and why are you presenters there eh san-san-time a-ah eh cnn took place thanks to eh lieutenant colonel victor pysanky we are very grateful after that it was just the first investigation of the command of the medical forces , that is, it not only did not help and did not help to release the tyra it also hindered the reporting of information about her, in the same way they then banned the new commander a month ago on the facade of the zaporizhzhia hospital, where taeru has been sending advisers all these years. she was once an aikido trainer in zaporizhzhia, everyone knows that she is famous she was an athlete before the war and now she was engaged in paralympic sports, it was forbidden to make a mural , volunteers collected money for a mural a month ago, the volunteer council of zaporozhye approved this sketch, it was all in order to make this mural dedicated to doctors and medics, what kind of horses and unfortunately

, the command of the medical forces - it also banned this mural. it has not been done yet. the volunteers said that maybe they will do it now. our doctors loyal to ukraine, loyal to our fighters and those who survived a very difficult period, and therefore it is our hope that this will happen to everyone, that everyone will return , the main thing is not to forget about them, because i was told many times to calm down, do not raise the question that somehow it will happen and as proved by the fact that we constantly kept the leaders of the country and our special services under pressure and constantly worked with international organizations, international governments and presidents, and all our patriots helped to hear about the tragedy and abroad.

it happened. that it is effective. that it works. therefore, we do not forget about our european wounded, and with the dynamics of increasing their number, because the statements of the advisers of the head of the presidential office yermak have stunned many people, both in the west and in ukraine itself, and the secretary of the nsdc, danilov, is quite harsh specifically answered those people who voiced certain data, but if we talk specifically about the zaporizhia military hospital, how did the dynamics with the wounded change, i am at the staff point, that is, i am at the front zone, and therefore i only sometimes now i go to the zaporizhzhia hospital when you can go to the wounded or there in the region, are you or our specialized hospitals, and well, the last number i remember. it was a few weeks ago,

there were more than three thousand wounded people, definitely i don't know the exact figure , because almost two and a half thousand wounded people passed through us there, so of course it's more, and now we have 40 or more during the day, and there were days when we had 118 wounded in a day to our stop point, er, of course, now er, well yesterday we had 21, but of course there are much more in the luhansk direction, without a doubt, that is, they have more now. go there because the situation is difficult there and of course, uh, through those points go from 100 early a day. that is, the situation there is yours , that is, that there may be somewhere around noon, 500 or

more wounded per day. this is absolutely true about the dead, of course, for us too. what of course, it can be a number of up to a thousand per day, this cannot happen, i think that simply mr. arkhomia went abroad and maybe he wanted to scare him or show our real tragedy , because maybe his task was to optimize international partners who sometimes promise a lot but don't do everything and er well, unfortunately, every day 200 and yesterday the same two of our heroes quit and the day before yesterday three er and and two days ago three and that is if you count that there are dozens of points like ours along the front. you can count approximately number a in the direction of severodonetsk of the luhansk region e-e in the direction of now bahmut of course

lost many times more thank you ms. oksana for this inclusion and once again congratulations thank you for your work oksana korchynska volunteer was the coordinator of the volunteer medical services of the azov and shakhtarsk special battalions was the coordinator of the civilian headquarters of the ato in medicine, a person who is in the topic as they say, it has been quite a long time since we have other online guests, and there is also a person who is definitely in our next topic for a long time, this is serhiy garmash a journalist, a representative of certain districts of the donetsk luhansk regions, as part of the ukrainian delegation in the tripartite contact group, we will remind you of the times when this was relevant. sergei, we congratulate you . glory to ukraine. good morning. glory to the heroes. well, it seems that negotiations with russia can be resumed at the end of august after the contrast of the counter-offensives of the armed forces of ukraine mr. arakhimiya said about this, so to speak. how do you see this situation? well, i don't know

what mr. arakhimiya was guided by in making such statements , because, first of all, there are no counterattacks yet. er such as and er somehow er shifted the balance of military strength yes and made ukraine stronger than russia and why did he decide that it would happen in august well, i don't know, but the only thing i want to say is that very it is important that it is not the politicians who should determine when we should stop the counter-offensives, as he says, and start talking with the enemy at the negotiations . well, what struck me in this statement is he means to stop at the demarcation line in donbas and start negotiations from there, that is, no to liberate ukrainian territory and to stop

the ukrainian army while it is liberating its territory in order to negotiate with the enemy. well, it seems strange to me during the war and it seems to me that the military should decide where to stop and they should be guided not by political considerations but by their own opportunities , that is, if we have the strength and resources, then we should liberate the entire territory of ukraine, if there is no uh, then we will really have to stop, it will be clear, i think society will understand this, but stop ah in order to restore your strength, resources, continue the offensive, not just an offensive . what, well, let's just imagine the internal political risks. yes, if

this scenario, which he says about, takes place, negotiations with russia took place, they agreed on some minsk there, four conditionally four or three yes and that is, donbas is not liberated but this issue is solved diplomatically as we have already solved it for 8 years very effectively we solved it yes what did it lead to and political life in ukraine was restored after that a-a elections the opposition begins to tell a- and to blame the government for the fact that it betrayed ukraine because it stopped the ukrainian troops without giving a single and liberating its territory, the territory of ukraine, and what does the government do? leaders of the main administration - this is a traditional ukrainian entertainment, but on a completely different scale,

with completely different risks, to end the leaders of friends, which is not necessary, then he should be fired, that donbas , that there are separate compartments and so on . can agree with this and then we lose our territory even mentally, you are not even here, it is not a question of society, it is a question of our military, our army, we know what the losses are, we know what the attitudes are about it roughly hinted by the secretary of the national security council, mr. danilov, saying that if literally yes, if the war is stopped without the consent of society, it will go to war without the government, this is extremely so, so to speak, a thick hint from the other side, we understand whether a reply will fly from the president's office to the secretary of the national security council and of defense because he

voiced his position quite harshly, we often talk about the kremlin towers, but nevertheless we see such calls between ukrainian officials of different levels, and this cannot but be disturbing. well we'll see. i hope that it's still not the head, even of the presidential one, but it's the speakers of the parliamentary france. france will decide where to stop our military and stop the liberation of our territory at what border. if we talk about oleksiy danilov and his latest statements , then he urged also not to declare losses in the war without access to real information. we just discussed this issue with oksana korchynska, who is very concerned with saving the lives of our soldiers. she really does not understand the latest numbers either

that sounded in the information space but nevertheless, the information is very colorful, the president says there about a hundred, the president's office says up to 200, arahamia already voices the number up to a thousand. they are generally for different audiences, internal and external. surely some explanation can be given, but would you advise me to comment on such sensitive points? well, first of all , it seems to me that there is confusion here, that is, i said about uh, 1000 losses, losses - it's not only two hundred, it's 300, that is, the wounded, and according to the generally accepted statistics or practice, the losses are calculated approximately like this, that is, the number of two hundred dead is multiplied by three, and it is considered that

this is approximately the number of wounded, this is the practice , so i really don’t know where he got the thousand digits of 1,000, and because he refutes the president with this, that is, and the president and the president’s office , which is called there up to 100 and there up to 200 at most what i heard really because if compare- well, multiply 200 by 30 or 600 heads. well, no, not a thousand. but maybe we don’t know something, but maybe it’s really emphasized and addressed specifically to our western partners in order for us to mobilize them, and the only thing is, of course, wherever you are said and no matter who you say it to. it must be taken into account that we live in a global information court and are

spied on so-er and not. individuals make their own conclusions therefore, we should probably be more careful, that is, for example, documents a little bit, then i would like to note how the position of the russians has changed. the secretary of the security council of the russian federation, mykola patroshev, literally said the other day that the russian leadership is interested in reaching political and diplomatic agreements with ukraine as soon as possible . be connected, do they sincerely want to negotiate, or have we already been there and know well, for now, they are leading the offensive, we are sorry, little by little, but very slowly, but we are giving in. that is why they are profitable now negotiations because they are the stronger side and because they, er, now a crisis has arisen at the front , that is, they have concentrated all their forces in small north donetsk yes, this is the second army in the world it is so-called and they cannot advance, of course well, shameless, let’s

say so er first of all, that is why they are really interested in negotiations, what to press first, while they are stronger, and secondly, to regroup, prepare reserves to dig in, and there is a second, third line of defense in the south, and they need this pause, let's say so, and that's why i think that maybe he is telling the truth to the proath that although of course we hear these statements that they want to come to an agreement there by peaceful means, and we hear from the first day of the actual great registration a-a and eh-e what are the conditions of their agreement in their opinion, and they are constantly voiced by mr. piskov who says that they want ukraine to recognize the de facto situation, i.e., the occupation of the occupied territory and the control of those territories by russia over the territories it occupied once again not long ago , i wanted to ask you about the specifics of the negotiating positions, so to speak, because the adviser

the head of the russian delegation at the negotiations in belarus, medinskyi, said that 75% was agreed on, on the one hand, we understand that after irpen, this situation has been reset, but in any case, we do not fully understand what the framework is about here, we are also talking about bialystok-istanbul morning transit, and on the other hand, there is an italian plan, which no one has noticed either, but we understand that some kind of process is going on, i would ask you to describe at least some framework borders of that plan, more or less. it is clear. and this is the plan of the italians and it has nothing to do with ukraine. that is, we can say so. at least i think that is what our president says

, and the visit of mr. the tonality of their speeches show that they came to ask and uh johnsons came to support us in opposition to those requests with requests and what's more, i can say i was just doing a discourse analysis of all these speeches and i can say that there is progress once they came or they called and pressured us to accept russia's conditions. and now they are simply asking us to start a dialogue with russia, and this is a very big progressive mathematical a-a and we will now really choose when should we start this dialogue because we have the support of the united states the states have the support of great britain in this matter, and therefore the measure is a measure regarding our framework, so to

speak. so there are doubts about that stop there on the line of february 24th, and then decide the fate of crimea and donbas through negotiations, ugh, because this means freezing the conflict in fact and postponing the war to the next day. i don’t understand why such conditions are ukraine agreeing to such conditions because we don't know the military situation that will be there for some time. yes , that is, now we will have weapons and we will be able to dictate to russia, not what to stop. and i think that we should demand from it the decentralization of russia, as it demanded from ukraine, and that will solve it many times, as we go along, let's remember the minsk agreements. yes, there is a change in the constitution, the decentralization of ukraine, and russia was not the winner. and if ukraine is the winner, why ca n't we demand it? that's why we need a month,

somewhere in between, there is a chance to stay to dream about it anymore is absolutely normal, not serhii, the time-honored decision uh-uh, um, it happened and it’s actually a visa regime with the russian federation, well, i finally thought . i, on the other hand, have been in the negotiation process for a long time. during the process, no one had the idea before that it was simply necessary to do it. well, of course , it was discussed by society a-a. what was the problem, why didn’t we prepare our rockets? why didn’t we produce them? and ammunition, yes. when we were running out, we had a lot of problems. i think that this was one of the many problems that either did not get to

, or there was no political motivation, and we understand that well, if we do it, the cabinet of ministers i think yes to approve there was a corresponding decision in the cabinet of ministers, was there anyone interested in not doing this? why? well, it is possible for some internal political motivations, some, yes , that is, there may be different problems, we know that a lot of ukrainians worked in russia. i remember such arguments were heard. although in my opinion they are not true, they are not well- argued, because we are introducing a visa regime with russia. russia was with us, it does not introduce a visa regime. i.e. from russia to us we will release or not release a-a- according to our wishes in principle

thank you thank you serhiy garmak journalist representative of certain districts of donetsk and luhansk regions as part of the ukrainian delegation in the tripartite contact group sounds at least like the title gauguin solena worked directly broadcast of the information and analytical marathon we thank him for this comprehensive analysis. the operational command of the south informs that our aviation attacked the concentration of the enemy and his equipment , our military carried out four air attacks on the manpower and equipment of the enemy, as well as on the russian warehouse of ammunition, there is a pangoret with us, mr. serhiy, we congratulate you, glory to ukraine returned fire, that is, we have already increased our capabilities

are at a sufficient level to counter-attack with our aircraft the enemy in the south, particularly in mykolaiv oblast losses of the enemy just along the southern axis. there is a clash between ukrainian and russian troops, and this indicates that the capabilities of aviation are being used effectively enough for these tasks, but when we talk directly about the counteroffensive, i think that these measures will be possible only after stabilization of the front line will take place and, in particular, there will be a break directly with the people of donbas. i would like to note that this is the same ukrainian aviation that has been destroyed more than once by the russian federation

at least that's what they stated, yes, the chief pushes indicators according to which, conditionally speaking, we don't even have an army at all, they start taking into account the losses that they attribute to their troops anti-facto - the situation looks absolutely exactly the opposite, mr. sergey, we see that uh, it has increased so we have become more frequent cases when e ukrainian e shells hit warehouses with ammunition in command posts e-e in what is very important for the enemy to carry out his bloody deeds in our country, this is an attempt to weaken a little i don't know the grip of trying to drag out the time until the same promised armed assistance begins to reach us. well, when we talk about the strikes there and on the russian forces directly in

donetsk in the area of ​​novaya kakhovka, thermal accommodation between the headquarters and reserves ammunition, this means that, firstly, we have a larger amount of high-quality intelligence information, and secondly, we are already using the types of weapons that are available today, because directly all these m-3 howitzers of the seven that you are currently showing are really already effective are working in the donbass and in other areas, but this combat work of these howitzers is quite difficult, because if we take into account the recent statements of representatives of the ministry of defense there, it was said that they are indeed actively used, but they also need quick repair in view of to the fact that the enemy is firing in response, we need to get spare parts and spare barrels for these guns in view of the high saturation of combat

and directly tied to new models of foreign-made weapons that are used mr. serhiy's ukrainian army joined us just a couple of minutes ago directly from luhansk region kyrylo sazonov, a well-known ukrainian political scientist, now a fighter in the armed forces of ukraine, and he made such a bold assumption that it would be better from a tactical point of view to withdraw from severodonetsk because there are extremely serious problems with supply, the enemy destroyed all the bridges over the river. yes, there are problems. it is, of course, up to the command, but how do you see the situation with syrodonetsk, do we, for example, have the ability to liberate this city, it is about liberation of our group that can be encircled has arisen repeatedly, but here we will consider the recent statement of the holokomanovich-governor valery

zaluzhny, who said that sedronetsk plays a key role in the protection and construction of defenses in donbas . groupings that are located directly in the sedronets grouping that is located in lysychansk and those reserves that are pulled directly into this north donets arc to lysychansk, which is understood by our military they are trying to prevent the narrowing of this corridor directly from the popasnaya road to the lysychanska bakhmut highway, they are making it impossible to advance there from the top of the estuary and rubizhny down, and this requires quite significant efforts by the ukrainian units regarding the question of the destruction of

bridges and the bridging of bridges and the military and our administration says that it is possible to provide our units even in such conditions, but i think that we should really say so, there are risks and there are options. what happened here was not repeated just like that, well, i don’t dare, i m- i want to warn that it doesn’t happen again in mariupol, we ensure the corresponding scenario, well, it’s hard to categorically say such things, even to a non-expert level . the situation is really difficult there , because a significant number of our units are there, and i hope that there are options for leaving when the situation becomes extremely acute . although i see that the logic of the general staff is

therefore, in order to saturate this area with artillery and prevent the debt from advancing to this area . although from the point of view of a rational approach, there were statements and assessments that it is better to move to the dominant heights in lysychansk and from there carry out the same work that today we are going to north donetsk, in particular, to destroy the enclosing force and equipment of the enemy using the advantages of the area directly in lysychansk p. sergiu yesterday spoke with maria over a cup from carpathian sich they work in raisin direction, we talked about the settlement of dmytrivka. and from where units of the defense forces of ukraine actually forced the enemy to leave. i don't know if it is possible to gain a foothold there now, but she emphasized that this is a strategically important settlement, the control over which can influence the situation in luhansk region in particular. comment on this thanks to the statements of the

foreign ancient structures there and the cursory conclusions from the summary of the general staff, it is possible to say that in the izyum direction, in some directions, we will introduce actions that are directed on the impossible non-delivery of military equipment of the personnel of the russian federation directly there in the direction of the luhansk region, that is why such active hostilities continue in these settlements that you ordered and in other places, although there are changes and successes in certain directions so what does it say even there we use the capabilities of our armed forces but there is no such sharp break yet, but there is an opportunity for this ukrainian army to the northern part of kharkiv oblast in general the situation in the region there it is more difficult because it can be said that the artillery and aviation shelling continues, the enemy is trying to

recapture these lines that they lost after our contract to the border with the russian federation, there will be an increase in the number of personnel of the russian federation to carry out such counteroffensive actions on our positions, it is important for us to hold on there in view of the fact that we also have to pose threats to estimates of logistics lines that go from vovchansk to kopyansk, and there this threat to these lines is maintained at the expense of if we get all the positions, but there the situation around stary saltov changes from hand to hand and the dynamics of hostilities in this area will be long and on the way to the end of the period. i think there is an accumulation of enemy forces there, is it enough for an attempt to recapture kharkiv or not? i think that what it is possible in view of those forces to throw for the defense of

kharkiv, but in some areas there is a certain advance that allows you to use artillery again to strike the surroundings of kharkiv, if we are talking about enemy actions, and i think that such the effort will continue if i think that it is important here how the leadership of the armed forces ensures the distribution of its resources in order to keep this area from the threat for the use of the russian serhiy for this extremely correct and professional analysis of the situation in the theater of combat serhiy zgurets, director of the information consulting company defense express worked live on the espresso tv channel, a traditional moment of silence, a moment of remembrance for all the dead