at international charity concerts, we return our history and help those who will build our future. our culture will live. ukraine will live. this will be ukraine. glory to ukraine. the blitzkrieg of the russians in the north was the first to face - it was a reconnaissance that failed thanks to such fearless soldiers. we took up the defense on the road as border guard vyacheslav call sign the legate of his unit took part in the heroic defense and liberation of the sumy region , flew to the muscovites with a considerable force, orcs who were sitting on these bters and bmws, they were destroyed column by column, this well done guys, they tried, glory to the heroes, glory to ukraine, for the hand of a warship. i offer my crowns,

русский язык, ships of ukraine do not love love yet, it is necessary. i am the

only news in the world, together we are strong, support the ukrainian army with money, scan the code, we united for the sake of truth, every day, every minute, the only news, the only news on the front line of the information front and everyone in the capital's new microdistrict from the sounds of the air

raid warning shots, we risk feligs for half an hour, the occupiers hit the kyiv tv tower with rockets, we care when you go on the air, you understand there many people very much and everyone really needs to hear we are uniting one hundred percent unification of the people it was thanks to ukrainian journalists that we are winning ukrainians we are cool we are one more to victory the marathon continues united news united news united news united news together we are the strength united news watch further always with to you good night glory to ukraine this is a marathon the only news and the next few hours the public relations team will work for you well we are talking traditional about the events of the russian-ukrainian war we are

analyzing the latest statements we are analyzing the latest facts the latest events about all this in the next few hours in russia, for example, they talked about the end of the war by the end of the year, for example, a member of the state duma said so, and there, uh, delimkhanov, uh, this forecast was commented on by putin's spokesman piskov. is it true that he was so vague, or artem, this comment uh- he said that the task of defining the implementation would mean the end of special operations, well, in a word, no specifics, why did putin, who so eloquently declared that he would take over our country in a few days, now took a course for a protracted war about it let's talk with the program director of the fly the world institute, oleksandr e solontaen, we'll add him to our broadcast, oleksandr, good night, glory to you, ukraine, glory to the heroes, well, look, we ourselves are to blame from

putin's point of view, we are to blame for the fact that the war continues because we do not want to surrender we do n't want to, well, when we want to save ourselves, for sure , actually, as of today, they have such a situation that they are already ready to enter into some kind of peace treaty, but in order to record at least some kind of truce, but in order to to record the territories that they have captured at the moment. imagine this is such a terrible dream for us when they rub their hands and say that oh, a wonderful peace treaty, a wonderful truce. that is, we do not mean long-term peace, but simply to stop hostilities at the moment, for example, they leave behind everything captured and there are many years of negotiations about how they will withdraw the troops from there. well, you and i came to minsk alone and minsk-2 in our conditions is

means that the military operations will stop for today, they will even say well, look, we are now storming there in severodonetsk, we are storming lysychansk, we are stopping everything, we are stopping going there in the direction of sloviansk, we are stopping our military operations, but as of today, we are already here. it means that moscow took kherson oblast , took zaporizhzhia oblast, took part of kharkiv oblast, almost all of it to luhansk oblast, and it will remain that way for the foreseeable future. does ukrainian society agree with this? we have such a situation that even if we were to imagine that our two sides sit down at the negotiating table , there is no way that at this table it can be that moscow wants to capture these territories and capture this victory for itself, and therefore of course it is more than 120 m² , thousands of square kilometers, god, correct me if i

am wrong in the numbers, because mathematics is not my element, but it is less, but it is the sixth or fifth part of ukraine, well, it is more than the area of ​​most of the countries located in europe, that is, when we take the territory of occupied as of today, in which russian troops are located and teachers are starting to put on the maps of other countries of the european union, their half of their country is simply occupied and this is very, very correct, this is putin's, what he has now are peace talks in which hostilities stop and for the time of these peace talks and you and i went through the negotiations, that they are endless for him. we saw minsk once, we saw minsk-2. we saw the normandy format once . we know that for him this is an endless story, that is, he wants this situation, he wants such a peaceful negotiations and do we need them? in other words, in this situation, we are still too weak to sit down for peace

talks in which he talks about how he capitulates, how he retreats, how he runs, we are still too weak for this, but we are already too strong for that to refuse capitulation negotiations in which we give up a part of ukraine only in order to stop the spread of this gangrene of war to the rest of the regions of ukraine, moreover, you and i have already found ourselves in this situation when part of those regions where the war was spread ukrainian society is already thinking about reconstruction, it is already thinking about those communities, about those territories that need to be restored. well, just a couple of numbers to assess the scale of more than 1,000 rural and urban communities in the settlements of villages there with more than 1,000 already freed, that is, under de-occupation there are already more than 1,030 settlements, the numbers vary because everything depends on the operational situation, how to count the recently liberated several villages and towns in the kherson region

, and as of yesterday there was even a message about two liberated settlements in the east, attempts to liberate until the end all settlements in front of the city of kharkiv continue. that is , for a month and a half we have been in a regime where, on the one hand, we are losing certain settlements and liberating other settlements, this is already a completely different situation than it was at the beginning of this stage of hostilities as of today, we already have no combat operations in zhytomyr oblast, kyiv oblast, chernihiv oblast, sumy well, the border guards are shelling there, but there are no such military clashes, let's say the south east, and there really aren't any yet a little more, a little more, and all combat operations will be transferred with a mik. currently, as part of our military actions, the transfer of combat operations from the territory of the north of the kherson region to the depths in order to free the dnipropetrovsk region from artillery shelling is taking place. that is, you and i are witnesses of how a huge

number of communities where is occupied by the efforts of our armed forces and the efforts of our soldiers, and this greatly inspires our society and our people believe that we will be able to destroy the enemy and liberate this part of ukraine, if only there were weapons, if only we were ready for it the necessary resources and precisely in this context, if ukraine sat down for any negotiations as of today and these negotiations froze without the liberation of our territories, ukrainian society would perceive such negotiations as treason , so at any moment in the near future there could be negotiations, but only about how the russians are leaving ukraine, and as of today, they do not have an agreement on this, they may still imagine that they can seize ukraine and they are storming verodonetsk, then in in the near future, there are no opportunities for real negotiations, because we only need negotiations, as they still leave voluntarily, they need negotiations at which they

might be able to record what they captured. for us, this would be a betrayal of that. we forget about the summer and so it turns out where the end of the year comes from, where does it come from that it could be by the end of the year, but even if we were to talk about the end of the year, in fact, for us, for ukraine, it is important that we are all ukrainians, they are all for peace. why? we want why, but peace through victory because we liberated our territories, we liberated our communities why because if there is another way, another way of peace, then wherever we have already postponed war, war will eventually return. unfortunately , we have already learned this lesson with you. well, if we talk about these negotiations when russia is in a weak position for it, they are at all possible because, well , the bar of imperialism has already fallen quite low for putin, and there is a fog in front of his eyes, it is clear from the fact that

he already calls himself peter the first, although here you know, i really liked it at one of the protests somewhere abroad, someone wrote you are not peter the first, you are hitler ii well, but less so, under what conditions can russia sit down at the negotiating table on conditions that are unfavorable for itself, well, in quotes well, if we talk about these comparisons with peter the first are the best meme - it’s probably after all peter opened the window to europe and putin closed the window to europe aired out and that’s enough, that is, it’s about historical parallels in general, comparing himself to peter the first , he absolutely can hardly stand the comparison and here if we talk about this, here is a specific question about whether it is possible that russia sat down at the negotiating table in a weak position. this story may be such an intermediate moment when or whether they will sit down for a whole negotiation. it is difficult to say, but what such intermediate moments are. when this can happen will then he is the next one, this is a situation when our armed forces are already going on the

counteroffensive, but there is still a weakness in our soldiers in the amount of weapons at the pace that is happening in terms of when their army will be completely defeated, but at the same time, we understand what a high price we we pay for it, because we know that every day our defenders die, we know that every day a huge number of our people die in the defense, when we go on a counteroffensive, maybe even more people will die. this is a high price that we pay, and at this moment the russian army is already weakened to restrain where the counteroffensive is still strong enough to cause us a large number of murders of our people to kill our soldiers while retreating. and at this moment , negotiations on the withdrawal of russian troops from ukraine are possible according to the scheme as it happened in chernihivska in the sumy region near kyiv, but in some other combination, of course, because each case is unique, each and every part of it is unique

, but in order to preserve the remnants of the russian army, this can happen when we understand that on the one hand it is necessary to catch up with the enemy and ours to finish him off, and with on the other hand. for us, these are huge human losses, huge human lives and the opportunity to record that they themselves hm came out in diplomatic actions, this is the complexity of this moment when in ukraine it will be necessary to weigh all military, human, diplomatic informational economic resources the moment in time the geopolitical situation and the decision made for us whether we use this opportunity or not and what kind of process will we have at the exit why would it seem well that is a healthy answer then that exactly then we need to sit down for the purpose of negotiations unfortunately we know that this is russia and if it were in any other situation, we would say of course at this moment we will sit down to the negotiating table about how they leave ukraine, but there is one moment why it is possible only because you and i know that today russia is one will sign and tomorrow we will do something else, let's do a moment at

this moment when she will want these negotiations to keep the remnants of her army, then to build up meat on her again and again to throw her to kill against ukraine and for us there will be a big big question maybe it's better to finish maybe it's better no negotiations, but simply do not let this army out of ukraine, finish it off , destroy it so that no one wants to go here , even at the cost of high human losses in relation to ukraine, and you and i will think about this balance in society, which is more important for us to preserve human lives in the future and today to finish them off or still preserve the human lives that are now taking care of the opportunity for them to leave and then to get stronger so that if they climb a second time then at this moment we will finish them off we will see such a moment that you are asking about when will the question sit down whether or not to sit down at the negotiating table, as of today, there are no negotiations and in the near future they are unlikely to occur because, as of

today, ukrainian society dreams of one de-occupation of our occupied communities, among which and very huge communities and kupyansk kherson and berdyansk melitopol and mariupol and volnovakha energodar i can list the occupied communities for a long time unfortunately, the ukrainian society is the only thing in its opinion that it is different from 2014-15 no territorial services support to our armed forces support our soldiers work on the foreign front in order to get money and weapons and strengthen ukraine and free it from enemies about pro-russian troops after all and will there be at all? well, in theory, will putin count losses because, well, sometimes, well, this is my personal opinion, i get the impression that he is not informed of the real situation at the front. well, as an example of hitler, he, too, for a long time was given some reports that had nothing to do with the real situation on the at the front

, you understand the defeat of the army, this is a much bigger story than losses, it is obvious that there is little to say about human losses, that is, for putin, that 30,000 people will die here, that 130,000 people will die here, for putin, this is of relative importance when we are talking about ordinary er, soldier, we are talking about ordinary soldiers, even there about junior officers and so on. but as of today, there is a prospect of the defeat of putin's army in ukraine, the whole of russia, in the context of the fact that all machines will be destroyed, the entire air force will be killed, colonels, generals and officers will disappear - shot down by a professional commander who can control this machine, that is, we are talking about a complete and total defeat of the army, this is one of the factors. we must analyze what is happening. why did they leave kyiv? why did they leave? then chernigov was sad, one of the reasons is that there was a question of the complete total destruction of their army. even the leaders and

commanders professionally who passed the series and chechen companies, even they already died near kiev, our soldiers killed them with precision, now they are just starting take place in the south. look at how much good and positive news the armed forces bring us, not only about downed helicopters or about the personnel cleared, but how successful operations are taking place according to leaders at command posts that's what we're talking about, and this factor for putin, of course , factor because today, er, for putin and russia, the total defeat of their army in ukraine, so be it. thank you . we are still talking about the consequences of the russian attack on ukraine and which, unfortunately, affect not only ukraine, they affect the whole world , the un world food program, and i believe that 44 million people around the world are at risk of starvation

, this is because of problems with the delivery of ukrainian of grain that is blocked in the black sea ports after the beginning of the full-scale invasion of russia into ukraine, our state, for its part, is doing everything possible to unblock food by sea and is dynamically increasing the sale of food abroad in other ways, the first deputy minister of agrarian food policy of ukraine told the public about this taras vysotsky talked with him ihor shavrosh, we are listening, everyone supports the intention that it is necessary to restore the export of zard from ukraine, and from the point of view of ukraine, this is important and it is critically important for of international food security, and it is not permissible to cooperate with the russian federation as an aggressor in general and, moreover, in such a field, buying stolen grain taras good day thank you for agreeing to this interview, the un world food

program made a loud statement that 44 million people in the whole the world is threatened with starvation this is because there are problems with the delivery of ukrainian grain, which has been blocked in the black sea ports since the beginning of russia's full-scale aggression against ukraine what amounts of grain have been blocked now it is actually ukraine that was the leader in agricultural exports before the war, a few numbers, well, in 2021 , a total of all types of food was exported up to 90 million tons in many positions, it has been a supplier since february 24, the ports have been blocked, and the absolute majority of more than 90% of agricultural exports took place through ports as a result as of today, we still have about 20 two million tons

of agricultural products from the previous year's harvest available on the balance, which could be exported and delivered to countries that need them but 22 million tons remain inside our country. these are general economic products that could be exported by sea, as i understand it. in fact, this is the sum of the main crops that we still have large residues of wheat , corn, sunflower seeds and processing of sunflower seeds, sunflower oil, meal sunflower soybeans , this product is in the elevators, it is gradually being exported by alternative routes, but if the ports were working, it would already be exported in these three months, more than three months of the war, and was consumed in the countries that need it, because of this volume, it is the grain that was exported to the countries for the production of bread. grains make up about 2/3 of

this volume. the two main grain positions are corn, it is used more for feed, and wheat is used as food wheat. in fact, we have of the remnants of the previous year, about 5 million tons received a message that russian forces destroyed the second largest grain terminal in mykolaiv, with several tons of grain, they got rid of it physically from the point of view of the registers and at the beginning of the war, several hundreds of thousands of tons of grain were stored there, mainly wheat as a food product, corn, less soybeans and sunflowers, that is, we are talking about 250 prices, 300,000 tons of grain, who sees a way out of this situation, ukraine, the ukrainian government, and which of these options do you now voiced are more realistic, we are working in several directions at the same time, since the beginning of the

war, we have been actively engaged in the development of other logistical ways of delivery of ukrainian products in relation to them, e-e railway by transport and road freight transport through the countries of eastern europe, slovakia, hungary, poland, romania, the main volumes go through poland or romania, also by river transport through the danube river, we have access to the danube in the south of the odesa region, we have access to the danube in the south of the odesa region, and shipping is carried out via these alternative, let's say, routes there is significant progress, if classically, before the war , about 200,000 tons per month were sent by these routes, in march we already shipped 350,000 tons. in april , we had about 1 million tons, which is three times more than in in march, according to the results of may, they reached the figure of 1

million 750,000 tons, which is another 75% more. that is, this is a good trend. but again, these routes are much smaller in volume than the ports. the ports could easily send 5-6 million tons a month, so we understand that this everything is fine , now we are talking about 20% of the port capacity, we can reach 30%, therefore, in parallel , the state leadership is discussing with international organizations such as the un and other international partners about the search for ways to unblock and also restore ukrainian exports of agricultural products through ukrainian ports, you can tell in more detail about these ways that are currently being discussed because i will receive different messages, for example, turkey

plays a certain role in the issue of unblocking ukrainian ports, for that it was possible to export ukrainian grain and ukrainian agricultural products located there to those countries where did it settle before, which ways are more optimistic in the matter that they will be implemented in the near future, first of all, the most reliable way is to continue the development of others export routes other than ports and from the previous month such an initiative was launched together with the european commission solidarity routes where we are constantly working on improving the throughput opportunities through eastern europe what we are talking about exporting through ports practically in order for this to happen there are several critical security points that we understand that the safety of the ships of the people who work on these ships so relevant is critically important for this to happen, of course the

best solution is our victory and the end of the war must also have enough anti-ship weapons within the framework of the current war in order to be able to guarantee the protection of these civilian ships from the corresponding fortifications on the shores . negotiations are currently underway about this, the president noted that they are successful and that it will soon be possible to announce certain solutions as well it is important that within the framework of the ongoing war, that the civil court on entering and exiting should be protected directly in the water by this or that convoy military convoy from the point of view of a potential threat to it repelling this or that missile attack and also from the point of view of protection against potential mines that may be on the way. that is, it is a mandatory element, well, it is, or, accordingly, a military west within the framework of an ongoing war and convoy and anti-

ship weapons or the end of our war victory and, in principle, the return of pre-war times, to say that there will be some kind of horizon, a concrete solution , so far we cannot work on these processes directly with algorithms, we are working with international partners, and we hope that in the near future we will be able to already to prove clarity, there is still no final agreement in which they will believe that we understand that a simple statement of the russian federation is not enough because no one believes them, ukraine and international partners and ship owners understand that these are private ships, so companies, including companies, must understand that there are no risks in sending them before that, it is not necessary to announce certain corridors, we are working very actively on this, we hope that in the near future it will be possible to say that these measures have been achieved and will work. it is as follows, i would like to do it again to discuss the role of turkey in this matter

, because there were earlier reports that turkey and russia had reached certain agreements to ensure the export of ukrainian grain through the sea corridor, for example, from the odesa port, but without the participation of ukraine. volodymyr zelenskyi, the president of ukraine, stated that neither was not even invited to these negotiations. how is it that ukraine does not take part in the negotiations on the export of its own grain , the initiator of this is turkey, and as ukraine already responded to this, first of all, it is necessary for us to clearly record that this or that result that could be implemented must be achieved exclusively with the participation of ukraine, since it must be ukrainian exports from ukrainian territory and ukrainian products, precisely the confirmation that this achievement must be as the statement of ukraine or a joint statement with ukraine, others, all this is not a confirmed

one hundred percent result. therefore, it is from the point of view of the understanding of all the participants, we clearly say that there may be different news of the statement, but a guaranteed result. it must be confirmed and announced by ukraine. of course, there are many efforts by various partners to help. there are no reservations or problems in this. but again, even if something is discussed in one or another format without its approval with ukraine, it will not be implemented by us, including that is why the partners are actively trying to help, this is positive, but the partners are also informed that in the case of finding one or another tool, it must be communicated from ukraine and approved ukraine and then it can only be implemented. well, at the moment, really, according to the results of various negotiations, communicate, including with

ukraine, we are waiting for some decision from the point of view of the announcement, first of all, of ukraine, at what stage will ukraine be included in the negotiations that are currently being conducted between turkey and the russian federation, ukraine must be included exactly at the moment if there is any solution that none of the partners believe that it can be implemented and then the algorithm has already been discussed, that is, there are intentions, everyone supports the intentions about the fact that it is necessary to restore the export of grain from ukraine and from the point of view of ukraine - this is important and it is critically important for international food security, but in order for it to be implemented, steps must be prescribed