of these words, but the answer at the official level of ukraine is given to the highest level of the president of ukraine and, in principle, the official position is now to read because we see how those who are trying to build bridges are located. as we know between the zelenskyi putin and the president of turkey, the president of turkey, the president of her party, announced the negotiations by phone with the presidents of ukraine and russia, zelensky with putin literally today, may 30, it will obviously be two completely separate conversations, reports the director of communication relations of the administration the president of turkey, turkey is very interesting to us in the context of the fact that precisely in this connection may lie, as i believe, the key to unlocking ukrainian ports and ukrainian seas and removing from the agenda at least for a while the food crisis in the world and our exports, this is also important for us danger, we understand that ukraine is now needed by the world international

community as a tool with which they are going to overcome the food crisis, of course export of grain is extremely important for us, but from the second side, well, it is not possible to unblock the black sea ports, it cannot be unblocked, the proteazov sea, let’s take care of it for now , unfortunately, unfortunately, for now, and the black sea region, eh, we can achieve a result, it’s really strange , because eh, if you take those things that are installed in the world, that’s it freedom of navigation , even the wars that were fought, they did not create this blockade for this purpose. russia is deliberately doing this, and russia is making this a tool to frighten with the holocaust in order to remove the castle. well, i don't know, the holodomor, so you corrected me correctly

well, that is, a great famine. yes, which can be in some regions, they use it in some , yes, that is, in israel, of course, there are other supplies, but such countries, which had a holocaust in their time, can also be precisely the objects of these problems, which is why this problem global and they want to solve it at the expense of e-e unblocking the supply of ukrainian grain, that is, but the path they chose was for russia to allow it, that is, russia laid mines in ukraine in the sea, ukraine must demine it , after that they will ask russia whether you will let ships, and russia will say remove our sanctions, we will then think, well, this is not the right way. and why can’t they make escort convoys? by the way, today will be a fun conversation, i don’t know how public it was, when she used the name of the turkish president, khrystyna hinted

at so to speak president erdoğan's double bookkeeping yes, mr. ambassadors, look, i think that what we said is in the conversation, after all, i hope that there will be talk of prisoners and that president erdoğan has a successful previous experience maybe not everything was successful, for example, to take it from mariupol, the offer was a turkish ship, well , you know that russia rejected it, but there is another experience, so i really hope that there will be an exchange of prisoners. -th implementation is absolutely allowed of international law , i.e. freedom of navigation, where there will still be control and support, if not by countries too much, then the country has some special mission of the european union, perhaps such proposals are put forward by individual eu countries will now be considered in brussels. the

next question arises - will this really ensure this issue of the bosphorus passage of ships? that is, well, everything can be solved in principle, if there was courage , political will and an approach that does not succumb to russian blackmail. if it were so, i would think this is a more realistic way than uh, there is someone there again for the 15th time to look into the eyes of the train you are about blackmail on the part of the russian federation, the importance of the fact that you, in particular , the turkish leadership is preferably not recently, it became clear that the president of turkey rajab and his portuguese are actually announcing such a special military operation that will also apply to syria in particular, someone accepted this , again, with fate, they say erdogan is actually threatening putin to open a

second front there and so i will ask valeria whether the story of this possible special operation can become an argument in erdoğan's conversation with putin when it comes to ukraine . that ukraine will contain russia at the same time, keeps its resources on itself and distracts, gives the opportunity to other countries to realize some of their intentions and national interests that they have been really worried about russia's reactions, this and finland, sweden's change of neutrality to join nato, this is turkey, a new stage if ensuring one's security and actions in syria, so i would say that i would very much like ukraine and stopping the

war, defense and the occupation to be a priority and not some other issues, although this is also a challenge do you understand these things, first of all, they are about ukraine, i would like you to finally explain comrade lavrov's strange application, therefore, according to him, the obvious task is to push the ukrainian army and battalions beyond the borders of the donetsk and luhansk regions, the capture of those regions is an absolute priority in relation to the rest of the territory where people live who do not want to develop ties with russia, the population of these regions will decide, i.e. the impression is that they have greatly reduced the level of their global appetites, in particular the occupation of ukraine this is exactly the case with the concentration camps and all other accompanying moments of the occupation russian regime, well, the goal, unfortunately, has not changed - it is, after all, controlled by this ukraine and as far as

possible, but statements yes, we feel such signals that our defense is powerful, it basically changes they have to explain something inside russia. why did this uh-uh, such a successful special operation turn into a defeat for russia? it is clear that the strategic goals have not been achieved. well, i paid attention to this statement, but you know, lavrov, that declares one thing today, tomorrow another, that is, it is serious to treat this, that right there, their position is clearly the same, and they really have already narrowed the donbas. to be well, we all already understood here stops can only be done by force thank you thank you comprehensive analysis on the air of the espresso tv channel

valery chaliy extraordinary and plenipotentiary ambassador of ukraine ex-ambassador of ukraine to the united states worked on the live broadcast of the information marathon of our tv channel and now we add to your small background the people's deputy of ukraine kirurudyk who is in the capital of great britain glory to ukraine mrs. rudyk glory greetings so, of course, we would like to ask you, well, first of all, about boris johnson's proposal, so to speak, to create some kind of alternative association between ukraine great britain in the security sphere, of course, if it does not harm our integration with the nato bloc and the european union, you know, there are so many things happening now, and i would like us to

spoke very clearly about what exactly ukraine needs now today will be considered if the issues of the sixth package of sanctions from the european union are not already being considered e-e this is a very difficult issue and very painful for us because you see that they are still trying to allow the druzhba oil pipeline 20% of oil will still be pumped, and we can not ignore this issue and we must concentrate on it. the second issue is the unblocking of the ports. my meeting with the representatives of the british parliament will take place in a few hours. by the ellwood association and the people's deputies who are engaged in security and defense, the issues related to the unblocking of the ports will naturally be

raised as one of the key issues, this is what should happen now, you know, the general task that we have as a country is to unblock against not because everything the world needs grain, and because ukraine needs it first and foremost, and to do it on the conditions that are needed specifically by us and not by other countries, the third issue that we are considering and what we will raise is still the provision of weapons by great britain to ukraine activities are rockets, 270 rocket systems, this should also happen as soon as possible, adding to this package more negotiations and ideas that mr. johnson is now issuing. well, i think it is a scattering of those forces, which we have so little. let's eat this elephant in parts and already er work has been going on for a long time, statements about possible

associations have been going on for a long time, you remember great britain, poland-ukraine, it's a good idea, but those countries that would like to help us help, and those that don't want to don't help, and here's the question i don't think there is any formalized alliance now. i want to remind you that ukraine and help to ukraine is primarily a map of the struggle in domestic politics for all politicians and for johnson, ilya biden, and for macron, and for the sun, and there is even a reprimand where there are any advantages of which country will receive thanks to the fact that its leader supports ukraine, they allow him to feel more calm and free inside the country, especially when here and there i definitely agree that the issue of ukraine has now established a certain moral a bar for a politician below which he cannot fall,

otherwise he simply won't be understood there, i don't know, german, austrian, czech, whether these or other voters from the other side, we understand how much we need heavy weapons now, and we are helped by great britain, we are helped by the united states , even poland is helping us with the czech republic yes, but there is still a part of the state that promises to help us, but beyond the false promises, unfortunately, it does not work. do we have any tools to make them adhere to their own public word ? tools are exclusively public because well, we can not force the countries that promise us weapons and send helmets to send weapons in the end, there are no such tools, these tools are public and political, there are other tools. unfortunately, salt has not yet been invented, and since i have these countries in the

military alliance well, they don't owe us anything, they can simply support us because it's profitable for them. our task is to always make it politically profitable, that's why we keep our attention on ukraine all the time, we're chained, we work so that the voters of these countries know and understand what is happening, this is the work on the information front that is being carried out by our policies that are being conducted by our public figures that our embassies will provide. in great britain, for ukrainians, this is one of the topics of their conversations with politicians and government officials. there are currently approximately 20,000 people who are waiting to receive a british visa. britain declares that they are one of our closest allies and that is why i do not i understand if we do not have a visa to the european union

, we have an easier visa procedure for the united states, we have an easier one and they canceled visas to canada , so why does great britain keep all these bureaucratic procedures for our er refugees er to the united kingdom is not a country of first choice this is not a country to which they immediately decided to go. because it is expensive enough here and it is far away, and there are other countries that are not much more attractive, so in my conversations today it will sound like we need to cancel visas or at least simplify them in such a way that it is no longer a problem that now it really is. well, such a big nuisance and i met with the ukrainian diaspora here, i met with ukrainian refugees and i can tell you that this is one of the questions that they are very worried about. i just wanted to correct that in the end, with canada, we do not have such a complete visa-free regime as with the european union, but the procedure for ukrainians to enter the territory of this country has become much simpler, this

is important, see, all countries have simplified the procedure for ukrainians to enter them all those who support us have taken this step - it is the right and bureaucratic important step to support our country and our people now with regard to heavy weapons eh great britain is determined to provide us with as many weapons as we will need, unfortunately as always there are many obstacles which are both political and and organizational and our task now as politicians is to identify these obstacles and reduce them there as much as possible , please hint where those obstacles are hidden or to look for them in the united kingdom or to look for them god forbid in ukraine or somewhere on the route. well, if they are ready, then we need it on the route , and the involvement of britain in the union with germany and

france, these are precisely the beliefs that are on the route, i am really interested in what they think about er let's say our domestic politics now er, in particular our european partners, do they even look at this whole situation because well, one way or another, but er, politics is alive in ukraine, which personally makes me very happy , at least because ah hmm, she is not so mausoleum as for the russian federation, in the end we have but that didn't last long, three channels were turned off. and they are explained, even though he supposedly had the right to access this information , what about the questionnaire, how it was filled out by the ukrainian side, and many such nuances, such as i'm interested in general, are they somehow disturbing or, let's say, rocking the process of our partners, or do they think

it's okay, they'll deal with it, but then after the war, er, today, just before our broadcast, i finished a big meeting in er, very respectable henry jackson sucks in london here, where there were thinkers , economists, politicians, former government officials from great britain, there were about 200 people, and i want to tell you that one of the questions in the hall was about how i managed to leave ukraine and whether it is true that the opposition politicians from ukraine are not released, i explained that we hope that president zelenskyi's entourage will do him a very bad service by not releasing opposition politicians such as petro oleksiiovych from ukraine, or at least makes it impossible or puts certain obstacles it's wrong it's completely undemocratic it's illegal and it's harming our country because i'll tell you clearly no politician

currently working abroad says anything bad about the country or the president not a single word we're all working for one thing to get more weapons to get more support to get more emotions about ukraine so that we can continue the fight and reduce our capabilities as a country in this way well it is at least unreasonable but i am disturbing you the situation is called shooting oneself in the foot, in your opinion, what is hidden behind such facaps? anyway, in the end, they were taken and released, but before that there was a scandal of half the world, eh. i think that this is again a matter of the president's entourage. i don't believe that the president himself could give such an order, i think that now he is focused on much more important issues for the country, but the fact remains a fact and right now, probably the best thing

the president could do is to give someone the task of investigating what happened, why and to make it so that this has never happened again. thank you for panicking . i would also like to clarify, and maybe you still have some such behind-the-scenes messages from the capital of foggy albion. that is, to spread them. i know that they exist and the people's people's deputy of ukraine worked live. military key moments , in particular some what happened happened in the last day, contact us ivan krychevskyi, an expert of defense express, we welcome you, mr. ivan, thank you for joining the broadcast glory to ukraine glory to the heroes good afternoon, what is the situation in the direction of luhansk, lysichansk, severodonetsk, information about the fact that there is fighting on the outskirts of this city, in part, i do not know to what extent, but the occupiers

still managed to take some positions there, in the end, the city, which i understand, is still under control on the other hand, the ukrainian military situations in lysychansk are completely under our control, nevertheless, please outline the trends that are currently taking place in that direction. i personally tend to believe that in the case of serodonetsk, our the command chose the option to involve the russians in street battles and wear them out there, you know when they just started talking about the counteroffensive, which should lead to the liberation of all territories , they forgot to inform one important thing. the counteroffensive begins with the fact that the enemy must be disabled in a series of long defensive fights, respectively, this is exactly what is happening in the entire unit. do you first discuss the possibility that the armed forces of ukraine will withdraw from the north of donetsk in order to preserve our group, but then someone in one thing i mentioned is that there is an airfield there that the

russians can potentially use. even if several helicopters are placed there in the sanitary facilities. therefore, it is obvious that such a decision was made, that on the one hand, in order to get the airfield under our control, on the other hand, in order to maximize to wear out the russians in street battles that they themselves do not want, that is why the decision was made to give them a fight there. moreover, there are already the first reports that i am already the first, the first russians disposed of during the street battles, i am already the first prisoners therefore, for the time being, our command controls the situation there, and there are no prerequisites for this control to be brought in. the ministry of defense has now received a statement. the fighting in the east has reached its maximum intensity. i don't even know where to go. well, but now the situation, as far as we understand, is critical, what are the other reserves?

the russian interventionists have so much and how much prospect do we have in general to stop their barrage of fire because, unfortunately, only a part of the american howitzers reached the position on one side so as not to say that there are only them part arrived at the position, a lot of things arrived for the other side, i agree with your electric question , anchor even more intense if yes, when the enemy tries to take two of our important cities and there already in two cities he got stuck in street battles because if liman is also so that the orkes are not fully controlled, but we part of the estuary is controlled by the armed forces of ukraine, it turns out that there are two heavy street battles in two cities. well, this is the current conditions to examine. how truly fierce the battles are . if we talk about the reserves of the russians on the one hand they can actually transfer scrap metal there, you know, until they really clean

all their bases to zero, there is a report that the russians have already transferred under 100 tanks and 62 of these old ones to the front somewhere in the south, but they have already reached such reserves there. well they use those reserves as dug-in new positions, we understand that, that is, in the morning there was a message that in the direction of zaporozhye they decided to go on the attack, what is this sound, we will move on. i would like to clarify something in order to understand the situation along the estuary, that is, we have the strategic importance of this city. as far as i understand, the enemy from the raisin side will be able to pull up their capabilities accordingly through the liman to the luhansk region. if i am not mistaken, the truth is exactly that way and exactly. perhaps because we control the liman, what is the fact that we can, in the event of what, cross the russians have already managed to press their supplies there, but they just took liman , but they can't advance until they

completely take control of the city. i don't know the danger for slavyansk in the near future, so and kramatorsk in the future, which everything depends on how they will be sharpened, because there are elements, because in the morning they were really brought to the general staff, there was a message that the russians are regrouping there to come to the offensive, but to regroup and move. it's a little bit like that, you know, two different processes, it's like that, so it's extremely important clarification: ivan, we would like to ask you to analyze the operational situation in the south, in particular, we are talking about the kherson region, you know, there is a similar situation in that in the south, the voroshitas decided to finally kill themselves in our defense themselves, that is, instead of doing the sensible thing, take the same t-62s, their old bmps, dig in, dig the front, build this very third line of defense

, which they talked about as a condition. -1 there is a t-62, and on the other side they are raising their latest su-35s fighters for air cover. well, here is the result in three days, the second downed 135 s-roshest fighter, the newest , again, there is also a report that our troops moved to local counteroffensive actions in the direction of kherson, according to some reports, we advanced only 10 km, but this was already enough according to the estimates of the american institute for the study of war, or at least they postponed their messages there about their intentions about the actual annexation of kherson oblast, remember that at first there, some streamousov declared that almost tomorrow the region will be annexed to the russian federation. and

today it is possible that the referendum will be held in a year. the territory is undisputed. you know, even a rhetorical question will come out, but if our armed forces advance another 10 km e, then what will be the loud voice will personally pack the suitcases together with his gang there, well, that is also a good rhetorical question about the prospects for the liberation of kherson, the city, the capital of the kherson region, which is under occupation, we understand that there is no so-called water line that could protect their line of defense, but still they dug in there very well. well, on the one hand , yes, they dug in very well from the russians they transfer their reserves of the temporarily occupied crimea to this direction, even there they remove their equipment from the storage bases, but again, i will repeat myself somewhere there, this passage already said that there

would be, you understand, if the russians would try this armor and equipment there and the defense yes and wait to leave until we are to spend shells to break through it, so they try to wear us out with continuous attacks on it, but at the same time they lose their offensive potential, so let's put it this way, i wouldn't stand on one side i would like to be more careful with forecasts from the other side, uh, in my opinion, there is no reason to believe that the russians have dug themselves in there and we will not get out of there, what is the situation with the snake island ? to plant someone, build something and unload it, in which situation we can say that it is not developing very well. what data is there that the russians have installed at least two installations there, e-e bm-21 grad?

installations the russians can theoretically use to shoot at civilian ships well, at first there was a concept that theoretically the russians could put the mkh-35u missile base on the snake anti-ship complex, there the firing range is about 260 km and this would make any unblocking of the ports impossible in principle, the russians decided there evaluated their efforts, it is clear that their complex can cover them there and put something smaller but no less dangerous, the danger here is that not only that the russians can theoretically shoot on ships carrying grain from romanian ports with our grain yes, but because the harpoons from the western allies are no longer enough here, we need a full-fledged operation, that is, which would have an air component, let's say there were overlaps from the shore, cover without the sea, well, this makes it an order of magnitude more difficult for us the situation in this region

, accordingly, there is already reason to even say that just give us harpoons, we will unblock everything ourselves, so there will be no prospects, in your opinion , of using the northern russian group in belarus is continuing some regular mobilization exercises, but the most important thing is that they have moved from kandera to the brest region of belarus. most likely, they are pursuing the task of distracting our forces because, on the one hand, there are many such threatening indicators there . or remove the equipment from storage, because they buy these, tell me, identification tokens and move the same scanners, set the same border regime in the brest region well, but on the other hand eh, it turns out that if the russian garrison there remained at the minimum level, there are not even any planes there, those combat planes, radar patrol planes, there are iskanders, it is obvious

that belarusian border guards are already being recruited to protect the canders. all the more so that lukashenko, after all, until the 15th year, he systematically destroyed the army, he spent one and a half percent, if we said before 2014 that we were destroying the army, then what can we say i don't even know about lukashenka, more about the fact that he doesn't have an army, again, he served the army for five years, you know, the local task is to repel a hypothetical russian invasion, to build something there, he even tries to sell to the russian federation, and in the sense of his weapons, there was such an innovation rather, anti-aircraft missiles and anti-tank missiles, this is another important indicator that here they are selling their ammunition and you will prepare for something. thank you for the rhetorical question and we conclude with them god bless the conversation with you and his experts as always