it is simply held in different countries , partners in the european union are determined. well, in other countries they are also responsible for this and they are preparing, and our embassies are trying to be very responsible for this because it is a certain chance for our entrants. we must understand how someone on the air, unfortunately, is forced to interrupt you, forgive the projector of the kyiv university borys hrynchenko - oleg hrynevych and the ex-minister of education of ukraine struck the drilling rigs in the black sea, which are also called boyka's rigs the verkhovna rada imposed a ban on russian music and ratified the istanbul convention in luhansk region , heavy fighting continues, this is freedom, my name is vlad and

lazur . the borders of the luhansk region until june 26, the deputy minister of defense hanna malyar informed about this, according to her words , decisive battles are currently underway in the severodonetsk and lysychansk regions. well, in the meantime the head of the luhansk region, serhii gaidai, reports that the ukrainian military has lost control over the village of metyolki in the luhansk region, which is located literally next to severodonetsk. well, at the same time, the american institute for the study of war reports in its current report that the collection of russian artillery in combination with the presumably small number of infantry units remains insufficient for the advancement of russia within severodonetsk, we will talk about the situation in luhansk oblast next roman vlasenko head of severodonetsk the district state administration is in touch with us, we are greetings to you. good evening. first of all, i want to ask about the village of mityolkina.

ukrainian troops have probably left there. well, as mr. gaidai reports, how important and strategic is this village, what is happening there, to say that somehow it will directly affect severodonetsk it probably won't have much of an effect psychologically, this is a certain problem for us. i have already said several times that on the other side of the donets, we control not only a part of the north donets industrial zone, but also a few populated areas, that is, we had such a bridgehead on that side of the donets, where with which well, we have complicated logistics. therefore, it was a little bit of backlash for maneuvers, so that our guys would not be surrounded by nitrogen on the north donets track. but in this in the context, it is a problem in a certain way, but i am saying directly for north donetsk, well, especially where there is a tactical

advantage and it does not pose a problem, the fact is that the russians, er, use the tactics of squeezing on the ground and fighting in single-story settlements it is easier at the expense of aviation and artillery than in multi-apartment buildings, street battles at industrial facilities, that's why they have certain successes in rural areas, and what's more, the russians are storming the defense positions of the armed forces of ukraine, there are no special radical changes there, they are shelling the heart of the lety industrial zone, residential areas as well as near sila. just those who are also near north donetsk, which is under the control of the armed forces of ukraine, the situation is difficult and without fundamental changes, let's say, you know, this is my

weekend, the leaders of the so-called lpr reported that allegedly from the nitrogen enterprise located in north donetsk goes to the bomb shelters where the military and civilians are allegedly coming out and surrendering as prisoners, you can comment on it somehow . i think this is another russian fake and provocation , they invented for themselves that they organized a humanitarian corridor with us, what is interesting is that it is a humanitarian corridor towards uncontrolled ukraine and i think that in this regard, they repeat the mariupol scenario, when they offer to appear as civilians in the occupied territory, to appear as military, but in fact nothing is happening, i'm saying all this is another fake, another provocation from the russian federation. and one more piece of information from the russian federation, more precisely, the head of chechnya, ramzan kadyrov , just a couple of hours ago reported, reported

more precisely, about the taking of toshkivka and this village 30 km from severodonetsk . can you comment on it in any way, deny or confirm it is such a sprawling village, it is difficult to say which part is controlled by the russians and which part is controlled by the armed forces of ukraine, and it is right there toshkivka, there are several settlements that are all united together in toshkivka under one name. therefore, they may have had some success there . yesterday, they had an attempt to break through to the road that connects the mountain with lysichansk. they had some success, but they were covered our infantry supported it. therefore, all of these attacks were stormed deep and they were repulsed. therefore, i think that , like the north donetsian potoshkivka, they were especially successful. they don’t have a road between the mountainous

lysichansky, we control it, but it’s really not very far there either. this message from minister of ukraine hanna malyar said that russia allegedly wants to enter the administration of the borders of the luhansk region by june 26. and you can somehow comment on why on june 26 you know something about this, i know on june 22 why i know why on july 1 because, well , such deadlines are already they sounded why exactly the 26th, i don’t know , maybe we are talking about july 1, when they wanted to leave, there are still plans for may for the administration of the borders and luhansk region of donetsk region, exactly until july 1, plus maybe some leeway is taken but i think that all these political statements all these political dates uh they are for us they are playing to their advantage because the enemy is wrong, the enemy is trying to carry out military tasks by non

-military methods and suffers losses. they are wrong very often. i think that such tasks are very useful. was used by the russian army against the ukrainian military, now it is working against the russian invaders themselves, the military in the mykolaiv region showed what trophy weapons they have at their disposal and how they use them they use it, look at

it. the trophy cannon was squeezed out of the tank, and now

it works for the benefit of the employee. as they say, the volume of the enemy is already 5 minutes to the hour . it’s so that everyone already understands what to do. it’s an hour of time and we’re already on the battlefield. you already love this business, then you master the love of artillery, even if it is western, even if it is ours, even if it is a trophy, it is exactly the same in principle, only the little things differ, they hear the little things, the armed forces of ukraine struck

the drilling platforms in the black sea, they are widely known how the boyko towers were captured by russia after the occupation of crimea in 2014, the process was initially reported by the people's deputy of ukraine oleksiy goncharenko, but later confirmed by the kremlin-appointed head of the annexed crimea serhiy aksyonov , according to him, as a result of the attack, there are wounded and missing people, and patrol boats and russian aviation are currently conducting rescue operations work on drilling platforms of chornomor neftyagaz means that since the very morning i have been in touch with colleagues from the ministry of defense of the federal security service, which means that i work primarily on saving people and there were 12 people, respectively , on these borovyh platforms today, at this moment, 5 people have been picked up from them, the second is wounded, the polish rest is

ongoing . parts of ukraine rather than crimea, but already in december 2015, russia moved the so-called boyka towers closer to the occupied peninsula, and the installations are called boyka towers because in 2011-12 the ukrainian the oil and gas production company on the shelf of the black and azov seas, chornomor naftogaz , purchased these two installations, paying for them an amount twice as large as the real value, and the head of the ministry of energy, yuriy boyko , handled the transaction at the time. communications oleksandr musienko , head of the center for military legal research, greetings to you, i congratulate you. explain to us, mr. musienko, why the armed forces of ukraine are attacking the boyka towers, what is their strategic or tactical significance now can play a role in the war well, let's still wait for possible official announcements, because you know, we also had cases in the previous times

when makarov's sparker was not quite understood when it was said that it was precisely attacked, then it turned out that it was not because of it is possible , and indeed this information is true and reliable, but i would still advise you to wait for the exact final reports of our ministry of defense and the general staff, literally. i think that there should be another summary soon, just as it is at this time but if this is so and if it really corresponds to reality and it happened, this indicates two factors: firstly, we really have more and more opportunities and capacities to operate at least in the coastal zone e-e from our coasts - this is 100,200 km and inflict damage on enemy targets, which in itself is extremely good. this shows that we receive from our partners, in particular the united states in britain and nato countries, the weapons that we need

, and we are talking about harpoon missiles and others from the other side it must be understood that, in principle, what russia did in itself was illegal, because they illegally appropriated property that is the property of the ukrainian people as a shelf where the extraction of certain minerals can be carried out, in this case, gas, accordingly, ukraine must be able to use in within the framework of international law, any means and measures for, firstly, or the return of these installations and control over the shelf and extraction of the gas that is there and control over this extraction, secondly, in the event that the ukrainian state is unable, for one reason or another, to establish control and directly extract gas, carry out its transportation, further sale, profit, etc., so it can be such, let's say, such an action and such an action as

destruction so that the enemy could not use and firstly, to get gas from there , secondly, to get non-profits from there, thirdly, to actually extract and weaken and reduce gas and mineral reserves that may be they are also not infinite therefore, it is necessary to understand that russia is extracting, continues to extract and constantly reduces there reserves accordingly here let's put it this way, all the legal grounds are absolutely on our side well, then we are waiting for an official notification from the general staff although if, for example, aksyonov admitted usually they hide such things and that someone disappears, someone is being searched for and here it was reported openly well of course well and again i allow and absolutely what it can be i do not deny that this fact is just for accuracy in order to

verify it is not better then we wait well then at the time, the ministry of defense of great britain reported in its daily report that the kremlin continues to consider its non-invasion of ukraine as a special military operation and not a war, and that it is actively hindering the russian armed forces. can you now explain what this obstacle is, that they do not recognize the war how does it interfere with their goals, well, i will try to explain. the fact is that somewhere from the month of april, when those direct defense organizations in russia that have not yet been banned there and that have an opportunity to at least do something like these human rights organizations that started to provide legal assistance to soldiers or guardsmen who refused to go to fight against ukraine, there were several hundred of them there, it turned out that in

principle, the contract signed by the servicemen did not include contract workers about the fact that they can be involved in hostilities in the event of external aggression to protect russia as a state or in the event that russia conducts hostilities, accordingly declaring a state of war there and all legal procedures, i.e. using its forces troops abroad, at least somehow legitimizing it was not possible during any special operation, and this slogan began to be used by the small number of military personnel who refused to go to fight, then russia tried to criminalize this point, that is, they wanted to make a reference to the criminal code that if someone refuses to go to fight and participate in a so-called special operation, such military liability can be threatened by criminal charges for failure to comply with an order, but this also did not

work to a certain extent because there is a small the sanction is a short term punishment is provided and accordingly, i understand that those who refuse and those who motivate their refusal by the fact that their contracts do not provide for participation in some so-called special operations, that's why it becomes an obstacle. well, the plus is that of course that for conducting such measures as a special operation, it is difficult, perhaps, to be able to carry out some kind of nationwide full mobilization of the general, this also becomes an obstacle, so i think that in the sum of these factors, they, uh, obviously, obviously , this is exactly what the representatives of the british ministry of defense and development well, yes, he can declare and only or if there is really a threat and he can declare a state of martial law and

conduct mobilization and so on, or a state of war, a state of war, he will most likely not declare a state of war because it is a direct declaration of a war in ukraine is practically a recognition of a fact that we all already understand, but a state of martial law with mobilization. this is what he can theoretically declare , understood. there were two messages this weekend . well, first of all, jenstoltenberg nato in an interview the german media said that the war in ukraine could last for years and the western countries should prepare for it, and secondly, almost simultaneously with this statement, the british edition of the sunday times published a column by british prime minister boris johnson. to prepare for a protracted war, but on the one hand, we hear about what modern weapons ukraine will receive from its partners in order to expel the russian

invaders from ukraine as soon as possible, and on the other hand, we hear statements that the war will last for years these two theses differ a little. you know, i think that it may be about the terms of their interpretation and what is meant. i think that it is not about the fact that the war can last for years in that phase and in that in some way , we are observing now when there are extremely hot active battles in the east of our country and in the south, and when the russian military is constantly attacking ukrainian positions, and we can still talk about the fact that this change in this active phase will come to a phase or a calmer one. well, if it is possible to use such the word in general to war, but let's say it can turn into a low-intensity, low- intensity conflict, and here is this conflict of so-called

trench warfare or low-intensity . today, more and more often , it is becoming clear that russia, unfortunately, is not abandoning its aggressive imperial course, the kremlin's declared intentions are actually for expansion, which is publicly recognized by the president of russia in particular putin they persist and now we see, we hear more and more often only about the risks of a potential expansion of the space of russian aggression, in particular with the involvement of the same belarusian troops, only not even against ukraine, but against e, in particular, and nato member countries, and if we mentioned britain, then e the actual head of the troops, the commander of the british troops, he also made a comment for the

british sky news agency, saying that britain should be ready to be able to defend itself , in particular, on the territory of europe, taking into account the risks which come from and that is why i think that the question is broader, it not only directly relates to hostilities, it relates to that state that can be, uh, that can have by the way, not only military manifestations , but also manifestations of political, diplomatic, economic , cyber, and so on, which can be aggressive against ukraine and also against europe but of course the main site is this confrontation, it is precisely in the military component, it is currently focused on the territory of our state, thank you very much for your comment oleksandr musienko, head of the center of military and legal studies was on radio svoboda, two cruise missiles hit ljubotin, kharkiv region around midnight, one missile hit the

building of the vocational technical lyceum of railway e-e railway transport and one training building was completely destroyed. we can see the consequences of this shelling further. the vocational technical lyceum was destroyed to be located in the city of lubotyn due to the impact of two presumably cruise missiles right behind me this was an educational building in the past and the present time as we we can see there are only ruins, there were no armed people here. yes, it was an educational institution, these circumstances give us the opportunity to believe that it contains signs of a war crime committed by the armed forces of the aggressor country. they studied. children from sumy and poltava region came from zaporozhye and odessa. there were 30% somewhere of our

local people, kharkiv district, kharkiv region, that there were already many dynasties in our country, because our school was 304 years old, and the children of the children were already taught . that's for sure, but our window was shaking, the floor was broken and there was a flash above us, we didn't understand where and what happened to my husband, it's scary, my heart is trembling in my heel , of course, we're very worried about lyubotyn , for the city, for ukraine, somewhere without 10-12 something was the first explosion and after 25 minutes there was the second explosion the second explosion the explosion was already in the face and the first explosion was 80 today we are ready to continue

the education of our students in the distance format and we will also continue recruiting for training since in principle the system of distance education training in our institution, she has worked out, and she was captured by russia. the defenders of azovstal who kept the defense of mariupol alive, but in what conditions they are kept, it is not known about this in an interview with the left bank publication, said the head of the presidential office andriy yarmak, meanwhile, the human rights council of the kingdom of morocco turned to russia with a request to ensure a fair trial for the captured serviceman of the armed forces of ukraine, bragiy musaadun, who, together with two citizens of great britain, was sentenced to death in the so-called dnr i will remind you of the punishments, all three of them were captured in mariupol, the ukrainian authorities doubt that the sentence can be carried out, in particular , vice prime minister iryna vereshchuk stated that the purpose of this

process is to terrorize the society, in particular, the society of western countries. she is convinced that in the end these three servicemen will be exchanged i would like to remind you that the world community sharply condemned this sentence, and the un human rights office called it a war crime, nevertheless, the leader of the so-called dnr, controlled by the kremlin, denys kushilin, just the day before, said that by the end of the summer on in the occupied donetsk region, a so-called tribunal will be held over all military personnel of the armed forces of ukraine and ukrainians and foreigners who were captured, according to him, now they say that the statute of the tribunal is being drafted. well, he claims that all military personnel who defended mariupol in australia are now in the territory of the so-called dpr, although about the kremlin agency and informs that the commanders of the azov regiment svyatoslav palamar and the commander of the 36th marine brigade serhiy volynskyi were taken to russia for allegedly conducting investigative actions where exactly they could take out the pelvis. the american institute for the study of war does not specify, and in its current report

it reports that the russian authorities probably want to use trials against captured ukrainian servicemen, in particular for those who defended mariupol, to strengthen control over the occupied territories and further demoralize the ukrainian defenders. what is known about the defenders of mariupol for now, let's talk about it further from the contact tatyana kharko, sister of serhiy volynskyi , call sign volyn, my greetings to you good day please tell me what you know now about your brother, unfortunately, there is absolutely no confirmed information. we have also seen all these news that are published in online publications, but to this day we do not know how much we can trust these news. and what representatives of the ukrainian authorities or people who are involved in the process of exchanges are speaking, i don't know how

convincing they are. perhaps in their message that your relatives will be exchanged soon. will be exchanged and that our authorities will make every effort to make it happen in the nearest or shortest time, but for today we do not have any information, clear promises, er, with clear terms, and when was the last time you spoke with your brother, look at the phone conversation in general the matter is not being discussed now, but the last contact with him was on may 20, when he was at the plant and from azovstal, he sent us an sms with the text that he would no longer be in touch after that, there was no e-e message. and when he is now, we are not

we know what condition it is in, under what conditions we are keeping them. we don't have any information. please tell me, and i understand that there is no talk of an exchange in the near future. that is, you are in such a condition when, uh, well, you don't have any information now when although it is possible that there may be an exchange of some part of the military there. no, i do not have any information. well, of course, we are trying to look for this information, but today there is no result. and have you seen this court in the so-called dnr? well, of course, of course, we follow the news. what do you see? yes, what do you think is the purpose of these trials? what do you think? look, i can't comment on what the people who carry out these criminal trials think, what's on their minds. i

really want to believe that it's all done for the public is shown for the public, but i don't know how it actually is, of course, we are very scared and all these courts are not legal. this is the fate of people and how to deal with them they will lead us to the unknown we cannot talk about the fact that this is really a trial for a tick, as they say, because it is not known how it will actually be well, the ukrainian authorities, in particular, iryna vereshchuk, she said that it is for the purpose of intimidation, for the purpose of terror, for the purpose of demoralization yes, of course. but society is affected very negatively. everyone is very scared. all the

relatives who are currently looking for and waiting for their loved ones to be released from captivity. this information scares them and us too , but what is the purpose of this? i think that no one can be sure of this situation. now tatiana and tell me, do you know about the participation of any third countries, third parties, third organizations that are currently related to these exchange processes? regarding the exchange processes. no, we do not know, but we know that the red cross, e. and from australia and also uh, he had to monitor the well , perform some kind of monitoring mission, monitor the conditions of the boys in captivity, monitor their physical health