there, we need to save putin's face, we need to somehow end this war there, weapons do not help to solve this conflict, such theses are being heard, and is it possible in principle? he still wants to continue collecting lands, i will time the next victory there, either to the day of russia or to the day of the beginning of the great patriotic war, in their opinion, or the second, not the second world war, a great national on the one hand, they want to end it, on the other hand, he makes his plans what he wants to continue the war here. you know, there is no contradiction here from the point of view of russia, because there is a message that goes outside, that is, to the european

world community, and a message that sounds for the internal consumption for the russian society itself, and i repeat once again, in no way does russia stop its aggressive intentions to invade ukraine, and it is quite obvious that they are trying to gain a foothold and achieve certain results by the end of this year so that to announce the restoration of the soviet union well, without about december 30th, which can be very disruptive and so it will be the supply of weapons, there is a big question mark here. maybe even three, and we would like to talk about this, too. because this is a very important issue regarding our further victory of the united states for example , they continue to provide ukraine with an incredible amount of weapons both at the level of the budget and separately taken programs, which are approved by the congress every time, but we need much more weapons and we have to use them for their intended purpose

earlier, in an interview with the times, the american president said that the united states will continue to help ukraine , will provide missile systems and ammunition, but will neither prolong the war nor pressure kyiv to make concessions to russia, but once again emphasized that american soldiers will not participate in the war. well, for now, the united states or our allies will not be attacked we will not directly participate in this conflict by sending american troops to fight in ukraine or by attacking russian forces we will not encourage or allow ukraine to strikes beyond its borders. we do not want to prolong the war just to cause pain to russia. meanwhile, the new us ambassador to ukraine bridget breen said that the command of the armed forces of ukraine will independently make decisions about the range of strikes from the heimers facilities, which the us plans to transfer in the near future . hey let's hear ms. brin, the us government signed

an act on the provision of a package of armed assistance to ukraine worth 700 million dollars, this package also included heimers artillery installations, first of all, their provision should help ukraine to achieve greater accuracy in hitting enemy targets, but also to get artillery weapons with a longer range than is available now, the question of the distance of strikes will be solved by the armed forces of ukraine independently, they help different countries in different ways, someone thinks that weapons are given to ukraine by the teaspoon. and i will remind you that only poland has already supplied us with 2 billion dollars worth of weapons, including bmp tanks and shells of controversial youth, did the head of the foreign ministry of turkey or ushugluya already mention him today, he is sure that the supply of weapons to ukraine cannot be stopped it is impossible to achieve a war of quick victories, and the use of force between moscow and kyiv has led to a trend towards dialogue. ankara once again emphasizes that it will not join any sanctions, because sanctions only

harm olashoval germany, estimating the supply to ukraine at 100,000 tons, weigh weapons although there is a lot of help from the bundeswehr questions, and this is despite the fact that the world is convinced of a long-term war, mr. sergiu, the question is today, here it is by the way . information, you are a separate priority, the representative of the german government today stated that the position is that germany will help with weapons, i want a large amount of weapons, which we have not seen from there, but this issue is not resolved overnight , such a wording was and let's remember how much we asked for until february 24, during these more than 100 days, germany will provide us with heavy weapons, and it turns out that everything will not be

solved overnight. night, such a question is not resolved, and germany, in fact , using democratic procedures that are not extremely fast, very slowly makes a decision regarding the transfer of military equipment to us, but the process continues and it must be understood that germany is still starting the transfer, because our artillerymen are already learning to master e german 155 mm howitzer and other types of weapons i would like well, not that for the defense of germany, but still, for the sake of objectivity, let's say that let's understand that germany is a country that well, no was preparing for the war and german society after , well, let's be frank, the victory in the cold war, hoped that the war would be forever gone from this, from the history of our existence with you, and uh,

again, well, having contacts in germany, i can say that uh, they transferred to preservation of weapons technology, and germany did not pay attention only to the development of this particular weapon technology, therefore, even in order to bring the existing weapons into a combat-ready form, time is needed, time, finances, opportunities and resources, and this is what can be connected, including the delay of the equipment, mr. serhiy, at the same time, well, i'm just saying that it would be possible to start solving these issues and facilitate the supply of heavy weapons to us a little earlier , the truth is, i'm just saying that for my needs , for example, the tulashon has already promised 100 billion euros for the defense capability and development of its army, yes, and they are spheres. but if we talk about the supply of weapons, well, they promised us cheetahs, what else are there, ayres, that means mars, yes, it will all be possible sometime before the end of the year, what do we have with hummers, which we just mentioned

well, it seems that we are talking about four systems of volley fire, but as the experts say, your colleagues, we don't need 4:40. and you all say that the president says that we need from 150 to 300 such systems to have an advantage on the front. and what can and when it will happen from- with whose help, well, remember britain. perhaps there will be a visit by the head of the british ministry of defense. who and what will help so that it is a little faster than we plan. and you know, here we must note such a thing that for us himer is still such a fairly new type of weapon that has never not was used in the armed forces of ukraine, and those four banu launchers, you know, are such a first test step so that the armed forces of ukraine will also realize that they will use these weapons in some way for us. is extremely important and its

arrival can really change the course of the war, but the very philosophy of the confrontation on the battlefield. and how much of it can fit? well, you need to understand what kind of weaponry it is. and it is not only for the united states, but for other countries, it is not it is definitely new, but it is effective , it can work. and how quickly the ukrainian troops, the ukrainian military, learn to use it effectively will depend on how quickly all the weapons will come to us and in what quantities, that is, if we prove that we are able to cope with these weapons it will go on a larger and larger scale, especially since it was announced by the united states, these parties will only increase, because the lend-lease law allows to speed up such deliveries. therefore, they they left, they are already coming to us, we are working with them

, and a clear example is the same m-77 howitzers on the front , now they are used up to 911 degrees, the 110s that have already been provided and the howitzers continue to be supplied to our weapons . we mentioned to the leaders from turkey just now that weapons will not help ukraine to win. well, for example, such a thesis, yes. and how does it correlate with the fact that we are winning by a large margin, we are already there 20 km from kherson, we are counterattacking in the south, in the east of severodonetsk half under the control of the armed forces of ukraine and it is still unclear where the occupiers will end up there in the coming days and weeks . yes, it is difficult for us to have large losses, they are already talking about it in the president's office, but even despite the fact that we have one to 15, as the military claims in terms of artillery and shells, yes, we have one projectile is fired a from that side 15 we are still winning

, but does the weapon a-a solve the issue or are there possibly some other factors, the main factor is the will to resist and uh, we see the example of afghanistan, which was simply stuffed with american weapons and the taliban, who were armed with fairly primitive weapons, roughly speaking, from the middle of the last century, entered kabul literally in a couple of weeks, instead, here we have a reprimand for a different situation and, of course, weapons never completely solve all matters, instead, here we have the will to resistance, the will to victory, and actually this will to victory and our resistance have already proven that we need these weapons, and this is the main factor that allows us to win despite the numerical emphasizes the numerical advantages of the enemy

well, in the end, i would like to quote mr. stountenberg, the head of nato, and you will formulate your opinion, but if possible, ask you briefly. ukraine needs to prepare for a protracted war, but we will do everything to help ukraine, and we must do everything to prevent this war from the confrontation between nato and the russian federation ah ah i wanted serhiy grabskyi to comment on this statement but i see that it is already valentine smooth eh i congratulate us good evening to you good evening well then let's welcome to the previous topic i wanted to address this question to mr. hrabsky, yes , stoltenberg is sure that ukraine should prepare for a protracted war. our next topic , which i would like to discuss with you, is integration, after all, it is difficult, but i am sure. yes, there is a senate, and

here is your protracted war . position. yes, it requires detailing. the very term protracted war. of course, if the russians wanted to capture kyiv and end this war in three days, then a protracted war is already underway . the french throne, well, 100 years, if there was a seven-year war with a 30-year war, well, in the end , this war actually lasts for eight years, that is, it ’s simple. where do we start the countdown of this war, therefore, the only way to shorten this war with e-e, and the president of ukraine correctly says this to give the opportunity or to give the opportunity to the ukrainian armed forces to get theo-armament that will allow the armed forces of ukraine to very quickly knock out this russian scumbag from our territory and then the war

will be quite quick and will end significantly it is faster if you drag out the satisfaction of giving and how do some european leaders do it, yes, that is, delaying the supply of weapons, delaying the approval of certain sanctions. well, it is clear that this war can last in principle for an infinite long time . in general, the war can have an endless nature, so i would say yes, ukraine must be ready for any scenario of the course of this war, and in the end we have no choice, that is, we we will fight as long as it is necessary, or exactly as much, then you will be alive and have the strength to fight, valentine, it is simple, namely, the war slows down the process of integration into the euro community into nato, as i mentioned, and it slows down, but at the same time, you know i would

outline this subtopic so that the euro community, well, in some places, is not against our movement yes to the european union, to nato, but it also slows down in a good way, and this is also about it here. we will now focus our attention, because three countries of the european union are against granting ukraine candidate for membership, the prime minister for european and euro-atlantic integration, olga stefanishyna, stated this during her visit to brussels. well, she refused to name these countries. she believes that this may harm the adoption of a final decision, but emphasized that if the status of a candidate for membership in ukraine is not granted, it will weaken the european union itself, a total of approximately 7 countries of the european union, these are not eastern european and non-baltic countries. as you can imagine, they expressed proposals for some other format, offering extra candidacy or conditional candidacy, there were many different proposals, but in fact there are three main countries that today do not want to give the green light to ukraine. we insist that

the decision to grant ukraine candidate status is only the beginning of the process and one should not spend all one 's political skepticism and capital on confrontation this is the beginning of the process, this is a chance that ukraine will either use or not use. at the same time, ursula fondolyan, the head of the european commission , notes that ukraine will not be given a simplified option. accession to the eu, the eu must support ukraine's entry into the bloc while maintaining compliance with all standards and requirements, but how fast, how fast , it depends on the country itself and our support depends on us, how much we support, invest, and in the hands of our ukrainian friends, what they are with they do this, we state that ukrainians are fighting so bravely because they know exactly what kind of future they want , the future of a free and open society that belongs to a joint-democratic community, they want to join the eu, we have heard it again and again,

i believe that this is not only our strategic interest, but our moral duty, to whom to enable their membership, to pave the way for them to our union of the same opinion and analend bervok, the minister of foreign affairs of germany, this is a historic moment, we we cannot close the door in the face of ukraine, but there will be no quick entry and kyiv will not have discounts, the commission should praise the final decision on the status of the candidate in june by the way, chernivtsi, a fruitful month for ukraine here and the meeting in madrid, in particular, as for you opinion well, first of all, let's take a trip, in your opinion , there are such contradictions in these three countries. well, in principle, which we know, but we will not name them yet, yes, as ms. stefanishina asked. it may somehow affect our integration. first of all, i would like to say to you, mr. nazare pointed out that the war slows down our euro-atlantic aspirations, i would look at this problem, otherwise it may even accelerate them,

because before the war, all these european capitals and leaders were quite skeptical and considered, in principle, the possibility of ukraine acquiring full membership of the eu to date, this prospect is much more realistic, that is, and frankly speaking, i am inclined to think that ukraine will receive the status of this candidate. well, i agree with what some european politicians say about this aspect. homework and its part regarding the coordination, well, the gateways, relatively speaking, we understand that at the moment, that is, the situation in ukraine is economic and legal, but it is fundamentally different from the situation in many the european labor market is the same, well, there are a lot of problems. i am constantly asked what it is about. i always give the example of bulgaria and romania, which, having acquired full membership in the

european union, nevertheless still had certain restrictions, for example, on the movement of labor. well, i also i want to say that there are some states in the european union that have kept their own monetary policy and have not yet switched to the euro, so that is also the case with the elements of integration. moreover, ukrainians tend to equate the concept of the european union with the schengen zone, in fact, these are not identical concepts, for a long time there were countries that were part of the european union but were not part of the schengen area. well, why? well, because it was also connected with certain purely administrative points, and i tend to think that ukraine is most likely to receive the status of the candidate, because this political decision is correct , said the minister, the minister of foreign affairs of germany, that is, it is true . then i tend to think that this can really lead to very complex and unpleasant processes in europe itself

, sir, because i think that the poles and some of the test of ukraine will react very painfully to such a eurosceptic and zelensky, it’s been a few days against your words, on the one hand, yes it is as if well, we have such a complex vision and desire to embrace the european union, yes, but on the other hand, if you analyze each country specifically, well, remember that macron is not going to ukraine, but to golda, for example, yes , as a variant of olefsholtz, he is the successor there the politicians of the dead although they are representatives of different political forces, it is unlikely that anything will promote ukraine in the european community mario draghi says that you are the prime minister of italy at all, that only italy previously stated this, at least that only italy wants to see you in the european union, the netherlands, even despite the fact that he was in mh17 history, in translation, means that divorce is not a solution. well, it is necessary to understand that the european union is heterogeneous. or did i say

about this, mrs. merkel? their mercantile national interests, but it is necessary to understand that the termination of the existence of the european union will put much more serious problems on the agenda among all its current members. well, that's why each of these subjects, as a matter of fact, today balances between his fears about the european union and his role in the european union and after the accession of ukraine to the potential accession of ukraine, this is one scenario and another scenario that they should consider, what will happen to the european union if the european union will not reach an agreement on the future of european ukraine, what will be the reaction of the various european unions to such a political decision, and will the european union as a result end up facing the threat of further stagnation, and in the future, collapse? well, that's why i

started talking the words that we today, well , the president of ukraine zelensky spoke. he said that we will not agree to any surrogates, well, you understand the point, we do not need to offer any alternatives to the european union, but the problem is that the european union can really turn itself into such surrogates. well, when, for example, the same, as i already said, the higher countries, e. the opinion is not taken into account enough what is it that their interests are neglected here yes what is there some old europe well, i have lost a little sense of reality, i want to live in some kind of comfortable past, which today no longer exists and maybe on european. well, in this european continent , some different blocs may once again form . both military-political and economic blocs. let

's look at the story with brad. look , i just want to draw the attention of ukrainians . oh, and the british are idiots. they voted wrongly, they actually killed themselves in the coffin from the inside. now britain has no future. look at the situation with britain and ukraine in the current situation. it turns out that just britain, which left the european union, turned out to be a much more powerful and independent player than anyone could ask for, and therefore europeans, damned europeans, are used to a comfortable past, but europeans still do not understand. and that the comfortable present is only thanks to ukraine and what is happening on our territory, thank you to you for the opportunity to join join our broadcast valentin glykh was just with us political scientist the only news together we are strong will support the ukrainian army with money scan

the code well and finally we have one more topic practically i would describe it as ours there, well there, that is, in different countries in different cities. it doesn't matter whether our compatriots left after february 24 or earlier, but still, let's remember at the beginning about what, for example, britain we just discussed with valentin one of the first in the ranking of ukraine, which helps ukraine and ukrainians, but next to britain, other countries of western eastern northern europe, as well as the usa, canada, japan, australia, let's remember poland, in particular, from the beginning of the large-scale invasion of the russian federation into ukraine has sheltered hundreds of thousands of ukrainians, the czech republic promotes employment portugal, france, germany allocate millions of euros to refugees from ukraine for their daily needs let's call the final part of this hour ours well, it is my pleasure to congratulate and add to the broadcast mariana shulga, a ukrainian woman who lives in poland, marian congratulations to you congratulations to you ah, i know that

you left a little earlier than after the 24th, yes, you have already been there for several months, maybe even a year. of ukrainians to during the tpr a-a such a complex question, i’ll throw you a few at once a-a what help did our ukrainian diaspora get involved? your friends are acquaintances. what do you feel about the exodus of such people ? in general, the mood, well, in general, the mood, of course, before the full-scale war, and after that, there were different periods, and the poles really supported us, they helped us, then now, it was even unexpected that the poles would be yes to support ukrainians, because in the first days you

know that there was a mass exodus from ukraine to poland , volunteer movements were organized, including poles, our ukrainians, of course . what exactly did he help with, well, at first, of course, no one was interested, everyone went there for two days, two, three, maybe a week, everyone thought that it would end quickly and we would return to ukraine calmly, so people went just to save themselves from the war, food, shelter, their own, apartments stood out directly well, everything in the house, the poles took people and without any questions

. from ukraine, people who needed it, of course, i cannot accommodate many people, but yes, everyone helped as much as they could, but how even the leadership of the country reacted quickly to the situation in ukraine, to documents for payments, to help with, well, all the issues that are needed were quickly everything was given to that e-e sound- of course, this is very telling, who is a friend for us , and who is really a partner for us, and who does not give much, and who is maryana in general, but is there enough information ? nowadays, where do they get information from? well, here, every day, hourly, there is

information about the situation in ukraine , ah, on the radio, on television, it is always the number one topic, so there is enough information for me personally, so i usually watch it, too. is ukrainian television, youtube channels, there are a lot of them. we have the opportunity to find information, so there are absolutely no problems with this, and the information is covered here, by the way, the information is correct. well, true, true, objectively, in fact, literally a few sentences, no matter what, it’s good abroad you would probably advise it anyway i understand that you need to return home and rebuild your country, i will tell you more, everyone who came is just waiting for an opportunity to return to ukraine

my sister personally, i refuse her for now to return because she has three children and i ask her to wait a little, but all of my acquaintances are actually ready to return . homeland and are counting the days to return home after all. maryana shulga ukrainka, who lives in poland, was just in touch with us. the return from abroad of ukrainian temporary migrants belonging to the dps demchenko notes that since february 24, almost 7 million people have crossed the state border of ukraine, of which 4 million 600,000 were registered to leave ukraine, most of them our compatriots, during this time almost 2 million ukrainians followed ukraine and as of now, the total passenger flow per day in

both directions is 80-85,000 people, that is, there is a dynamic and a significant increase since may, the border guards record daily the preference of entering ukraine over leaving, and this may indicate that ukrainians they are beginning to actively return home, which actually can't help but be happy, friends, this is all ukraine, ukrainians are integrating into europe and the whole civilized world . we are told that it is not the time, we have decided to wash up, we are drawn to home and we do not know our own homes

, but we will eat new nests and create comfort, thank our armed forces, glory to ukraine, we will live on, we will think of our country, because our home is always in we ourselves will be intercepted we will outplay we will win that you are not news together we are strong glory