this is an enterprise, even you can sign a certain document when the leadership of your faction tells you that you must act in this way, but this definitely does not ensure 100% your presence at the next meeting and voting for the same specific initiative, even the author of which you appear to be, that is the situation that it is possible that in the future we are expected to make certain decisions that must go to the verkhovna rada of ukraine on possible external political issues and internal political issues, they may be various. we do not know and that is why it is probably very important for someone to be able to sit on a remote server and manage voting, or at least you know , you can send text messages to all the deputies you want to send out of five, let's vote yes, well, there used to be a late chetov who gave the go-ahead to the verkhovna rada, now you can do that here well, it's a big field for manipulation, and we understand that no one can control it. i understand that we have free time to talk. thank you very much. victoria for yours for your comment.

people's deputy of ukraine of the eighth convocation commented on this initiative on remote voting, fortunately, this initiative has not been implemented yet. thank you, i wish you a good evening, mrs. victoria and we continue now, i understand. ready my colleague lina chichenina to talk about culture in wartime. now we will see comrade is stuffed so it's ready, good evening please give me a word, i'm always ready vasyl , and congratulations to you, congratulations to our viewers another boycott of russian culture eh friends, another act of ukrainian artists and actually five writers didn't go to the festival, the norwegian festival of literature in lile hamari, because russian

writers were present, well, among these writers who refused to participate in festivals in norway - this is sofia andruhovich serhii zhadan yevgenia kuznetsova and then they refused kateryna babkina and love yakymchuk eh well of course i wouldn’t, well i don’t speak norwegian well but it seems that not so much press wrote about it at all and who wrote that eh they wrote that this is a boycott of our festival by ukrainian writers, well, we want to talk to the writer in more detail about this. with love, yakymchuk. if she doesn't answer us yet, she seems to be on the way while she picks up the phone. i 'll tell you what is so global it is a problem and a global issue precisely for our artists to participate in various international festivals in them, in general, in various events if russians are present there

, because at the beginning of the full-scale invasion, when we were just gathering, the first solution was of course not to take part in such events because why should we be together with the russians on the same platform why are they invited at all because our message from the message in particular was that it is not possible to invite russian artists to various world-renowned events because this well, let's say it harms, it must harm at least the image of this or that important event, it turned out that there are many different events from film festivals to music festivals, the radius of oneself to see russian artists, they call them oppositional, but they call them oppositional, but they, let's say so happy, you see, because they consider them fighters against the regime, so what uh, what kind of respect for everything else, and the lords are very surprised why, ah,

ukrainian writers, musicians, directors, for some reason , everyone does not like it, for some reason, they say something opposite. well, after several refusals, of course, in throw shovels, for example, they started talking about the fact that it is possible that this decision needs to be reviewed so that the code is boycotted, but when it turns out that there is something happening there, for example, a literary festival, and there are some discussions about ukraine, but ukraine is not present, but russia is of course leaning in. and their speakers, their various artists are starting to say something for us and about themselves, of course, are starting to promote their different messages, and we saw that it is not very beneficial for us, to put it mildly, ukraine should be a subject a as it has already been repeated more than once by many ukrainians from various completely different industries and therefore, er, hmm, regarding these

boycotts, they have already somehow begun to review the issue of it. we saw it, for example, at the cannes film festival , because the cannes film festival came as russian artists, for example, kirill serebrynnikov, as well as our directorial groups of two films, the vision of metelika and panfir, we are waiting for the rental of these two tapes, of course, and our artists, of course , stated that in the interview, and they were, respectively, in t-shirts here. now we we see love yakymchuk performs at this no grammy uh and she read a certain message there yes and about her husband's war about her parents ah about the fact that a man is at war after all it's different of course it was enough so bright miko newton we see now ukrainian a singer who currently lives in the united states otaki plays the piano john legend by the way, this was a very successful

message that ukrainian artists put forward through such a form, er, a very similar story of our protest and the protest of er, african americans and that of the entire blm blacklife maters movement and it was precisely on this, hmm, on these parallels, they played then in this speech, in particular, the love of yakymchuk, the name of newton, and of course, to many people in america, in principle , our entire situation became clearer, because we must constantly understand that our context is far not everyone understood, and far from all, well, except for our closest countries, which also suffered from the russian empire, from the russian federation, from the soviet union, they had finland, poland, and the baltic countries, and so on and so on, all of us they don't understand that's why it's so important for artists, a child, different events, hmm, and to promote

some of our ideas through this soft power, but that's how we see now, with the case of the norwegian film festival in oli olegamer, as many as five of our e- there are very cool writers they refused to take part there because of the participation of russian writers eh well, we wanted to talk about it with love yakymchuk as far as i understand she won't be there she won't pick up the phone well we will try to talk about it further with the artists i think serhii zhadan sofia andruhovych could you explain your position well enough, because i will repeat myself once again, five very cool speakers, smart people, uh, talented writers, writers, ah, well, they refused to go to this festival and tell something about i wanted them to agree and explain ukraine because our er is not love. let's say this to russian

oppositionists and russian er artists, how they call themselves oppositional liberals is incomprehensible to the majority of the civilized world, and that's why we need to explain it constantly instead. of course, it is the russians who are showing this very vividly. they are constantly promoting their messages, they are getting stronger. that's why we need to take this very seriously. well, we didn't have a conversation with love yakymchuk today. this is a live broadcast. i hope, for example, on my saturday broadcast that we will still talk about them , because the topic is extremely important to me , vasyl, thank you very much for your word. lena told me about the lines about culture during the war. well, she talked about cultural exchange. now, the only exchange is with the russian federation is an exchange on the battlefield, and in this exchange, we must win. well , there, defend your culture and build and develop. and russia, let them do what they want abroad, let

them do it, that's their personal business serhii szorgets with us in the studio. my colleague, the co-host, an expert from defense express. i congratulate you. i will start with this information before we move on to the situation on the fronts of the president of slovakia , suzanchaputova confirmed the transfer of self-propelled artillery systems to ukraine. in the kyiv region, there is a small town that suffered from enemy aggression very significantly, they also met with volodymyr zelenskyi, it was about lobbying for the status of ukraine's candidate for the european union cooperation in the energy sector, assistance to the post-war reconstruction of ukraine, as well as the possibility of joint border and customs control are in solidarity and the wave of this solidarity is not receding, but

on the contrary, the wave of solidarity from ukraine is growing. to support er and i will always convince those states that are skeptical of such membership so that ukraine can get such a status as soon as possible, so zozan brought us suzanne, well , this is a wonderful story, of course, thank you very much slovakia, that it is also helping ukraine in these difficult times with weapons, mr. serhii, now let 's talk about those places where these weapons are used in the fight against the enemy, about the situation on the fronts, please well, actually, really, western aid is extremely important at the current stage of the review in order for this to really strengthen our capabilities in various directions, the situation at the front in general is quite difficult , because the enemy really does not deviate from his goal of achieving at least some minimal progress in

the hostilities on the territory of ukraine, if we consider i will start our general map from the raisin and continue there directly to the russian troops are trying to gain a foothold to the east of the raisin in the area of ​​the estuary. they are trying to make some attempts to advance there, but without success. to cut off our way of life there, but without much success - the ukrainian counteroffensive in the northwestern part of the kherson region forced the russian troops to occupy defensive positions and resort to an attempt to prevent further progress by undermining the city bridge across the river. now we can see exactly with the scheme that directly applies to these main directions in the russian troops, but these are theoretically speaking

directions that are requested extremely slowly considering the fact that we are not surrender without a fight by any method and, first of all, we implement the strategy of exhausting the russian forces in all these directions, the main emphasis is really now concentrated directly on the situation in the battles in severodonetsk refers to several areas in the city itself, this is directly the area of ​​the mir hotel and the so-called 82nd district of severodonetsk. if we have an infographic now, we can see it and when we better prepare for it. by the way, we see the advance in severodonetsk. from several directions, and in fact, when this material was being prepared, it became known that the enemy aircraft directly attacked the nitrogen plant, where

a large canister tank with nitric acid was blown up, this is how it creates complications for our troops because our troops are also present in this area, e.e., severodonetsk , they did it in general, what is it, in fact, because it is really significantly complicated, e.e., the protection of this area, because nitric acid vapors require the presence of gas masks, she says, i think that we directly have such means of protection, but we understand that there is also a civilian population that should not suffer from such consequences, but we understand that the enemy does not observe any restrictions, precisely the use of not only nitric acid there, but other means of influence because in addition to this, the enemy has pulled up to severodonetsk several installations, e.e. , one solar flare - these are actually means that use thermobaric ammunition and which have extremely powerful

impressions . began to protect er to clean er separate areas around severodonetsk, this directly concerns two cities, borivskoe and orphanage, but it is precisely from around severodonetsk to get to the siverskyi river in this way, to ensure the encirclement of our garrison right up to this area, are there actually risks of encircling north donetsk, in fact, such risks theoretically exist, as well as the possibility of withdrawing the withdrawal of our troops from north donetsk, if this becomes necessary, it is also possible to continue three and the defense for by the way, the bakhmut-lysichanskyi highway, which provides the main source of supply for logistics facilities and military units, is now under attack

a few days ago, we demonstrated that at the expense of the reserves, we repelled the russian troops who tried to take this route under control, so in any case, we have the possibility of using the reserves to expand the area that we can control. the question is in what format will our the general staff has such opportunities to strengthen reserves and protect our soldiers in this zone. by the way, i read today that russia has already spent half of the medical budget on the e-e missiles that arrived in ukraine of the russian federation well, it actually tracks under uh, experts say that most of these missiles did not hit the target - this is the worst use of missiles by any country since the second world war, but we will now talk about uh, well, i just started talk about what russia is losing , losing, spending, but we are also talking about what it is losing in the war with us, but ukraine destroyed 1,350 russian tanks, i am not talking about bmp btr mt-lb and so on

, observers note that this is more than all the armored forces of france ferenc of britain italy and finland are together, but of course we should accept how much is left of the russian federation, but on this topic we can talk with our expert oleg katkov, an expert from defense express, whom we will include in the conversation, oleg, good evening, thank you for the invitation, serhiy please, i welcome you to our broadcast. in general, how many tanks do the russians have left now, because i know you did such an interesting study where you analyzed the reserves and supply stations of the russian army, because everyone remembers why about the fact that the russians still have as many as 10,000 tanks behind the urals, which is true, which is not true, well, the truth is always true in russia. there is a very good source of information about the huge reserves of their armored

vehicles . at the beginning of the conflict, we destroyed 1,358, that is, what they still have on the move, from kaliningrad to vladivostok, it is already less than two thousand of them, it is necessary to understand that a tank is rain, it is a will, such a huge thing, and in order to even transfer it, you need to have huge reserves of fuel and the other, that is, the deployed and already lost forces - these are simply catastrophic losses that are actually measured in half of the nato countries - there are no such tanks in total . an idea of ​​the huge reserves there of 10 spaniards across the urals and on er, on such a talisman, a monk would of course like to have such

data, but it is forgotten that it is very huge. imagine that there is a car that has been on the network for 20 years, and the sound has disappeared. and by the way we we see on the screen the destruction of the newest russian tank t-90 e-e mms called breakthrough, which was used for the first time in ukraine in the format of a combat unit, we see that it is standing on the road and it would explode from the impact of a swedish rpg this is the first time when this latest tank is destroyed and we see that the latest dynamic protection systems did not really help this tank to survive in ukraine. i think that all the countries that wanted to use it tested their anti-aircraft weapons in ukraine and saw it in action and sweden and germany, i don't know who else was there. well,

the united states of america, britain, i don't know who else gave us anti-tank systems, but who wanted tanks for everyone? imagine that you have a car there that is parked in the garage and already there 20 years and it didn’t even start. that is, you are always more than this vehicle, a huge question . and even if you really see on satellite images the conditions in which the tanks are stored, it is generally in the open air, and from our own experience in ukraine, it is enough. well, this is known what lifting tanks from storage is a huge complex when you just need to move the tank in general. well, remove the cog, remove the engine wiring from it , well, actually, from the tank that was in storage there for at least 10-20 years, only the body remains, and even there there have already been cases when the russian federation took

an obsolete t-62 from you for storage and then the commander of the military unit of this storage base shot himself or was released. that is, two such cases have already been documented there, that is, in fact, if we are talking about combat capability of the tank troops of the russian army, they have less than two -thirds of liters of initial reserves left for the entire country, and this is a huge loss for the russian federation, in fact, because they cannot compensate for them and all those efforts to remove the t-62 storage from you some of them caught khrushchev, it’s such an agony, because raising such a low technological tank is many times easier and faster than raising, for example, the 72 or t-80, which

they also have in sufficient quantity, after all, we have a storage base, i think it is possible also russia, by the way, planes. maybe we shot down less than, well, in relation to how many of them there are in russia, than destroyed tanks, and that's only because lately they simply don't fly into the affected area with planes, they're afraid, but i think that's how we would reach what would also be raised by those mussels on which gagarin still flew. that means those who fought in this six-day war, let's say there and or those who still fought there in north korea when there was a korean war, that is, a lot of things can be unfrozen in them, and here the question is, do you know which a or there is someone to hope for putin now, and in light of the fact that he is running out of equipment, because there must be some reserve, because russia can be attacked from any side, that is, the country must have at least some electoral capacity , so in this situation, does not the role of the same lukashenko increase ? i think that he also has a lot of defense equipment there in belarus, and it is possible that putin will use it if it is possible

, again please, again, this is a very likely option, because there is information about the removal of tanks and armor in belarus to infantry fighting vehicles, but i think there will be a lind-lease in belarusian, when the equipment that was modernized at russian factories will go to the russian army, and the belarusians will consider what they can raise from their warehouses. this is simply a much faster option, because again, for raising storage congress is a task for several months and the second stage in order to, well, for understanding, and even if you take the old t-72 there, not to mention even with older tanks there, in the modern battlefield it will be blind and deaf and silent is just a piece of metal because it does not have modern communication. and those radio stations that exist, they

simply jam, well, like two fingers, there are no thermal imaging sights. and those that are, they no longer meet the modern requirements of combat, and the combat effectiveness of such a unit is realistically 3-4 times less than , for example, at our point there are four samples of the 17th year, which is in no way inferior to the 372 b3 or the t-70 e-e 80 bmw or the t-90s of the latest versions, but these are the outdated tanks that can lift it, well, it’s just scrap metal which is far from a fact that it will happen at all to go somewhere and shoot so accurately and finally there is one more fact, one benefit of such a transfer can be from the side of belarus, because this is actually the only source of armored vehicles that they have left in order to quickly take its speed and even more so - this is

a rather short cry of logistics that is, it is one thing to pull tanks from far away there, it will bring down the east, and it is another matter to just take somewhere half of minsk, by the way, i think that it is possible that we will soon see a kv -1 tank on the fields of ukraine. it was such a tank. long did not take root on the fronts. but maybe somewhere he was also lying in them in museums and you can take all the t-34s from the pedestals, too. so, there is such a possibility , but i would not actually underestimate the role of the t-62, because i do not include what is in the background lack of bmp-3, the russians will start using the t-62 just as an option to fight our armored vehicles, such a risk that actually exists, i am talking about the fact that it is necessary to effectively use anti-tank means for destruction , including two more if they are massive will appear on the battlefield, at the same time, there is an interesting nuance here, we had a video where we saw that on certain models of tanks there were, conventionally speaking, what

should we call chicken coops, i.e. lattices that were supposed to protect these tanks from javelins and coastguards, as the russian military said later they were removed . olezhe, do you know the details of this story, what happened to these grills on russian tanks , in fact, they were simply removed because in reality the combat operation of such grills led to the fact that the tank orthodoxly turned into a brest tank a grave for two, for a commander and a gunner, and the person who came up with the idea of ​​putting them on tanks, in fact, in my opinion, should be given a certificate of honor from the armed forces of ukraine, because the number of two hundred tankers of the army of the game thanks to these little ones is much more than it could be why? because after hitting a tank with any ufo javelin , that is, any damage, the possibility of evacuating the crew that receives

contusions is extremely difficult. it is impossible at all. that is, even the tankers who could have been saved, the coins remained in these there , that is, another aspect, it was really psychological. that such people there and with such braziers are not capable of anything and this brazier does not protect against anything, but only causes damage, not to mention the fact that in some conditions this brazier itself can fall after an impact and block the hatch in general, that is, it's as simple as that turns into the brest graves are interesting. this video actually shows us. this is a video with these russian tanks with barbecues, as you say. there is a janitor who checks how regiment

commanders and division commanders depend on this tank with barbecue. in fact, we can say that even at such a high level, they they could not assess the risks of their such a-ah analog no eh-e decision regarding tank protection but it is interesting that the enemy uses such a non-standard dead-end solution there, he removes the t-62 from the reserves, he also throws it into battle and does not the latest samples in small quantities when we talk about terminator combat vehicles and support tanks that are used for the offensive on severodonetsk or any information about their use and the effectiveness of these weapons on the field of pain 30-40 because we have very little time, we still need somewhere in the maximum full stop, look when every wunderwaffe is thrown into battle by the enemy - this means that the military equipment is already insufficient for the second time and they received these terminators from the artillery and left because they were simply blinded after how did they beat them, e-e electronics, and what’s more, that

combat module is not armored at all. thank you very much for your comments. thank you for your comments . here is one more piece of information that i want to convey to you, please listen to it, it is important that ukraine should implement the current association agreement with the european union as soon as possible, because in this way, the ukrainian economy can be integrated into the economy of the european union as soon as possible and much closer to ukraine's accession to the european union, this opinion was expressed by the ambassador of the european union to our country in 16-19, hugh exchangegorelli, in an interview with the international columnist of our channel, yuriy fizoru. watch this interview in full on espresso at 22:30 and tomorrow at 3:15 p.m. today 10:30 p.m. tomorrow 3:15 p.m. and let's listen to one of mr. mingareli's friendly advice to our country right now to our ukrainian friends to speed up

political and economic reforms in ukraine in order to use the incredible economic potential of your country, because if you introduce the necessary reforms, you will convince the european leaders that ukraine will not be a burden for the european union, and ukraine is an advantage - it is a country with fantastic potential, if it is used properly, you will be able to convince the political and economic leaders of the eu that it is they who are interested in integrating ukraine to the european union so, the interview of yuriy fizr with the apostle of the european union in ukraine in the years 16-19 of yugo-mingereli today at 22:30 and tomorrow at 15:15 we are with you we're saying goodbye, well, we're starting to say goodbye serhiy zgurets i'm a colleague of the co-presenter, an expert of defense express , uh, military summaries of the day today was thank you, thank you, thank you for being with us, take care, be

aware of the air alarm, together we will go to victory, soon it will be 100 days of war, let's wait and we will win from ukraine now for your attention. good evening. we are from ukraine. the european union was able to refuse russian oil. but not completely , this is the 97th day