vadim, this is the latest information from british intelligence. british intelligence officers compared the losses of russians in the war in ukraine and the losses of russians in the war in afghanistan, which lasted almost 10 years. in the first three months of the war in ukraine, the number of dead in russia is probably the same as in the soviet union during its of the ten -year war in afghanistan. the offensive in donbas resulted from a combination of poor tactics at low altitudes with limited air cover, a lack of flexibility and a command approach that is ready to exacerbate failures and repeat mistakes, the introduction is noted well, we remember that the war in afghanistan ended literally two years after the withdrawal of troops from afghanistan, the soviet union fell apart and, in principle, the war in afghanistan significantly exhausted

the soviet union not only with physical losses of personnel, but also with financial losses, which simply ceased to exist for two years, now you can draw some parallels with the losses with, well, the financial costs of a similar war with the russians, please , any parallel stories, they are quite conditional if we are talking about the losses of the russians in the luhansk war and the upper one, they did not lose 15,000 for all on 15 thousand 51 soldiers and about 54,000 wounded, but at the same time it should be understood that about 620,000 people were involved in the afghan war and about 450 of them got hepatitis and so on and so on well, that's why we are talking about losses here, in fact, yes, they are in a month, if we do not consider infectious diseases. they have identical losses in two months, too, exactly what they had in 10 years, but the key problem eh

developed one if we are talking about the owner himself, only one of the reasons eh beheaded the soviet union, the key reason was not the loss, in fact the losses were relatively small within the soviet union, the losses were that the soviet union lost one of the pillars of its existence - it is pride with a great powerful an army that was, according to soviet propaganda, the best in the world, actually speaking. if we talk about financial and human losses, they are not as important as symbolic losses, and that is why when we talk about the e-e war, why do i so often and a lot emphasize the information war, because the russians must understand that they do not have a great milosian army that can protect them and this will hit them no less and maybe even more than the fact that they lose er x er money every day and lose 15,000 each let's go so 10 each 000 people every month, from this point of view, the

information war will play an equally important role if we can break through their idiocy that we are fighting fascism and so on. for the people, in principle, we will be able to overcome the russian empire as well. here, once again, i can only call on everyone who has the opportunity and knows someone in the russian federation, and even if you hate talking to these people, do not forget to talk about how they praise their country with vadym's actions about belarus, did he want to ask you? oblast says the ukrainian general staff for the threat of missile and air strikes from the territory of belarus remains. is there

still a threat from the territory of belarus ground invasion, in your opinion, please. i think that a ground invasion from the side of belarus by the belarusian army will definitely happen now, in fact, realistically, we do not see the concentration of russian troops, you belarus. yes, there are certain small parts, but to say that this is enough for that to launch an offensive either on chernihiv or on kyiv region well, so far it looks like there is no silom for this, why are they doing it here right now, well, that is, they continued their training, their training has been going on for about a week two. i think that this is a request from the russian federation so that we are forced to concentrate a certain part of our troops in this direction and not to transfer them to the south. excuse me to the east and to the south. that is, it is actually a game in help to the russian federation, but without the involvement of the

belarusian army in the territory of ukraine, regarding whether the russians will now try to provoke belarus, unfortunately, there is a possibility of this, and unfortunately, i mean shelling , as before there were airplanes to the border and then the shelling of our territories from belarusian territories, unfortunately, this is all quite likely vadim , and what do you think about what is currently happening in the liberated territories, in particular, today we spoke with the deputy of the hall of the kharkiv city council, he says that i would like to see more of the local budget now and local efforts went to the fortification of cities that remain on the border, to fortifications of some kind there. well, more. and we see that they have already relaxed a little there. ruins, well, they are engaged in some such matters, which are less aimed at fortification and defense. how would

you like to see it, well, this is sumyshchyna, chernihiv region, kyiv region, kharkiv region, how can we strengthen, we need to dismantle the living, yes. they are needed, if we are talking about fortification, well, this is a matter of military administrations and the army, that is, i understand that in this case, everyone on their part knows what they are doing, that is, in this case, i would rather trust the military, who understand what needs to be done and how it needs to be done, so let's talk about what is the average temperature in the ward eh well, it’s not necessary for sure and it’s difficult, but the fact is that many people are really starting to relax and begin to think that so eh war is somewhere far away and let’s try how eh war turns into an anti-terrorist operation, but this is actually it's quite an unpleasant moment, so in this case, it's obvious that it's still necessary

to understand that this should be decided by the military. one more question to ask. so, regarding the supply of weapons, mr. vadim, the white house adviser on the security of ukraine, speak because i don't have to rights to comment on the supply of weapons simply no, i, in general, about those dangers, uh, jaysullivan said that the white house is convinced that russia will not be able to prevent the united states from providing military aid to ukraine, he said that we have a diversified and stable chain of arms supply to ukraine, so even if the russians can aim and hit some cargo on the territory of ukraine, from a strategic point of view, it will not stop the military assistance that we provide, said jake sullivan, i wanted to ask mr. volodymyr, how do you actually ask one of the heads of the ministry of internal affairs a question or are you still in touch, is there one denysenko is gone, did you

scare him with his question about jake sally, she well, in fact, it is not possible to comment on the supply of weapons , so ask about the video recording system on ukrainian roads, which began working on may 16 and records the movement of all cars in the online mode including the weapons of fuel tankers and other strategic goods coming from the western border and the russians in the case of there. well, if they hack this system, they can easily monitor online to see which weapons are going where trucks, what kind of gas trucks, where exactly are they moving in your life? they even hack the election system of the leading democracies of the world and interfere in the elections, why should they hack our system, video recording from the recording of the ministry of affairs of ukraine and see what weapons, where, exactly,

which part of ukraine, vadym denysenko often goes he has a dialogue on our air, let 's switch dmytro, have fun, he is already with us, a deputy of the mariupol council, dmytro. we greet you. good morning. please tell us what the current situation is in mariupol. from the latest news, the occupiers are going to forcefully evacuate more than 500 people, what is happening there now, well, in general the occupiers are trying to return people to mariupol with all sorts of truths and lies, telling them that if they do not come, their housing, which is intact, will be given to other citizens, why are they doing it for that so that about 75% of the city's residents left mariupol, and they understand that even for them, there is a

russian society that is not on the stove. propaganda, his image will be unacceptable. well , because if 70-75% of the people left, it's obvious what the people of mariupol didn't expect was the departure of the taxes of the so -called liberation of the mariupol occupiers. the tense situation regarding water supply and food products continues. the people who sort out the rubble there are men, they are generally only given food if they will sort it out for you, and there are also a lot of problems with the drinking water there, in terms of quality and quantity, that is, the occupiers do not provide residents and

continue to commit the genocide that they started to commit since the end of february, and now the residents of the city, who even want to leave, unfortunately do not have such an opportunity, because the occupiers understand that they will be left with an empty city if all the people who really want to leave, uh, they will leave mariupol and what is happening in the city itself, because you have already talked about the imminent ecological disaster, are the communal services working? well, somehow this sewerage and water and everything else there were many corpses on the streets what is there now what is happening there i listened to your e-e ether before connecting e-e and talking there about the fact that the russians are the occupiers of such a

barbarian there, some technologies, well, it’s not about them at all, there from bihovovskogo manages the city from biologivskog, alcoholics, drug addicts and former there are criminal elements, that's why they have no understanding of how the city should function, they tried to make a waste with the connection of the water supply, when they put it in quotation marks, it flooded practically the entire city, and rivers of water just started there uh, on the streets uh, and uh, unfortunately, many people were buried near high-rise buildings, and now it will rain there and wash it all away, it uh, carries a big threat, the epidemic of uh, the situation uh, and it can lead to an outbreak of

some infectious diseases and, unfortunately, now it will only get warmer and therefore it is just a matter of time because uh all this will get into the groundwater there and those wells where people are now collecting water on their own there is something that no one controls the quality and there it can start just uh in relation to the plant there and growth it's really there. russia bombed azovstal with its aircraft and could damage the storage of chemicals that are near the sea of ​​azov and currently there is no way to check this information there. but if these substances reach the sea of ​​azov, it will be a problem not only in ukraine, not only in russia, it is terrorist, and

probably also in turkey, because in fact the fauna of the entire sea of ​​azov can die from this. this is the difficult situation in mariupol. the occupiers continue to dismantle the rubble and hide the consequences of their crimes when they killed more than 20,000 people. they burned part of it in crematoria, and part of it was simply buried somewhere in the so-called mass graves. i wanted to briefly quote the post of petr andryushenko, adviser to the mayor of mariupol, he writes about the so-called restoration of mariupol, he writes one of the plans of sablin ivanov's group, this is how the local gauleiter understands it, it is indicative of the restoration of mariupol within the rostov region, a new symbol like crimea or grozny, it is clear why the money is big, a cash flow on which you can comfortably sit, but then donetsk generally recedes into the

background, all the efforts of the curators to shili na in 8 years turns into a pumpkin instead of a pile of money , that's why suddenly, under the patronage of curators , kadyrov and his marauders appear, where it's not just keeping fear in the city and looting as the guarantee that there will be no separate financing of the strengthening of the political importance of mariupol to ensure such a scenario of the spread has already begun to weaken mariupol in terms of the repressive machine, so the people's militia of the dpr has already received an order to withdraw from mariupol and return to it, which will significantly weaken not only control over localities, but the likelihood is small according to collaborators it is the kadyrov scenario that is growing. please comment. well, who are these people, sablin ivanov, and are they really? well , according to the distribution of money, they will be directly watch the people, kadyrov's protégés, his entourage, look, what's going on, eh. between the occupiers and

collaborators, and where is the actual war for the redistribution of spheres of influence and simply making money from it ? a good occupier and cooperation, a dead occupier, er, and actually speaking, why did the story appear as a scotyrov, er, among the residents who remained there, they gave me such information that er, they are launching such bags that, well, look, russia over there , grozny, has restored everything there, so if will come there is chechnya, kadyrs, kadyrovs, so everything will be fine for you. that is, this is one part of the story, and the second part of the story is being launched. actually, the history there is really pushed there . it

's about money, they want to destroy the azovstalna metal plant and export it through sports, and now, actually, between the fsb groups and between the political authorities, there are such confrontations, so they will make more money from this, so there is nothing about people at all there is nothing there at all about there is some kind of state-building - it's banal, well, there's some russian doctrine about state-building and imperial ambitions. and all those officials of theirs - it's just talking there in their slang about loot because of it. actually speaking, there will be nothing better for the people and there is a lot of it in general who practically everyone does not believe that russia will be able to build something there, especially those who know who has relatives in russia. well,

how is everything happening there? planned groups to earn people's money on this, they don't count at all, they don't need them, thank you for the time you found a guitar for us dmytro dmytro zamazin, a member of the mariupol council, was our guest . director of the defense express information consulting company serhiu, we welcome you, i congratulate you. good morning , good afternoon, mr. serhiu. well, let me ask you the question that i could not ask vadym denisenko, he disconnected a little earlier from our broadcast, jake sullivan, the white house national security adviser, said that the white house is convinced that russia will not be able to prevent the united states from providing military aid to ukraine, sullivan said, we have a

diversified and stable supply of weapons to ukraine, so even if the russians can target the chain and hit some cargo on the territory of ukraine, from a strategic point of view, this will not stop the military assistance that we provide, what are the dangers of targeting all these cargoes, to what extent are they real dangers, mr. serhiy, and in view of this comment me. well, maybe i’m wrong, maybe i don’t understand the technical nuances and points. well, on the 16th, it seems, on may 16th, the ministry of internal affairs introduced and resumed the operation of video recording cameras. it seems that there are 270 cameras. exactly the number on all highways of ukraine from west to east in the center will be fixed 24/7 around the clock. is there any danger at all?

they organized hacker attacks there, in fact, they hacked the election system of the world's leading democracies, the kharkiv attacks were carried out on state institutions, organizations in europe, in the united states , and it is obvious that the video recording system is also quite easy to either hack or bribe, because the operator there seems to be a private company. operates this system and then in online mode observe where which truck, which weapon is going, which fuel truck or which other strategic cargo to what extent it may be dangerous for those cargoes which are moving through the territory of ukraine, i am asking for your word in fact regarding the threat of destruction of logistics supplies that the russian federation is trying to implement with its missile strikes, this has been going on for more

than the first month. are wide, they are sufficiently branched. i hope that and in what way this situation will not change for the worse for us in the direction of video recording and related the risks, in fact, we didn’t even notice how and how quickly we managed to get bee hives already on the territory of ukraine, because i have such and such deliveries to the border were made centrally, then small trucks and small gazelles were also involved, that is, so much let’s say it was a dispersed flow er, the supply of these weapons components, which was actually difficult to track, if we are talking about the fact that there may be risks related to the hacking of video surveillance cameras, then i think that one of the directions coincides with the american the party was just directed to strengthen cyber defense in all directions. i think that this

risk should also be taken into account and the enemy's interference with our surveillance cameras should be minimized if at all such a threat exists. so , to be honest, i don't see any special challenges in this. thank you. us, the military situation about belarus, he already started talking today so simply, they distract our attention, is there really still a threat of a repeated ground attack on the territory of the ukrainian state that belarus conducts intelligence and deploys on the border with in ukraine, additional units in the volyn and polis areas, the armed forces of belarus are actively conducting reconnaissance, additional units are being deployed in the border areas of the gomel region, this process has been going on for several weeks, and the main part of the game in the states, experts connect this with the fact that, in fact, belarus is lying around from russia, trying to create a -th vision of such a certain threat, if not for him, it is impossible now to abandon

our units in the most relevant areas of the front. planes to launch missile strikes and precisely the use of missile weapons that can be used from the territory of the belarusians, these threats really persist and they are much higher than the use of ground forces or landing forces of belarus or russia from the territory of belarus. i think that these risks are much less because i will repeat missile or official strikes, the example of great britain boris johnson said that britain will redouble its efforts to provide ukraine with vital food products and humanitarian aid cnnl reports this with reference to a statement from johnson's office during a telephone conversation with the president of ukraine, volodymyr zelenskyi. johnson talked about the vile russian blockade of the leading port city of odessa. the prime minister promised to

work to ensure that the country could export to the rest of the world. the leaders agreed to because the international community must remain united in its condemnation of putin's barbarism. well, according to johnson, every country is obliged to help ukraine in the fight for freedom as it is now and in the long-term perspective, how real is the unblocking of the black sea, and in particular odessa, well, illichivska or chornomorska, as it is now called, can all the anti-ship missiles that we are waiting for our weapons help to unblock ukrainian ports on the black sea, please well, in fact, we see that all european countries representatives of the un include talking about the crisis related to things with food and that this is connected , including with the consequences of that of the russian federation regarding the blocking of our ports from the point of view of the military segment of the acquisition of components that can remove the blockade. that is exactly this week,

or rather, even today, the meeting of the minister of defense in rammstein, a country on nato, the united states, and britain, where it can be said that the arrival of hostilities will be announced on the one hand, from from the ukrainian side, and from the other side, i will tell you about the need for certain weapons in order to satisfy primary and medium-term needs, the question of obtaining anti-ship missiles is indeed on this list, the american the party previously talked about the fact that there are negotiations that there are two types of missiles, because they are norwegian or american, but in general, i think that the increase will probably be approved somewhat later, because now there are probably other options where the blockades are there i.e., in the use of nato fleets, the use of special convoys that can protect the movement of our

ships in the black sea are being discussed, and this is precisely what requires the direct military-political race- negotiations of such a tougher and targeted plan in order not to put only the solution to the question of where the posters of the parks are on only one anti-ship missile i think that this entry is correct but not sufficient. that is, you think that nato ships can provide military escort for ukrainian merchant vessels that go to odessa from odessa. type, let's say it's quite complicated, but conventionally speaking, if we say that russia is creating problems , the basis for hunger all over the world, and the issue of security just affects the component of the protection of the roads where we can export grain and food for the whole world. i think this can become the basis for more conceptual and tough approaches to unblocking our ports without putting this

task on only one ukraine with a limited number of anti-ship missiles. and i am interested in your opinion as a military expert here the discussion turned to mandatory mobilization and not leaving the ban on men going abroad. yes, we have a corresponding petition, and zelensky was asked a question, he commented on this petition by saying what do you know? i probably don't fully understand who this petition is for. this petition should be addressed to the parents of those soldiers who were lost because of what they defended at the cost of their lives. well , the president appeals to the emotions . she gained the necessary number of votes of 25,000 subscribers and even more in order to cancel the ban on leaving ukraine for men aged 18 to 60. i see in the comments here that very huge discussions are taking place. how do you feel about this, mr. serhiy in fact, i am also a former military man who is a

supporter of the fact that the men remained in ukraine, the situation with the war will be quite difficult and long. we still have enough personnel after several waves of mobilization, but we understand that hostilities can be long and everyone must prepare to participate in this process in one form or another, the key is to prepare now it looks like the military is fighting there. well, plus volunteers, and they are just kept here. we don't see them at the level of our communities, for example, i don't see any active training or emergency training of men who have no military education and no military experience, that is, they just sit and wait while they are being mobilized, they are not trained, they are not

given weapons, at least to hold it is normal. well, in fact, the training process really needs more activation, primarily because of the situation with territorial defense, i think that mom says that we started to feed the defense later than we need it, but we have already drawn conclusions that directly er, the time for preparing the troops and the defense should be longer in relation to each other . all citizens will be involved in the preparation of the defense, the conduct of hostilities from 7 o'clock, i think that the political, military, political, political leadership of ukraine should come to a conclusion, so that it really does not get the impression that we are just people we keep in ukraine, but we do not create conditions for their training so that they are really fighters and not just listed as potential

mobilized , everyone shoots in general. there are already 700,000 people who are protecting the country, different people are talking about the fact that we should go for another million, i just don't understand now that we have to give another million to 700 or, as my mother says, 300 or go to a million personnel, in fact, the number of personnel we currently have is sufficient to deter russian actions, and now the question is not so much the number. unfortunately, we can't get in, because we have a moment of silence. serhiy gudzorets, a military expert, was our guest at 9:00 a.m. every morning, there is a moment of silence for all the dead