blocking the participation of the opposition in the political process , particularly in the international arena, well, these are still alarm bells that are extremely inappropriate for ukraine right now and are actually hitting us at the most inopportune moment, mr. yaroslav, what do you think about this and is there still is austria's statement really such a negative signal, or do you think we will receive a positive opinion from the european commission and simply, well, in a moment we will become a candidate for eu membership, because the substitute for this full-fledged form, but in fact, we say it is unsatisfactory today about the economy, yes, this substitute does not contain economic incentives, well, let's say frankly that any decision now regarding, for example, such a candidate in ukraine, where it is exclusively a political decision of the european court, that is , i do not need to consider it according to any dimensions regarding the criteria it will depend exclusively from the

political situation in the european union itself, the attitudes of the citizens of the european union that we see now, except for hungary for sure, are also psychologically and according to these balls, they support ukraine supports the provision of asus and this will be a political fork in the heads of the european union countries and they will have to choose because right now we need to try to come up with a third option, this is actually an attempt to look good in front of our faces. no, this will be a betrayal of us. i believe that ukraine has definitely done a lot more to show the european society among many, many countries of the european union, especially such as vegetables , so in this case, i think we need to put pressure on the situation in order to give us candidates for countries like austria, well, it is not very

favorable for us here, and there are other countries that are not such as the czech republic, poland, slovakia, other countries that are quite active and supportive, there is a high level of activity of the ukrainian diaspora of the historical i think that there are, according to this survey, significantly larger countries that have always remained and how in the european, in particular, in this case, we are talking about the dances of ukraine, germany, this is the largest economy of the european union now, and it sounds natural that a lot depends on them, so once again our task now is not to give up the pace, not to move on . there is no need to be

for ukraine, but only from a political point of view, they not only received a candidate, but also received a member of the eu, so in this case, i believe that ukrainians serve us this right and give any relaxations in this matter for the european well, it will be wrong for the union. it's a shame that she didn't have time to go to the head of the czech republic and it costs a lot to complete. they support us much more. but there's nothing wrong with that situation at the end of june . we are still ready to be a full-fledged member of the european family and to take certain steps right now to include tv channels in the digital air, to accept the much-much-suffering istanbul convention, to complete the competition for the meeting of the anti-corruption prosecutor, these are all the things that should be done in parallel, mr. yaroslav and svitlana. i really appreciate your

patriotism and your desire, which we very much share, for ukraine to receive their candidacy. probably more important, i already said it, more important than after the victory over russia, there is no task now, but i'm sorry, i have to remind you that bulgaria, for example, is currently in 48th place in the rating of economic freedom, and they believe that this is not super good, the result is one of the worst, let's say, of the results in the european union, but where was ukraine before the war ukraine was 130 places lower than belarus, even and even worsened its indicators in the last couple of years, well, that is, too. well, when we say that everything is great with us, we are better than bulgaria or, for example, romania, people, please go to romania, if you have such an opportunity, do it after the war at least just compare just live a little there compare talk with

people look at how the institutions work you will see what there is well just a difference there is a huge difference nevertheless it is clear what is there andriy but yes it should be noted that we are talking about countries that have been members of the european union for more than 10 years, and it is not even necessary for bulgaria to be a member of the european union, and it is precisely in our desire to become a member of the european union that the corners and the things you are talking about are er, well , they compared the directive on the one hand and the situation with european funds on the other hand. it is happening now. i will honestly tell you that for me the european directive is even now a great moment, but some of our officials are so wrapped up in a tube i'm beaten, i'm driving, look, how do you want to be in europe, that's what we accept. they should be conducted. that 's how the european period works, that's why in bulgaria

, not 50, there are a lot of problems. there are best practices for them, but in ukraine, somehow, we open up this market, and we give money, and if they go, their countries go astray from this path , like hungary, too. well, the impact on the economic plan is starting to be better than the prices, too . true, but there are other problems, then you fall out of this funding, although not even to the end. we need a european period , so let's talk about the good, and the european union officially canceled the other day all taxes and duties on ukrainian exports that are sent to the european market to help recovery of ukrainian business that suffered as a result of russian aggression, the spokeswoman for the european commission on agriculture and trade, let's measure it, gorsia ferrer said at a briefing in brussels, and let's listen to svitlana taran, ms. svitlana, what do you think about this matter ? and how important and stimulating it is for us.

thank you . we compare not with the members, that is, with ukraine, but with the candidate countries and potential candidates, what eh, well, now some countries, like austria, offers for ukraine, that is, then eh, the situation for ukraine looks a little better. our strategic the largest partner of ukraine, which occupies about 39%. our e-e in our foreign trade e-e granted ukraine from june 4, that is, a number of trade preferences have already begun to operate e-e all year e-e they include the following four main

measures, the first is the cancellation of all customs duties and tariff quotas on all agricultural and agro-food products from ukraine. that is, all 30 that were in effect before the war are canceled and can be exported without any restrictions. the second thing that has been canceled is the system of input prices for agricultural products. this is what they are. are applied to only certain goods such as tomatoes, bitter apples, pears are canceled . they are canceled and the last one is the cancellation of all anti-dumping duties and protective measures on

ukrainian metal products, this is an important measure and support for our e-e sector of metallurgy e-e and accordingly according to our estimates e-e for example e-e ot tariff quotas are the biggest the biggest effect will be from the cancellation of tariff quotas and from the cancellation of anti-dumping and protective measures regarding ukrainian steel yes and tariff quotas in particular concerned about 15% of our exports from ukraine to the eu and now he will enjoy full customs-free access there, and also anti-dumping duties and protective measures also applied to about 15% of our exports to the eu to ukraine and from ukraine and according to the calculations of the

european commission, they counted what is the removal of these measures will allow ukrainian exporters to save money when exporting to the eu, the tariff for the tariff code is 31 million euros for anti-dumping measures. it is about 35 million euros, but the estimates are because they are calculated from the point of view of the volume of supplies , which was last year now, of course , the situation has changed a lot, yes, for our exports, and here it is important not only to reduce customs barriers to the eu, but also other barriers that have appeared in our trade today, these are actually transport logistics restrictions. there by the blockade of the apartment and also other restrictions

related to the military actions in ukraine, but all the same this market is a measure of such significant support from the european union and we hope that this measure is temporary. yes , but what will be held during this year, negotiations with the eu to make this liberalization of trade longer lasting, i.e. drinking. this is a systemic decision. thank you , ms. svitlana, mr. yaroslav. your comment is short, up to a minute. please, what do you think about this decision, how important is it, stimulating, and yours? opinion - in a word, the fate of the european union, even last year e-e portula is the largest responsible for interest, now it is for the reasons for the blocking of ports and in other hostile countries, the only way is for

our exports and the abolition of customs duties and tariffs was the best thing that could be done for our economy therefore, i am very grateful, i wish that the calls will continue, we should become part of the european type, despite the fact that we were actively moving towards that, but choose these wash soap codes for that one of the best songs thank you thank you mr. yaroslav yaroslav zheleznyak people's deputy of ukraine svitlana taran international trade analytics center of the kyiv school of economics were in touch with us and you know andria, i listened to ms. svitlana ms. svitlana said that it is necessary to divide the candidate into eu members and directly eu members so we must note that there is still a third type - it is a candidate for candidates. and these are the potential candidates, yes, such are kosovo, for example , the existence of which is not recognized by several eu states,

or, for example, bosnia and herzegovina, where a strange the management system is called the so-called non-binding so-called dighton agreement in 1995 on ending the war in the balkans, and this system, according to experts, does not work, and actually if the eu decides to equate ukraine with them, it will be unacceptable , but it is not up to us to decide, but we can influence this without actually demonstrating such decisions as the dismissal of the ombudsman in violation of the constitution and legislation or, for example , the disconnection of broadcasters from the digital airwaves, it is important how to say if speaking in the british language intelligence, don't lose operational momentum here and don't lose er connection with reality, too, because the reality is that ukraine continues to lose every day a lot of defenders er ukraine

continues to fight desperately for its independence and we still have to win in fact probably which is very, very far, and this means that the economy should work and there will be no doubts from our allies that we are also part of the free western liberal world. for the ukrainians in the future of ukraine, this will immediately affect everything from topics. for example, i read that the germans, spiegel writes that one of the reasons why the germans, for example, do not want to support such an unspoken tank invar, they want to supply the leopards with their best tanks in the world. this includes personal distrust, for example, to mr. zelenskyi may also have a question about certain rhetoric of the ukrainian government, it works well for the domestic market, conditionally speaking, it works well for the foreign electorate, maybe the germans will forgive anyway, no, they don’t elect conditionally in any case, it will be a decision that will be made by the

authorities, the elites will make the elites, one must also be able to speak, this is also an important point, whether it is intentional, whether it contains components, this is his position, but it is very influential, as we all understand, that is, certain other media, such as for example the new york times they warn the world against giving weapons to ukraine, but a number of international experts and journalists said, well , kamon, the york times well, please don't sing along to russian propaganda. lawyer, state representative of the antimonopoly and monopoly committee of ukraine from 2015-19, congratulations ms. aggy, vitaya and leonid kosyanchuk, an expert

on the oil products market of ukraine, congratulations, mr. leonida. part of the oil embargo and let's start with ms. paniga from zagreb, can you explain the procedure, how it will work, what are the potential losses for the russian economy and if there will be delays can this be considered a full-fledged embargo, if you allow me? i will literally also add a question from myself that was actually formulated by the editor of the garden uh mr. eliot how did it happen that, in principle, the stronger the embargo sanctions become , the more russia actually earns from the price of auto products, that is, they have the opposite effect to a certain extent. do you not think that is how to deal with this problem in principle? we already know that

it concerns 92% of all the oil consumed by the european union, and if according to the documents a-a and the oil that is transported by sea is 2/3 of the oil, that is, one third is the oil that is transported by the oil pipelines, the oil will have to go to poland and germany, they voluntarily said that we will undertake the obligation to fulfill these sanctions, and accordingly there are 7-8 %, which fall mostly on hungary and these two countries , that is, in principle we can say with you that this is a victory in terms of oil sanctions, because 92%. it's really a lot more, let's remember what we said about the fact that the oil embargo is complete most likely it won't be. that it could be bills from the circle, i.e. oil for food exchange. something like the iranian program or that it could be some kind of restrictive duties on oil so that part of the funds that russia earns would settle in the

european economy and then be directed to aid ukraine, but the european union went to essentially the most severe form in this part of a complete ban on the consumption of the purchase of oil, respectively , here we have such a result with hungary and with the countries if we talk about the transition period to at the end of the year, although in fact only the united states is among the countries that introduced an oil embargo, and this embargo began to operate because they themselves are an oil-producing country and they even export oil. if we take the same great britain, despite the fact that great britain only of russian oil consumed even the oil barge that great britain was a few months ago, it has a transition period until the end of the year. that is, it is an absolutely normal transition period and it is impossible to this is precisely related to what you mentioned to andriy

about the vzygardian article why because the less oil resources appear on the market and we understand that oil is a commodity that is not available more than we consume it because there is an opec cartel opec plus which ensures that there is exactly enough oil on the market to meet the level of consumption, that its price does not fall below a certain level, and that's just the way it is. to earn here and there. on the contrary, i would like to say that i do not see betrayal in this part today either, because if we go back to march of this year, when the talks about the oil embargo just started, then oil on the market jumped to a price higher than today by about $10 . that is, now the barva oil was voted and you and i did not see a significant increase in the price due to

the fact that on the one hand the united states and the international energy agency, members of it, they released significant volumes of oil from the reserve and continue to release the second such a victorious decision every month. the opec plus cartel raised its production forecasts for the next two months by 50%, and i remind you that neither saudi arabia nor the united arab emirates agreed to do it since february. and now they accidentally did it this is a victory for energy diplomacy, and in the next few days, the delegation of saudi arabia is to arrive in washington, and one after another, and in july we already talked about the fact that we are waiting for a visa and visa to the prince of saudi arabia that is, it also gives us hope that in the future the volume of production will increase, plus you and i know that talks have already begun between the criteria of opec plus regarding the possible deprivation of

russia's right to vote there because its oil production is expected to drop by 19% plus after all, you and i know that the price has not risen, despite the fact that iran seized two greek oil tankers, that greece arrested one russian oil tanker , and that, in fact, today, iranian vessels do not actually go the gulf because the insurers are afraid to insure them because of that trans promised that they would attack, that is, despite all these events, the price of oil still did not rise, therefore, in principle, the way the allies calibrate the sanctions is positive, unfortunately, we would like it all to happen at once, but here you have to be patient and wait, let's listen to mr. leonid, mr. leonid, to what extent do you think the economic impact will be felt as a result of the oil embargo on the russian federation and what ms. agia spoke about

in fact, the victory of diplomacy in the decision of the opec countries plus uh, how much will this decision to increase oil production be effective, how will it affect the situation and the world oil market? well, as people, god has really made a political decision so far, they sent him 6 packages. he was born quite difficult, we know that eh for more than a month, such figures as orban, the head of hungary, blocked this initiative. well , the fact is that hungary depends on russian oil for 65%, the czech republic for 50%, slovakia for 100%, and well, if you could do something and understand why so happened because, well, such political figures

think about their rating for the first time, and their rating does not depend, as in ukraine, for example, on the number of appearances on television, but still on the well-being of their own people, and they understand that without access to sea ​​supplies, they depend on oil supplies through the pipe, uh, and this and this is exactly the golden oil pipeline of friendship, which, by the way , is on our territory, and well, i said the political decision is that well, in fact, these sanctions have not yet started to take effect, and they are so-so, you know partial sanctions at the expense of the fact that initially they wanted to limit russia's export of all oil in general, and in fact to the point that they left the pipeline for hungary, the czech republic, slovakia and germany in part and

well, you know, you also have to look at eh that some countries under eh were forced to support sanctions and some uh if the supply of russian energy carriers because this war if it exposed what is really also what our diplomats talked about that russia uses energy carriers as uh as a tool of pressure on some political uh things in europe well, we know that some leaders, ex-leaders of the governments of european countries were even members of the supervisory board, and the leadership there was headed by the supervisory board of energy companies of russia, well, you know, this is

political corruption, in fact, well, as for hungary, we should be aware of the fact that hungarians has never been loyal to ukraine and there have never been any friendly years from it to date. well, they really excluded friendship from these sanctions, the sanctions are not yet applied, there must be a certain period of time, which for each is political the decision so far regarding the losses, yes, well, if it does not bring anything good to russia, it is not critical for russia, because according to the estimates of international experts , it is russia in one way or another due to the increase in the price of oil, which we already heard about in this program about an increase in supplies in the form of china, uh, it can earn somewhere over 180

billion dollars this year, even with these sanctions. and if you also add uh, revenues from gas exports, international experts estimate it to be somewhere at the level of 260-3 billion dollars you know exactly what they say in odesa, while a fat man who lost weight walked around, he could die. well , there is nothing to be particularly happy about here, you know , and we must understand that we have a war, uh, europe supports us, but everyone thinks about their own well- being, and that's why we should hope for what yatsenyuk once said that europe owes us , no one owes us anything there. europe plus is simply afraid that this flame from the war in ukraine will spread to europe itself. a little bit of such a ray of skepticism went on to drop us. there are less than

four minutes left, but i have a very important question that taking advantage of the fact that mrs. agia is here with us. look, it is not simple. the question is that. let's say that we had a main political agenda, at least epr, a component before the war. this is why we are fighting the oligarchs lately. somehow, i do n't hear much about her, and it is clear that poole is the main informational today it is supported by these oligarchs who are around the president. the main question i have today is whether our ukrainian raw material oligarch is profitable for ukraine to join the european union. it seems to me that today the key question is, in principle, in order to to understand what will happen immediately after the war and even during this war in the matter of the economy mr. let's start very briefly, you have one and a half minutes, thank you, and i will try to say maybe a new opinion, we have never talked about this before and it is really pressing right now

it seems to me that we cannot look at all oligarchs in the same way today, because we have a part of oligarchs who today are interested in joining the european union because for them russia is a very foreign ukraine and they understand that after after this war, their lives and business will be simply impossible if ukraine does not take seven-mile steps towards the west. by the fbi itself, that is, if dmytro firtash, if ihor kolomoiskyi, they are under investigation in the united states and in the west, and for a step, the movement of ukraine in the direction of the west is actually a movement to prison. let's

be frank, the same viktor pinchuk and rinat akhmetov, they are enough people who are perceived correctly in the west. it is not correct. this is another question, but who are not perceived even today in russia. given that they took part in the opera for 8 years and during the last three months ago, i think we we have to look at these oligarchs in a different way, and this is the reality that we have to live with in the part of the oligarchy, it is leonid you . if it is not, it is not a professional very specific question that we actually wanted to finish, you will have one minute to answer it. the european union has developed a plan to replace gas from russia in order to get rid of energy dependence - this is fresh news from the

european commissioner for the internal market of this breton well, actually, the eu imports from russia's 155 billion cubic meters of gas per year, will gas become the basis of the 7th package of sanctions against russia? yes, mr. leonid , i can't say anything about gas imports. i only know that our gas transportation system that he will not be able to work on this from russian gas because it is built in the soviets, and that as for the first question regarding that , today i am involved in the processes of some government programs, so i must say that we faced what impression that for some government officials there is no war at all and they work and think and act as and as it was in