well, let's say with everyone who is involved, this is about a meeting about how i see a bee. kyiv was in lviv. i also went there for work. well, from the outside, the war has ended. yes, people are already living in this way. as if there is nothing anymore. and let's say this the war will not come again and i agree here that we must understand that nothing is over yet and the main thing is still ahead, because in addition to the fact that we need to end the war, we also need to win this war. uh, on the reconstruction of our country, that's why of course i am i would like to say that we must now all work for victory unequivocally and no one should stand in the party at the expense of the patriots, well, it has always been. that's why here i think it's not even that, mmm, it is necessary to

discuss here the history itself, everything is arranged in its own way and people see who who and what efforts are being made to win this war, british intelligence reported that in recent weeks , russia has released generals who had many defeats in the initial stages of the invasion of ukraine. this is the publication that refers to british intelligence lieutenant general serhiy kisil, who commanded the elite first guards tank army, was suspended because he failed to take kharkiv, and admiral igor osipov, who commanded the black sea fleet of russia, was also probably suspended after the sinking of kaiser moscow in april. it is also known that the chief of the general staff of russia, valery gerasimov, probably remains in office, but it is not yet known whether he retains the trust of president putin, at the same time there is a lot of information that all operations are military

operations and the war in ukraine are managed directly by vladimir putin, in your opinion , colonel, can personnel changes in the russian armed forces significantly affect their advancement in ukraine, of course, the russian federation is now making such changes, and this i will say yes, thanks in particular to our defenders because i say once again they tried - old generals who grew up on russian corruption who got their titles there because of nepotism or after all for money came here for a quick war, we see how i live and live the instigators of the traitors and the army generals who are his general staff and when they faced each other in a real war, everyone realized that they were unfit to be profs

and therefore take on a great responsibility by earning a lot of money and counting on what they will be later it is good to live in retirement and it is better somewhere in europe and not in unwashed russia, as the classic once wrote, and their children will study there, they eventually understood what was happening and i think they did not want to get dirty, but understanding that already got dirty, but counting on some kind of non -progress, let’s say so, if, after all, they don’t go to the end, then, also understanding this, he recruits young officers, whom i think offers a good future, and young officers when you give them a task they are ready and when you show trust in them , especially at a high level, i think they are he expects that they will be more bloodthirsty and more precisely, er, perform tasks. this is done

for that and often er. efficiency and on their er let's say this, the examples showed how not to do it well, these er are really mistakes of the russian federation yes, i would say, i would like to say something else, er, we should not make such mistakes er, let's say so, now there in the supreme the council has registered draft law 738, where number 80 is about uh, let's say, the reform of our intelligence service of the foreign intelligence service and the military intelligence service of the security service of ukraine . very dangerous, there are uh, what questions

they can just now during the war destroy and disrupt the work of our intelligence and that is why it is necessary to remove the draft law in general. i think we will talk about it at the committee today in particular, but i say once again that during the war there there are deputies who signed a lot of signatories. by the way, not a single deputy, well , except for the author, there is no member of the committee on the issue of defense security and intelligence and all the others. i think they simply did not read it or signed it, let them see what they signed and just ask their colleagues, if you do not understand national security and defense issues, then it is better to approach and ask if it is necessary or not necessary, or if it is necessary to do so during the war, for example, to destroy the foreign intelligence service, which has been destroyed there for many years, which has already been destroyed for two years in the last few years

sixth b their leader, instead of developing the institution, simply cuts and destroys in order not to approach the reform of the security service of ukraine in a comprehensive manner and to adopt a law on the security service of ukraine that we worked on and tear it out from there, the parts that later in the complex have nothing in common, nothing at all from the reform, when we , er, take away the possibility of possessing intelligence information, the armed forces of ukraine, transferring from military intelligence under parking to another department. i wrote that, and such mistakes should not be made if we are talking about the russian federation. let them do what they want. they appoint someone. well, here we are, who must work for our country if we have established institutions. then we must support these institutions, must develop them, if a specific person does not

cope with this institution, he cannot manage such a body, appoint a person who can do it . we will cut him, we will destroy him, we will take away his powers why because someone does not understand what he is needed for, this cannot be done now, i am just saying this as a warning, i will stand for it to the end i won't allow it to be done, but those who write are probably doing it or unconsciously it is here i hope unconsciously let's talk more about weapons because yesterday and this is the prime minister of the russian federation yuriy borisov said that russia uses some kind of laser in order to save money the newest weapon is very reminiscent of german propaganda, and there they tried to talk about the miracle weapon in the

intervaffe and that they will now destroy everyone with these weapons, well, that is, there are always certain myths about weapons that are possible and do not exist, but which are always frightening russia always scares the united states of america with some kind of supersonic missiles that they release, they show some cartoons about this, about these missiles , here is a story about a laser weapon that is apparently used at a distance of 5 km. you know very well the situation at the front. they are laser weapons. did you witness these laser weapons or are they just a bunch of propagandists, let’s say yes, i felt a lot of weapons of some kind here on me, uh, in the war in general, in the mykolaiv direction, and 152 and winged

rockets flew here hailstorms and hurricanes and tornado tanks are constantly shelling yes that and the other strilkova, but what are the consequences of a laser one? something they survive there. well, i am like a modern one. according to our positions , i don't see this particular weapon, you know, the russian federation scares somehow with the newest weapons or in general with some kind of strengthening of the influence on ukraine, let's say, with the use of other types of weapons, let's say yes, russia has already used and used all the most powerful that it had, this is what remains of nuclear weapons , or there are biological weapons, i have the impression that they have not used yet, they have not used uh, well, this is already such a weapon, you know, after which the russian federation itself is unlikely to be there

will they stay, they have to understand, that's why it's the russian federation that scares them, and they went on the offensive against ukraine. the first time it's to seize and i say once again to return the influence to the sir, the other thing is to show the whole world what a strong russian army in order to carry out such a military foreign policy in the future and show it. look. we will somehow not cooperate there. then we will also have your turn , and i think that the plans included ukraine and in the future eastern europe, the return of influence to all of eastern europe . europe at least. well, in other countries, as it was in the soviet union, there in asia, there are no other reasons in russia. and we have more and more reasons every day, where russia wanted to demilitarize us, but we partially militarized at the expense of the russian federation itself, when they took a lot of their

equipment from them. well, and at the expense of partners who are now providing us with the latest modern weapons, the supply is increasing every day, so i think that russia miscalculated not only in terms of nationalization and in demilitarization, too. by the way, the washington post , citing official sources of the united states of america, reports that ukraine transferred to israel and egypt the amount of military aid received from the united states of america, according to data publication of only the first full-scale russian invasion, the amount of american aid in ukraine amounted to almost 4 billion dollars, a new package of 40 billion dollars is planned, of which 20 billion should go to defense, you as a prospect, we will demilitarize the russian federation, you as a participant in the war you see this aid and how the ukrainian

military is learning or mastering this latest weapon that comes from the united states of america, according to your estimates, how long does it take for the ukrainian military to learn manage this equipment and effectively manage this equipment, you know what the priority of western weapons is, and this is what we will need to direct the development of our defense-industrial complex after the war, when we will rebuild it, this is technology, on the one hand, on the one hand, it is complicated, well, complicated more probably inside there are more electronic technologies, but at the exit, when it comes, the role comes down to the operator or, er, consumer. it is quite light, it is mastered much easier than those samples of soviet weapons that

we have and here we will need to build a defense-industrial complex in order to, let's say, minimize the participation in that shot as much as possible in working with this device er, the operator itself, the person who will er, who will work with this weapon, why is this being done for so that we understood that when the war started, most of us came to the front. they were mobilized, many of them did not actually serve in the army. in general, they were either students, or some kind of it staff there, or some other, it doesn't matter, but they when they they come, they are given, for example, the same javelin or the same in love, and you, for example, need an hour of time to be told how to use it, and then you press, well, there you take its sight , check it, capture the target with a thermal imager,

let it go, throw a missile and a missile everything is done for you, you are not right, you don't have to, you don't need to accompany, you don't need to do anything, that's how you know, the maximum exclusion of the operator is from this process of the human factor . it is necessary to exclude the human factor from the process of war as much as possible so that it is all done by automation well, just think and strategically plan the tasks , let them be people and execute them, let there be more of them. that's why, returning to your question , american weapons, they are uh, we understand it is easier to prepare for it, it is much more accurate and more practical, more practical and, let’s say, has more combat capabilities on the battlefield, so it is the easiest to learn from my point of view, many

samples of various types have already arrived directly in i have a person in the unit to train a person. well, i will say that sometimes it takes a few hours, when our samples require days of a week, and sometimes operators and a month. other western countries, because we know that the representatives of the forty countries agreed in rammstein on military aid to ukraine, will our accession to nato be accelerated, because one of the requirements of nato was the compliance of the army with nato requirements in two and a half months, and during the eight years of the war, the ukrainian army gained that experience, which is obviously not available in many countries

that are members of nato, that is, in the military. to reject all these demands that are related to reforms within the state, the conformity of the system of the political system and the judicial system that exists in the state will speed up whether or not you know i would like you to name me at least one country that could during the aggression of the russian federation uh-uh to make such a resistance, what uh-uh and to wage a war like ukraine is doing, can ukraine leave nato now, is it ready, you know , of course i am joking, but i will ask here the question, is nato ready to enter ukraine really, the ukrainian army has shown itself that it can to fight with a country that has positioned itself as one of the

strongest armies in the world, a country that has the largest territory in the world, a country that has the largest nuclear potential in the world . number of missiles when you count, well, one of the largest nuclear potentials in the world. they have tactical nuclear weapons. they have a greater human resource. they have a greater mobilization space , a technical resource, that is, they have more of it, and we fight against them, we fight and do not surrender their territories are not only pretending, but we plan and carry out successful yes, so far at the tactical level, but uh , active actions, offensive operations fight because it united our ukraine. therefore, now the

question is not whether we are ready. it became clear to everyone and therefore it became clear to the whole world that ukraine is ready not only to create, i'm sorry, to join nato, but also to lead any military alliance in the perspective of eastern europe or of course , i'm just teasing now, but i want to say that this is what we have shown to the whole world at the expense of weapons. well, just the weapons that we are currently receiving. of course. yes, we need to switch to weapons that are standardized by our allies. and now our allies are most of the nato countries have their own caliber, because we, for example, now even have a problem with the fact that the weapons that our soviets have, well, they are of the soviet model. russian federations are all civilized countries, democratic countries that support us. and where we went with you, where it is written in the constitution, they switched to those

standards, and these are not just standards, because there are different calibers, because they are better, they are in russia if all the weapons are still from the 70s, 70s and 80s, so everything is modern here, it is constantly being modernized, so we really need to switch to those standards. but we should not think that now we will have equipment and through this equipment we will become standardized and yes, as a member of nato, which is there on equal terms, we need in the future to think about our defense-industrial complex , all the standardized uh-uh, these uh-huh projectiles, ammunition, and weapons. once when he became dependent there on one of the countries well, you are already the united states and when in the doomsday war we remember he was embargoed there and they could not fight back because

politics is the same, remember as one of the english said prime ministers that there are no eternal friends and eternal enemies, there are eternal state interests and we must move away from this, therefore we must proceed according to the principle of self-sufficiency, to manufacture our defense industrial complex must be directed, in principle, to the fact that we we can provide ourselves with tanks, jet systems, or fire cartridges, ammunition, and armed, yes, maybe some technological things are serious, we need them, we can buy them somewhere , but still, for general military combat, we must have long-range missiles , we must have them i think there will be opposition, especially among our partners, but for the survival of the country, we must have such weapons, and the country should understand that this is a matter of our survival , and after the war we will have many more discussions after victory, what weapons will we have, what will we be , but once again we must aim for

self-sufficiency, when we ourselves can defend ourselves, then we will play an important role in uh-uh international politics, if we only accept some restrictions, well, it's starting all over again, especially when our neighbors have an eternal enemy , e.e. russia, that is, for several centuries we have been fighting for our independence and for the right to be free from the russian federation against this background. what is happening now in ukraine against the background of a terrible war, witnesses sweden and finland have decided to join nato, they have already submitted an official application to the nato headquarters in brussels, and the full stop will be put, obviously, within a year, this will weaken russia and its position in ukraine, because what i always talked about putin, why don't we allow missile complexes on our borders to

be so close to moscow? is it somewhere near st. petersburg? and now it turns out that from finland to st. petersburg, it's a couple of minutes of flight, and the missiles are their efforts. attention and their armed forces, will they now be transferred to the northern front because the northern front appears in them? finland, everyone has already declared territorial claims to the russian federation, and finland was a neutral state in 1945, but we see how the northern countries of europe like them united against the russian federation, well, that is, putin set certain tasks to prevent ukraine from joining nato, instead, he received the northern alliance of states that joined nato, which will now one way or another pose a certain threat according to putin of the russian federation, you know, when you raise

such serious topics, you immediately know that such thoughts jump into your head at the expense of the overall strategic level of the russian federation, when they were going to demilitarize us, when they were going to prevent the expansion of nato to the east or the expansion of nato in general, when they told, do you remember these conditions, whether nato should return to its borders in 1996 or 1997, and all these moments can be listed now, and as a result, they received a blow from ukraine from the ukrainian armed forces, which they didn't count on the armed forces at all, uh, now they have turned the whole world against you, the whole world, well, the whole world is a conditionally civilized world, so uh, europe uh, in the majority, they started, well, the key players began to

provide aid to ukraine, when to give up the russian uh, there of russian imports er, well, let's just say that they were completely closed in a cocoon, and nato is also expanding, including in the er east, yes, in the north, there is half to the northeast, plus , with the help of sweden, the baltic sea will also be there. now it is there that bracket bars baltic fleet is not there will be no strategic static superiority there, nato will always be asked to let us go, please. we will go out into the atlantic and swim there. and what will the swedes say there? sorry , we can't sit in a puddle here. that's why i don't know . years, who do not look beyond their wallets and the robbery of their own people, and otak, they have a strategy, they wanted to allow one, but they did much worse for their country, but i do not

know now which country in particular will accept some decisions that pro-russian business or pro- russians said the russians, in particular, the sexes got the reverse effects that they wanted, they also set up some global countries that were also looking at some goals, let's say in the indian ocean, such as china and others countries that thought that after this lightning-fast victory they would be able to implement their plans for the return of what they consider to be their legitimate territories. but after all this, they realized that this is already unrealistic and they will now have their own relations there because, well, let's say they didn't give me the opportunity to do it, and the fact that they constantly flaunted training with the russian federation, the same chinese, uh, what is it like one of the strongest armies in the world, and now they saw how

they were stuck in a european country, which, let's say, was not the most economically developed, but with from my point of view, the most now morally and value-combined. sbu roman kostenko, people's deputy of ukraine, a cyborg man who is now with a weapon in his hands defending our independence and our freedom friends, please subscribe to our social networks, you can now see these links on your screens, we are in almost all social networks, subscribe to us on youtube please like this video . if you see us on youtube or facebook, subscribe to our channels on youtube and

facebook. follow our news on the espresso tv website. i 'll say goodbye to you until monday. next is our telethon. continues take care of yourself and your loved ones goodbye watch espresso news and euro espresso programs for ukrainian refugees in europe on the air, joint broadcast with the atp channel, radio svoboda programs, voice of america time-time programs, inclusion of public television journalists, bbc news ukraine and france 24 as well as the broadcast of the informational marathon, the only news, together we are the strength, glory to ukraine, open a rainbow path to the sky, forgive me for the sun, embroider a minishka, so that on that

path with swans, with us, swim for happiness in white boats, happy vyshyvanka day of ukrainians, your espresso channel