from donbass and kherson because this is the territory that putin annexed, it is not just an occupied annexed territory that is mentioned in the constitution of the russian federation, does this mean that the ukrainian attempt to liberate crimea will be perceived by russia as such an existential threat that opens the possibility for putin to use nuclear weapons against ukraine? good question, especially since we see that western politicians believe that ukraine should regain control over its entire territory, including crimea, let me remind you that they talked about this the minister of foreign affairs of the united kingdom, when she was defining the goals of western policy in relation to the war that was bought, did not start against ukraine, and they said that in fact there should be a full understanding that russia lost this war, that there was no victory for russia in this war. what is this? everyone should understand, including the russians. well, there is. by

the way, the position of french president emmanuel macron, who said that in any case, when settling this situation, you should not humiliate russia. so, i want to ask. and where is the occupation of crimea? - is this already a humiliation of russia or not? and one more important question. well, well, we will tell western politicians and such ukrainian politicians come to the conclusion that it is necessary to liberate all ukrainian territories that are not considered part of russia, because in the event that the ukrainian army goes to war for the territories that putin considers to be russian, this leads to an excessive escalation of the conflict, but if tomorrow putin includes the donetsk luhansk region and the kherson region and then zaporizhzhia as part of russia, then this also means that these territories cannot be liberated because russia has declared them its own. well, then we are in such a difficult situation. i would say that the situation

is because russia can declare everything it wants to be its own, all this territory where russian troops are located today, donetsk oblast tomorrow, south ossetia after tomorrow transnistria, this means the end, and this means that the rights of force are just actions, because russia uses as force not only its armed forces, but also its constitution, which it simply turns into a moment of political and force of pressure on partners and that it declares as its own on the territories all the territories it wants and this is exactly by the way, such an analogy with the second world war why could the second world war not start because it was absolutely unclear where the red line through which must be crossed, let's say germany is going, and the red line that other countries of the world must accept from the point of view of the will of hitler

annexed some territories to the reich, as it was during the anschluss of austria or during the capture of the czechoslovak sudetenland, but annexed to the reich or in agreement with the population of many austria or in the treatment of international partners as in the case of czechoslovakia, then he began to experiment with other territories, which he occupied , declaring one territory independent states, such as 100 slovak independent states or independent states of croatia, and another territory, declaring them protectorates, such as the autobohemian moravia and the other, whether the territory was included in the reich after stalin and hitler attacked poland in 1939, hitler included part of the territory of poland there part of the reich was declared by the governor-general to be part of the same things that happened during

the occupation of yugoslavia, the independent state of croatia appeared, and some territories were occupied, some territories were given to italy as allies by hitler. some territories were included in the reich itself, and this created complete legal chaos things for the aggressor himself and for the country that resisted, and from this legal chaos there was only one single way out: the destruction of the aggressor himself and the creation of a new order. of independent states that appeared under the auspices of germany solve the very problem of certain territorial conflicts in europe or the desire of certain peoples there to live in

independent states, well, in many cases. there, hitler simply took advantage of the sentiments of national movements in these states to give them independence, but under with their patronages under their ideology, but in any case it all led to the obvious understanding that there is no political solution because so many traps are being created that any attempt to politically solve the situation rests on the fact that the right of force is triumphing again, that's how we talk about this conflict with er russia, which is currently experiencing the whole world practically from russia, let's say let's imagine that at some stage real negotiations begin because serious changes took place in the theater of hostilities not on the benefit

of russia and the russians are ready for the end of the war and even for the withdrawal of their troops from the territory of ukraine, only crimea on the territory of ukraine does not believe that it will be aggression against them, that is a good question, what will it look like in such a situation situation well, many such questions can be asked, and i have to say that it seems to me that putin deliberately creates all these traps so that even if he ceases to be the president of the russian federation, these traps will continue to exist and be undermined, in fact , he is creating the same legal system that stalin created for the soviet union, stalin i understood exactly how he draws the borders of the ally of the republics. where is he going, what is he doing, what is he there, and not the clave of some republics in other republics, fortunately this did not happen in ukraine, but there in the caucasus it was in in central asia, he knew that as soon as the idea of ​​destroying his empire appeared, these mines would start exploding. they started exploding, and putin was going to be gone in this way, but this minefield he leaves us a political minefield that can

explode even in the case of his political absence is also one very important point that needs to be understood from your question so far the draft law on lend-lease of ukraine was first presented in the congress on january 19, 2022 and in addition, we understand that with the time of writing such drafting bills takes more than one day, but at the beginning of the war, a message was broadcast to our society that the united states and its partners were not quite ready for decisive steps. was determined even before the start of the war and in general please comment on this situation well, i want to remind you and that it is no secret that many were not sure that ukraine was holding on

in the case of a massive russian attack for more than 72 hours, because there are several days, maybe a week, and this is no secret. our western partners did not hide this, if the lend-lease law was passed in a situation when a large part of the ukrainian territory was occupied by the enemy and the government would be located either somewhere in the western lands of ukraine or in exile, which also had to happen, as you understand. then this law could not have been adopted, or the weapons that were supplied to ukraine could have been used, say, for partisan warfare this is the same question in the assortment of weapons, not genes, because it was also proven to them that russia will not benefit from an attack from ukraine, that this attack is actually not inevitable, that vladimir putin does not go to any real negotiations with the civilized world, and does not consider this at all negotiations as some kind of key to solving the issue because he wants to

occupy ukrainian territory and join it to the russian federation, it was obvious by looking at it, it was not obvious since 22 to supply weapons to ukraine if there was such a need. this is how the draft law looks like, of course, and everything is like that. i think that there is no need to exaggerate here and to lay some kind of conspiracy in the fact that the direction of the policy was determined before the start of the war, the direction of the policy regarding afghanistan was also determined how the taliban captured it, but when it turned out that the government army of afghanistan is not capable of creating decisive resistance to the taliban, and parts of this government army are even ready to lay down their arms and join the taliban, and the president of the country of ghana left kabul, so what? and what of this, how can weapons help if people are not ready to resist? it ’s simple, but the procedure for supplying weapons to afghanistan

also existed, all this existed, vitaliyu good day, iryna koteleva writes, i think russia is really wary of the presence of nato near its borders or these are their statements, it’s just hello that they allow ukraine to join the alliance, because if these reservations are real, how come they didn’t calculate the possible entry in finland to add well, first of all, they didn’t calculate a lot, i think that in the imagination of the russians of analysts, the idea that finland would join nato did not exist at all; secondly, it does not matter, because norway is a member of nato and that it was a member of nato during the time when the soviet union existed, they also had a common border with the soviet union, and no one died from this turkey is a member of nato - it is a black sea country, as you also understand. well, there has never been any great tragedy for the russians in this regard. latvia, lithuania, estonia, when they joined nato, of course, russia spoke there with statements that it reduces security, but there was no tragedy.

i think that in russia, in principle, they use the very idea of ​​ukraine joining nato as an excuse for ukraine to attack ukraine, but i want you to understand a simple formula that has existed in russian political life since 1991 , from the moment it was formed the commonwealth of independent states is not putin's form, it is a formula that is divided by the russian state, the russian people and russian society, it is a mathematical point of the countries that were formed during the soviet union after the schedule, that is, these 11 republics the baltic countries are not yet counted because they were recognized as occupied by the state council of the

soviet union and they joined the nato of the european union, their conquest can be critically risky for russia, these 11 republics are temporary state formations, in fact, this is the territory of historical russia, the second moment of the return of these territories must take place at the moment when it will be beneficial for russia from a political and economic point of view and there is no impact on the economic and political stability of russia itself, well, relatively speaking if tajiks and uzbeks come to russia as guest workers, so let them continue to come, because uniting with them into one state creates economic problems, they will have to pay as much as the russians, and they should be our slaves . therefore, we should help the countries of central asia to receive leaves medieval feudal regimes that will contribute to the fact that a large part of their population will be used by us in

buildings as slaves, and we will join them when necessary, does the same apply there to ukraine or any other former republic. we should not annex ukraine now because we have no way to supply ukrainians with oil and gas at domestic russian prices. this could be a blow to the russian economy . let the ukrainians pay more and wait when we decide what the third formula will be. but at the same time, it is necessary to prevent these former soviet republics and oceans, which will later become part of historical russia, from entering into any of the western integration entities of nato and the european union because this entry will impose obligations on other members of these entities

. association with the european union. as you remember, it was an agreement that was absolutely far from any problem with russian interests, but the russians understood that it opened the way to nato, the european union, ukraine in the future, first of all to the european union, and then to nato is far away, that's why russia did everything possible to disrupt ukraine's smooth transition to nato membership, it's not a question of ukraine's membership in nato threatening russia's security - russia's security is threatened by the very existence of ukraine, because ukraine is simply russian territory occupied by the west and at the moment when russia decides to regain this territory, as i already mentioned this quote by tolstoy, there should be no entry to the polish border, no obligations to protect this territory, the russian federation has it is possible to have the borders of the former soviet union , with the exception of the baltic countries, that's all, that's why

finland's entry into the european union, nato and sweden into nato are of no critical importance for russia, what they say about it. part of the free world and in general did not treat finland as an independent state, as ukraine is treated now, that is why stalin invented kirill the finnish ssr there. the territory occupied by the soviet union was supposed to be annexed that is why the war against finland was launched, which was never considered a war in the soviet union, because in the soviet union-occupied town of tariloki, it is now the territory of the leningrad region of russia. communist otakousimin and in principle it was believed that the finns would live in the soviet union, since

only lithuanians and estonians began to live in it later in the 1940s, but the finns resisted the russian aggression. that the russians quickly abandoned this idea and from that time began to perceive films as a separate people. i think that the number of russians who died here and the equipment that was burned will force the russians to perceive ukrainians as a single people. we have to tell our story, no, russian chauvinist society accepts only one language of funerals, the number of graves will convince russians that russians are not ukrainians, this must be realized by those who are now trying to for some reason, to convince the russians, they are of course people with animal views, but they have always, at all times in the history of

russian statehood, perceived themselves as a minority and were a minority. chechens over kabardians over balkars over ossetians over tuvans over avarts over laksians over korels over mordovia over komi over chukchis over yakuts over evenks over buryats by the way they will wake up stopped with this list, everyone is now talking about the fact that you can

see how many beets there were in the war, and they really were possibly the main cannibals there, well, it’s understandable, a simple russian guy, vanya, it can’t be like that, it’s true, only beets, and i even read an article of analysis by a bolya journalist on the website of radio liberty siberia, the reality and this publicist , she is not speaking like that, we have to share equal responsibility with the russian people for this terrible war, and she tries to explain the mechanisms that generally lead to the russian army, why is this happening, but think about it, friends, 2000, you are definitely equally responsible, well, the truth is, russians live in almost all subjects of the russian federation, they study their language, culture, literature, whatever you want, yes, in general, there is a state-forming people, the buryats live in the

republic, the buryats live in the agent boryan district in the sardinian buryat district and in the irkutsk region of russia, and you understand that in all these four cases there is a completely different standard of living, the teaching of buryat culture and language, the possibility of remaining a buryat, and this is all depressing districts and in these rural boyar districts, the only way to survive is to join the army as a contractor, then they will give you a military mortgage, you can at least somehow buy a small apartment for yourself and these beets are used as cannon fodder by the russians, they are also used only by russians 111 million buryats died in the battle by the thousands near moscow in the 41st year, russians and ukrainians also perished, only this many millions of peoples and what was left of the beets later, they once thought and what is left now, i alone read there in many cases there in

this agent boyard district has no men because they were simply used as cannon fodder in the wars of the russian people for the russian territory, they graze on what vladimir putin invented for himself, and how is this supported by the russians ? storm is definitely not needed there. russian, where is ukrainian territory? they are definitely they don't consider ukraine to be some kind of russia, ethnic russians need it, and they are half a million of these unfortunate buryats. i'm not talking about other people there, the people of dagestan are small, but you just don't even realize that there, when there is a breeding ground, there is a certain number of representatives of some mountain people in dagestan , it will not be revived afterwards, this is genocide packed into genocide like a matryoshka doll, but the ukrainian genocide leads to buryatsky, there to avarsky and the great russian people are not to blame for what you suffer forever and uh, that's the question dmytro lavchenko and vitaliyovych are determined what is the reason for the change in tone in the russian message regarding ukraine's accession to the

european union? it is clear that they never agreed with such a possibility. and why two more places that is why they hid it, now they claim the opposite. i have already explained this formula. it seems to me that by answering the opposite question, uh, well, i think that when they started the negotiations, they tried, in their usual manner, to drag the ukrainian leadership into some kind of trap in order to get his consent to some kind of solution that, in their opinion, could destabilize the situation in ukraine and improve their opportunities for the occupation of ukrainian literature, because you will understand that they went to these negotiations in general just for that that the president of ukraine would make some decision that was caused by the uprising in kyiv and not in order to settle something, and therefore they could promise him that they would behave like europeans and join the european union. when they saw that it did not work, they did not return to their eternal rhetoric they don't want any negotiations, no

sea, when the russians sit down, they sit down at the negotiating table with you, it's either to pour tea into your tea , drink water, or to stabilize the situation in your country, so that it's easier with you will destroy all these negotiations of the russians from the 14th year to the 21st. they were always connected with these efforts, when president zelensky, let's say , thought about resuming these negotiations . opined by serhiy ryashin , kravchuk faced the task of recognizing ukraine as a state at the international level within the borders of the ussr in 1991, because then it was done, it was not done. fact, don't you think that in 2014, yatsenyuk faced the same challenge and

poroshenko, because i have no confidence that without efforts on the part of ukraine, the west would not recognize crimea as russian. i think that the west would still not recognize crimea as russian, although it was very important for us to show our position on this matter, because the very idea when one a country annexes the territory of another country, the misfortune of this country is the destruction of that international law that was staturized after the second world war. to understand the situation, i will give you the example of kosovo, which vladimir putin always likes to cite in his speeches. so that you understand it is correct that 90% of kosovo albanians always lived before the unification of kosovo with albania. afghans, but it was, you know, in that part of serbia, the albanians were always oppressed there since the royal times, the situation

did not change much during the socialist yugoslavia. it must be said that the idea of ​​uniting kosovo with albania has always been the main idea of ​​the mainstream in kosovo itself, i heard it on my own when i was still a pimple 1900 there, i remember there 90, i think it was the year or 89, from the first president of the newly recognized kosovo, ibrahimorogov, he was not yet the president, he was the leader of the kosovar goldatians, we discussed with him the issue of the unification of albania, which was still a communist state, he was already thinking about the future international community after milosevic actually engaged in the genocide of kosovar albanians, expelled them from their native land and forced nato to conduct an effective and precise operation against the milosevic regime, which forced the seva army to withdraw from the kosovar albanians were able to return to their homes, the international community agreed with the idea of ​​kosovo's independence, but not with the unification of

kosovar albania, because it understood that in this situation, in fact, it turns out that one state takes the territory of another with its consent, and that it thus dooms albania to serbia for the eternal conflict, there was an idea that sooner or later, let serbia and kosovo agree on coexistence as two states and only then establish their relations with neighboring countries, someone will recognize kosovo, someone will not admits that this is a long process, it is a very difficult process, but it is better than creating a process of eternal conflict between albanians and serbs at the state level, two albanian states are better than the union of albanians living in the region into one in such a situation, and putin in the situation with kryv went quite wrong from the point of view of the west, that is, if there was, say , the dpr of the lpr in crimea or abkhazia recognized by russia, perhaps this would not cause such a reaction from the west as the annexation of crimea to ukraine, and of course, without

solving this issue, we are to international law we will not return, but must cease to be a part of the russian federation, participants in the annexation of crimea must be punished. russia must be humiliated here and understand that it is not possible to annex foreign territories without the consent of these states, this is not kosovo, this hitlerism is pure water from the legal point of view. we have to realize all this and see that even this russian orthodox church patriarch kirill who is now a saint of war a bloody patriarch greetings of the synod of the ukrainian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate which even on the 78th day war did not manage to clearly call things by their names and in fact leaves not only himself but his

flock aside from this history that is happening today in ukraine, this is of course a tragedy not for bishops but for people who go to the churches of the ukrainian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate and it was necessary to talk about it separately but i just don't have time in this stream, i came back to this once, but somehow what why did i remember that even the russian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate did not change it canonical belonging to crimea crimea remains part of the ukrainian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate formally normally formally absolutely there is not even any doubt , but still, even patriarch kirill has more common sense here than putin and this whole criminalized company, even he understands that if he says that crimea is no longer the canonical territory of the ukrainian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate, he thus got on the wrong path and then easily got on this club path i am on all other fishing paths, therefore, i repeat, only

the restoration of the territorial integrity of ukraine will be the response of the civilized world to the latest barbarism to those nightmares that are connected with the uh, what are the neo-nazi ambitions of the russian political leadership and the russian people, who are undoubtedly jointly responsible for this crime we must clearly name the culprits, this is not putin's war, this is the war of the russian people against neighboring states and, by the way, against the peoples of the russian federation, which he has already proven in this stream and will be repeatedly proven because this is a very important topic that we have with you, always remember that we will return to this conversation in a week, we will always wait for good news, we must always remember that the ukrainian people will win this

fight against the black evil that attacked our earth , please stay with us and until the next meeting on this broadcast, vitaly portnikov was with you peace to you and victory every day, every moment even in war there is a miracle that moves, inspires and gives strength to believe in our victory, we appreciate the miraculous dream you know, oh, only money, it is very important in this difficult time to be aware of what is happening, we tell the news and help

to understand the events, but the war can make its adjustments in case the broadcast signal is lost, watch espresso on the satellite now espresso has become available on two satellites at once if you do not have a satellite dish and the broadcast signal has not appeared, search for espresso on the internet, our youtube channel