representatives there, to really go all the way and actually strangle russia economically, that is, all of russia's ability to

decades, it is easy to reduce it, but the problem is that the pace of these two processes are different, and it is our task and our diplomacy of our politicians to bring these positions closer together in terms of pace , because i will say that it may look like something, well , to knock it out of the mainstream. but uh, i think that this is not the embassy, ​​it is very different, yes, yes, delaying, this is with packages, this is the same story that was before february 24, when they explained on the fingers who putin is, what is the top, what kind of regime is this, that is, they explained everything but nothing was done , the same approach continues in much the same way. let's be gradual, and maybe we'll stop somewhere. well, it won't be like that, that's why you asked what sanctions could be, and the

sanction should be an immediate boycott of goods and services with russia that is, not to receive anything, not to supply russia, that is, the problem is that when it was during hitler’s time, then somehow no one even thought about it, they did it right away and there was a war simply for access to hitler’s resources. and now, uh, there is no such unity in the whole world has the unity of the country and the european union. there are some countries in asia and africa, but there are other countries that play their own game and want to take the cream out of this, that is, in the form of cheap energy carriers and in the form of the supply of weapons . we have allies among our partners and there are countries with which we still need to work seriously, that is, the problem with sanctions is that they must be introduced at the same time

so that there are no spurs, but this is a very complicated story in our country if the sanctions that concern energy carriers, for example, they are being introduced at the same time, there are such warnings that this can cause, i don't know, sharp jumps in prices for the same energy carriers, and well, it may happen that the world, firstly, plunges into an energy crisis, and secondly, the russian federation by detours can receive even more money than for the already contracted volumes let's say that you said about this matter what i do not understand this logic when the volumes of e-e receipt of russian oil gradually decrease and at the same time, the price has increased and accordingly funds for this military machine remain there, that is, if it is processed in one go and for many goods. well, at least not by 100%, but by 50%, and they would think that they should choose to finance eh,

now there are parades, tanks and everything else or eh- it is possible to keep rebellion in one's country under control for social problems, that is. and now there is no such thing. let's face it. there is still no such thing in russia and they are quietly financing their wars of aggression. that's why i think that despite all the difficulties, this is already the case. stage e-e on oil e-e tents. this is only the beginning. we need to act on gas, that is, because energy weapons are gas, oil is the inflow of resources to the russian budget , so in principle, the problem is that this dependence on russia of the countries of the world , including european ones, was accumulating. well, on the first we have no place here at all. hungary is now and this dependence is

different and planned, it was created for decades and now uh-uh, they are just explaining about their problems , uh- uh. not yet a desire to break with russia, to develop putin, a certain suspicion is muffled, he communicates irregularly , he is talking about the implementation of specific fuses in the european union, for example, orban could hint, well, what, my friend, do you want to trade with the russians, please, i trade with the russians, but here we will reduce the background for you, so to speak to support yours, donate your pants well, but god is with him, as they say, you very rightly noted that revenues to the russian budget are not only poured into bullets, not only skillful bombs and rockets are the background for replenishing the manpower of russian

contract workers because in that collective buryat dagestan russian soldier they pay combat and pay very regularly, they calculated that the price of the monthly campaign reaches somewhere around 900 million under a billion bucks per month - this is, in principle, very significant, but they have no problems somehow overlap, but on the other hand, speaking of more irrelevant matters, putin's speech yesterday was somehow extremely sluggish and colorless, what did he want to say, mr. ambassadors, and why did he not say something specific. let me briefly say a billion no not a month a day billions yes but at the same time but at the same time two months 60 billion and 60 billion is generally a trifle from the point of view of their 350 year for oil and energy carriers regarding the statement well regarding the next one

of this victory on may 9 i made for myself one conclusion is that hmm, something was being prepared from different sources, but they came out with what came out, it looked pathetic in the eyes of the russians because the price is now a rocket. they are flying around odesa, there are still old soviet stocks there, and russia wanted to see this construction in all the beauty, and here look no to you of all the equipment no, aviation was canceled for you, no normal politicians of the future, all of brezhnev’s, i’m not like that, i’m not a coastal one. exclusive of the era there, but just because of their age

. it was important to hear this, attempts to build up, and such a formula was already invented, uh, russia hit uh, uh, it's written on us, it 's an advance on greece, well, that's the first thing , there's no such clear one anywhere, he commented. in this way, i tried analogues pick up what it is. how can it be explained? well, it is explained roughly like this: you are sitting there in the transport, the conductor is coming towards you. yes, so you can check the ticket, it means you need it, right, you need it right away with a knife so that he does not ask for the ticket or the policeman, do you have rights? i want to ask no, kill him right away so that there are not even any questions, that is, it is such an absurdity that it seems absolutely to us, but it is absolutely consciously the position of the politician of the gangster grandfathers of geopolitics

, that is, we disregard any rules by laws, everything is possible for us, we are like that, so that means the format and the tone of the parade that was in moscow, that was in moscow, this is evidence of the fact that vladimir putin does not know what to do next, because the president of the united states, jose- joe biden, for example, expresses concern that putin will not be able to find a way out of the war with the russian federation in ukraine, and to be honest, well, you have to be completely infantile not to think, let's say so, about what could happen next, and even the most predatory beast , cornered, will say no even more from in view of this, the lend-lease was signed yesterday evening, well , that is, the rate increase is still happening. i believe that the approach, if we did not want it,

is that way, gradual, as we see what our partners are doing, they want to go like this gradually, step by step, do not provoke er world war but for ukrainians it is not suitable because for us well, i will tell you this may be a cynical thing but er it doesn't matter what type of weapons are used to destroy our citizens if they destroy mariupol at the level of using weapons of mass destruction for consequences well, yes. for us, this is already absolutely on the issue that worries other countries of the world, so uh, i consider this another mistake that compromises can be found. at this stage, these compromises cannot be found. the rubicon has been passed, there is no chance , we have to go uh as soon as possible without delaying this process, because any delay can

have many consequences. well, if the countries of the world and china are worried about the economy now, although it has its benefit from cheap energy sources and from other political factors, there are questions the supply of grains, the blocking of ports, that is, the un is talking about hunger in african countries. well, do something, make a convoy for ships, make control in the black sea, i am generally surprised why. until now, it’s just me. to be honest, it really annoys me, that is, because all the rights to establish freedom shipping in the black sea the whole world has the whole world has no steps taken absolutely everything is calculated now ukraine which with the help of additional terms from some weapons and equipment that are still in progress she herself do it of course we let's do it, but where is your responsibility for such things, that's why i believe that it's wrong again to

look into the eyes of putin, who is already so weak in relation to the hunted beast, well , people on the hunt know perfectly well what happens in such a case, how to ensure myself from the driven report yes, mr. ambassador, we agree with you, but on the other hand, we understand that the beast may be driven, but it is not so driven , and this war, if it is not treated, but it bleeds ukraine first of all, that is, we understand the collective action helps us, but at the moment no one has any parameter for predicting the medium-term perspective, well, the impression is that it is happening in the west, there in brussels or washington, that it is more or less normal. that this whole thing is going on and there is no way to localize it. i say maybe not very diplomatic things yes, but we understand that our fighters and our civilians die first, and we would

count on some more adequate help, in particular, you very rightly noted the possibility , so to speak, of its convoys and, accordingly, the restoration the work of our ports, yes, well, no one can forbid civilian ships to enter the ports of odessa, because they will sink british merchant ships. well, if they sink them, well, then maybe the british prime minister will take some additional measures, i agree with you. i'm not even talking about the ship's flag which is going to port er-e grain and about its possible er-e escort in neutral waters , that is, it is clear that it is risky, it is clear that it can be problematic, but the situation is no different now from when you remember the british ship demonstratively passed under the crimea

the peninsula, that is, nothing has changed and the black sea countries, it doesn’t matter if they are nato there, they don’t have too much, they don’t have fleets, they have a fleet. and this is only a political position, and it can really be explained by the desire to avoid a direct collision there. for us, the situation will not be in the best direction , because you understand, it is also important to achieve victory, in our case, to defend our territorial integrity and further make such an attempt at aggression impossible, this is our victory, and what will happen in the world in the future world further. we do not understand because with such approaches, when the un cannot make any reaction to aggression, although everything is written in the statute, when

nato ships were specially withdrawn from the black sea on the eve of the war, you remember they were on duty all the time there, one or another was on duty there all the time and what did they get on the eve of the war, when it was clear that there was going to be a war, they took everything out and i absolutely do not like this position because it is impossible, as everyone says, to prevent putin's victory by counting only on ukraine in live force, ukraine on the front line. that is, i think this is an unfair position, and if we want to save er people and at the same time er countries, our partners say that we understand your role. now we are protecting only ukrainian territory, then in general we should close the topic there is what to deliver now , the planes of the anti-missile defense system must go, all the

taboos have been removed, at least in this there must be absolutely decisive actions. i want to see the f16 not in training in ukraine, a fighter, but in our e-e armed forces. i want to see the systems, but peter, but less there systems as soon as possible so that they can't shoot missiles from the 60s in odessa. i want to see these steps, not words that we will gradually strangle putin there. no, gradually does not suit us. it is necessary to de-occupy the territory as soon as possible. but military analysts note that if the situation develops at least as it is now, and our defenders find themselves in the hands of even more modern and effective weapons, liz or any other help, then it will not matter will take place and we will strengthen the russian federation in

any of the formats, but i also note that this is possible provided that russia does not receive some kind of military or economic reinforcement, it is not so important from the countries of the east, for example, yes, in particular, very briefly china, which yesterday, for example, with shorts, noted that it is important not to allow an escalation to the point of no return, and india, whose position is not completely clear to me personally. although ursula ursula of sumatra traveled to india in order to somehow agree on some positions, what about this the factor in this war is what i said that not all countries and china, india are important countries here, brazil is an influence, we need to work with them, obviously we do not have ambassadors to china, so far i do not know for what reasons the proposal of the ministry of foreign affairs of the administration is not accepted do we need to work in all

ways in the president's office now, it's working - they say it's going. but i really think that it needs to be strengthened many times with those countries that you called the first worm chinese. thank you, mr. ambassador valery chaly diplomat extraordinary and plenipotentiary ambassador of ukraine until recently ambassador of ukraine to the united states worked live on the tv channel stb thank you for your work today, we will have spice and atr bera bera wait and now anna eva melnyk and the news thank you khrystyna in kharkiv region continue to reveal the atrocities of the russian nazis for example, in izyum , 44 bodies of civilians were found, and not only for a few artists