the consequence of drug overdose decreased by almost 25%."

therapist vladyslav owl mr. vladyslava i congratulate you, so let's start with the simplest thing. but i will tell you right away that we don't have much time for this, so that in 10 minutes, let's say, we managed to put everything on the shelves, so please tell me exactly how medical cannabis works on the human body and if we are going to compare it with recreational cannabis - it is a different action, because in the medical uh, actually

speaking, in medicines, it is produced like uh, cannabis, and in fact, there is no effect to tetrahydrocamebion which well is considered the same narcotic substance that is also a psychostimulant and so on and so on and so on and so on if it is an oil or there is some solution that contains a cd so that in principle i agree with these interpretations that these are medical products it can also relieve pain, it can relieve exocyanation there, it can help people suffering from serious neurological diseases , such as epilepsy, for example, in order to reduce or completely stop seizures that are poorly corrected with ordinary letters, so i actually i mean, the problem is that there is no such thing. many doctors, including me, are against medical cannabis, what is it called, but i perfectly understand that, unfortunately, in our country, taking into account the fact that we

have absolutely no regulation of it, i would not i believe that it will be a different situation under cover and it will come to the point that we will help people, in fact, there will be a redistribution of the marijuana market, also marijuana, which will begin to be grown anywhere by anyone, well, you will understand that if they give permission for cultivation that is, it will all be subordinated, who will qualitatively monitor it, no one, therefore, the tenth share will go to the needs of sick people, and 90% of real marijuana will go to the black market, but if you and i say that something is wrong, then it is easy to make this medical so that it is medical cannabis and not ordinary and what is the difference here in general, the difference is that in order to make a medical substance from cannabis , a spectrum of powers is needed, well, let's say there chemical procedures, then it should be a fairly high-quality

laboratory in which chemical procedures will take place processes that lead to the fact that usually the narcotic part is released in cannabis and is thrown out on its own yes and they remain there er cbd and in the video there is no pronounced psychotropic project, it still has it, but it is not so pronounced and it does not excite the nervous system so much on the contrary, it is a little bit even depressing with a different action. but nevertheless, these are all very complex processes that require highly qualified personnel . there should be this talent, it should be very strict , and then well, of course, you can produce medicine on the basis of canada, so you can afford to work on the processing of this cannabis for the production of such medicines, well, very few will be able to.

capital well, maybe some one state will comment but again, i say ah, this is what will be grown in ukraine, marijuana yes and where will it go well, well, for the needs of all those institutions there, the dates of the companies that will earn will be only some and who will count how much them it is necessary and the rest will go to the black market, that is, what do we have? people get it sometime in a year or two because the production cannot be started, and in 2-3 weeks, as they say, they get ukrainian medicines, which will obviously be cheaper than those made from abroad, but during that period of time it will be grown there i don't know how much eh eh tens of thousands of tons of marijuana that will go there on the

black market, then we will have a surge of marijuana addiction, i will have a limitless variety of psychosomatic and psychological disorders to you, this is a counter question if you really see such a problem, but you also understand that medical cannabis and medicine on the basis of cannabidol are very necessary in our country because there is such a need and there is such a need, but then how to be in this situation and then how to get out correctly, you say that there is a law what is it now, but it is not ideal and something needs to be changed, what exactly needs to be changed in order for us to be able to give patients who need medical cannabis and at the same time so that there is no such addiction that you are talking about , the representative, there are no clear procedures written down, due to which it will happen already with a strict

adjustments and let's say the dates, who will take care of the cultivation of marijuana, which will be used to produce medicine, and look, in fact, this law was first tried to be passed somewhere. it has been there for 8 months, if i remember, and it was in the parliamentary tribune mps spoke and said yes and that we are not against it, but we need to finalize this bill. we decided to hold back a little. but at the moment, when i am at war in ukraine, there are a lot of other issues, they decided to hype up and say that there is a war going on in our chests, people are suffering, we will adopt this law that is, the drug addict, in my understanding, is again trying to use, let's say, such a stressful situation in order to attract an incomplete bill and earn a lot of money from it, because it's, well, it's millions tens of millions of dollars in profit if there is a scheme that will clearly regulate what, for example

, the company of ivan kupkin can grow cannabis there, and cider petrovych, which is clearly regulated, grows a certain amount of a substance that is necessary for the production of a certain amount based on needs people, yes, in ukraine there is a certain amount of cannabis-based medicine. ok, no question. people should receive all the help. they should not suffer. they should not be hostages of this situation, but if these regulations it won't happen if it's simple. how can a private person get a permit to grow marijuana in order to teach it? will you supply it? well, look, i'll give an example from uh-uh, earlier, how was the situation with poppies, so you grow poppies. you have a permit for this. yes, you collect it there. and it looks like there is some kind of production there, but what do you have to do to dispose of amat straw, but in fact, what do you do with it? what did they do with it

? beliefs actually that if the cultivation of marijuana is allowed in general, supposedly in order to later produce medicine with it, then we will have the same 3.10% that will actually go to the raw materials with which the medicine will be produced, and more than 90 percent will go to the black market exclusively for narcotic pleasure after all, i have hope that anyone will not grow cannabis and see if you use medical cannabis and drugs based on which you cannot become a drug addict, but there is such an example . well, for me personally, it is a wonder and for people who they also need medical cannabis, because narcotic medicinal products are allowed to be sold in ukraine, but narcotic non-narcotic medical cannabis cannot be sold here, this is very strange, actually, you

understand, the medical system is not perfect and there are a lot of laws that were passed, they will be overturned 30-40-50 years ago under the soviet union, therefore, it is clear that the entire legislative framework regarding the use of, say, yes there, including narcotic drugs, must be revised quite significantly. actually, i i thought it was necessary that the people who are responsible for this should focus on this, well, 3-5-10 years ago, we talked about this a lot, this is not the first situation, and it is not 10:00, not 20, unfortunately, and that is why i have such a reason for very big doubts that this situation will be controlled because in 25 years of my professional activity there has never been a single secretion from the side, and the ministry there yes and i know that they correspond to some systematic concrete actions to allow er-er to qualitatively change and

finalize all those codes yes there those are all lists and so on and so on, a decision is made from above, we introduce that or we prohibit that and no one else does anything, so unfortunately, unfortunately, i have 98, well, let's say a percentage feeling that the same situation will be here, again, i say the task is what to a person received the same medical cannabis yes. and in principle, my name is this, the medicine is produced in canada, she should have received it today, the day before yesterday. a week ago . so far there is no clear understanding of how it will all be done or who will control it, people will not receive it, so why not simplify this situation with two orders of the ministry of health that can allow the use and establishment of foreign

production of medical antibiotics in ukraine for purchase and sale or let's say yes, at the expense of the state, there are some quotas so that people who are good but have a need receive all this for enough city funds, and only then earn money, unfortunately, we are live on the air and can no longer to communicate because the time has run out, i thank you very much for today's communication and wish you all the best. you were contacted by a narcologist, psychiatrist , psychotherapist vladislav sava. well, we understood . we talked about the prohibition of drugs. we understood that each case will be considered separately, so with medical cannabis, the most important thing is that people with chronic diseases do not suffer. i was with you iryna koval and the program about health take care

i congratulate myself, this is the news of the economy during the war, thursday, june 16. i am andriy yanitsky, you are watching the espresso tv channel, if you are doing this on the internet and not on television, please comment on this video, like it, share it with your friends, yes, more people will see it, and now to the news the total losses from the war in ukraine's agriculture have already exceeded 4 billion 300 million dollars, as calculated by the kyiv school of economics, russian aggression affects not only the ability to freely export agricultural products and feed about 400 million people around the world every year, and this is also the damage to land and infrastructure and agricultural machinery, these factors affect the cultivation of crops according to the

forecasts of the world bank, the ukrainian economy will shrink by 45% this year. the national bank gives more optimistic figures 30 40% , and tens of millions of people around the world are already malnourished due to interruptions in the export of grain from ukraine. well, due to the destruction of the kremenchug thermal power plant as a result of missile strikes in the city, the beginning of the heating season is under threat at the moment, hearings are being held in the residential micro-districts of the left-bank kremenchuk regarding the transition of houses to alternative sources of heat supply. the main question is whether people will have time and whether they have enough money. let's see the story . for example, people in a multi-story building decide to switch from electric heating to individual heating, so what's next. opportunities in the house, which house is it, will it

be able to move to, or will it be necessary to reconstruct not only the property of one's own house, but also the reconstruction of another property, this is the pipeline the gas pipe of the apartment is separate or the house is generally decided by the residents themselves, now the city government introduces the regulatory framework for the transition of buildings to an alternative source of heat supply, the rights are there, but the possibilities are limited both in terms of time for processing documents and financially, the arrangement of individual heating of one apartment will cost its owner from 50 up to uah 100,000 although, according to experts, in any case it will be cheaper than the standard option, diversification of heat supply always good for example, we are talking about the central heating supply, well, we lost it in the networks of the district mains, they are small, this is 30% of the tariff. which ones do we deduct, which people will not pay for it? ugh, the representatives of the authorities themselves convince the citizens that centralized heating is

the most optimal option, which they are currently working on relevant services, all of them, efforts are being made to preserve centralized heating , it is optimal, we need to go into the heating season and create additional capacities that were destroyed, others where they will be, i will not tell you, but all this time, all efforts are being made, centralized heating will be at the same time at the end of may, the deputies of the kremenchuk city council, in a non-extraordinary session, approved the program for the construction of three new boiler houses with an estimated cost of uah 2.3 billion. iryna skripachova from kremenchuk for of the espresso tv channel, the president of france, the chancellor of germany and the prime minister of italy arrived in ukraine today and will discuss with the ukrainian authorities not only the issue of weapons, but also the issue of european the prospects of ukraine today on the subject of the european perspective we will talk with our guest ihor

buryakovsky, he heads the institute of economic research and political consultations and is already our regular guest on thursdays mr. ihor vitau vitau so, in order to somehow start this conversation about the european union, try to convince me that we it is economically beneficial to join the european community about values, we all understand everything, yes, we share values, but what does that mean for us in terms of material things, to say the least it's just that the european union today is a community of the most developed states and being a member of such a club is always not only prestigious but also profitable, why is it profitable at least three points, the first one. joining the european union, we must adhere to the appropriate rules and appropriate methods of regulating ukrainian economic activity, this is very it is important for ukraine because we

are talking about reform, we are talking about the necessary changes of certain things, and the european union already proposes those rules that have been tested in practice and which can be used immediately, the second point is that the european union has an extremely powerful e-e capacity, because it has extremely large, powerful information to help its member countries, these are the so -called structural funds, and in this way we actually get access to many programs of the european union, and the programs of the european union are money and technologies and many other things. and finally , the third and most important point is that ukraine today is largely oriented towards the markets of the european union, and thus when we we enter the system where the same rules work for us and for the european union, this means that our exporters get additional opportunities to export their goods there. well, our importers can use those services and goods that are produced in the

european union. the history of the european union also began with the economic union, i.e. first the economy went on, then it was already increasing. other governing bodies were created and thus the european union became an influence because without an economic basis it is quite difficult to talk about some kind of geopolitical influence. but is the candidacy for joining the eu a mandatory step? can we somehow bypass it ? why don't we immediately take it and join? why don't we accept it there? why is this a candidate ? to say that what kind of organization is the european union very clearly regulates the procedures for accession and the procedures for cooperation with other countries that are not members of the european union, why is candidacy necessary candidacy is a kind of negotiation process by the european union that is, we we come, we apply, we made the application

, the european council accepts it, it did it, it helps the european commission to consider these applications and propose to the members of the european union either to support and accept the country as a candidate, to grant candidate status or not to do this during the candidate status, e.e. the european union is studying in great detail what what is happening in our country, what is happening in the field of transport, what is happening in the field of environmental protection , market regulation and many, many other things that is, it actually determines how compatible we are with the european union during these negotiations, the country usually makes decisions in order to adapt european legislation and thus when thus , when the negotiations are over or a member of the european union and as it is written in one of the criteria, we are ready to fulfill our obligations this is a completely normal process and, in principle, it is the same path

ukraine followed when it joined the world organization. first of all, there are requirements for becoming a candidate for trade. i understand that there are requirements for becoming a member of the european union . legislation must be standardized. we must have everything work in the same way, so that we are compatible with our economy and laws. and to become a candidate, we have somewhere not to answer correctly or to write as a candidate, there are no such, you know , absolutely specific requirements, yes, in principle , this is largely a political decision, but at the same time, this decision is made in order to well, let's be honest speak so that this big club does not have any problems directly with the newcomer, therefore, in principle , a decision can be made yes and a decision can be made no, but even if a decision is made, so we are granted candidate status , the negotiations themselves regarding joining the european union do not necessarily begin at the next day after we were given candidates but candidacy is already despite the fact that this country so it will

join the european union and all the member countries of this club agree with this and who is now candidates, i heard that turkey as a candidate for joining the european union has been there for 36 years, it seems, or i'm wrong, well, the candidate really is, let's say, turkey , that is, north macedonia. so it must be said that the situation with turkey is very simple. why because it is a country of european, asian and by and large account is when it comes to joining the european union. this moment, because it is important, because the european union is the countries of the european union, but not the countries of the european union. but nevertheless, there are problems with turkey related to political processes, but at the same time, we must not forget that turkey is already a member of the european union, relatively speaking, for half of it, it was on the common

market. i would say that it is a plus candidate. that is, it is largely integrated into the common european market, but at the same time it is not yet a full-fledged member of the european union. well, there are questions about how democratic a country it is. as far as i understand, there are questions about, for example , the independence of the central bank of turkey, where erdoğan directly affects the discount rate, which has already led to an increase in inflation in this country to more than 70% annually. correct, i would just like to say that when we talk about the entry criteria in principle, there are three criteria that a country must satisfy in order to be part of the european union. the first criterion is the so -called stable institutions that ensure democracy, the rule of law, the protection of human rights and respect and protection of minorities, we know that

erdoğan has big problems with these, and it is obvious that this is one of the factors that does not allow us to make a final decision on turkey's accession to the european union. true well, we have a problem related to the effectiveness of the functioning of the institutions. we have problems with the fight against corruption. but nevertheless , we do not have, say, minorities, such as the kursk machine, which is subjected to certain utyra from the central government in turkey. yes we have more or less respect human rights and it is about their political and in some other way, so i think that if you compare us with turkey, i would say that ukraine is a more democratic country compared to the autocratic regime of erdoğan well , after all, we are talking about economic topics and er, i am more interested in where we are ready, where we are not ready for joining the eeu in

economic terms, which markets are harmonized in our country , which sectors of the economy are already european in our country, er, this question is very difficult to answer briefly why so that in order for us to become a member of the european union, we must prove that we have accepted and are ready to comply with the basic legislation of the european union, the basic legislation of the european union is the so-called 35 thursdays, 35 sections, and if we talk about each specific section, then we have many there are various indicators of compliance or non-compliance with the legislation of the european union . members of the european energy community well, a lot has been done to liberalize trade and everything related to this, we are talking about e-e standards, we are talking about other types of regulation, including the

development of small and medium-sized businesses, but nevertheless , we have a problem with related to environmental protection is one of the most difficult parts. by the way of the european union, there is a problem related to, let's say, the regulation of financial services . around 30 is possible. forty e-e indicators of the european union in some divisions. unfortunately , we are still at a not very high not very high level, but for this it is necessary and for this it is necessary e-e efforts that indicate that the negotiations and implementation of the european legislation, they go directly in parallel , and i think that in this sense ukraine has all the possibilities and deserves to start its path to the european union, well, for simplification and to explain to the audience what it means to harmonize our

branches of the economy to the european ones, let's remember about the visa-free program. yes, we have a visa-free program from europe, but at the same time, we have a so-called energy-related visa -free program . we did not differ either in terms of standards, or in terms of product quality, and no. so far, the quality of life is different from european countries. well, i guess there are some downsides to the fact that we want to become members of the eu, and the more obvious one is that we are renouncing our sovereignty. that is, we recognize the joint governing bodies and the european commission, and perhaps in the future, we will also consider the transition to the euro. although this is a very distant prospect, and accordingly, it will be up to us to decide what the discount rate will be, and not

the national bank of ukraine, or is there the risks are still economic, the price increase is possible, it is possible that our producers will be displaced in our markets by more powerful european foreign ones, what can we say about today well, let's say that if we look at the new members of the european union we are talking about the central and eastern european countries, we are talking about the baltic countries, so far none of these countries have broken up due to the fact that it is in the european union. although of course there is competition, but in principle, competition is very much a normal process of its time . interesting studies that showed that the european union and the countries that joined the european union receive an additional boost to their development by being part of the system . creates opportunities to pull up backward countries to an average level or equal to even the most developed countries. it takes a long time

to explain, but this economic system works in a team. it is always easier for us to solve many issues . because, well, you know, the european union is an opportunity, it's an opportunity that we have to take advantage of, and when we talk about losing a part of our sovereignty, we don't lose a part of our sovereignty it's just that certain functions are related to the regulation of, for example, certain areas, we transfer them to another body, we delegate these functions, but in the end , ukraine, as a future member of, say , the european council, has the right to vote on how these or other major political decisions will be made that we harmonize that we do not harmonize. will we accept members here as well? we are just using the consensus tool, and as we see, unfortunately it is working against us now in the case of hungary, for example yes, unfortunately, unfortunately

it works, but on the other hand, this indicates that even in the european union there are fuses for small countries, for countries that are not leaders in economic terms, in order to protect their national interests. igor, thank you for talking to us. igor burakovskyi was the head of the institute of economic of research and political consultations. after this conversation, he mentions a fairly well-known column field rounded nobel laureate in economics who wrote in the new yorker that trade is always more profitable for all parties than war, but on it's a pity, wars are still going on because some people just don't know how to play the economy. and i have the latest news for today about the european union, which is increasingly moving away from russia, fortunately, the european union will buy more israeli gas to replace russian gas, the parties have already signed the corresponding agreement , the suchy press edition reports