therefore, this day i will write that the kremlin, against the background of minor successes in the donbass, once again talked about the possibility of an offensive on kyiv in order to implement the maximum plan, and allegedly that they may use conscripts for this new offensive. what is your e-e your by the way these things are generally plans. is this just propaganda to force ukrainians into some kind of negotiations or to scare the west? all of them were sincere , except for the jellyfish of social protection for children. let's see. here, so to speak. how from the point of view of a sane fool, which is generally quite tangential to this situation, so to speak, they should have usually gone to kyiv. because uh, by itself, donbass and crimea without uh, kyiv, that is, without the dnipro. this is

for they are a burden that will never be economically independent, these territories are thus logically their return to the idea of ​​capturing kyiv, coming closer to wanting to restore the soviet union there. of course, this goal is somewhere in his head. well, there is a lot more sits on that head and uh well, at this moment, most likely, they will uh, do certain military actions in order to pull our military forces away from the attack in the east and half uh, but the goal of seizing kyiv also remains, so to speak maybe i can't discuss this with you right now, for example, because we don't know how many troops they have accumulated, for example, in the bryansk region and in the north, we don't know this, but what about you? if a large army appears there

the number of equipment and personnel of the russians we can expect that they will break through again . but in this case, it will again be preceded by a serious missile attack or three tracks along which they will go, that is, they will try to clean up and go to kyiv again, but when it is mykhailo prytula, a reserve colonel of the sbu, an expert in military counterintelligence and the most positive news of these hours is actually the offensive of the ukrainian armed forces in the south, we have the next guest of our broadcast valery chaly diplomat, former ambassador of ukraine to the united states of america 2016-2019 the chairman of the board of the ukrainian crisis media center is in touch with us, congratulations, mr.

valery , i congratulate you. there was no such format. and yesterday there were talks with the federal treasurer of austria karl niehammer. by the way, i already noticed that the federal offices always talk before they appear the leaders of france, germany. it seems that they are just this kind of chess game . different things in the last two weeks, we have seen uh, the main motive, uh, we are tired of the russian-ukrainian war, maybe somewhere there, ukraine can uh-uh give up something, and why , just give up a part of the territory. well, talk we can talk in different countries. now,

after analyzing the situation, we have a monitoring group in our center, i can tell you with a very high probability that this was a special information operation of russia, i.e. and why do even the leaders of various ecological states come across it? well, we're not talking about macron, oleksandr. and about the former ones, well, plus, kyiv has already been mentioned there, since ancient times, they pulled out a person, that is, in principle, it was an express operation, it, uh, i can say it failed and now the old old story has already gone again, you remember, you say it correctly, vitaliy, maybe they saw it, this is the sequence of the negotiators. by the way, they decided, i can say it . and here we have to be careful because in this situation it is impossible

to ignore that if someone solves his questions regarding these negotiations well, i saw him crying after the conversation and french german he looks tougher than the previous one how is it there it is done if it corresponds to your conversation, which was completely. in principle, it is more offensive, and i really hope that the conversation was about the exchange of prisoners, because the only issue that can be discussed at what level today is only about the exchange of poleon and grain. well, of course, they even said about it publicly, that is, officially, and there were some ideas like that again, well, you know, on the one hand, there are some proposals that do not fit on your head. well, as always, they are russian, but on the other hand, it is clear that, in principle, the question is a problem

it has really touched serious circles. i would say not only the countries of the world, but also business world, and this is a serious business and agrarian lobby that exists in the world, that is, it is not only a matter of putting this grain now, because really according to un estimates, there is food left there for two months, or how to lay down a new one is impressive, that is, to ensure that for the next period , it is important to replace ukraine here quickly , that is, therefore, in principle, the solution, of course, which is requested is the strengthening of ukraine as soon as possible so that it deo buys its territory and or how the intermediate stage is the unblocking of the ports and, uh, just so that these deliveries take place and not the thefts of russia, the unblocking of the ports are your

options, that is, during such a situation, when the black sea is blocked, the convoys must ensure this. it is obvious, but i am worried, so i am trying to find some solution the paradox of negotiations is that we are at war, when everyone's interests coincide, then decisions can be made, but these decisions are situational , and i will tell you what we will see next. the question of entering the bosphorus, and russian ships there will also want to return or enter the black sea there. that is, this is a very difficult question, so in principle, i do not really believe in all these negotiations, because everything is decided by success on the front and in exchange for gum corridors for ukrainian grain and fertilizers we

remember that vladimir putin stated that russia sets such and such a condition and is ready to make a significant contribution to overcoming the food crisis on the condition that western sanctions imposed in response to large-scale aggression are lifted. well, that's not all what they cleared up, they are still such manipulators and price- tags, you can't get used to it in any way, but obviously this kind of informational thing is somewhere in france, in germany, and in others in italy, in some other european countries, it somehow reaches some part of the people in our country in principle, the skin is like that, so we understand that russia does this only if it overcooks them, which means a lot about sanctions, i will tell you one thing, maybe they did not follow all the sanctions from the united states and partners regarding the agricultural sector of the grain supply of others

important supplies that are needed to prevent famine, they were not applied from the very beginning. that is, it was all foreseen and there is nothing in principle to remove such sanctions. and what they wanted, who want to remove the sanctions that were applied even earlier the first period of occupation and the occupation of parts of the ukrainian territory. and now and during the war. well, then it will break the entire position and divide the countries of western europe, they will not go for it. you feel that you already see what is there there are several groups, the first group is the united states of great britain, ukraine has a tough position, everyone should liberate their territories, the second group, relatively speaking, france, germany, italy, so we must help putin, there is no victory, but we must look for opportunities for negotiations, and the third group, relatively speaking, which is ready to act with independent interests in

such a simple a difficult moment for turkey and hungary, conditionally speaking, and this is no longer such a single event that seemed to us to be a single event february 24, 2022 well, those countries that you called it in principle and not there was only one event in such a list, so nothing new in principle during the war, all these nuances are simply exacerbated, i already said that some people want to jump out here with profits and if they help her and look for some intermediary functions there, well, all the countries that you named which belong to nato, the european union, germany. i believe that the russian actions of putin and the war against ukraine have brought them very close together, but they have not worked so closely in recent decades, that is, if compared with previous periods, it is very similar well, a consolidated position. we especially see it

. rammstein's first meeting was in germany, then rammstein, which took place a month later, and there were 40 plus 48 countries there, and the number of these countries is increasing due to the supply of weapons to ukraine. that is, there is consolidation, but these are the differences that were there before. they are now if we talk about the players more distant from the direct combat zone there in china or brazil, that is, they have their own position, so our task is to still unite them around one with a clear goal, the de-occupation of the territory of ukraine should be as fast as possible, and then all these questions that they fear will be removed. why did this all arise now? i will tell you from my own experience of the 14th year of working in the same positions that are now

in the power structures during the war in the fourth month of 3-4 months, some such period is coming, i felt it then with partners and even physically, a person who gets tired psychologically gets tired, uh, it ’s about the fact that there is such a thing that arose, it’s not a pause, on the contrary , military actions are maximal, now maximally intensity but among those who do not directly participate, a pause of some kind arises and the thought arises that maybe it can be somehow settled now no, it will not work and that is why we must insist with all allies that as soon as possible means faster weapons, heavy weapons , faster than a slap, this sanction is tougher and those elements that arise in particular in relation to food security. well, how do you say? from

the point of view of a ukrainian, you know, against the background of our threats and victims, all this looks, well, absolutely not the same as it looks for the african countries that are expecting of this food, so the situation is difficult here, but the country that supplied supplies and is ready to provide the world with grain in the future, and now we just need to do the simple thing of unblocking the black sea and taking ukrainian ships through the bosphorus . more questions, yes. that is, we know that ukraine receives land -based launchers anti-ship missiles, harpoons for defense against an aggressor in the black sea, the ministry of defense of ukraine informed about this, and the weapons are provided by great britain and the netherlands, but about weapons, i would like more details p valery, for literally three minutes we have an important topic, the administration, fuck us, praised the sending to

ukraine of long- range salvo rocket systems, gmlrs and himars, the new york times wrote about this with reference to american officials . to explain, they can be used in three if with three types of ammunition, the first is a 32 km range m-26 missile, the second option is a g mlrs guided missile with a range of up to 70 km this actually, ukraine will receive these missiles now, and the third type is tactically an e-e ata cms missile and the range is 300 km, and actually military experts from defense express explain why these 300 km missiles are important for us, because in this way we will be able to destroy the main enemy targets of the enemy at a much greater depth, that is, it is not a question of yes, the

attack on the kremlin is a question of purely practical things, enemy airfields, the ways of advancing the enemy’s logistical columns, the bases of equipment before entering the attack line, standard military practice, and reuters wrote the day before that the usa hesitates to provide ukraine with such long-range long- range weapons, because it could irritate putin , and they are trying to somehow achieve some kind of common understanding of the danger of escalation , reuters writes. actually, these behind-the-scenes discussions are very delicate, but at the moment we can see that ukraine will not receive these missiles with a range of 300 km yet, it is said that this could be the next step of the allies, what are your comments here, why are they actually hesitating, the united states is afraid to provoke russia and when we expect that this can

change, look, i am not an expert in the military sphere, you have commented on everything very well, i will only say that when you read the newspapers, when you see the leaks of information and they are, of course, done on purpose, but this is not the whole picture, so if you ask me why the united states does not they want to send, but who told you that you don't want to? well , right away, i'll tell you in a different way, but now we paid attention to the official statement, so the minister of defense said what types of weapons are already on our territory, and the transport department has been opened - it's a transport department the us command, well, for some reason, i don’t know why they opened all these exact volumes, but they gave the exact volumes of anti-tank anti-aircraft weapons and the supply of e-bonyshins, that is, shells, that is, they all already give everything, all this can be seen, eh, we are actually moving to

interoperability with nato countries by the number of weapons is now already 155 150 mm e projectiles, there are already more weapons than the soviet ones, therefore, in principle, it is a huge soup because of what is happening in the region in our situation, you see what types of weapons different people are dealing with the ukrainian army, the armed forces of ukraine, so this is all for the future, and for the future, i would propose such a thing, you know, there is now about planes, and they have not decided with planes, but the americans have them. angels, they are flying like f-18 and fm-18. i'm sorry . why don't we, our pilots, train with them now, just for the demonstration of the beautiful flights of the usa, i would think about the future, well, what about the war and the stoppage of russia. we

let's win as allies, let's continue to be together and strengthen our security so that russia will no longer advance towards us, that's why we need to think prospectively, and what is coming, you will see the result already from the relevant e-e information of the general staff of the ministry of defense, as it is now more coming in. i think it is right we still need to talk about this more to people so that our confidence in the victory will be strengthened thank you thank you panel chaly and diplomat express of ukraine in the usa for 16-19 years, the chairman of the board of the ukrainian crisis media center was with us at connection and right now we are including the next expert in our conversation, yuriy felshtynskyi, russian-american historian and doctor

of historical sciences, congratulations, mr. yuriy, good afternoon. there are some signs of recovery while you have the elite, or vice versa, there are signs of a further transformation of this situation into such a fantasy that vladimir putin wants to ask himself everything kormyt says is happening now amazingly perfect things when even the deputies of the state duma are swearing among themselves and there it is necessary to go to the donbass, he does not go there. do you know whether volodin is against the third party, tritsyak against volodya, the turkchak, turchak is against volodin, and they are there discussing where the seat of the state duma deputy is now in the donbass or in moscow, and all this looks like a country, to put it mildly, from the point of view of the overall feeling and reality and adequacy, i don’t think that there will be any variables, uh, i don’t think first of all, there is an elite in russia, there is a leadership of a wide circle in the russian circle, which consists, first of all, and most of the

senior kgb officers, and they accordingly rule the country. and i do not think that any excuses can happen there yuri, i would like to talk to you a little bit about nuclear blackmail of russia, we see that a new assessment by the united nations has appeared these days, which claims that russia itself can use nuclear weapons. and this report management of the coordination of humanitarian issues of the un warns about this, the prospect of a nuclear conflict, which was once unthinkable, is now again within the limits of the possible, in your opinion, to what extent putin and his entourage, against the background of strategic losses in ukraine, the lack of achievements that could be presented to the population, are close to a nuclear

tactical or strategic strike and i think that this is the most dangerous thing that is already a fact of the war in ukraine. considers this conflict or this war as a war between russia and the united states, and patrushev also designated two threats or two types, i don’t know the weapons that russia intends to use, and the first is an artificial device in the organization of an artificial city ah and ah, as a result of this mass emigration of the african population to europe, it will destroy europe, yes, and well, besides

, it is really many times, it is different from the top, released from below by the propagandists, it was told that it would nuclear weapons are used, and in principle, as long as there are no ordinary armies, as we see it, yes, to capture all the territories that he designated for us, and he designated ukraine and moldova, and all three former soviet baltic republics , and in fact, all the zone of the former warsaw pact countries lost as a result of the collapse of the soviet union and, as it were, the collapse of the warsaw pact, that is, the plan of putin's very ambitious and ordinary weapons for this, as we see it, no, we see it on the example of how the war in ukraine is being waged of course, it is absolutely destructive for ukraine and

leads to insane victims in ukraine. well, about children, and it is not easy for the russian army to be in the russian country, so it is clear that putin, as it were, does not carry enough revelations, the destruction of ukraine, from his point of view, will make his way to transnistria and organize such a женский well, against moldova, and he will present a nuclear ultimatum , this is what has already been indicated . direct confrontation between the sitting states and russia. i think that the threats that should be considered at this stage and they are real are the transfer of nuclear tactical weapons to the donbass, which is recognized as ukrainian

territory, and the delivery of nuclear strikes by these tactical weapons from the donbass to ukraine, that is, from one part how about ukraine? yes, in the second, and transfer, or how lukashenko said returning nuclear weapons to belarus, because belarus has already been withdrawn from nuclear status. i hope that it can't be done. give me an inconspicuous look. if suddenly on some day and at some time we begin to understand that putin is transferring nuclear weapons either to the donbass or to belarus, then this is the moment that for us should mean a significant nuclear strike. if we talk about what

you are saying, putin planned it for himself and it will be done in the context of breaking through to transnistria well, it will be done if the armed forces of ukraine allow, we will make a remark because so far our armed forces have gone to the south in a counteroffensive and this is very important and we see that we currently have such a situation that the head of the russian foreign ministry , sergey lavrov, said that the supply of weapons by western countries to ukraine that can strike the territory of the russian federation will be a step towards an unacceptable escalation, today it became known that the usa will provide ukraine with the dreamed-of electronic now with missiles with a range of 70 km, the next step will be up to 300 km, that is, which can attack targets in the russian

federation . the west, which can be a symmetrical step to provide ukraine with chimars, because i don't know how to speak ukrainian. i don't know how to answer putin. i know for sure that this is the language of an excellent working class, but i hope that i'm asking the question correctly. first of all, whether or not russian troops will break through to transnistria depends primarily on the level of resistance of the ukrainian army . the problem is that putin does not have one very serious advantage over which there is no other country, let it be absolutely equal to how many a russian soldier will die in this war, and moreover, i believe that the more russian soldiers die, the more russian soldiers will die . in a sense, it is easier for putin

to explain to his stupid russian population that this is a serious war and somehow you have to lose people yes and because in the end the theme of the greatness of the victory of the soviet union in the second world war equipped is based on the fact that the soviet tv series is bigger than all the others yes so that putin is not afraid of standing soldiers he absolutely doesn't care how many of them will die there, and with such logic, of course. sooner or later, he can make his way to transnistria. at the same time, he will also put down a large number of his soldiers, and unfortunately, ukrainian ones. sooner or

later, and it would be better if it happened, the sooner he will come to the conclusion that this war must be entered into openly and without regard to the possible, but i don't know about increasing the level. yes, as lavrov said. we went over and look now at what if we will do it россии можете дней это, ah, it shouldn't be, because everything that putin can do, he will do anyway , he will do everything he set out to do, and he will do it anyway , and not uh, no, that's not the question, and it's not even ukraine. it depends on how putin will introduce himself. well, accordingly, the corrective path is the people who are together with him. because i don’t think that if putin is removed tomorrow, you will be removed

if he dies or if there is more. and the police of the russian state will change. yes, that is, it is unlikely that we should say what russia will say with the death of putin that she repents, she will move to the border of the seventh year, yes, even before they entered the country and began to pay reparations for those inflicted in ukraine and georgia, i do not think that this will happen, and therefore they are counting on it, it is probably not worth counting on it it is extremely important, and i think that the most important factor, the most important fact is the risk of a thermonuclear war, and putin will certainly go to a thermonuclear war the moment he seizes all the territories that he has designated as subject to seizure in the event of a nuclear war. ukraine and moldova will actually proceed

to reorganize the new part of their program and new phases of the war and return to the zone of the russian empire and all the countries of eastern europe. thank you. - i foresee and see the dangers that no one else sees, i think that these dangers are the most important for nato andrei brokotrisoedinennyh statov and i think that people who believe that this conflict can be frozen within the borders of ukraine he is such a calm afghan version when the whole world of russia will fight in ukraine and they will be the anthem of ukrainians america