ukrainian tv channels to sign the petition first you need to register on the site pittyshenkmu.gov.ua there go to the registration tab and enter all your data, enter your phone number and email, confirm all your data, enter the code that will be sent to your mobile, create a password, it will certify that you are not robot, give consent to the processing of personal data, once again check all your data and click the register button to complete registration , go to your specified email address, where the website letter will come click on the link in the letter, which will return you to the petition site, enter your email, password, enter , we return to the main page of the petition site, open the petition for the return to the digital air of ukrainian tv channels espresso of the fifth and direct press the button to sign the petition, the inscription will appear

signed your signature is confirmed and taken into account, let's return together to cif now ukrainian patriotic channels, we will not let freedom of speech be destroyed in ukraine, the war in ukraine is the main topic for ukrainians , victories and losses, analysis and forecasts, politics and geopolitics, serhiy rudenko will talk about all this and guests of his program people who have information and shape public opinion people who defend ukraine and create the future right now the main and interesting thing in the program is the verdict by serhiy rudenko from monday to thursday at 1:00 p.m. repeat at 9:30 p.m. congratulations, this is news of the economy during the war i

andriy yanitsky, are you watching the espresso tv channels, if you are watching us via the internet, please like and comment. more people will see us. today we will talk about the eu summit, but first i paid attention to the program article of the head of the national bank of ukraine. so, kyrylo shevchenko, the head of the national bank of ukraine, wrote a column for the mirror of the week edition, and there he writes that the country is already used to war and it is necessary to move to market methods of managing the economy, economic logic is beginning to replace the psychological shock of the beginning of the war and the predominance of charitable motives, businesses are trying to maximize profits, and citizens are trying to increase incomes and to protect your savings, writes mr. shevchenko in his column for dz of the week, what does this mean? what does this mean? with rising inflation to the mobilization of the economy and low rates

government bonds will be fought as soon as possible by market methods. that is, they will return to return to the policy of reducing the budget deficit , monitor expenses more carefully, cancel tax benefits for importers , first of all, and possibly increase rates on loans and deposits, e-e. this is how we move from the policy of military manual regulation of the economy to er, to the market er policy of regulating the economy, i don’t know whether it’s too soon, i don’t know, let’s see, from june, immigrants from ukraine who live in poland will start paying for travel at the general rate and right, you see there, too, the shock of the war has already passed and it is returning to normal rules. warsaw is one of the cities that for the longest time granted the right to travel for free in city transport to ukrainians

fleeing the war. how much does it cost to travel in the capital of poland? how is the payment system different from the ukrainian one? chernyakhiv emigrants from ukraine already know well about warsaw transport from june 1 will have to pay according to general rules for more than three months starting from february 24, it was for us free of charge, most of the people we interviewed have already calculated how much they will spend on travel. i'm leaving in a month, they told me that i'll already have a discounted ticket, so it's more profitable for me to chat for a month than to play 110 zlotys a month , valentina says she's already issued a travel card, the troops on this side are charging you photos and if you fill it in, you can use all types of transport that are here in warsaw for free . transport tickets in warsaw are very different

from ukrainian ones. there are daily and three-day tickets here. weekend and group also each one-time ticket has a certain number of hours during which you can use it i and long-term tickets for 30, 90 days or even for a year in warsaw there are no separate tram tickets bus or metro with the same ticket you can go to on all means of transport. how it works is explained by the spokesperson of the city transport department in warsaw. there is a single ticket for all types of transport. it does not matter whether it is a tram or a bus. the ticket is the same when buying a ticket. stops or kilometers, such a basic ticket is designed for 20 minutes, with such a ticket we can go on different types of transport and change and do not need to compost it every time, such a ticket costs 3:40 zlotys, then we have subsequent tickets for 75 - 90 minutes. in simple words, the travel ticket

will allow you to pay a fixed amount of 110 zlotys, which is approximately uah 750 for a month of travel on all transport, there are also long-term tickets for a larger number of months, and special conditions for residents of warsaw who live here and pay taxes , foreigners can also use them ticket 31 for a person who does not live in warsaw and does not pay tax here 110 zlotys and for residents of warsaw 98 zlotys a difference of 12 zlotys to pay for travel in public transport in warsaw, you can use the white by tomato they are located at bus stops similar ticket machines are in every vehicle they are located here and you can also use a qr-code for this you need a smartphone and a special application free travel vehicles have children up to 6 years old, primary school students - this is up to the eighth grade and people over 70 years old, all other

categories of citizens can count on discounts and benefits, for example, a ticket for people over 65 years old costs 50 zlotys, it is valid for a whole year - this is an offer for older people who still under the age of 70, there are also tickets for families with many children . warsaw residents themselves choose payment options. depending on the frequency of trips, i buy one-time tickets for 20 minutes because i bought myself an electric scooter, so i ride it more often instead of the bus. satisfied yes, i heard that there should be an increase in prices. well , i don't like it in warsaw. there are about 1,500 buses on the street every day, more than 400 trams. the metro system is not as big as in kyiv . trains , animals and bicycles can be transported in transport, but there are certain rules, a bicycle can be transported in the

city, which is intended for a baby carriage or a wheelchair, but when a person appears who wants to use this place, for example, a mother with a child or a person in a wheelchair, the cyclist must give up his seat and get out of the transport in warsaw, and buses and trams are air-conditioned, so the doors at the stops do not open automatically. there is a button both outside and inside that you need to press to open the doors. there is a special button that signals the driver that the vast majority of vehicles here were manufactured no more than 6 years ago maria chernyakhivska ihor antonyuk for the espresso tv channel from warsaw well, to understand that that's 110 zlotys per month, that's about 750 hryvnias . imagine this, you need to buy such a ticket to use public transport for a month. we will stay in europe with european news. we will

talk about the eu summit . we will learn from igor buryakovsky, the head of the institute of economic research and political consultations mr. igor vitai so the leaders of european countries gathered for a summit, it was a meeting of the european council if not i'm not mistaken. yes, it was a meeting of the european council, one of the six key institutions of the european union. tell me what it is, because we confuse the council of europe and the european council. of authoritative decision -making bodies in the european union. it meets once a quarter.

heads of countries enter there. countries differently depending on the constitution, depending on the system, who is the highest official in the relevant country, that is, he represents his country in the european council. in principle, it is this body that meets once a quarter, there cannot be extraordinary meetings well, in fact, this otrada, which met for the last time, had such a special start. well, it must be said that the agenda is very, very important , important in the sense that the most sensitive political issues are discussed at these meetings once again i want to say the most sensitive political issues that cannot be resolved by other bodies of the european union and you say a special meeting p ihor excuse me, was it extraordinary or what was his specialty or was there some special topic well, it was extraordinary yes and special from the point of view that in fact it was

devoted to the issues of the war, e.e. russian aggression against ukraine in different dimensions. it was also ukraine, it was also issues related to energy and issues related to security and defense issues related to the food security of the food situation in the world, if we talk about ukraine in particular, then ukraine was present. i don't know. on the first day, in one of the many questions, or, er, in literally every speech, ukraine was mentioned, something other than ukraine was discussed in general. well, of course, questions uh, ukraine was uh, the first item on the agenda, and in addition to uh, ukrainian issues , several things were discussed that usually concern the european union today. the first question is an issue related to food security, and it was not only about the problems of trade in e-e food products, although ukraine was also present here, there was talk of

various initiatives in order to actually provide the world with a sufficient amount of food, and on the other hand, the european union obviously has all the opportunities to to help those countries that are facing the problem of hunger today is the second question - it was a question of energy and here the question was about sanctions as well as about reducing the consumption of russian oil and the introduction of appropriate restrictions on the export of russian oil e-e but at the same time, taking into account the interests of individual members of the european union, at the same time, it is also very important to speed up the transition to a green economy, and it is precisely the green economy that was considered as one of these core areas in order to reduce the dependence of the european union on russian fossil resources. therefore , we will record the food supply simply so that we do not

forget to come back and talk about each point separately about food security, energy, and another very important issue is the issue of security, the european union, as you know, has its own common defense policy, in any case, it is developing a common defense and security policy, and these issues were also actively discussed again in connection with the cooperation of the european union and the north atlantic bloc to the nato blocs well, and also in connection with the challenges created by russian aggression on the european continent well, of course, we are more interested in the first two questions as far as the economic program is concerned the issue of food security is an energy issue and here it seems that ukraine has its own answers regarding food security, please unblock ukrainian ports, help export ukrainian crops by rail and sea, and regarding energy policy, please

impose sanctions, full of oil, full of gas, but they do not listen to what they were arguments why in the sixth package of sanctions. by the way, we talked about it yesterday , uh, also on the program news of the economy during the war, if you haven't seen it, look it up on youtube, yeah this is why the sixth package of sanctions does not include a complete ban on oil exports, on the export of e-e on the import from russia. more precisely, they say that they will not consider the ban on oil and gas. they say that they will not consider the ban . the arguments against and against barva are traditional. russia was and remains the obvious largest supplier of natural gas to the european union market, and it is clear that the complete rejection of european gas requires a series of steps, as far as i understand, the political decision is to to reduce the consumption of russian gas and oil. nevertheless , there are interests of individual countries, in particular

hungary, which they defend, and in principle, precisely because of the sensitive political issues that i spoke about, which i spoke about at the beginning of the previous year, in relation to oil, a kind of palliative, half-hearted decision was made, refusing to supply of oil by sea, but for now the supply of oil by pipeline transport is maintained, but at the same time oil consumption, oil consumption will be reduced, the issue of gas is still being discussed in i would say that for the time being, well, the strategic plan, but a very important decision was made to diversify gas purchases and to use the mechanisms of the european union for this, so that the european union acted, you know , in general. well, the purchasing department conducted a joint policy in the field of procurement gas reserves for communities as early as possible in order not to leave russian threats during the heating season regarding green energy, you as a person who i know that

cooperated a lot with german colleagues, please explain why germany does not consider nuclear energy to be green and cannot replace its resources precisely at the expense of nuclear energy, at the same time we know that france is developing nuclear energy very well and considers it sufficiently ecologically safe ukraine we will also receive more than half of our energy balance from nuclear power plants, i want to say right away that germany is such a unique case in the sense that at one time under the pressure of the green under the pressure of the problems that were in europe connected with the accident at the chornobyl nuclear power plant, the decision was made that let's reduce consumption altogether, abandon the construction of new nuclear power units in order not to have problems with the environment well, not to have problems with

man-made disasters now. in addition, we can talk about the fact that it was obvious at one time to some extent that such ideas, so to speak, were pushed and later by the russian federation, which spoke about the fact that to see there is gas, so let's use this gas . well, nuclear energy, although the russian federation itself is developing energy, that means it has its own advantages, therefore, in this case, the internal political situation just contributed to the decision to limit the use of nuclear power and in general and in general to refuse it at all or to change the german side's position. well, we will see. but for now the situation looks like this. that is, it is more likely that public opinion is also formed in this way and is political a party that is interested in advancing the agenda, and probably, it is possible to think that it is supported by russia, at least informationally, i think so, again, let's not

forget that, in principle, there are questions related to the fact that the green transition is nuclear energy also has its own peculiarities, so not everything is clear here, so to speak, so i think that this is just a discussion that reminds me of a discussion about genetically modified products, on the one hand, they are considered not very useful on the other hand, certain studies and studies that say that muntoska whose harm is exaggerated, and on the third hand, everyone perfectly understands that without the use of new technologies, including genetically modified products, it is very difficult to solve the food problem in the world. today about why europe has not given ukraine a clear signal that ukraine will be a member of the eu, it has not given the status of a candidate for membership during this month, i read that such a

decision may still be made, but hmm, the information that gets into the european media says that they are not very keen on granting the status of a candidate for membership, although this does not mean anything, we know countries that have existed for many years with this status and are not members of the european union. that is, this is just a signal for ukraine. why do they not even want this signal send to us as for the european council, in principle, the european council does not make decisions , so let's just give someone a status, there works accordingly, the procedure is as follows. the european council, by the way, said that it will consider the issue related to the status of ukraine and uh, but the european commission has to prepare the corresponding document, so it was written there that the european council will consider the proposals of the european commission regarding granting or granting ukraine candidate status, therefore, in this sense,

the question is that it should say a closed question simply, if you are not mistaken, somewhere in three weeks there will be another meeting of all the european councils. difficult and very debatable, given the large number of political, economic and internal problems of the european union, it is so and obvious to ukrainian public diplomacy, all ukrainians and all our partners need to increase their pressure on the european union. thank you, mr. igor , we will increase the pressure and mention the status of candidate, the members of the eu and in their economic programs, since the economic profit from it will be large , today all ihor burakovsky, head of the institute of economic research and political consultations every thursday in our program news of the economy during the war watch us on weekdays in the morning and in the evening i am andriy yanitsky tv channel

espresso together we will win good evening we are from ukraine vasyl zima's big broadcast my name is vasyl zima two hours of airtime until 9:00 p.m. two hours of your time, we will talk about the most important things for two hours to find out about the war, serhiy zhoretska will broadcast the military results of the day and what is the world? protest by oleksandr borshchivtsi he talks about the economy during the war and new sports yevhen pastukhov is ready to talk about sports for two hours in the company of his favorite presenters about culture during the war he is ready to talk about the war or something else presenters who have become familiar to many, maybe the weather will at least give us some optimism ms. natalka didenko is ready to tell us, and we will also have a distinguished guest of the studio today, volodymyr grishko, if

everything goes well, the events of the day in two hours , vasyl's big broadcast in winter, a project for intelligent and caring people in the evening nayspresso good evening we are from ukraine thank you thank you thank you thank you military boiled viber 099 214-60-40 and our presenters will announce everything at once everything will be ukraine well and now there is an information and analytical marathon on the air of the espresso tv channel the most important hyper important and archive important 8:22

minute two - in june, together with khrestyna yatskiv, we will analyze the most important events of the day and try to look at tomorrow. addition to the general picture for today's morning kharkiv region fires caused by enemy shelling occurred in the zolochiv community of bogodukhiv district of chuguyivsk in the chuguyiv district of the region, as well as in the kyiv and slobid districts directly in kharkiv, private houses , farm buildings, a school and an industrial building were damaged as a result of shelling of the private sector in the village of kluhino and bashkirivka of chuguivsk district, an enemy projectile hit a residential building as a result of shelling, men were injured as a result of shelling in the kharkiv district of kyiv, a fire broke out at night during extinguishing. rescuers found the body of a woman

. four people were saved. serhiy gaidai of luhansk oda . yesterday morning, rockets fired several times at the nitrogen compound, hitting one of the administrative buildings and a warehouse where methanol was stored in the city hospital was damaged in lysychansk, 52 more houses were damaged on june 1 in the mountains, 16 houses were damaged by the enemy in lysychansk, 15 in vrubivka, 9 in severodonetsk, 6, novodruzhetska, four, and mykolaivtsi, two, severodonetsk, the enemy continues to carry out assaults with mortar support, an unsuccessful assault was carried out in the direction of the settlements of bebrove and ustinivka. thanks to khrystyna for this comprehensive

information, well, we are now adding to our information marathon pavel zhebrivskyi , the commander of the unit of the fighting brotherhood of ukraine, the head of the donetsk regional military-civilian administration in the years 15-18 glory to ukraine, mr. zhebrivsky glory to the heroes so, we would like to ask you to give an assessment of the tactics of the operational situation that hrystyna yatskiv just voiced, we understand that the battles are going on, we understand how difficult it is, to put it mildly, the situation in north donetsk, what are the prospects if the enemy will begin to expand the capture of this strategic city, but in reality, of course , the situation is difficult and our boys are fighting with the girls, they are fighting in the country in luhansk region, and today positions have already been prepared that are fortified and for which there is a possibility that our armed forces will withdraw, the

tactics used by the commander-in-chief of the general staff are to preserve the lives of ukrainian soldiers and the future counteroffensive and the liberation of the territory. of course, you can cling to the ruins, but enough will die. there is a problem with that set of ammunition and we cannot pour even half of what is poured into ukrainian life, in fact, if you look at katsaps, katsaps are not needed, they do not need infrastructure, they need ukrainian people why they are deporting such a number to muscovy, and in this part of the er-e tactic they have chosen this way and it is threatening, it is actually the destruction of the infrastructure, the destruction of buildings, the destruction of everything and after that the

seizure of some territory, for the moskovites, human life does not have a single seven. i watched you this e- eh , the intelligence that allowed us to go even at the beginning, and eh, putin allowed, in fact, the death of somewhere between 30-5,50, 30,000, this is acceptable, 50,000 is, well, the death of moscow soldiers, well, criminals, murderers , and in this direction is of no importance to him. how much does ukraine dispose of this bio waste for ukrainian military leaders - it is the preservation of the lives of ukrainians and not only that, i want to say that it is suitable even despite the war in the ukrainian e-e command, to put it mildly, is quite democratic

, in fact, only with the consent of the evacuation, that is, for today there approximately 10,000 ukrainian citizens remain in north donetsk for various reasons. they do not want to evacuate from there and did not want to. some of them, older people say that for the rest of their lives, acquired a house, left the orcs will actually destroy and everything will be destroyed, there is a small part of those who are actually waiting for russian measures, and how in liman there is a mother, forgive me, god, and that pip whom i know, and we met e katsaps with bread and salt , there are also such in this direction. we do not even evacuate because it is a development it was difficult for ukrainian soldiers to carry out a sufficiently serious military countermeasures , and how much preservation is important in the lives of ukrainian soldiers, in fact we are observing

the withdrawal of ukrainian troops somewhere, not a panic flight, not in fact, in principle, everything has disappeared, but a withdrawal to it is early in the preparations, but how should this change the general position somewhere in luhansk region, we understand that at the moment not so many square kilometers of luhansk region remain under our control and foreign minister putin is a military criminal, so to speak, lavrov stated that they set themselves the goal of getting out to the administrators of the borders of our ukrainian luhansk region and donetsk region , but in fact, if you look at the severo- donetsk lysichansky bakhmuto, they are in such a way, well, they are not surrounded, but they are half surrounded, if you look at such a performance, it comes with our armed forces and in in this case, of course, from three sides, they can shower us with fire and artillery and

attack aircraft and helicopters, but that is to say, this once again confirms that lavrov is a war criminal, a world criminal, and in principle they say that we need some kind of political fulfillment of the task set by putin . you know that then he set the task to reach the administrative border of the luhansk region by june 1st and to reach the administrative border of the donetsk region by july 1st. well, today is the second time and in principle the exit to the borders of the luhansk region does not shine. but today, if you look at the temporary occupation and territories or the lives of ukrainian soldiers , the ukrainian team actually chooses the lives of ukrainian soldiers .