derived from the fact that the state did not have a specific internal state policy, it still does not exist today, so that you know the values ​​of such moments were the same for the residents of transcarpathia and the residents of the center and residents of the day or the north, but the fact that such a policy was not first developed and little by little, its implementation is completely absent, how can you implement something that doesn’t exist, that’s why there is a gap. we have to evaluate and take certain steps today so that this program is filled absolutely absolutely. i just literally today i read a large article on the mirror of the week, which is devoted to the fact that it is not clear what to do with

textbooks, because there are several problems at once . first, a billion hryvnias are needed to print them. that all of them are, most of them are morally outdated. well, how do you study children now with a textbook where, for example, a third of the textbook is filled with pushkin and lermontov, do you understand foreign literature or the knitting needles of history, and i thought, well is something being done in this direction, i just don't know very well. for example, ukraine can help to make a complete electronic course, for example, the history of language and literature for the crimean tatars who remain, for example, in crimea or are in ukraine, it doesn't matter what, eh, i'm sure of that that a course that is studied online, let's say for any student in ukraine, he should not be cut off from such a жек and for a child who has a

desire to study it there in the occupied territory and today there are no restrictions at all for that it was available and as far as i know there were attempts and it was connected with these preparatory courses for the admission of applicants from the occupied territories, but to say that there is some platform by joining which a child can get a full, let's say, state standard of education for ukrainians in the ukrainian language and, accordingly, confirm it later with a state certificate or some kind of certificate of completion of this course, which is two or also behind the wall as well as education, general general damage, of course, there is no well, it’s simple the task that needs to be done, and there are no problems. thank you very much, psuf, let’s go to battle.

thank you for finding the time, and he is the truth. but maybe it will sound strange to someone, and still the russian colors are the official flag of the autonomous republic of krym, as they are almost identical, that is, the symbols and coats of arms , the flag is identical to how you use it, almost identical to those who decided on such a panda and still on the flag of our people, which is always next to the ukrainian flag, is everywhere in the council of europe . our flag hangs everywhere near the building of the ministry of foreign affairs in kyiv. everyone knows that it is the flag of the crimea of ​​the crimean tatars. but it has not yet been resolved. this symbolism well, simply because it is official russian now in the

ukrainian e-e in the ukrainian region it was so temporary for eight years it was not for that it was not for that it was for renaming the populated areas it was not for that to secure the rights of the crimean tatars of zay not to that not to that not to that that's what we have what we have i don't want to go into detail about it we are waiting for the next guest who should tell us to comment on the situation on the eastern front where now uh there was already shown dmytro chernyk military expert mr. peter good day good day glory to ukraine heroes glory to ukraine i would actually like to ask you right away, after all, your assessment of the situation now in the north of donetsk, we have a message from yuriy butusov, who is present there, that russian troops have entered the highway bakhmut-lysichansk in the area of ​​the villages of nagirne and belogorivka and the highway is closed, what does this actually

mean? what will be the further development? look , guess the correct development. it is of course difficult because war is a very complex complex phenomenon. a devastating defeat in the first stage of the modern russian-ukrainian war , that is, he failed to take kyiv in three days and therefore failed to eliminate ukrainian statehood, the enemy must set before himself at least some strategic task and the biggest strategic task for him today is the capture of the entire southeastern southeastern ukraine and the maintenance of the so-called corridor to crimea . the borders of the luhansk and donetsk regions and to hold them, we must

firmly say to ourselves that the battle is difficult, the battle is serious and the enemy is not going to surrender. we understand well that the defeat of the enemy as such b complex understanding of this word will lead to the defeat of modern moscow imperialism and, first of all, to the defeat of putin as its reflection and even to his physical death, therefore closing this so-called small cauldron around severodonetsk and lysychansk is their strategic principle goal and they will throw all possible forces and resources for this, at the same time, there is a certain strategic optimism here, no matter how strange it sounds that they lacked the strength and means for a big cauldron, and they are on all their propaganda they shouted on the channels as much as they could that they would surround the ukrainian troops almost to dnipropetrovsk and break through a land corridor not only to crimea, but also to odessa and further to transnistria

, which shows that they don't have real serious resources for a big war. we have a big and difficult battle ahead of us, and we have no choice, this is the logic of this war, and there is nothing left but to concentrate all our will , our tactical skill, all possible resources and gradually win back every scrap of our land, i also want to emphasize that the strategic plan chosen by our military-political leadership is correct. i am not a supporter of big contours, but i belong to some of the military experts who believe that only small steps and refining their military potential are correct . in the direction of mr. petren, please tell me if this is true or if this is true with er such information that i saw the other day about the fact that currently russia

has thrown into battle precisely in these er in this er direction of my so-called second army of the world, i think so, i think that this is true in them let us again let us look at the world through their eyes again, they must have, i want some kind of victory, they must , whether we want it or not, and for this and for the sake of this victory, they will throw absolutely all possible resources that have at this moment i will conduct such a very interesting technical detail for this moment they have already been involved in this war and this equipment entered the territory of ukraine so-called heavy tank support vehicles terminator who will be interested in of our viewers will definitely find this information on google, why is it important, because it is the

newest armored vehicle that exists in nature for the destruction of manpower, and there are only 10 machines of them, only 10 machines. this was developed in 2011 , and in fact it is quite technological and high- quality, it has two heavy guns of 2a42 caliber through 30 mm, two heavy grenades, a grenade launcher of 40 mm caliber , what does this mean in simple language, translating it into an accessible language, they are running out of a serious military stockpile of technological weapons, and your question is it is absolutely correct that they will throw all their forces as such to reach the administrative borders of the declared regions and we have no other choice but to concentrate all our will into our fists and tirelessly defend ourselves every day mr. petros please tell me if i understand the tactics

of our military leadership correctly now and the political leadership that is still going on right now, it is not the only one, it is not a one -time process of re-arming with nato weapons. we have to restrain the enemy as much as possible, but at the same time, our protect the maximum equipment, that is, the main thing now is that there are no breakthroughs in the boilers, and so on - wait for what was more modern western weapons. yes , this is the right tactic. we have to be afraid, we have learned to fight, we have already received quite a large amount of a wide variety of equipment. let's be honest , if it were not for the enlaves and non-negotiables and the so-called road war that boiled over in the north

of ukraine, in particular in the kyiv region, it would be continuous well, it's true. well, after all, the second country in the world at that time threw a military challenge to us, and in terms of human potential, we are not commensurate with each other, that's right. well, today is today. yes, it's a communication day in our studio. but now i think, eh, peter chernyk will return and we will continue because there are still questions. it is interesting, actually. by the way, i don’t like it very much when it starts with me and the second army of the world. that was the linden army of the world. i wrote that from the first days yuriy butusov i want to ask peter about this tactic of the russians, yes, cannon fodder, you just noticed that they have an advantage in weapons, but

more advantages, for sure, in er, well, in terms of living resources, what do they have? us er to the front but how much this tactic is really used by the aggressor, i.e. the tactic of ma- mass yes they have always fought and how effective it is and er how difficult this tactic is for our er military who oppose on the entire front so-and-so so-and-so nawali it is days it their historical tactics have always been like that, in the end i like to use historical examples of the second world war, primarily on the soviet union, what did he do sorry for such a bad word, he filled all the german lines with meat, the best indicators of that are yes let's say the so-called dnipro operation when they stormed kyiv and brodivskyi cauldron, if you

carefully read the enemy, that is, read the memoirs of german officers, they wrote very simply, the human shaft was so high that we did not have time to reload the machine gun tapes this is despite the fact that they had a sufficient amount of ammunition, this is their eternal tactic, probably since the time of the tatar-mongol invasion, which they are actually the heirs of in the political, ideological and geopolitical sense, and they still use this tactic. and now i do not want to conduct a specific section with fro there are such cases where do they inflict serious damage to the mouth , that is, the mouth is completely covered, it is more than 100 people, and they literally after a few hours, in the same direction again send years and so on for several times, namely less chernobaivka well, i think there is no need to tell about it, and now it is the moment of the snake, everything is known about it, is it still

effective? yes, it has a certain coefficient of usefulness. can we act on each other in the same way ? we do not need a pyrrhic victory. unfortunately, there is some expert field that believes that ukrainians should concentrate all their life force, which is only possible, and liberate donbas with large counteroffensive actions. theoretically, it is possible, but it is necessary to put hundreds thousands of people, i personally am an expert as a citizen, categorically against such a scenario, we will move slowly, we will move confidently but effectively, sublimating my own words, i will say that in my opinion, the combat situation looks like in particular, it is a struggle between the number of our enemy and the quality, which on our part is increasing, and sooner or later this the quality will pass - it will move to the phase that will help

us get the final victory, but i have said, i am saying and i will continue to say, this path will be long, mr. petro, what i wanted to ask, of course, is about crimea and the issue of crimea. on the agenda again, the president is talking about it, well, everyone is talking about crimea. what is your opinion about the liberation of crimea? i am not talking about the deadline now. of course, it depends on the strength, simply on the capacity of the weapons, on the political will , etc. options methods should be preferred in this case ukrainian, but i don't know if we could do it , but i only remember the second winter campaign there, when it was successful, it was a very difficult passage all the way to simferopol, look, in my opinion, it's not this is the first time i am being asked this question and i am crystallizing

my position, which is already known to the information space, we will be able to return crimea only by military means, there is no other way, this is true, but it is possible only when the russian state begins to crumble completely and as a person who has certain knowledge and experience not only in military affairs. and in geopolitics, there is no doubt that the russian final empire is on the way to its final collapse. at one moment they can fall for several decades. and there are cases that for several hundred years, and there is no need to be afraid of this, the point will come that the moscow state will inevitably collapse, fragment and die

. from crimea, it won't happen quickly, it could be in a year, it could be in five, or it could be in 10, so in my opinion , any rhetoric that we are quickly and qualitatively beating the enemy from crimea already in this war is false well, that is, you have to look at the development of events, it just changes in real time, that's why forecasts, of course, they still interfere with unnecessary things when you are there, especially about the term, they tell us that they are guessing fried, not grandmothers, there are some soothsayers, i want to ask you strategically about the end of russia, what he is irreversible, i have no sums, like all of us, that is, it is an absolute evil that must be punished, but there are already such opinions that the democratic new russia must be preserved. lithuanians don't destroy the soviet union, gorbachev is good, etc. and they allude to that, many russians allude to the fact that it is not necessary to preserve

russia as a great power, to leave its nuclear weapons there so that it can be a counterweight on the western side of china. and what do you think about the disarmament of russia about the disintegration of russia after the victory of ukraine how it should be means my personal view is big big as it is now in what form is it even more than 17 million square kilometers of democratic russia is impossible in principle and in essence, so far they have two main bugs, the nuclear bug, that is, they scare the whole world with a nuclear disaster, and the second resource yellow , that is, first of all, the thermal resources of amet and gas are thermal resources of surcharge, they are impossible as a democratic state, this will not happen. why 100% sure. e strategic, ideological, cultural, mental russian imperative does not know

democracy as a phenomenon, in my opinion, starting with the last rurik ivan iv the so-called grozny and up to the present, they had a total of two in history relatively short democratic periods, these are the times of kerrinsky, when this soviet died, and before the arrival of the bolsheviks in october 17th, there was a conditionally democratic government for a full 8 months and the yeltsin era . we know very well how it all ended, that is, there is no nightly mental tradition in the legs and psychology in their political culture, such a phenomenon is the object of democracy. and as long as these gigantic resources, which they have, itagen territory and nuclear weapons , are in their hands, in my opinion, any democrats-democratization of this entity is impossible in essence, the solution to this problem is unambiguous where fragmentation and extraction of the nuclear sting but at the same time we have to be realists again we have

to be realists the sharp decline of the russian state today is clearly very strong and resource- strengthening china as long as those big groups, first of all the united states and europe will not find mechanisms how to confront china in the real way and those mechanisms at the moment are exclusively on the export function and on the philosophical on the philosophical understanding of the aftermath of a sharp collapse and defragmentation in the end, russia would not exist if there was no tomorrow the day after tomorrow, a year later, our only formula for survival is to learn to fight and finally become a full-fledged military state in the common sense of the word, let's say how it is in israel, i think you understood the example and you don't need to decipher it. thank you, mr. e petro bij thank you for joining our program with such a sober mind thank you a-a now we are in

touch our radio in cherkassk e-e a deputy of the city council of dnipro volunteer and now a fighter pshere good day oh we see we see and you can hear us normally everything is normal to rebuke and something is like that, i don’t see how it looks here at all i am very glad to see you again here i was a deputy in the past in that meeting and now i am an officer of the ukrainian army well we know this well i just remembered who you were and who you are now there is uh and uh, i want to ask about something other than the army. i understand that right now you can't say where you are, you're doing nothing.

ukrainian european truth is common as in the answer to the article in the new york times and do you read the junior times articles, where their editorial board strangely suggested that ukraine is capable of actually surrendering, that is, giving up part of the territory to satisfy putin, did you read it or not, and fortunately , now i have a lot of work and i am not a fool i have time to read in us, now we need to liberate our country, so they can keep these proposals to themselves the reaction to the test - the reaction of the ukrainian fighter to these ideas in new york about us, they decide for us there something. they can decide for themselves how to live there in new york. we are very grateful to the united states for their help, and for that, it is the power

behind which putin's ears stick out. as a person from the crimea, er, in fact, our fellow countryman, er, where is he, in fact, and is he , er, what do you see, er, on which, what actions should the state take, i don’t mean only there , the military, the military, some things, but simply in in principle , what should we do now to bring the liberation of crimea closer by any means? and which way are you personally? you see how much, my opinion has never changed, but i believe that after our victory, not a separate republic, but to regain autonomy, like the crimean qatari autonomy, because it

will be historically fair and politically very well, it will be justified, so go back there again the russian peace will not come that will protect the russians there, who seem to be oppressed there, actually one of the arguments of russia is that sevastopol is the city of russian glory, that the crimea has always been russian there. well, we know that in fact it was not at all 200 years ago russian warfare, they are not so much in the historical sense. in the plan, they have a big uh distance of time, that is, sevastopol is there for 200 or

so years, all of which from what fear did it become russian then they conquered it well, that was then and then there was independent ukraine and crimea was ukrainian and remains ukrainian and there cannot be any territory there, not any autonomy there and so on. they don't have their own the land, all the territories are captured by them, and this whole state is built on blood, and i understand all of this very well, and those peoples who are now part of the republics that are part of the russian federation

will give birth to their e-e republics have been looted for 100 years as such a state is not maybe it shouldn't exist, because all these resources of this state are directed only to terrorism, to murder, to threats, to blackmail, by the way, this is a very interesting moment, indeed, people who study, in particular, folklore, slavic folklore, and for example there from abroad who wanted to study at one time, for example, a russian cameraman - this is a very interesting story, uh, they are faced with the fact that this folklore dates back to the 19th century, and it all ends, like from there, we begin . america, i apologize for the american city in which i was born and grew up 2.5 thousand years ago. the city of feodosiya, which became russian because it was scared, because it was de-parked in its

time, the crimean tarsk was beaten , brutally killed, tortured, the date of people for that to fill and now we must restore this historical justice again to us we must return to crimea and we must return the crimea to the people who lived there listen i want to ask this well the situation at the front is very tense we understand it we follow it we read yurii butusova and other people who know what is going on. i want to ask, without details , about your mood, about how much of a beast there is, the russians are trying to do something, and hmm, what

do the citizens of ukraine think about this, what are you doing now hear well, look, my friend, if you look at this war , it is half-completely, it is completely depicted with the second world war, those things that are russians, their troops well , although they cannot, well, they cannot be called military, they are not troops, this is the horde, this is the horde that destroys people, destroys it on the land of the city, what they will buy is beyond the limits of any human humanity, human understanding, that's how you can look at what's happening. yes, war is very uh, uh, uh, such a measure is very complicated, yes. well, i

'm sorry, it's complicated, it's complicated . protection when we sometimes we advance, sometimes we retreat and er people's moods are different, but all those cities that are now under er occupation because of the orcs they will be liberated and crimea will be liberated and we will definitely return, this is not only my mood, but it is the mood of this of ours of our armed forces. we must protect our sister. we must rebuild what they did here, and it must be peremknelyuk and exist in the world. thank you . it consists in the fact that it is primarily for

the armed forces of ukraine to decide and their role is not simple. mainly, it is the only one that we should keep in mind. thank you for watching our program . thank you . i worked with you today, and where can i go to baieva? andriy saichuk, you watch espresso, but now we just switch to the news. if i understand correctly, we switch to the news and anna eva melnyk takes over in our broadcast relay. but after a short pause, i will say goodbye to you. pa pa u we are doing well foam in ukraine the main topic for ukrainians is victory and