this will mean the defeat of the west, the loss of face with the west, no one will count on his reputation and promoted as the center of power, the bastion of democracy, such a different world order destroyed by russia and the west, there are no options other than to support ukraine and support it in such a way that it is not dangerous due to some scenarios which could be interpreted as russia's victory ms. osmolovska what do you think might lie in these so-called peaceful estruses, we know what lies there, i do not agree with volodymyr regarding his first of all, i just came back from europe and backstage, well, the trends are very uh, no, not optimistic. let's say that because, uh, if volodymyr thinks that it will mean an image

, say a price, a defeat for the west. well, unfortunately, they don't perceive it that way. it is more important for them today to avoid a food crisis that will provoke a new influx of migrants to europe, for them it is important to avoid the increase in energy prices because the winter season is approaching and they are already starting to get tired and do not know and even something about political sense to do with the victory of ukraine and this is serious makes us think and understand that now we need very massive campaigning companies inside those countries of the union that do not demonstrate this understanding of the great geopolitical that mr. volodymyr is talking about through the initiation of conducting such advocacy companies on level of the public because this is the tool that will actually be able to put pressure on the political leaders of these countries, so my assessment is that the risks are such that there are such risks and

regarding this italian plan well, first of all, it was for the proposed actually in the un and now these proposals are being discussed and we also know that there is a separate track for discussing security guarantees within the framework of the g7 countries with ukraine, this is what our president talked about, i want to put this big question there for today and some specific proposals why italy's plans are considered concessions because it demands or offers to sit down at the negotiating table with russia, what will we talk about, about x, the pokulians, about the fact that they will now have the kherson region as part of the russian federation, or about the 20% of the territory that russia currently controls, so the question at this moment already puts ukraine in a losing situation, then the second proposal directly concerns direct negotiations between ukraine and the russian federation regarding joint territories, again

we return to this first point about its relations common, the first key question has arisen and this actually makes us understand that any negotiations now with the russian federation are putting ukraine at a complete disadvantage situation and therefore, for normal negotiations, ukraine now needs to accumulate its negotiating power through victories on the fronts, and that is why the first priority with which the ukrainian e-e side addresses all our western partners is obtaining a sufficient number of weapons in order to change the balance of power on the battlefield is enough to come to negotiations with the russian federation in the categories not of the losing side but of the winning side. osmolov director of the institute of security of eastern europe thank you for the heated and fruitful discussion and we are moving on, we are moving on and it is difficult to talk about

today's day without recalling the events of eight years ago, eight years ago in the sky over the luhansk region, russian mercenaries shot down a ukrainian military plane il-76, we will remember without a chance for life exactly eight years ago in the sky over the luhansk region, russian mercenaries shot down a ukrainian military plane il-76, it was flying reinforcements for their comrades who heroically defended the resort, while the tourists shot at all 40 paratroopers and nine other crew members were killed by the anti-aircraft gun, the commander of the 3-sim plane and the 76th bely, who made the landing according to the testimony and uh-e expertise, he kept the plane like that until the end, stormed and steered in order to get out of this trap that he had torn veins in his hands, this case left many questions unanswered

, the culprits have not yet been punished, at first the investigators suspected viktor nazarov, it was he who was in charge of the operative headquarters of the ato in the east at the time and could have known about a possible terrorist attack, however, the flight allowed, due to negligence, the major general was given seven years in prison, but the cassation court overturned this decision in the conditions of hostilities, any commander at every level, at every level he does everything possible to ensure that he is, in fact, in absentia, all three igor plotnytskyi andriy patroshev oleksandr gureev received life imprisonment. however, the defendants were never apprehended. the il-76 tragedy before the full-scale invasion in february 2022 was considered one of the largest losses of this scale for the armed forces in the history of the independent there was no ukraine yet, our landing party went to heaven forever, we are returning to our live broadcast, a bright memory of those who died both eight years ago and during this phase of the terrible war, we will now

talk about domestic policy issues and not only include mr. andrii osadchuk, people's deputy in ukraine, we are waiting for ms. irina fris, the news arrived immediately. so to speak, we will not hide it from our tv viewers for a long time. the court banned muraev's party, so they took it and banned it today, june 14. the pro-russian party is banned and the court will further consider the issues of four more parties, in particular the cases concerning the party of two e-characters volodymyr saldo, who is currently serving the russians in the occupied kherson region, and natalya vitrenko, whom i think you ukrainians remember very well, the property of our party and all its branches according to by a court decision, it is transferred to the state, but this decision can still be appealed in the

supreme court. well, mr. andriy, you will probably react to begin with yes, it's very simple, better late than never. unfortunately, ukrainian democracy was wonderful a field for abuses. unfortunately, during the decade , the leaders of the political leaders of ukraine and the political establishment on the pechersky hills did not work out, so to speak, until the end. ukrainian interest was always a policy of some compromises or a certain tolerance towards one or another political forces that absolutely obviously worked in the interests of the russian federation for decades in rye, the kremlin just needs time. well, we understand that there. don’t take someone and with whom you disagree, especially there is the same windmill. she is not appeared yesterday in ukraine, they worked for one thing to destroy ukrainian statehood

, helping the russian federation in every possible way, both from the point of view of political influence and from the point of view of what is called soft power - such a soft influence on the cultural front in business, the champion for prohibiting the activity of any parties disappear, entire factions of the ukrainian parliament but does all this protect us from the creation of similar projects that will simply be called differently but in fact will do the same as in the past and in the future, everything depends on the quality of our leadership. it depends on the extent to which our leaders and leaders of the political parties of the parliament, the verkhovna rada, the cabinet of ministers will be devoted to the principles of the ukrainian legislation in terms of uh-uh there, playing along with the aggressor of some kind of russophilia is completely inadequate, and so is the ukrainian judicial system in in general, the system of our law enforcement agencies offers something to move on to little by little. especially since this topic should

, in my opinion, be brought up to date in connection with the nearest decision. we hope to receive the status of a candidate for the european union and so far e snakes, in particular, the rekartyozik reported that for ukraine and moldova this decision will most likely be positive , but with conditions. of course, very much in fact. hmm, wishes from the european union, well , the personnel package, for example, in our anti-corruption bodies, not the curtailment of the judicial reform . it is unfair that we sometimes forget to look inside our own, so to speak, our ukrainian boiler

. the liberation of our people in order to win you their mothers, er, russians from the territory of ukraine, we are fighting for the constitutional system, for the rule of law - this is democracy and our son, of course, there were and still are big problems , unfortunately, the last winds and the last eight years after it was not too easy for maidan to build democratic institutions, this is what i am talking about, and when we have been saying out loud for three years that a strong ukrainian state is possible only with him at the beginning of may. last year, he told us the same thing. we do not want from you are nothing extraordinary for homework judicial reform anti-corruption bodies border corporate governance it all repeats itself year after year but if we do not do this then we are fighting in vain because without this there will be no ukrainian democracy without this there will be no andriy, a wealthy ukrainian state, but

i wanted to ask you, you probably well understand the mechanisms of certain blocking of certain logical and normal solutions there. well, for example, why not take up and solve this issue, it does not require any additional resources, well, except for organizational and of good political will is blocked there, there is some kind of change in the leadership of these or other law enforcement agencies that sometimes deal with such difficult stories, so i don’t want to list them now by condition, but for example, no took place, so to speak , removing mr. portnov's companions from power, so to speak, and so on. so why not do this? well, you and i all perfectly understand that the specificity of the current ukrainian machine and ukrainian democracy is that all decisions or most decisions are made in one building on bank street and i really hope that volodymyr zelenskyi is now demonstrating very good leadership in matters of war, in matters

of defending the interests of ukraine on the world stage, he also understands that the future of ukraine is impossible without fulfilling these basic requirements of democracy without holding open contests and so on and so on therefore, now we are in fact very dependent on the power that we have, we have no other power and in the near future there will be no simultaneous elections or any it is impossible to hold elections in a state of war, so i really hope that the president's team is aware of their responsibility and understands that the very simple things that our allies are asking them to do and which actually correspond to pre-election promises and zelenskyi and his people. they will be implemented in the near future and i have a restrained optimism that it will be done. well, you know. i am more optimistic about president zelenskyi. no. regarding his team, the team is very different, different people, different

visions, different views, different biographies, etc. for example if olla was in draga and macron, that's something from draga and macron, yes, the president in zelenskyi, we would clearly outline a possible public road map of this. do you think he would present for its implementation, you know in me the feeling that there is not only a question in the company of these three honorable gentlemen whom you named. i think that this road map will be part of the decision that will be made regarding the status of the candidate of ukraine and we simply will have no other choice but to simply take it and do nothing extraordinary there the future of ukraine and the future of europe itself will depend on this, because without a democratic, strong ukraine, i think that the agreement to count on a strong europe in the coming decades is once again.

the parliament simply has no other choice in order to build ukraine and win this war, it is necessary to put aside all political personal interests and simply do the homework on building democratic institutions in ukraine, it would be good to delegate some areas to professionals accordingly. when the president still allows people to do their work professionally, i am talking about him now, in particular, about our commander-in-chief of the armed forces, we see the effectiveness and uh, this is a very important case, it shows how much the president really is then win and the whole government will win simply when the relevant structures and relevant institutions in our country are engaged in their field and are done qualitatively, but for this they need to be composed of really high-quality professionals and virtuous people, how broad is this concept, but it is very appropriate now, mr. andriy, yes, yes yes, these are all the basic principles of

democratic institutions, yes, selection, selection, transparent , open selection of officials in accordance with clear rules, and only this can ensure the functioning of the institution, the functioning of the state, i i really hope that zelensky is learning and it looks like he is learning, and again, i really hope that he draws conclusions from what he saw and that he understands well that you have not been embodied in certain personnel rotations, maybe his entourage , this seems to me to be very lacking andrii, if antin doesn't mind, i would still like to go back to the details of the problems that we have , so we don't have a head of sap. we see how they report on the successful cases of their work, but the leadership remains such a cornerstone in any discussions with our partners, secondly, the constitutional court of ukraine, in which status is he

now ? yes, it is not because they were er hmm focused on absolutely yes on completely different issues to what extent can this constitutional court be called legitimate in view of how its head was elected its head was elected and what is going on there in general two dozen he asks questions about things that are not the surface, and in fact, the fact that you are the surface is very important because it is very visible. believe me, there are dozens, maybe more, questions about the internal organization, both in the nabu and in the sap, and in the prosecutor's office system, and in general the whole system of law enforcement agencies has a huge number of problems, it is possible to work with them, they work like this, you just need to complete the competition, you should have started the competition, because now i am temporarily acting, conduct a

normal, adequate competition, appoint a professional an independent person, according to the constitutional court, in fact, we should be happy that a year ago we did not destroy the system of constitutional justice , we were very close to it, because on the one hand, we all had hatred for all these proteges of yanukovych a-a it was absolutely terrible but on the other hand, you have to follow the rules, and you could n't expel a stupid person there, you couldn't dissolve the constitutional court, the decisions of the verkhovna rada, as suggested by some hot heads, including those from civil society now, fortunately, the entire procedure was completed, and some of the odious judges left the constitutional court because their term expired, and accordingly, all the rotations took place more or less. well, not more or less, they took place. the only huge problem that remains is that the real one never happened. the reform of the constitutional court, because the

reform of the selection of candidates for the constitutional court has not yet taken place, unfortunately, the selection of candidates remains highly politicized than azov, the entire logic of the constitutional court is destroyed because it remains under political influence and is currently under the influence of the tank army, or should we try the constitutional court as part of the constitutional court? people who were appointed to positions that were purely technically not yet dismissed from their predecessors, as far as i remember, i won't name their names just now, we have announced competitions and selections to the chairs of the judges of the constitutional court, technically moments when these chairs were still occupied by predecessors, and that is why i am asking about the legitimacy of these processes. look, you are absolutely right, it was huge, but myself the constitutional court saved this situation because the newly appointed judges by zelenskyi were not sworn

in and accordingly we all waited , the constitutional court was waiting for the vacant seats to be vacated, that's why the procedure itself was absolutely terrible, huge mistakes were made, but it looks like the constitutional court itself was saving itself, those responsible were found there people, i don't know the same serhiy petrovich, i think he did a good job because he understands very well how important it is to keep the entire constitutional process within the framework of the constitution, but once again now the composition the constitutional court looks more or less normal, most of the people from there have already left. but the reform of the pension court was never carried out, so going back to what we started with, this is also part of the domestic basic task for the ukrainian authorities to build the basic institutions of democracy, because without a judicial systems, not courts, an integral part of the judicial system, we will have nothing in the future. therefore, it will have to be done in the coming

months. i agree with you, mr. andriy, but i am worried about another point, because from time to time people who are so to speak informally but connected to the government are starting to disperse various waves on the topic of the bad west of pro-russian europe, which is helping but not so much and is it not to the extent that we understand this problem, but at the same time i am getting a stronger impression that maybe we are also not too much are ready to implement specific criteria, because now we have what is politically or there an internal political freedman, and everything can be written off to the war, but the ombudsman, uh, denisu was removed in violation of the procedure , so to speak, everyone got a little excited there well, but they removed the constitutional court. i wanted to remind you. i think you know that story. the colossal battles in the european union are connected with the fact that in poland

the constitutional court began to be hacked against the constitution of the legislation and so on. this caused a huge resonance . grumbling about a bad event or not until the end of the good european union, sometimes there is a feeling that maybe it's not just that it's not a coincidence, well, first of all, it's important for the audience to understand that the story with the polish by the constitutional court, it continues and this is a huge problem for the european union and this is again an example of the fact that, to put it mildly, not all members of the european union - this is good standard democracy, even our closest ally poland has significant problems in the family and they right now they are trying to resolve them regarding er conversations er about the not so good event european union well , first of all i think that in the last month or a half days the voices have started to subside, they are not as loud as

they were maybe at the beginning of the year or at the beginning war at the same time, i think that we should all be categorically responsible and anyone who starts breeding this demagoguery should get his face straight from the spot briefly and immediately because we cannot afford any discussion and any tonality about the fact that some such an event, if it were not an event, if it were not for the union of ukraine, it would most likely have already lost this war, we are still fighting a courageous fight against the russian enigma, first of all, because we are not getting enough help for it, so it is needed much more, so we are working on it every day to increase this aid, but it is precisely the protection and side by side with us. which, in theory, should not be there at all, and these are all

challenges for us, and unfortunately, no one except the leaders is capable of solving these tasks, so our joint work is to grit our teeth and build ukrainian institutions and do everything it is possible to gently put pressure on president zelenskyi , on his closest entourage, on our western allies, so that the work is done. and those who prepare, those who create problems, even step aside or leave altogether and do not know how to dig gardens or anything at least to help the ukrainian soldiers on front it's just that not so long ago, khrystyna and i were somewhat shocked by the statement of one of the political experts who began to point out that european integration is not too much for us, so to speak, and would now be an effective mechanism because a candidate for membership of the european union is not the same as a member of the european court,

so to speak. does not contradict european integration does not contradict the deepening of cooperation in that triangle, but no, khrystyna and i were simply very, very surprised and i have fears that this is also some kind of a difficult task, we have to be very strong and brave now martial law martial law involves restrictions on the rights of human freedom and including restrictions on the information space uh, you know this very well, how are restrictions implemented in this regard, yes, to be honest, it is absolutely true, but uh, i i think that just such so-called experts who spread similar theses should simply be excluded from the marshmallow, because it causes direct damage to the national security interests of ukraine, full stop, and this, i think, is the task of the management of tv channels, this is the task of us

joy television radio broadcasting we have to be very attentive to our information space getting back to the point so we need to develop relations great britain is now the de facto leader of europe although there is no eurovision of the european union so we have completely different relations with poland and the baltic countries than conditionally there i don't know with france or portugal, but the european union is big and different, and our only goal is to become a member of the great european family, that we will have different relations with different eu members - this is absolutely naturally, this is how it is now in the european union itself, not too complicated internal relations, but once again, everyone who disperses any treason or any dissatisfaction with the idea of ​​european integration should simply be excluded from the airwaves for the time of martial law and not spent at all time to talk with him thank you thank you our main dear instruction is our beautiful ukrainian constitution in any unclear situation during peace or during war we read the constitution

thank you very much mr. andriy andriy osadchuk narodniy deputy of ukraine well, we are gradually completing ours, we can still allow ourselves to voice a few a-a news and in particular about how we continue in the territories controlled by the state of ukraine, as of today, to purge those who are possibly waiting for the russian peace or who cooperate with him in laboratories that is, uh, um, that means eight law enforcement officers , collaborators, face 15 years of imprisonment or life imprisonment with confiscation of property, notice from the state bureau of investigation, investigation established that in the melitopol district, one of the suspects, as a reward for cooperation with the russian federation, even headed the so-called people's militia created by the occupiers, the man is currently organizing illegal activities, in addition, the suspect was inclined to cooperate with the invaders of his former colleagues , it is very unfortunate that all this is happening

remotely, yes and without the opportunity to reach out to these people from dnipropetrovsk oblast in zelenodolsk , mirna chachenka died from shelling by the occupiers of the zelenodol community of dnipropetrovsk region a female resident died peacefully and her body was found this morning, it is about june 14, today near the country house, unfortunately, this is the third death from enemy hurricanes in the last week, according to the head of the military administration, the russian military is shelling the communities of the city, the communities of the region in the kryvyi rih and sinelnikov districts and in the chuguyiv district is just as restless, it is kharkiv region, and two children were injured there as a result of shelling. the private sector reported to the state emergency service within a day. the russian federation carried out shelling and shelling and 15 operational departures, our emergency personnel neutralized 27 enemy munitions. i don't know if

the news is good or bad at the end. so, they conducted a study in which they found out that almost half of the millionaires will leave our glorious state of ukraine due to the invasion of russia. so, dear fans , i don't know the bride there. millionaire brides are there looking for a millionaire there, sexism is not allowed at our webinar, i don't know for sure, yes, they say , well, unfortunately, we have to end our speech for today, we pass the floor to our wonderful news to iryna koval, who will announce the information release iryna, congratulations, i say war in ukraine to you, the main topic for ukrainians is victories and losses, analysis and forecasts, politics and geopolitics, serhii rudenko

and the guests of his program will talk about all this, people who have information and shape public opinion, people who defend ukraine and create the future right now the main and interesting thing in the program is the verdict serhiy rudenko from monday to thursday at 1:00 p.m. repeat at 9:30 p.m.