the sea of ​​sex to go there, success actually flowed in support of such efforts to support and find ways to export grain in relation to nato's response. we understand that we are increasing our efforts in the framework of deterring the advancement of aggression and deploying defensive capabilities we seek to increase the presence of nato troops on the territory of all our allies, also taking into account the current situation in ukraine, double the presence of our troops on the territory of the allies. now we seek to further

increase the number of presence on the eastern flank combat presence, i expect efforts from our other allies to increase their efforts in this aspect. and the axis presence on the territory of estonia is expected to be doubled. the presence of american troops on the territory of europe has been increased - this is a powerful increase that is already happening, and on the basis of this, we will have a combination of other efforts, i.e. the increased presence of troops, especially in the western part, the presence of

weapons will be increased, because ukraine has expressed the need. and if the need to increase the ammunition of heavy weapons and if such systems anti-aircraft systems will be placed in the territories of our allies. this will be very important for strengthening the position, as well as sit down already specific groups of forces, special forces are already er sent for tasks in the territories of our er allies, in particular britain, and other er countries of ukraine's allies, these groups are already preparing years of ukraine, and we are also increasing our efforts within the framework of the land forces and the air forces of the naval forces, as well as within the framework of the cyber security of ukraine yes

but if we take into account the new threat from russia, will the strategic concept e izdevaem sensuge be somehow updated? will be the first step towards the full acceptance of these countries into nato, a big task to do many things at the same time so we will discuss a new strategic concept that will reflect the new

security reality, we have the current current the strategic concept that was developed in 2010. there we saw russia as a strategic partner, i remember attending this summit 10 years ago, of course, now we understand that everything has changed, that russia is no longer a strategic partner. now we see that a war has broken out and that is why we do not we are talking about china in general, therefore, at the summit in madrid, we will talk about the consequences of security in relation to china, the process of challenges, we will try to overcome them, we will

move in the direction of overcoming these challenges and we will find we will find a common denominator regarding our further actions we will try within the framework of a-a weapons within the framework of e-e nato we will try to continue to invest together in support of the nato budget the first in the history of nato we will invite partners from the asian and e pacific region representatives of japan south korea australia that will reflect our close partnership, some pacification of nato allies, how will this affect the indefinite situation

of the garlic countries when we talk about new structures of aid and support for the defense capabilities of nato, in particular on the territory of lithuania, we are talking about the fact that all this is not on its own, various elements such as the presence of a larger number of troops, we said that the german troops have already uh two poured the presence of troops attracted additional battalions as well as all our uh all our allies already formed the so-called international battalion, which is already operating. we are trying to strengthen the effort that is already ready for the defense and placement of

the territory of nato allies in order to actively respond to the change in the current situation, and we are also talking about special forces we are not saying that they will be stationed on a permanent basis in the territory of lithuania or in the territory of any other country, but we are saying that they will be responsible for that specific territory and they will undergo rotations, they will carry out training to cooperate with e- e local local personnel for in order to increase the defense power so we are talking about increasing e-e naval power air power now we

are talking about increasing air defense systems on the territory of the baltic countries, therefore, in conclusion, i want to say that this is all strategic planning for the increase of troops on the territory of the allied countries, the increase in the deployment of troops from the deployment of heavy weapons from anti-aircraft weapons systems, as well as specially trained units that will conduct training on the territory of the countries participants of the allied countries, we have once again doubled the groups in lithuania in lithuania in estonia and others, for example in france in belgium and other of our allies, they also increased their presence in romania, therefore, the european union has also significantly increased

the presence of its troops, the presence of these troops is not permanent, there is a current permanent rotation. we are trying to strengthen the territory of the entire alliance, this is our priority . nato allies we support the country in various ways we support and welcome various initiatives today i expect new statements at the current meeting representatives of the leaders of other states, in particular from

of representatives of representatives, a contact group from the side of ukraine, eh, a wide package of assistance to ukraine, to guess with eh, eh, all our efforts that we have already made to help ukraine for almost 10 years, and it includes the transition to the country of ice weapons of the standards of the soviet union to the armament of nato standards to the exchange of practices to the exchange of experience in order to master the er difficult transition of mastering the technique all possible help to er

implement it as soon as possible all the best to increase financial assistance they er what already are provided by nato allies, including defense defense weapons, unmanned aerial vehicles and other weapons , that is, the general package of assistance to ukraine. it covers various aspects in order to strengthen ukraine's defense capabilities. you said heavy weapons. so this means that nato allies will continue to

provide ukraine with heavy weapons . ukraine is armed with nato standards, including flagship e-e systems from the anti-aircraft missile system, as well as all sports of modernized artillery the equipment of armored vehicles and other equipment, i cannot say what statements will be made today, but we understand that a wide range of weapons, including heavy weapons systems, is ukraine in the future, and we see

an unprecedented level of support for ukraine from nato, so if we are talking about ukraine about all these losses, death, brutal abuse, in particular in donbas, of course we understand that we have to provide emergency aid to ukraine to the maximum of our potential. we must provide such aid and do it as soon as possible. well, somewhere with an intercom finland, ancaricide, or somewhere in the world,

postponement , yes, spices. to the entire territory of europe, finland, sweden, they made a sovereign decision, decided on the direction in which they want to move, so another country has no right to prohibit or decide for them what they should be done or should not be done turkey is an important ally of ours and it has expressed its concerns regarding specific decisions aimed specifically at combating terrorism, so when ever our ally is put forward, we consider their

concerns to be legitimate, so we must take the history of musical instruments seriously attention to weigh all the pros and cons to consider such fears also to consider the response from finland and sweden and a-a to cooperate with turkey itself to er-e dispel their fears regarding terrorism i also feel the need to actively cooperate to solve these fears and dispel them i am sure that finland sweden they will become members of nato because they support the policy of

nato the policy of nato expansion taxi fears should be dispelled at the round table rainforce of the naturesention of the presence nato is on the western flank of the profession. so, it is not about the permanent presence of troops, but also about permanent rotation. integration and sovereignty of each country in

europe, which was confirmed, we understand that russia violated all these agreements by attacking ukraine and therefore, such an act in 1997 does not prevent us and does not prevent us from deploying our troops on the territory of nato allies throughout the territory of the alliance union, we understand that that putin's goals putin's goal is not only ukraine, but he himself go beyond the borders of ukraine, therefore, at the meetings here in nato about about the month of december, uh, children of some conclusions by diplomatic means, our proposals, of course, as

threats from russia against ukraine, but they also heard threats against nato, that is why they wanted nato to agree to withdraw all troops and infrastructure of nato from all allied countries from 1997. and they also opposed finland and sweden becoming nato members, that is, countries in a decisive step, finland wanted to become a member of nato, so please speed up to grant them this status

. after all, you said that we can expect more on the territory of the eastern flank, what volume of rice are we talking about, and no, the representatives of germany spoke about the level of the brigade justom, i would also like to understand the issue of turkey, sweden and finland, because a few weeks ago you talked about what you expect that they will be invited to the honey summit in madrid and today we talked about your expectations of change, what

could happen at the madrid summit. yes, i used to be more optimistic because we did not have any hints that there would be any the problem of placing the balda console teams that were put forward by turkey, therefore, accordingly, more time is needed for this than expected. therefore, this is a new aspect of the general process, and it is obvious that turkey has revealed its fears and the foundation of some kind of problem for nato allies, but now we understand that, after all, it takes time to to talk and dispel these problems and fears that are

currently on the agenda and we now have positive signals from the side of finland and sweden, so really now the situation has changed somewhat and we thought that everything would come a little differently but we have what we have that we will have such uh the same uh the same number of military uh on the eastern flank of the flank or from the side of various allied countries so some people declare the scale at the level of brigades, e-e workbook pre-assigned forces that will train other representatives. for example , in lithuania, the number of e-e troops that will be

rotated will be different, consider how much it is possible to increase the presence on the territory of estonia, it is not possible, for example, spain and other e. denmark for example, about the fact that they are ready to increase the presence of nato troops, er, troops in the eastern flank, i am once again saying that france has increased the presence of troops in romania, as well as the presence of the eu. that is, this is an increase in the joint efforts of nato, nato allies and germany's efforts are different and therefore the format of

rotation and not the permanent placement of visas in specific territories, the responsibility and the number of troops will be different when we talk about different nato countries. we will see tomorrow. yen 100 dpr berga before the meeting regarding the supply of weapons and equipment in the format of rammstein 3 with me i watched viktor wertzner major of the reserve of the israel defense forces congratulations viktor unfortunately we have

literally 5 minutes to talk so uh, there will be one question practically that's already tonight we have to hear from the defense ministers of nato about some new allocation of new military aid to ukraine, including heavy weapons, a couple of days ago, the advisor to the head of the president's office, podolyak , called such figures there, one thousand one, 300 and others, and in the answer to this, in principle, was an article in the guardian where it was described that this is practically half of everything that ukraine currently has in general, nato, these are 100 howitzers , 1,000 howitzers, 300 rzv sotanks, what is the total, except that 500 tanks are realistic. well, we understand what the guardia is there sometimes very specific editorial policy, but still, what can we expect from today's meeting that is realistic, actually, well

, as a rule, he always asks for more in order to get, well, at least something, well, ukraine has been doing this for a long time and quite successfully, so uh, on account of what it is, that's not it, well, nato is uh, for example, in the usa the same thing can be said about the agoutis of these deaths in european countries, of course, it’s less than that, but it’s still eh , i doubt that ukraine will get it now look we have such a situation that uh, because of what we are received today it is possible there, i may be wrong in the numbers, but the order i remember very

well it's about 120 of these installations that resemble the rsv, well, let's say that the jet installations are also 300,000 of them. well, what kind of ammunition actually well , that's 10,000 per day per month, if you believe it, well, if you take the number that ukrainians are now being shelled, it is somewhere that the russians in ukraine release 60,000 charges per day all by themselves, that is, it is six times more than we can even have that is, here it is clearly not commensurate, that is, with such at all is it possible to talk about numbers? although it is not correct to talk about stopping the russian offensive that they are currently carrying out on slavyansk and

north donetsian lysichans . for example, if we take the bm-21 degree, the reload time of one installation is around 20 minutes, the reload time is not enough for himars, it is much, much less, if we are talking about accuracy, that is, eh, the bm-21 grad shoots in the direction of the squares and the mlrs or hi-mars has a satellite system guided , that is, uh, well, it is not quite correct to compare uh, installation with installation, because it is uh, completely uh , with all weapons, completely different, and uh, obviously, it would be strange if i didn't ask you about israeli weapons, it's obvious, well, again, it's not about the delivery of this iron

dome, and it's unlikely that we can count on it, but what can we expect at all? can we count on anything from israel ? that as far as we know very recently israel even blocked the supply of its weapons there from other countries. what do you think? i think the pressure should be continued and we will continue it. more politicians and the military in israel are speaking out for ukraine's help, more, er, essential military assistance, er, the thing concerns the population itself, er, israel, and the vast majority have strong opinions about the ukrainian position, so in the end, i think i think something would work out if i were in the place of the ukrainian country. i would have less

impact on the air defense systems because the iron dome can only solve some local tasks . in the ukrainian theater of military operations, simply from the system organs and uh, a huge number of batteries that are needed to cover how many