you in exchange for the unblocking of sanctions against belarus itself, this is a transition to such a hybrid war, which in principle was used by russia since 2014. from russia enter the world market in exchange for the fact that russia itself allows ukraine to trade its grain through essentially its own infrastructure, because the belarusian infrastructure is essentially a branch infrastructure of the russian federation, okay, this will mean that russia gets the opportunity to circumvent world sanctions with the help of this belarusian

window, in principle, again, the model has been tried since 2014, which worked quite effectively, and then, by the way, this model can be used in other economic sectors all the time exchange, let's say some important things for russia for some agreement with certain actions russia knows how to blackmail knows how to find reasons for blackmail knows how to find real chances to use certain opportunities own in order to overcome these difficulties that are created for his regime in order to destroy it. the third point is also very important, that probably with

the help of russian propaganda, the illusion is also created that russia can quickly collapse in the information space. vladimir putin, that's all he is, one operation, the second, the third, people have such an idea that eventually everything will end soon, that's it, then he'll die, russia itself must relax soon will collapse, ukraine will be strong, russia will be weak, and of course, with the help of military equipment supplied from the west, ukraine will be able to easily and without particular problems recapture its territory, but there is such an important point that russia, which had enough modern equipment and modern troops, could not

occupy our territories that we defended now the russians are guarding these territories that they captured with military equipment, there may be a certain pality when we get everything that the west promises, how obvious is it that i am simply not a military man an expert there, i think each of you that we will easily recapture such territories of ours, the absolutely right-wing president of ukraine who says that he will not release the occupied territories until modern equipment arrives so as not to be exposed to large casualties among the ukrainian military, but together with this, it is such a dialectic, the situation allows the russians to create time for themselves in order to strengthen themselves in the occupied territories and go further as far as they can go. you saw that everything is not so good with them

happens as it wants, but for now it is absolutely accurate that the figure given by the president of ukraine is 20% of the ukrainian territory is occupied, which of course is significantly different from this figure that was at the time of the russian invasion on february 24, 2022 and allows us to say that in these 100 days vladimir putin has moved from blitzkrieg to the salami tactics, the following question now arises. and can , in principle, hostilities end, that the potential of the parties will run out of troops if, relatively speaking, russia simply will not be able to fight with us, that's why that it will not have the strength to, er, continue military operations in order to build up the technical

potential, and russia is also not conducting mobilization there , so does it mean that the human potential is limited? yes, i believe that there may come a certain moment when it becomes clear that military operations cannot continue like this always happens in such protracted conflicts, we do not know after how long 100 days after 200 days after 300 days it is difficult to say when we will see such a situation again for this you need to be a military expert to sit down with one by one, take a piece of paper, where will the russian military human potential be, here is the ukrainian military potential, see how they exhaust this clash and where is the moment when it is clear that both countries cannot fight what they have destroyed from a military point of view and then we can give the correct answer to this question is purely mathematical, although it is obvious that it will be disappointing

also for this left sheet of paper in ukrainian, but even if you and i understand this simple truth, we need to understand something else such a war will end at the negotiating table, we see that the president of ukraine, volodymyr zelenskyy, hopes for this. he keeps saying that negotiations cannot begin when the ukrainian territory is liberated there, at least as zelenskyy says on the line on february 24, 2022, well, again , i have no idea that the ukrainian troops stop on this line, the russian troops agree with this, it is on this line that i can imagine that there could be some other lines of stopping the parties well, let's say there are administrative borders of donetsk for the russians, the luhansk regions are the state border of ukraine for us, but you already know that. they are subjective

opinions . they have nothing against me. took a stronger position during the negotiations. well, it's also a good idea, but what will happen if there are no negotiations? we always think in categories and pronounce yesterday's words something. it was the first phase of the war between ukraine and russia in 2014 it ended with the minsk agreements, the presidents met and signed these agreements with their participation, maybe now it will be possible to sign some kind of peace agreement, only it will be more beneficial for us, not the one that was signed in minsk, which will not provide for some kind of autonomous status for donbass, that well, it

doesn't even matter what we are hoping for here during such victories, the main thing is that they will introduce peace. and what will happen if, in principle, there will be no peace work, if vladimir putin does not consider it necessary to sign with ukraine any peace agreement. well, a special military operation or it is announced that it has achieved its goals is terminated, but normal relations with ukraine are not restored, or it is said that a break is made in a special military operation, say, in order to ensure normal conditions for holding a referendum in donetsk luhansk , the so-called people's republics to join the russian federation well, there may be many devices to stop hostilities but at the same time, do not announce that there are agreements between the countries although

i don't see any particular meaning in these agreements, it's just a stoppage of hostilities, let's say a stoppage of infantry and tanks, but the missile attacks on the infrastructure continue, we see that they are also now, but they will continue on the territory of the country, and it will be absolutely clear that russia does not see any settlement of the situation, that its the conditions are known, ukraine must recognize the russian status of crimea, donbas, announce that it is not joining nato, demilitarization, denazification, i want to remind you that during all these 100 days of war, russian the requirements for ukraine have not changed at all. we were all the time there looking for any possible hints that these conditions have changed. you see, medinsky said such a list, but he did not mention it. and lavrov said such a list, he did not mention it, but in fact all that strange nonsense a set

of demands that essentially justifies russia's readiness to fight in the future and to prove its right to such demands with the help of force, it remains, this may also be the situation at the time of the end of the active hostilities, the active phase has ended, but we are in a situation of uncertainty, whether we should abolish martial law, the question of how long we can live in it, provided that there are no active hostilities, whether to continue or allow the departure of men abroad in such a situation, or to continue to keep people within the borders of the country without obvious mobilization, the question of whether to return to

people who left for ukraine in such a situation, what will be the place to return to, because we are now talking again, not for today, for a day when they can still be destroyed, that new cities are new, that this the only pro-structural object is whether to stay abroad or return to their husbands for such families or vice versa for men to leave for their families. if they settle somehow in european countries and there is work here, let's say there is no question of whether to invest in such an economy in which there are no guarantees so far of security should we wait until these guarantees in the form of peace agreements appear and it will

at least be clear which territory is safe i mean geographically for investments in general fourth question fifth question and if there is no such investment, how will the country's economy develop and how will it provide jobs in the absence of development prospects, a good question, and when we ask these questions, they are not military, we move into the plane in which vladimir putin feels, as i already said, like a fish in water in the plane of the special operation. i think that it has already begun, seriously, because we see next to the war that continues, that has not ended,

the results of which we absolutely do not know and do not imagine, we do not know the answers to any of the questions in in what form the state sovereignty of ukraine will be preserved, in what borders, with how many citizens , with what economic potential, with what security guarantees, there is no answer, but in ukrainian society, i think that you have noticed already in these 100 days, such a relaxation has begun, which can create the illusion that we are no longer living just the expected victories, and after the victory, we have to think about how to live after the victory, and how to get power after the victory, and national unity, which, i would say,

changed the attitude towards us in the west, which became inspiration at the event for the first time during the week of the war was that they saw that the entire ukrainian political class and supporters of various political forces, from populists to national democrats and even some former pro-russian politicians who changed their ideas about life together against this influx, even those who were dreamers, are returning to realism that those who warned about the danger of war in the event of certain electoral decisions of ukrainian citizens, do not reproach them compatriots and together with them defend the motherland that those who were wrong in their attitude towards russia and was such an ambassador of the russian world, he speaks out loud about his mistakes and

enlists in the territorial defense, now all this is actually gone and it is terrible because it shows what state ukrainian society will be in after the end of hostilities and how russia will be able to use this state of war the post-war state for a new blow to our state, already an internal blow, a blow that may be even more significant for the war-weary ukrainian state than the war itself. i want to remind you of an eternal tradition the amplitude of ukrainian statehood from the uprising to the decline of the uprising, the disappointment of the uprising, the collapse of the enthusiasm, the hope for quick changes, the disappointment as

a result, in the recent history of ukraine, this was the case after each of the maidans, in fact, on the verge of complete degradation of state institutions, the uprising of a passionate part of society kept the state from the final collapse, so that later electoral decisions directed the ukrainian the state to correct this false line and not lead to a new collapse, so it can happen even after the war, because war is also a national impulse, of course the best moment in our history was somehow we

managed to prevent war, but that is also not all in our power, a war is already a war - it is a huge impulse of the national spirit, which naturally decreases with each new day, the continuation of such things of local hostilities, and this is also understood in russia, they understand that the longer this war continues, the more the national, economic, and moral potential of ukrainian statehood will be depleted, and they will do everything to ensure that the war does not end as long as russia manages to keep the possibilities for the continuation of this war. and what about the potential, well, this is also an important point that needs to be said. we started discussing completely insignificant

things from different planes again, and when i say that i get from discussions about it, i will not talk about the subject now this discussion is happening not only on social networks, but also on the television screen. i say, you know the person with whom i could debate, i may die tomorrow during military operations, military operations, people who discuss with this person, tomorrow they can lose their home, become refugees, leave the country and never come back here. all political discussions have no meaning until we understand who will remain alive and who will remain living in ukraine. there is no answer to this question and for a long time there will be nothing to discuss when the war is going on which promises to be a long cruel

exhausting tragic what to discuss when we don't even know what state we are in. someday the war will end and when we can say to ourselves that it ended, what is victory day, we knew it for sure when it was last, victory day is when the army enters the capital of the enemy state, it is obvious that now it is not such a war at all, so i am not talking about the fact that no one declared this war to anyone, russia only scares that she can declare a real war against ukraine. although i don't really

understand that this will change. we don't even scare russia by declaring war on her, we still hope that the wars are over. this is the liberation of our territory. i always say that i know what's for me. to end the wars - this is the complete territorial integrity of ukraine with the simultaneous accession of ukraine to nato, then i will be able to breathe a sigh of relief and say, dear compatriots, at least in the next decade, there will be no war between russia and ukraine. and if russia still decides to fight with nato member states, well, what then ukrainian soldiers will have to die on the front of this great global war of the third world war, but no one will avoid this, we will share the common fate of a continent that can lose in such a war

millions of its inhabitants and let's hope that russia's awareness that it will be a nuclear war of extermination prevents it from such a war, although it is impossible to give guarantees, there may not be a nuclear war between all of them, and ukraine will then be part of this struggle, but this is a very small percentage, you see now on the territory of the crime center nothing is happening and now russia is working on internal destabilization of nato - this is hunger, hope for migration crises, destabilization of the continent, this is tenna what will russia be working on in the coming months inspired and confident, it is clear, but such political crises are not wars, you can get out of them, as you understand, i think that for each of my compatriots

, the answer to the question of what victory is is our own, this is also our problem, we need to reach a consensus regarding the understanding of victory, otherwise, what for some there will be a victory and they will celebrate it, for others it will just be a short break before a new test, and here again the question arises, and for whom will it be a break, or will they want to live in the same state with those who already percentage of victory and does not understand that tomorrow new bombs may be dropped on them and tomorrow enemy troops will come to their land again, he does not want to give himself an account in this, too, a good question of questions more than answers 100 days of this conflict this and this one of mine is determined by the questions for

now more than an answer, the main thing is that we have an answer to the question of how our armed forces operate, that we can be proud of our armed forces, and i am not surprised by this, because the armed forces are a part of our people, this is what has always served us the ability to survive in the conditions of a weak state, inefficient state institutions, in the conditions of the enemy’s struggle with our state institutions and the state as such, in the conditions of creating numerous informative political provocations of any kind , then the will of the ukrainian people to preserve the state turned out to be much greater than the ability of

our enemy to engage in this daily destabilization of ukrainian statehood which has already been observed for 31 years in a row and will be observed for as long as in russia the forces of modernity will be enough for this russia what is the program in its development, they see that a winnist program that develops extensively with the help of seizing other people's territories, this is the moment that i want to talk about, and that is why we see that the armed forces are saving us from all those numerous and seemingly irreparable mistakes that will be made as

two maidans saved us twice from the irreparable mistakes of the voters and the state structure. this is an incredible phenomenon of ukrainian civilization, a phenomenon that the enemy does not take into account because the enemy works in the paradigm of a strong and effective vertical states are simply something built in built-in armed forces built-in society all this exists simply on the instructions of the tsar in this there is a huge difference between russian and ukrainian political civilization, but this does not mean that we have nothing to learn from those who are already creating a home for

ukraine which year no imagine about of our society devoted to the preservation of ukraine in relation to our armed forces that defend the state and are already moving into a counterattack. imagine that a citizen voter and an effective state would be added to this how could we look in the future, not in the next 10-20 years, which will be difficult , of course, economically, politically, socially, we are entering the most difficult period of our recent history, which will not be resolved quickly, but in the future, that is, in the future, which will begin in 20-25 years and when we will be in the european union, when we will be similar to neighboring countries in terms of potential and level

of development, our immediate task after the end of the war is to build such a strong and effective state , the ukrainian voter no longer has the right to relax into irresponsibility, into not understanding the consequences of your actions, because these consequences are killing him physically, taking away the perspective of his children and even grandchildren, this has already been done so many times in these 30 years, so many times we have seen a blatant demonstration of this thread and irresponsibility that should have destroyed ukraine and did not so much because we have a society and armies that we no longer want to live to this and after the war, these 100 days should be lessons of what we can be if we preserve national unity if we realize the value of the ukrainian state for us

, if we understand that if this state does not exist, there will be bucha. this should be remembered by all who live ukrainian on ukrainian land and who are going to live in it even after it ends . who came to the part, i will answer that during our interactive session, which we will conduct with mykola in september at 5:30 p.m. and now thank you for listening to this analysis of these difficult days and see you next time on this broadcast, dear friends stay with the espresso tv channels, support us, sign the petition in defense of the tv channel, which will be your contribution to ensuring national unity

and the effective functioning of this state, which we all want to build after the end of this terrible, relentless war, all the best, i will make more than one ukrainian film superheroes who bring us closer every day to victory , military and civilians side by side defend our land from invaders, each on their own front ukrainian project superheroes of the history of the invincible the story of the residents of the village of dymer who stole a russian gas truck and pumped gasoline for the needs of the hospital in the first days of the full-scale russian invasion, a resident of the village of dymer in the kyiv region went to the suburbs. to understand the situation, svitlana saw a russian gas truck with a flat tire, the key was in the ignition, so the girl decided to sit down behind the wheel and take the truck to the field, there she called

her neighbor valentin hryshchenko for help, and he drove the truck away and hid it in the bushes. he wanted to set fire to the occupiers' gasoline truck, but after analyzing the situation well, he decided to donate because the local hospital in the city had no electricity from the invaders' cars. and there were many wounded in the hospital. by the way, there was enough gasoline for more than a week. when the kyiv region was liberated, the man handed over the truck to the ukrainian defenders. he is happy that he was able to thus help first the doctors and later the ukrainian military information from the website vaga ukraine.ua every story of ukrainian superheroes is not a legend it is ours from you are true ukrainians, it is very important in this difficult time to be aware of what is happening, we tell the news and