the limit of what is permissible. now, the limit of what is permissible . they have reached such a state that such people as cranes can safely talk on federal television about the advantage of nuclear war, of course. pure and insane. topic a-a this is a story on a plane after, if you look at what dmitry medvedev does, the former president of russia, he was such a liberal in our country, yes. talks about severe sanctions eh in the fight against the enemies about the death penalty that we need they all ask how do we know how to feel the limit of what is permissible and how is it possible now that putin will like it as our main not the viewer as the main consumer one of the main consumers this propaganda will make cranes like this the image of a statement can always be there, but for the russian authorities, he is a little

over the edge, but they value him for something, but, well, apart from zhuravlev's message about uh, i would probably nuclear the war is heard from solovyov, from skabeev, from other russian propagandists, and from the kremlin, who , well, almost at the same time, they begin to raise this topic, promote it, then beat about it. then they raise it again. what is this information field, the reaction of the west , the reaction of the russians ? well, i agree with you, and besides the crazy crane, there are also people who , oh, crazy, have made their professions and will probably start here with vladimir putin, oh, it seems to me that one of the reasons why russian propaganda как етиме обрасвается обочнее конфонечно мне i ​​am driven by the very context of our conversation, i would never have thought that you know, we were in the same country. yes, i will talk with

kiev, with one of my favorite cities, about the nuclear war that these guys from the russian federation want there, in their dreams, they will unleash eh against the background of one war that is being fought eh. i think that this is part of the propaganda directed at putin too, and they know that putin likes this propaganda, putin knows that if you look at it i recommend it, of course, but if you look at how putin told how he last year, for example, did his message to the russians, this is his big press conference, a terrible genre . he had to talk about the economy. he spoke with great sadness and reluctance. he had to talk about more. we will give there 10,000 rubles of peace, but when he talked about missiles, about nuclear weapons, and about what kind of weapons we have, yes, in general, this brought him obvious pleasure academician sakharov, who understood that he had prepared a hydrogen bomb for the soviet union, eh, and it

was natural to try the starter, we are a great humanist, but a man who thought a lot about the consequences of technological progress, so here is putin, eh, for centuries academician sakharov sent a congratulatory telegram, eh in which it was said that he was very grateful to sugar for the fact that he made such a wonderful bomb . the monster of the nobel prize, the world is just curious about mr. putin, so he was wounded there a few years ago, in an interview he said that he does not watch tv or talk shows at all, but even based on this information, what do you think he might be like? well, how can it be? he is the author, of course, i don’t think that putin is the author of the script. i think that they have someone there.

then it all comes back in the form of propaganda so that to make it pleasant for him, even if he assumes that the number one tv viewer still receives some analytical reports about the mood in the press, that is , he turns out to be referees, some celebrities from well, here are the key discussions overseen in the newspapers - this is standard, it seems, what - that's practice and that's it, that's it, that's a snake, she constantly bites her knees or by the tail, if a friend constantly eats himself, when you say that this is testing of the russian a-a part of the opinion than blackmail in relation to everything peace is also fair in general. it seems to me that the only situation that is produced in the foreign political arena now is different forms of blackmail if there is a nuclear war and there is a nuclear war today. sold to us as a crisis agent and they are talking about these sanctions, we will issue a towel there in africa, uh, this is a

form of blackmail, mr. kyrylo we started our broadcast with the thesis that ukraine is alone and hear the native word and went to protect ukraine together, they aim in fragile and expensive."

a big component of this victory is your love for us, a strong front and a strong pressure on our women , for our children, for our cities, for our states in ukraine, we remember, we are winning for the people of mozkovite, the name k2 has become a nightmare, especially they are frightened by the commander of the unit kyrylo veres you believe in

victory i know the second option since the 14th year.

and we so, when we talked about the topic of tatarstan, i remembered that there was always a separate delegation of russia and there was a separate delegation of tatarstan where the children themselves declared i apologize to me russia we tatarstan is at this moment, you know, in the geopolitical moment today, as far as the country identifies itself, so we are the republic of tatarstan, well, this is actually very illustrative, because if you give a little concise history, you know, after the collapse of sovka, tatarstan even tried to become such

an independent state, by the way, that's why the 90 at the address of independence, tatarstan even declared this, i quote, take as much sovereignty as you can swallow, well, it was like that then, de facto de jure , er, well, putin swallowed it in tatarstan right there, and that and their imperial desire. they are still called a sovereign republic, and even before 2,000 in 2010, they had such a position in this sovereign republic . - this is putin, and he now has a very radical method of erasing such a nation as

tatarstan from the face of the earth. tatarstan participated in our war. it seems to me that parents, mothers, sisters, wives cannot fail to realize this there. 60 now i will say 64 dead occupiers from tatarstan. it seems to me that tatarstan actually understands this very well, and it is known that there were certain protests against the fact that to take part in the war in ukraine and about the details of this, i suggest not to talk to the human rights activist eliza nisanbekova. kalmyks, and we are interested in what is happening now in tatarstan, because well, what we came up with was your inclusion of the fact that tatarstan is, uh, well

, the republic in the state. yes, what is happening in tatarstan during these 100 days of war ? uh, since the first day, uh, it was announced that putin appointed the invasion of ukraine, how he declared war, and on that day, people began to go out on a mass protest. after that, of course, uh, this was all suppressed by a police officer. and now, this is more skátyvaet s takoy er-er underground protest er-er they knit green ribbons, they stick er leaflets, and they sign various letters, they send out and all this , of course, they try to suffocate, that is, for example , if a student asks you to deport you, if you work there, they ask you for something different to fire you,

or they don’t extend the contract, for example, we already have one the teacher who sent his college a letter in which the war would end the war in ukraine and the university reneged on the contract with him, and we have a lot of such cases. unfortunately , mass exodus no longer occur, but that's all it's also partisan, some kind of actions are held, for example, if you may have heard that they changed the wholes in shopping centers, eh, a similar situation was from st. petersburg, there they opened a criminal case against a girl for the fact that she underestimated me, we have this occupation we have raised the administrative issue, what will happen next, so far it is less clear. this is how your ordinary life has changed. we just know that we were carrying out one package of sanctions .

that is, in ordinary life, the war in ukraine and the fact that russia invaded ukraine. even the life and we all feel it, but the life of ordinary people, yes, that is, the majority, what do we call them, how do they feel the consequences of sanctions, participation in inna, what is the opinion of the majority, do you know any sociological questions? about the owner, some kind of structure is official. but if you believe the different things that they publish periodically, then of course, according to them, more than a hundred people support this

war. invasion of ukraine, but in my opinion it's not representative and uh, well, simply, damn, the specification we have, any voting in russia, is a specification , they won't be surprised because, uh, the sociological ones just specify in the same way, and in my opinion, here i am, according to my environment, according to mike's parents on окреснию er-er, there are friends, roughly speaking, but i have n't met a single person, that's why i was in favor, we mentioned about 64 er-er dead residents of tatarstan who took part in the war in ukraine against ukraine , so first of all, in your opinion, is it really like that the so -called official statistics are valid, are the number of dead actually much higher, the first and the second, in fact, what do you think is the fact that the residents of tatarstan are dying, or

can it somehow have a more radical effect on the protest mood in the republic? at the beginning of its existence, against the background of the war, they talk about it unfortunately, it is less because the country was physically squeezed out by the majority of activists who spoke specifically for independence, tatarism, which they call