now young people appeared in belarusian cities, well, of russian origin, obviously representatives of private military companies there, well, at least the day before yesterday, it seems that we, we, we were included in belarus and this information was given to us, or you or you , information about what is now appeared in belarusian cities e-e people with russian passports are such latent russian e military or representatives of private military companies. the information can be connected if they even come, and that lukashenko also announced the creation of a militia, that is, a militia, this is exactly putin's option, a militia was created in donetsk, a luhansk militia was created in abkhazia, er, in

georgia, that is, wherever russians come, they create militia from collaborators who just fight and then join all the rest of the books, mobilize, we studied the situation that there can be a militia in belarus, we have a lot of military people of russian origin who during the soviet union settled here and remained, and whose children are also considered military personnel, continues the dynasty, and according to our estimates , there may be about 15,000 military personnel, but from them, they can create an militia . if someone comes anyway, they can join this militia, but uh, specifically, no one has any information that some kind of recruitment has already been announced and some bases are being created, only the conversations are going on, oleksandr will clarify please, you said on the territory, that is, for your information, russian troops are now on the territory of

belarus, are they present or not? and the troops are located in russia, exactly, that's only the borders , the majority of the troops left for the rest, according to our estimates, there are several thousand, but i don't know for the offensive, several thousand malovatok of course oleksandra on public support for such a step putin's rating as you know, after the invasion of ukraine, the height of the russians enthusiastically welcomed the war with ukraine, it is possible that luka is simply counting on such a step will simply increase his rating within the country, because, well, all the russian channels in belarus, as i understand it, are being demonstrated and people are also determined to fight against ukrainian nazism. it is lukashenko himself in this plot, ukrainian nazis said that lukashenko's rating will increase, please , after the war, i think that no, no one wants to die if the first victims go to belarus, the rating will go up unequivocally

. if he understands that way, why should our children die there ? well, alexander lukashenko will say, er, say, and everyone will go to kill the ukrainian nazis in the hut, then there is no fable about the huts, but they tell this fable that supposedly ukrainian nationalists really burned people there study the history, dig in the documents, there are no ukrainian nationalists, these are prisoners from the kiev cauldron of the soviet army, they participated in this, that is, ukrainian nationalists have nothing to do with it, and different nationalities are accepted. well, there can be ukrainians there were more of them by nationality , there were also russians there, including other nationalities, well, you and i know this, and you can explain anything to us on television oleksandr and you are engaged in this kind of resistance in the middle of the security forces, so are they ex-security forces

belarusians if i understand correctly, and there is a percentage or a number, how many of these people are not ready to support the declared government and are ready to resist within the power structures of belarus and its former members in force a-a well, this information is classified with us and we don’t want to talk about it. there is a little, but of course there is a lot , even very much. we get information from any parts that we need. we have someone to write to . they are connected, they are just waiting for a certain moment when something like a revolution will come and they will be ready to support us thank you oleksandr for your work and for your comments on our broadcast oleksandr eh hara will already be with us oleksandr azarov about belarus told us

the ex-head of the guboza department of the ministry of internal affairs of belarus was with us. thank you. let's go to oleksandr khara. we congratulate him. the invasion of the belarusian army on the territory of ukraine will take place, he really does not know in what form and in what direction, well, they say that in the gomel region, while the concentration is taking place, well, this is sensational information, all military experts are already ukrainian are sure that this will not happen. and how do you predict, please? well, you know, here you can use a phrase from the movie, cards, money, two barrels. guy roars, who never underestimates the stupidity

of idiots. already sees the pressure exerted on the russian federation and belarus. he sees that this war did not go the way they had planned at the time. so it makes no sense for him to join such a sloppy discussion, but on the other hand, we understand that he can't and to it is very hard to argue with putin , since his entire government, in principle, rests only on the handouts of the economic ones. without a word, he understands what can happen if putin decides to replace him with someone, although well, for now there is no sense in this, but of course that we we have to watch. there are alarming points, alarm bells that are planned to increase the armed forces of the republic of belarus from 45 to 80 thousand.

training, they talk about, let's say, a smooth transition - this is from peacetime to wartime, and all these things are certainly disturbing to us, and the most important thing is that we must not forget that belarus is first of all a military and political ally of the russian federation and has always looked the same at the world and wants nato as a storm for them, the maidan was kyiv in the throat of course that all this remained . well, it is definitely that she is an accomplice of this armed aggression against ukraine, even if that, well, so far there has not been a single non-belarusian belarusian military officer on ukrainian territory. they didn't kill ukrainians, but having given our territory to the gentlemen from the airspace of belarus, they shoot at the masters with rockets and er, with canders from the ground, and now, by the way, these iskanders have increased. therefore, it goes without saying that it is and not just like that, and therefore it is definitely impossible to rule it out although and our general staff says that there are no signs of the formation of strike groups yet.

well, this does not mean that after a certain time they did not appear, so somewhere. i don't know about the theory of probability. i would say there are still some 0:3 percent . -e probabilities are such a with respect to ot public support is still any totalitarian state or belarus is a totalitarian country. it supports all the actions of the population, the civil society of its leader and its leader in russia , putin's support and rating increased after the start of the war with ukraine to sky-high heights in belarus. what do you think will be different? my prediction is that belarus strongly supports the invasion and fervently supports its own lukashenka in the event of the start of open hostilities against ukraine, what do you think, well, no, honestly, the money is with the russians, i agree because it is a big the territory is all this liberal small stratum

it is simply smeared across russia and the rest - it is simply those who like the greatness of the empire there are some other such false theories and with the belarusians it is somewhat different, despite the fact that it was such a well, you can say a part by the hand of the peace there is also propaganda of the second world war and against america and other things. but there was no such effort by russian channels and e -information in the information space, in fact lukashenko was cunning here and he tried well, not to repeat the mistakes of the ukrainians in that number and that's why he actually pushed out the informational influence, this is the first moment, the second moment of the belarusians, unlike the russians, well, they are higher than the das, culturally, linguistically, and historically, definitely. to be honest, i don't remember if we ever had enmity and we fought well, let's say serious with each other, and with russia, we have the times of yuri dolgoruky. we somehow can

not solve the problem there - the primacy of kyiv or moscow. this is an unjust war comes from the russian federation, and i don’t think that they support the council, but they silently support it. yes, but let’s see how many there were when they went out protesting against the so-called lukashenka elections, and if we compare the weight and size of russia and belarus, then it was on - a much larger number of belarusians did not agree with lukashenka's regime, that is why there is such silent resistance. but they understand their weakness, they understand that the russians can quickly, let's say, invade, but some of them are already there. well, first of all, before the war, there were two the units are small, but still, the russian military has always had such a symbolic presence in belarus. and now there are also combat

units. i honestly don't think that this war is supported by the majority of belarusians . oleksandr. well, we too. we saw these massive rallies of belarusian citizens . spoke out against the war with ukraine against russian troops invading ukraine, in particular the kyiv region from the territory of belarus, we remember correctly these rallies, these protest actions of these people sarcasm, of course, because they just ate, swallowed and sat quietly, you know , i think it will be the same. god forbid if they crawl a second time, unfortunately. well, you know, you were sabotaged on the railway, and you know one, my good belarusian a friend said, you must understand our character, he is a ukrainian, if he was offended, he became and gave politics and belarus, he can rub it in there, but then in the evening he will come with a knife and stab the one who offended him, and probably they just

understand that they are a small nation and they have for that in order to survive, you need to use a different strategy, and i think that this is actually the fact that they swallowed this war , it is not because they agree with it, but they simply do not understand that they cannot stop it in this way, but there was silent resistance, and i do not know well, later historians will assess the extent to which they thwarted certain plans of the russians. let's say these belarusian partisans. i think that's actually what we expected. based on our experience of the maidan, we definitely couldn't have expected the belarusians. remember that they walked with flags... is with these white, red, and white flags, there were no european or ukrainian flags there, and they tried to make it not too similar to the maidan. they wanted to avoid directing, well, this is not exactly their tradition , but on the other hand, so as not to cause such a negative reaction actually their

national, that is, they chose their way, but i am still sure that they do not support this war and definitely do not want to fight with us, of course there are some problems in the russian law enforcement agencies. i apologize to the belarusians. but i think that for example, the kgb is tougher, more hawkish and more pro-russian than the military, and that is precisely why this is the difference. let's say it's a difference. it can play in our favor, oleksandr. i also want to ask you about the european parliament. our chairman of the verkhovna rada ruslana stefanchuk was there today. arm ukraine, implement the toughest sanctions, and also recognize the european perspective of ukraine, your forecasts and your assessment of today's speech will be mutual they add and today there was a council of nova on doing

so definitely that this is the right job in fact, i would say that the president of ukraine like taran or he addresses the heads of states and parliaments and the society of our partners and before that there are european but also of course, other representatives of the government are very good, but i don't think that this speech and this visit can change any false opinions, and from the actual position of the germans or the french, it is unlikely that they will decide. not so in ukraine just for words, because you know. to be honest, it was so strange to hear from the chancellor of germany that germany helps ukraine the most out of the europeans . so he meant security, help when that doesn't happen, yes. that is, in general.

he says and he said this in connection with the people of lipov but before that, do you remember how he had such an essay and such a discussion, well, in germany, is it possible to forcefully answer, but i don't think that such are the opinions of pacifists or those who were afraid to insult putin, which means not to humiliate the russians. what do they do from such a single visit? they change their minds, definitely not, but definitely what others do, and we actually have to constantly maintain a certain degree of informational presence of ukraine because there are several, shall we say, great dangers for us now and in the near future prospects, the first danger is unconditional - it is related to the food crisis, the food crisis, which will also affect the citizens of the european union. let's not say yes to wealthy countries, where

the situation will be destabilized and perhaps we will see large waves of such refugees towards a well-fed europe, of course it can be a little let's say undermine the support that is from the europeans in relation to ukraine, the second point is inflation, it is and objective reasons, even if there would be no war, but the war is definitely pushing the third point - these are energy issues, because we have to give up russian gas and oil, and this means buying in other places a little more expensive or investing in infrastructure in the long term is the right thing to do, but now it is definitely burdening the economy, and we know that there is, let's say, a slowdown in the development of the economy, and maybe even a recession in the same germany, and these are all factors that will definitely push the governments away. it is possible to adjust

our position in relation to us, and not, most importantly, to respond to the demands of our society, which will definitely want to eat, be warm, not have, let’s say, even threatening rhetoric from the side of the russian federation and that is why the theoretical e can intensify all kinds of peace plans there that do not suit us very well oleksandr we only watched the news there was a story about today's visit of the minister of foreign affairs of russia lavrov to ankara, he met with the turkish head of the turkish foreign ministry malolyut e chavu shavla and he said i recorded such a thing for myself, i think it is a pretext or not a pretext or a freudian pretext. he said that the purpose of this special operation, the so-called war in ukraine , remains unchanged, he said to get rid of it almost literally the south of ukraine under the influence of ukrainian nazis and nationalists, did he slander or not? well , at first, that was not the idea of ​​the special operation, the

denazification of the whole of ukraine, not only the south, has something changed now, or did he simply slander the ministers , you know, there is even such a sign on the internet, some russian liberals have put it together in order to navigate the goals of this aggression or military operation, as they say. actually, if you remember, on the 24th, putin indicated that he came to ukraine to stop the genocide of russians that is, this was the main idea, now the idea of ​​genocide. they somehow, well, that is, countering the ukrainian genocide. they somehow left for other plans, and there was denazification, demilitarization and other things, but the child said well, actually lavrov, is it true, was in the 14th and 15th years, they did not succeed to create this pseudo-formation of novorossia, the meaning of which was to cut off the central and western ukraine from the sea, or definitely without our black sea

parks, this is actually well, we will now see this crazy blow to our economy, and definitely that ukraine cannot survive on a large scale if it does not have access to world markets through our ports , because of this, the same grain. it is very visible here, i see somewhere the forecast of our ukrainian economists who say that only 20% of last year's exports will be able to interrupt by land there, well, of course, the railway, it means less money in ukraine. but most importantly, it means more hungry people in africa, asia and the middle east, so there is a goal, there is a goal, they will try to do it, and of course that our task is to prevent this. thank you , oleksandr. we will talk about hunger in the next part

of the broadcast. days putin continues the strategy of blackmail in particular and the threat of world hunger blocked ukrainian ports negotiations with turkey without ukraine what does this possible crisis look like now crisis for the world and the position of ukraine for you, indeed , the escalation of military operations led to the fact that we do not have the opportunity to fully use the sea ports. and that were contained before the war period, we unloaded about five million tons of grain, and during the war period, we began to look for new logistics routes and this is by land. well, we have partial river ports today . we have river ports along the danube by rail and road, but of course in these conditions we can say that we will be able to increase at least that potential

which was before the war period is very difficult, because today we have the opportunity to unload about 1 million 740,000 tons, which we did in may. of course, these are not the same indicators . and various meetings held by the cabinet of ministers of ukraine, appealing to the world community to act as certain guarantors by a third party, gave the opportunity to unblock the sea corridors so that the black sea corridors would work against each other. and we we still had the opportunity to sell the temporary balances that we had left from last season and to have the opportunity in a few weeks, when we start harvesting the crops, to also export and sell them. because a lot depends on these funds. before the war period, it was about 45% of the foreign exchange earnings that we received from the export of agricultural farms, e.e., our grain. what is your forecast. how can this situation

be resolved with the ports, or can ukraine enter into some agreements? the russian federation puts forward then i am sure that we will not agree to these agreements. and we have, well, we have such a bad experience of communicating diplomatically with russia, you know that until the middle of february, there were promises that there would be no offensive, there were results from the world leader, but on february 24, we all woke up with you from the bombing that was carried out throughout the territory of ukraine, therefore there must be guarantees issued to a third party, and guarantees to the country that can actually today guarantee the safety of the passage of ships with ukrainian cargo in that country which, in the event of an attack, could protect itself accordingly. that is, it should be a fairly serious and good military fleet on the side of this

country. in principle, the president of ukraine trusts erdoğan today in their relations, and you know that today there is a meeting where, in principle, there is a discussion of a possible option of exporting from the territory of ukraine by sea routes, what will they agree to? well, we will watch the dialogue in the future, but the situation itself is strange when in these agreements the ukrainian side is not accepted as the country with which it should move and with which demining of the territory should actually be carried out. well, we are all waiting for certain diplomatic messages that will be made after today's meeting in turkey. thank you. until now, the agrarian security of our country has already changed the picture inside the country, so it is more the product remains in the country so that it was supposed to be exported, how does it change the agricultural business as a whole and the small business that is the budget-forming in some places, well, it changes very much

considering that it is the lack of funding lack of receipt of funds that could be invested in the development of one's enterprises, these funds are used to pay taxes, these funds are used to pay wages, with which innovative things are purchased that serve to develop agrarian business, and the situation may be more acute during the period of harvesting winter crops, because the employee the investor's company we passed on a certain enthusiasm on a certain stock, but if it is within one and a half or two months, we will not understand, well, with whom, we will not understand the question of whether exports are being adjusted because of and about that this can lead to the fact that a large number of farmers may not go out with sowing for the autumn campaign and then the world will face the last famine even more acutely than in the 22nd year because now we actually have grain but we cannot export and if the situation

worsens in this way, then we may not have the amount of grain that we could export, because we only sow the part that will be enough to feed the territory of ukraine, you are already talking about the future harvest, yes and what are the problems this means the future of the autumn sowing company, because we are now harvesting, that is , it was sown in the fall. now we are harvesting it, of course , there is how to store and sell it . understand the world to think whether we actually have these two months in order to come out of a constructive position and propose how the export of agricultural products by sea will be carried out before this visit and the meeting of the head of the russian foreign ministry, lavrolas, with his colleague, we are abroad in february , what is happening today, and we watched it in the news, but first, literally three days ago, the

ambassador of ukraine to turkey, vasyl bodnar, says that turkey participates in the theft of ukrainian grain that grain is exported through turkish waters to turkish ports, it is entered by the russians, black grain is imported through turkey, it arrives in a few days, and the minister of foreign affairs of russia goes to turkey to negotiate with the minister of foreign affairs of turkey about where blockade of ukrainian ports, i.e. why? in order to steal ukrainian grain more effectively. well, we are completely serious. well, we are talking about the fact that there is some prospect of such negotiations among other things. today, lavrov was asked by a journalist of our public. it seems that it was osman pashak. maybe i am wrong . he said well, literally, the question sounded like, in addition to the grain stolen in ukraine, will it be possible to sell it to russia, a ukrainian journalist asked the minister of foreign affairs of russia well, he said in the sense at first, then he said that this is a constant headache for you

about where you think of stealing everything, everyone does it, i answer you, we are engaged in the implementation of the goal, and this goal has been publicly announced, to relieve the east and south of ukraine from the pressure on the rural regime in general. the participation of turkey or well, how can you be serious after such a statement to such negotiations in ankara, please give your comment. i carefully re-read the interview e-e p sent to turkey and he then said that the journalists they took his title wrong, the context about the stolen grain that turkey buys. he said that stolen grain from the territory of ukraine may enter turkey, it goes according to russian documents, and the turkish side needs to be more careful in receiving e-vessels moving from the territory of crimea, considering that since 2014 year, there is a ban on the reception of vessels moving from the temporarily occupied territory of crimea

, if the words of our ambassador on the territory of turkey were true. and indeed today, when russia carries out eh let's say the theft of ukrainian eh from ukrainian agrarians of ukrainian grain, she falsifies it all under russian documents and we have nothing left but at least for today to diplomatically show and tell that it is moving precisely from the occupied crimea that it is moving from the port in there are satellite images of sevastopol that confirm this. and actually one of such examples . ordinary work and workload, but this does not remove the question of the fact that today we really need to actually solve this problem with exports, and yet, just like you, just like me, i am waiting for certain,

clear messages, who will be the guarantor, not only the turkish side, maybe there will be representatives of the united nations, it is possible that the nato military fleet will be involved as a grant that knows the successful stories of escorting certain cargoes in different parts of the world in different maritime parts of the world. for example, we we know the stories of pirate lands, when certain uh-uh-uh cargoes move, so if it is normal for us well, this is the number one issue, because it depends not only on this, but also on the possibility of agrarians to receive working capital. on this depends the importance of filling the state budget with foreign currency . - the conference of ambassador vasyl bodnar of ukraine in turkey on june 3, literal public russia brazenly and unprecedentedly steals ukrainian grain and exports it from the occupied crimea to foreign countries, including to turkey, we appealed to the turkish side with a request to help us in solving this problem . isn't this translated from the diplomatic point of view as

turkey is also engaged in assistance ? we also read the comment of this mr. ambassador. he said that reuters published his words incorrectly and gave the headline, then the headline was gone. that's why you know i will not undertake the mission to protect the ambassadors. but nevertheless, this does not remove the situation that grain is really stolen in ukraine, that the world buys this grain , in particular, and it is sold in syria. for us, this is also a problem today, that syria can actually become such an agricultural hub that will receive stolen ukrainian grain, which according to the documents will be russian and it can continue to move even in the third countries of the world, in particular, we know that there was a recent meeting between the representative of the african union and the president of the occupiers, where putin frankly said that he