check all your data once again and press the register button to complete the registration , go to your specified email where the website letter will arrive click on the link in the letter that will return you to the petition site, enter your email password, enter , return to the main page of the petition site, open the petition for returning to the digital air ukrainian tv channels espresso of the fifth and direct press the button to sign the petition, the inscription signed will appear your signature is confirmed and taken into account, let's return together to the digital air ukrainian we will not allow patriotic channels to destroy the freedom of speech in ukraine to analyze the most relevant events simply on the air by attracting influential guests and professional experts antin borkovskyi did it when it was not yet mainstream and now he is returning from june 11 again on the

espresso studio tv channel an event with anton borkovskyi what on saturday at 1:00 p.m. with a repeat at 10 p.m. studio west do not miss the most important thing glory to ukraine is a program verdict my name is serhiy rudenko good day and good health to all today is the 105th day the heroic resistance of the ukrainian people against the russian occupation at night the russians shelled mykolaiv kharkiv the critical situation remains in kherson oblast the enemy storms severodonetsk destroys other cities of luhansk oblast in donetsk oblast from small arms tanks artillery mortars rockets hails shelled avdiivka kurakhovo ocheretino lastochkina and new york in the last day russian occupiers lost in ukraine has 140 russian soldiers, the most in the

slavic direction. this was reported by the general staff of the armed forces of ukraine at the beginning of the already great war the russians have already lost 31,500 people in ukraine, 1,393 tanks, 3,429 armored combat vehicles, 70 artillery systems, 213 multiple- launch rocket systems, 96 air defense systems, 212 aircraft, 178 helicopters - 2,406 units of automotive equipment, 13 ships, boats, 125 cruise missiles, 559 drones, 53 units of special equipment i have already said that the situation is quite tense around the north of donetsk, heavy fighting is going on there, the russians are trying to seize the city, they are attacking the city, well, ukrainian defenders are holding the defense and, as reported, too

british intelligence, the city is being attacked from three directions at once, and according to british intelligence, russia is concentrating its offensive on the central sector of donbas , it remains on the defensive on the other flanks. ivan bohun's special forces brigade, igor lapin, let's talk with him about severodonetsk, the eastern front, the situation in kherson oblast, mykolaiv oblast, and zaporizhzhia. since we perfectly understand that the russian federation is trying to attack at once from

several sides in the east and south, it is already preparing the holding of so-called referendums on the accession of part of the kherson region or kherson region and part of the zaporizhzhia region to the russian federation . today, information has already appeared that the heads of the so-called occupation administrations working in kherson and also in zaporizhzhia, they announced that by the end of the year, such a referendum could take place, what does this mean, this means that the russian federation is preparing a pseudo-referendum, russia will attack the city at once from three directions, at the same time the british report that russia is concentrating its offensive on the central sector of donbass , it remains on the defensive on the other flanks. how do you assess the current situation on the eastern front and especially around severodonetsk, mr. major? well, i can say that, in principle, the

russians will use the tactics they in fact, they use it not on the first day, not on the first week, and not on the first month, eh, it’s an example of a shepherd’s pie, an example of other cities. that is, where they ca n’t take it, they approach and hold it by the teeth leave and the artillery begins to work, displacing the portal quarter by quarter, destroying quarter by quarter . as they say, we saw it in mariupol, we saw it in the fall. well, i personally was there when i was, that is, and in fact, they enter the practice of burning from the earth to the ruins, that's what the guys are holding, of course they are holding, but first, you need to understand that the artillery is going in our direction, and you need to understand that the artillery is responding, and the response is not even to the positions already occupied by the enemy, we mean the city because there may be civilians and so on, the answer to the

enemy's artillery is that for today the main duel is artillery against artillery, the fact that the guys work in the city, uh, as they say, and successfully hold back the enemy's advance, that is, until the city is completely destroyed and in this is the biggest problem in this situation and let's say it like this. well, we are all military, we understand what is happening from the point of view of the planning made by the russians and those bets on uh that russia is doing today, they don't care how much infrastructure will be destroyed, they don't the difference is how many peaceful people will die there, they do n't even care how many for 200 it's theirs, you understand, the main thing for them is the result at any cost and in fact they put everything they need on it. 000 killed. and i understand it is more than 100,000 if you use the math one to

three. is there a limit in russia beyond which they will say what? well, the losses are so huge that it is necessary to leave ukraine. well, since at one time the soviet union realized that the war in afghanistan does not bring them anything good and then the truth was 15,000 in 10 years and here in three months more than 30,000 were killed well, look first of all the war in afghanistan this war was divided into the soviet union and all as the republics of that soviet union say and let's still take into account the fact that many ukrainians fought in afghanistan and that is why the russians needed more well, it took the soviet union more than 10 years to understand that this is nonsense based not on the loss of personnel based on the losses resources of material resources today in russia there is a bunker leader in which, in principle, there is a

difference in the number of the population because there will be 140 million or 40 million people living in russia. the number will be critical in order to disturb the society and not in order to frighten there or stop those bunker leaders and their e-e generals in this situation this limit has nothing to do with the resource of artillery shells and iron man, even the old one, even the old one, even the broken one, even the torn one, and the looted one, well , there are a lot of them there, and that's why he will do what he basically does, let's recall the first group. if i'm not mistaken, there were about 160,000 concentrated on our borders. uh, near kiev, near chernigov, and near kharkiv, they were shot down quite

seriously, uh, after that, putin announced some other wave of mobilization, and instead of the pskov paratroopers , the ulyanovsk paratroopers went on the road that now we will go there in droves, and that was it second wave thus, it was worth nothing for him to mobilize 300,000 over the last period, uh, now another wave of mobilization is underway, plus an increase in the draft age for their so-called volunteers, for putin to collect another 100,000 or 200,000 will not be a big problem for him all the more , he did not start pulling from the western regions of his country, or let's say we are from those regions that have the opportunity to successfully use the internet , but he started pulling from siberia from the far east, well, russia itself is, well, such a beggar country. i am talking now about the people. they are not educated enough

. as they say, even if they are rich and successful, they have nothing to lose in principle. in good faith, that is, the money is paid, which allows them to be raised, and in this way, russian soldiers go to earn money only later, when they understand when you take them out of field battles, we are already talking about the fact that there are a lot of so-called refuseniks among them, and so on. and we need to talk about this in order to make it clear to everyone that there is a large enough wave of refuseniks in russia, and only this can stop other recruits from going voluntarily there is no evading the draft that putin is doing. you have already told igor about the weapons that are coming to ukraine or have already arrived during the war . the united states of america has transferred military

equipment and weapons to ukraine in the amount of more than 4 billion dollars today. this is more than any other the country is such an official statistic from washington, now there are new details about these weapons that the united states of america transferred to ukraine six and a half thousand food supplies and anti-tank missiles 20,000 light anti-tank weapons 1,500 missiles stingar 108 m-77 howitzer and with 220,000 charges, four rocket systems of a volley sniffer mars well, and many, many other eh, let's say so, other weapons, equipment gets to donbas, where the combat operations are concentrated, you said that eh, this equipment, these weapons it is still not enough, why do you think the western countries that have united in a conditional block that can be called ramstein when 40 defense ministers were meeting at the german

air base of the united states of america why why these weapons are slowly coming to us or the west still hopes in some way to stop putin and er hopes to restrain ukraine because it is clear that providing more weapons to ukraine will allow er ukrainian soldiers to push the russians much further than the same west is now predicting well, let's do it in part, i still don’t leave the thesis that we also have a lot to blame. well, we denied the possibility of an invasion to the last, and so on. people did not want to believe in the fact that russia agreed . but nevertheless, let’s remember the same javelins, and especially gen-lavas, how much did they help us burn russian equipment, i would not

write off the unaccountable and our stugna e kortsar, our ukrainian anti-tank development, and so on. that is , it works, as for the stinger and the former soviet manpads needle, these are also good things which we need, let's not forget what was provided to us. hmm , the equipment is meant. explain the ranks for the so -called soviet caliber, but the reserves in europe of this soviet caliber are not unlimited and they are actually not exhausted. i still today us provide salvo fire systems, for example, you said there are four units, you understand that we need to saturate the armed forces with them. artillery to saturate our armed forces in such an area

for several thousand kilometers. that is, well, you also understand that help is help, it is not business , not so much business, what kind of help. there are no more threats in the world for them. well, this is the first point. the second point is still the work of diplomacy. i think it is working well today, let's give credit to the fact that we are pushing putin's line in many directions. of course, there is a very strong russian front and in europe, which blocks many things. i will not talk about hungary today or about other countries that are openly working uh, well, let's say it's not for european values. they replaced the word "e" with the word " democracy" interests, yes, the interests of one's own country, perhaps, i am not saying that their personal interests, although for a politician, personal interests can also lie in the

political life of longevity and so on, that is why a lot of countries, uh, express themselves precisely from the point of view of their own interests, their politicians, leaders , helmsmen, and so on and this is the russian lobby, it works. well, in many places of the world, it is the second one. another point that i want to emphasize. why so slowly or not slowly? well, you understand that russia is working to split opinions in the european community. the nato community and at the expense of the game we still are. maybe in some countries we see that the russians sometimes achieve er this or that success well, let's look at it from the perspective of the scandinavian countries joining nato from the perspective of finland nato, for example, is the position of turkey itself in relation to the kursk party, with which other western democracies are cooperating. therefore, this question is quite debatable. i would, for today,

still, first of all, say to our western thank you to our partners, because they help us survive, we need to win, because i have repeatedly said, god forbid, after the last ukrainian soldier falls, the soldiers of western countries will begin to fall after that, because putin will not stop, and in this situation, we need to work harder in the foreign policy department precisely on these theses. i am not saying that they do not work, they do work, but i say that even more so because it is necessary to convey to the western consumer that the losses will be much greater from the point of view and economic, if ukraine will fight longer, and in order to speed up the victory, of course, artillery systems today play a significant role. i’m not even talking about the air defense systems that have been invented, which we need to shoot down

russian missiles and russian planes, and what’s more, we need air defense systems with a fairly large radius actions because not only aviation is fighting against us, there are assault aircraft or russian tractors. but russia began to use strategic aircraft that take off somewhere beyond the urals and turn around somewhere near belarus, shelling our cities, we need these long-range systems. we also need them in order to be able to neutralize the missiles that russia fires at our infrastructure facilities. i emphasize that they do not work against the armed forces, including that they work to destroy objects granary infrastructure and similar to how in kyiv they fired at wagon repair enterprises there, explaining that they were there with tanks and so on, that is, the russians do not care what they destroy, they will destroy everything and everything that is not they can steal, they will destroy the zno from the report that the amount of the arms contract between ukraine and

poland, which is called the largest in 30 years, will be about 3 billion zlotys and more than 650 million euros, the office of the polish prime minister reported that it is about the supply of more than 50 crab howitzers mr. igor to you as to a person who absolutely clearly understands how long it will take the ukrainian military to master new weapons, it is clear that there are a lot of new weapons, a lot of high-tech weapons, a lot of weapons which the ukrainian military has not yet held in its hands and has not fired from it, how long will it take from the delivery of these weapons to the exit to the positions, well, look, i don't think that it will take a lot of time for this, uh, when they said and how long does it take to master the bayraktars a how long does it take to master the planes and so on? well,

of course, the plane is a rather serious technological thing, but on the other hand, the artillery systems. i think it will be, well, let's say that in order to master them, it is measured in days . not even for weeks, but for days. i wouldn't i would pay attention to this in the context that it is a problem for our soldiers to master any weapon because, in principle, any weapon is the same, especially on another point, what i want to emphasize is the weapon of european countries, it is made for people, it is meant for soldiers, it is how many it took us a lot of time to master in love, well, since the video on youtube is basically two minutes long, it’s true. you’re already watching, and the tanks near kharkiv caught fire , let’s remember how much time passed from the moment of the delivery of the first enlaves to the moment of the invasion of russian tanks in the kharkiv region a few days ago in this

situation i would not focus on this because i think that for this we need a lot of time to master, there is no question of the production of those systems, there is a question of rearmament for new generations of our western partners and the fuel style of the impossibility for the russian troops belarus stretches our defense by another 1,000 km of the border because we are forced to keep certain forces concentrated on the borders with belarus, including in my homeland in volyn, rivne region, zhytomyr region, and so on. very, very many border with belarusians, that's why today we were not against one of the largest armies in the world, you know. that is, we are not fighting against russia alone today. russia we are fighting today for our future, but against an aggressor who uses a lot of resources from different countries. not only material political military-political alliances, they do not include

a lot of countries that, in principle, work in the interests of russian propaganda or russian politics or russian militancy. by the way, mr. igor, i remembered one of our conversations before the new year, we talked about threats from the northern front, from the northern border, there are more than 1,000 km, and we have a border with belarus. eh, the armed forces of belarus are going to accumulate 80,000 eh military personnel on their respective southern border, and on our northern border, eh , to expand eh their army on this border, eh, now from the territory of belarus, eh, russia is trying turn the bridgehead into another bridgehead and create all the prerequisites for, as i understand it, to constantly

keep our armed forces on the northern front under tension, how likely is it that at some stage of the current war, the emphasis from the eastern front can be transferred to the northern that i cannot say, because for this you need to have a lot of intelligence, but the very fact that lukashenko today, even with statements, already helps putin, because we are also forced to take into account these statements, take into account those possibilities of the belarusian side and as they say keep more than less of these or other whiskeys are necessary in order to deter a possible offensive if you think this will happen , so let's talk about how likely it is, well, look , before the new year, back in december, i said that the main blow to russia would be on kyiv is near the teteriv river, where we have gostomel, ivankiv, and

bucha irpin. i have been talking since december. well, someone did not believe me today. of course, this factor of belarus cannot be rejected, and the general staff of course also emphasized this in relation to the amount of whiskey that lukashenko can mobilize, well mobilize maybe he won't be able to declare about 70,000 additional and so on, but you understand that in belarus there is still internet once again, let's remember the support of lukashenko lukashenko was actually supported by the security forces who received colossal salaries, therefore the economic pressure on belarus can play now a very big restraining factor for the lukashenka regime, because it is necessary to get money from somewhere, russia has not yet gone bankrupt and belarus seems to have melted away from obenko that is, these are countries that have certain financial resources, but the economic pressure on belarus today must be total. why are we doing this

because the fact is that for playing with putin they only gave him the fact that for eight years he slowly gathered his strength and did what wanted to flirt with lukashenka without economically destroying him, this foundation of lukashenka well , it will not lead to anything good either, because he will feel the weakness of the west or the less the west puts pressure on luka, the more he will think about him weakness, let's remember how he got on the nerves of our western partners with refugees on the border, we all remember that. and in this situation. in this context, i think that it is necessary to remind the western partners about this, whether a large army will be able to concentrate something, so will it be able to it is my deep conviction to mobilize to carry out some things there. they will be able to , why? well, because lukashenko. you can simply close the border and those conscripts will not go anywhere, but

turn them over to the military commissariat. will the army go to fight against ukraine, some part of the possible risk maybe for some promises of buns or money, i don’t know if it will be massive, like for example phonetic faith in putin in russia and phonetic faith in lukashenka well, we know that it cannot be because there is such massive support of the historical support of its leader as in russia mine was only during the time of hitler or mussolini mussolini in his time there had such support among the population, but lukashenka does not have such support, so this if this, well, these realities, if they will happen, they will not, well, let 's say, have the popular support of the people's love for lukashenka is not there, and therefore, without such support , it is natural to say that he will be able to attack ukraine with such forces. we are there with 70 thousand and so on. he will not be able to attack ukraine. will it

be possible to use the russians? do you enter from belarus or not from belarus, in what form does it make any difference to them at all the following question arises: does the self-proclaimed president lukashenko control anything in belarus at all, well, it means how much it will depend on him, because his dependence on putin is obvious and demonstrative, just look how much it will depend on lukashenka, i can't say in that context what, um, whatever it is to give, you understand there is such a concept as giving the command to start so i emphasize once again 70,000 they don't want to go to ukraine to fight in ukraine, you understand. but some part can go and make it there, well, a big problem , a big problem in the context - in the text of the question of forces , means of defense, you understand.

to go fight against ukraine, but if it is even 10,000, well, let's take 10,000 and take it here in, god forbid, some young woman in our western regions, so in this situation it is a completely different war. it seems to me that our western partners should also react more sharply and let's say that not only economically, but also physically to be ready to contain such a war in the center of europe. well, you understand. if the second country , or the third, rather, the country already joins its armed forces against ukraine, what will we do? wait for someone else. we will wait until kazakhstan, the members join, until armenia starts attacking ukraine with the remnants of the troops that remained there after the azerbaijani one, after the situation with the mountain deer or what will we wait, or until five countries have come here in the armed forces and then all the whole world