it is also the cradle of the cossack family of ukraine, which never knelt before anyone zaporizhia cossacks for centuries defended ukrainian lands from invaders during the liberation war zaporizhia army fought for independence for the entire country in the second world war, the city bravely withstood the soviet undermining of the dnieper and the german occupation and now zaporizhzhia full of the cossack spirit as always unyieldingly standing in defense of ukraine zaporizhzhia unconquered war in ukraine the main topic for ukrainians victories and losses analysis and forecasts politics and geopolitics

serhiy rudenko and the guests of his program will talk about all this people who have information and shape public opinion people who defend ukraine and create the future right now the main and interesting thing in the program is the verdict by serhiy rudenko from monday to thursday at 13:00, repeat at 21:00 : 30 on april 4, the rrt concert illegally turned off the digital airwaves of the ukrainian independent tv channels espresso the fifth and direct. on the website of the cabinet of ministers of ukraine, a petition was registered demanding the return to the digital airwaves of ukrainian tv channels to sign the petition first you need to register, it's very simple go to the website petition in you.gov.ua there go to the registration tab and enter all your data, say your phone number and email, confirm all your data,

enter the code that will be sent to your mobile, create a password will certify that you are not a robot, give consent to the processing of personal data, check all your data again and click the register button to complete the registration , go to your specified email where the letter will arrive of the site click on the link in the letter will return you to the petition site enter your email password enter we return to the main page of the petition site open the petition for the return to the digital air of ukrainian tv channels espresso of the fifth direct press the button to sign the petition an inscription will appear signed your signature is confirmed and taken into account we will return together on the digital air, ukrainian patriotic channels will not allow freedom of speech to be destroyed in ukraine, it is very important in this difficult time

to be aware of what is happening, we tell news and help to understand the events, however, the war can make its corrections if the broadcast signal is lost, watch espresso on the satellite now espresso has become available at once on two satellites, viewers who watch our channel on the astra satellite should readjust the tuner to the new parameters, because the old parameters will soon stop broadcasting espresso ukrainian view thank you for watching, welcome to the espresso channel, i'm igor shchycherin, where hanna valevska is with us and some sad news from the dnipro and on may 27, russian troops shelled the dnipropetrovsk region. today, the dnipropetrovsk region hit the national guard barracks in the dnipro district of dnipro. the regional defense center was informed by the head of the dnipro tourism defense center gennady korma korman on the air of the local

dnipro tv channel. according to korban, an iskander missile arrived at the national guard barracks in previously, 10 people were killed in the dnipro district, about 35 were wounded. korban clarifies that by order of the ministry of defense, the army cannot concentrate more than 20 people in one city in one place. i apologize , the rockets were launched from the rostov region, there were three rockets, one of which hit the target, such information will be clarified. for details , please contact us. health let 's talk about the latest sociology to what extent it is currently indicative and measurable and here, in particular, about the record optimism that ukrainians demonstrate despite the full-scale war with russia in the process i will now read the results of the e-e survey from the rating group - 76% of respondents expressed

confidence that the situation in ukraine will improve in the future, well, this is quite a high indicator. and even six months ago there were only 13% of such optimists, which affected the attitude of ukrainians to the future, despite the difficult the situation despite the war, we see a very indicative dynamic, mr. serhiy, what is the reason in your opinion, and you mentioned this indicator that the situation will improve, that is one of the indicators of my methods, and because of which it came to me you asked, you understand, first of all, to talk about why our indicators were very low, and before the war, and in general, this method is an idea that arose . as with many problems in our country, starting with corruption

and ending with, let's say, our judicial system does not work as people would like, and this has dragged on from year to year for decades, and also the division of society because of these quarrels between politicians, that is, such there is a rather negative fund, the attitude towards the authorities was um, there were spikes, we know when the spikes occurred during the maidan, but we always came to such social negativism, and already when the war began, why did the indicators increase, there are many indicators - this is one of them. i believe that the first after all, they played the role of expectations, that is, the majority of our population probably did not expect that the ukrainian army and the ukrainian state would be able to hold back against such a serious opponent as the russian federation, and all expectations were significantly exceeded, and because of this there was a surge of e-e according to

many social indicators, positivity serhiy and what does this mean that the situation in ukraine will improve in the future, there will be some kind of interpretation in the questionnaire, because i am quoting the latest information from the world bank there. a week ago, 10 days ago, they gave a macroeconomic forecast and here they are predict that the number of poor people in ukraine as a result of the war will increase by four times. well, the share of the poor population in the 22nd year is almost 4 times, that is, by the end of the year, the share of the poor may reach 70% population according to the standards of the world bank compared to the pre-war period, 18% is reported in recent reports on the impact of the war in ukraine on the economy of the countries of europe and central asia. please, this is the most common indicators for me. if we delve into specific indicators. such laws were not asked in each sphere, for example, in the economic sphere, because, well,

resources are simply limited in the polls, indeed, we all expect deterioration in certain spheres, but here it's about how we see our future in general . not in two months, let's say not in a year. in general, first of all, expectations about how the war will end play a significant role. that is, we expect victory is a victory. this is already a lot . of course, there are losses of various kinds. nature, including the economic one. but in this perspective, if we think about ukraine as a state, people expect that the situation will improve, this is what we are talking about and the difficulties. of course they will be ms. serhiy. well, then there are other questions or the country is moving in the right direction and regarding the improvement of the situation, it seems to me that you know the question. i'm just afraid that in three months, if god forbid, the economic is really 70%. because we are still wide

open, which we accumulated before the war, then sociology will continue to fall catastrophically , this is what i am leading to, so that in the future we will not be disappointed by the indicators that sociology will receive now, and in three months they will be completely different, with completely different indicators of course , now is such a turbulent transformation stage is happening because of the war and uh, these indicators are as of now and this is primarily a measurement of public opinion, you are talking about objective things that can influence these assessments, of course, from the decisions of the management, from how successfully the management will be able to solve problems, how successfully our the army will be able to deter and then go counteroffensive. during this period, public opinion depends, that is, everything depends on how the circumstances will develop.

the negative attitude towards the aggressor country, in principle, everything is clear, so no one like putin convinces ukrainians to be disappointed in the russian measure in the good russians, but who are these 2% of people who still have an attitude after three months of what we saw in this terrible war of russian aggression 2% of ukrainians who have a good attitude towards russia, who are they? and in the eastern regions, it seems that four percent have a good attitude there, if in terms of regional development, this is the result of a survey of the commission with them in general regarding those respondents who positively continue to evaluate the russian federation, let's say there are certain techniques, this is a methodical area, we are already addressing , there are certain methods of how to increase the participation of these

survey respondents, because this is also part of our society and it is necessary to somehow measure their opinions as accurately as possible, and now it is it becomes quite difficult because a person will understand that if she speaks favorably of russia during the war, then she is not in the trend at all. maybe these numbers can be a little even higher than two or four percent, but why do you ask these people exist, well, there is an older age group that still considers itself citizens of the former soviet union, then if we refer to the data of our institute monitoring, there are just a few percent of them in our society . here they can manifest themselves, that is, it is possible these are older people of the age group who seem to care and are ready to speak openly about it. of course, there are people who are under propaganda. they can also belong to this group, but it is necessary to understand that this is already a

marginal part of society, when in our there were maidans, there was also such a socio-political upheaval, but society remained divided, but now, when the war began, the absolute majority, and that’s 90% plus of people, they are on the same side, actually, it’s better to talk about this and that this unity uh, don't lose it, because ukrainian society is quite heterogeneous, that is, heterogeneous, and uh, here you are mentioning the problems, how would i like to say, when the war ends, we must not slide into such conflicts within the country that can destroy this unity to destroy simply well, i also gave my answer, i think that it could be members of a subversive group who were abandoned there, which well, this phone is not a survey, it is happening correctly, that is, the phone is calling us, or there are some hidden

agents of influence or direct agents or people who work there for years, there has been some kind of lack of cooperation and living here in ukraine, well , there are many such people, that's right, mr. serhiy. well, i don't think that there are many such people who are already ready, who will uh, answer, this is uh, she is a person. imagine there is a saboteur there. tell me and she will answer questions, she will reveal her position and her phone is recorded, although of course this is all anonymous, that is, this data is not passed on . it makes sense that they consider the aggression of russia to be correct. but there is such a number that we had saboteurs in the country who are directly included in the survey. when the answer is formed - i was joking.

would apply to citizens of ukraine if they were somewhere outside of ukraine, now they were not identified as citizens and there with a corresponding number and their phone number would be somewhere other than from a ukrainian number from some other . i think that the percentage would be not two and unfortunately, the higher one still needs to be followed well, for sure, we must assume that people now, even those who love russia, they do not say that they love russia, that is, there is a problem, a statistical error, i mean, well, of course, considering that the war there are limitations uh, regarding the quality of sociological polls, and we should wait for the end of the war to stabilize society and then we will be able to get more reliable data, but in any case, these data are important and indicative of that there are people there who love russia, but now here you are pointing out another opinion, i researched the issue of geopolitical

orientations for quite a long time, and here we have the only conditionally problematic region, two regions remained, the east and the south, but still it is not possible to show that the geopolitical orientation was dominant there, well positive towards russia, this is wrong, this is again such a diverse region in which transformations, perestroika, and this war took place, it will not push the majority of people who love russia, no, it will push those people who still had doubts, and there were many of them, the very goodness of ukrainian positions, this pro-ukrainian position will grow - this is 100% the last interview of the representative of the main intelligence department of the ministry of defense, vadym skibytsky. he gave radio svoboda his comments on the duration of the war and said that the president putin is ready to launch a long-term war against ukraine at least until the end of the 22nd year. well, and further quote, how long will the active phase be, it

will be the month of september, will it be october or will it be until the end of the year, it depends on our resistance and on the state of our defense forces against that of the help that is being given to us, many dates are currently given there, september, october. well, in general, skibitsky says that this war with russia may last longer than until the end of the year, but according to statistical indicators for the history of polls, it is possible for previous wars when war fatigue is setting in the population of the country that was attacked, that is, when the euphoria from the first successes subsides and people understand what i said churchill, i promise you that there is blood under there and a lot of work, honestly, i am not ready to comment on when, er, such a breakthrough may occur what can i say about this war in general, at the beginning, when we saw how our army was fighting, there was a

positive surge, and people thought that literally there would be a few weeks, a month, and everything would be over with our victory, but we see that the war drags on. that's it at the same time, the faith in the victory of the ukrainian army does not weaken. but the respondents are rethinking the time frame within which it will happen , that is, these frames are expanding, but faith does not disappear. i think that a lot will really depend on success on the battlefield and on other problems. about which we spoke of an economic nature and so on at at this stage, this is national stability from the point of view of public opinion, it is quite high because well, the price is high, people understand that we have faced, so i think that the margin of safety in this sensei we still have thank you mr. serhiy serhiy is dembit deputy director of the institute of sociology of the national academy of sciences of ukraine let's move on to the operational situation vadym denysenko advisor to the minister of

internal affairs is in touch with us vadym we congratulate you good day vadym that's why we started our broadcast with quoting information from mr. korban about the situation in the dnipro, where a russian scandal hit the barracks of the national guard and at least 10 people died and 35 were injured. maybe you have some additional information to this information and whether or not this is also disclosure of a certain military secret, isn't it too much, well , too much information is given by gennady kormak, who is the head of the dnipro secondary defense center, please well, in principle, i don't have any additional information here, that is, i can only confirm these numbers , unfortunately, unfortunately, a tragedy happened, the only question is, well, i didn't know that more than 20 people cannot be concentrated by order of the ministry of defense because the personnel the question is whether there was an air

alert declared in the dnipro at the time the missile hit and why there were so many casualties, see now, in principle, he is dealing with this issue, that is, for now, i do not have any more detailed information, then obviously, after all, it will be reported about it, as of now, this information is only what the carp said, where can you, in principle, repeat mr. vadim, let's do it then to the operational situation as of now, what is happening in donbas, where it is the most hot, well, the situation does not change, that is, not without a hot spot, it is definitely the severodonetsk-lysichansk region, e.e. there all the time they were here, that is, in principle, all the time if the second one is that the russians are trying to turn their attack on the slavic area, that is, so far, there is no more detailed information on the donetsk direction on the slavic direction, but if we are talking about severodonetsk, then at this moment, in fact, half of them are in residential houses destroyed,

85-90% of houses in this city are damaged in one way or another, that is, in essence, in essence, this is a continuation of the destruction of the city as such, this is what we saw before in kharkiv, before in okhtsi, before in other cities of ukraine, so far we are holding on, that is, we are in control track eh despite the fact that it is getting stronger track eh lysichansk-bakhmut eh that's why we can't do an operational encirclement of russia mr. volodymyr i wanted to talk to you about the topic of weapons because yesterday it seems to have appeared in the action of the survey yes from the minister of internal affairs eh to the ukrainians to express their opinion eh well, in what way exactly should we allow the ukrainians to have weapons ? question to raise for example, a month before the full-scale invasion

, which expert arestovych says, they knew about, for example , in sumy or in the same okhtyrka that you are talking about, or in trostyanka, which was occupied and people would have already been armed, instead of gathering fans there in the woods. why only now the question appeared in the action. why earlier and a year ago, for example, when western intelligence told us about the invasion of russia, we did not raise this issue neither in the ministries nor in the verkhovna rada, well, first of all, i would like to say that this issue was discussed in one way or another in in various television studios in various formats. wait, i'll answer your question. and i wanted to say that until february 24, the number of people who advocated the legalization of weapons never exceeded approximately 25%. that's why this issue was extremely unpopular with society and society said that we don't want any sale of weapons . now the situation has really changed dramatically

. during these three months, its candidates have changed and now we see that there are almost 70%. 607%, e is in favor of analyzing weapons because of the situation the real thing has changed, people have overestimated many things , uh, people have understood a lot of things, so in this case, i think that yes, it is obvious, after all, after the war, uh, or even during the war, we had to implement weapons, but we will have to approach this very discreetly, very carefully because the implementation of weapons has both positives and definitely yes, we all understand certain negatives , so here we need to approach this very well-considered corpus. it is very high-quality to write down the law in the first teacher, it has been adopted now. it is necessary to prepare it is normal for the second reading and to prepare the relevant by-laws so that uh, there is the simplest story, because everyone is foreign about the fact that when receiving a weapon, you need to get a case

from uh, a psychiatrist and who he is, well, it is clear that before the war, this certificate can be it was possible to buy conditional there for 100-200 uah and a lot of people bought like that when eh or something surprised at the proceedings, they received hunting weapons, that is, starting from such simple things and ending with more complex ones, because there are examples, this is the experience of many countries of the world, such as correctly understand the development of pva weapons here, clarifying about weapons i understand correctly that we are talking now about the paralysis of the market and in general the granting of the right to carry and own short-barreled weapons because well, i personally have a hunting rifle , please, you could also buy it separately, it was not a problem, it is official legally, now we are talking about a block, a short-barreled rifled weapon , you understand correctly, in general, there is a discussion going on right now , that is, it works, that is, uh, but they will start with them because the law should be adopted only in the first reading and now there is quite a lot of legal and

not only legal materials around this, that is, so that the audience understands that we are talking about a gun, that is, not everyone will walk around with rush. conditional kalashnikovs, but one for single shots, it was allowed and before this was not a problem, hunting weapons were mostly only so completely myslivska, well, there is a ksu carbine, one, one, a charger, there is a saiga, yes, she is myslivska but but well, we understand this d- a subpoena for ukrainians who, if i want to have a weapon for self-defense, then i will go to the appropriate specialists , a psychiatrist and a narcologist. approach very responsibly, there are many cases when these weapons are used by people not for their intended purpose, that is, they are offered either for special needs for personal protection, or in general, i am not against pva.

how do you see this format of a weapon permit for ukraine well, that is precisely for our society, considering the level of the criminogenic situation and the rest of the mentality. i think that, in principle, now it was necessary to organize weapons, this is a huge plus, because now the society has matured for this. and i think that with the appropriate rules and according to the norms, i think that it will be perceived normally by society, it will be normal , therefore, in this case, it is very good that there is a discussion, including through kyiv, and it is very good that several hundreds of thousands of people have already joined there voted in action. that is, it really caused a big enough resonance, and therefore, after this discussion, there will be a discussion of the owner or the main norms of the law before the second reading, and then it will be possible to talk directly about

legalization, therefore, in this case, there is no need to rush, but from my point of view in my view, this law will be adopted and i think that the weapon will be implemented vadim, well, i also wanted to ask you a question, as well as the angle to the former people's deputy and to the political scientist and to the present official who, among other things, is responsible there questions of safety and security, information coming to us from the front. please comment on this conflict in absentia. will not do anything about butusov, who constantly, without orders, publishes a ton of information about our military positions, the operational situation, will guide the way forward, will heat up russia, i will think that there is no gradual reform anymore it only makes sense to restart the rotten structure of the sbu , it means a complete restart from a part of unconscious patriotic specialists who suffer in the system ivan bakanov - this is a shame

bezugla wrote well, yuriy butusov himself said that this is maryana bezugla's answer to his criticism of her bill regarding the possibility of execution those servicemen in wartime conditions who do not obey the commander's order and who do you think is right here? of course, i have the right to criticize a people's deputy , but, uh, i can say that it is true. to the meeting hall, this is the first moment, the second moment in this particular case, i can say that i, as a person, as a citizen, i stand on the side of yury butusov, whom i have known for many years, i respect vadim very much, not to criticize the people's

it is possible to tell the deputy that the force is not very uh-uh there experienced doz, do something sbu, do something with butusov, what does something mean, a people's deputy says something well, it's not there, the offender is in criminal proceedings, don't check him, but do something. what is it necessary? to a people's deputy within the limits of the current legislation, how do they like to write this phrase in the name of the head of the sbu that a people's deputy has the right to make any statements, there are simply too many problems of attention to this statement, which is actually the same as the previous one bill i hope i have no chance for the future now. in general, we have not yet adopted a law on the reform of the security service of ukraine and it is in an advanced state. er, he is as much as possible

there more than a year old, and to be honest, at the moment we do not understand er, what is written there for the second reading, what will actually be proposed to the committee of the second reading, but er, for sure, after all, this war included large paintings in the way what should the special service look like, what should be in this special service, i think that appropriate decisions will be made later, gentlemen, yes, thank you. i am the only one, but i heard that the chair under ivan bakanov has been shaking in recent days, at least in certain political circles . this is commenting thank you vadym denysenko adviser to the minister of internal affairs of ukraine was our guest and we are moving on ivan varchenko expert on the security of the soldiers of the armed forces of ukraine good health to you

to talk about the kharkiv direction, the direction of the raisin , what is happening there now, the day before, the occupiers shelled kharkiv again, the head of the military administration reported what the positions are now, the nature of the confrontations, well, at the moment, there are positional positional confrontations, in principle, and the ukrainian armed forces continue to continue the offensive that began a week ago in defensive positions are in the hands of enemy forces, russian units to date and uh, the front line has more or less established itself now, of course, the enemy is trying to find weak spots in the ukrainian positions well, just as the ukrainians are destroying the enemy, they are already defending their land and trying to