open a petition for the return to the digital air of the ukrainian tv channels espresso of the fifth and direct press the button to sign the petition an inscription will appear signed your signature is confirmed and taken into account let's return the ukrainian patriotic channels to the digital air together we will not allow freedom of speech to be destroyed in ukraine it is very important in this difficult time to be aware of what is happening, we tell the news and help to understand the events, however, the war can make its adjustments in the event that the broadcast signal is lost, see espresso on satellite now espresso has become available at once on two satellites if you don't have a satellite dish and the broadcast signal has never appeared search for espresso on the internet our youtube channel espresso

ukrainian view thank you for watching glory to ukraine this is a program verdict my name is serhiy rudenko good day everyone and good health, today is the 92nd day of ukrainian resistance to the russian occupation in the eastern regions of russia, the invaders are trying to attack the villages and launch rocket-bomb attacks in the places of the sick prevails in equipment and the number of soldiers at the same time the russian federation continues to lose manpower and equipment since the beginning of the great war the russians have already lost in ukraine 29,600 personnel tanks 1315 units of armored fighting vehicles 3232 units of artillery systems 617 rocket launchers 201 means of anti- air defense 93 aircraft 206 helicopters 170

vehicles 2,225 units of boats boats 13 cruise missiles 114 drones two units of special equipment 47 units about the attempt russification of ukraine by putin about poroshenko's case summoning yatsenyuk turchynov and avakov to the sbu today we will speak for the next hour with the people's deputy of ukraine for european solidarity mykola knyazhytskyi p. mykolai good health to you congratulations so on may 23, the security service of ukraine released a video of the testimony of the people's deputy from the opcw viktor medvedchuk, who stated that the illegal seizure of a section of the state oil pipeline by prykarpattia zahidtrans and the illegal scheme of trade in ordlo coal took place directly with the participation of the former president of ukraine, the fifth president of ukraine and former

high-ranking officials, poroshenko's lawyer ihor golovan stated that the words of putin's best man, viktor medvedchuk, about poroshenko's involvement in the neza scheme of coal trading and the sale of the pipeline are not true. since the war, poroshenko himself spoke about what we need everyone should unite to bury the ax of war and finally, all those misunderstandings that existed before the war should be put aside, who is now tearing the ax from the earth with an ax of war and what they want to do with this ax, well, from my point of view , this is a story that compromises zelenskyi himself, because fighting against political opponents in conditions of war, when political opponents are not fighting against you, looks at least unreasonable, what should a strong president do, he should call all in the conditions of war, the representatives of the government and the opposition all and say let

's unite let's you have in your factions among your supporters there are people who have different views, but these are people who, just like me, love ukraine and they want to defend it, let's all fight together, who is at the front, who is in the military headquarters, who is in the information defense headquarters, let's distribute responsibilities and unite all the best people from all political forces, if zelensky did that, then his leadership, which he still has, is quite high rating, it would be simply unquestionable, instead, someone decided to lower zelenskyi, that is, show to turn zelenskyi into such a petty brawler who pulls out of the closet a teddy bear who once lashed out at stus, who is not trusted at all and who uh and who they are asking to quarrel with poroshenko, but medvedchuk is such a person who always works for the government, he once worked for the soviet government when he destroyed stus , then he worked for kuchma, then he worked for

yanukovych, eh, i think he tried to adapt to poroshenko and somehow got in. now he has completely adapted to zelenskyi and in principle he is talking about what zelensky wants. well, of course you can say that his tv channels were really closed there. well, his business is booming and not all tv channels closed channel 1+1. he continues to be its shareholder, that is, of course he is. he is in prison because he is in prison, well, he probably wants to have good conditions there, he probably wants to be released from there and the authorities say to him, but now poroshenko has quarreled and we say write the text with pleasure and here he reads from the prompter this text that was written for him in which there is no trust uh and vlada thinks she is happy the problem is that when the large-scale invasion uh first started vlada went through different stages at first there was fear then there was confidence because they saw that all ukrainians are united

to defend our region zahidna supports and this is very positive confidence and not those positive confidences were an illusion that the elections will be held here already in june they wanted to announce about the elections today on ukrainian pravda there is a big article about it and for this reason the television channels were closed until they decided to do one marathons thought that we would win now unfortunately, the situation at the front is now difficult and the government spokesman arestovych says this and everyone can see that the situation is not easy in the donbas , ukrainians are dying well, after all, the russian aggressor and the nazis are a superpower, their sanctions may be relaxed a little one day, but everything they saved and the west still bought oil from them, and they are spending these funds on a war with us. therefore, it is now clear that the war is protracted, but probably the scenario was developed when they were thinking of holding elections and released this medvedchuk with his accusations against poroshenko, obviously this will not have any legal consequences because well, if poroshenko, like

any other citizen, is guilty, then the court will prove it, and the person, if he is guilty, must bear if the responsibility is innocent, then obviously it must be justified. but someone wanted to turn zelensky from a national leader into a caricature, someone wanted to return him to the past, and the initiators of this case released medvedchuk, thinking that they would harm poroshenko. and arsen avakov, oleksandr turchynov, and arseniy and yatsenyuk as witnesses, although the same yatsenyuk says that he has already been to the sbu three times. turchynov, who is at the front, says come to me in the trenches and i will give you testimony hm about this case about the coal case, including what does the sbu want in this case from avakov from yatsenyuk from turchynov or we understand that for zelensky for zelensky's team er petro poroshenko is sparring a partner in politics, if

zelensky himself will be zelensky without some kind of partner, well, maybe he won’t look like he could look, so it’s clear why they need poroshenko and why they constantly hang him up in order to whom they said poroshenko, but he did something else there. and avakov yatsenyuk and the turks. avakov was actually the minister of internal affairs for 2.5 years during zelenskyi's presidency, now suddenly he has some questions, some complaints, well, avakova just had a conflict with poroshenko and supported zelenskyi, he believes that it was arsen borisovych's mistake at that time, but he did it, but now he is perceived by zelensky as an enemy because it is his entourage who fought with the day, they survived him , and it is obvious that there is another very important aspect countries are ruled by certain elites who are united in political groups and factions. we once had yanukovych's elite. the so-called donetsk elite. we remember that

there was an elite that always supported yushchenko 's national-democratic forces. belonged to this elite in each of these ices, there were different people, some more positive and negative , more professional or not, but one way or another, it was an elite that relied on certain certain social strata. and here is zelensky, he essentially created a new elite, the party, the servant of the people, his entourage, yermak tymoshenko, everyone these people are the new elite that represented and represent such an intermediate version of ukrainian society. neither yours nor ours. what is the difference? you can call them differently, you can support them or be against them, but this is the new elite. and now this donetsk elite actually has no one. fled to moscow, the russian invasion was completely in any pro-russian mood for a certain time, i believe that for a long time and destroyed in ukraine, and we have two elites left, the national-democratic elite and the elite, such a difference, and here, er, i would er, or this person

the middle elite, if it is not insulting to call them that, and this struggle of one against the other, and these are the middle ones, they decided to destroy them, because er, turchynov and yatsenyuk, and how is it not surprising that avakov er belong to the national democratic elite, these are people who have always been or at first, with yurchenko, with tymoshenko, with poroshenko, they supported about ukrainian forces, about ukrainian laws, about the european movement, all this is part of how they can quarrel with each other, which is wrong, and poroshenko, but they belong to the same managerial elite, and these are those who are in power now they want to destroy their only competitor, compromise, destroy, again, from my point of view, this is a big mistake, because in a position of power, i would embrace them all and support them and show in a position of power what a strong manager is, but then you have to win in friendly competition, it is very difficult. well, why couldn't the same avakov lead some part there that is

responsible for internal heat yatsenyuk can't go to the west and negotiate help for ukraine with his connections and opportunities turchynov who organized ukrainian arms production cannot deal with this. turchynov is doing it. he went to the front . well, he answered very aptly. he said, come to me in the trenches, take evidence, but that’s normal. well, this is zelenskyi’s big mistake, because i don’t think that zelenskyi is there. an enemy of ukrainian statehood or ukrainian power, and such steps show him as an enemy of the ukrainian state and weaken it instead of strengthening it. well, it is not really clear why at this particular time, why poroshenko, why avakov, why yatsenyuk, why turchynov and why actually, they are not on one side of the barricade that zelensky built for himself because he is on one side of the barricade with the people because there is a people's war, but it turns out that zelensky still says that we are the same barricade, but your barricade is here to the right, mine

is here to the left well, for example, if they are really thinking about early parliamentary elections, perhaps early presidential elections, do you think it is appropriate for the president to keep zelenskyi 's promise not to run for a second presidential election the term because er, the period we are now observing zelenskyi, these three months, they testify to the fact that zelenskyi is becoming the leader and leader not only of ukraine, but also of europe and the world leader, and maybe drinking this status would be enough. well, why? to a person who has served one presidential term and fights with the russian federation, why should he think about a second term or recent parliamentary elections if it is clear that after our victory there will be a period of assimilation of western money, there will obviously be questions what about the expediency of using the effectiveness of using

m.m. do you think that zelensky should have stopped the noise of the term and actually give the country the opportunity to develop further well , first of all, as i see it now, after all, they are not thinking about early elections, but on the contrary for this parliament to work for the longest time, they have vlad, there is excellent support from the former psg, because the opzj was divided into two groups, one is boyko and lyovochkina, and the other is a group of dollar and medvedchuk, because they were partners of both of these groups cooperate with the authorities and i think that the testimony of medvedchuk was the testimony of this cooperation. both of these groups are now against them, the group that is most offended by them . as i understand igor kolomoisky for the future , because everything always depended on their votes for her to have a majority in the servant of the people, and now there is also the former psg, which will definitely be on the hook to fully vote with the word of the people, that is, they have no problems with the majority, and now it seems to me that they would like to hold out longer, because they see that the war is dragging on. unfortunately for all of us and

that's why i'm not telling the truth. fair elections. zelensky is a populist when he said that he was running for one time, obviously no. he couldn't guarantee that he was telling the truth and society will see it now. i would not have become him in this. every person should have the right to watch, even you and i, so clean, he is a real leader, look, he became a leader for the event, he performed his function very well . an actor and as an actor, he worked in who plays the president, he worked brilliantly, it's good that we have an army that fights and, well, they talk about zelenskyi, but zelenskyi, well, there is such a joke about him that they call him or he didn't run away like that that he would not have escaped as a hero, but it is actually very good that he stayed in the country, that he stayed in kyiv, that he started and continued to rule the country. it is

absolutely positive for the result that he now has the opportunity to really become a leader, but you know a leader, a good king is a merciful king leader - he is the one who knows how to unite around himself, that is why he is a leader, and the one who divides and creates his own gang is not a leader, and that is why he will be and then he will be doomed to defeat. therefore, it is the choice of zelensky himself, whether he or he or he or he will be removed altogether from politics , he is an ambitious person, he thinks that they are not going to do this, or he will lose, and the way he is being led now is the way to defeat, will he be able to become the one who will unite society? the way opzzh plays along because the former psg plays along with the team zelensky, at one time, after the revolution of dignity, a decision was made about lustration, about the fact that people who worked under yanukovych's regimes cannot hold positions, and this was a very important

decision , in fact. e now we see how the opzj faction is being renamed into another one in a lifetime, but these people really worked for putin two two opzz and these e pro-russian columns that they have always been pro-russian. i do not believe that war can radically to change or let's say reset to zero the experience that people had in this party and in medvedchuk's team, these people once again miked again for life or for what, for the future or for something else, is there a need after the war, after our victory, some the solution now, the ban is about pro-russian forces. do we need some kind of solution that would give an opportunity to sift, well, at least politicians, i don’t know journalists, also on the subject of where they were, how they worked or cooperated with pro-russian forces, or did they contribute to putin coming to ukraine?

because this is actually a quite serious decision, because we constantly discuss our colleagues who are in the only telethon who worked for medvedchuk, should they be in this telethon or shouldn't they say, well, the law allows us to do oleksandr tkachenko says about what we have every journalist on a special account, you are not on the account, that's why you are not there, it's not obvious , everyone who is ready is on the account, they will execute the sovereigns at will , and the problem with those journalists, i don't think that they were particularly pro-russian they obeyed the will of the one who paid them, but the government is always satisfied because he pays the government. now they do their will. it is much more convenient than working with independent people who need to be convinced of something. if you are talking about lustration, you know. i think that lustration came to us in the wrong way, then i

said about it because what does lustration mean? we forbade the deputy head of some district administration from working there, who was simply a minor official, never betrayed anyone, signed the budget and papers, and he cannot work, but a deputy who was yanukovych's right hand can be a deputy and influence politics. therefore, this imitation of lustration is largely real lustration would be if these people who politically supported anti-ukrainian forces and brought ukraine to the situation in which it is, did not have the right to engage in politics, this would be a real illustration. and now exactly the same is happening precisely because these people we simply forbade them, we did not forbid them to engage in pro-russian politics, we forbade them to be called opzzh, the difference is that they will be called something else and will do the

same thing, this means imitation, how can it be banned, well, constitutionally, it must be difficult to do, because every citizen has the right to elect and be elected, but if the government really wanted to distance itself from pro-russian forces, it should have said that we will never form coalitions with any of those who were pro-russian parties in our lives, and then they they will be in the minority all the time and then they will not influence anything, but the government says no, we need them. they should not support putin now. let them change the flag and support zelensky and we will continue to do everything together with them, that is, no responsibility for anything what these people did , either politicians or journalists well, journalists are a little bit different story of politics, first of all, in general, they do not bear the most important thing, they bear moral responsibility, what is moral responsibility , if these people said, you know, we were wrong

we were wrong, we saw now how high the price of our mistakes is, we are ready to atone and will never do what we did again, well, people are capable of making mistakes, i think that some people could forgive these people for their behavior, society, but they don't. and what do we have to repent of? ok well, we were forbidden to be called newsone there or zik or opzzh, now we will be called by other names which now we will keep quiet and then we will do all the same thing because the government allows us to do that, unfortunately, how does it look well, that's how i remember for example, yuriy boyk or nestor shufrych or vadim novinsky, and even oleksandr vilkul. although he is now there heroically defending kryvyi rih, but at least these people contributed to the fact that putin came to ukraine, i always have some kind of internal dissonance. because when i listen to yuriy boyk

who began to say something about what should be done during the war or something else after the war. i always remember this photo as they flew to dmitry kozak to the administration of the president of the russian federation and took pictures there in the reception room as they they went to them for peace and, let's say, they talked about the fact that ukraine does not want to make certain concessions there. i don't understand why these people are still in svoboda in the first place. i don't understand why they sit in the verkhovna rada, and even more so, i don't understand why e i have to live according to the laws that they vote for or that they initiate, this is the biggest dissonance that exists. well, look, i agree with you . vilkul is a slightly different story, because vilkul is really defending kryvyi rih now and has already repented so many times , repented and cursed the enemy. i i wouldn't doubt it. maybe he really is sincere. he has always been a good manager to the extent of adapting because he worked with yanukovych, but

he was a good manager, and now he is from the white side publicly, because all the others you named, they are sorry, they are not at the front, well, he cannot be a deputy at the front. but you can go to the soldiers, provide humanitarian aid, support them , speak out, condemn, so putin, whom you went to, they don’t do that, but vilkul does, so vilkul can be an example for others in me with there was one very interesting story about the wolf, so private . i remember that i was returning from a business trip, and before that we had a terrible quarrel with him on some broadcast, we discussed on may 9, we were obviously on opposite sides, i didn't even recognize him, he approached me at the vienna airport, we said hello he says, you know, i want to tell you that in fact i am much bigger and yours is of the same mind than you think. well, i just have a different electorate and he and i had a debate there, but it's really a slightly different story in relation to other people. well, i didn't see them. i saw how they went abroad and returned heroically, but i didn't see that they went to the front, uh, you understand, just to support, even even, i'm

talking about bringing something, and just supporting the soldiers, to be with them, to understand what problems there are, to try to help these people with something, that's me unfortunately, i didn't see it, and that's why these people are ordinary, they 're just ordinary people who adapt, but by and large they're traitors. let's talk about what putin is already doing in the occupied territories, in particular in kherson oblast and partly in luhansk oblast and donetsk region, partly zaporizhzhia hmm, what is happening with the issuance of these passports, as they say, these two-headed chickens are dead, but uh, about one million such passports were issued to the horde, of course. their rights are somehow being violated, we will now protect them since yesterday, then he ordered to distribute passports to the residents of the

kherson region, and this means that kherson region and an obvious part of zaporizhia region, putin also wants to privatize or privatize in the same way as part of luhansk region and donetsk region, which means russian passports in the kherson region, this means that they will follow the path of the so-called lpr and dpr, or this part they are preparing for accession or to accession to the russian federation, or do they need it only in order to later manipulate and say, well, you see, we are there because there are our citizens and we must protect them. no, they understand that crimea will not survive without kherson oblast. that is why they need kherson oblast annex to crimea, they want to occupy this part, and it is obvious that they would like to build this bridge all the way from transnistria to moldova, and it is not for nothing that the west says that it is not necessary to help young guns. obviously, they would like to carry out their plan and destroy ukraine that

there would be no ukrainians because it is a genocide against ukrainians, what they are doing is obvious, how can they talk to ukrainians who do not exist, they can only talk to russians, they need to write that they are russian people, now they need to be told that this is part of the russian federations. therefore, this is a full-fledged big war of a huge country, and when we know, we laughed for a very long time that uh, this is the second second army in the world, we so easily beat the first, not easily, the second . and here where we are talking to you in this city , also in other cities of ukraine, they exist, we do not have such missiles, the war is protracted, it is difficult and difficult, simply because we are fighting for the preservation of ourselves , so we will show that we are sincerely much better than them, but they are a serious, very military power do not underestimate this it can't really be a long-term war, well, in addition to the military component, there is a very important informational component that the russian federation conducts in our territory, in particular in the same kherson region, because they turned off all ukrainian tv channels for the

access of citizens and residents of this region, e.e. internet providers have also been replaced by russian at the same time we see a single telethon well, we can evaluate it in different ways, of course, and talk about it because someone will say that espresso is not in a single telethon, so we somehow argue here our right. yes, we defend our right to participate in this telethon, but still, when we talk about the fact that russia's goal is to make its lying propaganda without an alternative, then we have to pay attention to and what we do on these territories can we, uh, in some way convey or technically ensure the signals of our tv channels in the territory of the kherson region can we speak and resist doing propaganda in europe, because this is also very important, many european journalists are starting to talk about me

i have also encountered this in the last few weeks, that they say that azov is fascists, it is nazis, and it is clear that this is a consequence of russian propaganda in europe. how do you evaluate the information policy of the state? we are not talking about the authorities, even the state during the war . i'll give you one example. did you hear about the speech of a certain ingraj, and zelensky's debate with him? well, here's what kissinger actually said, what zelensky disagreed with. in principle, i do not think that kissinger for some reason he was wrong there because well, during the last 30-40 years, all under the soviet union, uh, he drew some certain conclusions. well, i don't know why zelensky didn't like it. zelensky for some reason thought that someone i already said that we should give our territories to such a way to negotiate with the

russians, and i read a speech by a certain engineer kisinghir, in fact, by and large, he said that ukraine should be supported, but it cannot be turned into a war with russia, because it is a great power for european countries. this can be argued that no and that ukraine should go to the borders of the beginning of large-scale sorting zelenskyi says the same thing, but the russians presented it in such a way that kissinger said that we should make territorial concessions to russia, this was russian weed and even zelenskyi read it, not the ukrainian explanation of that what kissinger actually said , and you don’t even understand the quote of scyfir , that is, russian propaganda works even on zelensky himself. invasion, arestovych and

several other spokesmen appeared there, and maybe it was necessary to unite people and give them hope, but then people need to talk with nadia, present the truth and have a tool for this, a single telegram, a telethon under the guise of war was created not in order to perform some functions for the defense of the country and in order to quickly monopolize all information and prepare for the elections, which were planned to be announced in the fall already in june, and therefore it was necessary to throw out all political competitors, as the authorities considered and under as a pretext for the war to make one channel, but this one channel is not set on winning in the information war, because if the minister of culture sits and instead of defending our gains in the east, he personally reads well, he does not send a dark man as medvedchuk did, but he does exactly the same personally he reads uh layouts and tells which channel what to show, and he still has a bunch of other tasks , some of which he does very well, and he

spends his time on it, so it definitely won't help the information war. you see, i remember when we were still young journalists with oleksandr tkachenko and met with him and khrystyna freeland , who was also a young journalist and worked in kyiv. they talked about freedom of the press and about ideals. and now sasha sits and edits the layouts of various oligarchic channels so that they will make fun of someone there and not mention someone here we mention the arrestee because he got bored here we scold poroshenko and we don't mention him here because he's good but he might be too popular well that's absurd it has nothing to do with the information struggle the information struggle is a serious job. when people unite, when a way is really created, it is not even for broadcasting, we did something russian-language there, together with other channels in poland, by using budget funds, inter ukraine seems like they are making some russian-language site, this does not spread our position in different languages, neither in europe, nor in the world, nor in ukraine, nor in russia, is in any

way affected by this throwing in