and in general, well, this last conversation is marked by a slob and putin, what did he say about the mistakes and financial economic measures that led to the politics of the russian federation and the sanctions imposed in connection with this on it, therefore, of course, the russian language, in your opinion, is such a hint and constantly at the level of a whisper, the british and the baltic countries are also saying that such a paramilitary operation to blockade ukrainian ports is serious talk, or are europeans seriously going to rescue africans with weapons in their hands on the shores of ukraine, let's say so and on the coastal territory, water territories, that is, because there are home-made africans there or asians who will starve, this is the same issue of security and

global. i mean, imagine if , for example, in the same er and the same egypt, somewhere 60% of the population receives subsidies for bread, what will happen if you say that the government will not be able to feed this not only such a favorable and nutritious atmosphere for various islamist movements, it is not only possible uprisings or the overthrow of the government there, but also the waves of emigrants that we saw in in 2015-16, from syria, when russia began to destroy syrian cities like mariupoli, that is why not only the lives of other citizens of some developing countries are at stake here, but also the safety of europeans themselves, but on the other hand, again, russia is a nuclear power with its own iskanders, who were supposed to be slackers, were not, and of course this is a deterrent and we can directly expect that the royal navy, uh, that means the british or

some other one, will come to clear all those russian mines that float from odessa to the bosphorus, of course useless, but especially such a mechanism, how to open the ports anyway, and even more so, the russians, you know , have been saying for the last two days, they have been saying, but no, there is nothing, there is a humanitarian corridor, it can mean that traveling is a threat to them, and secondly, they already are several ships, civilian ships, which they hit, and of course they are not going to unblock them, that is, i am talking about the fact that there will definitely not be a direct military operation, but it is possible to come up with such a scheme as to not give the russians the opportunity to actually aim at kyiv let's say these dry cargoes that can enter from our parties , and definitely the role of international organizations here is primarily the un, which was not, well, ineffective, unable to do anything, it is

definitely increasing, and here you can try to find a scheme to release it, because definitely the logistical problem is that to what extent i know that according to ukrainian calculations, we can export to foreign markets only 20% of the grain that was previously exported through our black sea ports, because we have logistics too. this is the difference in ruts, ruts, widths, etc. of course, there are other expediencies of things, that's why we'll say that there's actually no way to push further . since you are on their territory, then we are going to take such and such a step and in order to unblock e-e ukrainian ports and to alleviate hunger and we will

say to impose such and such sanctions on your e energy sector until you stop this destructive activities in relation to ukraine and the world oleksandr of foreign and security policy of the center of defense strategies thank you for being with us thank you very much and we now have an expert effect express yes or not yet i don't know i think there is not yet but there is already there ivan krychevskyi , defense-express health expert, mr. ivan , how much does this name mean to you? it's beautiful, and there is such a word express. and today anzhelika asks when it will end, and with a hint that it should end quickly, you confirm

p because we are not experts that the fracture will be in june and june is already in a few days, it will still be 30 days, the beginning. i think it may be the beginning of june, and the end will be before you at the end of july, and that will be in august today. how much is this justified optimism is not justified well, i personally think that such optimism is still justified, but here i tend to rely on the statements of the minister of defense oleksiy reznikov, who made such an interesting innovation that he said until the next meeting in rammstein he is going to definitely share his colleagues with colleagues, how did their wudergafs work on the battlefield in ukraine, especially since we are now receiving such possibly small batches, but there is already a lot of interesting stuff from the most interesting, the latest

that poland gives us uh, 18 snort howitzers that have a firing range of 40 km, then three batteries such self-propelled howitzers on such a specific, specific section of the front, it will be possible to quickly throw in russian artillery, create conditions for a counteroffensive, we have a lot of interesting things, the only one is imperceptibly but definitely so significantly i will send armed forces, so let's hope that nothing will break the natural and course of things, according to which there really should be a break at the front in june, but what is a break, let's explain. this is military terminology without military secrets , please. i'm watching here. and what a day the russians are trying to take severodonetsk and luckily they don't succeed , especially if there is news today that they have pushed back the invaders near the strategically important route that

connects liman and bakhmut. the very fact that pushed back, and plus the fact that our troops switched to local counter-insurgency operations in the southern direction in the kherson region, there they are going in the direction of snow river, roughly speaking, they are going in the direction of kherson itself . to counteroffensive actions without massive supplies from lend-lease, the khimars have not yet arrived, some armored vehicles from the reserves of nato countries have not yet arrived, and they are already moving to the counteroffensive, and once already let's say so, eh of the minister of defense, varshikov took the courage to make such a promise that in the next rammstein he will bury how it all worked, well, that is, let 's still get out of this order of things, you run, let's say something, please, they are 300 km away

, it's definitely important what uh, 300 km. this is if there will be a tactical missile of the otakan type, a tactical missile, well, something like our point, oh, but pretending to have a longer firing range. and yes, if there are simply guided rockets, it’s 110 km away. they have such two unified systems are you khimars and m270, they shoot the same types of rockets and can launch both of them with the same otakans missile system. constantly, i blow up the kremlin, practice on the bridge, and then direct it to the kremlin, you practice on it on something more interesting, on the

railway of which the tanks and dry temporarily occupied crimea are transported to melitopol, so be it. yes , it will be much more sensual for the occupiers right now, we will always have time to demolish the crimean bridge. let's do better, if we have the resources, it's better to use them one by one for strikes against infrastructure objects. i talked to people there, they say oh, we are afraid of an attack by russians from belarus from the north. and i say well, listen. and i say. why are you afraid, because the ukrainian forces are scattered? people in the army are needed, even if they recruit them, they need to be trained for a month, two, three, and so on, and so on, that is, what i see now on the fronts. there

the russian front bends a little in the south. we only see in luhansk oblast and donetsk oblast, there are indeed problems in ukraine. the ukrainian troops are constantly bending over there , then we push them back, then they beat us, that's all, in principle, it's already that. equilibrium, if there are problems , yes or no, it's us after all equilibrium and a russian breaking down, and the fact that the russians began to break down, we can infer from such a simple fact, according to some data, the russians, uh, the previous two days, used not even tactical aviation for strikes on the front, yes, and the same point u missiles or type 22 missiles from these bombers of the type here 22m3 you know, just the fact that they decided to

shoot precisely such missiles at objects in the pro-front zone of the missiles, which have a range of 600 km in soviet times, they were stamped for the destruction of us aircraft carriers, now go for that to be used to try to hit some of our strongholds if the russians have switched to such methods. well, there they try to bend our front line and break through and they don’t succeed. i still strongly assess that it’s more likely that the russians started having real problems there and it’s just that i have to give credit how is it? well, what about russian? you will be beyond the limits of the strength and endurance of our troops, who are outnumbered by the russians there, but believe me, after all, the russians have started having problems there because, do you know wait, wait, this weapon is used in close combat, well, conditionally, it shows you instead of 600 km. this is what i want to translate your words into a general

understanding that they no longer have enough of those weapons at a short distance, they are forced to use weapons that were not produced at all for the purpose of fighting in the severodonetsk direction, and in order to shoot at nato boats, rather, they had a moral breakdown, they have enough weapons for close combat, and what kind of motley to take into battle, they have enough there, maybe they saw her brought out the essence of the so-called bmpt-terminators, although they are different machines in some ways, but they brought out even this here . the question is that the russians themselves are morally broken. well, it is simply a shame for the russian army that they created all these tank columns, calculating that they are there as e- it’s not a hot knife, the oil is supposed to flow there and come out on the dolamach, but instead they rested on severodonetsk and for 80 days they can’t take one city, and it’s a relatively small one. well, here under severodonetsk, in principle, the whole concept breaks down

of the military power of the russian federation p. ivan it is also interesting, tell me the equipment and weapons of the russian federation. does it end there? is there any, tell me, and they can restore it now because there were chances imposed, certain spare parts are impossible now for the russian federation to purchase. well, weapons in general. they well, not only did they produce it themselves, they bought from them, there is another possibility, or not, theoretically, they can repair some of their cars there using the method of cannibalism of spare parts, that is, when from a faulty tank some knots are removed there and put on the tank that will restore combat capability there, there was a message, it seems, at the end or the beginning of may or even at the end of april that they overtook the ural wagon factory there, an echelon of the newest tanks, this is a 90 m breakthrough. maybe they made this helmet out of the old ones stocks, but the fact that the ural wagon went to the factory of the main manufacturer of tanks in the russian federation broke into a corkscrew and i can

no longer produce a new one, because this is confirmed immediately from several e-e open sources with the aviation technology with the production of missile systems can and then everything. moreover, there was even such an example on open sources of humor, it gave such a concise form that we found that in missiles of the type has 101 or helicopters of the type k-52 , electronics of american production are used if expand it in more detail, roughly speaking, american-made electronics that were probably found somewhere in a garbage dump in china, because the chips are so ancient from companies that have long since closed down, and put it in a combat helicopter, well, that's the russians had to be able to do it and it looks like they don't know how to do it anymore thank you thank you mr. ivan it was very interesting to hear from you there will be no express but slow progress will be absolutely me but yes

, we are the only ones, the only ones we can solve are already known in advance, so what everything else loses order. well, ivan just reminded me of this classic by von clause, who said that no matter what it was, well, then there were no such weapons at all, then there were horses, yes, it was the first half of the 19th century, but until the foot of a soldier became a warrior not on enemy land there is no victory, and here is a very interesting moment. many years have passed, even hundreds of years, and we see that the endurance of ukrainian soldiers standing on their land destroys all these huge numbers of tanks with rockets, whatever, and this universal phrase turns out to be working in 50 and 100 years and in 150 years and in 200 years, how are we

now that we have gone through what is emotional, and you know , the one who has some emotional ground under him will win over the one who does not have that ground but can have 150 sabers and run and swing and fan and everyone will be afraid, but one ukrainian will stand. and i’m not afraid, and somehow it’s starting to not work. by the way, in this context, we discussed with you that everyone has their own victory, for someone, the victory will come at the turn of february 24, february 23 , 2022. but this is without crimea, even without a part of donetsk and luhansk regions , it will be a victory for someone if we take only crimea and return all our territories.

to be a victory because for ukrainians very often a victory is that we go to the russians and defeat them and win and go somewhere for some purpose, well, for some purpose. yes , i don’t know the border of ukraine, but for example, world history knows a lot of cases when the enemy’s army starts to turn around and run for the wrong reason that the ukrainians and because they are inside something they settled with a general, the general wanted to shoot the officer, the officer said i won't give in, i'll kill you myself, then some soldiers there started to get nervous and, well, you know, world war i. actually, that's how it ended, just people turned around from the front and left and that's it and it's all over now there are also rejections but not massive things it's constantly changing all the time then we go

forward a little bit then we retreat they advance we are all nervous they are in the palm of their hands they say mr. president putin we will put khohlov here now then on on the contrary, it's all very much the same every day, everyone can give some other emphasis for an hour that we have to remember that it's not two or three weeks there, everything is exactly as we were told at first by well-known bloggers, but hmm, now they say that it is necessary we must wait for victory wait yes. we are taking up the time of our viewers who wrote their questions. we will answer them. i do not believe that several american intelligence agencies do not know about the atrocities of the russians in the occupied territories, and this does not prevent world leaders from taking care of putin's face. schultz and macron called putin again. will everything work out in moscow again? out of hand, if europe is so dependent on the russian empire, should ukraine think about joining the european union

, lend-lease has already worked in real life, or only on paper, as the union of england, poland and ukraine believes it can be as he thinks it is probably effective, several questions at once agreed no more than forty questions from one person has no more than 40% at once. if europe is dependent on the russian horde, should ukraine think about joining the european union, no, if ukraine wants to live like europeans, if it wants to have such a university and such roads, such hospitals, if it wants to have such a salary, such houses, well, you can list such jeans in the end, yes maybe there is a sense of thinking about europe above all questions for children further further further further yes and then maybe it's not, europeans don't need ukraine. it seems to me that ukrainians need to be like europeans, and there is already a large part of ukrainians who are already europeans, not all of them, but they already are. therefore, this should be kept

in mind. well, let's not go to europe. where should we go to africa? to asia, where, where, with whom, we will unite, think today immediately, england , poland-ukraine, there still seems to be turkey possible. they are from the eu they still want to be leaders, i see options here, no, no, ukrainian, any ukrainian political force will somehow forget about nato and remember this balto, british, many, british-ukrainian alliance, i don't, i don't think so, if it doesn't interfere with each other, why not? after all, i would put joining nato and the european ones in the first place. so it will be possible and yes and yes

yes, the british umbrella is not so reliable , the american umbrella is, look how they help us more than anyone can they help as much as they want, but america is a superpower and britain is just big. yes, we are now talking about the european union. yes, i understand. i want it not only to be about the european union . preparing reforms, all this must be done, but first, second, third, nato, nato, and yes, lend-lease is already working in real life. is it only on paper ? nafiga, if it is only on paper, we need it then. today, we devoted the entire program to it. that the supply of weapons is not so fast, you heard from the experts how it is, uh, now we have a message

that supplies have started via the sea. and now you have to choose either time or quantity . the path must be chosen either we take very few weapons very quickly but or a lot of weapons but very slowly and these weapons for the railway are constantly in danger russia fires missiles at the railway tracks therefore but the forest is nothing else but simply the right of the president to quickly find money without consulting the congress and use this money to purchase american weapons for ukraine, and that’s how it is, in the same

issue, we didn’t touch on the topic of scholse macron, they called putin again, well, you mean, audience member, the diplomatic way to resolve the war with putin, or should it be used, well, definitely all ways are good if they if they persuade him to stop the war it's bad the whole world works like this it doesn't happen that way, then you don't have to call . if you immediately take a position of intransigence during your call, no one will talk to you, not even putin. he considers himself a great uncle in world politics. people who are for sanctions, people who are using weapons and people who say let me just name putin, the fersteiners

who understand putin, they understand putin , they have their own french people, they just love russians, i don’t understand why the germans feel guilty for the first and second world wars, because the whole world says that russia won, how many countries were stalin ? they have already removed the name of kyivan rus, they simply left russia in order to er-er already tie it to themselves, although it is absolutely clear that it will take a long time until there are no

associations in the world that, for example, among the victorious countries in the second world war, russia defeated hitler britain and the united states. they will not say the ussr, which of the 15 republics plus or autonomy and so on, that is, the whole world already knows thanks to russia itself, they will still be like this for a very long time. this public consciousness is so very messy. what are they writing there, only the script when in 96 ichkeria won the war , there was a complete withdrawal of the russians, the amount of chechnya's independence was preserved, and after a few years, russia attacked again, experts say that if irreparable losses are not inflicted now, there will be a new war , or someone says in two years, someone says in five, someone says after 10, but for now this splinter in the form of ukraine in the imagination of russians is at the foot of russia and is

constantly there. for them, our mere existence irritates us, our breath, our face, our heart, our mind, our rule of life, our love of freedom, there are people, we are all an object something something that needs to be destroyed so we can move somewhere in the territory of switzerland, you know, which is surrounded by mountains and it is quite difficult to get to it yes, but it is so expensive, i don't know what to do with these things, ukraine came there, so the chocolate was delicious right away dear, when i was traveling there, i think it's a joke , it's our territory, it's our land, and we don't want to move. we want to destroy russia so that it doesn't touch us, well, we wanted to live peacefully, we

didn't want to eliminate it before that, but russia doesn't know how live peace, i agree, let's ask the next question , and the question concerns the same thing, after our victory, the complete withdrawal of russian troops from ukraine, that the russians would attack us again in the future, are there such guarantees in 5 - 10, 20, 50 years, very simple, these sanctions, which are many quite a few ukrainians are so critical, and because ukrainians really want everything and immediately, they didn't give these sanctions for a year, they didn't give them for three, and when russia starves, it will become poor, when will all the consequences begin to have a serious impact. i think forever i think forever the world i think it will not allow this to be caught again, therefore, there will always be people in the world besides this putin fersteiner,

there will be people who will. well, let's order again, do you want another war ? the 90s and russia played very well, that we are good. i am not the same with the trams, they are not aggressive. then there was the 14th year from ukraine and everyone thought well, well, okay 14 - this is taken out in principle, they already understood that it is not possible to act like this well and what do we have today, how many times should we make an exception? it was a mistake not only, well, our situation is logical, but also all the countries of europe and the united states of america should sit separately and make a program on who was wrong where ? and i have the impression that the whole world for some reason i believed, well, civilized people generally believe

other people, and this may be the main mistake when you are walking down the street and a well-dressed bandit comes around the corner. man, wait a minute, i still have an important question , president volodymyr zelenskyi said that ukraine was offered to evacuate people to dig trenches a year ago, but this led to panic and the destruction of the country's economy, he told the dutch please tell the publication whether, in your opinion , zelensky did the right thing, that at least let 's not do the radar, don't evacuate people, maybe it really was a panic, it would have stopped the economy, he said . didn't invest more in the army, for example, i would say that using two letters , but i try not to discuss it,

where i would, because no one knows . anyway, no one knows what happened. not a single person . we can't imagine. no one has a time machine. we unscrewed it on may 27, 2021 and did the experiment again. some analysis and then i will be very convinced that it will be a wrong analysis everyone listen, i'm watching now