maybe he just became a victim of incompetence in this case. but that's another matter, let the sbu decide now and then maybe if it's open, then god willing, we'll find out everything. state administration i can say for sure that this deputy is not the main one in this group because they are the ones who drained kherson oblast. and it is not for nothing that the front line passed along the administrative border of kherson oblast for a long time. the heads of kryvyi rih, the kryvyi rih administration , vilkul and the mykolaivskyi administration, kim, together with mayor sidkevich, uh, they don’t even have formal grounds to take care of kherson region, or to form territorial defense here, to finance kherson villages, they are freed, and that is why the

local, let’s say, mykolaiv or kryvyi rih territorial defense is not he very willingly enters foreign territory, er, not here, humanitarian goods are willingly brought there, this is actually the activity itself, you can only thank the people of mykolaiv and hmm, the people of kryvyi rih who are helping with this need to understand that there are no separate items in the budget for financing these districts, because there is a kherson regional budget, which the administration does not actually implement, in which there are balances of funds, and which should be financed, for example, certain institutions that are partially regional ones have stopped being financed, for example, there is a regional theater or other regional communal enterprises, like us, yes, it is partially used

, no. in particular, in the kherson region, for informing us volodymyr movchanov, a political scientist in kherson was in touch with us. and now we are with taras dumenko , the head of the gostomel village military administration. taras, we congratulate you. glory to ukraine , glory to the heroes. good day. of the urban type, which was very seriously affected from the first hours of the russian intervention in ukraine, we know the tragic fate of the head of the guest house, and at the same time, it is very important to track how an urban-type village which, by the way, may soon become a city, such an initiative is also allegedly appearing as it recovers and recovers after the occupation of mr. taras, what about the city , how many

victims can now be counted, in particular, from the occupation, how many people were left without roof and what are we doing now together, i hope in order to eliminate all these losses a-a thank you for the question, indeed, our village was left without a community meter and we are the first military administration of a populated area in ukraine paragraph that was created by the decree of the president in accordance with the law of ukraine on the legal regime of martial law will still be a temporary body of state power, and we are working to restore the life of our village and hope that, as you correctly said, there is already a submission to the cabinet of ministers to the verkhovna rada, we are waiting for a positive decision of the parliamentarians regarding the transfer of the status of the city to us, this issue is long overdue and it is a pity that it is being resolved. unfortunately, only based on the results of armed

aggression if we are talking about the losses suffered our village, it is worth understanding that our community includes four settlements, this is the village of gostomel, and the villages of movchun and gorenka lakes, and from them the situation is different, because if we are talking about the village of the lake, then only 31 houses were destroyed there, if damaged, although they are from the first days were under occupation, the need for people there was primarily a humanitarian one hmmm, this is food, medicines, and so on, if we are talking about the village of gostomel, then there was a creeping occupation here, quite a lot of victims among the civilian population, and only 107 bodies were definitely on the territory of our community , and about 30 people are now officially wanted. officially, this means that their close relatives reached the police department, wrote a statement accordingly, and a procedural process will be drawn up. about

150 residents were forcibly deported to belarus, so far about 3 200 residents addressed one with statements about partially or completely destroyed housing, if we are talking about the village of gorynka, then it was never occupied, but it was constantly under fire from the russians, and there were also devastating destruction ah and probably the last thing i will remember is that it almost started from the face of the earth today as a result of shelling by orcs and eh well there is a difficult situation because it is the private sector, people still hold on to their land and try to continue to serve in their own way life is actually destroyed in the houses, we spoke recently with buchanan leaders, in particular, and we have to

state that a certain bureaucracy of the procedures, in particular, still does not allow people to receive compensation so that they can already somehow ah, to fix your home like this because summer is wonderful, but we understand that, uh, all those torn , destroyed roofs of houses were in good hands, we are going to cover them right here and now, well, for now, people are advised, so to speak, on their own to a greater extent that in gostomel, the situation with this is similar to the situation in general in our district in the kyiv region, there are really a lot of bureaucratized procedures. i wouldn’t say that they are too bureaucratized to help people, they are bureaucratized in order to overcome those possible negative consequences, what a-a yes, let's look at the issue of the property survey

today, according to current procedures, a residential premises can be recognized as emergency only on the basis of the technical description of the engineer, or destroyed. well, is it partially destroyed and restored? if there is an appropriate restoration project, reconstruction or capital repair, it is really this bureaucratic mechanism that blocks the work on restoration well, more precisely, it makes it longer, yes but he us saves later from possible problems. and with regard to the emergency of his home, which will be in two years. well, there they examined me, for example, without specialists, they quickly examined the roof properly, which in a year may fall on some child, and of course , some kind of relaxation is needed, but for now, we are together with the experts did not find a constructive solution to this, the fact that, again, everyone is trying to work as

quickly as possible, and experts and project organizations, and not everyone understands that we are in a state of war, the bureaucratic procedures were largely written also with blood and although there was blood in peacetime, i wanted to clarify about the approximate horizon of receiving some kind of systemic assistance, if people were able to receive at least some part of the funds, because we understand, well , at least the roofs of destroyed houses should be covered with film, because it very often happens that the house is left without a roof the rainy season begins there, i don't know some kind of rain and the whole house then suffers from it. although i don't know any palliative palliative funds or when they would arrive. people receive help with building materials, which we distribute today through our humanitarian headquarters thanks to those international donors

and organizations that provide them to us, that is, in fact, in our community today, you can contact the humanitarian headquarters to give the need and get the same tarpaulin for to cover the roof, the same film to cover the windows, the same sheets of slate to restore a partially destroyed one, so volunteers also help with the analysis of debris or the elimination of these consequences if they are not insignificant separately, i want to say that there is a regional program for the elimination of consequences in terms of current repairs, and now all of us communities are preparing certain acts and estimates to support those residents whose consequences for armed aggression can be eliminated with current repairs. therefore, this is already the as for more er let's say so er significant destruction here, of

course, it takes time and the search for an appropriate budget ah, unfortunately, we all forget that it is not the local government, nor the regional government, nor even the state government that caused these losses to people and did it the aggressor state in the course of hostilities and the procedure for their recovery goes directly to the international tribunal and is called reparations, and here we will be very grateful to the parliamentarians, all together and local authorities and residents a-a if it is speeded up a-a adoption in the second reading of the law 71-98, according to which the state of ukraine can undertake to help its residents at the expense of the state budget, e.e., without forcing them to expect exactly those reparations, thank you, thank you, mr. taras taras dumenko, head of the gostomel settlement of the military administration worked on the live air of our marathon, i would like to wish you strength in the implementation of the many problems that we

just imagine what they are. well, we remind you that today the verkhovna rada of ukraine dismissed from her position the verkhovna rada commissioner for human rights lyudmila denisova for it was voted by the required number of people's elected representatives, contact us tetyana pechunchyk, head of the board of the human rights center, ms. tetyana, we congratulate you, glory to ukraine, as we understand lyudmila denisova no more human rights ombudsman. in particular, i don't quite understand who is being proposed for this position instead, but i am personally very concerned about the situation when the country is in the hot phase of the war and there is no one who should take care of the violation of human rights at this moment. i am really asking lyudmila denisova in our uh, as human rights defenders, uh, there were a lot of comments , starting with the politicized procedure of her election

uh, four years ago, and it's obvious that she didn't quite fit the position she held, but the way in which she was removed now and with what use procedure is even more disgusting, because it is actually the destruction of the institution of independence of the verkhovna rada commissioner for human rights, and that is exactly how it was done because of a vote of no confidence, which was not previously provided for in the law, that is, the deputies made changes before this at the beginning of may, and on may 20 they acquired entered into force in the law on the legal regime of martial law, where they provided for the possibility of removing those officials who were appointed by the parliament to bypass all procedures due to the expression of no confidence and thus today was removed lyudmila denisova and unfortunately, this process is actually very opaque, what will happen next , why did they decide to remove lyudmila denisova from her post, and from what was announced publicly, this is

actually a certain criticism of the data that she publicly announced, in particular, regarding war crimes that were not always confirmed, they were not properly verified, but also, as i understood from the position of the people's deputies, they did not see her very active work, also on the release of ukrainian prisoners, actually those who are on the territory of the aggressor country on the territory of belarus , that is, they would like her to do more such work on the inclusion of the liberation of our people. well, information was just coming in, so that there were accusations against ms. denisova that she spread too much information about, for example, the crimes of russian interventionists against our of the civilian population, in particular, it is about crimes of a

sexual nature, including against minors . to what extent is this information that she is voicing actually verified, or can it be confirmed in some way? is it just from some hotlines where there is no verification of such information? how about you ? deported to the russian federation, she spoke about 1.3 million e-e, we doubt that this figure is such and that it is at all data that the russian federation itself voices, that is, it is obvious that these data are different and in general, it is difficult to say how many people were forcibly deported to the russian federation. it

seems to me that this is precisely what manifested itself. well, there is a certain problem with the dissemination of a verified situation to which there would be no objections to which there would be trust, but on the other hand, eh, as i already said that it was absolutely unacceptable to shoot lyudmyluy nisova in such a way. how was it done and taking into account the fact that she did not remain in her position for a long time, that is, she was appointed for a five-year term, which expires in march of next year, why is there such a rush to dismiss her, why was she in such a hurry, and it is difficult to say why, it is possible that on the one hand, there was a certain dissatisfaction with her work and the quality of her work, but on the other hand, i think that it is also the fact that the current government wants to have another ombudsman who is more

controlled, more tame, just like lyudmila denisova. also, she is, uh, not a human rights defender , she was from political circles and she was close to the previous government, uh, there are also attempts. i think there will be attempts by the current one some candidacies are already being announced, many candidacies are being announced in the public space, first the names of three people's deputies from the servant of the people appeared: oleksandr kachura, and maryana bezugla and mykola tyshchenko. of course, none of them have human rights experience and should not have would be elected to this position, but the name of elena verbytska, who is the president's representative for the protection of the rights of military personnel, was also heard, although we also do not have any very reliable

data to say that she is really a professional the human rights defender has other names, but we, as defenders, are extremely confused by the quality of the previous ombudsman. this procedure takes place in an extremely opaque backroom manner without eh, and we insist that before the human rights community, there were human rights organizations or not. consultations for the process of selecting a butzman, what interrupts me, i imagine the same mr. tyshchenko or the same ms. bezuglu, yes, people who know documents in ukrainian are not the same thing, see ms. pechanchyk in this position. one more history, here you noticed the actual military prisoners and the guardianship of this er-e tsarina used to be like this , and we got used to the fact that the minister of coffee is the

prime minister on issues. here, in particular, iryna vereshchuk was involved in this work, and just a few days ago she announced that she was transferring yes, everything related to the issue of prisoners of war, in particular, is in the hands of mr. budanov, as we understand it now, because it is under his leadership that some kind of cabinet will be created. there is such and such a body that will deal with the issue of prisoners of war, the head of the main directorate of intelligence, prisoners of war and how would you, as a human rights defender, interpret these changes ? it is difficult to comment on this, but of course one must understand that the russian occupiers capture not only prisoners of war, but they also capture civilian hostages, in particular, our organization documents cases of forced disappearances of active citizens in the territories newly occupied by the russian federation these are activists, journalists, volunteers , representatives of local self-government bodies, and we

have already documented 201 such cases of enforced disappearances and we are very much rooting for these people to be released as well. and i have a fear that if it is given, it is already given into the hands of the gur, maybe it will be more about prisoners of war, but i still want the state to fight for the release of every person who actually was held hostage in the russian federation, taking into account our civilian hostages as well. ms. denisova, who spoke too much publicly about russian crimes, of course, it is possible not always to have confirmed information, but i would like to summarize this topic with reflections on social networks . mykhailo zhornakov, the ideyure foundation, notes

the details of her observations. there are more signs that against the background of very modest successes at the front, the enemy has changed tactics and is directing efforts as much as possible . on the destruction of constitutional institutions and destabilization of the situation from the inside, for example, an attack on the institute of the boatswain , a statement about the curtailment of the judicial reform, the destruction of the ksu incomprehensible issues surrounding the sbu intelligence and counter-intelligence and proposals to legislate the killing of servicemen and so on are still dragging the russian propagandist ovsyannikova to kyiv and who jumped around with posters. if we really want to win this war, we will have to convince the authorities to get rid of enemy agents in the highest offices, otherwise this is all maybe zakin, this is very unpleasant, so we add to our information and analytical marathon anton mikhnenko, a military expert, defense express. glory to ukraine, anton, in the second word, i congratulate you half an hour ago, we analyzed the situation in the south of our country in such a detailed manner that our armed forces liberated several settlements

, albeit not the largest. but the main thing is that there is a certain dynamic. how do you see this process of liberating our territories in the south of the country? traffic is all in the south and we are trying to liberate our territories , this is good for several reasons, because firstly, we do not allow our enemy to gain a foothold in those regions, secondly, we give hope to our citizens of ukraine who come to that territory under occupation, are forced to be under the pressure of the russian authorities, which are established in that region, and thirdly, we have the opportunity. thus, if our troops continue to move as successfully as possible, to cut off the possibility of the supply of weapons and the supply routes of armed military equipment from the crimean side that is, in principle, there is definitely a positive here and god forbid that it even moves like that well, it is simply saying was it a situational fluctuation or do we still feel a certain powerful plan in its implementation see i

i am convinced that there is a certain powerful plan, but uh, this plan would have been implemented much faster. if there was a supply of weapons from our partners much earlier and in much larger volumes, the further we move in time, the later the supply of weapons of salvo missile systems will be. fire of different calibers and for different ranges of artillery weapons and accumulation of ammunition, the further in time we give the opportunity to our enemy to gain a foothold in this region, and the more difficult it will be for us to act, and therefore on today we see the picture that we are not yet fully saturated with the weapons that we would like, i mean superior in terms of 6 artillery weapons of the nato-made salvo missile system of american production, which can operate much further, a little further than what we have, and we are forced to move a little earlier than we have a certain armament saturated in our

troops if there were more observers of these rubas on a much larger front and more intensively i think so i think so i want for myself to understand, mr. anton, the question of this range in general, around which the discussions are supposedly even within the american political community, at least when it came to the mlrs for us. and the military aid of the west, in particular from the united states, will still look like eh, so that they will give us these emls but such a range that will not allow striking deep into russia , michael mcfaul reported this, i’ll remind you, it’s simple. on our border with them, where it is available to us, it is now in the sumy region, for example. well, just a fighter who can simply throw a grenade on the territory of russia already falls into the territory of russia,

such discussions are a little bit strange to me, in fact, these are some strange discussions, because we have our own weapons , a salvo missile system, the same, play the same hurricanes that can shoot in the direction of the russian federation. if desired, therefore, the question here is most likely a simple one, that the salvo missile system that is in the united states, which we are offered these mars and m-270, they have a wide enough arsenal of ammunition that can be used there. that is, there are unguided ammunition of 227 mm caliber and guided ammunition . these guided munitions caliber 227 mm are m-31 or m30 that can hit at a distance of up to 80 km. that is, we have such a large arm with sufficient movement, at the same time, we could, in addition, under the same complexes under these

the missile launchers themselves are to be obtained and the missiles are the so-called attack missiles that have a range of up to 300 km. that is, we can look deep enough into the enemy's corner and destroy control points and some bases for storing weapons and military equipment or the accumulation of military equipment in one or another region, that is, i think so, it is about the fact that the united states does not go to us, but it will not give us these missiles , as well as those that could hit at a distance of up to 300 km, but at the same time, it should be noted that we will have harpoons that will give us the data, and in principle , being on the shores of the black sea in the northwestern part, we can strike at a distance of 28,300 km, including the coast of crimea, if we really want to, that is, here, in principle, political statements may not be so clear.

but it is possible even so simply they know, as it were , the capabilities of certain weapons. that's all. well, on the other hand, we understand that the issue is not only in quality, but also in quantity. at the moment, in luhansk region and donetsk region, we see that the enemy is simply covering us, literally a couple of hours ago in on our broadcast, the commander of the svobody battalion noted that on average it is one to 20 shots from jet systems in the hall of fire, and on hotter days - it is one to 50, that is, the ratio of artillery, the russians engage everything that can shoot , that is, they destroy the territory almost per square meter our tactics of filled earth yes yes yes yes russia traditionally acts in that way this is how it knows how to fight we just burn it all into the ground where it goes the tactics are simple they go they will try to

deliver artillery strikes destroy objects then they launch infantry there, if the infantry meets resistance, it retreats again, rocket artillery strikes are applied and the infantry are again bombarded in this way, that is, they advance in another way, they simply do not know how to fight. that is, this is just a classic approach that exists in the russian federation of the russian federation, and this approach actually completely destroys it that is, we will have the region and the north of luhansk region completely destroyed, that is, these uh, infrastructure objects, these enterprises, these residential complexes that existed, they will be destroyed by the russian by the federation and what they are, what they didn’t happen to us, well, countermeasures tools, well, that is, it turns out that when we have enough of the same artillery that we are talking about now, then in order to stop and restrain russia, we will have to act exactly the same, just go we will already be all over

destroyed, in fact, i understand that the most important thing here is a counter-battery fight. that is, these are artillery duels, we have to calculate what means of destruction they have in this or that place in a timely manner, er, level the possibility of their launches, calculate areas where they can concentrate to strike our territory, use our weapons that will hit further than they are and the weapons are the same if they use hailstones, we should hit them with a greater distance and greater weapons with hurricanes . if they use their same tornadoes, then we have to use those samples that the united states will not supply. that is, we have to make them , we have to beat them to prejudice and from that distance to which they will not be able to reach us, in addition, there are directly necessary means of radar means of sound-metric reconnaissance that allow us to identify possible areas of launching these missiles and launching

artillery fire damage is carried out by artillery and missile launches and we can timely detect and timely destroy it again this is a complex struggle, it is not simple. the struggle is not difficult , it is not easy, but it is a complex struggle and it can be won at the expense of intelligence at the expense of timely implementation finally, mr. antona wanted would like to clarify what are the real prospects for the involvement, so to speak, of our western partners - western partners and neighbors, yes, for the organization of convoys, in particular with grain, it is about unblocking the ports of the black sea basin, this is a difficult question. somehow act in this way so that the russian federation compromises who can be part of those convoys, of course, the countries of the

black sea region, this is first of all, if we take the countries of the black sea region, then in the vast majority may be romania or bulgaria, russia will not go for it because these are nato countries and they know very well the relations that currently exist between these countries turkey may be a participant in this convoy great britain the united states of the russian federation did not perceive as a country that will be provided great britain, in principle, is also not inclined to this, so we have such a situation that here the convoy can be from the ships of those countries that are neutral, well, relatively neutral, or which the russian federation can accept. that is, the creation of the convoy itself is problematic enough under the current conditions. the second point is the position of russia, she said yes .