of states to participate in the gerasembly as early as last year, what will be the appointment of the head of sap, look, it is necessary to appoint members of the supreme council of justice, and this is also one of the points that western societies are worried about. if this structure is created but it does not work, well er, even those denials that we are currently at war er, they do not work, our constitutional court has also not been working for several years, they cannot determine its status, therefore, er, there are certain reasons for the concern of our western partners, and therefore the best best answer will not be an assurance that we have created this anti-corruption structure, but really its effective work even in war conditions. well, what is happening in europe itself? here is the latest information from the bloomberg publication,

how they support ukraine and the military and economically, german chancellor olafsholz blocked the nationalization of the former subsidiary of the russian energy giant gazprom germany, which is under the temporary management of the country's energy regulator , the publication notes that schultz is concerned about that such a decision might irritate russian president putin and lead to the termination of russian gas supplies. therefore, for now, the german government has decided to simply strengthen control over gazprom germany, the company that manages a large part of germany's gas storage and gas transportation system will be renamed to securing energy for your gmbh and the term the work of the foreign administration will be extended for an indefinite period e p maksym how do you generally evaluate the activity of scholz at the head of the government, is he for ukraine or against ukraine, the president also said

the president did not say that it is necessary for the president to decide who should decide either he is from ukraine and president zelenskyi or he is with ukraine or he is with russia, who is he playing for please, i will still be a small thing, i will add full yaroslavy what he said about the attitude towards ukraine in in europe, what you asked is what is happening there. i would like you to know how it can be compared to voting at eurovision. so when we see that there are some national commissions of countries casting their votes and then we see there conditional mood of the population who they support is true these are two different systems, just as in europe we see bureaucratic moments regarding how ukraine is perceived as corrupt, and here it is necessary to understand that on the one hand, about ukraine before the start of this war, well, we really didn't know much except for some things about the attempt to annex crimea from the militants of the so-called districts of separate donetsk and luhansk regions, because i have the word donbas

in principle in this context. possibilities by the way, the next thing should be a recommendation about the negotiations regarding the member statistics of how the country is a separate candidate status, then we will have to act to manage many things, so probably the one who sits in denmark and is interested in our constitutional court there, fills in the word stupid and reads stories and sees how it is possible with regard to germany scholze you know i personally apologize i will interrupt you with an apology i will quote zelensky verbatim what did he say tsdf he gave an interview and said otkarstva scholze what about us guarantees that germany supports ukraine are necessary. he and his government must make a decision . we should not try to balance between ukraine and relations with russia. i ask for your word as much as possible. you really have to remind yourself that this coalition consists of three pairs, with the last poll being precisely the social constitution, which the democrats criticize very much within the coalition and the green liberals

i will remind you that the three of them created real opposition to russia at different levels, even at the level of the federal states, but this is a classic question of the fronts of magdeburg, the front of the front, who cooperated with russian money for their own benefit and in relation to the shul. i want to, i forgot. by the way, that is, who said the idea was that when they say that shvets is a powerful politician, it's not true. he's just such a silent bureaucrat, so we remind you that in germany it 's something. although from another party and so on, so the line of stability is like this. weapons. they must be fulfilled .

the idea is to delay, not to fulfill, to hide, but we understand that in europe, well, everything is hidden. at some point, it becomes openly understood, and the passive of our president is also clear . of another political crisis in germany, because there was talk a few months ago that the issue of ukraine could destroy the coalition. by the way, even before the full-scale invasion, some voices were heard saying that well, if we are helping, then why and this is the issue of armaments regarding russia, you know, i don't, i can't wait. at what point will he understand that these are all efforts to save putin's face so as not to irritate him, so that something will happen to him? to play european politics, well, well, it is simply completely false, and this insight is happening, unfortunately, very slowly, too slowly for us and at a high price. unfortunately, we thank you for this discussion, messrs. yaroslav voitko, diplomat , international expert, and maksym yakovlev, head of the department of international relations, kyiv-mohyla women

thank you and we will continue to have one more discussion with people's deputies, and for now we will add information , the competition for a new brand that will be there has ended, there was a vote for several options for ukrainians mr. smilyanskyi, the head of ukrposhta, announced that in the competition for the best sketch of the new good evening ukraine postage stamp, the theme what do you think is the tractor theme where the tractor is driving a russian tank won? now we are waiting for a new stamp with the image of a tractor and tank, we will find that the first issued stamps with a russian warship that followed the given course created a stir, they were snapped up like hotcakes, so in these queues there were no very sharp watchmen, but british ones

the routers agency reports that the eu is concerned about the operation of western-made aircraft in russia without access to spare parts, the air safety agency reported that they are aware of cases of dismantling of some aircraft for the use of other aircraft in the russian federation , the main regulator of flight safety in europe expressed deep concern about safety summers of western production, which continue to be used in russia without access to spare parts and decent service, the russians lost the opportunity to replenish the stock of parts due to sanctions for the war against ukraine, the executive director of the aviation security agency, patrick key, told journalists on the sidelines of the conference that the russians have a very dangerous practice. he added that the regulators do not have reliable data on the large number of planes flying in the russian federation, or if there is data, they indicate about security problems, it is believed that the regulators could break through

exceptions to the provision of spare parts to russia if they prove the need to use this particular aircraft for humanitarian reasons, but then it does not have to become the norm, as he says again, good russians should fly on good, serviceable planes repaired in europe or with the help of european spare parts, ah, for an orgasm from yehor chichyrynd, we join our guests and rostislav pavlenko, people's deputy of ukraine rostislav, i congratulate you yuliya klymenko, people's deputy joins good health of ukraine mrs. yulia, good evening, good day, let's start with legal topics, what worries all ukrainian citizens. they informed us, well, these are general figures that every month we spend non-existent 5 billion dollars to obtain, that is, a hole in our

ukrainian budget of 5 billion dollars per month, if we count for a year - this is 60 billion dollars in hryvnias, i will not even multiply because this is a gastronomic amount, where to get money, mr. rostyslav at the present moment because it is somehow a monomic, and in order for the army to function, it also needs money, i am not saying that society, pensioners, low-income social strata of the population were also protected where take funds and what kind of amounts do you calculate for yourself, where should they be borrowed, please, first of all, they really said the word to borrow, it is obvious that this is a question of help, first of all, help from western partners, help from international monetary institutions , but it is also other financial institutions, but this also means that the economic policy itself should be aimed at the fact that any investment , any aid that comes in should be spent as transparently as possible so that there are

no questions or suspicions about it being untargeted the use of funds well, often such er, somewhat excessively aggressive positions are put towards international partners. they also do not contribute to the receipt of these funds er in full at the time most likely, that is, during the war, we know from the examples of other countries that help here is very important and therefore, what concerns lend-lease, because it is not limited to armed and armed supplies, and well, the marshall plan is the first post-war reconstruction, but even now , steps to support the ukrainian economy are extremely important and the last thing i would like here it is also very important to say how we set priorities in our budget, well, yulia can correct it. but it seems to me that there is still quite a large reserve for expenses related to

road construction, railways and the like, which could quite well be diverted to the needs of both defense and social support and support for the vital activity of the economy as a whole, there is business assistance, payments where businesses have suffered from hostilities and the like, so there is a more open position and more transparency regarding receiving western aid and the budgetary policy within the country is more understandable, ms. yulia, what awaits us yesterday, we talked about the fact that there are already problems with the payment of vacation pay, in particular for state employees, in particular for teachers, or whether pensions for retirees will also be waiting in line, because the money can simply be taken away please, let 's say it straight, the money has already run out and there are 5 billion dollars that are not enough every month. actually, what is it ?

we don't even have deputies, because we will ask the minister of finance again, but at the moment it is clear from the dollar exchange rate that the mission has taken place, that is, the military is making such military bonds ms. yulia isn't this a friend of money, it's a joke, it's the military bonds are one of the instruments of emission, as well as refis, as well as repurchases by state banks. and everything else, what instruments and missions are in one word, it’s all called printing money, not everyone knows that if money is printed, then it is devalued and for that's why prices are rising, inflation is happening, and part of the money that was printed is used to buy currency, so the dollar rate is also rising, we can see it every day, passing by exchange points, that's why, unfortunately, the mission is hidden there, let's say it happens because there is no other

option to fill the hole in the budget at the moment . unfortunately, there is no one because there are no big loans. no grants or loans . something was provided to international partners. for example, canada does not seem to have given 1.8 billion dollars. america has provided billions of dollars for us in this forty-billion-dollar package, but physically these funds have not yet all arrived. that's why we have what we have in order to pay pensions, we need to either print more money or borrow very expensively, as we have seen how it happens, the ministry of finance borrows very high interest rates eh unfortunately war eh these are the rules eh let’s say that we set them up, we can remember the second world war look at the economy of britain they only collected 20% through income taxes which were then spent on social and military of course, 60% was borrowed and 20% was a

mission. i think that the plus-minus is such a military economy, it will be in all the countries that are at war, unfortunately, all their funds . does not give money, especially for the war, we fight for our money, but that is why there is none, we understand it that way. that is, it is closed from today to today, we have to wait, it is quite chaotic because i want you even when we are talking about providing us with the numbers that we need, although would be until the month of september yes, let's plan or until the end of the year we are told that it is impossible to plan because the military situation is really changing and at some point we need to. -minus the military situation and it will be active hostilities and how much it will cost us, so we will insist there that the minister of finance and

the ruling party make the calculation by the end of the year and we soberly look at what we have and how much we need to borrow and that means then the deputies and everyone else must travel to all the capitals of the world and ask for funds so that we can economically survive this war because it is as dangerous an economic defeat as a military one. if we do not have money inside the country, we will not be able to to fight or to pay pensions at the moment, the situation is well, if there is a relatively stable pension there and social benefits are paid, but i agree with my colleague rostislav that spending and sequestration of the budget, that is, the reduction of the budget should not be on average chamber -15%, or -20° and some state articles and programs should be cut by 100%. because, for example, planting trees during the war, it is, to put it mildly , not relevant, yes, i don't remember how much there is, 100 or so million hryvnias. i read the news, it was like that, there should be such programs. unfortunately, all our citizens are closed with

understanding will come to this understanding that now the main effort we must direct to victory on the payment of social payments for the least protected and also everyone must work and pay taxes, otherwise we won't win this war, eh, yes, and in a year, western intelligence told us that there would be a full-scale war, they thought of billions of hryvnias for the roads, and now arestovych says that it's his fault because here er here here ukrainians are dying and nato does not take us and nato is also all to blame, let's talk about nato today, the headquarters is in the apartment and the ministers of defense of the leading countries are meeting, it seems that 50 countries are gathering there. here are the first statements from the press conference of the heads of state in the netherlands, denmark, portugal, poland romania latvia and belgium expressed a common belief that peace and security can return to europe only in the event of ukraine's victory and russia's resolution of the war. the

leaders of the seven countries made public statements at a press conference in gaza following the meeting with the nato secretary general. what are your predictions for today's the meetings in brussels will be about the new world security order, where is our place and whether solutions can be placed for us, mr. rostislav, well, this statement that was quoted is very important because it sounds again the word victory is not peace there at any price that ukraine has to pay. and this is the understanding that glass must be fought and the only way to overcome evil , to overcome racism, is to support ukraine so that it can defend itself militarily, regain its border and territorial integrity . therefore, this is a very important signal. the second very important signal was voiced yesterday by the ambassador of the united states to nato, ms. smith, who said that

the issue of providing heavy weapons will be discussed at the meeting. around this continue, but here it is very important that instead of a discussion of a really dark night, our diplomacy at all levels should work, because the statement, the more accusations, do not work, but the daily little is enough . in matters of relations with the eu and in economic matters , precisely because we concentrated on specific things and achieving specific results, that's why we really hope that there will be an answer to the question not only that and how it will be supplied and that about 50 countries have gathered today and each such meeting gathers a larger group of countries and shows that there is a readiness to support ukraine only the main thing is that this

readiness is realized again and again in very specific steps in a very specific number of artillery tanks of other weapons petro poroshenko the day before on our air on the joint espresso channel of radio liberty and the edition of the present time , er, commented on the situation and the economic military, he said that someone today thinks that we have already won. let's talk as we will to share the money that will come according to the plan of the marshal, the so -called i in my speeches and at the congress of the european union, everything and everything, then at the european financial congress, i called to concentrate today so that the polish lease legislation was adopted in each of the nato member countries, concentrate today so that ukraine received the full list of weapons that today we do not have the task of building something, restoring it, we will definitely do it, today the task is to break the spine of the aggressor with weapons and our armed forces to stop the war well, there he also said that it is interesting about nato, and

it must be done by the end of this year, just as we must obtain the status of a candidate country this year in the eu, that is to say, just as we must ensure an action plan for membership in nato. i am counting on this, said the fifth president in an interview with vitaly portnikova, mrs. yulia, are you counting on any progress regarding the pdc and nato this year, and your forecast regarding ukraine's candidacy for the status of retention of a candidate for the eu ? some countries against, everyone tells us arguments about er about other countries that have been there for 20 years and er are trying to get into the candidacy, but let 's say it like this, we have to fight for ourselves, i hope together we will still get this candidacy, what about nato i i think we need to focus on one thing: heavy weapons, and then start talking about nato and

everything else, because if we don't win, then it would be clear that we are unlikely to need nato. that's why we need it now from nato countries and not from nato heavy weapons heavy weapons in order to push back the russians not their territory clear our territory and unblock the ports which will also give us the opportunity to finance our economy and also feed africa and asia so this is what we should focus on should be one list for ground operations with heavy heavy weapons that we are asking for, and it should be what is called in england with polissi, that is, where everyone talks about the same thing. not everyone goes and asks for something different and ours international partners simply can't understand because of this, after all, what we need, and secondly, we need heavy weapons for the navy as important as for ground operations, because you

know that ports. for us, this is actually 60% of our currency revenues that russia is currently blocking. even if we win the ground operation, russia will continue to block the ports. if we do not have heavy weapons, including for naval operations, it is interesting to focus on one thing and ask everyone for the same thing. well it if i think what it is we will think about submissions to nato after the victory. another thing is what poroshenko says about the legislation on the unlease, which should be adopted in each of the nato member countries, that is, not only there are some general things so that each country understands what kind of weapons it should give to ukraine this is absolutely important, we see that in some moments when one of the partners is not ready to provide weapons and others can step in and close the necessary components, for example, when brazil was

ready to provide ammunition that was suspended there of other countries, therefore it is very important here that the western partners also act in unison, coordinating efforts . by the way, in the meeting on the so-called rammstein format, it is precisely focused on the coordination of practical steps, therefore, and when the participants are this and that, therefore, most of the events take place behind closed doors uh, that's why ukraine also plays a key principled role there, because uh, well, we hope that our representatives know exactly and formulate what exactly is needed, in what quantity, what quality, and at what time , and this is the legislation that the pro-analyst is talking about petro poroshenko, it will allow countries to adopt internal procedures for accelerated delivery , because very often we see that politicians make statements that they are ready to provide appropriate weapons through armaments, manufacturers say we are even ready

to get involved and do or modernize what we have there in the plans or not storage, and then bureaucratic procedures are included, which slow down all this, and then there is disappointment. well, on the front, unfortunately, this means human lives, and therefore it is very important that this legislation quarries within these countries and made it possible to better coordinate aid to the country, ms. yulia and what do you think about the establishment of our own defense production, are we not shifting too much responsibility to other countries for this and is it not wasting time, not wasting time to start something moving in this regard, let's consider two aspects. first, the defense complex is the only complex that can economically, the defense security complex, pull us out in the next few years, yes, 5-10 years. why? because firstly, we need to defend ourselves from our crazy neighbor, on the

one hand, we constantly need weapons, starting with cartridges and ending with missiles, and secondly, this is, actually, what can and will be interesting for investors, because now we are talking about what even if tomorrow the war will end, investors will rush to invest billions in ukraine. well, i would say yes. that is why the defense and security sector will be a priority for us for development. i think it should be a priority. it can attract investments and it can provide many workers. places and provide our country with independent independent weapons. we must understand that we are now 100% dependent on the supply of weapons from other countries, starting with cartridges and ending with i don't know gunpowder, and this unfortunately leads to an unstable situation with rostyslav said correctly, someone forgot the laser sights by accident, they didn't

find it, they didn't bring it. for us, it's all time and life for them , this bureaucracy, so let's say it directly, we need to raise this sector, er, can it be raised quickly? it's not possible, because many of our specialists have left, engineers, the average age is 80 plus, and a lot of technology has been lost during the last 20 years, but we need to start and we need to build, and we need to start now because, after the war, it must work stably . we still need this sector of the great , uh, there is a lot of defense in our neighborhood, we can’t go anywhere to defend ourselves there, it will be necessary constantly and we will need new weapons, yuriy, because the old soviet one. i think that during this war it will be 90% that even more will simply be destroyed or, well, morally it is already outdated, we bought 95% of the soviet equipment on the world markets, everything else that

was available, everything else is located on the territory of the russian federation, it is not physically there. even if we want to buy something tomorrow, it is practically not there. therefore, we need to focus on nato standards, learn and do not look at soviet weapons at all, there is no way for us to get there, we can only go forward to nato weapons, and in this way, integration into nato will take place like integration into the european union with the migration of six million to the european union do you understand, it is so natural, i would say european integration and naturalization , today mykhailo podolyak, adviser to the head of the president's office, wrote to himself on twitter, obviously addressing the participants of today's meeting of the rammstein club, where they will also discuss the provision of weapons to ukraine, the third meeting will be held today, he wrote the following ratio of russia-ukraine artillery in separate areas 10 to one front line 1,000 km every day receives a message from the defenders we hold on stand just say

when to expect weapons, a question mark, the questions are addressed to the participants of rammstein brussels, we are waiting for a decision, mr. rostyslav, how many of these messages from the adviser to the head of the office are correct? to the ukrainian audience to show well, we tried so hard, we tried so hard , but here i don't want to build any stories from the language, but it seems to me that it is better to put effort into working conversations with numbers and facts from challenges with international partners and to achieve a result there than with such rather emotional statements to turn the attention of ukrainian citizens by showing that the government is doing so much. so it made so many statements, that's why i still think that a higher coefficient of useful action would be directly from there is work in non-diplomatic fields

, i really hope that the team that actually went to this meeting will work with numbers , facts and proposals, and not with certain explanations for ukrainian voters, and by the way, who there by country and maybe someone else from the ministry of defense, but the main speaker from ukraine is mr. reznikov, in principle, this is logical, since the ministry of defense is responsible for building all the necessary weapons for the general staff. but again, you understand, there is a situation when a minister talks to his fellow ministers the political situation , because we all understand that in fact the budgets of armaments are approved by the parliamentarians of different countries, but they are not approved by the ministers of defense as well as by the ministers of finance, that is why political decisions, most of which pass through the parliaments of the respective countries, that is why it is very important

. the role of parliamentarians is also to convey to their colleagues what they need, because there is something that i see and encounter that it is possible that ministers know and parliamentarians do not fully understand in different countries that including the senators and the congress, what do we need, that's why we need to unite our efforts on all fronts, say the same thing in order to achieve something. of ukraine thank you for supporting the ukrainian view of the world yehor chicherin was with you for the last five minutes, five hours, and five minutes too anna, i'm melnyk ready to tell us everything that's happening in a few seconds , please wait and be with the press unconquered cities of ukraine pavlograd industrial center