well, the russians simply concentrated the contract on this very village, it seemed to have been taken, but the ukrainians again just advanced there, but the specific names of the points are not named. there they took a break on kakhovka, but so far this is not happening. well, mostly, maybe technically , after all, the russians still have reserves there. but they still have something to throw up, but ours have also concentrated good forces there, so theoretically, everything is possible and up to i understand things correctly that the goal of our advancement there is still the road that goes to kherson or not , uh, dirt, no, there, about, well, it’s difficult to call it a road, it’s so expensive, but it goes to boryslav to the south, almost, well, almost directly to the south. and

then to kakhovka, well, it’s logical, because it’s davydov ’s ford to kherson, er, to the messenger, especially to stick to it, because from closer to mykolaiv, it’s to be done ah-ah-ah, but if from davydov’s dirt, it’s to stick to the dnipro, that is, there , or just a half-mile to kakhovka or somewhere closer to the east, in the area of ​​milo, it was logical because this it helped to penetrate the russian forces that are actually there now in the kherson region in the north and in the south of it, therefore, rather, everything is for this, you are on the khersonny, from here, there is no road to kherson, there is a road to kherson. it returns again through ingulets ago but it’s inconvenient there. well, i rather didn’t mean that. there ’s just an idea from kherson. it’s like a route that could be used to supply the russian forces and how cutting it would make it possible.

boryslav through mylovu yes, yes, there, but from her, that’s actually possible. yes, it’s just that it’s not, she’s not in kherson, she’s a specific one further east. look, you’ve already started talking about the fact that, well, the russians don’t have the opportunity to raise new reserves. they have the opportunity there is something more to focus on, as far as i can see. now there are only one of these two approaches - that really, the russian offensive on the territory of ukraine has not slowed down, that it does not have such a potential now, something is happening globally that the russians have passed the point climax because they have already more or less exhausted all the main forces that they have concentrated for the attack on ukraine, and now they are collecting what they have left somewhere from the reserves, they are taking out old equipment, well, that is, these are all the nuances, and uh, these are already

remnants . the troops are poorly trained and that is why the front line must stabilize, but there is another one that i recently saw such an opinion that, uh, the russians still have a lot of resources and that's all, and in this border war, well, in such a protracted phase, such a story can happen here that after all mass is simply mass itself artillery, even old, new, it doesn’t matter if there are tanks in the old, new, it doesn’t matter if people are trained or not, just a larger mass can beat professionalism, well, that is, no matter how professional the ukrainian army is, if it could not use any weapons there, that’s the main question that worries me because yes in theory well, i am not really concerned about the question of whether the russians will be able to capture three more salads and one dog there by the end of the year. maybe, but not very likely, but

in reality i am concerned about the question of whether the ukrainians will liberate kherson, for example, do not worry much more than whether the russians will theoretically be able to advance there somewhere and take some village of the donetsk region, uh, that's why this is the biggest question. i don't really think that the russians have such unlimited resources , again, this is a traditional mistake, do you think that russians in the reserve, unlimited money, unlimited shells , unlimited things, i really have a lot, but if it really was like that, we would have already lost, so we actually have it, let's talk about this aspect. you started talking, let's talk a little later, because now we have here the speech of the chairman of the verkhovna rada of ukraine, ruslan stepanchuk, at the plenary session of the european parliament, precisely about the provision of weapons to ukraine, the further implementation of sanctions

, as well as the recognition of the european perspective of ukraine, now let's watch a little live, it's literally 10 minutes and let's get back to our conversation, if i may say so, dear journalists, first of all, i want to thank the president of the european parliament and a great friend in ukraine, ms. reberka matsuoli to introduce the contribution she makes to support ukraine. i am very grateful to you, dear madam president, for your reberta ratzola was one of the first european politicians to respond to aid to ukraine and one of the first to come to the city of kyiv on april 1 to speak before the ukrainian parliament in at that time it was still

extremely dangerous in kyiv, cruise missiles were flying, a number of attacks were carried out on cities near kyiv , but you spoke before the verkhovna rada . greetings from all the deputies of the verkhovna rada because it was an extremely great honor for us. today i would like to inform you that i have a big working visit to many countries going on. it will be carried out very carefully but very quickly because this is our way. this is our progress. goal and we have the right to develop in the direction in which the will of the entire ukrainian people lies , so i emphasize once again that after receiving the candidate status, we expect to receive a clear and understandable

road map of our movement to the european union and we will go through this road map, thank you, president stefanchuk, this is what i could continue with the conclusions, this road needs it, we watched the speech of ruslan stefanchuk in the european parliament and here we go back to our broadcast with viktor trygubov , and oleksandr kovalenko , the military-political columnist of the information group, joined us is there any objection? come on. hello, oleksandr. greetings . viktor and i were talking about the fact that there are

two such approaches. i said that the russians are exhausting their possibilities. they don't have one such approach. they do not have the opportunity for serious offensives because they lack manpower, they lack new equipment, in principle, they have already concentrated everything for the previous strikes, but there is another approach that, after all, they have enough strength and mass. it does not matter whether she is trained there or not high-quality or low-quality, but the force can still convey professionalism , just the mass can convey professionalism, and viktor expressed his point about this, but what do you say about this? what do you think, can just the mass convey professionalism, and the russians the situation at the donbas bridgehead will continue to progress there anyway. it looks like the russian occupiers in terms of quantity. they have an advantage over the armed forces of ukraine in terms of

personnel, in terms of the number of equipment, and in terms of the number of weapons used. but nevertheless having the largest group of occupation units on the donbas bridgehead for the entire time of the full-scale invasion of ukraine, they do not demonstrate any phenomenal offensive actions there, which would really look like, for example the offensive in the wide front no, they are advancing in separate directions, moreover, they are advancing so close that it is very difficult to call it an offensive, because what we are seeing now in the area of ​​severodonetsk is that we are seeing threats in the direction of barvinkov and slavyansk, this is all a result of almost more than of two months of hostilities, this is precisely this large -scale advantage. what advantage did the group of occupying troops have, which had a numerical advantage over the armed

forces of ukraine? that is, what is it really? no, it is not professionalism. there is also a very interesting example. now in the zaporizhzhia region and we see how the russian occupiers of the zaporizhzhia bridgehead are regrouping and withdrawing part of their units in the direction of the kherson region, that is, they are trying to increase the number of their units in this way in order to block the actions of the armed forces of ukraine to the north and northeast from kherson, what does this mean that they don't actually have a reserve that they can use separately to strengthen their units in the kherson region. for this, they are regrouping the units that are in zaporizhzhia oblast, that is, they are not using their defense potential to hold the zaporizhia region, and in the near future i will not be surprised if we hear about the counteroffensive actions of the armed forces of ukraine in the zaporizhia region in the southern direction and

fairly successful counteroffensive actions. well, you know, i generally have the impression that everything depends on the russians, at least if you include them in the mass media, then this is generally a mortar, well, a flamethrower , more precisely, sanctions. and this is their whole hope, that is, when they want to advance in some place, they go there they are bringing in saws and they are starting to burn everything with thermobaric, well, these projectiles, recently, yes, when they are now, uh, there was a breakthrough of the ukrainian troops, uh, in the southern direction, they brought sun saws there, and all such an impression , there are no more arguments, that is, because the sun is shining - this is a close-range complex, it is used as effectively as possible, it is used at a distance of up to 6 km, that is, it is not even barrel artillery, so it is quite easy not only to destroy real artillery, but also

with the help of a uav, and by the way, it was on the northern bridgehead that a very large amount of sunbake went to our troops as trophies. well, because they did not have time to take them out of the combat zone and immediately after their use and in general transportation, see, you already mentioned about the fact that they are being destroyed by uavs. not bad, but i also know that experts are now talking about the fact that, in principle, the russians have strengthened their er this radio electronic development and in general there is protection er along the entire front and the use of ukrainian anti-aircraft missiles now, in principle, it will be difficult, and according to this, well, we need to somehow also change, that is, we simply hope that we will now saturate there with a

larger number of uavs and will fight. the russians used uavs for artillery in order to scout targets there and then hit them, but something needs to be changed, is it true or is this an exaggeration? well, come on, viktor. start, and then alexander, let's go in this order. of electronic warfare complexes, but it should be noted that a rather large number of such complexes were also destroyed for trophies during the first weeks of full-scale hostilities during the full headquarters invasion of ukraine. also, it all depends on how it is used. if it

was and how it is used against them in the enemy of rap, but there is another very important such moment, and the complex of rap, it must be located at some distance from the front line, and that is, it is vulnerable to some in cases specifically for the creation of artillery and high-precision artillery. by the way, howitzers such as the m-77 can destroy them quite well, which , even taking into account the safety buffer of 10 km, have the ability to destroy objects from the front line with actively reactive excalibur ammunition at a distance of more than 30 km that is, 10 km this is a buffer zone a without security and 30 km - this is already from the front line that is, this is exactly the distance where most of the command posts and control points of the russian command in the combat zone are located also directly if we get an even greater

range of high-precision weapons such as the m-142 and m270, and this will change the situation even more not in favor of the russian occupiers, and that is why they are panicking so much now, so in my opinion it is still situational, but this situation is exactly the advantage of some in some directions, right next to it, but this situation can change at any moment to the benefit of the armed forces of ukraine, thanks again to high-precision and high-tech weapons . in principle, it is clear that the russians are actively reacting to the fact that these new artillery are being delivered to ukraine, especially the long-range ones, it just caused a storm, and moreover, it is clear that some kind of attack is being carried out due to world changes, that is literally a recent article in the new york times about the fact that ukrainian soldiers

are not sufficiently trained to use foreign weapons, that there is not enough knowledge to use them, at the same time, french journalists, for example, went to the trail actually installation of the caesar self-propelled guns and saw that the ukrainian fighters there literally immediately only this caesar arrived at the front destroyed 81 enemy vehicles of one of these over there well, i don't know one there er i i er some such detachment of these guns there something like that and more than that there er, they filmed a wonderful story about how ukrainian soldiers trained there, we can see it now, we have such a small piece of it, also from the story we were invited to france for a short training, there was a lot of information about that, we tried to improve our skills as soon as possible skills well, actually, that is, you know, there is a struggle

for this, and here is such a question, first of all, it is a question of quantity, because it is clear that these conversations are not sufficiently trained . first of all, the question of quantity, because if you sent 10 communities there, it probably won't change the situation in the war, if you sent 20 of them, they probably won't change the current ones either, the other day, for example, the head of the secretary of the nsdc, danilov, said that we are for that in order to go to the counteroffensive, you need to mobilize more additionally 25 e-e-e-e fighters to form there it seems i do not remember five new groups there and, accordingly, have some new other amount of equipment and the question here as we

have to have the number of equipment to go on the offensive that is how much is realistic? we should put it in general. well, let’s not say for sure, we can’t talk about it. we don’t know that, but what numbers should we be starting from in order to talk about, uh, about the possibilities of victor’s counterattack? they are beautiful any significance of our or equipment, these data are not published, we don’t really know how much we have, again, how much we have problems not only with artillery, the same as, the supply of specific shells, then specific artillery, again , i don’t know what danilov is aiming for there are 25,000 people, i don’t know if it’s somewhere, he would probably mean the community type again. and where are those who are already forming? and where are those who are already studying? and in front of us belong

because we don't know about all the losses in our equipment, or about the actual readiness of those units that are already being prepared in our country, including in the west, regarding the excuses of the same french in german, evaporating the equipment, they were not really absolutely accurate . - because there is such a need, because there are relevant skills. they are, after all, well, if i had to say it. no, the natives are quite an experienced people, and the people are like that. yes, they know english, so we don't have such a problem. in fact, we don't have one. the problem is precisely in the city block, we actually have a problem precisely in the lack of artillery, as well as specific units in specific directions , moreover, ours are already constructing schemes for the use of a combination of, for example, different artillery systems, she has already caught up with us such a zoo eh left education eh with us uh, here is

nato equipment, here is non-nato equipment, here is the equipment of neutral countries, here is soviet equipment, and ours learned this zoo, including artillery , to use it effectively simply by combining it, about here, somewhere, it works 777 and here, somewhere our champion works, that is, there are no problems with training, moreover, they cost their own schemes, their own schemes of application in their own, well, this is what was written about in the instructions and statutes, there was an instruction in the statutes, it did not foresee that different techniques would be used, actually different manufacturers, but that's right, oleksandr. look, i'm continuing this topic. i also heard that, well , it's again a question of the amount of ammunition for these chemical weapons. it's as if there are at all, well , a little bit, not a couple days of operation of these systems normal situation, uh, from the volume that is

supplied, well, it is obvious that this cannot be said, because no one, well, it is published somewhere , but still, returning to the question. how do you look at the question, uh, well, at least roughly calculated there should be volumes of supply of e-e , in my opinion, it should be at least 20 batteries of the 80s and lilac installations or m-142 or m-270, depending on which one we are talking about, it is universal, this is precisely the launcher that can be used as e-e reactive ammunition and tactical missiles are precisely the launcher, and they differ exactly something cm-270 is a bradley chassis e and m-142 is a khimas e this is exactly the wheel base e of a tactical car e-e m11 e-e 40 and that is, it is the quantity that really is

the problem today, but others are still a moment e nobody it will not be fully and completely told in fact how many of these complexes will be provided to ukraine from the usa from great britain from another european country. because there are a lot of them in european countries. it is precisely these complexes that should be looked at in the arsenal. and in general , more than 1,300 units of them were produced, and no one will tell uh openly how much munitions will be provided to ukraine and regarding by the way, regarding the article in the new york times, i actually want to recommend well, i don’t know, it’s my recommendation personally, but i don’t comment on the new york times after one of the journalists wrote such an andrew hammer on the pages of this publication an article about the fact that it was on the eve of a full-scale

invasion of ukraine when volunteer battalions were formed, units to protect ukraine from the preparations for an invasion by the russian federation , he published an article that was devoted to because in ukraine nationalist nazi units are being formed, which threaten not so much russia as ukraine itself and its neighbors. here is such a wonderful article. by the way. these are the ones andrew kramer once injected himself with satellite 5 to tell the readers of the new york times what it really is it is an underestimated vaccine, and how good it is. well , it is also necessary to somehow filter the western press, because there is actually a lot of manipulation, it is a russian information company, it was published in the western press, because it does not exist in the ukrainian press meaning, as in russian. by the way, in addition to

these conversations about the fact that the ukrainian army needs to be trained there for a long time, there are also conversations about the fact that if it is going to be a long confrontation, then nato 's western arsenals in general will be exhausted and there will be no weapons in order to supply ukraine, well, first of all, it is not clear to me. and why is it about a new confrontation? well, it seems to me that there should be some kind of understanding as well as a strategy, let's talk about it, that is, what is strategic now for uh, well, for the western world is better is gradual the bloodletting of russia, or all the same, well , there is no other option here, in short yes, come on viktor, there are specific politicians who have specific political interests in their own countries, therefore, of course, for many of them, it is better in general that everything should be as it was

before, so that you can just trade normally for russia, and this is not a matter of strategic interest , it is a matter of local and personal political interest. therefore, so far. yes, of course, if there was a real political will in the west. according to russian methods, this event will have long been arranged so that russia would fall by the end of this year, unfortunately, such an event does not exist. unfortunately , there are different countries with different structures of interests and with different stereo degrees of hesitation in politics , so some countries of the european union help us all. what is other countries from the european union, germany, that's why now we have this rather than the restrained strategies of russia. what would be dominant in the west? in the west, there is a strategy , relatively speaking, great britain, which really provides for maximum pressure on russia the federation up to the point that it would become umbilical what is shared by the baltic countries, for example, what is shared by

poland is the strategy of germany, italy let 's somehow all reconcile, maybe there the ukrainians will make some concessions and we will all live again on the road so far it looks like this. that is why i say that there is no general strategy. the ukrainians must have a strategy. now, we must directly focus on our own. there are no administrative measures. oleksandr, i would like to hear from you, but now we have to go back to the live broadcast, and just finish it. well, in short, we have more. well, unfortunately, time has run out. well, so it was viktor , oleksandr kovalenko, and we hope to meet in a week. well, actually, watch espresso tv channel we are ukrainians, the people know how to get up and move on, about the fact that our nation cannot be destroyed, it is impossible to see the light somehow

, my house is my house, i stay here, live through tears, laugh correctly, know what will happen . let's do and rebuild and it will be even better than loving yourself life the first wedding dance your applause is what makes us who we are what no one can take away from us glory to ukraine on april 4 concert rrt illegally turned off the digital air ukrainian independent tv channels espresso the fifth and live on the website the cabinet of ministers of ukraine has registered a petition demanding that ukrainian tv channels be returned to the digital airwaves in order to sign the petition . first you need to register, it's very simple go to the website petition in you.gov.ua there

go to the registration tab and enter all your data, say your phone number and email, confirm all your data, enter the code that will be sent to your mobile, create a password that will certify that you are not a robot, give consent to the processing of personal data, check all your data again and click the register button to complete the registration, go to your specified email where the website letter will arrive. click on the link in the letter that will return you to the petition site, enter your email, password , enter, return to the main page of the site petitions, open a petition for the return to the digital air of ukrainian tv channels espresso of the fifth and direct press the button to sign the petition, the inscription will appear signed your signature is confirmed and taken into account let's return to the digital air ukrainian patriotic channels together, we will not

allow freedom of speech to be destroyed in ukraine analyze the most current events simply in attracting influential guests and professional experts to the air, antin borkovskyi did this when it was not yet mainstream