damn lisa for ukraine well, the most important thing is that this is the third world war, now officially we are actually fixing the fact that we are in a state of war, this is the third world war, it is already going on, this is what needs to be fixed, it is the initial phases , it will not necessarily be nuclear, but at this stage it имеать места быты это third world war point is, we declare war, that is, this is how it should be . yes, that is, we say. you declared war on us. including whether we will exist in the form in which we are or we will not succeed. russia's special operation in ukraine ended in the consulate that the most real war has started, what about the third world war? in connection with the decision of the united states of america to provide ukraine with rocket systems with salvo fire,

president joe biden wrote about this in an article for the newspaper for the new york times, in the same place biden responded to a proposal to save putin's face, the usa will provide ukraine with billions of dollars in financial aid and support the regime of sanctions against the russian federation, russia must pay a high price for aggression, i will not put pressure on the ukrainian government publicly or privately in order to induce it to make any territorial concessions, biden also wrote tezovo answered all the negatives of russian nazi propaganda, the main thing is that we are not looking for a war between nato and russia until the usa or our allies are attacked, we will not directly participate in this conflict, by not sending american troops to fight in ukraine or attacking russian forces, the united states will not try to organize putin's expulsion from power in moscow, ukraine's negotiations with russia have reached a dead end not because ukraine seems to have turned its back on diplomacy, they have reached a dead end because russia continues to wage war to take under its control as much

of ukraine as possible. still does not see russia intending to use nuclear weapons, but its rhetoric and threats are irresponsible. vladimir putin did not expect of such a degree of unity and strength of our response, he was wrong if he expected that in the coming months we will falter or break, he is also wrong , so the russian propagandists now have something to talk about, after they will put their eyes on it, it will not reach the moldavia of belgorod, it will reach and what the russian people will say. well, okay here is zhenya from belgorod, there is vladivostok, i think the gateway city will definitely not reach it, i will be less worried about belgorod or the course to which it is already reaching now from the point of ul other shells that's not the case, that's not the case, a projectile from the american system will reach any city, at least to yours, even to tula. as far as i know my native, the fact is

that he can even cross the russian border, and then this country that supplies this weapon will be officially involved in this armed conflict and then we will officially have to answer the question, how will the answer to this question surprise you ? installations of operational tactical rockets, but there are variants of the russian army, well, there is nothing deadly seven kilometers away, of course, this is serious, but our tornado is better, our hurricane is better, that’s right, but it will be a different quality. this means that

the americans entered the war with us and we will strike at the place of decision -making. systems i will appear, i am confident that they are not a fracture and the famous three sevens, the radioactive pipe is canceled, it is not what we thought next, this strategist who told us that such strikes must be carried out, but ukrainian cities will finally be bombed after kyiv. words about hitting new york or great britain, of course, i have not yet had the opportunity to listen to the recent speeches of members of the state duma zhuravlyov, there will definitely be something there, but on another russian tv channel, another military expert also began to explain that everything is not easy and it is not possible to take and bomb

like this, but if i were to say that ours acted strictly according to the law of the military, yes, it was already in ukraine, and the troops were already standing on the borders of poland somewhere one and a half years after february 24, then there is a huge number of red lines which uh means uh clearly they look through a lot of shadows the output of their choice which is vernychyavatsya which does not allow it to be made more powerful here are the questions of strikes on the governing bodies two or three days, a couple of months, but what kind of red lines do we have? he says interestingly, you will appear at the door , it cannot be state overreach. a brave man must fight on the air of the federal channel is it about dmitry medvedev, whose son has

us citizenship, or about sergey lavrovych 's daughter in england or oh god kabaev with children in switzerland, that the third world does not come out convincingly the war of the russian federation is coming, but the west does not want to attack the russian sadness, it is good that he declared war on us , the question itself, well, let's declare war on the west, and yes , name it. mind this, fight, so they will shrug their shoulders and say. well, what will 4 countries declare? yes, we are making a political declaration что раз смотрим сомединный статы , германию, германия, польша, as parties to the conflict in ukraine. i'm still looking for someone better than japan as a boy to be an economic business. yes, i just can't find it. japan is in a pre-crisis, let's go there.

asphalt, yes, from turkey, it is difficult for us, where in general, we need turkey, of course, it will bring ukraine out of the war, but we are not interested in having some new quests come to turkey, the american general, about the american general. well, that’s right. he lived half his life counting with him, what is the name of the president of turkey? yes , uh, but japan is not pitiful in any way, so let's try. let's see what kind of economic muscles we have. the financial crisis, well, you can say anything in the lamp atmosphere of home comfort, but on the federal channels you still have to maintain some realism, how to create a problem on this beautiful foggy island that will make the british dig a little deeper? well, problems. well, we

listen to the soviet space we can do everything like this, we are not skilled and clumsy in the international area. promotes the opposite side of the radio, on the one hand, they say that they are fighting with nato, on the other hand, that nato is made of wood, does not want to fight, on the one hand, that nato is about to go to pasture, on the other hand, that nato is so worthless and unable to defend itself, что такое nato сегодня vzdudonskogo paper tiger or a voice on clay feet in fact it is so well then it is necessary to solve two tasks in relation to ukraine it is new new weapons supplies and training over only does not represent anything at all how the organization supplies separate countries from this here is tovarysh - this is not what our former friend staltenberg said in the second place. yes, he only talks, he does nothing. nato, as an organization, turned out to be

an absolute dummy, or this is what they still say about weapons, they constantly say that they give us something. and we do not have these weapons in the amount that we need them for the de-blockade of our territory, that is, they are simply to please their societies, they say that they provide a lot of aid to ukraine, but this is not so . not so nato is afraid at all, we understood that the nato alliance is an alliance for hollywood, well, it is a beautiful brand. oh, it must be some kind of mistake, it is the office of the president. and why does he say the same thing as russia, and i don't understand why he says that, i understand why this is what the russian propagandists of the russian federation attacked ukraine precisely because they were sure that they would not receive a response from the west. the kremlin, having convinced itself that nato is weak or indecisive, no one will

dare to fight the russian army on all points, the russians were wrong, but why exactly repeats the employees of zelenskyi's office right now. we are disappointed that in ukraine they do not give more weapons and they are not as powerful as we would like, but such statements at the moment of the provision of missile systems, do you at all help or harm? where is the line between reasonable pressure on allies and narcissism, which only annoys moreover, podolyak repeats verbatim the soviet propaganda that tried to downplay the influence of lend-lease in world war ii. and what he does not tell is that without the help of the allies, we would have nothing to shoot at ourselves. there are almost no more shells, and you are not at all to blame for this, the people who two years before the full-scale invasion of the russian federation were telling us how we do not need to join nato, how we need to look putin in the eye, who did not give money for the production of weapons, who arrested combat generals, removed klystrons

from ppu systems, thanks to which we did not find ourselves completely unarmed before an enemy attack again, as it was already in the 14th year, and now they continue to tell that there are some security guarantees for neutral countries. no, friends in the real world you promise to fight for someone and then these countries promise to fight for you and in the real world this is called a defensive union if you do not promise anything to anyone then no one owes you anything and in case of an attack on your country and other countries will help only out of goodwill and as they themselves want , this is happening with ukraine now, and thanks to the irresistible attraction of generations of ukrainian government officials to the third way and multi-vectorism, we are now hearing about such things.

the problem is that the anti-western and anti-nato rhetoric of some people surrounded by zelensky creates the impression that at least somewhere in ukraine, russians are happy for russians here, they are not happy where we need to stay home, we should stay, i think we should stay where we are welcome, you shit, no one yalynivka this is a prison in the donetsk region. where most of the defenders of azovstal are currently held, and pavel astakhov, who told this, is a lawyer appointed by the fsb as a fighter for human rights in russia. it seems that he took part in interrogations

of ukrainian prisoners somewhere in the same capacity in which medvedchuk once participated in the case of a protest like a public defender. and what he told is an important testimony for us, how the russian federation is trying to falsify the trial of the anti-defense forces in mariupol. may god grant us all to be as steadfast as those ukrainian soldiers. and i wanted to b that the employees of the president's office have the same firm ukrainian convictions that it hangs the enemies and not our allies, let's meet, it is very important in this difficult time to be aware of the fact that is happening, we tell the news and help to understand the events, however, the war can make its own corrections in case the broadcast signal is lost, watch espresso on the satellite now espresso has become available on two satellites at once viewers who watch our channel on the astra satellite should

reset the tuner to new parameters, because the old ones parameters will soon stop broadcasting espresso ukrainian view thank you for watching . congratulations, this is the news of the economy during the war. i am andriy yanitskyi, you are watching espresso tv channel if watch us on the internet, please like it, comment like this, more people will see us, today we will talk about the eu summit, but first i paid attention to the program article of the head of the national bank of ukraine so kyrylo shevchenko , the head of the national bank of ukraine, wrote a column for the edition of the mirror of the week, and there he writes that already the country is used to war and it is necessary to switch to market methods of managing the economy, economic logic is beginning to replace the psychological shock of the beginning of the war and the predominance of charitable motives

business is trying to maximize profits and citizens to increase incomes and protect their savings, writes mr. shevchenko in his column for the mirror of the week. to return to the policy of reducing the budget deficit, monitor expenses more carefully, cancel tax benefits for importers first of all, and possibly increase rates on loans and deposits this is how we are moving from a policy of military manual regulation of the economy to an e-e to a market e-e policy of economic regulation soon , i do not know

. right, you see there, too, the shock of the war has already passed and it is returning to normal rules. warsaw is one of the cities that for the longest time granted the right to travel free of charge in city transport to ukrainians fleeing the war, how much does it cost to travel in the capital what is the difference between the payment system of poland and the ukrainian one? let's see. they told me that i will already have a ticket for the month of may, so it is more profitable for me. it shows 110 zlotys per month . valentina says that she has already issued a travel card and if you replenish it, you can use all the modes of transport that are here in warsaw for free. tickets for transport in warsaw are very different

from ukrainian ones, there are daily, three-day weekend and group tickets, and each one-time ticket has a certain number of hours during which you can i use it and long-term tickets for 30, 90 days or even for a year in warsaw there are no separate tickets for the tram bus or metro with the same ticket you can travel in all means of transport how it works is explained by the spokesperson of the city transport department they wrote her single ticket for all types of transport and here it does not matter whether it is a tram or a bus, the ticket is the same, when buying a ticket it is indicated how many minutes it is, not only stops or kilometers, such a basic ticket is designed for 20 minutes with such a ticket we we can travel by different modes of transport and change trains and it is not necessary to compost it every time, such a ticket costs 3:40 zlotys, then we have the following tickets for 75 - 90 minutes, those who travel daily should take care of obtaining a map of the city in simple words of the travel card, it will allow you to pay a fixed

amount of 110 zlotys, that is approximately uah 750 per month for travel on all transport, there are also long-term tickets for a larger number of months, special conditions for residents of warsaw who live here and pay taxes, foreigners can also use them to use ticket 31 and for a person who does not live in warsaw and does not pay tax here 110 zlotys and for residents of warsaw 98 zlotys a difference of 12 zlotys similar ballots are in every vehicle they are here and you can also use a qr-code for this you need a smartphone and special application children up to 6 years of age, elementary school students - this is up to the eighth grade, and people over 70 years old, all other categories of citizens can count on discounts and benefits, such as a ticket

for people over 65, it costs 50 zlotys, it is valid for the whole year - it is an offer for older people who have not yet reached 70 years old, as well as tickets for large families, residents of warsaw themselves choose payment options. depending on the frequency of trips, i buy one-time tickets for 20 minutes because i bought them for myself electric scooter, that's why i ride it more often instead of the bus. yes, i'm satisfied with everything. but i heard that there should be an increase in prices. well, i don't like it. in warsaw, there are about one and a half thousand buses and more than 400 trams on the street every day. the metro system is not as big as in kyiv, in warsaw there are two branches of the metro on which several dozen trains run during the day , animals and bicycles can be transported in the transport, but there are certain rules, a bicycle can be transported in the city, which is intended for a stroller or a wheelchair, but

when there is a person who wants to use this place, for example, a mother with a child or a person in a wheelchair, then the cyclist must vacate the place and get out of the transport in warsaw, buses and trams, and therefore the doors at the stops are not air-conditioned they open automatically, there is a button both outside and inside that you need to press in order for the doors to open. there are also custom stops in the middle of the vehicle. there is a special button that signals the driver that it is necessary to stop. the vast majority of vehicles here were manufactured no more than 6 years ago. warsaw well, to understand what 110 zlotys per month is about 750 hryvnias. imagine this, you need to buy such a ticket to ride public transport for a month. we will stay in europe with with european news, let's talk about the eu summit,

the leaders of the european union gathered together on may 30 to 31, they discussed something, what exactly we will learn from igor buryakovsky, the head of the institute of economic research and political consultations, mr. igor vitai so the leaders of the european countries gathered for the summit, it was a meeting of the european council if i'm not mistaken. so it was a meeting of the european council, one of the six key institutions of the european union . tell me what it is, because we are confusing the council of europe and the european council pas eh, what is the difference between the european council, what is it, who is included in it, the european council is one of the most authoritative decision-making bodies in the european union. it meets once every quarter , the leaders of the countries enter, once again i want to say the leaders of all the member states of the european union

the president, the prime minister, well, in different countries , in different ways, depending on the constitution, depending on the system, who is the highest official in the relevant country, that is, he represents his country in the european council in principle, this is this body that meets once a quarter, there cannot be extraordinary meetings . well, in fact, this is the council that met last time. it had such a special start. well, it must be said that the order is not very important, it is important in the sense that at these meetings , the most sensitive political issues are discussed , i want to say once again the most sensitive political issues that cannot be resolved by other bodies of the european union, and you say a special meeting, ihor, i'm sorry, it was extraordinary what was his specialty or was there any special topic? well, it was extraordinary . yes, and it was special from the point of view that it was actually devoted to the issues of the war of russian

aggression against ukraine in different dimensions. it was ukraine and it was also issues related to energy , issues related to security and defense, issues related to food security, the food situation in the world, if we talk specifically about ukraine, ukraine was present. i don't know. on the first day, in one of the many issues or uh ukraine was mentioned in literally every speech, something other than ukraine was discussed in general well, of course, ukraine was the first item on the agenda, and in addition to ukrainian issues, several things were discussed that usually concern the european union today, the first question - this issue is related to food security, and it was not only about the problems of trade in e-e food products , although ukraine was also present here, they talked

about various initiatives in order to actually to provide the world with a sufficient amount of food, and on the other hand, the european union obviously has all the opportunities to help those countries that today face the problem of hunger, and the second question - it was a question of energy , and here the question was about sanctions, and about reducing consumption of russian oil and the introduction of relevant restrictions on the export of russian oil . acceleration of the transition to a green economy, and precisely the green economy was considered as one of such key directions in order to reduce the dependence of the european union on russian fossil resources. therefore , we will record food and food just so that we do not forget to return and after each

point to talk separately about energy supplies, which is another very important issue, this is a security issue, the european union, as you know, has its own common defense policy, in any case, the common defense and security policy and these issues were also actively discussed again in connection with the cooperation of the european union and the north atlantic bloc to the nato blocs well, and also in connection with the challenges created by russian aggression on the european continent well, for us, of course, how economic the program we are most interested in is the first two questions, the question of food security, the question of energy, and here it seems that ukraine has its own answers regarding food security, please unblock ukrainian ports, help to export ukrainian crops by rail and sea, and regarding the energy policy, please impose sanctions, full of oil, full of gas, but they won’t

listen to what were the arguments why in the sixth package of sanctions. wartime, if you haven't seen it, look in the sky, yes, that's why, in the sixth package of sanctions, there is no complete ban on the export of oil, on the export, on the import from russia. arguments against against varva, they are traditional, they are known in principle. the fact is that russia was and remains, it is obvious, the largest supplier of natural gas to the market of the european union, and it is clear that the complete rejection of european gas requires a series of steps. that is exactly how i understand the political decision is about reducing the consumption of russian gas and oil but nevertheless there are interests of individual countries, in particular hungary, which they defend and, in principle, precisely

those sensitive political issues that i am talking about spoke about which i spoke at the beginning of the year regarding oil, a kind of palliative half-hearted decision was made, abandoning the supply of oil by sea, but for now the supply of oil by pipeline transport is maintained, but at the same time, oil consumption, oil consumption will be reduced, the issue of gas is still being discussed in this way. i would say so far what about the strategic plan, but a very important decision was made to diversify the purchase of gas and to use the mechanisms of the european union for this so that the european union acted, i know the general well, the procurement department conducted a joint policy in the field of procurement and at the same time on the communities in gas reserves as early as possible in order not to leave russian threats during the heating season and regarding green energy, you as a person who i know that i

have cooperated a lot with german colleagues. please explain why germany does not consider nuclear power to be green and cannot replace its resources precisely at the expense of nuclear power in at the same time, we know that france is developing nuclear energy very well and considers it sufficiently ecologically safe. well, in ukraine , too, we will receive more than half of our energy balance from nuclear power plants. under the pressure of the green under the pressure of the problems that were in europe connected with the accident at the chernobyl nuclear power plant just then the decision was made that let's reduce consumption altogether we will abandon the construction of new nuclear power units in order not to have problems with the environment, we will not have problems with man-made disasters now. in addition, we

can talk about the fact that it was obvious at one time to some extent that such ideas, so to speak, were pushed by the russian federation, which spoke about the fact that there is gas, so let's use this gas. well, nuclear energy, although the russian federation itself is developing energy, so it has its advantages, so in this case, just right this internal political situation just contributed to the decision to limit the use of the atom and in general and in general to refuse it altogether or to change the german side's position well, we will see . a political party that is interested in advancing the agenda and probably. you can think that it is supported by russia, at least informationally, i think so. but again, let's don't forget that, in principle, there are questions

related to the green transition, it also has its own special attitude to nuclear energy , so not everything is clear-cut, so to speak, so i think that this is just a discussion that reminds me of a discussion about of genetically modified products, on the one hand, they are considered not very useful, on the other hand, there are certain studies that say that, well, the harm from such is exaggerated, and on the third hand, everyone perfectly understands without the use of new technologies in that among the number of genetically modified products, it is very difficult to solve the food problem in the world. well, why