society did not save the state from the final collapse, so that later electoral decisions directed the ukrainian state to correct this false line and to the direction of a new collapse, this can also happen after the war, because war is also a national impulse, of course the best moment in our history was, as it were, that it succeeded to prevent war, but that is also not all in our power. there, war is already war - it is a huge rush of national movement, which naturally decreases with each new day, the continuation of such and such of local hostilities, and this is also understood in russia, they understand that the longer this

war continues, the more the national , economic, and moral potential of ukrainian statehood will be depleted, and they will do everything to ensure that the war does not end as long as russia manages to preserve the possibilities for the continuation of this war. and what potential, well, this is also an important point that needs to be said. we started to discuss again some completely insignificant things from different planes, and when i say that i get from discussions about this not i will now talk about the subject, this discussion takes place not only on social networks, but also on the television screen. i say, you know, the person with whom i could discuss may die tomorrow during military operations.

people who discuss with this person may lose their homes tomorrow. become refugees, leave the country and never come back here, all political discussions have no meaning until we understand who will remain alive and who will remain living in ukraine there is no answer to this question and there will be nothing to discuss for a long time when there is a war that promises to be long, cruel, exhausting and tragic, what is there to discuss when we do not even know what state we will be in, one day the war will end and when we can say to ourselves that it is over, what is victory day, we knew it for sure during the

past victory day is when the army enters the capital of the enemy state, it is obvious that now it is not such a war at all, so i am not talking about the fact that no one declared this war to anyone, only russia it scares me that she can declare a real war against ukraine. although i don't really understand what this will change. we don't even scare russia by declaring war on it. we still hope that we have ended wars. this is the liberation of our territory. i always say that i know that for me, ending wars is complete. territorial integrity of ukraine with the simultaneous accession of ukraine to nato, then i will be able to breathe

a sigh of relief and say, dear compatriots, at least in the coming decades, there will be no war between russia and ukraine. and if russia still decides fight with nato member states well, then ukrainian soldiers will have to die on the front of this great global war of the third world war, but no one will avoid this, we will share the common fate of a continent that can lose millions of its inhabitants in such a war, and let's hope that russia's realization that it will be a nuclear war of extermination keeps it from such a war, although it is impossible to give guarantees, it may not be a nuclear war between russia and ukraine, then it will be part of this struggle, but it is a very small you see the percentage now on the territory of the crime center. nothing is happening and now russia is working on

internal destabilization of nato, this is hunger, hope for migration crises, destabilization of the continent, this is the topic what will russia work on in the coming month, inspired and confident, it is clear, but such political crises are not war you can get out of them, as you understand, i think that for each of my compatriots, the answer to the question of what victory is is their own, and this is also our problem, we need to reach a consensus about understanding victories, otherwise, what for some will be a victory and they will celebrate it, for others it will just be a short break before a new test, and here

again the question arises, and for whom will it be a break, or will they want to live in the same state with those who have already won and do not understand that tomorrow there may be new bombs dropped on them and tomorrow enemy troops will come to their land again, he does not want to give himself an account in this, too, a good question, more questions than answers, 100 days of this conflict, this is also determined by my questions so far, more than an answer, the main thing is that we have an answer to the question of how our armed forces operate, that we can be proud of our armed forces, and i am not surprised by this, because the armed forces are a

part of our people, it is what always gave us the opportunity to stand in the conditions of a weak the state of inefficient state institutions in the conditions of the enemy's struggle with our state institutions and the state as such in the conditions of the creation of numerous informative political provocations of any kind then the will of the ukrainian people to preserve states proved to be much greater than the ability of our enemy to engage in this daily destabilization of ukrainian statehood, which has already been observed for 31 years in a row and will be observed as long as in russia. the forces of modernity will be enough for this. russia, which sees its development program as a vinnist program that

develops extensively with the help of seizing foreign territories this is the moment that i want to talk about and that is why we see that the armed forces are saving us from all those numerous and seemingly irreparable mistakes that were made as two maidans saved us twice from the irreparable mistakes of the voters and the state structure, this is an incredible phenomenon of ukrainian civilization, a phenomenon that the enemy does not take into account because the enemy works in the paradigm of a strong and effective

vertical state that you simply have something built in, built- in armed forces, built-in society, all this exists simply for by the instructions of the tsar, there is a huge difference between the russian and ukrainian political civilizations, but this does not mean that we have nothing to learn from those who are already creating for what year will ukraine be elected? imagine, in relation to our society devoted to the preservation of countries, in relation to our armed forces, which are defending the state and

are already moving into a counterattack . years that will be difficult , of course, economically, politically, socially, we are entering the most difficult period of our recent history, from which you will not get out quickly, but in the future, that is, in the future, which will begin in 20-25 years and when we will be in the european union when we are similar to neighboring countries in terms of potential and level of development, our immediate task after the end of the war is to build such a strong and effective state , the ukrainian voter no longer has the right to relax, to be irresponsible, to not understand the consequences of his actions, because these consequences kill him physically take away the perspective of his children and

even grandchildren, this has already been done so many times in those 30 years, so many times we have seen a blatant demonstration of this thread and irresponsibility which should have destroyed ukraine and did not destroy it only because we have a society and armies that we no longer want to live to this and after the war, these 100 days should be lessons of what we can be if we preserve national unity if we realize the value of the ukrainian state for if we understand that if this state does not exist, there will be bucha. this should be remembered by all who live ukrainian on ukrainian land and who are going to live there even after the war ends , this is what we want to end our today i will answer

some of the questions that came to the conversation during our interactive session, which we will conduct with mykola in september at 5:30 p.m. and now, thank you for listening to this analysis of these difficult days, and until the next meetings on this broadcast, dear friends, stay tuned to the express tv channels, support us, subscribe petition for the protection of the tv channel, which will be your contribution to ensuring national unity and the effective functioning of this state, which we all want to build after the end of this terrible, relentless war, all the best on the fourth of april, the rrt concert illegally turned off the digital air of the ukrainian independent tv channels espresso, the fifth and direct, a petition was registered on the website of the cabinet of ministers of ukraine, which demands that ukrainian tv channels

be returned to the digital air, in order to sign the petition. first, you need to register, it's very simple. go to the website petition came you gov. ua there go to the registration tab and enter all your data, enter your phone number and email, confirm all your data, enter the code that will be sent to your mobile create a password will certify that you are not a robot give consent to the processing of personal data check all your data again and click the register button to complete the registration go to your specified email where the site letter will come click on the link in the letter that will return you to the rehearsals enter the email password enter we return to the main page of the petition site, open the petition for the return to the digital air of ukrainian tv channels espresso-55 from the invaders

, each on his own front, the project ukrainian superheroes, the stories of the invincibles, the history of the inhabitants of the village of dymer, who stole a russian gasoline truck and pumped gasoline for hospital needs in the first days of the full-scale russian invasion, a resident of the village of dymer in kyiv region went to the suburbs. to understand the situation, svitlana saw a russian gasoline truck with a flat tire, the key was in the ignition, so the girl decided to get behind the wheel and take the truck away after the davos forum foreign minister dmytro kuleba wrote on social networks about the narratives of russian propaganda that have been actively are spreading the russian federation in the world through their agents of influence and their sympathizers. the first four is for nothing. ukraine resists because the west will still throw it at us willingly

. negotiate, the journalist of the cnbc channel held the legend and asked dmytro kulib whether the world should pay with the food crisis and the increase in energy prices for the fact that ukraine does not want to cede its territories to russia. in fact, this also what to ask, why don’t you all die so that our prices don’t rise here, the last time there was an absentee discussion between the two patriarchs of global politics, george soros and henrik kissinger, george soros emphasized that the invasion could be the beginning of the third world war and our civilization may not survive it the best and probably the only way to preserve our civilization is to defeat putin as soon as possible, in his opinion, a truce is unattainable and ukraine has a chance to win , henrik and senger, on the contrary, said that the negotiations should begin in the next two months, ukraine

must cede territories in order to satisfy putin and to oppose russia is to create problems for the world well, actually, let's listen to how henrique senger is evaluated in russia, a man who is absolutely authoritative to be a bridge to neutral states, a bridge connecting the west and the east, europe and russia , maybe nato and again, let's go back to december, which seems simple to us and since the second era, and more recently, russia has proposed exactly the same thing, well, the reaction of russian tv to these debates was very stormy and the typical rhetoric is very, very strange, but look at the best day of soros because it is

very revealing that we observe a military display of the lord's sauce of biden's warriors and here er, it falls into the head of the mind in general hoverl gerontocracy we knew the gerontocritic soviet gerontogrady of anecdotes and warming to some degree dangerous for the development of one's own the state, but in general, it is not dangerous for the world. but the gentokrit is of a completely different type, and he is the kind of dying people who, going into peace and asking, will drag the rest of the world with them into the grave. and also the aggressor by biden and we also know the old man is only a pickpocket who is wrong 99 years old now only he himself spoke

месяцев против что гаранта безопасности об етом новыхо было было оборудование, for the sake of justice, kissinger is already 99, and it's a very strange conversation, because uh, i want to ask. well , where is russia being dragged by their rather old president, and well, uh, uh the problem is that the messenger's statements are not a single speech earlier the new york times published an article the war in ukraine is getting more complicated, while america is not ready for the editorial expressed very similar opinions and called to put pressure on ukraine so that our government goes to painful territorial decisions, experts loyal to russia became more active all over the world, the french intelligence research center published an analytical report in which the kremlin's narratives about inexperienced ukrainian soldiers and the professional russian army were partially promoted, the us expert black said in an interview that russia cannot afford lose

due to the threat of nato expansion, the italian general tricarico called on the eu to abandon the crazy idea of ​​winning in ukraine to incline ukraine to capitulation in order not to provoke russia sounded similar in the discussion of the german schiller institute, the former prime minister of japan shinzoat accused volodymyr zelenskyi of starting special operations in ukraine, who allegedly promised russia not to join nato and should have given autonomy to the donetsk luhansk regions so that there would be no need for war now pro-russian forces have become more active, let's talk with yegor chernev, he heads the delegation of the verkhovna rada to the nato parliamentary assembly and for the past few weeks has directly participated in these many international discussions. congratulations, there is grief do you hear me? good morning. please tell me what the appearance of these statements now indicates, why exactly now did such an active attack begin with all these statements about

peacemaking? the entrance that she has in the western world is in order to somehow break the situation, and secondly, it is superimposed on such a decline of this wave of support for ukraine. critical a person's consciousness cannot stay in this state for a very long time, especially if it is not your own country, but countries that are neighboring or across the ocean or far away, so they are trying, they understood very clearly that for the first time weeks and months when support for ukraine is the highest

, no one would i didn't hear these calls now , these calls somehow stood out against the background of the great support for ukraine, so here they are still trying to negotiate such uh-uh such boundaries for themselves, first of all, start the beginning negotiations on their terms, secondly, this suggests that they are still not very successful, and they admit this because of the fact of such negotiations on the battlefield, because we understand that russia invites negotiations only when they are not very good on the military in the military plan . these are the reasons for today. but in principle, you had the opportunity to communicate with american politicians in the near future. what is your impression, uh, widespread? there really is the point of view of kissing sources, or is it still closer to the point of view of soros no no

absolutely, but really, i will be there two days ago, we met with congressmen of the united states from both parties, republicans and democrats, and both sides emphasized that this is an absolutely marginal vision that is not supported in any party, moreover, in none of the palaces the nation is not in the congress, that is, i was assured that there is no person who supported the politics of the united states, who supported such a... such a position of the messenger, moreover, they emphasize that we absolutely understand that first of all you have to win and we will help you in this, but even if you want to sit down at the negotiating table with putin, it is your right, your decision, and no one has the right to impose on you or tell you how to negotiate, on what terms, and so on. well, i want

to talk about the conditions for us to look at one such comment well, in principle, it's not, it's not some kind of marginal person, it's a person who is the deputy chairman of the state duma's defense committee, let's see. there's nothing to think. why did we start a special operation in order to have parts of the rhetoric there? grab it or from ukraine, you don’t need to follow the path of those territories, it’s true that they think like that makes no sense at all and that’s why if you think so what’s possible for us, give us something there and we’ll still o well all of you are satisfied with these territories if you say we won't pretend to be separate, we are like that oh, everything is great no no no let's come up with a little well let's have some minsk-2 over there just to make it something else but let her stay let her stay we pump her with weapons again this is ukraine and we will do it there again

say that in five years we are not interested in interesting processes. we are not as stupid as they can be . we will have completely different goals. and when they will be fulfilled, so say the day of denuclearization, where is the militarization of ukraine? here, otherwise, there will be a military-technical answer to europe, yes, and he began to think, and that’s how it was, and they have it, and it will be, they won’t go there. for example, on internal russian polls, the levada center was now conducting them, is it possible to negotiate now with putin, er, how is that possible, well, roughly speaking, what should be the goals of these

negotiations in general, ot please tell me the goals let’s say the hidden goals or the real goals of russia, which it is trying to achieve this, of course, on the territory, this is the lifting of sanctions, this is the lifting of sanctions, they recognize that the sanctions are already beginning to have a very strong impact on the economy of the russian federation, as it is called . they are awaiting a great transformation. they are awaiting great the hook is actually because today the logistics chains are already broken, today they can no longer buy high-tech goods, they all still sell oil and gas, but this is accepted . it will screw them up and everything will go on and then the russian economy will feel

not very good, to put it mildly, this is the main reason why they are trying to sit down at the negotiating table but sit down at the negotiating table as they say they want to save putin's face, that is, with some territories, so that we make concessions on some territories and say, ok, let's go there, i don't know crimea, we'll forget some other place there, or you will go to the administrative border of donetsk and luhansk but this is nonsense, because if in russia 80% do not support any concessions to the west, then in our country 90% do not support any concessions from russia, especially in the matter of territorial integrity , therefore we have nowhere to look for a compromise, there is nothing on which we can build these negotiations on today, there is no place to find a middle ground so that it would be possible to come to an agreement so that because these

two sides are completely opposite in their essence, well, that's all, foreign weapons are just coming to ukraine, and the more they come , the less opportunity it is very important for russia to hope for some victories at the front, it is very important for them now, as long as they do not run out of offensive zeal, to have time to establish something there, in principle, russian propaganda in the west, especially in the usa, has made so much effort to advance the narrative that military aid in ukraine is spent inefficiently, as if something is being stolen there, there is no record of such things. i know that you have worked with this, and whether you were actually able to repel the attack of this russian

propaganda . the states of the name with partners on e-e will repeat a new one from the very beginning of this war and it and such generatives will advance, the problem is that, unfortunately, such births are picked up by our societies and even in the western media, in particular cnnt that you are talking about, there really was a story about ukraine allegedly using ineffective weapons , allegedly that the weapons that are delivered to ukraine can end up on the black market in a third country. go somewhere , especially since these are state channels, and not some private ones, where you can. well, i don’t know there without documents. is this weapon somehow going to go somewhere? so i really lived my own investigation from the beginning, relatively speaking