tv [untitled] May 26, 2022 1:00am-1:30am EEST
1:00 am
the city, but for me it is more beautiful. one day my country was attacked by russia, but we were lucky and my mother and i went to poland. i like poland, but i want to go home. i have a lot of friends in kindergarten. i really want to go home and i will come back soon. i'll be back i'll be back i'll be back i'll be back i'll be back i 'll be back i'll be back
1:01 am
news together we are strong rebuild before launch we will win that you are not news together we are strong beyond human capabilities despite the constant attempts of the enemy to hinder us we continue to rescue help demine live more never have we felt such strong support around the world our european colleagues leading companies simple rescuers provide take in women and children for help, give their fire engines and equipment, so that our country overcomes not only the enemies, but also the consequences of every cynical attack on peaceful cities and towns we will win because the truth and our native land are behind us, we would be of good will when your task is to lead the country to victory this is the business of my
1:02 am
life, you do everything in your power for this, we approach this issue very, very specifically, we congratulate general valery zaluzhny the lives of our ukrainian citizens are the highest value under his wise command, making it possible for people to consume the armed forces of ukraine are destroying the second army of the world. i want to ask our people to believe in tin and believe in the armed forces glory to ukraine heroes glory to ukraine younger than their children ... they want to return home victorious as soon as possible!"
1:03 am
1:04 am
protection of ukraine delivery for independence, glory to ukraine , we will fight, we will resettle, we will win, daily news together we are strong marathon, the only news, the baton has now been picked up by the social media team with you yevgenia agarko in and we are holding the information front together with most of the leading tv channels of ukraine, in fact, it is already the 91st - the day of the full-scale current war. after the war in ukraine, the number of those who support giving civilians the right to own firearms and ammunition increased more than twice, or did the statistics increase compared to previous years? and why citizens believe that this is the right decision, let's
1:05 am
1:06 am
opponents of creating conditions for the free purchase of firearms well, now we will discuss this topic in more detail. vadym denysenko, adviser to the minister of internal affairs, joins our broadcast vadim, ah, i congratulate you, let's go ahead. i want you to comment on these numbers that we have seen now, because we know that the minister of internal affairs directly addressed the ukrainians, he addresses in the appendix action who wants to vote and give an answer to this question, that is, your department, it now wants to get certain such numbers here, why was the decision made to conduct a survey again, yes, and what will we come to if the majority of ukrainians say that ukrainians need weapons if there is such a decision
1:07 am
it was decided when to wait for him, look, in principle, on the first day of the war, the ministry of internal affairs made a decision that 20,000 tables should be distributed in the city of kyiv only in the city of kyiv in order to score and protect ukraine and in fact in many respects, this word is hoped to have given certain, let's say, moral advantages to the ukrainians, and besides everything else, it has become something that is definitely not decisive, but one of the important moments when morally we the system of ukraine therefore from this point of view the ministry of internal affairs really came that day to a certain rubicon of such and such numbers that we now see when a large number of people changed their point of view from the fact that there is no
1:08 am
need to have such a thing that needs to be legalized weapons, in fact, these three months of war. they showed that people are ready for what is needed, a certain legalization of weapons. why, in principle, does the ministry ask people because they understood that weapons are weapons here. there are some here. i don’t even want to give any away . uh, further discussions look, but you correctly explained that a weapon is a weapon, but let's do it now, before making any decisions, start thinking about the consequences. we remember the discussions that took place in the last few years. we remember the risks . we remember the war in the donbass and the risks of the influx of these weapons, how now, we will control this. well, in principle, the bill on the legalization of weapons has been adopted by the verkhovna rada in the first reading, and now it is being prepared for the second
1:09 am
reading precisely because i wanted to say exactly that now we need a big discussion in society, well, since the discussion is now possible in russian moments, uh, in several directions, the first and most important is whether it is necessary or not. now the majority is already talking about what is needed, the second direction is how to legalize uh, what to legalize and what should be the restrictions here, in fact, now there are quite large discussions, uh, conversation, you are still sitting, discussion, you are still sitting, definitely close the columns of things between people who really understand eh and international experience and understand the consequences that will come after the war, because we want it or not, but about the fact that after that they went and gave weapons insanely. of course, in principle , a large number of weapons will remain on hand, obviously, after all, we need to get everything in the right legal direction, and in order to er
1:10 am
avoid, first of all, avoid er, mass problems that appear in all parts of the world where similar responses occur, where warriors occur, this is primarily er organized banditry organized by armed processes what we know from the film about a black cat, mystical changes, that is, in reality, whether we want it or not, but such things already now, we are starting to count on the ministry and already now we must understand that there will still be in our society our task is to absolutely minimize these moments and at the same time, you need to give people the opportunity to understand that if you already have a meeting, you know how to use it, you are an adequate person. well, there are no psychos, so you know that thanks to the protection you reduce the amount of nitrogen why therefore that all over the world, it really shows that
1:11 am
society is ready for this, if there is a large number of people trained with weapons, the number of crimes in these moments can decrease dramatically, so in fact, we have to go through now without a whole lot of trouble, find this middle ground between well, let's say it's a chaos of people so far, this will definitely happen, and on the other hand, it will absolutely be a limitation, which in fact will not be any more . mentioned several interesting points that i want to discuss with you. yes, let's start, well, at least you said that in countries where weapons are legalized , ah, well, they, well, somehow, yes, we see improvements in security measures there, and so on . that happened the day before in the usa with a school like 20 eh how many there are 20 children and people there teachers have died and hmm here it
1:12 am
is really debatable if i may allow it and if i will answer you right away to zolotaya with what language during the last year there were two eh very large cases in in a country where weapons are prohibited, it is er and they say that the ukrainians shot a technical student, and now i can't remember from memory, but about 10 er. this is the story, and there was a similar story in one of the places of the central russian federation, the central er, the central regions of the russian federation, that is. actually, such things do not depend on whether the weapon is legalized or not, that is, the boy took his father's weapon and went on to shoot . in this case, i still believe that what we
1:13 am
are talking about is the level of security and the level of the number of crimes related to people who have registered legal weapons about these relevant open checks regularly, it is actually much less than the society where it is said that all weapons are prohibited, and then these weapons were found somewhere. look, you remembered the moment that we may now have a large number of illegal weapons. we understand this very well, and i think you yourself imagine that how easy it is now to find a weapon somewhere by accident, even so, in the liberated territories, in particular, anywhere, a field, a forest, where the russian so-called military were there, so do you think there can be a certain legalization of such a weapon, if a person found it, did he contact the ministry of internal affairs is he angry and wants to take it
1:14 am
upon himself to meet? let's talk about international experience, that is, in principle, the corresponding processes are taking place all over the world and, in fact, if the state is smart enough. the question is if the state does it on one side. strict restrictions and says that we will enter you, you will have serious problems. if you give up just like that, you will have nothing and you will be fine. in fact, in many countries of the world, this balance can be maintained and these issues can be solved, so from my point of view from the point of view, it will be very important to adopt the correct law in the second reading, i say that i have already adopted the law on the legalization of weapons, so that before the second reading, it will be properly finalized and, accordingly , by-laws will be adopted, that is, what adopts the cabinet of ministers and, on average, the ministry of
1:15 am
internal affairs, so i think that from this point of view , you can't rush here and these things would be if we work on this, taking into account the international court of justice, i think that all these are things that we can solve relatively for society and mr. vadim, i want to ask you two questions, but we don’t have much time left, so i’ll ask you briefly, the first question, yes, regarding the handing in of weapons, tell me whether there were any now, or whether the ministry of internal affairs is conducting measures to deal with such cases where the population regularly hands in some kind of illegal weapon or conduct you have such measures and how many weapons have been surrendered, if carried out, it was established now. as far as i understand, such measures have recently been carried out. well, in this case, i do not know what he is conducting, so it was not carried out, but before the war, such things were carried out from time to time , such things were carried out and people really surrendered that is, in principle, if people understand what
1:16 am
legalization is, in principle, people become another important point, so i would like to hear your opinion, how does the ministry of internal affairs look at the legalization of weapons, precisely according to the classification, yes, for the population, what would be possible to allow a person to legalize it is a pistol, an automatic carbine, just a hunting rifle, some kind of hunting weapon is allowed, but in this case, i would frankly, i would very much like the legislator to determine what is possible, because there is a country in which everything and where there are also some global problems, that is, common sense is needed in this case, there is a big discussion now, i would not answer this question. that is exactly why and accordingly they are doing these respective e-e surveys and so on and so on and so on the verkhovna rada should to adopt the relevant law, and then it is time for the ministry of internal affairs to adopt by-laws, so it is good here, the principle of common sense is to cut off
1:17 am
everything that is necessary from oneself, and in this way we reached some kind of more or less normal, healthy compromise, we heard you, thank you very much for your opinion for clarification vadym denysenko, and the advisor to the minister of internal affairs was in touch with us, so they actually discussed the possibility of legalizing weapons, how does the ministry of internal affairs look at it, well, now it's like that, i want to actually have this conversation, and we will join it of the deputy director of the sociological group rating of lyubomyr mysev yes, mr. lyubomyr, we congratulate you , your agency actually conducted this survey regarding the legalization of weapons, eh. i want to understand the first question itself, eh, it sounds like this the active phase of the war should be considered objective and representative, because you understand the mood of the people and the situation that is developing
1:18 am
throughout ukraine. in turn, this reflects the mood of people who are in a certain stressful situation, but if we talk about us in general, the experience that we have during the first day, in fact, of conducting uh, until the day of the full-scale invasion of russia, we conduct surveys, and actually they help to understand the situation which is formed in society. yes, we see the growth of many indicators. there are certain questions about representativeness, since in this case there is a movement of people in e-e in the regions, but this is because the sample is primarily random. is confirmed by many or mediated indicators, we can say that these are the actual opinions of people during the war, it is clear that they will differ from peacetime. and in which
1:19 am
regions was the survey conducted and in what way? all residents who now have a mobile connection were actually covered by this survey. well, these are all the regions where it is more or less calm, of course there are big problems with accessibility in the regions where they are held active hostilities, these are the regions of donbass in the first place and that is why we are now talking about the fact that this is a survey that represents the opinions of people in the territory where there is mobile communication in ukraine. survey or this is your initiative and this initiative is ours. there is also a customer for this survey and a
1:20 am
public initiative ukrainian arsenal of freedom . actually, they are engaged in the issue of er study of opinions and the issue of er let's say popularization of ownership of firearms among the population in ukraine well , let's generally analyze the numbers over the years, er, as a whole, if you have them somewhere with you, or at least from memory, how did these numbers change? if we take a-a similar surveys there was still a war there, for example, in donbas and until february 24 of this year, as far as you know, they were growing, the dead were stable, if you remember. let 's analyze, so we can do a fairly long analysis of the dynamics. we have data starting from 2014, the question was asked e- usually in one wording of how citizens support the rules of
1:21 am
granting citizens of ukraine the right to own firearms, in essence this issue will be debatable if we remember in general in society and before the start of the full headquarters invasion, it did not have much support among the population, to be specific according to the numbers, three quarters of the population were against such an initiative and a quarter of the population supported it. who were these quarters of the population? they were mostly wealthy people. they were residents of the center and the west. that is, those who wanted would protect either his property or what he had in the oblast. this was protection if we were talking about the protection of the property of the other party. these were more or less responsible people who wanted to own and know how to use these firearms. they were, let's say, poorer. well, it is very interesting that quite often the residents of the east and south, that is, those regions that were close to hostilities, actually this trend is also
1:22 am
observed and according to new data, it is a full-scale invasion, of course in this situation opinions have changed dramatically and the support for the granting of the right, that is, we are talking about the expansion of the right to own firearms has increased dramatically. and 39% of those who do not support this idea. but we cannot say that everything is so clear-cut, that is, that it is necessary to start arming people and give them the right to go to the store and buy a fire extinguisher. at the same time , society has, shall we say, certain reservations about of this issue, if we are talking about support for this initiative, we are also talking about the fact that people are not opposed to the adult population of ukraine having skills in the possession of firearms, that this will also contribute to the country's defense capabilities, on the other hand, there are, let's say,
1:23 am
certain fears about the growth of criminal activities in the country the spread of illegal firearms circulation, especially after the end of hostilities, and there are also certain concerns about the violation of personal rights if, for example, there was someone near you armed people, and you with the same weapons will not be there , well, that is, we are now talking about, let's say, the fear of the growth of criminogenic situations, so if we talk further about the development of this trend in general, then against the background of hostilities, let's say war in the country, a question about that in order to protect oneself from exists on the other hand, for now, it requires a certain development of the culture in general, the spread and use of firearms and, first of all, compliance with the law in this area. me how now, please tell me if we talk about
1:24 am
the second situation before uh-uh until 2014 until 2013, how much was the correlation with what happened after the 14th year well, unfortunately, we do not have such data and what would reflected the situation before the 14th year, but we can assume that they were not particularly different because, uh, if the trend was different, well, in the 14th year, only 13% supported the idea. that is, this is an insignificant number of the population , so before that, let's talk about the events with the annexation of crimea. and the situation is not in donbas. i don't think that were very different now. since we have a full-scale invasion, we have so much, let's say, well, first of all, it is connected with what happened in buch and in irpen and in other cities, it is now happening with the population, that is, this is the public,
1:25 am
we are talking about specific moments about the specific time, yes, this is important, that's why i asked you in the first question, yes, about representativeness and objectivity, the same time, but we have already heard the answer. i thank you very much for and for the survey and for the answers that joined us this evening explained this survey thank you very much lyubomyr mysiv deputy director of the sociological group rating was in touch with us we are moving on we will come back literally in a moment we will bandage it up we will win daily news together we are strong unconquered cities of ukraine it is cozy kherson pearl of protected areas of ukraine the city played a significant role in the creation of statehood, it became the southern center of the ukrainian revival during the great terror, the nkvds shot
1:26 am
almost 2,000 people for nationalism, and the kherson leadership of the oun, led by bohdan bandera, actively fought against the german invaders, because an angry kherson native will go bare-handed against the enemy column, but he will not bow down to the occupier kherson unconquered when your task is to lead the country to victory, this matter of my life, you do everything in your power for this, we approach this issue very, very specifically, we congratulate general valery the hardworking life of our ukrainian citizens is the highest value under his wise command, making it impossible for a person to consume the armed forces of ukraine destroy the second army of the world i want to ask our people to believe in the alkaline and believe in the armed forces of ukraine, glory to the heroes, glory to
1:27 am
ukraine, every vyshyvanka is a symbol of the indomitability and revival of ukraine, we will heal our wounds, we will decorate the scars with flowers, ukrainian destiny will blossom again like poppies in the field, ukraine will embroider the renaissance, strong, unbreakable, free three months of fearless struggle of ukrainians and europe together with us in the resistance, on may 29 the second international charity telethon save ukraine will be held live in the heart of freedom kyiv and in the german capital berlin world leaders and ukrainian stars call for peace and collect funds to help
1:28 am
ukraine the heart of freedom must fight harder together we will definitely win glory to ukraine is the support of the ministry of culture and the ministry of foreign affairs of ukraine watch live on the leading channels of ukraine and online charity marathon save ukraine may 29 at 9:00 p.m. we will convince with paraplay we will win daily news together we are strong well why do we continue telephoning the only news no agarka with you and we will continue like this after the war unleashed against ukraine russia not only ceased to be a reliable partner for business, it has ceased to be a partner at all, prime minister denys myhal emphasized this as part of the dialogue, this is for ukraine, which took place within the framework of the world economic forum. the prime minister's
1:29 am
full speech was successful. mr. president of the world economic forum, dear distinguished participants of today's meeting, i am pleased to welcome you all today to this distinguished gathering. thank you to the organizers of the world economic forum for this platform that you gave to ukraine today or our voice sounded even more powerful, the full-scale war that russia unleashed on february 24 against ukraine will in many ways become a new reference point in world history. russia has not just ceased to be a reliable partner, it has ceased to be a partner at all. this is the enemy of the free world and the peace of the whole of europe and the whole world. we all have to realize that the business
1:30 am
relationship with russia was closed many years ago. international companies that for some reason still work in russia finance the war budget, exit this market and stop working there completely, now your taxes there are turning into bullets and shells and bombs that fly into ukrainian people and in ukrainian cities, hundreds of companies have already taken a clear position and left of the russian market. of course, in the short term this means losses, but those who decided to stay there now will lose much more. today's world puts large and responsible international corporations before the choice of working in
14 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
Espreso TVUploaded by TV Archive on
![](http://athena.archive.org/0.gif?kind=track_js&track_js_case=control&cache_bust=1383258648)