no, we don’t sing it now, unfortunately. well, let’s also talk now, but since you can’t do any re-registration on any er, and since in any case, either the financial monitoring of the country where the offshore is located, or then some journalists will sell this offspring we have one more piece of information, i tell you to follow me today, so after a few years of the law in this case, where there is an opportunity, if uh, in the place of the russians who follow their property in ukraine, i was not particularly optimistic here. i think that it is a matter of time only because of how long the main question, and by the way, about the launch or restoration, so to speak, of some processes from the inside is our country's head of the financial committee of the verkhovna rada, danylo hetman , noted that he would have already resumed inspections for businesses that were not affected by the war, and i remember that

in we have somewhat liberalized the conditions, in particular for business during the wartime period, this is such a generally accepted worldwide practice in order for the economy to continue to work. nevertheless, it has its own side effects we understand that the filling of the state budget must also be implemented in a certain way, and here, mr. zheleznyak, the question is for you, what is your opinion on this matter, is it really worth returning control and perhaps somehow changing the taxation of those businesses that are not were injured during hostilities well, let's be frank, you refer to an interview edik armor there uh-uh, it's quite a broken uh-uh phrase if we're talking about vat return, what about our own business, we have to talk here, these camera checks for mts, well otherwise it is it just won't work, then we leave the business writing. and

this is what the business is asking for, and what we did yesterday meets that requirement, and there is nothing wrong with that. now the legislation will not change for a very long time, it will be the next , what if the business cannot pay even i'm not talking only about the military zone, the speech station in lviv, which was hit by a rocket, well, well, they ca n't pay, it's not a combat zone where the russian troops were with their boots, but it's a combat zone that a rocket flew there or a conditional now i am in the committee, this is kyivska street, this is the government quarter, it is blocked off, and because of this, there are many small restaurants that are located here in the portal. they do not work, you simply cannot pass here as a consumer. yes, these services. of course, not everyone has to pay for them, and we have now given the cabinet of ministers and entrepreneurs an opportunity in any part of ukraine. if you have such

documents, any of them confirm the shevchenkas, don't cry, you will pay when the war ends or when half of the entrepreneurs want to. by the way, by the way they pay even with such restrictions. i think it is fair conditionally if you are a cafe in chernivtsi where the number of people has increased and you were open, you had no restrictions there and that hindered you. well, it would probably be right for you to help the state and pay the same taxes even less than 2 % not interest 2%, which were if you are a coffee shop in buch, of course you have completely different conditions there, there is no point in charging you taxes there. thank you for surviving as a business and wanting to open, this is a very necessary moment, but we we understand what is, for example it's the same coffee shop in zhytomyr as well as here. there are specifics here, because this one is not chernivtsi, and at the same time, this one is not bucha. i wanted

you . if you are in zhytomyr and conditionally you have some restrictions, well, once again, it's not even the military. yes, the report is directly related. here's a new example of a closed quarter. there are also many examples of heavy duty near military facilities. you just have documents and everything doesn't pay. and no one passes to you on any checks and so on, but if you need to return mts or close your company, well, it's just legal, you need to do this formal check and of course well, in this case, it's very stupid on the part of the state to see it, that's why there won't be any such draconian strengthening here, we'll do the opposite we are trying to control so that, god willing, some inspection bodies will start their own independent ones and in order to supplement thank you, mr. yaroslav yaroslav zheleznyak, the people's deputy of ukraine has no

less important matters to deal with now. oleksiyem movchyna well, according to the information that was circulated, timofy milovanov will become the main commissioner, the commissioner manager of the funds that will be confiscated in russia and ukraine, so to speak, by oleksiy and, excuse me, it’s possible that i heard about this information, so timofiy long ago yes , he had the idea and various projects on e-e creation of an asset management company, this concerned initially the state assets of ukrainians. yes, in peacetime, that is, the separation of e-e from e-e state management of key

companies and their transformation into profits, yes , that is, a kind of background of national wealth, this is one of these projects. yes, now i understand why timofey can lead the body for managing assets seized in the russian federation, because firstly, he has relevant experience, secondly it can become part of the ukrainian national wealth fund, because among those assets that we currently own are russians, including in ukraine or abroad, and we expect that when our foreign partners and aa confiscate these assets, they will transfer them to management in ukraine or there will either be sold and the funds will be given to ukraine for the recovery of er, yes, this can

become a big, significant, if not the basis for the recovery of the economic ukraine, and well, you can take the cabinet of ministers, so to speak, to instruct them to develop a strategy and not to play around with some there are some such strange stories, well, there are actually a lot of questions, well, but not the only milovanov and not the only such fund. call for the removal from participation in national telethons of one or another marathoners who call themselves national presenters who have played along with the enemy and spread kremlin propaganda for many years, and in this petition the specific names of martirosyan natasha golovanov, vlaschenko goncharova and nazar long, volodymyr polueva, anna stepanets and anastasia daugule, yak do you

think it will be possible to somehow rethink this and similar approach at the legislative level? well, because the main defense is that those people were in one or another the method is related to the spread of kremlin narratives or russian narratives, in particular. yes, when they also worked on tv channels that belonged to medvedchuk. see, this is actually a difficult question , because i am personally in favor of the development of freedom of speech and journalism in ukraine, and when there is competition in this field that is, there are many, many participants in this market. yes, then freedom of speech will be stronger. this is the first thesis . will bring er-er will not bring every result, we should

concentrate first of all on er there citizens of the russian federation yes and which er which worked against ukraine and continue to work or their agents well there are conditionally separate political parties yes which or there political action which is open they called for the destruction of ukraine or worked out the kremlin regulations, journalists maybe this is not a category because they could not they are not responsible as politicians they are not politicians i am in favor of quoting now article 17 of the constitution of ukraine, where it is stated that the protection of the sovereignty and territorial integrity of ukraine, ensuring its economic and information security are the most important functions of the state, the business of the entire ukrainian people

. and in the realm of the media market in general. it is certainly worth noting that the latest events are related to our channel. well, if the market is sorry , then you are already. let's access it to everyone in that case look let's go, let's do it, we have a national council that regulates radio broadcasting and television. personally, as a people 's deputy for three years, i witnessed loud scandals several times, and when one or another channel said that they were pressuring us they don't give us the opportunity to perform there, or one of their tv presenters said something. well, not like that, yes, that means the channel is responsible and it's completely fair, yes, because we have to act within the law, that's what it means, sometimes the presenter knows no, no

no, no, they did this for a year, that is, they did not have this uh, not hatred or division or whatever, yes, uh, it means communication, i appear in the ukrainian space, well, what do you think this is the responsibility of the uh, tv channel 100% , that is, it is fines, it is possible to be disconnected from any sanctions that the state can impose and many other things we can apply, but let's be honest about our channels, er, 99% of them are not independent, yes , they belong to someone, they are er often their editorial policy is influenced by tom we have such a media. as we have it, but we don’t have anything else . we have to do everything to make it better. we have to create hunts that are convenient

for journalists, for the state against ukrainian citizens, to finance the media so that they are not financed by some specific interested party. i don't know, to put it conventionally, an oligarch. thank you for this comment. you, as a people's deputy, had to ask this question . oleksia. transparently, and you had a relationship, in particular, with the work of this system, which gave more, honestly , justice, let's be frank in the management of state finances, and now we understand that in the conditions of martial law, we must work according to the old rules, let's say that peacetime e is not working for us, what is the system doing transparently now, is it even active in our country now, why is it asking, because in the future, we will need to purchase a lot of things for the state,

not only at the expense of the state, but also at the expense of e-e partners who are currently helping us will be here transparently relevant means transparent management of state funds. it is always relevant. it is generally the creation of a transparent system of public procurement. it was a condition of the imf, at one time, for the allocation of funds, and this is correct. that is , we are all used to what you bought for how much? yes , we go into the system and see how how did our village council spend our taxes with you, the conditions , during the war, the system is voluntary, why , that is, the relevant normative legal acts were adopted, where they provided options for state customers yes, well, you can’t help but

use the e-e system, sometimes it’s convenient because you have, well, for example, in kharkiv, yes, or there , we’ll take a small town there, there aren’t a lot of suppliers very often, and who then please so now we gave her gave it is possible to use it voluntarily, but when the war is over, of course, we will return to all transparent procedures, and in the management of e-e over funds supporting the restoration of ukraine, the procedure should be even tougher and even more repulsive. thank you, thank you, oleksiy movchan, people's deputy of ukraine, the co-author of the law on the basic principles of forced seizure in ukraine of objects of property rights of the russian federation and its residents, worked on the live air of the information and analytical marathon of the

espresso tv channel, stay with us. studios of the espresso tv channel so , extremely unpleasant information has arrived that the stakin-tucky republican deputy in the united states has actually frozen for at least another week we understand the lend-lease implementation procedure in such a way that the situation in the world is generally pro-ukrainian, but we are constantly faced with one or the other, i will not blame it on the united states, but with some sad realities, i do not know germany or france and so on, president pakron threw in a kind of proposal to create some kind of alternative association, some kind of alternative version of the european union for the membership of ukraine , that is, already somehow here they are trying to wave us a little, so to speak, but what do you say? i will say in one phrase, quoting a well-known

political figure of the 20th century, known to everyone. i think he is such a historical figure in the whole world . he didn't say much, but once he said such a phrase, which i think is very appropriate for this case . he said that democracy is the worst way of governing. by the state, if we do not take into account that all other methods are even worse, such as the united states of america, where the senate has its own bureaucratic democratic procedures, and france, which has been one of the traditional democrats for almost 200 years years, and germany, which has less years as a democratic state. however, it has learned

the lessons of history. these are all democratic states, and democracy is always the search for a solution that will suit the majority. this is a key principle. so if such a procedure is written in the senate, then... it 's not our way how to get around and how to make it so that this procedure was carried out in such a way, but the correct decision was still approval well, what are you going to do here, we consciously chose a democratic path of development 30 years ago and we fight for we look at him as our partners, our allies who have taken place this word are trying to help us, taking into account the democratic procedures that exist in them, and we wish them only creativity in the correct use of these democratic processes, so to speak, the implementation of everything

we need, because democracy is procedures, and if there is no political will, these procedures can be started on manivka, respectively. do you believe that such an idea can be seriously considered as the creation of something special there? i don’t know there a status that would be equal to membership of the european union, but it would not be one. it seems to me that in these statements that have been heard recently, different, you mentioned the french statement, for example, there is a lot of politics now, politics and uh, they are not so important today from the point of view of the general issue, which today is all civilized humanity decides and this is the stopping of the crimes of the moscow regime, this is the

main task of all the rest, will the eu and ukraine be in the eu, will nato and ukraine be in nato, they are extremely important, but they are secondary. in this regard, and therefore, i would not pay such special attention to these statements, but would pay more attention to those statements that in one way or another answer the main question today, how with the least losses and most purposefully to push the anti-human regime that today actually unleashed the third the world war and ukraine at the peak of this war is about the bloodletting of putin's regime, this is the main issue, all other issues will come later well, of course, we can not ask mr. igor about the story that is unfolding the northern borders of the russian federation, in particular , we are talking about the nato membership prospects of finland

and sweden, and until the finns join nato, the procedure for them will obviously be a little faster and less bureaucratic than, for example, for other countries wishing to join, but it takes less time at this time, great britain supposedly has to provide some guarantees of assistance, at least in case the russian federation takes advantage of this lull-pause between non-alignment and participation in nato , in your opinion, the prospects of opening for the russian federation federations of the second front, can we see that the statement of the ministry of foreign affairs of the russian federation is quite loud, and that they will counter and prepare and take carte blanche for supporting and maybe even offensive actions in that direction, you know, i can be a little harsh now and i will answer diplomatically, but eh- in my opinion, the only thing

left now in the state tour that still calls itself the russian federation is an opportunity, learning conditions, and for now the whole world at least listens to this last turn thanks to the fact that it still occupies the place of the soviet union in the council security of the organization of the united nations, that is, the voice and the second - it is again a derivative of the first that it is a member of the club of nuclear states very often these two positions, especially recently in moscow narratives, they just explode like that well, a horror story that uh, i remember very well i'm sorry . i know this question because i've been doing it since the 90s. it's too much, it

means a horror story for the whole world. they had too much . and here's finland. it's just that i personally really liked this algorithm of work. micro-finland nato. wait a minute, what is the name of the same person from finland who studied together at the university when the active phase of the war began, expressing support and asking what to do, what to do ? from the end and they are writing. well, we will probably do so and we are writing . all the prime minister, what is the point of these idiotic geopolitical games that moscow started playing , probably starting in 2007, in the 8th year, in recent years, it is simply not one of them going out to finland is not

the call is already a serious call because of all these geopolitical games that we play in moscow, how much money was spent on finnishing this finland ? i remember from the history of the course of soviet foreign policy, er, such a mantra as the line of the apiary to the wicket, give it to pacify and don't let god forbid that no one should go anywhere and now, with its aggressive policy, moscow is actually turning over all those pages that were written with such great effort after the second world war in the field of international security, so i just want congratulate and they can't attack finland well, we'll understand, it's not a matter of diplomacy, they can't attack finland, what are you talking about?

it seems to me that i'm a small military expert, but from what i understand now from reports from our general staff and reading specialists of this field of physical capabilities in order for some, well, i don't know the threat there, they invented something there, some term military-technical in my opinion yes yes yes symmetrical military-technical answer this is how they have formulated it for several times that for any symmetrical answer, the block above and individual countries have five times more symmetrical ones. well, this is a play on words, and this voice is a threat to us in moscow's information war, it sounds more and more. i absolutely did not exaggerate this flow of

words that are coming out of moscow today, and it seems to me that not only the northern countries of finland and sweden have understood this , more and more people around the world understand this and it means listening the brain becomes, well, more expensive. no, they are just in any in an incomprehensible situation, they start the old fiddle about nuclear weapons. yes, we understand that this is, so to speak, the last chance. this is no longer diplomacy. this is an attempt to blackmail. blackmail does not work. great britain said that they have a concrete answer to the russian nuclear threat. yes, and as far as we understand that great britain may not even consult with someone in particular if it is necessary to give

an appropriate answer. the use of weapons of mass destruction, great britain reserves the right, without consulting other nato countries, to allegedly answer, i listened to johnson's entire speech at the munich security conference, and i am not sure that he formulated the opinion exactly in the way that it was perceived in we are here in ukraine and yesterday , by the way, we took the inclusion from finland directly to this thesis, so mr. igor, can great britain independently decide to respond to russia? hetman, that is, the rules of behavior of members of the nuclear club, they are regulated by very serious

international documents, as well as written rules and unwritten rules. well, as a rule, the club is established like this. the english know better than anyone in the world what law is, so i understood what you mean you say when you say that you listened to the whole thing carefully, boris johnson will warm up, he knows perfectly well the rules of the club that exist in the club of a nuclear state, this is one of the written rules, in addition to the fact that i wrote a lot, a lot pysanok and uh according to these written rules uh um even written rules a public threat to use nuclear weapons is no longer comilfo, so you understand, but an unwritten rule in the nuclear club is to address the topic of the use of nuclear weapons at all well, let's say so in a decent company

they don't do that, we understand, but the patient also didn't sign up to behave decently after all those war crimes after buchi was cut out after irpen was cut out. years, you worked as an extraordinary plenipotentiary on the word of ukraine in great britain. in your opinion, great britain seriously, not in words, not at the level of declarations of one or another sun, but seriously took up the russian issue, because we remember that they drove nicholas the first of the russian tsar into the coffin of their own the defeat in the crimean war, yes, one of the flagships of which was great britain, my personal opinion, taking into account my experience working with the british in

london, their mentality, their history, their attitude and public speech is very short, yes they took it seriously and that is why they have such support behind their backs as the support of britain reinforced by the support of the united states of america, this is a one-way road from a strategic point of view, now the only question is when and how will this road end so that here i personally have no doubts about this topic does not exist. thank you, mr. igor, for this analysis and for your thoughts that were heard on the air . issues of the transnistrian settlement in 2010, and this will be our next topic for the next conversation with mr. kharchenko antinoburkovskyi. thank you

very much for your attention, work, work, work. yes, the information and analytical marathon on the air of the espresso tv channel will continue in other formats, but we are working for you with non -stop dear tv viewers , now is the time for the news, which will be presented by anna eva melnyk as a colleague. i congratulate you once again. what has happened in the country and in the world in the last hour, until we saw you, and we worked in the sweat of our brows, of course. until you i was not seen. the whole espresso news team was working and i will start with the situation in mykolaiv. there were several explosions. details in a few moments. several explosions occurred in mykolaiv. a column of black smoke rose over the city. so far , residents of mykolaiv are writing about it on social networks.