the decision of our agricultural structure is a reality, so turkey is a member of the candidate scientist of the european union for 34 years, the night is very long and has not become a member of the eu, we have a very long gap between three or four years of turkey and the 80s 8 dash 10 years that passed there such countries as joined the european union and denmark poland waited 15 years for its place, which means in principle with a positive result if we talk about the fact that after the war ukraine will be significantly deindustrialized and will lose a huge part of its economy, all this will have to be restored, we can talk about the years 2035-37, which will end with the accession of ukraine to the european union, but i will tell you simply that if we do not meet democratic standards, this term will simply increase and

it can easily increase to 34 years for turkey when turkey became a candidate for the european union and the leaders were sure that they could now do anything in terms of the democratic infrastructure of preserving rights people freedom of the press and so on and they will still be taken to the european union because they are an economically seriously developed country that closes one economic package for others they are really in turkey, serbia is even a candidate for negotiations, or the european union has already been given more than 15 years, that is, we can wait as long as we want if we want not to wait, but to hurry to really become a member there in 2035-37-2035-2040 this has not happened to the european union before, however, you should not think that we should not behave like a

european state now, so why do you think so huge independent media is what needs to be done today in order to get candidate status or at least hope in june? yes, but status is nothing will decide our future correctly , and economists are talking about it, they are talking about the fact that it will stimulate the inclusion of ukrainian enterprises in european chains. in addition, this is a powerful signal to putin himself that he actually lost in ukraine, and it will not be worth anything to putin to continue the war against countries on the territory of a country that is a candidate for european union scientists, no european investments will go to ukraine if we become or a candidate member of the european union and the war will continue, the threat will remain if we really want the ukrainian economy to develop, we must becoming a member of nato, all other memberships will not change anything in this situation. of the union and we will continue to live as we live and

wait for the next missile attack. i apologize, but montenegro, a candidate scientist of the european union, it did not save the country, neither did the attempts, nor the attempted coup, which was organized by pro-russian forces, they were almost already on target and almost killed the president montenegro miladjukanovic it is just a possibility that it was found this solution only because the british intelligence seems to report now montenegro with great difficulty removed from the authorities, a pro-russian political government that appeared there as a result of a serious special operation, people who were preparing the state castle of montenegro until recently were members of the ruling coalition just a month ago, if we become candidate members of the european union and not be members of nato, these are the challenges that await us well, here is the question we hear more and more now that ukraine can first become a member of nato and only then go through the necessary procedures for

its integration into the european union. what do you think about such a scenario, as far as we can actually do it? to end up in nato faster than the european union is absolutely simple, the victory of ukraine in the war will mean the restoration of ukraine's territorial integrity and cession to us, if one of these conditions is not fulfilled, all these candidates in the european union and all these unions that bory proposes to create are of no importance from johnson, all these other proposals because we can do all this, but in a year or two we will be in a new confrontation with russia in new missile strikes in new territorial seizures imagine that you are a western businessman here i apologize, buy apartments for the factory, if you know for sure that you are investing money in ukraine, which is currently at war, and tomorrow it may become the arena of new missile attacks in russia, your factory may simply be destroyed, what will you lose money, it is better to get rid of it workers from this country and somewhere in

poland you will open a factory for yourself. this is much only after the victory, after all, nato is the solution to this problem - this is nato nato - this is a signal that other nato member countries are ready to protect you from war and you are therefore in them principles you her investors you already in you they can say, listen, russia can attack nato member countries, but then you ca n't invest money in portugal, in france, in italy, in spain, in the netherlands, in poland, in belgium. ukraine finds itself in the same situation as everyone else, only with a cheaper workforce then we have an advantage then it makes sense to invest money here because it is clear that if russia will fight with the alliance then it will fight with all lances and wherever you have property you are in danger tactical integration should not be euro-realistic. and the only possible scenario is that ukraine can afford not to be a member of

the european union, nothing will happen to it, it will be a poor country, but at least it will exist, but if it is not a member of nato, ukraine in principle can ask yourself whether it will exist in five 10 years, but here, too, not everything is left of us, of course, so we have to convince in this event, this should be the main task of our diplomacy, we have to say everything that should happen after the victory when we say there that we have to negotiate with russia about neutral status, it means that we have to negotiate with russia about our suicide. and this would have been the question at the first series of talks between ukraine and russia. we proposed that we would be a neutral state, it didn't end with anything and that we would be given some guarantees, so i'm telling you, they wouldn't give us any guarantees that would allow us to protect ourselves from russian aggression in the event that putin after this war, we still need this war ended, i am speaking with a christian, without a nuclear strike, without the destruction of a large number of the ukrainian population, a new strike will be struck at any moment, even if we liberate all our

territories, because russia will prepare not just for a war with ukraine, but for the liberation of the russian territories occupied by the nazis, crimea, donbass they will definitely annex these transitions as soon as they can, and in this situation, of course, only membership in nato can become a problem - if, god forbid, we will not liberate donbas and crimea, we have to give nato written guarantees that we will not liberate this territory by military means ourselves, so as not to involve nato countries in a military conflict with russia. but the territory that will be controlled by us must become a country participating in the north atlantic season . putin's regime or until the destruction of the ukrainian state and everyone who lives on this earth must understand that this is only the beginning of these trials that will continue throughout the reign of volodymyr putin, he will try to seize the ukrainian territory up to the border with poland. well, what is not

understood here, and all this will end. one fine day, when the majority of the ukrainian flag is flying in the movlenka near the headquarters of nato's apartment. by the entire state and all leaders who can join this process and have leverage over individual leaders who are making individual decisions, some will participate in this process, of course, and demonstrate national capacity because lack of national unity is the way to the fact that we will have to forget about the euro-atlantic integration of ukraine, and to forget about euro-atlantic integration is to forget about normal peaceful life in the ukrainian state, at least for the next 20-25 years. why do i think that i am exaggerating? israel appeared on the political map of the world on may 14, 1948, and until the mid-70s of the xx century, it fought in neighboring countries that were successful, it was less successful when the enemies already

were located somewhere at a distance of several kilometers from tel aviv. in principle, it was now a war when the enemies were on the outskirts of kyiv, where will we forget about it, they were already on the outskirts of kyiv and they want to return there, and i absolutely do not want that. i recently spoke with an israeli a colleague said why is she an amorphous union? i beg him to say on the territory of this amorous union nothing is happening, but the territories of israel are behind these with all the strength of his and the capabilities of a strong army for 50 years in a row something is happening if he had not threatened ramzan kadyrov of poland, that's what i said that i want ukraine to be divided into the fates of belgium and the fate of israel, with all my love for israel, my simple ones, i said patriotic, jewish pride, tasks , israel is so protected from dangers, i want ukrainians to live like in belgium, it's bad, but not like in israel well, what's the matter here, vitaliy, let's talk a little about the church, it's really important

, because on friday, may 27, the patriarchate of the panteleimon monastery of the theophany in kyiv considered the issue of church life that arose as a result of russia's military aggression in ukraine and made a decision on complete independence and independence from the russian orthodox church. well, let's recall that during the war, the uoc mp was repeatedly accused of its collaborationism, the council even registered a bill on the prohibition of this organization, which, according to the patriotic environment, is a branch of the fsb in ukraine, let's figure out what it means to make a decision from a purely technical point of view and if this church is now independent from moscow, then to whom is it subject to and this decision, in principle , does not mean anything today from a technical point of view, because the church is generally a non-metallurgical plant, the church does not exist from the technical point of view, and the church does not exist from the point of view of the

statutes in which something is written that was there it is written, i don't know what they changed in this statute, but the church exists from the point of view of canonicity, there is a simple thing, there is the concept of a canonical territory if ukraine is a canonical territory of the ecumenical patriarchate, as announced by the ecumenical patriarch the patriarch giving thomas the ukrainian orthodox - these are the orthodox churches of ukraine in 2018, this was it seems so in 2008, but in fact it was announced by the ecumenical patriarch in 1994 when the tomos was given to the orthodox church of poland, it was already stated that the issue was handed over to the metropolitanate of kyiv and metropolies related to it the russian orthodox church about and took place contrary to canon law, so that the ecumenical

patriarchate stated that in 1924, i am not kidding , you can look at this document, it is precisely on the basis this document was given autocephaly to the orthodox church of poland and now the same thesis is repeated in the tomos received by the orthodox church of ukraine if we consider this a violation of the ecumenical patriarchate in 2018 and received on january 6, 2019 in istanbul, it means that there is already the local church of ukraine, the representative patriarch issued the tomos to the orthodox community of ukraine as such, not to the kyiv patriarchate, not to the ukrainian autocephalous orthodox church, but to all orthodox communities of ukraine, including the ukrainian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate, all it has to do to be independent is to unite and join. i'm sorry for the orthodox church of ukraine, this is a canonical decision . one is another canonical decision. if the ukrainian orthodox church considers itself, it considers

moscow to be the canonical territory of ukraine, and the russian orthodox church. believes that constantinople is wrong and that the canonical territory is in moscow behind moscow and she wants independence. yes , she has according to all canons, she likes it, she does not like it, to turn to patriarch kirill of i am not talking about the result of this, i am saying what she should do, and if patriarch kirill issues that tomos on autocephaly, you know what she should do next, ask for confirmation of this tomos to the ecumenical patriarch bartholomew, who will not confirm it because he considers ukraine his own economic territory , i believe that the patriarch of moscow cannot solve this. a simple illustration of the last weeks so that we understand. the ecumenical patriarch recognized the canon of the orthodox church in macedonia, but told them i issued thomas the serbian orthodox church to the entire territory and i consider you macedonians of the canonical

territory of the serbian orthodox church, therefore, and with your status, deal with them, the serbian patriarch brought to the heap a tomos about the autocephaly of the macedonian orthodox church, he said yes, we believe that you can be an autocephalous church , it is clear that the brothers give you the independence of metropolitan oh rare, the head of the orthodox church of macedonia is given on the fourth or june 6, he goes to the ecumenical patriarch according to the confirmation of this tomos as do you think that if metropolitan onufriy, the head of the independent orthodox church of ukraine, will go to patriarch bartholomew in the morning, what will he hear there? there is nothing good . this ukrainian orthodox church of ukraine is now the russian orthodox church of shirotinger, because it is not clear if all of them are in one

or the ukrainian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate stops publishing itself for what it is not and simply unites with the ptu through the mediation of the ecumenical patriarch of moscow there is no place here at all and after that they are this church is recognized by all local churches because there is no longer any split in ukrainian orthodoxy and onufry becomes the patriarch of kyiv of all ukraine i am seriously saying that this is an absolutely real way out of the situation or simply more and more faithful of the uoc of the moscow patriarchate will transfer to the orthodox church of ukraine and in the end all these metropolitan bishops who make some kind of decision at the council, i will remain the naked kings of apostasy, but if they like it. if you do not want to bring yourself to such a situation, amen. i do not sympathize with any of them at all, but i simply believe that metropolitan onufriy as a person, well, i hope by faith that there are not many

believers in this patients, but he is definitely a believing person. well, he should think about his responsibility to those who go to the temples of the ukrainian orthodox church, because they go and hear how they lavry today, today they commemorate kirill, the patriarch of the bandit war, of course a corrupt person as his great master, well, i apologize, well, a woman has a child at the front, a husband died, a russian soldier raped her daughter , she comes to god and hears that metropolitan onufriy or some other metropolitan of the uoc mp commemorates a bandit who did not even condemn it, this is right, the patriarch of phraseology says that they expected that they wanted to condemn yours well, they didn't, but only until the negotiations continue what stop the bloodshed and i'm talking about this cathedral they didn't condemn the war either and they continue

to commemorate cyril, despite the fact that they condemned, they say that cyril is our great master, well, how many of them are there, will the mental strength be enough to come to them? well, in the end, this situation will end as long as this situation does not continue. the ukrainian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate in our country is doomed to disappear, and i think that the majority people who still go to the churches of the uoc mp go there out of inertia or because there are no other orthodox churches somewhere where they are located . i think it is irresponsible what is happening with the priests of the bcm fedorovych many of they are helped by the front, which really sees all these horrors in this way, because it is also its own congregation, and at the same time, they continue to dogmatically adhere to the idea of ​​the need for a connection with moscow orthodoxy in the territory, which, i emphasize, is not canonical for the church . the lavra suffered the most since the

first days of the war from russian shelling. we remember how russian bombs flew into the church and into the vaults where the parishioners of the svyatogorsk lavra were hiding. why does putin not spare the believers from churches, e.e. kirill and why do we feel sorry for them, why why, people, i assure you that in the city of mariupol, which was destroyed by vladimir putin, the number of believers was greater than that of the ukrainian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate, i assure you that in the city of kharkiv, for which the majority were believers were ukrainian of the moscow orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate, all of them were parishioners of the uoc mp, and they say once again that in principle, putin does not need the population, but the territory, the territory. it is necessary to answer to ukraine so that we understand with you what is the meaning of all this. while you

open it, i will say that i am personally extremely inspired by the decision of the synod of the orthodox church of ukraine on the establishment of the men's monastery of the holy dormition kiev-pechersk lavra, and accordingly, the synod instructed the metropolitan to turn to epiphany government with a request to hand over one of the temples to the upper lavra and some of its premises for the use of the orthodox church of ukraine, we hope for the wisdom of the cabinet of ministers of ukraine that such a decision will be made as soon as possible adopted so, the commissars advise their soldiers how to talk to the bastards they occupied in the occupied territories, it sounds like they were shot, liquefied, killed, it is necessary, the problem was solved in relation to domestic dogs, marauders , the representative of the theater defense, don't say that they , you killed them, the problem was solved, it sounds like death by dill, russia is already here forget about ukraine, it is necessary for the people to decide how to live on their own in terms of what will happen, who will lead ukraine or russia. well, i don’t know what kind of

idiots they are looking for. ukrainians came from by the humanitarian mission, how did your government abandon you unnecessarily to explain that there are people under fire in the donbass, and we came to solve this problem. or russians, we are ukrainians, and russians are the main thing that we are orthodox , we have nothing to share when entering into disputes, it leads to the prime minister of the gay parade, to the schism of orthodoxy, we are russians, inappropriately speaking 9 years of propaganda they presented the image of the russian to the image of the invader , the image of the orthodox is pure, we say that we orthodox do not blame the khokhlov for everything, ukraine is blamed for the puppets of poroshenko, zelensky and the doll of the year from the usa until the formation of the state apparatus and the law, this is the basis, we will be forced to live with our own understanding ukraine - ukrainians will be removed before the formation of

the state apparatus that is, until we tell them that they should not attack us, and then, in principle, that's all we came, now there will be order , we tell them, we will temporarily help the population find among your people those who want to help their union, but you understand. that's all for you, that is, they, that's what we're saying. they don't really understand what they're doing. this is what they do. they understand everything. they want to eliminate ukraine and in the east, too, and they just say that to people. so that there is no obvious resistance and that a person who wants to somehow survive can see that we show on the screen these wonderful texts. so this is just a very important thing. well, there will only be resistance, and it is actually what with what putin miscalculated from the very beginning his invasion of ukraine and this is what is actually harmful for his military campaign, that is why he

is losing and losing in ukraine well, in the meantime, i wanted us to discuss the topic of the naval blockade by vitaly, the vice-prime minister of the so-called government of the occupied crimea, george muradov said that after the capture of mariupol by the russian army, the sea of ​​azov became a sea for the common use of russia and the dpr group, the propaganda agency ria novosti e-e wrote about this on may 23. access of ukraine to the sea of ​​azov, receiving a land corridor with the occupied crimea since the end of march 2020, and that this criminal activity of russia is condemned by the whole world and it is condemned in the resolution of the parliamentary assembly of the council of europe and by all countries of the collective of the west, but at the same time let's try to figure out how to

interpret these statements, what is their purpose and what to expect regarding the sea blockade from the side of the russian federation, well, first of all, regarding the sea of ​​azov, he said that this sea will be internal by the sea of ​​russia if there will be no dpr before the dpr, when they occupy, if they occupy this territory of donetsk region, they will hold a fake referendum there, i have already talked about this before, and they will join the donetsk region of ukraine to the russian federation, that is, don’t even think that they will remain until dpr lpr they don't need this, they needed eight years. while they thought that with the help of these people's republics, they would be able to destabilize the situation in ukraine. that is, they didn't do it. they don't need the shopping center anymore. they will simply annex the territory, i.e. this story is over, and if the ukrainian armed forces cannot knock them out of the azov coast, of

course they can do it with their internal lake , it is not even necessary to even doubt their intentions, this is one point regarding the blockade. we also understand what they are doing they want to provoke a serious famine in the world by september with the following consequences: the first consequence is the destabilization of the situation in the countries of the third world, the revolution, the new arab spring, what will happen to the west the second thing is that there is a big migration crisis and that means that there are emigrants from ukraine and they are treated very warmly there, of course, it helps with this, but in any case it is necessary to understand that the entire social infrastructure, when millions of people arrive, it is already working on its last revolutions of its capabilities, and this is what has repeatedly helped russia carry out its criminal plans regarding these millions of migrants, millions more migrants from the third world are joining, and there will already be women with children there and there will already be

men, i.e. complete families, it is much more difficult and we know that in europe they are afraid of migrants from those regions that this gives the opportunity to strengthen xenophobic sentiments, the pope said that we did not understand him at the time of this very statement when he said that we must get rid of realism , he i didn't mean that it's bad that you accept migrations in ukraine like this, i meant that you should accept all migrants in an equally friendly way, this is not happening in reality either , and this means, firstly, that it will lead to destabilization in europe, and secondly, it will lead to the strengthening of those political forces that later invested money for ten years, we are not only talking about july, there is some alternative for germany, we have already almost forgotten about them and we will remember them, and this is exactly what putin is striving for. strives for a change of power in european countries and not only in european countries and in the united states of america,

something needs to be done better about the safety of our schools and to finance the defense of ukraine in the war with russia, there are no other budget items on which it would be possible to save money, where to finance schools. that is, it bothers him because it does not correspond to his views on the fact that it is necessary to agree with the announcer, you are an important point, yes, but there is still time before the presidential elections in the states, but european governments can fall faster and he really wants to provide with the help of hunger, this is another special operation. well, let's figure out what to do with the collective action in this situation. to be honest, the statements from the first one from the united nations, and then from european leaders. we hear that putin demands, accordingly, such proposals are being considered to lift or limit the sanctions pressure on

russia and belarus. we were the first to hear about belarus. now we hear about russia and it openly demands it. can give in to putin in this, because it meant connivance, people are wondering what to do, i think that it is right, this is a fight with the russian black sea fleet, so it is necessary to destroy them, like mine, there are more russian ships in the black sea, the convoy is two negotiations o.t. macaroni today they spoke something with putin about the grain crisis for this, er, the head of the italian government they have some kind of solution to find this solution that we all need because, first of all, in ukraine we need money for grain, the truth is that we just need money for the economy of secondly, people need something to eat. this is a serious problem. they will die of hunger . when everyone says that it will be necessary to

negotiate with russia in the fall on oil and gas, i think that this is an exaggeration because naftogaz can be replaced by the russian ones. oh, and oh, this situation is always established and allows the new ones to never sleep on it. i think that we will have time to finish our speech and well , that's what i stopped at, er, in the fall, they can resume at least such voices of negotiations with russia regarding oil and gas that i think it will be possible, er, how should i solve this issue, he knew about gas, but er with grain it will be much more difficult to solve the question of its need decide now, that is, you can live without russian energy carriers, because many different countries can supply oil and gas more expensively for european countries, but this does not mean that everyone will be in the cold, and in the cold, but in the famine, this stadium problem depends on the supply of grain from

ukraine and here we see that quick solutions are needed, because this grain is left with different evaluations for 10 weeks, and i am also worried about going to italy for a minute, it remains actually a question of the tribunal regarding the russian federation tribunal and e hmm not only for the war crimes of the russian army in ukraine but also for the challenge to global global stability for e provoking the most severe humanitarian crisis in europe since the second world war e is a decision resolution of the parliamentary assembly of the council of europe on the creation of such a tribunal is a decision and the european parliament supported such a resolution, the idea of ​​a tribunal is supported in the united states and great britain. so, will russia actually be held accountable, so far we are only collecting the facts of these crimes, including food crimes if putin's regime will collapse, the responsibility

has come if putin's regime will continue to exist. i think that people who are his representatives can feel completely safe. it must be clearly said that it is and it depends on all the efforts of ukraine and its on this wisdom of its authorities, particularly in e- er guarantee of freedom of speech and respect for the opposition and also from western countries from our allies who right now should more actively supply weapons to ukraine, we see what is happening there thank you dear er viewers and we will now pass on the words on the cover of iryna koval, who is already in the studio preparing for you and will inform you of the latest news