the right of citizens to self-defense is properly guaranteed, and here actually keinenka also convinces me that we have problems with this, because no matter how active a person is in his civil activity, he has the right to life and self-defense if he is a person armed men attack. she defends her life. and after that, they don’t have half a life and still have to drag around the courts. actually, that’s the way it is. it’s definitely necessary here to limit large rifled weapons, which it’s obvious that many people want to have. war veterans after this war, we will also have a lot of veterans and other matters - this is this civilian weapon, it is short-barreled, it's a little different story, but that's actually what it is, if the state is afraid of the citizens, it will be accordingly. she will also put some sticks in the wheels in the process. well, and the

comment. is it possible to be like this? well, we actually have more chronicles of the information war with olga len, but she in our colleague olga len is already ready to talk about the main things that happened on on the information front these days olga, i am asking you for a word congratulations congratulations maria andrii well, really, i will now talk about the main topic that is currently being discussed in general in the world and the main topic of russian propaganda these weeks, so in a moment we will start after the davos forum. minister of foreign affairs dmytro kuleba wrote in social networks about the narratives of russian propaganda, which these weeks are actively spreading rap in the world through their agents of influence and sympathizers, for the first time ukraine resists because the west will throw it at us anyway

the second such narrative is allowed - ukraine drew the world's attention away from the solution of other problems, the third sanctions against the russian federation created a food crisis, that is, the fact that the russian federation bombs ukrainian ports, granaries and fields does not interfere, but sanctions interfere and finally and why is ukraine so desperate resistance, causing such terrible suffering to his own people and his country, if the war is so difficult, if everything is so bad, then it is necessary to sit down and negotiate , the journalist of the cnbc tv channel het-legembu asked dmytro kulibu if the world should pay the food crisis and the increase in energy prices, the fact that ukraine does not want to cede its territories to russia. in fact, this is also the same as asking why you all do not die so that our prices do not rise. regarding the latter, an absent discussion between the two patriarchs of global politics, george soros and henry kissinger

george soros emphasized the invasion could be the beginning of the third world war and our civilization may not survive it the best and probably the only way to save our civilization as soon as possible to defeat putin, in his opinion, a truce is unattainable and ukraine has a chance to win, henrik and sanger, on the contrary, said that negotiations should begin in the next two months . henriker is valued in russia as a person who is absolutely authoritative, smart, and knowledgeable in politics. and east europe and russia, maybe nato and

again odkb, but let's go back to december, which seems to us to be simple and from the second era, and quite recently russia proposed exactly the same thing, well, the reaction of russian television to these debates was very stormy and typical the rhetoric is so very, very strange, but look, especially because it is very demonstrative that we have people voes on and the presentation of the lord's sauce is the speech of god's biden and here, uh, it comes to the mind of the general a warrior hoverla gerontocracy we knew gerontocracy, the soviet gerontogrady of anecdotes and warmongering, to some extent dangerous for the development of one's own state , but on the whole not dangerous for the world. the rest of the world 40 191 directly master 40 is already trying to

practically drag ukraine into that world nancy saw 89 we also know the hidden aggressor of biden 99 years ago, only he himself spoke yes, eh, that is, only he is capable of this strategic thinking, but with a delay of a few months, because the security guarantee was necessary, of course, he spoke earlier for the sake of justice . because uh, i want to ask. well , where is russia being dragged by their rather old president, and well, uh, the problem is that the messenger's statements are not a single speech, earlier the new york times published an article on the war in ukraine complicated while america is not ready for the editorial expressed very similar opinions and called on ukraine to pressure our government to make

painful territorial decisions experts loyal to russia became more active around the world the french intelligence research center published an analytical report in which the kremlin-kremlin narratives were partially promoted about the inexperienced ukrainian soldiers and the professional russian army, ex-us senator black said in an interview that russia cannot afford to lose due to the threat of nato expansion, the italian general trikariko called on the eu to give up the crazy idea of ​​winning in ukraine, to induce ukraine to capitulate, so as not to provoke russia into an event, they were voiced in a discussion of the german schiller institute, the former prime minister of japan, a pre-trial detention center, to accuse volodymyr zelenskyi, who allegedly promised russia not to join the nato should have granted autonomy to the donetsk and luhansk regions so that there would be no war, why are the pro-russian forces active

now ? for the past few weeks, i have directly participated in many of these international discussions. i congratulate you, can you hear me? good morning. please tell me what the appearance of these statements now shows. why did such an active attack begin at this time? - firstly, russia is trying to open all its canned goods, which it has in educational institutions, in order to somehow reverse the situation, and secondly, this is superimposed on the already declining wave of support for ukraine. i mean, you won't get used to it, even to get used to it, because, you know

, the human consciousness cannot stay in such a critical state for a very long time, especially if it's not your own country, but countries that are neighboring or across the ocean or far away, so they try they understood very clearly that for the first time in weeks and months when support for ukraine is the highest, simply no one would not have heard these calls, now they these calls somehow stood out against the background of the great support for ukraine, that's why they are here they still try to sell such messages to themselves, firstly, this is the beginning of negotiations on their terms, and secondly, this indicates that they are still not very successful, and they admit this due to the fact of such negotiations on battlefield because we understand it that russia

invites negotiations only when they are not very good on the military in the military plan . these are the reasons for today. but in principle, you had the opportunity to communicate with american politicians in the near future. what is your impression, eh? widespread there really is a point of view kissing sources or still closer to the point of view no no absolutely and indeed i will be there two days ago we met with united states congressmen from both parties and republicans and democrats and both sides emphasized that it is absolutely some kind of marginal vision that is not supported in any party, moreover, in any of the palaces, not all nations, not in the congress, that is, i was assured that there is no person who supported the politics of the united states, who supported such and such

the position of the messenger, moreover, they emphasize that we absolutely understand that first of all you have to win and we will help you in this, but even if you want to sit down at the negotiating table with putin, this is your right, your decision and no one has the right to pressure you or indicate something, how to agree on what conditions, and so on. well, by the way, regarding the conditions, i want to look at one such comment. well, in principle, this is not a marginal person - this is a person who is the deputy chairman of the state duma committee on defense issues let's see if we have started a special operation in order to grab parts of the rhetoric there or from ukraine, but it is not necessary, how did these territories go? and we are still o

well all of you are satisfied with these not not our territories if you say we will not claim separately we are like that oh everything is great no no no let’s come up with a little bit well yes yes let’s have some minsk-2 over there just sochi- no let her stay let her stay we pump it up again with weapons, this is ukraine and again we will make it there tell you in five years there are interesting processes we are not as stupid as they can imagine we have completely different goals and when they will be fulfilled, so let's say today, de-nezification demo is the militarization of ukraine well, you can be considered as you like, you can treat us as you like, but we explain, return it for a frozen product, otherwise there will be a military-technical response to europe, yes, and he will start to think, well, mom, that's how it was with them too yes, they will not go there, yes, they will

be considered with us in this question, this is our sovereignty, and if you look, for example, at internal russian polls, the levada center was currently conducting them, and there is actually such an interesting opinion. that is, on the question whether should russia make concessions to the west in order to lift sanctions, well , in almost all age groups, with the exception of the youngest, about 80% answered that it shouldn’t. and this is where the question arises. and in this case, what can we even agree on now with putin how is this possible, well, that is, what should be, roughly speaking, the goals of these negotiations in general? tell me, please, the goals. let’s say the hidden goals or the real goals of russia that it is trying to

achieve . very strongly influence the economy of the russian federation. what is it called ? a big transformation awaits them. big hooks await them , in fact, because today's already broken logistics chains, today they can no longer to purchase high-tech goods, they all still sell oil and gas, but this is accepted . if i'm not mistaken, that's why it's today or yesterday according to the oil company and this will screw them up and on and on and on and on the economy will feel, to put it mildly , not very good, this is the main reason why they are trying to sit down at the negotiating table, but sit down at the negotiating table. as they say, they want to save putin's face, that is, with some territories, so that we make concessions on

some territories and said, well, let's go there, i don't know crimea, we'll forget that there is some there, or you will go to the administrative border of donetsk and luhansk, but this is nonsense because if in russia 80% do not support any concessions to the west, then we have 90 % do not support any concessions from russia, especially in the issue of territorial integrity, that is why we have nowhere to look for a compromise, there is nothing on which we can build these negotiations today , er, there is nowhere to find a middle ground so that we can come to an agreement, because these two sides are they are completely opposite in their essence. well, it’s just that foreign weapons are coming to ukraine, and

the more they come, the less opportunity there is for russia to hope for any victories at the front. it is very important for them now, until they run out of er, this offensive ardor, to have time to do something to fix it there, in principle, russian propaganda in the west, especially in the usa, has made so much effort to promote meetings so that military aid in ukraine is spent ineffectively, as if something is being stolen there, there is no record of such things. i know, they worked with this, and whether they were actually able to repulse the attack of this russian propaganda, russian propaganda is pushing to split the west in order to reveal europe and, after studying the names of the united states with partners in e-e, repeat a new one from the very beginning of this war, and it and such a generative problem will advance in the fact that, unfortunately, this is how they were born, they are also picked up by our

societies and even in the western media, in particular cnn , which you are talking about, there was indeed a story about ukraine allegedly using ineffective weapons it is alleged that the weapons that are delivered to ukraine can end up on the black market in a third country . well, this is actually some kind of announcement because we are fighting countries that need weapons and we will send them somewhere . especially since these are state channels and not some private ones . it is possible well, i don’t know there without documents is there any other way to put these weapons somewhere? yes, i really lived my own investigation from the beginning or conventionally speaking from the pentagon to the front line, that is, i first tried to find where exactly the uh-uh leak of this source of information that we really have problems, i mean on the part of the united states, who is the official person who

will confirm this problem to me . with other officials and officials of the united states. i did not find a single person who officially told me that yes, we have questions for the ukrainian side regarding a-a supply by us or weapons or humanitarian aid such as bulletproof vests and helmets there are first aid kits and so on. at first i said ok , let's go, maybe they don't want to say it officially, maybe there really are problems there, but not through official channels, and i drove from the warehouses, relatively speaking, from the border with poland, how do they come to us there to e- e front line i saw and actually with my own eyes and first-aid kits and well, of course, weapons and i

communicated with our military and i communicated with i er received requests answers to requests excellent defense of ours how they were distributed some well in short there is no problem there is no problem and moreover, the united states publicly acknowledges it there, and including in our local marathon , representatives of the usa were included, who spoke about the fact that we believe that ukraine effectively uses all the help it provides. that is, it is actually an information attack . it's a pity that i received such support in our society. well, today this issue came up, but this is how you will be every time. it happens every day. almost they are trying to destabilize something. due to information equality, it is missile weapons, and

they are very categorical about this, let's see which ones can go 300 km, football , and ukraine will not use it in the donbass. and this speed for strikes on our territory is 300 km, almost this is practically decological, and i think that here we will have a painful full moral right to completely demolish the entire center to make a decision in kyiv and something to make a decision, this is not only a bank street, this is the us embassy, ​​which is accepted by the decision of the british embassy in germany, they must be instantaneous. we have a collector destroyed for this purpose. if this supply goes away, then the entire transport system,

uh , is also an option. there is another option. air defense systems are the second and i control them. well, we have many countries in latin america and, er, in asia, where we can also put them, here we have another literally a minute to do it, please tell me already now i see a big plus, no one says. at least of these, more of these are considered more official experts regarding radioactive ash. but do all these statements of russia affect the provision of missile weapons to us? forecasts, let's say , about which this russian character voiced er, er, is on the air now. i mean that these missiles can be used on the territory of the russian federation, they are actually being discussed in the united states on them and the united states has

these are fears, but we, from our side , are dispelling these fears because we say that all the weapons that are supplied to ukraine and they can not be divided into assault and offensive weapons are all for us defense weapons and we need them first . after all, we need to unblock our territories , which are several in some places, 100 km 150 km away, and we need to mine the enemy's rear with those long-range missiles that can be delivered by the russian federation, or by russia from our side in the russian federation in mind, but from the united states to us. and this is the main thing, in fact, and this is exactly what we are talking about

now. of the united states because today they already understand what they are for us and how we will use them, i hope that in the near future we will receive well, we also very much hope for that, especially since there was a statement by at least biden that they will maybe a little shorter range, but they will be. so we will wait, because it should help us very much. thank you, yehor junev, the head of the delegation of the verkhovna rada at the nato parliamentary assembly. thank you to the audience. see you all today . join us pavlo kovtunyuk, co-founder of the ukrainian center for health care and ex-deputy head of the ministry of health, congratulations mr. pavlenko

, we are talking about important things with you may 22-28 the world health assembly of the world health organization, at which the theme of the war in ukraine was discussed, please share the results and results of this assembly, please. we, as a country, and i, as a citizen, as an expert, had high expectations for this assembly, why and because the who - this is not just a humanitarian organization, it is an international political organization that is an association of 184 member countries that cares for the health of the whole world, and accordingly we have an unprecedented situation when russia, one of the members, invaded ukraine you had the second member and has been systematically destroying our medicine for several months, this is unprecedented in history, this is a case, and we expected that there would be

an appropriate reaction, there would be appropriate sanctions , unfortunately, there were none, the elk just made a statement about that, well , this is a concern, a condemnation, in fact, he gave that to russia - and karbansh, what can we do further? and we did not notice that more than two hundred hospitals in ukraine were destroyed. you can continue under our deep condemnation. in short, these were the results. the world health organization can impose such and such. we expected two sanctions that would be quite painful for the russian federation . the second - also no less important - is that the minister of health of russia is a member of the who executive committee as well as the minister of health of belarus, that is, these two people

make decisions, they have a very serious influence on the policy of this organization for one year and three years forward and we expected that both one and the second sanction would be applied because i can't imagine in the world it could be that a member of the government of ukraine who destroys medicine in another country and sitting, for example , on wednesday at the same table, will become the minister of defense on friday sits at the who and talks about how we will build a health care system. unfortunately , not one, not the other, but the west. that sanction, so and so, did not manage to apply it against russia. why is there such a weakness in the organization, such a lack of unity is related with the fact that it is easy to enter there a huge number of members of the world and there are consensus decisions, and the decision required the exclusion of e-e from the deprivation of the right to vote.

it required two-thirds of the votes for the removal of the russian minister, it required half somewhere. that is, it is not a consensus, it is not something very difficult, but from the very beginning the large-scale war showed that the situation was a bit disorientated and for a long time could not make up its mind about it. they reacted very weakly. in fact, he at least immediately managed to issue a resolution with some clear messages, then he was away. they simply did not notice the situation for a month. she did not say the word war in her official statements . such an independent war, they didn't say who was to blame for the destruction of our hospitals, and only at the end of april they started to make more or less clear statements, but as we can see

, these were just statements and some political will to act to show russia that this is absolutely unacceptable and we will respond immediately to this, this never happened, and accordingly, how it looks for russia, for russia, it is very profitable. and it has been attacking our hospitals for three months, the truck is going to say and i emphasize now the resolution so that if russia continues our actions about the assembly, we will consider the possibility of applying to the russian federation the relevant articles of its charter, what does this mean to the ears of russia, we did not notice what you did, you can continue, well, at some point, we may consider such a possibility again time to sit down and think what to do, in fact, russia gave the green light, mr. fuel, because hospitals are

clear targets, priority targets of uh, russian attacks and missile and bomb attacks, does this also mean that in fact doctors are uh, in fact, if on the front lines of this war, i ask this in including in the context of some kind of compensation payments for the people who are suffering, it is obvious that they are dying, it is obvious that they have injuries for their families, what about these situations, because the minister of defense varshikov last week said that about 65 billion is in fact, the state owes such a debt to people who directly participate in hostilities as of next month, and hospitals are de facto also one of the fronts of the struggle, because unlike other organizations, institutions, and hospitals can

not be closed during hostilities actions and when enemy troops are approaching some territory and active hostilities begin, then the school , and i don’t know the store, the ministry may not work, but the hospital must work like this. that is, they take an active part in me what is happening especially, for example, ambulances. there, uh, we recorded 33 cases in our organization, and so on doctors who work in an ambulance, these are people who simply drive under shells and take people out, so you are right and ask - anya about compensation, it is very interesting because on my opinion, and again, eh. during this assembly, this question should have arisen because why should ukraine pay this compensation ? was calling on all member countries to increase

the funding of humanitarian aid to ukraine in parentheses russia can destroy and kill and would you please throw down money to compensate for this dear member countries, so once again returning to our first initial topic, my assessment is that the international infrastructure of peace was created after the second world war in in this case, in the person of the world health organization, it did not work at all in the case of our free one from russia, but i already have a candidate for the next head of the educational organization of health care - this is, for example, ulyana suprun i think she would have coped well and could have reformed this structure, this is on the verge of a joke, of course, but thank you very much for this conversation pavlo kovtonyuk, co-founder of the ukrainian health care center, about the situation with doctors, broken hospitals, which remind me of the russian army, actually consider