so that this number does not change, we will not forget and we will pay back , we are now in warsaw, it is a very beautiful city, but kyiv is more beautiful for me. one day my country was attacked by russia, but we were lucky and we went to poland with my mother. i like poland, but i want to return home water i have a lot of friends in kindergarten i really want to go home and soon i will return i returned i returned i will return i will return i will return i will return i will return i will return ukraine i will return when we defeat the evil christians we will return to our apartment i invite all poles to visit, everything will be ukraine

, we will prevail, we will win, we will win the news together, we are strong, we will rebuild before we launch, we will win that you are not news, together we are strong, my land tells us that it is not time, we decided to wash up to us, we are drawn home, i want to be happy that we are going home our own homes, but we will water a new nest and create a shelter. thank our armed forces. glory

to ukraine, we will live on. think about our country, because our

home is always within us. i was afraid of myself, i felt the need for an instant. i was driving at first. i assessed myself from born scout volodymyr nikolaychuk in the development of his own organization organized the road of life. i chose the moment. i took hundreds of my fellow villagers

unharmed. no news, together we are strong, we will rebuild taras, we will launch, we will win, you are not news, together we are strong, oh, lyuli, lyuli, the hummingbirds flew in and sat on lyoli, they began to think, you are a child the field of cradles was gone, the hummingbirds understood, the little baby was abandoned, the heroes returned home alive with victory, we are fighting to return their childhood to them, our troops are very strong, we are courageous for the future

of our children, the pial project of kateryna osadchoi , find your loved ones, do not lose hope, you will find your loved ones, created a telegram channel, search disappeared 18 000 ukrainians are looking for and finding missing people thanks to our project. today we managed to unite more than one and a half thousand families to find relatives and loved ones. leave a request in our chatbot at by telegram, everyone of you can join the search for the disappeared, together we are strong, we will do everything so that you find your unconquered cities of ukraine zaporizhzhia, the city of

harsh metallurgists, glorious engine builders and a powerful hydroelectric power plant on the dnieper. for centuries, they protected ukrainian lands from invaders during the liberation war, the zaporozhye army fought for independence for the entire country in world war ii, the city had to endure soviet subversion the dnieper and the german occupation and now zaporizhzhia is full of the cossack spirit, as always, it stands indomitably in defense of ukraine zaporizhzhia is unconquered, we will prevail, we will pass on, we will win the news together, we are strong,

congratulations, friends on the air, one plus one, the night watch program, in which we analyze the issues that concern every ukrainian and today we speak about such a legalization of weapons in ukraine, 80% of respondents support the right of everyone to a short barrel in action, this is a timely initiative in the conditions of war and what secret meanings the authorities put into this project, let's analyze with the minister of internal affairs denys knostrskyi, the psychology of war, if not by god's will, you are in the trenches and in the evacuation, what is going on in the minds of military women in the rear and children under fire, are children able to see the horrors of the occupation they have seen in the studio of the night watch, natalya ostrovska yevhen kuksin andrija works for you orlyak and i, yevhen plinskyi, and

today we will talk about a topic that has been the most resonant in our society in recent days, the topic of the legalization of weapons. friends, who have already voted actions. well, i have already voted. i will explain in more detail later, but for now, as a small spoiler for me, the legalization procedure was abbreviated , to put it simply, the gun is absolutely ok if it will work well, according to the headquarters, how to obtain a driver's license, and personally, i have not yet decided and i want to figure it out on today's broadcast together with our speakers, that's for sure for or against and vote. after our live broadcast, on the one hand, if an attacker broke into my apartment, i'll pick up the phone while i call the police, how do you feel with a weapon? more protected but on the other hand, the impulsiveness of our people is very difficult to predict. i apologize a little . and why are you talking about this right now? this is a good question and no less. i wonder why the issue of legalization

of weapons has now become the subject of a survey at the level of the authorities, but i have my own version that's why it's happening right now, but i think that in the future we'll try to figure it out, but before we start discussing, friends, i propose it to specific figures, they will best illustrate the mood of society, and from such a not fresher, it's better to start this vote of ukrainians on the deputy action regarding whether or not to legalize the short barrel, i will look at the results at noon on may 31. and what happened at that time is their position . more than 1 million or 100,000 ukrainians have already expressed their opinion, of which 19% are in favor short barrel, but for special needs and what are these special needs, i think it will be necessary to clarify, well, it is a big mystery, so few people understand that in fact these details are in the hands of the minister, and then a little more numbers - this is important: 59% for a short barrel for

personal protection and only 22% against, but now for the comparison is the data of the survey of the group, the rating in february 2021 and look at the right of a private individual to own a firearm, only 23% supported it against 75 , that is, a year ago. the data were the opposite, and on the contrary , almost 80% did not support it. everything has changed in a year. 80% will support it, but it seems that all of us we understand that they changed, the changes happened not in a year but in the last 3 months, yes, the war showed that everyone wants to be able to defend themselves, the occupation in irpen says it's a pity that i didn't have weapons to defeat at least one occupier, you know how they say well, here are my thoughts there are those. and i conducted a survey on my instagram page and unexpectedly. when the results came out, 531 people voted for the legalization of weapons and 428

against, and the discussion on the social network just got heated and let's hear what arguments the users of the social network gave. i don't want to have a gun, but a crazy neighbor can have one and it’s scary, especially in small towns where men chop their wives with an ax, or vice versa. on the 23rd, i wrote that i was against, but after bucha irpen and other terrible news, i’m in favor and once again why are they really needed training courses are needed so that everything is at the legal level. the country. but my children are not enough. somewhere , you will look at someone the wrong way in their opinion, and they will catch a bullet in the head. friends from all over america say terrible things, just like in school. children shoot and pensioners wheels shoot at each other if you park in her place, you are a fool. i am against it, although at the beginning of the war i was in favor, but it is good to

think and see what is happening in the usa. i think this is not an option, and the only condition is that the certificates required for the purchase of weapons are not sold to anyone at any time i think better of the occupiers. let there be weapons at home, friends. i think that everyone has noticed that debates have unfolded around this topic, not only in social networks, even in our newsroom the day before yesterday, when we discussed this topic with colleagues, everyone literally split into two camps. categorically for someone categorically against everyone has their own arguments but it seems to me that these discussions are taking place around an issue that is actually not in the center of the corner that they are now trying to solve with this bill and this initiative by asking, therefore, i think that here it is necessary to turn to the first source and talk to the minister of internal affairs, denys of the monastery

, i hope that he will help to understand this. and what, in fact, what was the meaning of the authorities when they started to initiate this and right now? good evening, mr. denys, good evening thank you very much for joining our broadcast at such a time to our night watch. and here you are right away. you know such a first question, but it would have been asked on february 23. the parliament voted in the first reading the draft law 5708 about the right on civilian firearms, 274 deputies supported this draft law, and in fact, he was ready for it to be voted on in the second reading, the law will be adopted and everything will be fine, but suddenly this poll appears in action and this topic begins to resonate again in society and begin to discuss it, and well, the logical question is why was this survey initiated in action and what results

did you expect from it? it is extremely hot and there is always a lot of discussion around it. even if we are talking about the survey in action, which, by the way , is still ongoing, and i invite citizens to participate in this survey, it set a record for the number of people who voted at all . through this survey tool in action today, more than 1 million 680,000 citizens actively expressed their opinion, i think that this is not the end yet, and i think that more than 2 million surveys will cross and we will hear the opinion of people for this period the day when the law was adopted in the first reading, you called it correctly. it was the day before the war, and in fact today we understand that you and i have been living for 90 days in a different reality, a reality

that needs to be studied, that needs to be understood, if , for example, a year ago, i remember very well according to a survey conducted by sociological services, they showed that ukrainian society as a whole is against e and does not support the idea of ​​owning short-barreled firearms, in particular pistols, today, during the war when we have tens of thousands of weapons distributed, which today are trophy weapons, we see weapons on the street today and we understand with you that we have to live with this for quite a long time, years, when we must clearly remove the culture of owning weapons, we must change our approaches before training in the use of weapons, we should bring out the number of shooting ranges in the countries, because the motto proclaimed by this dwarf putin, yes, the demilitarization of ukraine

is obvious to me, the answer should be just the opposite, the militarization of ukraine is the answer and with the correct answer to the question what should we do with the future, and what should militarization be, it is undeniable that it should be transponded - transported precisely into the culture of owning weapons, and we are dividing here, we are now talking about the biggest debatable issue, but there is no debate that during the independence of ukraine, it should finally be and turn off the law on the circulation of civilian weapons because it did not exist all these 30 years, in fact, which we have independent ukraine, it is still regulated by the order of the ministry of internal affairs and, of course, i i am absolutely convinced of this belief, and the interview with mandari today that it is time to translate this into the framework of zakorkh. we have a huge number of unsettled questions, not only those that were asked to us on february 24, 2022, but those that were earlier, these

are issues of circulation, uh, that means sports weapons, award weapons and other weapons that are hundreds of thousands of dollars that are in the hands of today's citizens, the very first days of armed aggression showed that we issued tens of thousands of weapons to large cities and this well, i think that without exaggeration, it can be said that it played a key role in the fact that we did not let the enemy in. the big cities gave a worthy repulse, and in fact, which is now continuing in the most acute positions. at the same time, i believe that it will also be quite far and safe. therefore, now we are starting this new discussion about the new reality that we live with you today, it must be studied in particular and through action, and you asked what do i expect, of course i i expect a new section of the new ukrainian society

in the answer to this not a simple question and the answer today is, in principle, completely different than a year ago because a year ago and society was leaning towards the fact that it is impossible to own a weapon even at home to protect one's own home, today society expresses itself in a different way, i.e. in fact, we are talking about an active group of people who voted for this today, about 2 million, and most of them say that they are in favor of ukrainian citizens owning short-barreled weapons, including with pistols and could use them to protect homes. you just said about the militarization of society. did you remember how weapons were distributed on the streets in the first days of the war ? an approximate figure and does this bill somehow solve the problem of illegal

weapons in the hands of ukrainians, illegal weapons are a long-standing problem, in fact, we all understand that the war in ukraine has been going on since 2014 and that number of weapons that have appeared on it is measured today by hundreds of thousands of illegal illegal weapons that are not registered, in fact, in order for weapons to become legal, this is precisely this law in order to be able to implement them as much as possible, but in addition, one of the new issues that are still did not delay this law because it was voted in the first reading before the start of the large-scale armed aggression of the russian federation, the issue of legalizing trophy weapons, in fact, today there is a very large number of automatic weapons that have left slides on our land today is also an illegal weapon, they become registered become registered somewhere people

just use it for now because of the disarmament of the age or the aggressor, but in the future we will discuss the options, in particular if the person wants to keep it for himself and one of the options is to register it put it again means the possibility of introducing only single fire, that is, not automatically single fire, that is, in this way, this machine gun becomes a carbine and is usually legalized and given to a person to use if he responds to all to criteria a-a, but this is also a normal way to actually legalize the large number of trophy weapons that are on hand today regarding the draft law on the legalization of weapons. to change radically, in particular, if the documents in the first reading are to be believed, the draft law says that weapons are legalized, you can keep them at home

, but now starting from statements to top politicians yes we hear about barely complete legalization, starting with the fact that it may be possible to carry it even on the street, well, at least that's how they make it clear, and from this, perhaps the most logical question is how do you see that in the new realities, in the new conditions, this legalization of weapons will be, well, first of all, we we all have to understand that it is not the same as the first and second readings or between them, yes, between them, today we have a chasm , in my opinion, a historical, social, civilizational chasm lasting almost 100 days, and the first one, which is called a large-scale war, is a reassessment of many things, yes how do ukrainians generally feel about weapons ? how far can we take weapons for the eternity of the aggressor and my answer: yes, we can, we are worthy of

owning weapons. to forget that every person has the right and is guaranteed the right to safety for his own safety , including from the person who can have this weapon opposite you, that is why i support the position on the possibility of owning and storing weapons at home for protection own homes, but against the stage of the free seed, it is carried out on the streets, the position also looks the most logical because well, in principle, in kyiv on the roads that arise personally, there was such a conflict there two years ago, i took my children to school and on the road i did not share anything with another by car well, he opened the nearby window and just pointed a gun at me and uh, well, analyzing it later , uh, i thought, well, if i had a gun, well, i would have pulled it out and started shooting. well, because i have

two children in the car, yes and so i'm just fine turned into a statue and froze and simply did not understand what i should do, yes, the driver's level of adequacy worked, he did not shoot, he did not shoot, yes, but the story ended with nothing, yes , i wrote a statement there, but there is another story. well, and millions, and everyone understands that in any case a person will grab a gun and use it, believing that there is now a threat to his life, because ukrainians have grown a lot in their consciousness in the last months , during the months of the war, but... it's just for the sake of it walking down the street with a gun. i think that this is true. for now, for the sake of it, we have to pass. i want to clarify in p. denys, actually, mr. denys. we promised at the beginning to ask you what a short barrel for special needs means, so there is such a question in action, how to understand this wording. well, there

there is a decryption, in fact, we are talking about the possibility of buying and storing a pistol at home for your use only for the protection of the home itself, the rest of the weapons we already own and have the right to carry only law enforcement officers and military personnel who perform their own duties, this actually means for special needs, i.e. special needs of law enforcement and military personnel, as well as for storing weapons for the protection of owners. came the main one and ah-ah but about him and many are not theses against expressed in particular by representatives of the association of gun owners, they have many arguments, often they absolutely

understood, i will not list all of them, but one of which is often actually explained by the representatives of the association of gun owners as an argument is that the draft law that has already been adopted in the first reading will enable the ministry of internal affairs and the so-called monopoly in relation to the registration of this whole permit system because of the fact that you can answer such statements, well , in fact, there are very often such claims against the ministry of internal affairs that the ministry of internal affairs has monopolized this story, and indeed in recent years, there have always been problems with corruption with prize weapons mr. denys, you also solved these issues by depriving people, that is, the issue of monopoly is what andrii says is all the fear of whether it will not create some kind of corruption component . there is always abuse. let's be honest . - what kind of corruption abuse is helped by only one order, the order

is defined not in the statutory hidden action, which is known by a separate number of people, but in a clear order defined by law or in the register of arms circulation, which will be clear and which can be checked to the competent authorities, for example, the security service of ukraine or the state bureau of investigation, and in which it will be clearly and openly recorded who has the right to a weapon and who should possess it, by the way, this is very necessary, because in fact the register of hunters was important for us in the first days of the war, we raised it and also appealed to the hunters so that they would help in case of armed aggression, do you remember that in fact tens of hundreds of such young and not so young people with weapons and hunting weapons gathered near kyiv in the kyiv region who also took an active role in armed aggression and many subversive groups were eliminated. thanks to them and others. therefore, this is the first clear procedure

defined in the law. there would be a single register that would be kept by the administrator and would be the ministry of internal affairs, but all law enforcement agencies would have access to it. in order to check and determine the interaction so that we can understand how we move forward with regard to the state of mental health in ukraine, anyone can get one today, even the mentally ill a person here, obtaining certificates is also a separate story, you can also buy them there, order how to solve this issue, well, it can also be changed, we uh-uh, we absolutely understand it, and what today is not only access to weapons, yes, but also access to military service, access to certain professions that are important today and that make an extremely responsible decision, therefore, of course, we

understand that a lot must change after the end of this terrible war, and in particular the ministry of health before the war took a number of initiatives so that these certificates could be the most objective and could be obtained only when a person really meets the criteria that are defined, we hope that we in the editorial office before the broadcast of e-e tried to find an answer to how the legalization of e-e weapons can to help solve the issue of illegal weapons with the same trophy that you mentioned, we came up with such a model, or did you think about such an option that, for example, people who have illegal weapons in their hands after the war well, they obtained at the front yes, for example, the trophy, they can there, for example, turn to the ministry of internal affairs to hand in this trophy weapon and receive a completely legal short barrel for it , and so on. in this way, we will create a mechanism for the

collection of illegal weapons and in fact, yes, we will settle this issue, there is such a version, she has the right on the existence of well, well, they also discussed many different options, uh, one of which i mentioned during our conversation with you today is in the case when a person, after all, having acquired a trophy weapon in battle or having found it, wants to keep it for herself so that she can convert it to a single fire and legally register it to keep it as a carbine and from whether she can get it, for example, black it on after if she is not allowed, as it was provided for in the first edition of this bill, it was like this of course, we will not have such an opportunity. the last question is, when is the second reading of this draft law

and when is it possible to enter into force, well, this is not a question for me, it is a question for our parliamentarians, who are actively working on in the revision of this law to the second reading, there are many such a large number of rules