they are robbing us and unfortunately they are accumulating money and investing it in weapons and they continue to destroy us , it is necessary for the whole world to understand today that this state is an aggressor state, it has come to kill us and it has only one name, this is the genocide of the ukrainian people and the point of financing the occupier. unfortunately an unfortunate fact, vadim, about the looting of our land, also, i can’t help but ask you: grain, metal, what else are the occupiers trying to take out of mariupol ? - this is a ukrainian place because we are about development and for seven years we developed and made the modern city of mariupol, we developed a large project that was called support for such a very important project as

condominiums, and everyone who made such a decision created such a cozy yard there, we equipped children's playgrounds, a sports ground and where they survived, they did not see such a thing, they dig up these children's playgrounds, sports grounds, take them to the side of the so-called dpr to the city of donetsk and say that you are a gift from russia, where in schools there are still these interactive boards are left, they remove them and also take them to donetsk, they took our e-e trolleybuses that we purchased together with our european partners, we made a modern such and our own transport network in the city of mariupol european network 80% of all transports it was municipal transport - new the transport of the air conditioning system and they did not see this, they also took away not donetsk and say that it is also a gift from russia so that we understand, they enter the

apartment and take the switches because they also the girl who opened a barbershop in our mariupol did not see this, they twisted all the light bulbs, so you understand, they collect everything. they steal everything. what did russia bring to ukraine today, killings, looting and destruction? because it has only one sign, envy, because for eight years, when they occupied the flourishing city of donetsk in kupala, they did nothing at all. and today they see how our state of ukraine is flourishing like a light the city of mariupol and they came and destroyed it because they were jealous of our development, well, occupation is also treason, and you are also talking about this. by the way, we recently spoke, i want to thank you, mr.

vadim, and express my conviction certainty that all collaborators, all traitors, they will be held responsible for mariupol, as ukrainian president volodymyr zelenskyi noted in his address to the ukrainian people summarizing the results of the 110th day of russia's military aggression against ukraine, mariupol will be liberated for the third time we have no doubt about it. we thank you, mr. volodymyr, for joining our marathon about the information you gave us. vadym boychenko, the mayor of mariupol , joined the marathon. vadim's only news. all the best. only news. together we are strong and will support the ukrainian army . with money, scan the code, the conclusion of the european commission on the status of a candidate for ukraine is not yet

ready. previously, information about the opposite spread on the network, but the spokesman of the european commission, eric mamer, explained that the discussion of this issue is still ongoing before the final decision, there are still a number of steps, in particular , the finalization of documents, a meeting of the heads of departments and debates, however, the representatives of the low countries of the european union have already expressed their support for ukraine, in particular, and the vice president of the european commission, franz zimmermanz, emphasized that ukrainians protect european values, therefore the eu simply cannot deny ukraine the status of a candidate europe has to be the only countermeasure to russian aggression, because our state values ​​the lives of thousands of its citizens, protects not only its independence, but also the security of the west about such a during his speech and from the rostrum of the austrian parliament, the chairman of the supreme council, ruslan stefanchuk, said that he called on austria to join the reconstruction of ukraine and to support the decision regarding the country's candidacy to the european union. we

must do everything to make this decision a reality. i always say that every decision must be pragmatic aspect therefore, we should ask austrian businessmen in particular whether they want to open the 45 million market of ukraine for themselves, and i think that the answer will be unequivocal, but i also want to emphasize that we clearly understand that the status that we should get is only the status of a candidate, but it is a legal reference point from which we will continue to honestly tour our way to full membership, and now our broadcast is joined by valentin glynykh, a political scientist, valentiny,

i congratulate you. good night. eu candidate status for ukraine on june 17 well, i am optimistic about the results because, given the political situation, there is only one correct decision, in principle , in political decisions, it is very rare that when there is one right decision and the rest of the wrong ones usually have to be chosen with more alternatives. but this is not a ready case when alternative options will be detrimental to the future of the european union, the president of ukraine and zelenskyi absolutely rightly noted this. that is, it is not a question of the future of ukraine in the european union, it is a question of the european union if on today, the europeans will not be able to reach an agreement on ukraine's future application to the eu, well, this means that i think that serious processes will begin in the european union fragmentation and centrifugal processes because

i think that some countries of the european union are our staunchest supporters well, they are unlikely to put up with such a statement of the question and such a blatant disregard for their position on the part of well, the so -called old europe, they are inclined to think that after all wisdom european leaders will have enough wisdom and the issue of the candidate will be resolved positively, but already the processes of acquiring a full-fledged member will definitely take much more time, but unfortunately now we see that apart from we also have ardent supporters of the opposition in the european union, in your opinion, who are the main oppositionists on our path to european integration? well, i wouldn't even say oppositionist, i would say skeptics, well, that is, usually it's exactly the same forces and the same people who are actually the so-called eurosceptics

or who see the future of the european union as their native elite club, where outsiders are not allowed to enter. well, this differs in general from the current practice of the development of democracy, which should become more and more egalitarian and inclusive. i think that if this is a club of the states of the old europe, well, from which, strictly speaking, the european society began at one time, the states of the wealthy rich, respectively, who for some reason accept that all the other new members are some of them, you know, and i don't know there. are beggars who need only their help, they forget that this is far from the case and that every member state of the european union has brought something to this community. that is, it is not a one-way street and ukraine will also bring a lot to the future of the european union union, we do not go to the european union with an

outstretched hand, in principle, give us money because we are good to me today, and zelenskyi correctly stated this already in relation to the european union, but the meeting, yes, nato, well, what about today. strictly speaking, providing weapons to ukraine is an investment in own security well, the approval of this decision regarding the european future of ukraine is also a kind of investment in the future of europe, the european union well, this is one aspect and another aspect that cannot be dismissed from account, a certain part of the european elites are corrupt russian money, i mean corrupt, undefined is a legal a-a in the linguistic sense if you want, that is, they are divided or not with this money, they did not resist the temptation of this money well, and according to their will or not, but they are the leaders of

the russian vision in particular, that is, it is paradoxical that the european part of the european elites are the leaders of the russian vision of the future of the european union. i think that this is precisely absolute position and well, it is simply the height of short-sightedness and political, well, simply not pragmatic. well, we have already noticed that signals are being sent to us from brussels, or the european union wants certain guarantees that ukraine will continue reforms in the field of justice, or justice, in the fight against corruption, in your opinion, what else ukraine can do to convince skeptics of the need to support us. when i hear rhetoric about the fight against corruption, it all makes me smile. there are a lot of works devoted to, well, such a phenomenon as mafia state, well, the classic look is the russian federation, there is a well-known book by felchynsky. well, on

this topic, i recommend a huge read for those who want to understand what processes are taking place in russia and how they reached whom. well , there are, for example, many similar studies devoted to hungary for example, does anyone think that corruption, like bulgaria and romania, or the bulgarian-romanian economy was in a better state than the ukrainian economy ? until february 24, it is clear that now in force objective reasons, there are certain problems because of that well, it is not necessary to simply uh, how to say it so as not to offend anyone, profanity, yes, there is no need , criminal language is sticking out of the mask in russian jargon, yes, that is, it is difficult to translate into ukrainian, we are a culturally civilized nation, that is why we use to their conceptual apparatuses, that is not the point, ukraine has clearly and never refused, and it is in our interests to carry out reforms, it is not necessary for europeans to have a

fair trial in ukraine, it is not necessary for a european here is a normal inclusive system, well, an economic one. we ukrainians need this, and we are ukrainians. we are citizens of ukraine . you use this rhetoric in order to hinder us, that is, you want to help us carry out these reforms faster . this will necessarily lead to the transformation of the internal political situation in ukraine. there is also a lot of scientific literature about how and in which direction political regimes are transformed, and there the role of the environment is clearly defined, that is, those political regimes that are under the influence because in contact

with democratic political regimes they are much faster are evolving in the direction of building a normal democratic society, well, a legal state of social protection, you don't just have to play it, that is, you know who you will behave with you'll find yourself again, a russian saying, well , that is, if we have closer relations with the european union, then the reforms we had will take place much faster. it should also be understood that the transformation of hungary, bulgaria, romania, and even poland actually took place much faster and more effectively before joining the european union. already after that they found themselves in the structure of the european union, so i don't see any reason why it should be different with ukraine well, i agree that there are certain difficulties with adaptation there of the regulatory and legal framework of the economy - that's all, well, there are many other nuances of phytosanitary regulations, but you don't

need to do it well, it's uh, it's supposed to be insurmountable crowded, it's not an insurmountable obstacle, it's a task that must and can be solved, and the sooner we get a clear signal the attack on the european union will be faster and more effective, those problems will be solved both on our side and on the side of the european union, because i will repeat myself, the street is not a one-way street mr. valentin let 's talk about weapons, what do we have now with this is happening and why these deliveries are now happening more slowly than we would like well, i would highlight here both an objective factor and a subjective one, well , objective is generally the presence of one or another weapon in sufficient quantity, well, in the appropriate places, well, sufficient quantity and quality logistics infrastructure that allows these weapons to be delivered on time and safely to ukraine and directly to

the combat zone, it is necessary to understand that this is a problem, it is not just that you know there to take tomatoes and deliver them, although even with tomatoes, the truck may suffer some accidents, it is clear that when it is delivered from the mother of god, they are objects for, well, russian strikes. well, on the territory of ukraine, outside of ukraine, at least so far, they do not carry out such strikes, these are objective factors and, unfortunately, they are subjective factors, i.e. if with objective, well, it is very difficult to give advice somehow. well, if the weapon is or is not there or it needs to be repaired, repair requires spare parts, spare parts may no longer be available, that is, there are a lot of nuances, so here are the subjective factors that consist in the availability or lack of will well and the ability of certain political leaders to approve certain political decisions, this factor must be fought subjectively. well, zelenskyi is exactly that, and that is what i

am working on the most. and they do not only address these leaders directly, he also addresses the voters of these political leaders. well, on today it is necessary to understand that this is the part of the political elite of europe that i asked above as such, which is a little oriented towards the view of itself from the russian federation, it distinguishes itself from the mood of its society and it must constantly to make excuses, you understand that they are making excuses not even in front of us, that is, in front of us they could not have been sent, it is not special . why do their governments not provide ukrainians with the necessary weapons, the presence of which weapons will save, if not there, i don't know hundreds of thousands of lives, then tens of thousands of lives, and not only military personnel, but also civilians

population, so i think that precisely this subjective factor must be eliminated and all these leaders just have to come to terms with the fact that this step will have to be taken anyway and zelenskyy is not in vain announcing the number of losses in order not to there were illusions there in europe, both among our people and among political leaders, that supposedly this war is worth nothing to us, we are for the right now to have this conversation for the right in general well, to be a state and to preserve well, i do not know the very identity and identity, well, everyone day we pay very dearly the price of the lives of our fellow citizens, what is more, we emphasize both military personnel and civilians, and this payment is this, i don't know, uh, i don't know , this sea monster is devouring this tribute , in particular, because someone there is afraid of something, let's

invent something there absolutely do not criticize the wording that we will strike russia there, listen to us, let us understand that territory of ours that is currently occupied by russia, and not think about how we will strike in vladivostok, because it is real a sophisticated beacon, although for the sake of justice it must be said well, they have already clearly articulated their position, in particular in america, that the targets that carry out strikes, well, on ukrainian territory, being on the territory of russia, as well as legitimate objects, well, for retaliatory strikes. at least to ensure some kind of parity of fire support, at least in some areas of the front. therefore, we need to work on this and not invent any illusions that let's not give weapons to ukraine, then the war will stop very quickly and what kind of weapons are we currently asking and demanding from the allies and how can they change the course

of the war? i am not a military expert, so i am not ready to give the tactical and technical characteristics of various types of weapons, i can only say what is officially about it. the ukrainian government says, i think that it receives its information from the military, from the general staff, it is primarily about artillery, it is also about high-precision weapons well, because in fact, high-precision weapons are precisely what will allow to minimize casualties among, in particular, civilians population, by the way, we forgot a little about the rhetoric of the first days of the war, do you remember how much effort was spent by the ukrainian authorities to close the sky? well, allow us or give us the tools so that we can close the sky on our own, the sky above us was not closed, i understand the reasons and it is not right simple, but as far as i know, now the russian aviation does not feel so

comfortable in the ukrainian sky, what does this mean? it means that we received the tools that allow us to effectively solve this problem, and i emphasize that this led to the fact that ukrainian cities are no longer bombed as it was at the beginning of the war, so i think that this is just a vivid example of how by arming ukraine you can minimize the number of victims, so returning to your question there are three directions . the first direction is a more effective means of protection that will allow you to effectively counter the barbaric method of waging war on the part of the russian federation. the second is artillery. volley fire, well, this is long-range artillery. well, as i said above, this is a high-precision weapon. the only news is that together we are strong. we will support the ukrainian army with money. scan the code. oil strike on russia

. in the congress, where they presented an even tougher plan of retrections, how it will work, which was exactly the idea voiced in the american congress, our journalist colleague dmytro anopchenko is currently working with him and we will discuss everything with him directly communications from the us senate to dmytro, congratulations, congratulations , colleagues. well, you see, this is a famous location here, 17, where do these politicians go now, only me and the security, however . today, there were a lot of statements, a lot of even sensations, which i am ready to tell you about, dmytro. so, tell us in more detail what you actually offer the ministry of finance is here in the rehabilitation well, literally in the office behind my back and at will, the first deputy minister of finance of the united states is the person who is responsible precisely for the sanctions policy, he testified today in the framework of the senate

hearings in the finance committee well, indeed sensation. he announced that the united states is now working with european partners and will try to limit the price of russian oil. why is this important? i will explain. the official says that now despite the fact that everyone is refusing russian oil and volumes have fallen, russia's income is even more well, this is an unacceptable situation for the united states, that is why a plan is being developed, the official did not speak about it in detail, he said that it was closed information, even with the congressmen, he did not can share, however, what we heard is, well, you know, a huge step forward, they want to limit the price of oil in order to limit russia's income so that it can not spend this money on war dmitry. and in this case, how is the congressional plan different from the plan of the ministry of finance? and you know that tax on oil and to automatically transfer part of this tax to ukraine, that is, not only to hit russian

oil revenues, but also to help ukraine in the congress, there are many discussions now, you know that in the fall, there are elections in the fall, and this plays into the hands of ukraine everyone wants to show their voters that they are pro-ukrainian so that they are for ukraine. well, this is how these initiatives appear. i don't know how it will end, but what the ministry of finance says about - this is very serious, it is as serious as possible, dmitry. well, if we are talking about new sanctions against in russia, actually , are there any recent statements on this matter, well, there are statements, you can see them on the screen now, in addition to mine, there are also her hearings that just took place in the senate. here is this black man - this is the deputy minister of finance, and from him we heard today one more sensation he said that the americans have now joined their efforts with almost all european financial control structures in order to hunt for the money of russian officials, russian oligarchs and those who are currently on black lists more than what is now understood, the official of the ministry of finance admitted that the money that

is under sanctions, the russians even tried to invest here in the united states, you will be surprised , and buy real estate through front companies, all this was now quite difficult to find because the financial european and american structures from other countries did not share information, now they have united their bases. well, as the official of the ministry of finance said, they will announce a real hunt for dmytro, if we are talking about sanctions, then everyone understands that there are two sides to this coin, they work not only on the one hand, and in the context of this, i would like to inquire about the general situation with gasoline prices in the united states of america, what is happening with them and how, say, president biden's administration is trying to keep them afloat or generally regulate or reduce it if it happens well, you know there is an attempt to do

this, it is really a problem. this is really what they are openly talking about here, american officials are saying that america should and should pay the price for the sanctions for the fact that it started with a promotional policy, all of this understand well, the other day i heard from the minister of finance, she spoke, she said that we understood from the very beginning that this would be the case and that we would have to pay this price. well, this price is that the price of gasoline has risen very sharply. indeed, if i could by $50 to fill up the car with a full tank, now you have to pay 70 and 100, well, it really hits the pocket of every american, what is being done now by the american administration, they are constantly selling huge volumes of oil from strategic reserves. well, just today, 450 million barrels were sold. and what about it just happened today here in congress they want to introduce additional taxes on oil companies , everyone knows that those who trade gasoline with oil they have a lot of money and they want to use part of this money

for compensation so that people are not felt price increases regarding the meeting today in the pentagon in the pentagon today there was such an informal conversation by journalists according to the rules we cannot refer to sources we can just say what a high-ranking official of the us defense department told us, that is, ok, this high-ranking official of the us defense department just confirmed that first of all there will be more than 50 countries, that is, with each meeting, the number of countries increases secondly. and here we were told that several countries. we can not disclose the names yet because it should all be official, but several countries that have not yet provided weapons to ukraine will be included in this process. well, and the third, here is an important point . war, everything is focused on donbas, the attention of america,

the attention of the pentagon is focused on donbas, and the current stage of the war is an artillery war, and that is why ukraine, and it is already announced, they say informally so far, we will hear the results of rammstein formally receives artillery systems, this is exactly what kyiv is asking for and this is exactly what the american defense department is advising now, and another topic that worries the world besides oil is the food crisis , dmytro, headlines appeared in the press that president biden proposed new steps regarding the export of ukrainian grain what exactly is the american president proposing, you know a lot here faith at the beginning of the hour you tell me when to stop because there is a lot of information that i would like to share with you well now you see how the president biden gets out of the helicopter, he arrived in pennsylvania, this is already such a pre-election tour, uh, by and large, the president will meet and talk with people, and this is the speech you see

. he talked about the state of the american economy, about the main points, and one of the main points is that he just and mentioned the assistance of the united states in bringing out and exporting ukrainian grain, which is interesting for you and i. i think you and the experts talked a lot about the idea of ​​unblocking ukrainian ports. as far as i understand, the united states the states are not very enthusiastic about this because president biden said that the american plan is focused on exporting ukrainian grain by rail. well, you know what the problem is that the width of the ukrainian track is not the same as in europe , that is, a train that leaves the ukrainian portit and go somewhere to europe biden said today and it is absolutely news and you know well , it is sensational that the united states will finance the construction of huge granaries on the borders of ukraine. i understand that first of all in poland the ukrainian foreign exchange will be transshipped there, from there they will be transported by railways already in europe , that is, in principle, it seems that the

united states has found a solution. to the public and you see in such a keynote speech he just announced that there will be a plan, there will be assistance and there will be construction at the american expense of these granaries in order to help withdraw ukrainian grain ukrainian harvest colleagues well dmytro, thank you very much for this comprehensive information dmytro onovchenko our colleague from washington with the latest news from the united states our information watch continues further for your attention news from olena morozova anna gomonai and i will be back in 10 minutes we will convince you we will win and you still have no news, together we are strong unconquered cities of ukraine pavlograd industrial

center with a cossack past, the secret waterway of the zaporozhian cossacks ran through the wolf river here after the october coup, the unr army led by peter bolbochan drove the bolsheviks out of the city, albeit for only two years, the pavlograd anti-communist uprising became one of the largest in the 1930s, during the occupation, the invaders set up a concentration camp for prisoners of war and a ghetto in the city, where more than 2,000 jews were exterminated today pavlograd is under fire, but continues to help everyone who needs it, because pavlograd residents remember well that it is easier to drive the occupiers in a group - pavlograd - invincible